TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on Exodus 21 verses 22–36
Observe here,
I. The particular care which the law took of women with child, that no hurt should be done them which might occasion their mis-carrying. The law of nature obliges us to be very tender in that case, lest the tree and fruit be destroyed together, Exo 21:22, Exo 21:23. Women with child, who are thus taken under the special protection of the law of God, if they live in his fear, may still believe themselves under the special protection of the providence of God, and hope that they shall be saved in child-bearing. On this occasion comes in that general law of retaliation which our Saviour refers to, Mat 5:38, An eye for an eye. Now, 1. The execution of this law is not hereby put into the hands of private persons, as if every man might avenge himself, which would introduce universal confusion, and make men like the fishes of the sea. The tradition of the elders seems to have put this corrupt gloss upon it, in opposition to which our Saviour commands us to forgive injuries, and not to meditate revenge, Mat 5:39. 2. God often executes it in the course of his providence, making the punishment, in many cases, to answer to the sin, as Jdg 1:7; Isa 33:1; Hab 2:13; Mat 26:52. 3. Magistrates ought to have an eye to this rule in punishing offenders, and doing right to those that are injured. Consideration must be had of the nature, quality, and degree of the wrong done, that reparation may be made to the party injured, and others deterred from doing the like; either an eye shall go for an eye, or the forfeited eye shall be redeemed by a sum of money. Note, He that does wrong must expect one way or other to receive according to the wrong he has done, Col 3:25. God sometimes brings men's violent dealings upon their own heads (Psa 7:16); and magistrates are in this the ministers of the justice, that they are avengers (Rom 13:4), and they shall not bear the sword in vain.
II. The care God took of servants. If their masters maimed them, though it was only striking out a tooth, that should be their discharge, Exo 21:26, Exo 21:27. This was intended, 1. To prevent their being abused; masters would be careful not to offer them any violence, lest they should lose their service. 2. To comfort them if they were abused; the loss of a limb should be the gaining of their liberty, which would do something towards balancing both the pain and disgrace they underwent. Nay,
III. Does God take care for oxen? Yes, it appears by the following laws in this chapter that he does, for our sakes, Co1 9:9, Co1 9:10. The Israelites are here directed what to do,
1.In case of hurt done by oxen, or any other brute-creature; for the law, doubtless, was designed to extend to all parallel cases. (1.) As an instance of God's care of the life of man (though forfeited a thousand times into the hands of divine justice), and in token of his detestation of the sin of murder. If an ox killed any man, woman, or child, the ox was to be stoned (Exo 21:28); and, because the greatest honour of the inferior creatures is to be serviceable to man, the criminal is denied that honour: his flesh shall not be eaten. Thus God would keep up in the minds of his people a rooted abhorrence of the sin of murder and every thing that was barbarous. (2.) To make men careful that none of their cattle might do hurt, but that, by all means possible, mischief might be prevented. If the owner of the beast knew that he was mischievous, he must answer for the hurt done, and, according as the circumstances of the case proved him to be more or less accessory, he must either be put to death or ransom his life with a sum of money, Exo 21:29-32. Some of our ancient books make this felony, by the common law of England, and give this reason, "The owner, by suffering his beast to go at liberty when he knew it to be mischievous, shows that he was very willing that hurt should be done." Note, It is not enough for us not to do mischief ourselves, but we must take care that no mischief be done by those whom it is in our power to restrain, whether man or beast.
2.In case of hurt done to oxen, or other cattle. (1.) If they fall into a pit, and perish there, he that opened the pit must make good the loss, Exo 21:33, Exo 21:34. Note, We must take heed not only of doing that which will be hurtful, but of doing that which may be so. It is not enough not to design and devise mischief, but we must contrive to prevent mischief, else we become accessory to our neighbours' damage. Mischief done in malice is the great transgression; but mischief done through negligence, and for want of due care and consideration, is not without fault, but ought to be reflected upon with great regret, according as the degree of the mischief is: especially we must be careful that we do nothing to make ourselves accessory to the sins of others, by laying an occasion of offence in our brother's way, Rom 14:13. (2.) If cattle fight, and one kill another, the owners shall equally share in the loss, Exo 21:35. Only if the beast that had done the harm was known to the owner to have been mischievous he shall answer for the damage, because he ought either to have killed him or kept him up, Exo 21:36. The determinations of these cases carry with them the evidence of their own equity, and give such rules of justice as were then, and are still, in use, for the decision of similar controversies that arise between man and man. But I conjecture that these cases might be specified, rather than others (though some of them seem minute), because they were then cases in fact actually depending before Moses; for in the wilderness where they lay closely encamped, and had their flocks and herds among them, such mischiefs as these last mentioned were likely enough to occur. That which we are taught by these laws is that we should be very careful to do no wrong, either directly or indirectly; and that, if we have done wrong, we must be very willing to make satisfaction, and desirous that nobody may lose by us.
Continue studying Exodus 21:25 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Exodus 21:25 articulates a foundational principle of proportionate justice, often termed Lex Talionis, within the Covenant Code. This verse specifies that penalties for physical injuries—such as burns, wounds, and stripes—must be strictly equivalent to the harm inflicted. Far from advocating for literal, brutal retaliation, this principle served as a crucial legal safeguard in ancient Israel, designed to limit excessive vengeance, promote equity before the law, and establish a clear framework for fair compensation and judicial order within the community.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: Exodus 21:25 is an integral part of the Covenant Code, a comprehensive body of civil and ceremonial laws delivered by God to Moses immediately following the Ten Commandments (found in Exodus 20:22-23:33). This section marks a transition from the broad moral principles of the Decalogue to their specific, practical application in the daily life and legal disputes of the Israelite community. Specifically, verses 22-25 address cases of personal injury, particularly those resulting from altercations, including harm to pregnant women. The broader principle of "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" is famously stated in Exodus 21:24, serving as the immediate antecedent and overarching declaration to which verse 25 provides concrete examples of physical harm. The inclusion of such detailed legal provisions underscores the divine emphasis on justice, order, and the protection of individuals within God's covenant relationship with His people.
Historical & Cultural Context: The concept of Lex Talionis was not unique to ancient Israel; similar principles of proportionate retribution are evident in other ancient Near Eastern (ANE) law codes, such as the Code of Hammurabi (c. 1754 BC) and the Laws of Eshnunna. However, the Mosaic Law, while sharing this foundational principle, applied it with distinct theological and social nuances. Unlike some ANE codes that prescribed varying penalties based on social status, the Mosaic Law generally applied its principles of justice equally to all members of the community, regardless of their wealth or origin (compare Leviticus 24:22). Crucially, the practical application of "burning for burning, wound for wound" in Israelite jurisprudence was typically understood not as a command for literal physical mutilation, but as a guideline for monetary compensation. This compensation would cover damages, medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. This interpretation was vital for limiting private vengeance, preventing escalating blood feuds, and ensuring that justice was administered through a recognized legal system rather than individual retaliation, thereby reflecting God's desire for a just, orderly, and compassionate society.
Key Themes: Exodus 21:25 contributes significantly to several key themes within the broader book of Exodus and the Pentateuch. Foremost among these is the theme of Divine Justice and Righteousness. God, as the ultimate Lawgiver, establishes a legal system that reflects His own character of fairness and equity, ensuring that wrongs are addressed justly and that victims receive appropriate redress. This principle also highlights the Sanctity of Human Life and Bodily Integrity, affirming that harm to an individual is a serious offense requiring a measured response. Furthermore, the Lex Talionis principle underscores the theme of Order and Stability in Society. By providing clear guidelines for punishment and compensation, it prevented chaos and vigilante justice, fostering a stable community under God's covenant. It also implicitly touches upon Limitation of Vengeance, as the law's primary purpose was to restrict retaliation to a proportionate degree, preventing an endless cycle of escalating retribution. This is a crucial distinction from unchecked personal vengeance, which the law aims to curb.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in Exodus 21:25 is Repetition, specifically a form of Parallelism known as Anaphora, where the same grammatical structure ("X for X") is repeated at the beginning of successive clauses. This repeated structure—"burning for burning," "wound for wound," "stripe for stripe"—creates a powerful rhetorical effect, emphasizing the principle of exact correspondence and proportionality. This makes the law clear, memorable, and seemingly absolute, underscoring the idea of a balanced scale of justice where the penalty precisely matches the offense. Furthermore, the verse employs a form of Merism by listing specific examples of physical harm ("burning," "wound," "stripe"). While not a complete merism (which would cover all possibilities by naming extremes), these specific terms collectively represent the broader category of all possible physical injuries, indicating that the principle of Lex Talionis applies comprehensively to any bodily harm. The concise, aphoristic nature of the verse also makes it a powerful and easily recalled legal maxim, designed for clarity and easy understanding within the community.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Exodus 21:25, as part of the Lex Talionis, profoundly reveals God's character as a God of justice, order, and equity. This principle was not designed to promote vengeance but rather to limit it, ensuring that punishment was proportionate to the offense and preventing the escalation of blood feuds. It established a framework for fair legal proceedings, where restitution and compensation were prioritized, reflecting God's desire for a society grounded in righteousness and the protection of the vulnerable. The law underscores the sanctity of human life and bodily integrity, affirming that harm to one individual demands a just and measured response, administered through a divinely ordained system rather than private retribution. This reflects God's commitment to both victim and offender, ensuring fairness for all.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
While the New Testament introduces a higher ethic of radical love, forgiveness, and turning the other cheek in personal relationships, the underlying principle of proportionate justice in Exodus 21:25 remains profoundly relevant for understanding God's character and the foundational requirements for a just society. This ancient law informs modern legal systems that strive for fair sentencing, appropriate compensation for victims, and the prevention of cruel or excessive punishment. It reminds us that justice is a divine attribute, and the pursuit of equity in our communities is a reflection of God's heart. For believers, it calls us to advocate for systems that uphold fairness, protect the vulnerable, and ensure accountability, even as we personally extend grace and reconciliation in our individual interactions. It's a reminder that while grace abounds, justice is a non-negotiable pillar of God's moral universe, ensuring that society functions with order and that the dignity of every person is upheld. We are called to embody both divine justice and divine mercy in our lives.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Is "an eye for an eye" (and by extension, "burning for burning") meant to be taken literally in the Mosaic Law?
Answer: While the phrasing sounds literal and severe, in ancient Israelite legal practice and Jewish tradition, the principle of "an eye for an eye, tooth for tooth, burning for burning" was primarily interpreted as a guideline for monetary compensation rather than a command for literal physical mutilation. Its main purpose was to ensure that the punishment or compensation was proportionate to the injury, preventing either excessive vengeance or insufficient restitution. It limited private retribution and ensured that justice was administered through the courts, often through financial penalties that covered medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering. This understanding prevented escalating blood feuds and promoted a more orderly and compassionate legal system.
How does this law differ from other ancient Near Eastern laws that also contained Lex Talionis principles?
Answer: While the concept of Lex Talionis was common in the ancient Near East (e.g., the Code of Hammurabi), the Mosaic Law distinguished itself in several key ways. Firstly, the Mosaic Law applied the principle of justice equally to all members of society, regardless of social status, whereas some ANE codes prescribed harsher penalties for offenses against higher-ranking individuals. This reflects God's impartial justice. Secondly, as noted, the Mosaic Law's application of Lex Talionis was generally understood as requiring monetary compensation, thereby limiting literal physical retaliation and preventing escalating blood feuds. This reflects a more compassionate and orderly approach to justice, emphasizing restitution and the preservation of life, consistent with God's covenant with Israel. The focus was on limiting vengeance and establishing a just system under God's authority, rather than encouraging brutal retaliation.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Exodus 21:25, with its emphasis on proportionate justice, finds its ultimate fulfillment and reinterpretation in Jesus Christ. While the Old Testament law established a necessary framework for societal order and limited human vengeance, Jesus elevated the principle in the New Covenant. In His Sermon on the Mount, Jesus directly addresses the Lex Talionis, stating, "You have heard that it was said, 'An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.' But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also" (Matthew 5:38-39). This teaching does not abolish the Old Testament's foundational truth about justice but recontextualizes it for personal ethics, moving from external legal compliance to an internal disposition of radical love, forgiveness, and non-retaliation, particularly for believers. However, Jesus did not come to destroy the Law but to fulfill it (Matthew 5:17). The principle of divine justice, which demands a "wound for wound" for sin, is perfectly satisfied in Christ. He, the sinless Lamb of God, willingly bore the "stripes" (Isaiah 53:5) and the ultimate "wound" of humanity's sin on the cross, taking upon Himself the just penalty that we deserved. Through His atoning sacrifice, the divine requirement for justice was met, allowing for the outpouring of God's mercy and grace upon all who believe (Romans 3:25-26). Thus, Christ is the perfect embodiment of both justice and mercy, fulfilling the spirit of the law by demonstrating that true justice is not merely about equal retribution, but about the redemptive power of sacrificial love that reconciles humanity to God and provides a path to eternal life through His perfect sacrifice (2 Corinthians 5:21).