Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Then came he out of the land of the Chaldaeans, and dwelt in Charran: and from thence, when his father was dead, he removed him into this land, wherein ye now dwell.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Then G5119 came he G1831 out of G1537 the land G1093 of the Chaldaeans G5466, and dwelt G2730 in G1722 Charran G5488: and from thence G2547, when G3326 his G846 father G3962 was dead G599, he removed G3351 him G846 into G1519 this G5026 land G1093, wherein G1519 G3739 ye G5210 now G3568 dwell G2730.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
So he left the land of the Kasdim and lived in Haran. After his father died, God made him move to this land where you are living now.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So Abraham left the land of the Chaldeans and settled in Haran. After his father died, God brought him out of that place and into this land where you are now living.
Ask
American Standard Version
Then came he out of the land of the Chaldæans, and dwelt in Haran: and from thence, when his father was dead, God removed him into this land, wherein ye now dwell:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Then he came out of the land of the Kasdim, and lived in Haran. From there, when his father was dead, God moved him into this land, where you are now living.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then came he out of the land of the Chaldeans, and dwelt in Charran. And after that his father was dead, God brought him from thence into this land, wherein ye now dwell,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`Then having come forth out of the land of the Chaldeans, he dwelt in Haran, and from thence, after the death of his father, He did remove him to this land wherein ye now dwell,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Stephen Recites the Histories of the Jews
Stephen Recites the Histories of the Jews View full PDF
Acts 7:1-7
Acts 7:1-7 View full PDF
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 27,121 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Acts 7:4, part of Stephen's defense before the Sanhedrin, meticulously traces Abraham's initial migration from Ur of the Chaldeans to Haran, and then, crucially, his relocation to the promised land of Canaan after his father Terah's death. This verse underscores the precise, divinely orchestrated unfolding of God's covenant plan, emphasizing the stages of Abraham's journey and the sovereign timing involved in establishing the patriarch in the land that would become the inheritance of Israel.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is embedded within Stephen's lengthy and polemical speech in Acts 7, which serves as his defense against accusations of blasphemy against the Temple and the Law. Stephen systematically recounts Israel's history, starting with Abraham, to demonstrate God's consistent presence and activity outside the confines of the Temple and even before the Mosaic Law. He highlights how God initiated His covenant with Abraham in Mesopotamia, long before the land of Israel was fully possessed or the Temple built. Acts 7:2-3 describes God's initial call to Abraham to leave his country and kindred, while Acts 7:5-8 details the promises of land and descendants. Verse 4 specifically bridges the gap between Abraham's initial call in Mesopotamia and his eventual settlement in Canaan, emphasizing a significant transitional period marked by his father's life and death. Stephen uses this historical recounting to challenge his audience's narrow understanding of God's work, implying that their current resistance to Christ mirrors Israel's historical resistance to God's prophets and His broader redemptive plan.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Abraham's journey began in "the land of the Chaldaeans," specifically Ur, a prominent Sumerian city-state in southern Mesopotamia, known for its advanced civilization, ziggurats, and polytheistic worship, particularly of the moon god Nanna. Haran (Charran in Greek) was a major trade city in northern Mesopotamia, situated on the Balikh River, a tributary of the Euphrates. It served as a significant stopping point on the ancient trade routes between Mesopotamia and the Levant. The patriarchal custom of a son remaining with his father until the father's death, or at least until the father's blessing and permission to depart, was common. Terah's decision to take Abraham, Nahor, and Lot from Ur to Haran (Genesis 11:31) suggests a partial obedience to God's call, or perhaps a desire to move closer to the promised land without fully committing to the radical break God demanded of Abraham alone. Stephen's emphasis on Terah's death as the catalyst for Abraham's final move to Canaan highlights the divine timing and the complete separation required for Abraham to fully enter into God's promised inheritance.
  • Key Themes: Acts 7:4 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within Stephen's speech and the book of Acts. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Divine Sovereignty and Guidance, demonstrating how God meticulously orchestrates events and timing in the lives of His chosen servants, even through seemingly mundane family dynamics or geographical movements. Abraham's journey is not random but a divinely directed pilgrimage towards a specific purpose. Secondly, the verse reinforces the theme of Covenant and Promise, as Abraham's relocation to Canaan is a crucial step towards the fulfillment of God's promises regarding land and descendants, foundational to the covenant established in Genesis 12:1-3. The "this land, wherein ye now dwell" phrase directly links the ancient promise to the contemporary reality of Stephen's audience, reminding them of their heritage's divine origin. Lastly, it subtly touches upon the theme of Separation and Obedience, as Abraham's full entry into the promised land is contingent upon a complete break from his past, symbolized by his father's death and the subsequent removal from Haran. This foreshadows the radical commitment required by those who follow God's call, often involving leaving behind familiar comforts and associations, much like the call to discipleship in Matthew 10:37.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • came he out (Greek, exérchomai', G1831): This verb signifies a movement from within to without, indicating a departure or issuing forth. In this context, it emphasizes Abraham's decisive act of leaving his ancestral home in Mesopotamia, a crucial step in his journey of faith and obedience to God's call. It implies a definitive break from his past environment.
  • dwelt (Greek, katoikéō', G2730): This word means "to house permanently" or "to reside." When applied to Abraham's time in Charran, it suggests a period of established residence, albeit one that was temporary in God's larger plan. The subsequent use of the same word for the land "wherein ye now dwell" highlights the contrast between the temporary dwelling in Haran and the permanent, promised dwelling in Canaan.
  • removed (Greek, metoikízō', G3351): This term means "to transfer as a settler or captive," implying a deliberate act of relocation, often with an external agent or purpose. Here, it underscores the divine agency behind Abraham's final move into Canaan, even if the immediate human agent was Abraham himself. It speaks to a purposeful transplantation from one place to another.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Then came he out of the land of the Chaldaeans": This clause describes Abraham's initial departure from Ur of the Chaldeans, a significant act of obedience following God's call. It marks the beginning of his journey, leaving behind the idolatrous culture and familial ties of his birthplace, though he did so initially with his father Terah.
  • "and dwelt in Charran": This indicates an intermediate stop in Abraham's journey. Haran became a place of residence for Abraham and his family for a period, suggesting a pause or delay in the full realization of God's command to go to the land God would show him. This detail aligns with the Genesis account, where Terah settles in Haran.
  • "and from thence, when his father was dead": This phrase highlights a critical turning point and a specific condition for Abraham's next move. Terah's death in Haran is presented as the catalyst that allowed Abraham to fully separate from his past and proceed with God's ultimate directive. It underscores the divine timing and the complete break required for Abraham to enter the promised land.
  • "he removed him into this land, wherein ye now dwell": This final clause describes Abraham's ultimate relocation to Canaan, the land of promise. The phrase "this land, wherein ye now dwell" is a direct and powerful rhetorical device, connecting Abraham's ancient journey to the contemporary location of Stephen's audience, emphasizing the divine origin of their inheritance and the fulfillment of God's long-standing promises. The "he removed him" implies divine agency, even if human action was involved.

Literary Devices

Stephen's use of this verse employs several significant literary devices. The most prominent is Historical Allusion, as he references a foundational event in Israel's history, the migration of Abraham, to establish his theological argument. This serves to connect with his Jewish audience on common ground, even as he reinterprets the significance of these events. There is also a strong element of Emphasis on divine timing, particularly through the precise detail "when his father was dead," which highlights God's sovereign orchestration of events and Abraham's ultimate, complete obedience. Furthermore, the phrase "this land, wherein ye now dwell" functions as a powerful Direct Address and Rhetorical Link, drawing a direct line from Abraham's ancient journey to the present reality of the Sanhedrin, underscoring the divine origin of their very existence in the land and implicitly challenging their current resistance to God's ongoing work.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Acts 7:4 profoundly illustrates the progressive nature of God's redemptive plan and His faithfulness to His covenant promises. It reveals that God's call often involves a journey of faith, marked by stages, transitions, and specific divine timing, rather than an immediate, singular event. Abraham's departure from Ur, his sojourn in Haran, and his final relocation to Canaan after his father's death, all underscore God's sovereign hand guiding His chosen servant towards the fulfillment of promises that would benefit all nations. This historical account serves as a theological foundation for understanding God's patient yet persistent work in history, preparing the way for the ultimate revelation in Christ. It also highlights the theme of separation and radical obedience, where Abraham's full embrace of God's call required a complete break from his past, setting a precedent for the transformative call to discipleship.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Acts 7:4 offers profound insights for contemporary believers navigating their own journeys of faith. Just as Abraham's path involved stages, delays, and specific divine timing, our lives often unfold with periods of waiting, transition, and unexpected turns. This verse reminds us that God's plans are not always linear or immediately clear, but His faithfulness endures through every step. We are called to cultivate a deep trust in God's sovereign timing, understanding that even apparent delays or detours can be integral to His perfect design. Like Abraham, we must be prepared to leave behind familiar comforts, old patterns, or even familial expectations when God calls us to a new place or purpose. The "land wherein ye now dwell" for us is often not a physical place, but the spiritual reality of God's kingdom and our inheritance in Christ. Embracing the journey of faith, with all its uncertainties, requires patient endurance and unwavering confidence that God is actively working to bring about His promises in our lives and through our lives for His glory.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "lands" or familiar comforts might God be calling you to "come out of" in your current season of life?
  • How does Abraham's journey, with its intermediate stops and specific timing, speak to your own experiences of waiting or delayed fulfillment in God's plan?
  • In what ways does this verse challenge you to trust God's sovereignty and timing, even when circumstances seem to pause or divert your path?

FAQ

Why did Abraham dwell in Haran for a period before moving to Canaan?

Answer: The biblical narrative in Genesis 11:31 indicates that Terah, Abraham's father, took Abraham, Lot, and Sarah and "went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldeans to go into the land of Canaan; and they came to Haran and dwelt there." Stephen emphasizes that Abraham only moved into Canaan "when his father was dead." This suggests that Terah's presence or leadership might have influenced the family's prolonged stay in Haran, perhaps due to his age or a partial obedience to God's initial call that fell short of the full commitment required of Abraham. Stephen uses this detail to highlight God's precise timing and the necessity of a complete break for Abraham to fully enter the promised land, underscoring the theme of radical obedience and divine orchestration.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Acts 7:4, though detailing Abraham's physical journey, points forward to the ultimate journey of salvation fulfilled in Jesus Christ. Abraham's obedience in leaving his homeland foreshadows Christ's ultimate act of condescension, leaving the glory of heaven to dwell among humanity, as described in Philippians 2:6-8. Just as Abraham was "removed" into the promised land by divine guidance, so too is humanity, through Christ, "removed" from the land of sin and death into the spiritual inheritance of God's kingdom. The "land wherein ye now dwell" for Stephen's audience was a physical inheritance, but for believers in Christ, it points to the spiritual reality of being "in Christ" and dwelling in the new covenant, where the promises to Abraham find their ultimate "yes" and "amen" in Jesus (2 Corinthians 1:20). Christ is the true Son of Abraham, through whom all the families of the earth are blessed (Galatians 3:16), and His journey from death to resurrection is the ultimate "removal" that opens the way for all who believe to inherit the true promised land—eternal life in God's presence (John 14:2-3).

Copy as

Commentary on Acts 7 verses 1–16

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Stephen is now at the bar before the great council of the nation, indicted for blasphemy: what the witnesses swore against him we had an account of in the foregoing chapter, that he spoke blasphemous words against Moses and God; for he spoke against this holy place and the law. Now here,

I. The high priest calls upon him to answer for himself, Act 7:1. He was president, and, as such, the mouth of the court, and therefore he saith, "You, the prisoner at the bar, you hear what is sworn against you; what do you say to it? Are these things so? Have you ever spoken any words to this purport? If you have, will you recant them, or will you stand to them? Guilty or not guilty?" This carried a show of fairness, and yet seems to have been spoken with an air of haughtiness; and thus far he seems to have prejudged the cause, that, if it were so, that he had spoken such and such words, he shall certainly be adjudged a blasphemer, whatever he may offer in justification or explanation of them.

II. He begins his defence, and it is long; but it should seem by his breaking off abruptly, just when he came to the main point (Act 7:50), that it would have been much longer if his enemies would have given him leave to say all he had to say. In general we may observe,

1.That in this discourse he appears to be a man ready and mighty in the scriptures, and thereby thoroughly furnished for every good word and work. He can relate scripture stories, and such as were very pertinent to his purpose, off-hand without looking in his Bible. He was filled with the Holy Ghost, not so much to reveal to him new things, or open to him the secret counsels and decrees of God concerning the Jewish nation, with them to convict these gainsayers; no, but to bring to his remembrance the scriptures of the Old Testament, and to teach him how to make use of them for their conviction. Those that are full of the Holy Ghost will be full of the scripture, as Stephen was.

2.That he quotes the scriptures according to the Septuagint translation, by which it appears he was one of the Hellenist Jews, who used that version in their synagogues. His following this, occasions divers variations from the Hebrew original in this discourse, which the judges of the court did not correct, because they knew how he was led into them; nor is it any derogation to the authority of that Spirit by which he spoke, for the variations are not material. We have a maxim, Apices juris non sunt jura - Mere points of law are not law itself. These verses carry on this his compendium of church history to the end of the book of Genesis. Observe,

(1.)His preface: Men, brethren, and fathers, hearken. He gives them, though not flattering titles, yet civil and respectful ones, signifying his expectation of fair treatment with them; from men he hopes to be treated with humanity, and he hopes that brethren and fathers will use him in a fatherly brotherly way. They are ready to look upon him as an apostate from the Jewish church, and an enemy to them. But, to make way for their conviction to the contrary, he addresses himself to them as men, brethren, and fathers, resolving to look on himself as one of them, though they would not so look on him. He craves their attention: Hearken; though he was about to tell them what they already knew, yet he begs them to hearken to it, because, though they knew it all, yet they would not without a very close application of mind know how to apply it to the case before them.

(2.)His entrance upon the discourse, which (whatever it may seem to those that read it carelessly) is far from being a long ramble only to amuse the hearers, and give them a diversion by telling them an old story. No; it is all pertinent and ad rem - to the purpose, to show them that God had no this heart so much upon that holy place and the law as they had; but, as he had a church in the world many ages before that holy place was founded and the ceremonial law given, so he would have when they should both have had their period.

[1.]He begins with the call of Abraham out of Ur of the Chaldees, by which he was set apart for God to be the trustee of the promise, and the father of the Old Testament church. This we had an account of (Gen 12:1, etc.), and it is referred to, Neh 9:7, Neh 9:8. His native country was an idolatrous country, it was Mesopotamia, (Act 7:2), the land of the Chaldeans (Act 7:4); thence God brought him at two removes, not too far at once, dealing tenderly with him; he first brought him out of the land of the Chaldeans to Charran, or Haran, a place midway between that and Canaan (Gen 11:31), and thence five years after, when his father was dead, he removed him into the land of Canaan, wherein you now dwell. It should seem, the first time that God spoke to Abraham, he appeared in some visible display of the divine presence, as the God of glory (Act 7:2), to settle a correspondence with him: and then afterwards he kept up that correspondence, and spoke to him from time to time as there was occasion, without repeating his visible appearances as the God of glory.

First, From this call of Abraham we may observe, 1. That in all our ways we must acknowledge God, and attend the directions of his providence, as of the pillar of cloud and fire. It is not said, Abraham removed, but, God removed him into this land wherein you now dwell, and he did but follow his Leader. 2. Those whom God takes into covenant with himself he distinguishes from the children of this world; they are effectually called out of the state, out of the land, of their nativity; they must sit loose to the world, and live above it and every thing in it, even that in it which is most dear to them, and must trust God to make it up to them in another and better country, that is, the heavenly, which he will show them. God's chosen must follow him with an implicit faith and obedience.

Secondly, But let us see what this is to Stephen's case. 1. They had charged him as a blasphemer of God, and an apostate from the church; therefore he shows that he is a son of Abraham, and values himself upon his being able to say, Our father Abraham, and that he is a faithful worshipper of the God of Abraham, whom therefore he here calls the God of glory. He also shows that he owns divine revelation, and that particularly by which the Jewish church was founded and incorporated. 2. They were proud of their being circumcised; and therefore he shows that Abraham was taken under God's guidance, and into communion with him, before he was circumcised, for that was not till Act 7:8. With this argument Paul proves that Abraham was justified by faith, because he was justified when he was in uncircumcision: and so here. 3. They had a mighty jealousy for this holy place, which may be meant of the whole land of Canaan; for it was called the holy land, Immanuel's land; and the destruction of the holy house inferred that of the holy land. "Now," says Stephen, "you need not be so proud of it; for," (1.) "You came originally out of Ur of the Chaldees, where your fathers served other gods (Jos 24:2), and you were not the first planters of this country. Look therefore unto the rock whence you were hewn, and the holy of the pit out of which you were digged;" that is, as it follows there, "look unto Abraham your father, for I called him alone (Isa 51:1, Isa 51:2) - think of the meanness of your beginnings, and how you are entirely indebted to divine grace, and then you will see boasting to be for ever excluded. It was God that raised up the righteous man from the east, and called him to his foot. Isa 41:2. But, if his seed degenerate, let them know that God can destroy this holy place, and raise up to himself another people, for he is not a debtor to them." (2.) "God appeared in his glory to Abraham a great way off in Mesopotamia, before he came near Canaan, nay, before he dwelt in Charran; so that you must not think God's visits are confined to this land; no; he that brought the seed of the church from a country so far east can, if he pleases, carry the fruit of it to another country as far west." (3.) "God made no haste to bring him into this land, but let him linger some years by the way, which shows that God has not his heart so much upon this land as you have yours, neither is his honour, nor the happiness of his people, bound up in it. It is therefore neither blasphemy nor treason to say, It shall be destroyed,"

[2.]The unsettled state of Abraham and his seed for many ages after he was called out of Ur of the Chaldees. God did indeed promise that he would give it to him for a possession, and to his seed after him, Act 7:5. But, First, As yet he had no child, nor any by Sarah for many years after. Secondly, He himself was but a stranger and a sojourner in that land, and God gave him no inheritance in it, no, not so much as to set his foot on; but there he was as in a strange country, where he was always upon the remove, and could call nothing his own. Thirdly, His posterity did not come to the possession of it for a long time: After four hundred years they shall come and serve me in this place, and not till then, Act 7:7. Nay, Fourthly, They must undergo a great deal of hardship and difficulty before they shall be put into the possession of that land: they shall be brought into bondage, and ill treated in a strange land: and this, not as the punishment of any particular sin, as their wandering in the wilderness was, for we never find any such account given of their bondage in Egypt; but so God had appointed, and it must be. And at the end of four hundred years, reckoning from the birth of Isaac, that nation to whom they shall be in bondage will I judge, saith God. Now this teaches us, 1. That known unto God are all his works beforehand. When Abraham had neither inheritance nor heir, yet he was told he should have both, the one a land of promise, and the other a child of promise; and therefore both had, and received, by faith. 2. That God's promises, though they are slow, are sure in the operation of them; they will be fulfilled in the season of them, though perhaps not so soon as we expect. 3. That though the people of God may be in distress and trouble for a time, yet God will at length both rescue them and reckon with those that do oppress them; for, verily there is a God that judgeth in the earth.

But let us see how this serves Stephen's purpose. 1. The Jewish nation, for the honour of which they were so jealous, was very inconsiderable in its beginnings; as their common father Abraham was fetched out of obscurity in Ur of the Chaldees, so their tribes, and the heads of them, were fetched out of servitude in Egypt, when they were the fewest of all people, Deu 7:7. And what need is there of so much ado, as if their ruin, when they bring it upon themselves by sin, must be the ruin of the world, and of all God's interests in it? No; he that brought them out of Egypt can bring them into it again, as he threatened (Deu 28:68), and yet be no loser, while he can out of stones raise up children unto Abraham. 2. The slow steps by which the promise made to Abraham advanced towards the performance, and the many seeming contradictions here taken notice of, plainly show that it had a spiritual meaning, and that the land principally intended to be conveyed and secured by it was the better country, that is, the heavenly; as the apostle shows from this very argument that the patriarchs sojourned in the land of promise, as in a strange country, thence inferring that they looked for a city that had foundations, Heb 11:9, Heb 11:10. It was therefore no blasphemy to say, Jesus shall destroy this place, when at the same time we say, "He shall lead us to the heavenly Canaan, and put us in possession of that, of which the earthly Canaan was but a type and figure."

[3.]The building up of the family of Abraham, with the entail of divine grace upon it, and the disposals of divine Providence concerning it, which take up the rest of the book of Genesis.

First, God engaged to be a God to Abraham and his seed; and, in token of this, appointed that he and his male seed should be circumcised, Gen 17:9, Gen 17:10. He gave him the covenant of circumcision, that is, the covenant of which circumcision was the seal; and accordingly, when Abraham had a son born, he circumcised him the eighth day (Act 7:8), by which he was both bound by the divine law and interested in the divine promise; for circumcision had reference to both, being a seal of the covenant both on God's part - I will be to thee a God all-sufficient, and on man's part - Walk before me, and be thou perfect. And then when effectual care was thus taken for the securing of Abraham's seed, to be a seed to serve the Lord, they began to multiply: Isaac begat Jacob, and Jacob the twelve patriarchs, or roots of the respective tribes.

Secondly, Joseph, the darling and blessing of his father's house, was abused by his brethren; they envied him because of his dreams, and sold him into Egypt. Thus early did the children of Israel begin to grudge those among them that were eminent and outshone others, of which their enmity to Christ, who, like Joseph, was a Nazarite among his brethren, was a great instance.

Thirdly, God owned Joseph in his troubles, and was with him (Gen 39:2, Gen 39:21), by the influence of his Spirit, both on his mind, giving him comfort, and on the minds of those he was concerned with, giving him favour in their eyes. And thus at length he delivered him out of his afflictions, and Pharaoh made him the second man in the kingdom, Psa 105:20-22. And thus he not only arrived at great preferment among the Egyptians, but became the shepherd and stone of Israel, Gen 49:24.

Fourthly, Jacob was compelled to go down into Egypt, by a famine which forced him out of Canaan, a dearth (which was a great affliction), to that degree that our fathers found no sustenance in Canaan, Act 7:11. That fruitful land was turned into barrenness. But, hearing that there was corn in Egypt (treasured up by the wisdom of his own son), he sent out our fathers first to fetch corn, Act 7:12. And the second time that they went, Joseph, who at first made himself strange to them, made himself known to them, and it was notified to Pharaoh that they were Joseph's kindred and had a dependence upon him (Act 7:13), whereupon, with Pharaoh's leave, Joseph sent for his father Jacob to him into Egypt, with all his kindred and family, to the number of seventy-five souls, to be subsisted there, Act 7:13. In Genesis they are said to be seventy souls, Gen 46:27. But the Septuagint there makes them seventy-five, and Stephen or Luke follows that version, as Luk 3:36, where Cainan is inserted, which is not in the Hebrew text, but in the Septuagint. Some, by excluding Joseph and his sons, who were in Egypt before (which reduces the number to sixty-four), and adding the sons of the eleven patriarch, make the number seventy-five.

Fifthly, Jacob and his sons died in Egypt (Act 7:15), but were carried over to be buried in Canaan, Act 7:16. A very considerable difficulty occurs here: it is said, They were carried over into Sychem, whereas Jacob was buried not in Sychem, but near Hebron, in the cave of Machpelah, where Abraham and Isaac were buried, Gen 50:13. Joseph's bones indeed were buried in Sychem (Jos 24:32), and it seems by this (though it is not mentioned in the story) that the bones of all the other patriarchs were carried with his, each of them giving the same commandment concerning them that he had done; and of them this must be understood, not of Jacob himself. But then the sepulchre in Sychem was bought by Jacob (Gen 33:19), and by this it is described, Jos 24:32. How then is it here said to be bought by Abraham? Dr. Whitby's solution of this is very sufficient. He supplies it thus: Jacob went down into Egypt and died, he and our fathers; and (our fathers) were carried over into Sychem; and he, that is, Jacob, was laid in the sepulchre that Abraham brought for a sum of money, Gen 23:16. (Or, they were laid there, that is, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.) And they, namely, the other patriarchs, were buried in the sepulchre bought of the sons of Emmor, the father of Sychem.

Let us now see what this is to Stephen's purpose. 1. He still reminds them of the mean beginning of the Jewish nation, as a check to their priding themselves in the glories of that nation; and that it was by a miracle of mercy that they were raised up out of nothing to what they were, from so small a number to be so great a nation; but, if they answer not the intention of their being so raised, they can expect no other than to be destroyed. The prophets frequently put them in mind of the bringing of them out of Egypt, as a aggravation of their contempt of the law of God, and here it is urged upon them as an aggravation of their contempt of the gospel of Christ. 2. He reminds them likewise of the wickedness of those that were the patriarchs of their tribes, in envying their brother Joseph, and selling him into Egypt; and the same spirit was still working in them towards Christ and his ministers. 3. Their holy land, which they doted so much upon, their fathers were long kept out of the possession of, and met with dearth and great affliction in it; and therefore let them not think it strange if, after it has been so long polluted with sin, it be at length destroyed. 4. The faith of the patriarchs in desiring to be buried in the land of Canaan plainly showed that they had an eye to the heavenly country, to which it was the design of this Jesus to lead them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–16. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 15
"Then came he out," it says, of the land of the Chaldeans: and that if one look closely into the matter, the Jews are of Persian origin: and that, without miracles, one must do as God bids, whatever hardships be the consequence; since the Patriarch left both the grave of his father and all that he had, in obedience to God's command. But if Abraham's father was not allowed to take part with him in the privilege of migrating to Palestine, because he was unworthy: much more shall the children be excluded at last, for all that they may have gone a good distance on the way.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 15
"Then came he out of the land of the Chaldaeans, and dwelt in Charran: and from thence, when his father was dead, He removed him into this land, wherein ye now dwell." See how he raises their thoughts away from their possession of the land. For if He said that He will give: clearly all came from Him, and nothing from themselves. For he came, having left both kindred and country. Wherefore then did He not give it to him? Truly it was a figure of another land.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Acts 7:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.