मुख्य सामग्री पर जाएँ

Commentary

20 of 465
  1. Romans 2:2
    If you, a sinner, pass judgment upon a sinner like yourself, how much more will God, who is just, condemn you as unjust? If he did not do so, it might appear that evil is pleasing to him while good is not. But God has no favorites, and he spared neither his friends (the patriarchs) nor his angels when they sinned! Human judgment on the other hand is imperfect in many ways. The integrity of judges is often compromised by love, hate, fear and greed, and occasionally mercy is allowed to overturn the rule of justice.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  2. Romans 2:4
    Do you imagine you can act with impunity just because God does not punish immediately.… Listen to the words of Scripture: “The Lord is not slow with his promises … but is forbearing toward you, not wishing that any should perish but that all should reach repentance.” The Lord is good in as much as he waits and just in as much as he punishes.… People may go far astray because of God’s patience, because he does not want to punish sinners immediately. And because he delays, people suppose either that he does not care at all about human affairs or that he overlooks sins.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  3. Romans 2:5
    Unaware that you are sick, you use the very cure in order to sustain even greater wounds.… Rejected kindness leads in the end to severer judgment, so that the man who refused to be touched by mercy is afflicted with punishment.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  4. Romans 2:7
    The reward for well-doing is awaited with patience because it is not given in this life. The glory is that with which the saints will shine like the sun. Nothing is greater than the honor of the children of God, on account of which they will judge even the angels.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  5. Romans 2:9
    The apostle threatens the soul with punishment because of heretics who say that only the flesh does wrong and that the soul cannot sin. Or perhaps “soul” refers to the whole man.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  6. Romans 2:10
    Glory is opposed to wrath and honor to displeasure. What Paul called “immortality” above he calls “peace” here. The word first is emphatic and means “indeed,” because God does not play favorites. Or it may mean first in time but not in honor.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  7. Romans 2:12
    “Will perish” means the same thing as “will be judged,” for the man who perishes perishes by God’s judgment, and the man who is judged a sinner perishes. Paul puts Jews and Gentiles on the same level when he says that doers rather than hearers of the law are righteous and then adds that the Gentiles will be judged on the day of the Lord. For does anyone doubt that those under the law will perish just as those who lived without the law, unless they have believed in Christ?

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  8. Romans 2:14
    Paul is referring either to those who were righteous before the law or to those who even now are doing some good. He shows that the Gentiles are not without any kind of law in order to leave them with no excuse and to take away the glory which the Jews had by their possession of the law.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  9. Romans 2:15
    Nature produces a law in their hearts through the witness of their conscience. Or it may mean that the conscience testifies to the fact that it has its own law, because even if the sinner is afraid of no one the conscience is worried when he sins and rejoices when that sin is overcome.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  10. Romans 2:16
    Paul says that there is a mental debate when we decide after long deliberation what we should and should not do. On the day of the Lord we shall be judged by this. This proves that we were not ignorant of good and evil. Or perhaps it means that on the day of judgment our conscience and our thoughts will appear before our eyes like history lessons to be learned; they will either accuse us or excuse us.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  11. Romans 2:17
    At this point Paul turns to the Jews and says that a man should be a Jew in deed and not merely in name.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  12. Romans 2:18
    The Jew boasts that he alone understands God and knows his will. He approves what is excellent, because what is beneficial by nature is made much more so by the law.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  13. Romans 2:19
    The blind are those who have been deprived of the light of knowledge.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  14. Romans 2:20
    One who continually keeps the law in view does not stumble.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  15. Romans 2:21
    Paul says to the Jew: If you rely on the law, why do you not obey it? If you glory in God, why do you dishonor him? If you know his will, why do you not do it? If you approve what is excellent, why do you go after what is harmful? Why do you not look for the right way, if you are a guide for the blind? Surely if you saw it you would walk in it! If you are a light for others, why do you not cast off the works of darkness? As an instructor of the foolish, why have you abandoned the fear of the Lord, which is the beginning of wisdom? As a teacher of children, why are you a child in understanding? If you have the standard of knowledge and truth in the law, why do you not follow it yourself, nor by your evil example allow others to follow it? Why does your life not match your teaching, and why does your behavior make a mockery of your faith? Because you have not kept the law it will happen that not only will the law do you no good, it will condemn you for the greater crime of holding it in contempt.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  16. Romans 2:22
    There is not just one kind of adultery, for you commit adultery if you give anyone other than God what the soul owes exclusively to him.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  17. Romans 2:23
    Sacrilege is something committed only against God, because it is a violation of the sacred.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  18. Romans 2:24
    Paul realized that what he was saying was also to be found in the prophets, which is why he quotes them here.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  19. Romans 2:25
    Circumcision is of value as a sign if righteousness accompanies it; without righteousness the rest is useless. Or this [verse] may mean that circumcision enabled the Jew to live and escape condemnation in childhood before reaching the age of understanding. Or perhaps, because he set it in the context of the law, it is that … when the circumcision of the flesh ends, the true circumcision of the heart will come. A man breaks the law when he does not follow what is foretold in it.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

  20. Romans 2:26
    The visible needs the invisible but not the other way round, because the visible is an image of the invisible, while the invisible is the reality itself. Thus, the circumcision of the flesh needs the circumcision of the heart but not vice versa, because the reality does not need the image.… If circumcision has no value by itself, why was it instituted? First, in order to distinguish the people of God from among the Gentiles. This is why when they were by themselves in the desert they were not circumcised. Or perhaps so that their bodies might be identified in battle. The reason why they were marked in that part of the body was first so that they would not be disfigured in a part of the body which was open to public view, and second, because the promise of grace would make this part of the body honorable through chastity. Or perhaps it was because it signified that Christ would be born from its seed. He was destined to introduce spiritual circumcision, but until he was born, physical circumcision would continue.

    PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS

All writers