Skip to content
“The Certainty of Cause and Effect”· Amos 3:3–8
Translation
King James Version
Can two walk together, except they be agreed?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Can two H8147 walk H3212 together H3162, except H1115 they be agreed H3259?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Do two people travel together without having so agreed?
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Can two walk together without agreeing where to go?
Ask
American Standard Version
Shall two walk together, except they have agreed?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Do two walk together, unless they have agreed?
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Can two walke together except they bee agreed?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Do two walk together if they have not met?
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 22,399 of 31,102 · 72.0%

Study This Verse

Summary

Amos 3:3 presents a profound rhetorical question, "Can two walk together, except they be agreed?", serving as a foundational principle within Amos's prophetic message to the Northern Kingdom of Israel. This verse encapsulates the essential truth that genuine fellowship, partnership, or a shared journey necessitates a fundamental alignment of purpose, direction, and will. In its immediate context, it highlights the irreconcilable disparity between God's holy character and covenant expectations, and Israel's persistent disobedience, idolatry, and social injustice, thereby justifying the impending divine judgment.

Context

Literary Context

Amos 3 opens with a direct address to "the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt," immediately establishing Israel's unique covenant relationship with Yahweh. Verse 2, "You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities," sets the stage by affirming God's special, intimate knowledge of Israel, which paradoxically necessitates judgment for their unfaithfulness. Amos 3:3 then introduces the first of several rhetorical questions (3:3-6) that function as a series of undeniable cause-and-effect statements, demonstrating the logical necessity of God's actions. These questions are designed to elicit an obvious "no" or "yes" answer, compelling the audience to acknowledge the inevitable consequences of their actions and the justness of God's impending judgment. The "walking together" of verse 3 is a metaphor for a shared journey or relationship, implying that Israel's lack of agreement with God's will makes their continued "walk" with Him impossible, thus explaining the coming divine reckoning.

Historical & Cultural Context

The prophet Amos ministered to the Northern Kingdom of Israel during the prosperous reign of Jeroboam II (c. 793-753 BC). Despite outward national strength and economic stability, this era was marked by profound spiritual decay and social injustice. The people had largely abandoned the covenant stipulations given at Mount Sinai, engaging in widespread idolatry (worship of golden calves at Bethel and Dan, and Baal worship), gross immorality, and oppression of the poor and vulnerable. Amos, a shepherd and fig-picker from Tekoa in Judah (Amos 1:1), was called by God to deliver a stern message of judgment to this complacent and unfaithful nation. His prophecies often contrasted Israel's privileged status as God's chosen people with their egregious violations of the covenant, emphasizing that their unique relationship with God demanded a higher standard of faithfulness, not immunity from judgment.

Key Themes

Amos 3:3 contributes significantly to several overarching themes in the book of Amos. Foremost is the theme of Covenant Faithfulness and Judgment. God's "knowing" of Israel (Amos 3:2) refers to a covenantal relationship, implying mutual obligations. Israel's failure to uphold their end of the covenant, particularly their rampant injustice and idolatry, meant they were no longer "agreed" with God, making judgment an inevitable consequence of their rebellion. This verse also underscores the theme of Divine Sovereignty and Justice, portraying God as actively involved in the affairs of His people, holding them accountable for their actions. The rhetorical questions highlight God's righteous character and the logical progression of His judgment. Furthermore, it speaks to the Nature of True Fellowship, emphasizing that any genuine relationship, especially with a holy God, demands alignment of will, purpose, and character. The inability of two to "walk together" without agreement foreshadows the coming separation and exile that would befall Israel due to their persistent unfaithfulness, as detailed throughout Amos's prophecies.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

walk yâlak' H3212

This primitive root signifies movement, often in a literal sense of physical progression, but frequently used metaphorically to describe one's conduct, manner of life, or relationship. Here, it denotes a shared journey or ongoing relationship. To "walk with God" (as in Genesis 5:24) implies intimate communion, shared purpose, and alignment of direction.

together yachad' H3162

Derived from a root meaning "a unit," this word emphasizes unity, solidarity, or being united. It speaks to a shared existence or action, implying a common path or destination. In the context of the verse, it highlights the impossibility of maintaining a unified journey or relationship when the parties involved are not in accord.

agreed yâʻad' H3259

This root means "to fix upon by agreement or appointment," "to meet at a stated time," or "to summon." It implies a deliberate, intentional coming together based on a prior arrangement, understanding, or common purpose. It's not merely a casual consensus but a pre-established, binding commitment or alignment. The passive form used here ("be agreed") suggests a state of having come to an agreement or having been appointed to meet. For God and Israel, it refers to the terms of the covenant.

Verse Breakdown

"Can two walk together,"

This initial clause poses a rhetorical question, immediately inviting the listener to consider the fundamental nature of partnership and shared journey. The "two" implicitly refers to God and Israel in the immediate context, but the principle is universal. The act of "walking together" signifies an ongoing, sustained relationship, a shared path in life, or a common endeavor. The question's structure implies an obvious negative answer, setting up the condition that follows.

"except they be agreed?"

This concluding clause provides the necessary condition for the "walking together" to occur. The Hebrew word for "agreed" (from yâʻad) carries the connotation of a deliberate appointment, a mutual understanding, or a settled purpose. It's not just a superficial accord but a deep alignment of will, direction, and values. The rhetorical question thus asserts that a shared journey is impossible without such fundamental agreement. In the divine-human relationship, this "agreement" refers to Israel's adherence to the terms of the covenant God established with them, which they had demonstrably violated.

Literary Devices

Amos 3:3 powerfully employs several literary devices to convey its message. The primary device is a Rhetorical Question, which is a question asked not to elicit an answer but to make a point or to produce an effect. By posing "Can two walk together, except they be agreed?", Amos compels his audience to acknowledge the self-evident truth that partnership requires alignment, thereby leading them to the inescapable conclusion about their own fractured relationship with God. This question also functions as a Metaphor, where "walking together" symbolizes a relationship or a shared journey. The physical act of walking side-by-side represents the spiritual and covenantal fellowship between God and Israel. The inability to walk together without agreement underscores the brokenness of their covenant relationship. Furthermore, the "two" can be seen as a form of Synecdoche, where a part (two individuals) stands for the whole (any parties in a relationship or partnership), making the principle universally applicable beyond the immediate context of God and Israel.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Amos 3:3 articulates a profound theological truth about the nature of relationship, particularly between a holy God and His covenant people. It underscores that God's character demands a reciprocal response of faithfulness and obedience from those with whom He enters into covenant. The "agreement" is not a negotiation of terms, but an acknowledgment and submission to God's revealed will and righteous standards. Israel's persistent idolatry, social injustice, and moral corruption demonstrated a fundamental disagreement with God's character and covenant, making continued fellowship impossible without divine intervention (judgment). This principle reveals God's unwavering justice and His commitment to the integrity of His own character, showing that He cannot "walk" in partnership with unrighteousness. It highlights that true spiritual communion requires a shared moral compass and a unified purpose, ultimately rooted in God's holiness.

Reflection and Application

The timeless truth embedded in Amos 3:3 resonates deeply with both our individual walk with God and our human relationships. For the believer, "walking with God" implies an intentional, daily alignment of our will, desires, and actions with His revealed Word and the leading of His Spirit. When our lives are characterized by unconfessed sin, disobedience, or a pursuit of worldly values that contradict God's commands, we are, in essence, out of "agreement" with Him, and our fellowship becomes hindered. This verse calls us to a radical self-examination: are we truly seeking to walk in step with God, or are we charting our own course? It reminds us that spiritual intimacy is not passive; it requires active submission and a conscious decision to meet God on His terms. In our human relationships—especially marriage, friendships, and partnerships—the principle holds equally true. Shared values, mutual respect, clear communication, and a common purpose are indispensable for a healthy, sustainable connection. Disagreement on fundamental issues or a lack of shared vision inevitably leads to friction, distance, and potential separation. This verse challenges us to cultivate intentional agreement in all our relationships, prioritizing unity and shared purpose.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what areas of my life might I be out of "agreement" with God's revealed will or character?
  2. What practical steps can I take to better align my daily walk with God's purposes and commands?
  3. How does the principle of "agreement" apply to my most significant human relationships (e.g., marriage, family, church community)?
  4. What might be the consequences in my life if I continue to walk in disagreement with God?

FAQ

What does "agreed" mean in the context of Amos 3:3?

In Amos 3:3, "agreed" (from the Hebrew yâʻad) signifies more than just a casual consensus. It refers to a deliberate, intentional coming together based on a prior appointment, mutual understanding, or a settled, common purpose. For God and Israel, it points to the terms of the covenant established between them. Israel's unfaithfulness and disobedience demonstrated a fundamental breach of this "agreement," making their continued "walk" or fellowship with God impossible without divine intervention or judgment. It implies a shared direction, values, and commitment.

Is Amos 3:3 only about God and Israel, or does it have broader application?

While the immediate context of Amos 3:3 is indeed the relationship between God and His covenant people, Israel, the principle it articulates is universally applicable. The rhetorical question is designed to highlight a self-evident truth about the nature of any shared journey or relationship. Whether it's a marriage, a business partnership, a friendship, or a church community, genuine and sustainable fellowship requires a fundamental alignment of purpose, values, and will. The verse serves as a timeless wisdom principle, demonstrating that divergence in these areas inevitably leads to discord and separation. It underscores the importance of seeking unity and shared vision in all our relationships, both with God and with others, as seen in passages like Ephesians 4:3.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Amos 3:3, with its emphasis on the necessity of agreement for a shared walk, finds its ultimate and most profound fulfillment in Jesus Christ. Humanity, separated from God by sin, was fundamentally out of "agreement" with His holy nature and righteous demands. The Old Covenant, though revealing God's will, could not bridge this chasm because of humanity's inability to perfectly fulfill its terms. However, Christ, as the perfect Lamb of God, entered into our human condition, perfectly fulfilling the Law and offering Himself as the atoning sacrifice for sin. Through His death and resurrection, Jesus inaugurated the New Covenant, making it possible for humanity to be reconciled to God and once again "walk together" with Him. He is the "Way, the Truth, and the Life" (as declared in John 14:6), and it is only through Him that we can come into agreement with God. By grace, through faith in Christ, believers are justified and receive the Holy Spirit, who indwells them, enabling them to walk in newness of life (as described in Romans 6:4). This spiritual union with Christ means our will is progressively aligned with God's, allowing for true fellowship and a shared journey with the Father, a peace that was once impossible (as found in Romans 5:1). Thus, Jesus is the very means by which the two—God and humanity—can finally walk together in perfect agreement.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Amos 3:1–8. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 8 verses
Passage under commentAmos 3:1–8
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

The scope of these verses is to convince the people of Israel that God had a controversy with them. That which the prophet has to say to them is to let them know that the Lord has something to say against them, Amo 3:1. They were his peculiar people above others, knew his name, and were called by it; nevertheless he had something against them, and they were called to hear what it was, that they might consider what answer they should make, as the prisoner at the bar is told to hearken to his indictment. The children of Israel would not regard the words of counsel and comfort that God had many a time spoken to them, and now they shall be made to hear the word of reproof and threatening that the Lord has spoken against them; for he will act as he has spoken.

I.Let them know that the gracious cognizance God has taken of them, and the favours he has bestowed upon them, should not exempt them from the punishment due to them for their sins. Israel is a family that God brought up out of the land of Egypt, (Amo 3:1), and it was no more than a family when it went down thither; thence God delivered it; thence he fetched it to be a family to himself. It is not only the ten tribes, the kingdom of Israel, that must take notice of this, but that of Judah also, for it is spoken against the whole family that God brought up out of Egypt. It is a family that God has bestowed distinguishing favours upon, has owned in a peculiar manner. You only have I known of all the families of the earth. Note, God's church in the world is a family dignified above all the families of the earth. Those that know God are known of him. In Judah is God known, and therefore Judah is more than any people known of God. God has known them, that is, he has chosen them, covenanted with them, and conversed with them as his acquaintance. Now, one would think, it should follow, "Therefore I will spare you, will connive at your faults, and excuse you." No: Therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities. Note, The distinguishing favours of God to us, if they do not serve to restrain us from sin, shall not serve to exempt us from punishment; nay, the nearer any are to God in profession, and the kinder notice he has taken of them, the more surely, the more quickly, and the more severely will he reckon with them, if they by a course of wilful sin profane their character, disgrace their relation to him, violate their engagements, and put a slight upon the favours and honours with which they have been distinguished. Therefore they shall be punished, because their sins dishonour him, affront him, and grieve him, more than the sins of others, and because it is necessary that God should vindicate his own honour by making it appear that he hates sin and hates it most in those that are nearest to him; if they be but as bad as others, they shall be punished worse than others, because it is justly expected that they should be so much better than others. Judgment begins at the house of God, begins at the sanctuary; for God will be sanctified either by or upon those that come nigh unto him, Lev 10:3.

II.Let them know that they could not expect any comfortable communion with God unless they first made their peace with him (Amo 3:3):

Can two walk together except they be agreed? No; how should they? Where there is not friendship there can be no fellowship; if two persons be at variance, they must first accommodate the matters in difference between them before there can be any interchanging of good offices. Israel has affronted God, had broken their covenant with him, and ill-requited his favours to them; and yet they expected that he should continue to walk with them, should take their part, act for them, and give them assurances of his presence with them, though they took no care by repentance and reformation to agree with their adversary and to turn away his wrath. "But how can that be?" says God. "While you continue to walk contrary to God you can look for no other than that he should walk contrary to you," Lev 26:23, Lev 26:24. Note, We cannot expect that God should be present with us, or act for us, unless we be reconciled to him. God and man cannot walk together except they be agreed. Unless we agree with God in our end, which is his glory, we cannot walk with him by the way.

III.Let them know that the warnings God gave them of judgments approaching were not causeless and groundless, merely to amuse them, but certain declarations of the wrath of God against them, which (if they did not speedily repent) they would infallibly feel the effects of (Amo 3:4): "Will a lion roar in the forest when he has no prey in view? No: he roars upon his prey. Nor will a young lion cry out of his den if the old lion have taken nothing to bring home to him; nor would God thus give you warning both by the threatenings of his word, and by less judgments, if you had not by your sins made yourselves a prey to his wrath, nor if he were not really about to fall upon you with desolating destroying judgments." Note, The threatenings of the word and providence of God are not bugbears, to frighten children and fools, but are certain inferences from the sin of man and certain presages of the judgments of God.

IV.Let them know that, as their own wickedness was the procuring cause of these judgments, so they shall not be removed till they have done their work, Amo 3:5. When God has come forth to contend with a sinful people it is necessary that they should understand,

1.That it is their own sin that has entangled them; for can a bird fall in a snare upon the earth where no gin is for him? No, nature does not lay snares for the creatures, but the art of men; a bird is not taken in a snare by chance, but with the fowler's design; so the providence of God prepares trouble for sinners, and it is in the work of their own hands that they are snared. Affliction does not spring out of the dust, but it is God's justice, and our own wickedness, that correct us.

2.It is nothing but their own repentance that can disentangle them; for shall one take up a snare from the earth, which he laid with design, except he have taken something as he designed? So neither will God remove the affliction he has sent till it have done its work and accomplished that for which he sent it. If our hearts be duly humbled, and we are brought by our afflictions to confess and forsake our sins, then the snare has taken something, then the point is gained, the end is answered, and then, and not till then, the snare is broken, is taken up from the earth, and we are delivered in love and mercy.

V.Let them know that all their troubles came from the hand of God's providence and from the counsel of his will (Amo 3:6):

Shall there be evil in a city, in a family, in a nation, and the Lord has not done it, appointed it, and performed what he appointed? The evil of sin is from ourselves; it is our own doing. But the evil of trouble, personal or public, is from God, and is his doing; whoever are the instruments, God is the principal agent. Out of his mouth both evil and good proceed. This consideration, that, whatever evil is in the city, the Lord has done it, should engage us patiently to bear our share in public calamities and to study to answer God's intention in them.

VI.Let them know that their prophets, who give them warning of judgments approaching, deliver nothing to them but what they have received from the Lord to be delivered to his people.

1.God makes it known beforehand to the prophets (Amo 3:7): Surely the Lord Jehovah will do nothing, none of that evil in the city spoken of (Amo 3:6), but he reveals it to his servants the prophets, though to others it is a secret. Therefore those know not what they do who make light of the warnings which the prophets give them, in God's name. Observe, God's prophets are his servants, whom he employs to go on his errands to the children of men. The secret of God is with them; it is in some sense with all the righteous (Pro 3:32), with all that fear God (Psa 25:14), but in a peculiar manner with the prophets, to whom the Spirit of prophecy is a Spirit of revelation. It would have put honour enough upon prophets if it had been only said that sometimes God is pleased to reveal to his prophets what he designs to do, but it speaks something very great to say that he does nothing but what he reveals to them, as if they were the men of his counsel. Shall I hide from Abraham, who is a prophet, the thing which I do? Gen 18:17. God will therefore be sure to reckon with those that put contempt on the prophets, whom he puts this honour upon.

2.The prophets cannot but make that known to the people which God has made known to them (Amo 3:8): The Lord God has spoken; who can but prophesy? His prophets, to whom he has spoken in secret by dreams and visions, cannot but speak in public to the people what they have heard from God. They are so full of those things themselves, so well assured concerning them, and so much affected with them, that they cannot but speak of them; for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth will speak. I believed; therefore have I spoken, Act 4:20. Nay, and besides the prophetic impulse which went along with the inspiration, and made the word like a fire in their bones (Jer 20:9), they received a command from God to deliver what they had been charged with; and they would have been false to their trust if they had not done it. Necessity was laid upon them, as upon the preachers of the gospel, Co1 9:16.

VII.Let them know that they ought to tremble before God upon the fair warning he had given them, as they would,

1.Upon the sounding of a trumpet, to give notice of the approach of the enemy, that all may stand upon their guard and stand to their arms: Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people be not afraid, or run together? so some read it, Amo 3:6. Will they not immediately come together in a fright, to consider what is best to be done for the common safety? Yet when God by his prophets gives them notice of their danger, and summons them to come and enlist themselves under his banner, it makes no impression; they will sooner give credit to a watchman on their walls than to a prophet sent of God, will sooner obey the summons of the governor of their city than the orders given them by the Governor of the world. God says, Hearken to the voice of the trumpet; but they will not hearken, nay, and they tell him plainly that they will not, Jer 6:17.

2.Upon the roaring of a lion. God is sometimes as a lion, and a young lion, to the house of Judah, Hos 5:14. The lion roars before he tears; thus God warns before he wounds. If therefore the lion roars upon a poor traveller (as he did against Samson, Jdg 14:5), he cannot but be put into great consternation; yet the Lord roars out of Zion (Amo 1:2), and none are afraid, but they go on securely as if they were in no danger. Note, The fair warning given to a careless world, if it be not taken, will aggravate its condemnation another day. The lion roared, and they were not moved with fear to prepare an ark. O the amazing stupidity of an unbelieving world, that will not be wrought upon, no, not by the terrors of the Lord!

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

3 quotes · AD 420–458
Post-Nicene
400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceCommentary on Amos
(Verse 3 onwards) Will two walk together unless they have agreed? Does a lion roar in the forest unless it has prey? Does a lion's cub give a cry from its den without capturing something? Does a bird fall into a trap on the ground without a trapper? Does a trap spring up from the ground before catching something? If a trumpet is blown in a city, will not the people be afraid? If there is calamity in a city, has not the Lord caused it? For the Lord God does nothing without revealing his secret to his servants the prophets. The lion roars, who will not fear? The Lord God has spoken, who will not prophesy? Amos: If two shall walk together, except they know each other? If the lion shall roar in his den, having no prey? If the lion's cub gives forth its voice from its lair, unless it has taken something? If a bird falls to the ground without a fowler? If a snare is laid upon the ground, unless it has caught something? If the trumpet sounds in the city, and the people do not fear? If there is wickedness in the city that the Lord did not make, because the Lord God will not do anything unless He reveals His teaching to His servant prophets. Will a lion roar, and who will not fear? The Lord God has spoken, and who will not prophesy? I read in the commentaries of someone who desired to convince of a difficult matter, about eight crimes, wickednesses, and sins: first, Damascus; second, Gaza, and the other cities of Palestine; third, Tyre; fourth, Edom; fifth, the sons of Ammon; sixth, Moab; seventh, Judah, that is, the two tribes; eighth, which is the last, Israel, that is, the ten tribes, with the same number of judgments, now given, and the first answering the first, that is, Damascus, the second answering the second, that is, Gaza, and the rest answering the rest. The one who wrote it knows whether it is true or not. However, another person thinks that the six examples given, of two people walking together on a road, and a lion roaring while leaping, and a lion cub making its voice when it catches something, and a bird caught by a bird catcher, and a snare set in the ground for catching prey, and a trumpet sounding in the city, and with these examples, a similar argument is given, that just as the previous things have a cause and do not happen unless those things have preceded them: likewise, no evil occurs in the city that has not been done by the Lord's command. There are those who consider the first example to contain doctrine, because two cannot walk together unless they have agreed to do so beforehand. He who made both one, and destroyed the middle wall of partition, and created of the two one new man (Ephesians 2): and made peace between them, and joined them together with the bond of charity, so that when they are together, the two may ask the Father and obtain whatever they have requested. These are the two sticks that are joined together in Ezekiel (Ezek. VII), and the two peoples, the circumcision and the Gentiles, about whom the Lord speaks to Elijah: I have left for myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee before Baal (3 Kings XIX, 18). And in another place, God says: I was found by those who did not seek me; I appeared to those who did not ask for me (Isaiah LXV, 1). But when the two are brought together, they will cling to the Lord, and they will become one spirit: for he who clings to the Lord is one spirit (1 Cor. VI, 17). Therefore, these two who agree with each other and walk together in the way of Christ, cannot fear the attack of any adversaries. But if they are separated by discord, immediately the roaring lion will invade them, about which Peter the Apostle said: Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour (I Pet. 5:8). This roaring lion does not roam in cultivated fields, nor among vineyards, nor in olive groves, nor among fruit-bearing trees which praise God; but where there are forests and uncultivated ground, and where wild beasts dwell. And not only will they be exposed to the bites of the lion, but the lion cub will capture them and lead them to its den, fleeing from the light and going towards darkness. For everyone who sins loves darkness and hates the light (John 3), as we read in the psalm: You have set darkness, and it has become night: in it all the beasts of the forest will roam. The lion cubs roaring, to snatch and seek food from God (Psalm 104). For the lion cub seeks not the prey which it possesses and is under its power; but that it may snatch from the Church of Christ, of which it is written in Habakkuk: Its choice food (Hab. 1:16). The third punishment is for those whom discord has separated, that they lose their wings, on which they were previously carried aloft, and fall from heaven to earth, and are caught by the birdcatcher, who is better called the fowler, because he catches birds that are entangled in birdlime, which have descended willingly to earthly things. About which it is written in Proverbs: 'The nets are not unjustly spread for the birds' (Prov. I, 17, and XXIX, 5). For it is a just punishment for sinners, who, having the wings of doves, ought to fly through the air, that they are weighed down by the burden of sins and are brought down to earth, sticking to their vices. Concerning this, we read in the Apostle: 'He who joins himself to a harlot becomes one body with her' (I Cor. VI, 16). The fourth punishment is for those who are in discord, so that they are caught in a snare not set in heaven, but on earth. Regarding this, the holy one rejoices and says: 'Our soul has been delivered as a sparrow from the snare of the hunters; the snare has been broken, and we have been set free' (Ps. CXXIII, 7). This is the broken snare, of which the Apostle speaks to believers: God will crush Satan beneath your feet quickly (Rom. XVI, 20). And again in David we read: They have set a stumbling block on my path (Ps. CXXXVI, 6). For they cannot deceive the simple ones of the believers unless they propose the name of Christ, so that while we think we find Christ, we may go on to the Antichrist. The fifth punishment is for those who have forsaken the peace, which surpasses all understanding (Philipp. IV), and which the Lord, going to the Father, left to the Apostles, saying: My peace I give to you, my peace I leave with you (John XIV, 27), so that as citizens of the Lord, they are terrified by the sound of the trumpet. For whatever is said in the Holy Scriptures, it is like a threatening trumpet, penetrating the ears of believers with a loud voice. If we are righteous, we are provoked to blessedness through the trumpet of Christ; if we are sinners, we hear what torments we will suffer. However, the evil that the Lord does in a city is not contrary to virtue, but it is affliction and torment, as we read: Each day has enough trouble of its own (Matthew 6:34), that is, tribulation and distress. And in the Prophet, we read: I am God who made light and darkness, who brings peace and creates evil (Isaiah XLV, 6, 7). Just as darkness is contrary to light and day, so war is contrary to peace, which in itself is not evil, but seems evil to those who suffer it. And so we know, from the holy Scriptures, that sometimes wickedness is not opposed to virtue, but is rather affliction, punishment, and distress. Let us take one more example from Jonah: And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil ways, and he repented of the evil which he had said that he would do unto them (Jonah III, 10). Surely there is the evil overthrow of the Ninevites, which God had threatened through the prophet, and it is not contrary to virtue, which pertains to sin, for which He threatened torment to sinners. It follows: The Lord God will not do a word unless He has revealed His secret, or His correction, to His servant prophets: not that God reveals to the prophets all that He does in heaven, or has already done before; but what He is about to do on earth. Noah revealed to his servant that he would bring a flood. Abraham and Lot revealed to their servants that Sodom and Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboiim would be destroyed. Joseph revealed the interpretation of a dream of seven years of famine in Egypt. And Jonah revealed the destruction of Nineveh, so that those who heard of the coming punishments would either repent and avoid torment, or those who ignored them would be justly punished. And now the Lord reveals through his servant and prophet Amos what he will do to the ten tribes, that if they are converted to better things and forsake their idols, they may be delivered from the impending danger. And note that the merciful and gracious God always foretells the future so that he is not compelled to inflict punishments. And as for the heretics who slander the Creator as if he were severe and harsh, cruel and only a judge, because there is no evil in the state that he does not do, we refer this to the greatness of his mercy, that he does not inflict punishments unless he has foretold them beforehand. But whoever predicts does not want to punish the sinners. The lion, he says, will roar, and who will not be afraid? The Lord God has spoken, who will not prophesy? Who in this place is not accepted as being for the rare, but not for the impossible. For he who disregards the Lord due to his own stubbornness will not be afraid and will not prophesy. And the meaning is according to the story: if everything trembles at the voice of the lion, and all the nature of animals is frightened, shall we, by God's command to speak and announce to the people the coming punishments, not prophesy? Shall we not speak? I know that someone has written in his Commentaries about a roaring lion to be understood as the devil, and roaring towards those who are about to perish: but God, who speaks through the Prophets, should be referred to the Lord Savior, just as those who hear the roaring of the lion in a bad way and are captured unto death, so the holy ones should hear the Lord commanding in a good way and be saved.
He therefore accuses them, because they claimed that the prophets from Him did not convey words from above and from God; but rather they thought that things were being uttered from their own opinion, and that they were speaking things different from what seemed good to the Lord of all. For this reason He says, O foolish and senseless ones, will any of you become friends and walk the same path of life, not having known yourselves, or rather one another; that is, unless they have seen one another to be of the same character and like-minded? "For every creature loves its like, and a man will cleave to his like." And if this is true, how could I have accepted the prophets, as it were, into friendship and love, being holy Myself, if they too had not become holy? How then do you persecute the saints, to whom I have entrusted My words, whom I have accepted as good, as it were walking the same road of My wills? For whatever I might wish, this is also their will. Therefore, to rebuke the prophets is nothing other than to direct the rebuke against Me.
AD 458Theodoret of CyrusPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON AMOS 3:6–8
As it is impossible for two people to share a journey at the same time, he is saying, unless indicating to each other where and why they are traveling, or for a lion to roar if there is no prey, or for a bird to fall without a hunter, or for all the other things mentioned, so it is impossible for any punishment to be imposed without God willing it. He calls punishment “evil,” note, by use of a general custom: we are accustomed to use “troubles” of diseases, chastisements, untimely deaths, famines, wars, and the like, not because they are troublesome by nature but because they are troublesome to human beings and the source of distress and grief.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Amos 3:3 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.