Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And he said unto him, Went not mine heart with thee, when the man turned again from his chariot to meet thee? Is it a time to receive money, and to receive garments, and oliveyards, and vineyards, and sheep, and oxen, and menservants, and maidservants?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And he said H559 unto him, Went H1980 not mine heart H3820 with thee, when the man H376 turned H2015 again from his chariot H4818 to meet H7125 thee? Is it a time H6256 to receive H3947 money H3701, and to receive H3947 garments H899, and oliveyards H2132, and vineyards H3754, and sheep H6629, and oxen H1241, and menservants H5650, and maidservants H8198?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Elisha said to him, "Wasn't my heart there with you when the man left his chariot to meet you? Is this a time to receive silver and clothing - and olive groves and vineyards and sheep and oxen and male and female slaves?
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But Elisha questioned him, “Did not my spirit go with you when the man got down from his chariot to meet you? Is this the time to accept money and clothing, olive groves and vineyards, sheep and oxen, menservants and maidservants?
Ask
American Standard Version
And he said unto him, Went not my heart with thee, when the man turned from his chariot to meet thee? Is it a time to receive money, and to receive garments, and oliveyards and vineyards, and sheep and oxen, and men-servants and maid-servants?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He said to him, “Didn’t my heart go with you, when the man turned from his chariot to meet you? Is it a time to receive money, and to receive garments, and olive groves and vineyards, and sheep and cattle, and male servants and female servants?
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But he saide vnto him, Went not mine heart with thee when the man turned againe from his charet to meete thee? Is this a time to take money, and to receiue garments, and oliues, and vineyardes, and sheepe, and oxen, and men seruants, and maide seruants?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And he saith unto him, `My heart went not when the man turned from off his chariot to meet thee; is it a time to take silver, and to take garments, and olives, and vines, and flock, and herd, and men-servants, and maid-servants?
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Second Kings 5:26 presents the dramatic and divinely insightful confrontation between the prophet Elisha and his servant Gehazi. This verse unveils Elisha's supernatural discernment of Gehazi's deceitful and covetous act of secretly pursuing and accepting gifts from Naaman, the Syrian commander, gifts that Elisha himself had steadfastly refused. Through a series of penetrating rhetorical questions, Elisha exposes Gehazi's profound spiritual misjudgment, highlighting the utter inappropriateness of seeking material gain in a moment when God's free and sovereign grace had been so powerfully demonstrated. The verse thus serves as a stark indictment of greed and a powerful affirmation of divine omniscience, setting the stage for the severe consequences that follow.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This pivotal verse forms the climax of the narrative in 2 Kings 5, immediately following the miraculous healing of Naaman, the Syrian commander. Naaman, afflicted with leprosy, sought Elisha's help and was instructed to wash seven times in the Jordan River. Despite initial resistance, Naaman obeyed and was completely cleansed. In overwhelming gratitude, he returned to Elisha, offering lavish gifts, which Elisha resolutely refused, emphasizing that God's healing power is not for sale (2 Kings 5:16). However, Gehazi, Elisha's servant, driven by avarice, secretly pursued Naaman, fabricating a story about Elisha needing silver and garments for two young prophets. Naaman, still grateful, readily gave Gehazi double what he requested. Gehazi then hid these ill-gotten gains. Upon Gehazi's return, Elisha's question in 2 Kings 5:26 is not a query for information but a divinely informed accusation, revealing Elisha's supernatural awareness of Gehazi's every action. This confrontation directly precedes the pronouncement of judgment in 2 Kings 5:27, where Gehazi is struck with Naaman's leprosy.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient Near East, the offering of gifts to a healer, prophet, or powerful dignitary was a common practice, serving as a token of respect, gratitude, or a means to secure favor. Naaman's generous gifts were entirely consistent with this cultural norm, reflecting the immense value placed on healing, especially from a socially debilitating disease like leprosy. Elisha's steadfast refusal of these gifts, however, was a deliberate counter-cultural act, designed to underscore the unique nature of Yahweh, the God of Israel, whose power and blessings could not be commodified or influenced by human wealth. Prophets in Israel were generally expected to live simply, relying on divine provision, and their integrity was paramount to their ministry. Gehazi's actions directly violated this prophetic ethos, seeking personal enrichment through deceit and undermining the purity of God's work. The extensive list of possessions—money, garments, oliveyards, vineyards, sheep, oxen, menservants, and maidservants—represents the full spectrum of wealth and status in an agrarian society, highlighting the comprehensive nature of Gehazi's covetous desires.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of 2 Kings and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it emphatically demonstrates Divine Discernment and Omniscience, showcasing God's ability to penetrate the deepest secrets of the human heart and expose hidden deeds. Elisha's prophetic insight, expressed as "Went not mine heart [with thee]?", is a direct manifestation of this divine attribute, echoing the truth that "the eyes of the LORD are in every place, keeping watch on the evil and the good" (Proverbs 15:3). Secondly, the passage serves as a severe warning against The Dangers of Greed and Covetousness, illustrating how the pursuit of material gain can corrupt even those in close proximity to sacred service, leading to deceit and spiritual ruin. This aligns with biblical warnings that "the love of money is the root of all evil" (1 Timothy 6:10). Thirdly, it underscores the critical importance of Integrity in Ministry and Service. Elisha's refusal of gifts was essential to preserve the purity of God's name and the prophetic office, ensuring that all glory redounded to God alone. Gehazi's actions fundamentally compromised this integrity, suggesting that divine blessings could be exploited for personal profit. Finally, Elisha's rhetorical question, "Is it a time to receive money...?", highlights the theme of Appropriate Timing and Spiritual Priorities, challenging believers to discern what is truly fitting and honoring to God in every circumstance, especially when God's miraculous power and grace are on display.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Heart (Hebrew, lêb', H3820): In Hebrew anthropology, the "heart" (lêb) is far more than an organ of emotion; it is the comprehensive center of one's intellect, will, conscience, and spiritual being. When Elisha asks, "Went not mine heart [with thee]?", it signifies a profound spiritual and prophetic awareness, a divine insight that allowed Elisha to perceive Gehazi's actions and intentions as if he were physically present. This is not mere intuition but a supernatural revelation from God, granting Elisha full knowledge of Gehazi's secret pursuit and deception. It underscores God's omniscience and His ability to reveal hidden things to His servants.
  • Time (Hebrew, 'êth', H6256): This word refers to a specific, appointed, or opportune moment, a season or a proper occasion. Elisha's rhetorical question, "Is it a time to receive money...?", is loaded with spiritual significance. It implies that the unique circumstances—the recent miraculous healing of a Gentile commander, demonstrating the free and sovereign power of Yahweh—made Gehazi's pursuit of personal wealth utterly inappropriate, spiritually perverse, and deeply dishonoring to God. It was a "time" for God's glory to be magnified through selfless service, not for human greed to surface and defile the sacred.
  • Receive (Hebrew, lâqach', H3947): This primitive root verb means "to take," "to get," "to acquire," or "to accept." In the context of Elisha's question, it highlights Gehazi's active, deliberate, and covetous decision to acquire the forbidden wealth. It stands in stark contrast to Elisha's intentional and public refusal to "receive" anything from Naaman. Gehazi's act of "receiving" represents a direct disobedience to his master's example and a profound betrayal of the spiritual principles that Elisha embodied, directly undermining the message of God's unmerited grace.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And he said unto him, Went not mine heart [with thee],": This opening clause immediately establishes the confrontational nature of the exchange and reveals Elisha's supernatural knowledge. The rhetorical question, as discussed in the Key Word Analysis, signifies that Elisha, through divine revelation, was fully aware of Gehazi's actions and intentions, despite not being physically present. It is a powerful declaration of prophetic insight, demonstrating God's omniscience and His intimate knowledge of human hearts and deeds.
  • "when the man turned again from his chariot to meet thee?": This clause precisely pinpoints the moment of Gehazi's deception, leaving no room for denial. Elisha's detailed knowledge of this specific event—Naaman turning back to meet Gehazi, a detail only Gehazi and Naaman would have known—underscores the fact that Gehazi's pursuit was deliberate, calculated, and involved a direct, clandestine interaction with Naaman after Elisha had dismissed him. It confirms the divine source of Elisha's information.
  • "[Is it] a time to receive money, and to receive garments, and oliveyards, and vineyards, and sheep, and oxen, and menservants, and maidservants?": This is the core of Elisha's searing rebuke, a powerful rhetorical question that highlights the profound spiritual incongruity and moral depravity of Gehazi's actions. The lengthy and comprehensive list of material possessions emphasizes the breadth and depth of Gehazi's covetousness, encompassing not just immediate wealth (money, garments) but also long-term assets (land, livestock) and human labor (servants). Elisha's question challenges Gehazi's priorities, pointing out that in a moment when God's free grace was powerfully demonstrated, it was utterly inappropriate and spiritually defiling to pursue personal gain, thereby dishonoring God and His sacred work.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several potent Literary Devices to convey its powerful message. The most prominent is the Rhetorical Question, used twice: "Went not mine heart [with thee]?" and "Is it a time to receive money...?" These questions are not posed to elicit information but to make a forceful statement, emphasizing Elisha's divine knowledge and the utter spiritual inappropriateness of Gehazi's actions. The use of a List or Catalog of possessions ("money, and garments, and oliveyards, and vineyards, and sheep, and oxen, and menservants, and maidservants") serves to underscore the comprehensive nature of Gehazi's greed, painting a vivid picture of the worldly wealth he coveted. There is also a strong sense of Juxtaposition between Elisha's selfless, grace-oriented ministry and Gehazi's self-serving, materialistic pursuit. This stark contrast highlights the moral and spiritual failings of the servant in opposition to the prophet's integrity. Finally, Irony is powerfully present: Gehazi, who served a prophet demonstrating God's free and unmerited power, sought to profit from that very power, ultimately bringing a severe and fitting judgment upon himself.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This pivotal verse resonates with profound theological truths that extend far beyond the immediate narrative. It powerfully asserts God's absolute omniscience and omnipresence, reminding us that no action, thought, or intention is hidden from His sight. Elisha's prophetic insight, granted by the Spirit, serves as a tangible demonstration of this divine attribute, reinforcing the biblical principle that God sees and knows all. Furthermore, the passage serves as a stark warning against the insidious nature of greed and materialism, illustrating how the pursuit of worldly gain can corrupt spiritual integrity and lead to severe consequences. It underscores the vital importance of maintaining pure motives in service to God, ensuring that His glory, not personal profit, remains the ultimate aim. The "time" element in Elisha's question also highlights the concept of spiritual discernment—understanding what is fitting and honoring to God in every season and circumstance, especially when God is working powerfully and demonstrating His grace.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The story of Gehazi and Elisha's piercing question serves as a timeless mirror for our own hearts and priorities. It calls us to a radical self-examination, reminding us that God's all-seeing eye penetrates beyond outward appearances to the deepest recesses of our motives and desires. In a world constantly clamoring for more, Gehazi's covetousness stands as a stark warning: the pursuit of material gain, especially when it compromises integrity or dishonors God's name, carries profound spiritual costs. This narrative challenges us to live with absolute transparency before God, knowing that nothing is hidden from Him. It compels us to guard our hearts against the allure of wealth, status, or personal advantage, particularly when engaged in spiritual service. Instead, we are called to cultivate a spirit of contentment and generosity, prioritizing God's glory and the advancement of His kingdom above all earthly possessions. Our lives should reflect the free grace of God, not a transactional spirituality that seeks to profit from divine blessings.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life might I be tempted to pursue personal gain at the expense of spiritual integrity or God's glory?
  • How does Elisha's prophetic insight challenge my understanding of God's omniscience and my own accountability in secret thoughts and actions?
  • Am I discerning the "time" correctly in my life, ensuring my actions and pursuits align with God's purposes rather than worldly values, especially when God is moving powerfully?
  • What steps can I take to cultivate a heart that prioritizes spiritual wealth and God's free grace over material accumulation and worldly ambition?

FAQ

How did Elisha know what Gehazi had done, even though he wasn't physically present?

Answer: Elisha's knowledge was not based on mere suspicion or human observation but on divine revelation. The phrase "Went not mine heart [with thee]" signifies a supernatural, prophetic insight granted by God. As a prophet of the Lord, Elisha was empowered by the Holy Spirit to discern Gehazi's actions and intentions, even when physically separated. This demonstrates God's omniscience, revealing that nothing is hidden from Him, and He can reveal secrets to His chosen servants, as seen in other prophetic accounts (e.g., 1 Samuel 9:19 where Samuel knew Saul's thoughts before he spoke).

Why was it "not a time" for Gehazi to receive money and gifts?

Answer: It was "not a time" because Gehazi's actions directly contradicted the profound spiritual lesson Elisha had just demonstrated. Elisha had refused Naaman's generous gifts to make it unequivocally clear that God's healing and salvation are freely given by grace, not earned or purchased. Gehazi's secret pursuit of these gifts undermined this divine truth, suggesting that God's power could be exploited for personal profit. It disgraced the name of Yahweh and the integrity of the prophetic office, turning a demonstration of divine grace into an opportunity for worldly gain. Such an act was profoundly out of alignment with God's purposes in that moment, which was to magnify His free and sovereign power.

What was the consequence for Gehazi's actions?

Answer: The consequence for Gehazi's greed and deceit was severe and immediate. Following Elisha's confrontation, Gehazi was struck with the very leprosy that Naaman had been healed of. 2 Kings 5:27 states, "The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee, and unto thy seed for ever. And he went out from his presence a leper as white as snow." This served as a powerful and visible judgment, demonstrating the gravity of his sin and the purity God demands from those who serve Him, reinforcing the principle that God cannot be mocked.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The narrative of Gehazi's covetousness and Elisha's prophetic discernment finds its ultimate fulfillment and profound contrast in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While Gehazi sought earthly gain, betraying his master and defiling the message of free grace, Jesus, the true Prophet and perfect Servant, utterly rejected all worldly allurements. When tempted by Satan to gain all the kingdoms of the world through compromise, Jesus steadfastly refused, declaring that worship is due to God alone (Matthew 4:8-10). His entire ministry was characterized by self-emptying love and radical generosity, culminating in His ultimate sacrifice on the cross. He came not to be served or to accumulate wealth, but to serve and to give His life as a ransom for many (Mark 10:45). Unlike Gehazi, who sought to "receive" material possessions, Christ, "though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich" (2 Corinthians 8:9). The salvation He offers is truly free, a gift of living water that cannot be bought (John 4:10), received by grace through faith, not by works or payment (Ephesians 2:8-9). Gehazi's failure underscores the necessity of Christ's perfect integrity and His selfless provision, which alone can cleanse the leprosy of sin and offer true, eternal riches that do not fade away.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Kings 5 verses 20–27

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Naaman, a Syrian, a courtier, a soldier, had many servants, and we read how wise and good they were, Kg2 5:13. Elisha, a holy prophet, a man of God, has but one servant, and he proves a base, lying, naughty fellow. Those that heard of Elisha at a distance honoured him, and got good by what they heard; but he that stood continually before him, to hear his wisdom, had no good impressions made upon him either by his doctrine or miracles. One would have expected that Elisha's servant should be a saint (even Ahab's servant, Obadiah, was), but even Christ himself had a Judas among his followers. The means of grace cannot give grace. The best men, the best ministers have often had those about them that have been their grief and shame. The nearer the church the further from God. Many come from the east and west to sit down with Abraham when the children of the kingdom shall be cast out. Here is,

I. Gehazi's sin. It was a complicated sin. 1. The love of money, that root of all evil, was at the bottom of it. His master contemned Naaman's treasures, but he coveted them, Kg2 5:20. His heart (says bishop Hall) was packed up in Naaman's chests, and he must run after him to fetch it. Multitudes, by coveting worldly wealth, have erred from the faith and pierced themselves with many sorrows. 2. He blamed his master for refusing Naaman's present, condemned him as foolish in not taking gold when he might have it, envied and grudged his kindness and generosity to this stranger, though it was for the good of his soul. In short, he thought himself wiser than his master. 3. When Naaman, like a person of accomplished manners, alighted from his chariot to meet him (Kg2 5:21), he told him a deliberate lie, that his master sent him to him, and so he received that courtesy to himself that Naaman intended to his master. 4. He abused his master, and basely misrepresented him to Naaman as one that had soon repented of his generosity, that was fickle, and did not know his own mind, that would say and unsay, swear and unswear, that would not do an honourable thing but he must presently undo it again. his story of the two sons of the prophets was as silly as it was false; if he would have begged a token for two young scholars, surely less than a talent of silver might serve them. 5. There was danger of his alienating Naaman from that holy religion which he had espoused, and lessening his good opinion of it. he would be ready to say, as Paul's enemies suggested concerning him (Co2 12:16, Co2 12:17), that, though Elisha himself did not burden him, yet being crafty he caught him with guile, sending those that made a gain of him. We hope that he understood afterwards that Elisha's hand was not in it, and that Gehazi was forced to restore what he had unjustly got, else it might have driven him to his idols again. 6. His seeking to conceal what he had unjustly got added much to his sin. (1.) He hid it, as Achan did his gain, by sacrilege, in the tower, a secret place, a strong place, till he should have an opportunity of laying it out, Kg2 5:24. Now he thought himself sure of it, and applauded his own management of a fraud by which he had imposed, not only upon the prudence of Naaman, but upon Elisha's spirit of discerning, as Ananias and Sapphira upon the apostles. (2.) He denied it: He went in, and stood before his master, ready to receive his orders. None looked more observant of his master, though really none more injurious to him; he thought, as Ephraim, I have become rich, but they shall find no iniquity in me, Hos 12:8. His master asked him where he had been, "Nowhere, sir" (said he), "out of the house." Note, One lie commonly begets another: the way of that sin is down-hill; therefore dare to be true.

II. The punishment of this sin. Elisha immediately called him to an account for it; and observe,

1.How he was convicted. he thought to impose upon the prophet, but was soon given to understand that the Spirit of prophecy could not be deceived, and that it was in vain to lie to the Holy Ghost. Elisha could tell him, (1.) What he had done, though he had denied it. "Thou sayest thou wentest nowhere, but went not my heart with thee?" Kg2 5:26. Had Gehazi yet to learn that prophets had spiritual eyes? or could he think to hide any thing from a seer, from him with whom the secret of the Lord was? Note, It is folly to presume upon sin in hopes of secresy. When thou goest aside into any by-path does not thy own conscience go with thee? Does not the eye of God go with thee? He that covers his sin shall not prosper, particularly a lying tongue is but for a moment, Pro 12:19. Truth will transpire, and often comes to light strangely, to the confusion of those that make lies their refuge. (2.) What he designed, though he kept that in his own breast. He could tell him the very thoughts and intents of his heart, that he was projecting, now that he had got these two talents, to purchase ground and cattle, to leave Elisha's service, and to set up for himself. Note, All the foolish hopes and contrivances of carnal worldlings are open before God. And he tells him also the evil of it: "Is it a time to receive money? Is this an opportunity of enriching thyself? Couldst thou find no better way of getting money than by belying thy master and laying a stumbling-block before a young convert?" Note, Those that are for getting wealth at any time, and by any ways and means whatsoever, right or wrong, lay themselves open to a great deal of temptation. Those that will be rich (per fas, per nefas; rem, rem, quocunque modo rem - by fair means, by foul means; careless of principle, intent only on money) drown themselves in destruction and perdition, Ti1 6:9. War, and fire, and plague, and shipwreck, are not, as many make them, things to get money by. It is not a time to increase our wealth when we cannot do it but in such ways as are dishonourable to God and religion or injurious to our brethren or the public.

2.How he was punished for it: The leprosy of Naaman shall cleave to thee, Kg2 5:27. If he will have his money, he shall take his disease with it, Transit cum onere - It passes with this incumbrance. He was contriving to entail lands upon his posterity; but, instead of them, he entails a loathsome disease on the heirs of his body, from generation to generation. The sentence was immediately executed on himself; no sooner said than done: He went out from his presence a leper as white as snow. Thus he is stigmatized and made infamous, and carries the mark of his shame wherever he goes: thus he loads himself and family with a curse, which shall not only for the present proclaim his villany, but for ever perpetuate the remembrance of it. Note, The getting of treasures by a lying tongue is a vanity tossed to and fro of those that seek death, Pro 21:6. Those who get wealth by fraud and injustice cannot expect either the comfort or the continuance of it. What was Gehazi profited, though he gained his two talents, when thereby he lost his health, his honour, his peace, his service, and, if repentance prevented not, his soul for ever? See Job 20:12, etc.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 20–27. Public domain.
Copy as
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
ON THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS 5:27
After Gehazi had come back from his meeting with Naaman, he entered Elisha’s house, and [the prophet] asked him, according to custom, why he had moved away from him. “Where do you come from?” he said to Gehazi. He said this on purpose, so that the justice of the judgment passed on his sin might be evident. If Gehazi repented and swore, he would have been forgiven; but if he denied that he had secretly received money, the leprosy of Naaman would cover him conspicuously.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Kings 5:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.