Galatians 2:18
“Justification Comes Through Faith in Christ”Galatians 2:15–21
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- εἰeiIfG1487CONDConjunction
- γὰρgarforG1063CONJConjunction
- ἃhathatG3739R-APNRelative pronoun Accusative Plural Neuter
- κατέλυσαkatelusaI had torn downG2647V-AAI-1SVerb Aorist Active Indicative 1st Singular
- ταῦταtautathese thingsG3778D-APNDemonstrative pronoun Accusative Plural Neuter
- πάλινpalinagainG3825ADVAdverb
- οἰκοδομῶoikodomōI buildG3618V-PAI-1SVerb Present Active Indicative 1st Singular
- παραβάτηνparabatēna transgressorG3848N-ASMNoun Accusative Singular Masculine
- ἐμαυτὸνemautonmyselfG1473F-1ASMReflexive pronoun Accusative 1st Singular Masculine
- συνιστάνω·sunistanōI proveG4921V-PAI-1SVerb Present Active Indicative 1st Singular
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Galatians 2:11–21. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
I.From the account which Paul gives of what passed between him and the other apostles at Jerusalem, the Galatians might easily discern both the falseness of what his enemies had insinuated against him and their own folly and weakness in departing from that gospel which he had preached to them. But to give the greater weight to what he had already said, and more fully to fortify them against the insinuations of the judaizing teachers, he acquaints them with another interview which he had with the apostle Peter at Antioch, and what passed between them there, _Galatians 2:11-14. Antioch was one of the chief churches of the Gentile Christians, as Jerusalem was of those Christians who turned from Judaism to the faith of Christ. There is no colour of reason for the supposition that Peter was bishop of Antioch. If he had, surely Paul would not have withstood him in his own church, as we here find he did; but, on the contrary, it is here spoken of as an occasional visit which he made thither. In their other meeting, there had been good harmony and agreement. Peter and the other apostles had both acknowledged Paul's commission and approved his doctrine, and they parted very good friends. But in this Paul finds himself obliged to appose Peter, for he was to be blamed, a plain evidence that he was not inferior to him, and consequently of the weakness of the pope's pretence to supremacy and infallibility, as the successor of Peter. Here we may observe,
1.Peter's fault. When he came among the Gentile churches, he complied with them, and did eat with them, though they were not circumcised, agreeably to the instructions which were given in particular to him (Acts 10), when he was warned by the heavenly vision to call nothing common or unclean. But, when there came some Jewish Christians from Jerusalem, he grew more shy of the Gentiles, only to humour those of the circumcision and for fear of giving them offence, which doubtless was to the great grief and discouragement of the Gentile churches. Then he withdrew, and separated himself. His fault herein had a bad influence upon others, for the other Jews also dissembled with him; though before they might be better disposed, yet now, from his example, they took on them to scruple eating with the Gentiles, and pretended they could not in conscience do it, because they were not circumcised. And (would you think it?) Barnabas himself, one of the apostles of the Gentiles, and one who had been instrumental in planting and watering the churches of the Gentiles, was carried away with their dissimulation. Here note,
(1.)The weakness and inconstancy of the best of men, when left to themselves, and how apt they are to falter in their duty to God, out of an undue regard to the pleasing of men. And,
(2.)The great force of bad examples, especially the examples of great men and good men, such as are in reputation for wisdom and honour.
2.The rebuke which Paul gave him for his fault. Notwithstanding Peter's character, yet, when he observes him thus behaving himself to the great prejudice both of the truth of the gospel and the peace of the church, he is not afraid to reprove him for it. Paul adhered resolutely to his principles, when others faltered in theirs; he was as good a Jew as any of them (for he was a Hebrew of the Hebrews), but he would magnify his office as the apostle of the Gentiles, and therefore would not see them discouraged and trampled upon. When he saw that they walked not uprightly, according to the truth of the gospel - that they did not live up to that principle which the gospel taught, and which they had professed to own and embrace, namely, that by the death of Christ the partition-wall between Jew and Gentile was taken down, and the observance of the law of Moses was no longer in force - when he observed this, as Peter's offence was public, so he publicly reproved him for it: He said unto him before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of the Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews? Herein one part of his conduct was a contradiction to the other; for if he, who was a Jew, could himself sometimes dispense with the use of the ceremonial law, and live after the manner of the Gentiles, this showed that he did not look upon the observance of it as still necessary, even for the Jews themselves; and therefore that he could not, consistently with his own practice, impose it upon the Gentile Christians. And yet Paul charges him with this, yea, represents him as compelling the Gentiles to live as did the Jews - not by open force and violence, but this was the tendency of what he did; for it was in effect to signify this, that the Gentiles must comply with the Jews, or else not be admitted into Christian communion.
II.Paul having thus established his character and office, and sufficiently shown that he was not inferior to any of the apostles, no, not to Peter himself, from the account of the reproof he gave him he takes occasion to speak of that great fundamental doctrine of the gospel - That justification is only by faith in Christ, and not by the works of the law (though some think that all he says to the end of the chapter is what he said to Peter at Antioch), which doctrine condemned Peter for his symbolizing with the Jews. For, if it was the principle of his religion that the gospel is the instrument of our justification and not the law, then he did very ill in countenancing those who kept up the law, and were for mixing it with faith in the business of our justification. This was the doctrine which Paul had preached among the Galatians, to which he still adhered, and which it is his great business in this epistle to mention and confirm. Now concerning this Paul acquaints us,
1.With the practice of the Jewish Christians themselves: "We," says he, "who are Jews by nature, and not sinners of the Gentiles (even we who have been born and bred in the Jewish religion, and not among the impure Gentiles), knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we ourselves have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law. And, if we have thought it necessary to seek justification by the faith of Christ, why then should we hamper ourselves with the law? What did we believe in Christ for? Was it not that we might be justified by the faith of Christ? And, if so, is it not folly to go back to the law, and to expect to be justified either by the merit of moral works or the influence of any ceremonial sacrifices or purifications? And if it would be wrong in us who are Jews by nature to return to the law, and expect justification by it, would it not be much more so to require this of the Gentiles, who were never subject to it, since by the works of the law no flesh shall be justified?" To give the greater weight to this he adds (Galatians 2:17), "But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is Christ the minister of sin? If, while we seek justification by Christ alone, and teach others to do so, we ourselves are found giving countenance or indulgence to sin, or rather are accounted sinners of the Gentiles, and such as it is not fit to have communion with, unless we also observe the law of Moses, is Christ the minister of sin? Will it not follow that he is so, if he engage us to receive a doctrine that gives liberty to sin, or by which we are so far from being justified that we remain impure sinners, and unfit to be conversed with?" This, he intimates, would be the consequence, but he rejects it with abhorrence: "God forbid," says he, "that we should entertain such a thought of Christ, or of his doctrine, that thereby he should direct us into a way of justification that is defective and ineffectual, and leave those who embrace it still unjustified, or that would give the least encouragement to sin and sinners." This would be very dishonourable to Christ, and it would be very injurious to them also. "For," says he (Galatians 2:18), "if I build again the things which I destroyed - if I (or any other), who have taught that the observance of the Mosaic law is not necessary to justification, should now, by word or practice, teach or intimate that it is necessary - I make myself a transgressor; I own myself to be still an impure sinner, and to remain under the guilt of sin, notwithstanding my faith in Christ; or I shall be liable to be charged with deceit and prevarication, and acting inconsistently with myself." Thus does the apostle argue for the great doctrine of justification by faith without the works of the law from the principles and practice of the Jewish Christians themselves, and from the consequences that would attend their departure from it, whence it appeared that Peter and the other Jews were much in the wrong in refusing to communicate with the Gentile Christians, and endeavouring to bring them under the bondage of the law.
2.He acquaints us what his own judgment and practice were.
(1.)That he was dead to the law. Whatever account others might make of it, yet, for his part, he was dead to it. He knew that the moral law denounced a curse against all that continue not in all things written therein, to do them; and therefore he was dead to it, as to all hope of justification and salvation that way. And as for the ceremonial law, he also knew that it was now antiquated and superseded by the coming of Christ, and therefore, the substance having come, he had no longer any regard to the shadow. He was thus dead to the law, through the law itself; it discovered itself to be at an end. By considering the law itself, he saw that justification was not to be expected by the works of it (since none could perform a perfect obedience to it) and that there was now no further need of the sacrifices and purifications of it, since they were done away in Christ, and a period was put to them by his offering up himself a sacrifice for us; and therefore, the more he looked into it the more he saw that there was no occasion for keeping up that regard to it which the Jews pleaded for. But, though he was thus dead to the law, yet he did not look upon himself as with law. He had renounced all hopes of justification by the works of it, and was unwilling any longer to continue under the bondage of it; but he was far from thinking himself discharged from his duty to God; on the contrary, he was dead to the law, that he might live unto God. The doctrine of the gospel, which he had embraced, instead of weakening the bond of duty upon him, did but the more strengthen and confirm it; and therefore, though he was dead to the law, yet it was only in order to his living a new and better life to God (as Romans 7:4, Romans 7:6), such a life as would be more agreeable and acceptable to God than his observance of the Mosaic law could now be, that is, a life of faith in Christ, and, under the influence thereof, of holiness and righteousness towards God. Agreeably hereunto he acquaints us,
(2.)That, as he was dead to the law, so he was alive unto God through Jesus Christ (Galatians 2:20): I am crucified with Christ, etc. And here in his own person he gives us an excellent description of the mysterious life of a believer.
[1.]He is crucified, and yet he lives; the old man is crucified (Romans 6:6), but the new man is living; he is dead to the world, and dead to the law, and yet alive to God and Christ; sin is mortified, and grace quickened.
[2.]He lives, and yet not he. This is strange: I live, and yet not I; he lives in the exercise of grace; he has the comforts and the triumphs of grace; and yet that grace is not from himself, but from another. Believers see themselves living in a state of dependence.
[3.]He is crucified with Christ, and yet Christ lives in him; this results from his mystical union with Christ, by means of which he is interested in the death of Christ, so as by virtue of that to die unto sin; and yet interested in the life of Christ, so as by virtue of that to live unto God.
[4.]He lives in the flesh, and yet lives by faith; to outward appearance he lives as other people do, his natural life is supported as others are; yet he has a higher and nobler principle that supports and actuates him, that of faith in Christ, and especially as eyeing the wonders of his love in giving himself for him. Hence it is that, though he lives in the flesh, yet he does not live after the flesh. Note, Those who have true faith live by that faith; and the great thing which faith fastens upon is Christ's loving us and giving himself for us. The great evidence of Christ's loving us is his giving himself for us; and this is that which we are chiefly concerned to mix faith with, in order to our living to him.
Lastly, The apostle concludes this discourse with acquainting us that by the doctrine of justification by faith in Christ, without the works of the law (which he asserted, and others opposed), he avoided two great difficulties, which the contrary opinion was loaded with: - 1. That he did not frustrate the grace of God, which the doctrine of the justification by the works of the law did; for, as he argues (Romans 11:6), If it be of works, it is no more of grace. 2. That he did not frustrate the death of Christ; whereas, if righteousness come by the law, then it must follow that Christ has died in vain; for, if we look for salvation by the law of Moses, then we render the death of Christ needless: for to what purpose should he be appointed to die, if we might have been saved without it?
Historical interpretation
Five Centuries of Reception
5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
How should (the Church) fear to suffer a fraudulent loss of him whom she had already lost on his ereption, and whom, after condemnation, she could not have held? Lastly, to what will it be becoming for a judge to grant indulgence? to that which by a formal pronouncement he has decisively settled, or to that which by an interlocutory sentence he has left in suspense? And, of course, (I am speaking of) that judge who is not wont "to rebuild those things which he has destroyed, lest he be held a transgressor."
Justly, therefore, did he refuse to "build up again (the structure of the law) which he had overthrown." The law, indeed, had to be overthrown, from the moment when John "cried in the wilderness, Prepare ye the ways of the Lord," that valleys and hills and mountains may be filled up and levelled, and the crooked and the rough ways be made straight and smooth -in other words, that the difficulties of the law might be changed into the facilities of the gospel.
"For if I build up again those things which I destroyed, I prove myself a transgressor."
Observe the Apostle's discernment; his opponents endeavored to show, that he who kept not the Law was a transgressor, but he retorts the argument upon them, and shows that he who did keep the Law was a transgressor, not merely of faith, but of the Law itself. "I build up again the things which I destroyed," that is, the Law; he means as follows: the Law has confessedly ceased, and we have abandoned it, and betaken ourselves to the salvation which comes of faith. But if we make a point of setting it up again, we become by that very act transgressors, striving to keep what God has annulled. Next he shows how it has been annulled.
(Vers. 17, 18.) Therefore, by the works of the Law, all flesh will not be justified. But if we seek to be justified in Christ, we ourselves have also been found to be sinners, is Christ then a minister of sin? Certainly not! For if the things that I destroyed, I build again, I make myself a transgressor. That flesh, of which it is written, 'All flesh is grass, and all its glory is like the flower of the field' (Isaiah 40:6), will not be justified by the works of the Law. But that flesh of Jesus Christ is justified by faith, of which it is said in the sacrament of the resurrection: All flesh shall see the salvation of God (Luke 3:6). But also according to a lower understanding, not all flesh was justified by the Law, but only those men who were in Palestine. Now, however, all flesh is justified by the faith of Jesus Christ, while his Church is founded throughout the whole world.
When they say that he who does not keep the law is a transgressor, he says the exact opposite, calling a transgressor the person who keeps the law. It is like saying: The law has ceased, as we confessed, and so, having abandoned it, we have taken refuge with the salvation which is from faith. If, then, we contest about the application of the law, we become transgressor of the same, inasmuch as we contest about keeping what has been dissolved by God.
Continue studying Galatians 2:18 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.


Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
To build up again the law as the way to be right with God, after tearing it down, would make a man a transgressor against the gospel he has received.
“For if I build again”
Paul puts it in the first person, and the warning reaches Peter and everyone who would go back.
“the things which I destroyed,”
Reliance on the law for righteousness, which Paul let go when he came to Christ.
“I make myself a transgressor.”
The guilt lies with the one who rebuilds.
Passage studyGalatians 2:15–21
Justified by Faith, Crucified with Christ
Summary
At Antioch, Peter stopped eating with Gentile believers once certain men came from James, and Paul rebuked him in front of them all. These seven verses give the reason. Paul and Peter were Jews by birth, yet they knew that a man is justified by the faith of Jesus Christ, so they too believed in Christ to be justified, “for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.” If believers are then found to be sinners, Christ is still holy and far from being sin’s servant, and the one who rebuilds the law as a way to God makes himself the transgressor. Through the law Paul died to the law so that he might live unto God. He is crucified with Christ, Christ lives in him, and his whole life rests on the Son of God, “who loved me, and gave himself for me.” If righteousness came by the law, Christ died in vain. Here we learn how God puts a sinner right with himself, and we see the love of Christ at the center of it.
Why Paul said this to Peter
These words close Paul’s account of what happened at Antioch (Galatians 2:11–14). Peter had been eating freely with Gentile believers. When certain men came from James, he withdrew and separated himself, because he feared those of the circumcision, and the other Jewish believers followed him until even Barnabas was carried away. Paul saw that this denied the truth of the gospel. It told the Gentile believers that they were unclean, or incomplete, until they took up Jewish customs and food laws. So Paul rebuked Peter openly, and verses 15 to 21 are the reason he gave. They are also the heart of the whole letter.
Behind the quarrel stood the great question of the early church: how Gentiles who believed belonged to God’s people. Some Jewish believers insisted that Gentile converts must be circumcised and keep the law of Moses, with its food laws and its Sabbath, to be truly saved or fully accepted. For centuries circumcision, the food laws and the purity rules had marked Israel out as a people set apart by covenant, and letting them go felt to many Jewish believers like betraying their heritage. The church in Jerusalem faced the same question and settled that Gentile believers are saved by grace through faith, free of circumcision and the law of Moses (Acts 15). Peter’s withdrawal shows how strong the old pressure still was. Paul treats any message that adds the law to Christ as another gospel (Galatians 1:6–9), and he argues the point at length in Galatians 3.
Jews by nature, and sinners of the Gentiles
Paul begins from where he and Peter stood by birth. Ioudaîos, Jew, means one who belongs to Judah, a Judaean, and so a member of the Jewish people. Phýsis, nature, comes from a word for growth, and here it means what a person is by birth and descent. “Jews by nature” are Jews from birth. Paul and Peter were born into the covenant people, and the law and the promises of God came to them as an inheritance with their birth.
“Sinners of the Gentiles” was the common Jewish way of speaking of everyone else. Hamartōlós means a sinful person, a transgressor. Among Jews it was used for people who habitually broke the law, and more broadly for Gentiles, who lived outside the law and were counted idolatrous and unclean. The words “of the Gentiles” (ek ethnōn) mark where such people came from. Paul writes of the same divide in Ephesians, where Gentiles were called “Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands”, and were “aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world” (Ephesians 2:11–12).
People ask why Paul uses a phrase like “sinners of the Gentiles” when he is about to show that all stand alike before God. He names the line the way Peter’s table had just drawn it, so that he can erase it in the next verse. Even “we”, born Jews with every privilege, had to believe in Christ to be justified. So the Jew turns out to be in the same need as the Gentile, as Paul says in Romans: “we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin; As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one” (Romans 3:9–10), and “all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23).
Christ bore the sin of both, and through his cross he has broken down “the middle wall of partition” between Jew and Gentile (Ephesians 2:14–16). So Paul can say later in this letter, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28).
How a man is justified before God
Verse 16 is the center of the passage. To be justified, dikaióō, is to be rendered just or innocent, that is, shown or regarded as just. It is the language of a courtroom. God the judge declares a person righteous, acquits him of his sin and brings him into a right relationship with himself. Justification is God’s verdict on a person, and it comes as a gift.
Paul presses the point by saying it again and again. The phrase “the works of the law” stands three times in verse 16, and each time it is set against faith in Christ. Works, érgon, means toil or effort, and so an act. “The works of the law” are the deeds the law of Moses required, such as circumcision, the food laws and the Sabbath, which some held were needed to gain or keep a righteous standing with God. Faith, pístis, means persuasion or credence, a conviction of the truth of God, and above all reliance upon Christ for salvation. It is a trust that rests its whole weight on Christ as Savior and Lord.
“Even we have believed in Jesus Christ.” Paul counts himself and Peter in. They were Jews by nature, raised under the law, and they still came to Christ to be justified like any Gentile. If the law could have justified anyone, it would have justified them.
The verse ends with the reason. The word for “for”, dióti, gives the ground of all that went before: “for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.” Sárx, flesh, covers a wide range, from meat to the body to human nature with its frailties, and it can mean a human being as such. Here it means every human being, without exception. Paul says the same in Romans: “by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin” (Romans 3:20), and “a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law” (Romans 3:28). The law shows us our sin and leads us to Christ: “the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith” (Galatians 3:24). “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast” (Ephesians 2:8–9). Paul’s own hope was to be found in Christ with “the righteousness which is of God by faith” (Philippians 3:9).
All of this rests on Christ himself. He kept the law perfectly on our behalf, and so he is “the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth” (Romans 10:4). By the obedience of one, many are made righteous (Romans 5:19). God “hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him” (2 Corinthians 5:21). He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). His righteousness is counted to everyone who believes, so our standing with God rests on his finished work, and it holds steady while our own performance rises and falls.
What “the faith of Jesus Christ” means
The KJV’s “the faith of Jesus Christ” puts pístis beside Christ’s name in a phrase the Greek allows to be read two ways, and believers differ on which Paul meant first. On one reading it is our faith in Jesus Christ, the trust we place in him, and many modern translations print “faith in Jesus Christ”. The middle of the verse, “even we have believed in Jesus Christ”, speaks of exactly that trust, and all through Galatians Paul stresses believing as the way we receive God’s grace. On the other reading it is the faithfulness of Jesus Christ himself, his fidelity and obedience all the way to the cross, which then becomes the ground of our trust in him. Both are true. Our faith rests on Christ, and his faithfulness made our salvation possible. The same phrase returns in verse 20 as “the faith of the Son of God”.
Do good works still matter?
Good works matter a great deal, and they follow justification as its fruit. Verse 16 rules them out as the ground on which God declares us righteous. Once a person is justified, good works flow from his faith, for “we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them” (Ephesians 2:10). They are the evidence of a living faith and part of growing in holiness, and they come from love for God and neighbor after the verdict has already been given.
Is Christ the minister of sin?
Paul answers this question with “God forbid,” the strongest refusal he has. The Greek is mē genoito, from mḗ, a word of negation, and gínomai, to become or to happen, so it means “May it not happen!” or “Let it not be!” Paul uses it often, and in Romans he uses it against a near relation of this question: “Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid” (Romans 6:1–2). A minister, diákonos, is an attendant, a waiter at table or one who does other humble service, and in the church a Christian teacher or deacon. To call Christ “the minister of sin” would make him sin’s servant, the one who helps it along.
The question grows out of the words “we ourselves also are found sinners”, and believers differ on what Paul means by them. On one reading, Jewish believers who leave the law behind to seek justification in Christ, and who eat with Gentiles as Peter had done, are counted sinners by those who judge by the law, under the very name they had given the Gentiles in verse 15. The legalist then concludes that Christ has led them into sin. On the other reading, believers who are justified in Christ still find sin in themselves, because the law goes on exposing it, and someone who misunderstands grace concludes that Christ’s way has failed them or that he is to blame. On either reading Paul’s answer is the same. Christ is the sinless Lamb who came to take away sin, and the sin a believer finds in himself belongs to fallen human nature, which drives him back to Christ for grace. Christ died for us while we were yet sinners (Romans 5:8), to redeem us from both the power and the penalty of sin.
The verse also guards the line between justification and sanctification. Justification is God’s single act of declaring a believing sinner righteous, a change in our standing that is complete when we first believe: “Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ” (Romans 5:1). Sanctification is the Holy Spirit’s lifelong work of making us like Christ in character and conduct. The struggle that belongs to sanctification leaves our justification untouched, and grace itself leads to holiness and a hatred of sin. Christ raises his people to walk in newness of life (Romans 6:4), and Paul, crying out “who shall deliver me from the body of this death?”, answers, “I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord” (Romans 7:24–25). So the verse shuts out two errors at once, trying to earn salvation by the law and using grace as a cover for sin.
Building again what was destroyed
In verse 18 Paul speaks of himself, and the words fit Peter and anyone else who goes back. To build, oikodoméō, means to build or construct, and figuratively to build up or edify. With pálin, “again”, it means to put back up what had been taken down. To destroy, katalýō, means to loosen down, to demolish or dissolve. What Paul had demolished was the law as his way of being justified. He had once been a zealous Pharisee who tried to earn God’s favor by keeping it, and when Christ was revealed to him he let that hope go. Building it again means teaching that the law is needed for righteousness, or living as though it were, which is what Peter’s withdrawal from the Gentiles’ table said without words.
A transgressor, parabátēs, is one who breaks or disobeys the law. Paul says the man who rebuilds would “make myself a transgressor”. He means that rebuilding the law as a way to God would set him against the gospel of grace he had received and preached, and he would condemn himself by denying that Christ’s work was enough. To raise the law up again as a path to righteousness implies that Christ’s sacrifice left something unfinished. Hebrews says that the old commandment was set aside, “For the law made nothing perfect”, and that a better hope brings us near to God (Hebrews 7:18–19). By his blood Christ has opened “a new and living way” into God’s presence (Hebrews 10:19–20), and he is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes (Romans 10:4).
Does this make the law bad?
The law is good, and Paul says so: “the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good” (Romans 7:12). Its work is to expose sin and show us our need of a Savior. What Paul tore down was the law as a means of justification, and its moral authority and its power to show us our sin still stand. In Christ the law’s demands are fulfilled, and the Spirit enables believers to live righteously as the fruit of their salvation (Romans 8:3–4).
Dead to the law, that I might live unto God
Verse 19 opens with gár, “for”, which gives the reason for what Paul has just said. Nómos, law, means first the law of Moses, the whole body of commands given to Israel through Moses, and in Paul’s argument it also stands for any attempt to earn God’s favor by works. In “through the law” the word diá marks the means, so the law itself brought about Paul’s death to the law. The law is holy, and by its perfect demands it showed him his sin and his inability to keep it, and so it put to death every hope of being righteous by his own keeping of it.
Apothnḗskō, “am dead”, is the ordinary verb to die. Paul uses death as his picture because a dead man is out of reach of the laws that bound him. In the same way Paul has finished with the law as a system for earning God’s favor and as the thing that defined his standing with God. Romans says it with another picture: “ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead” (Romans 7:4).
This death took place at the cross. Christ kept the law and then bore its curse in our place: “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us” (Galatians 3:13). Joined to him in his death, believers die to the law’s demands and its condemnation, and the handwriting of ordinances that was against us has been blotted out and nailed to his cross (Colossians 2:14). His resurrection begins the new life, lived in the power of the Spirit: “There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus” (Romans 8:1–4).
Paul died to the law “that I might live unto God”, and hína, “that”, gives the purpose. Záō means to live, to be alive. The new life is lived toward God, in union with him through Christ and in the strength of his Spirit, out of love and gratitude. Romans tells believers to reckon themselves “dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord” (Romans 6:11).
Does “dead to the law” mean we may ignore God’s commands?
Dying to the law frees us from it as a way of being justified, and it leads into a fuller obedience that springs from love and is given by the Spirit. Paul says that love fulfils the law (Romans 13:8–10), that our freedom is for serving one another by love (Galatians 5:13–14), and that those who walk in the Spirit bear the Spirit’s fruit (Galatians 5:16–23). Living under the law means trying to win God’s acceptance by keeping rules, which leads to pride when we think we have succeeded and to despair when we see that we have failed. Living unto God means receiving righteousness as a gift by faith (Philippians 3:9) and then living to glorify him.
I am crucified with Christ
Verse 20 is the high point of Paul’s answer. “Crucified with” is one Greek word, systauróō, to crucify together with someone, literally or figuratively. Through faith the old “I”, whose identity lay in the law and who was in bondage to sin, has been put to death with Christ on his cross. This is already true of every believer. Romans speaks of all who were baptized into Christ’s death and raised with him to walk in newness of life (Romans 6:3–4), and Colossians says, “ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God” (Colossians 3:3–4).
“Nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me.” The verb záō comes back again and again in this verse. A new life has begun, and its source and strength is Christ himself, dwelling in the believer by his Spirit. The old self stays in the grave, and the new life comes from Christ, who now animates and directs the one he lives in. Jesus promised that he and the Father would come to the one who loves him and make their abode with him (John 14:23), and the Spirit was poured out at Pentecost (Acts 2:1–4). Paul could say elsewhere, “For to me to live is Christ” (Philippians 1:21). This is the new creature of Galatians 6:15, and the life begun in the Spirit that Paul will later plead with the Galatians to keep living in the Spirit (Galatians 3:3).
“And the life which I now live in the flesh.” In verse 16 flesh meant a human being, and here it means ordinary bodily life in this world. Christ’s life in us is lived out in real days, and it is sustained “by the faith of the Son of God”, which holds together Christ’s own faithfulness and our steady trust in him. He is “the author and finisher of our faith” (Hebrews 12:2).
“Who loved me, and gave himself for me.” Here the whole verse comes to rest. To give, paradídōmi, means to surrender, yield up or entrust, and joined with heautoû, “himself”, it describes Christ’s free and deliberate giving of himself to death for others. The words are personal: the Son of God loved Paul and gave himself for him, in his place. Paul uses like words of Christ’s love for the whole church, which “hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God” (Ephesians 5:2). This love is the ground of everything else in the verse. The death with Christ, the indwelling life and the life of faith all come from his initiative and his sacrifice.
Does being crucified with Christ end the struggle with sin?
Being crucified with Christ breaks the rule and the condemnation of sin over the believer, and the fight with the sin that remains goes on through this life. In God’s sight the believer is defined by his new identity in Christ. Yet “the flesh lusteth against the Spirit” (Galatians 5:17), and so we are told to “Walk in the Spirit” (Galatians 5:16) and through the Spirit to “mortify the deeds of the body” (Romans 8:13). The death we died with Christ lies in the past, and it gives the strength for the daily growth in holiness that follows.
Why Christ would have died in vain
Paul ends with a sentence that holds the whole argument. “I do not frustrate the grace of God.” To frustrate, athetéō, is built from a negative particle and a word from the verb to place or set, and it means to set aside, to disesteem, to neutralize or to violate. To seek righteousness by the law is to set God’s grace aside as worthless or unnecessary. Paul refuses to do it, and with that he answers Peter’s withdrawal one last time.
“For if righteousness come by the law.” The ei, “if”, sets up a condition. Righteousness, dikaiosýnē, means equity of character or act, and here it is justification, the standing of one declared right in God’s sight. “By the law” uses diá and nómos again, the law pictured as the channel through which righteousness might be sought.
“Then Christ is dead in vain.” Ára, “then”, marks what follows from the “if”. “Christ is dead” uses Christós with apothnḗskō, the verb of verse 19. In vain, dōreán, is a form of the word for a gift used as an adverb, and it means gratuitously, without a cause, for naught. If anyone could be made righteous by keeping the law, Christ’s death would have been needless and its purpose would have come to naught. Since the law cannot make us righteous, his death was necessary, and it is enough. “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4:12), and we are “justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus” (Romans 3:24).
The Son of God who loved me
This passage puts every believer on the same ground. Peter, born a Jew with the law and the promises, and the Gentile at his table, once counted among the sinners, were justified in the same way, by faith in the same Christ. Family, upbringing and religious standing all fall away at the foot of the cross, where the ground is level and every one of us stands as a sinner who needs the same Savior.
It shows us God’s grace as a gift. Righteousness comes to us as God’s verdict, received by faith and resting on Christ’s finished work, so our peace with God holds steady on the days when we fail. The good works that follow are thanks for what has already been given.
And it shows us who Christ is to each believer. The Son of God loved Paul and gave himself for him, and every believer may say the same words of himself. The life we now live is Christ’s life in us, lived by trusting him. Paul would sooner die than set that grace aside, and the cross shows what it cost.
Galatians 2:15
“We who are Jews by nature,”
“We” is Paul and Peter, and with them the Jewish believers who had followed Peter’s withdrawal. They were Jews from birth, members of the covenant people.
“and not sinners of the Gentiles,”
The common Jewish name for non-Jews, who lived outside the law. The sentence runs on into verse 16, where these born Jews confess that they too needed Christ.
Galatians 2:16
“Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law,”
Paul appeals to what he and Peter both already know. “A man” means any person at all, Jew or Gentile.
“but by the faith of Jesus Christ,”
Our trust in Christ, or Christ’s own faithfulness, and both are true (see above).
“even we have believed in Jesus Christ,”
Jews by nature, with the law in their hands, came to Christ like everyone else.
“that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law:”
The purpose of their believing, stated once more.
“for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.”
The reason, brought in by dióti. Flesh here stands for every human being.
Galatians 2:17
“But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ,”
“We” again means Jewish believers like Peter and Paul, who have turned from the law to Christ for their righteousness.
“we ourselves also are found sinners,”
Counted sinners by those who judge by the law, or finding sin still at work in themselves (see above).
“is therefore Christ the minister of sin?”
The false conclusion that Christ serves and promotes sin.
“God forbid.”
Mē genoito, Paul’s strongest refusal, “Let it not be!”
Galatians 2:18 This verse
“For if I build again”
Paul puts it in the first person, and the warning reaches Peter and everyone who would go back.
“the things which I destroyed,”
Reliance on the law for righteousness, which Paul let go when he came to Christ.
“I make myself a transgressor.”
The guilt lies with the one who rebuilds.
Galatians 2:19
“For I through the law”
The law was the means of Paul’s death to it, because it showed him his sin.
“am dead to the law,”
Paul has finished with the law as the way to stand right before God.
“that I might live unto God.”
The purpose of that death is a life directed toward God.
Galatians 2:20
“I am crucified with Christ:”
One Greek word, systauróō. The old self died with Christ on his cross.
“nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me:”
Paul is alive, and the life in him is Christ’s own, dwelling in him by the Spirit.
“and the life which I now live in the flesh”
His ordinary bodily life in this world.
“I live by the faith of the Son of God,”
Lived by trusting the Son of God, who is faithful.
“who loved me, and gave himself for me.”
Christ’s personal love, shown in his free self-giving to death in Paul’s place.
Galatians 2:21
“I do not frustrate the grace of God:”
Paul will keep God’s grace whole and refuses to set it aside.
“for if righteousness come by the law,”
A condition Paul states in order to show where it leads.
“then Christ is dead in vain.”
Christ’s death would have been for naught, which shows that righteousness comes another way.
Last revised