TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 2 Kings 3:6–19. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Jehoram has no sooner got the sceptre into his hand than he takes the sword into his hand, to reduce Moab. Crowns bring great cares and perils to the heads that wear them; no sooner in honour than in war. Now here we have,
I.The concerting of this expedition between Jehoram king of Israel and Jehoshaphat king of Judah.
Jehoram levied an army (Kg2 3:6), and such an opinion he had of the godly king of Judah that,
1.He courted him to be his confederate: Wilt thou go with me against Moab? And he gained him. Jehoshaphat said, I will go up. I am as thou art, Kg2 3:7. Judah and Israel, though unhappily divided from each other, yet can unite against Moab a common enemy. Jehoshaphat upbraids them not with their revolt from the house of David, nor makes it an article of their alliance that they shall return to their allegiance, though he had good reason to insist upon it, but treats with Israel as a sister-kingdom. Those are no friends to their own peace and strength who can never find in their hearts to forgive and forget an old injury, and unite with those that have formerly broken in upon their rights. Quod initio non vulvit, tractu temporis invalescit - That which was originally destitute of authority in the progress of time acquires it.
2.He consulted him as his confidant, Kg2 3:8. He took advice of Jehoshaphat, who had more wisdom and experience than himself, which way they should make their descent upon the country of Moab; and he advised that they should not march against them the nearest way, over Jordan, but go round through the wilderness of Edom, that they might take the king of Edom (who was tributary to him) and his forces along with them If two be better than one, much more will not a three-fold cord be easily broken. Jehoshaphat had like to have paid dearly for joining with Ahab, yet he joined with his son, and this expedition also had like to have been fatal to him. There is nothing got by being yoked with unbelievers.
II.The great straits that the army of the confederates was reduced to in this expedition.
Before they saw the face of an enemy they were all in danger of perishing for want of water, Kg2 3:9. This ought to have been considered before they ventured a march through the wilderness, the same wilderness (or very near it) where their ancestors wanted water, Num 20:2. God suffers his people, by their own improvidence, to bring themselves into distress, that the wisdom, power, and goodness of his providence may be glorified in their relief. What is more cheap and common than water? It is drink to every beast of the field, Psa 104:11. Yet the want of it will soon humble and ruin kings and armies. The king of Israel sadly lamented the present distress, and the imminent danger it put them in of falling into the hands of their enemies the Moabites, to whom, when weakened by thirst, they would be an easy prey, Kg2 3:10. it was he that had called these kings together; yet he charges it upon Providence, and reflects upon that as unkind: The Lord has called them together. Thus the foolishness of man perverteth his way, and then his heart fretteth against the Lord, Pro 19:3.
III.Jehoshaphat's good motion to ask counsel of God in this exigency, Kg2 3:11.
The place they were now in could not but remind them of the wonders of which their fathers told them, the waters fetched out of the rock for Israel's seasonable supply. The thought of this, we may suppose, encouraged Jehoshaphat to ask, Is there not here a prophet of the Lord, like unto Moses? He was the more concerned because it was by his advice that they fetched this compass through the wilderness, Kg2 3:8. It was well that Jehoshaphat enquired of the Lord now, but it would have been much better if he had done it sooner, before he engaged in this war, or steered this course; so the distress might have been prevented. Good men are sometimes remiss and forgetful, and neglect their duty till necessity and affliction drive them to it.
IV.Elisha recommended as a proper person for them to consult with Kg2 3:11. And here we may wonder,
1.That Elisha should follow the camp, especially in such a tedious march as this, as a volunteer, unasked, unobserved, and in no post of honour at all; not in the office of priest of the war (Deu 20:2) or president of the council of war, but in such obscurity that none of the kings knew they had such a jewel in the treasures of their camp, nor so good a friend in their retinue. We may suppose it was by special direction from heaven that Elisha attended the war, as the chariot of Israel and the horsemen thereof. Thus does God anticipate his people with the blessings of his goodness and provide his oracles for those that provide them not for themselves. It would often be bad with us if God did not take more care of us, both for soul and body, than we take for ourselves.
2.That a servant of the king of Israel knew of his being there when the king himself did not. Probably it was such a servant as Obadiah was to his father Ahab, one that feared the Lord; to such a one Elisha made himself known, not to the kings. The account he gives of him is that it was he that poured water on the hands of Elijah, that is, he was his servant, and particularly attended him when he washed his hands. He that will be great, let him learn to minister: he that will rise high, let him begin low.
V.The application which the kings made to Elisha.
They went down to him to his quarters, Kg2 3:12. Jehoshaphat had such an esteem for a prophet with whom the word of the Lord was that he would condescend to visit him in his own person and not send for him up to him. The other two were moved by the straits they were in to make their court to the prophet. He that humbled himself was thus exalted, and looked great, when three kings came to knock at his door, and beg his assistance; see Rev 3:9.
VI.The entertainment which Elisha gave them.
1.He was very plain with the wicked king of Israel (Kg2 3:13): "What have I to do with thee? How canst thou expect an answer of peace from me? Get thee to the prophets of thy father and mother, whom thou hast countenanced and maintained in thy prosperity, and let them help thee now in thy distress." Elisha was not imposed upon, as Jehoshaphat was, by his partial and hypocritical reformation; he knew that, though he had put away the image of Baal, Baal's prophets were still dear to him, and perhaps some of the were now in his camp. "Go," said he, "go to them. Get you to the gods whom you have served, Jdg 10:14. The world and the flesh have ruled you, let them help you; why should God be enquired of by you?" Eze 14:3. Elisha tells him to his face, in a holy indignation at his wickedness, that he can scarcely find in his heart to look towards him or to see him, Kg2 3:14. Jehoram is to be respected as a prince, but as a wicked man he is a vile person, and is to be condemned, Psa 15:4. Elisha, as a subject, will honour him, but as a prophet he will cause him to know his iniquity. For those that had such an extraordinary commission it was fit (though not for a common person) to say to a king, Thou art wicked, Job 34:18. Jehoram has so much self-command as to take this plain dealing patiently; he cares not now for hearing of the prophets of Baal, but is a humble suitor to the God of Israel and his prophet, representing the present case as very deplorable and humbly recommending it to the prophet's compassionate consideration. In effect, he owns himself unworthy, but let not the other kings be ruined for his sake.
2.Elisha showed a great respect to the godly king of Judah, regarded his presence, and, for his sake, would enquire of the Lord for them all. It is good being with those that have God's favour and his prophet's love. Wicked people often fare the better for the friendship and society of those that are godly.
3.He composed himself to receive instructions from God. His mind was somewhat ruffled and disturbed at the sight of Jehoram; though he was not put into a sinful heat or passion, nor had spoken unadvisedly, yet his zeal for the present indisposed him for prayer and the operations of the Spirit, which required a mind very calm and sedate. He therefore called for a musician (Kg2 3:15), a devout musician, one accustomed to play upon his harp and sign psalms to it. To hear God's praises sweetly sung, as David had appointed, would cheer his spirits, and settle his mind, and help to put him into a right frame both to speak to him and to hear from him. We find a company of prophets prophesying with a psaltery and a tabret before them, Sa1 10:5. Those that desire communion with God must keep their spirits quiet and serene. Elisha being refreshed, and having the tumult of his spirits laid by this divine music, the hand of the Lord came upon him, and his visit did him more honour than that of three kings.
4.God, by him, gave them assurance that the issue of the present distress would be comfortable and glorious.
(1.)They should speedily be supplied with water, Kg2 3:16, Kg2 3:17. To try their faith and obedience, he bids them make the valley full of ditches to receive the water. Those that expect God's blessings must prepare room for them, dig the pools for the rain to fill, as they did in the valley of Baca, and so made even that a well, Psa 84:6. To raise the wonder, he tells them they shall have water enough, and yet there shall be neither wind nor rain. Elijah, by prayer, obtained water out of the clouds, but Elisha fetches it nobody knows whence. The spring of these waters shall be as secret as the head of the Nile. God is not tied to second causes. Ordinarily it is by a plentiful rain that God confirms his inheritance (Psa 68:9), but here it is done without rain, at least without rain in that place. Some of the fountains of the great deep, it is likely, were broken up on this occasion; and, to increase the miracle, that valley only (as it should seem) was filled with water, and no other place had any share of it.
(2.)That supply should be an earnest of victory (Kg2 3:18): "This is but a light thing in the sight of the Lord; you shall not only be saved from perishing, but shall return in triumph." As God gives freely to the unworthy, so he gives richly, like himself, more than we are able to ask or think. His grants out-do our requests and expectations. Those that sincerely seek for the dew of God's grace shall have it, and by it be made more than conquerors. It is promised that they shall be masters of the rebellious country, and they are permitted to lay it waste and ruin it, Kg2 3:19. The law forbade them to fell fruit-trees to be employed in their sieges (Deu 20:19), but not when it was intended, in justice, for the starving of a country that had forfeited its fruits, by denying tribute to those to whom tribute was due.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
After the death of Ahab, his son Ahaziah died too, and since he had no children, his brother Jehoram took his place. Therefore the Scripture reports that he moved with his army against the king of Moab. He went to war because Mesha, king of Moab, had refused to pay his tribute to the kings of Israel and had not paid both Hezekiah and Jehoram, that is, [he had not paid] one hundred thousand fat lambs and one hundred thousand unshorn rams. The word noqdo, which the Scripture mentions here, derives from Hebrew and can be translated as “king of the shepherds of rams,” that is, he reared huge herds of them. So Jehoram, who had resolved to assert the rights that his brother had renounced, summoned the kings of the inhabitants of Judea and Edom and marched with them through the territories of the children of Moab. But they found themselves on a barren and arid land, and they had no water for the army. The three kings went to see Elisha, following the advice of righteous Jehoshaphat, and implored him to rescue the suffering people, who were overwhelmed with thirst. The prophet protested and harshly reproached Jehoram but was pleased with Jehoshaphat and gave him hope of salvation. At the same time, he promised that through his mediation, he and his companions would soon obtain the victory through the agency of the Lord.
Continue studying 2 Kings 3:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
2 Kings 3:9 vividly portrays a critical juncture in the joint military campaign of the kings of Israel, Judah, and Edom against the rebellious Moabites. Having embarked on a strategically chosen, but arduous, seven-day circuitous march through a wilderness region, the combined allied forces, along with their indispensable livestock, find themselves in a dire and life-threatening predicament: a complete and utter lack of water. This severe logistical and existential crisis immediately highlights the inherent limitations of human foresight and military might, setting the stage for an essential divine intervention that will ultimately determine the fate of the entire expedition.
Context
Literary Context
This pivotal verse is strategically placed early in the narrative of 2 Kings chapter 3, immediately following the account of Moab's rebellion against Israel after the death of King Ahab, as detailed in 2 Kings 3:4-5. The kings of Israel (Jehoram), Judah (Jehoshaphat), and Edom have forged a formidable alliance to suppress this uprising. Verse 9 marks a dramatic and critical turning point in their campaign, abruptly shifting the narrative's focus from human military strategy and combined might to an unforeseen and overwhelming environmental crisis that demands divine aid. It serves as the immediate and desperate prelude to the kings' urgent search for a prophet of the Lord, specifically Elisha, to inquire of God regarding their dire situation, a plea that materializes in 2 Kings 3:11. The preceding verses meticulously establish the complex geopolitical backdrop and the military objective, while this verse powerfully introduces the immediate, life-threatening challenge that will drive the subsequent narrative and underscore the necessity of God's intervention.
Historical & Cultural Context
In the ancient Near East, particularly within the arid and semi-arid regions of the Levant, water was an absolutely indispensable and often scarce resource, making its availability paramount for any large-scale movement, especially military campaigns. Armies of this era relied heavily on natural springs, established wells, and accessible rivers to sustain both their numerous soldiers and their accompanying animals. The "seven days' journey" through the wilderness, likely the desolate terrain of Edom, underscores a deliberate strategic decision. This circuitous route was probably chosen either to outflank Moabite defenses by approaching from an unexpected direction (the south) or to avoid direct confrontation on more predictable and fortified routes. Edom itself was a semi-independent kingdom, often existing as a vassal state to either Judah or Israel, and its wilderness was notoriously known for its harsh, unforgiving, and waterless terrain. The formation of this tripartite alliance between the kings reflects the intricate geopolitical landscape of the 9th century BCE, where regional powers frequently formed coalitions to maintain control over rebellious territories and ensure the flow of tribute payments. The water crisis described in this verse was far more than a mere inconvenience; it represented an existential threat, as a prolonged lack of water would rapidly debilitate an army, leading to widespread death, disease, and an inevitable, humiliating defeat.
Key Themes
2 Kings 3:9 contributes profoundly to several overarching theological and narrative themes woven throughout the book of Kings and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates the Limits of Human Power and Planning. Despite the combined military might, strategic foresight, and extensive resources of three allied kings, their elaborate plans and formidable forces are rendered utterly futile by a basic environmental necessity—water. This crisis underscores the overarching theme of Divine Sovereignty, demonstrating unequivocally that even the most formidable human endeavors and meticulously crafted strategies are ultimately subject to God's ultimate control over all circumstances. Secondly, the verse highlights the Necessity of Divine Intervention and the crucial Role of the Prophet as God's messenger. The dire and seemingly insurmountable situation forces the kings to acknowledge their utter dependence on a higher power, compelling them to seek the Lord's guidance through the prophet Elisha. This sets the stage for God to display His miraculous power through His chosen messenger, thereby reinforcing the consistent biblical message that true victory, provision, and deliverance come not from human strength, wisdom, or resources, but from God alone. This profound truth resonates with other biblical passages, such as Psalm 20:7 which declares, "Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the Lord our God," and Proverbs 21:31, which states, "The horse is made ready for the day of battle, but the victory belongs to the Lord."
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This Hebrew verb (H3212) signifies "to walk" or "to go," often implying a journey or movement. In this context, it emphasizes the deliberate action of the kings and their armies embarking on this military expedition. The choice of this verb highlights the intentionality of their movement, setting the stage for the consequences of their chosen path.
The King James Version's "fetched a compass" translates the Hebrew verb סָבַב (H5437), meaning "to revolve," "to surround," or "to make a circuit." This indicates that the allied forces intentionally took a roundabout or indirect route, rather than a direct one. This strategic maneuver was likely intended to gain a tactical advantage, such as surprising the Moabites or avoiding fortified areas. The irony lies in this calculated strategic detour leading them into an unforeseen and life-threatening water shortage.
The Hebrew word מַחֲנֶה (H4264) refers to an "encampment" or, by extension, an "army" or "company." Its inclusion here emphasizes the large scale of the military force involved—not just a small detachment, but the combined fighting power of three allied kingdoms. The well-being of this vast "host" was paramount to the success of the campaign, making the water shortage a direct, immediate, and comprehensive threat to the lives of thousands of soldiers and the entire military operation.
The term בְּהֵמָה (H929) specifically denotes "dumb beasts" or "large quadrupeds," referring to domesticated animals or livestock. In ancient warfare, animals such as donkeys, camels, and other beasts of burden were absolutely indispensable for transport, carrying vital supplies, equipment, and provisions for the army. Their lack of water was as critically debilitating as the soldiers' own, as dehydrated animals would quickly become incapacitated, crippling the army's mobility, logistics, and overall operational capacity. Their suffering underscores the pervasive and total nature of the crisis facing the expedition.
Verse Breakdown
"So the king of Israel went, and the king of Judah, and the king of Edom:"
This opening clause establishes the unified and decisive action of the three allied monarchs: Jehoram of Israel, Jehoshaphat of Judah, and the unnamed king of Edom. Their combined presence signifies a formidable military and political alliance, underscoring the gravity of the Moabite rebellion and the significant resources committed to its suppression. The personal involvement of these kings highlights the high stakes of the campaign.
"and they fetched a compass of seven days' journey:"
This phrase details the specific strategic decision made by the allied forces. They chose a circuitous or indirect route, which required seven days to traverse. This detour was likely a calculated military maneuver, possibly intended to surprise the Moabites by approaching from an unexpected direction (the south, through the wilderness of Edom) or to bypass heavily fortified Moabite strongholds. The "seven days" indicates a significant, pre-planned duration for this particular leg of their expedition, emphasizing the deliberate nature of their strategic choice.
"and there was no water for the host, and for the cattle that followed them."
This final, stark clause reveals the catastrophic and unforeseen consequence of their chosen route. Despite their extensive planning and strategic foresight, the allied forces encountered a severe and life-threatening water shortage. The crisis affected both the human soldiers ("the host") and their essential livestock ("the cattle"), indicating a complete logistical failure that jeopardized the entire expedition. This dire lack of water immediately renders their military might and strategic advantage moot, placing them in a position of extreme vulnerability, desperation, and existential threat.
Literary Devices
The verse effectively employs several powerful literary devices to heighten its impact. Most notably, Foreshadowing is prominent; the dire water crisis, an seemingly insurmountable obstacle for a vast army, immediately foreshadows the absolute necessity of divine intervention. This critical predicament sets the stage for God to demonstrate His power precisely where human strength and planning fail, building anticipation for the pivotal role the prophet Elisha will play in the subsequent narrative. There is also a strong element of Irony in the kings' strategic choice. Their deliberate "compass of seven days' journey," intended as a tactical advantage to surprise the enemy, inadvertently leads them into a wilderness devoid of water, transforming their calculated maneuver into their greatest vulnerability. This ironic twist powerfully highlights the unpredictable nature of warfare and the inherent limitations of human foresight. Furthermore, the abrupt and concise statement "and there was no water" creates a palpable sense of Suspense, immediately elevating the tension and urgency of the narrative, compelling the reader to wonder how such a powerful alliance will possibly overcome this fundamental and life-threatening challenge to their very survival.
Theological and Thematic Connections
2 Kings 3:9 functions as a profound theological statement on the inherent limitations of human power and the ultimate sovereignty of God. Even the combined might, strategic brilliance, and vast resources of three kings, commanding a formidable army, are rendered utterly helpless in the face of a basic physical need like water. This verse powerfully illustrates the biblical truth that human strength, resources, and meticulous planning, no matter how extensive or well-executed, are ultimately insufficient when confronted with circumstances beyond our control. It underscores the divine principle that God often allows His people to reach the absolute end of their own resources so that His power, provision, and faithfulness might be clearly and undeniably displayed. The crisis of water is thus not merely a logistical problem but a divinely orchestrated setup, designed to humble the kings, expose their dependence, and compel them to seek the Lord, thereby demonstrating that true victory, sustenance, and deliverance come from Him alone.
Reflection and Application
The desperate situation of the three kings in 2 Kings 3:9 offers timeless and profound lessons for our own lives. It serves as a powerful reminder that even our most meticulously planned endeavors, backed by significant resources, strategic alliances, and considerable personal effort, are not immune to unforeseen obstacles, environmental challenges, or sudden, debilitating crises. Life frequently presents us with our own "waterless wildernesses" where our ingenuity, strength, accumulated resources, and past successes prove utterly insufficient. This passage calls us to cultivate a profound humility, recognizing that there are inevitable moments when human solutions and self-reliance will fail, forcing us to confront our absolute dependence on a higher power. It challenges us to honestly examine whether we truly seek God's guidance, wisdom, and provision before a crisis forces our hand, or if we primarily rely on our own capabilities and strength until we are at the very brink of despair. The kings' subsequent turning to Elisha (as vividly depicted in the verses immediately following) highlights the critical and indispensable importance of seeking spiritual counsel and divine intervention when our human efforts have reached their absolute limit, thereby fostering a deeper and more abiding trust in God's sovereign ability to provide even in the most desolate and seemingly hopeless circumstances.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did they take a seven-day journey through the wilderness instead of a more direct route?
While the text does not explicitly state the reason, biblical scholars generally agree that this was a deliberate strategic military decision. A more direct route from Israel to Moab would have likely involved crossing the Jordan River and traversing more heavily fortified Moabite territory, potentially leading to immediate and costly engagements. By taking a "compass" or circuitous route through the wilderness of Edom (which lay south of Judah), the allied kings likely aimed to achieve a tactical surprise by approaching the Moabites from an unexpected direction, or to avoid direct confrontation with well-defended Moabite strongholds. This longer, more arduous path was a calculated risk, which unfortunately led them into the severe and unforeseen water shortage described in the verse.
What was the significance of the "cattle" running out of water alongside the "host"?
The inclusion of "cattle" (livestock) alongside the "host" (soldiers) highlights the absolute severity and comprehensive nature of the crisis. In ancient warfare, animals were not merely for food; they were indispensable for transport, carrying vital supplies, equipment, and provisions for the vast army. Without water, these animals would quickly become incapacitated, die, or be unable to carry their burdens, crippling the army's mobility, logistical support, and overall operational capacity. An army without its transport animals was effectively stranded, vulnerable, and unable to sustain itself or advance. Therefore, the lack of water for the cattle was as critically debilitating as for the soldiers themselves, threatening the entire expedition's survival and success.
How does this verse set up the rest of the chapter?
This verse serves as the narrative's crucial pivot point and catalyst. By establishing a dire, life-threatening crisis that human strength, military might, and strategic planning cannot resolve, it creates an urgent and undeniable need for divine intervention. This desperation forces the kings, particularly Jehoram of Israel (who was not known for his faithfulness to the Lord), to acknowledge their utter helplessness and seek the Lord's counsel through His prophet Elisha. The water crisis thus becomes the essential narrative driver for the subsequent events, where God demonstrates His power and faithfulness through Elisha, miraculously providing water and ultimately delivering victory. This sequence powerfully underscores the overarching theme of divine sovereignty over human limitations. The crisis compels them to recognize that their only hope lies in God, as vividly seen when King Jehoram asks Jehoshaphat, "Is there not here a prophet of the Lord, that we may inquire of the Lord by him?".
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The desperate thirst of the allied armies in 2 Kings 3:9, stranded and perishing in a waterless wilderness, serves as a profound Old Testament echo of humanity's spiritual destitution and its inherent, profound need for divine provision. Just as the physical lack of water threatened the very existence of the "host" and their "cattle," so too does the spiritual wilderness of sin leave all humanity parched, helpless, and perishing without the life-giving presence and provision of God. This ancient crisis powerfully foreshadows the ultimate and eternal solution found solely in Jesus Christ, who declared Himself to be the very source of "living water." Where the kings sought a prophet to bring temporary physical relief, Christ offers eternal spiritual sustenance and an unending supply of grace. He is the one who promises, "Whoever drinks of the water that I will give him will never be thirsty again; but the water that I will give him will become in him a spring of water springing up to eternal life" (John 4:14). Furthermore, on the last and greatest day of the Feast of Tabernacles, Jesus stood and cried out, inviting all who thirst: "If anyone is thirsty, let him come to me and drink. Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, 'Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.'" (John 7:37-38). The physical deliverance experienced by the armies through Elisha's prophecy points forward to the infinitely greater spiritual deliverance and eternal life offered through Christ, who satisfies the deepest longings of the human soul and leads His people out of the barren wilderness of sin into the abundant, everlasting life found only in Him, ultimately leading to the "spring of the water of life" freely given to the thirsty in the new creation (Revelation 21:6).