Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Were not the Ethiopians and the Lubims a huge host, with very many chariots and horsemen? yet, because thou didst rely on the LORD, he delivered them into thine hand.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Were not the Ethiopians H3569 and the Lubims H3864 a huge H7230 host H2428, with very H3966 many H7235 chariots H7393 and horsemen H6571? yet, because thou didst rely H8172 on the LORD H3068, he delivered H5414 them into thine hand H3027.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The army of the Ethiopians and Luvim was huge, wasn't it? How many chariots and horsemen did they have? Yet because you relied on ADONAI, he handed them over to you.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Were not the Cushites and Libyans a vast army with many chariots and horsemen? Yet because you relied on the LORD, He delivered them into your hand.
Ask
American Standard Version
Were not the Ethiopians and the Lubim a huge host, with chariots and horsemen exceeding many? yet, because thou didst rely on Jehovah, he delivered them into thy hand.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Weren’t the Ethiopians and the Lubim a huge army, with chariots and horsemen exceeding many? Yet, because you relied on the LORD, he delivered them into your hand.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
The Ethiopians and the Lubims, were they not a great hoste with charets and horsemen, exceeding many? yet because thou diddest rest vpon the Lord, he deliuered them into thine had.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Did not the Cushim and the Lubim become a very great force for multitude, for chariot, and for horsemen? and in thy leaning on Jehovah He gave them into thy hand,
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Second Chronicles 16:8 encapsulates a potent prophetic rebuke from Hanani to King Asa, recalling a miraculous past victory over the formidable Ethiopian and Lubim armies. This rhetorical question serves to highlight Asa's earlier, faithful reliance on the LORD, which resulted in divine deliverance despite overwhelming odds. Hanani uses this historical precedent to underscore Asa's present spiritual failure, specifically his decision to trust in a human alliance with Syria rather than seeking God's aid. The verse powerfully affirms God's unwavering faithfulness to those who depend on Him, while simultaneously exposing the spiritual peril of wavering faith and reliance on worldly strength.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within the latter part of King Asa's reign, specifically during Hanani the seer's confrontation with him in 2 Chronicles 16. The immediate preceding verses (16:1-7) detail Asa's strategic misstep: instead of seeking the LORD's help against King Baasha of Israel, he formed a costly alliance with Ben-hadad, king of Syria, even using treasures from the temple to secure it. Hanani's rebuke in verse 7 directly challenges this lack of trust. Verse 8 then serves as the climactic rhetorical question, drawing a direct parallel to Asa's earlier, exemplary faith during the invasion of Zerah the Ethiopian, recorded in 2 Chronicles 14:9-15. In that account, Asa, faced with an army of a million men, cried out to God, and the LORD granted a decisive, miraculous victory. Hanani's pointed question forces Asa to confront the inconsistency between his past reliance on God and his current pragmatic, faithless decision.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The mention of the Ethiopians (Cushites) and Lubims (Libyans) immediately signals a grave military threat in the ancient Near East. These were formidable powers, particularly the Cushite dynasty that ruled Egypt at the time, known for their vast armies and significant chariot forces. Zerah the Ethiopian's invasion, as detailed in 2 Chronicles 14, was not a minor skirmish but a massive military campaign, with an army numbering a million men and three hundred chariots. In the ancient world, chariots were the pinnacle of military technology, akin to modern tanks, symbolizing overwhelming power and speed. For Judah, a comparatively smaller kingdom, facing such a "huge host" would have been an existential crisis, a seemingly insurmountable challenge by conventional military means. The cultural norm of the era dictated seeking powerful alliances or capitulating to such a force. Asa's initial response of fervent prayer and complete reliance on God, therefore, was a radical departure from typical strategic thinking, making God's subsequent, total deliverance all the more astounding and memorable within the historical consciousness of Judah.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully articulates several foundational themes central to the book of Chronicles and broader biblical theology. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Divine Deliverance, demonstrating God's absolute sovereignty and power to save His people from impossible odds. The defeat of the "huge host" of Ethiopians and Lubims was not a result of Judah's military might but solely of divine intervention, illustrating that "the battle is the LORD's" as proclaimed in 1 Samuel 17:47. Secondly, the verse highlights the crucial importance of Reliance on the LORD. Hanani explicitly states that the victory was "because thou didst rely on the LORD," thereby establishing faith and dependent trust as the decisive factor in securing God's favor and miraculous aid. This principle resonates deeply with the wisdom literature, such as Proverbs 3:5-6, which admonishes believers to trust in the LORD with all their heart and not lean on their own understanding. Finally, the verse serves as a poignant reminder of the necessity of Remembering God's Past Faithfulness. Hanani's rebuke hinges on Asa's failure to recall and apply the profound lesson from his own recent history, urging believers to remember God's prior acts of deliverance as a steadfast foundation for present and future trust, a theme echoed by the psalmist in Psalm 77:11.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • host (Hebrew, chayil', H2428): This word, derived from a root meaning "to be strong," signifies a force, whether of men, means, or other resources. In this context, it refers to an army, emphasizing its formidable strength, might, and military prowess. The "huge host" of the Ethiopians and Lubims highlights their overwhelming numbers and the sheer power they represented, making Judah's victory all the more miraculous and clearly attributable to divine intervention rather than human strength.
  • rely (Hebrew, sha'an', H8172): This verb denotes leaning upon, resting upon, or being supported by something or someone. It implies a deep, unwavering dependence and trust, not merely a superficial belief. When applied to King Asa's action, it signifies his complete commitment of his fate, security, and strategic hope to the LORD alone, acknowledging God as the ultimate source of help and protection. Asa's act of sha'an on the LORD was the direct, causal factor in his earlier victory.
  • hand (Hebrew, yad', H3027): While literally meaning "hand," in this context, "into thine hand" is a powerful idiom signifying complete control, mastery, and triumph. It conveys that God granted Asa absolute dominion and victory over his enemies, placing them entirely under his authority. This idiom emphasizes that the victory was not a result of human effort or strategic brilliance, but a direct, intentional act of God, demonstrating His power to subdue even the most formidable adversaries and deliver them into the hands of His chosen servant.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Were not the Ethiopians and the Lubims a huge host, with very many chariots and horsemen?": This opening clause functions as a potent rhetorical question posed by Hanani to King Asa. Its purpose is not to solicit information but to elicit an undeniable "yes," compelling Asa to acknowledge the overwhelming military superiority of Zerah's invading army. The vivid description of a "huge host" and "very many chariots and horsemen" emphasizes the seemingly insurmountable odds that Judah faced, setting the stage for the crucial point about divine intervention and contrasting sharply with Asa's current lack of faith.
  • "yet, because thou didst rely on the LORD,": This pivotal clause introduces a sharp contrast to the overwhelming military might previously described, using the conjunction "yet" to highlight the unexpected outcome. The phrase "because thou didst rely on the LORD" explicitly identifies Asa's profound faith and complete dependence on God as the sole, determining factor in the miraculous victory. It underscores a fundamental theological principle: divine action and deliverance are often contingent upon human trust and obedience, demonstrating the supremacy of faith over military strength or human strategy.
  • "he delivered them into thine hand.": This concluding clause unequivocally declares the glorious result of Asa's reliance on the LORD. "He delivered them" attributes the victory directly and solely to God's sovereign power, removing any possibility of human boasting. The idiomatic phrase "into thine hand" further emphasizes that God granted Asa complete control, mastery, and triumph over the formidable enemy. This was not a mere stroke of luck but a direct, intentional act of God, showcasing His faithfulness to those who place their unwavering trust in Him.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several potent literary devices to convey its message with force and clarity. The most prominent is the Rhetorical Question ("Were not the Ethiopians and the Lubims a huge host...?"), which is not intended to be answered but rather to provoke profound reflection and underscore an undeniable truth already known to both the speaker and the listener. This device powerfully reminds Asa of a past, miraculous event that should have profoundly shaped his present actions. There is also a strong element of Contrast, juxtaposing the overwhelming numerical and technological superiority of the enemy ("huge host, with very many chariots and horsemen") with the singular, spiritual reason for Judah's victory ("because thou didst rely on the LORD"). This contrast highlights the miraculous and disproportionate nature of God's deliverance. Furthermore, the description of the enemy uses Hyperbole ("huge host," "very many chariots") to emphasize the seemingly insurmountable odds, thereby magnifying the impressiveness of God's intervention. Finally, the idiom "delivered them into thine hand" functions as Metonymy, where "hand" represents power, control, and ultimate victory, effectively conveying God's act of granting complete dominion over the enemy to Asa.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

2 Chronicles 16:8 profoundly articulates the enduring theological truth that God's power is limitless and not constrained by human weakness or the might of adversaries. It asserts that genuine security, lasting victory, and true wisdom are found not in human alliances, military prowess, or strategic cunning, but in unwavering, dependent trust in the LORD. This passage serves as a timeless reminder that God honors faith, often intervening in ways that defy natural explanation to demonstrate His absolute sovereignty and unshakeable faithfulness. Asa's earlier triumph over the Ethiopians and Lubims was a powerful testament to this principle, and Hanani's subsequent rebuke highlights the spiritual danger of forgetting God's past faithfulness and succumbing to fear or worldly pragmatism in the face of new challenges. The verse thus underscores the consistent biblical theme that God delights in delivering His people when they place their full reliance upon Him, proving Himself faithful even in the most impossible circumstances.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

This verse offers both a profound challenge and immense comfort for believers navigating the complexities of contemporary life. It compels us to honestly examine the object of our trust when confronting life's "huge hosts"—whether these manifest as overwhelming personal crises, daunting professional pressures, intense spiritual battles, or pervasive societal challenges. Like King Asa, we often face situations where human solutions, strategic alliances, or our own perceived strength appear more immediate or reliable than divine intervention. Yet, Hanani's words serve as a timeless reminder that God's power is most profoundly magnified in our weakness, and His deliverance is assured when our reliance is placed solely and unreservedly on Him. The call is to diligently remember God's past faithfulness, both in our personal narratives and in the grand sweep of redemptive history, allowing those memories to bolster our faith in present difficulties. We are encouraged to cultivate a continuous, dependent relationship with God, choosing to lean on Him fully even when the odds appear insurmountable, and to resolutely resist the temptation to compromise our faith by seeking worldly solutions that bypass or diminish our trust in divine provision.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "huge hosts" or overwhelming challenges are you currently facing that tempt you to rely on human solutions, resources, or alliances rather than wholeheartedly on God?
  • Can you recall specific instances in your past, or in the history of God's people, where God delivered against seemingly impossible odds? How can remembering these strengthen your faith and trust in Him today?
  • In what areas of your life might you be subtly or overtly trusting in "chariots and horsemen" (human strength, financial security, influential connections) instead of fully relying on the LORD's sovereign power and provision?

FAQ

Who were the Ethiopians and the Lubims, and why were they considered such a formidable threat?

Answer: The Ethiopians (Hebrew: Cushites) and the Lubims (Libyans) were powerful nations located to the south and west of Judah, respectively. The Ethiopians, particularly under Zerah (who may have been an Egyptian pharaoh of Cushite origin or a prominent general), commanded vast armies renowned for their sheer numbers and military prowess. The Lubims were their allies, contributing significant forces to their campaigns. They were considered a formidable threat because their combined army, as recorded in 2 Chronicles 14:9, numbered a million men and three hundred chariots—an overwhelmingly superior force compared to Judah's relatively smaller army. Their presence represented an existential threat to the kingdom of Judah, making King Asa's victory over them, achieved through divine intervention, all the more miraculous and a testament to God's power.

Why does Hanani remind King Asa of this specific past victory?

Answer: Hanani reminds King Asa of this past victory to highlight the king's spiritual inconsistency and to deliver a sharp rebuke for his current lack of faith. In the earlier conflict against the Ethiopians and Lubims (detailed in 2 Chronicles 14), Asa had fully relied on the LORD, crying out to Him in prayer, and God granted a decisive victory against seemingly impossible odds. However, in the current situation, facing a lesser threat from King Baasha of Israel, Asa chose to rely on a human alliance with Ben-hadad of Syria, even using temple treasures to secure it (2 Chronicles 16:2-3). Hanani's rhetorical question serves to starkly contrast Asa's past faithfulness with his present unfaithfulness, emphasizing that if God could deliver him from a million-man army, He certainly could have delivered him from Baasha without human compromise. It underscores the timeless principle that God's power and provision are always sufficient for those who trust Him completely.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The historical deliverance of Judah from the overwhelming forces of the Ethiopians and Lubims, achieved through King Asa's faithful reliance on the LORD, serves as a powerful Old Testament type pointing to the ultimate and perfect deliverance wrought by Jesus Christ. Just as God delivered His people from an impossible physical foe, Christ delivers humanity from the far more formidable spiritual enemies of sin, death, and the devil. The "huge host" of chariots and horsemen finds its ultimate parallel in the spiritual powers and principalities against which believers contend, as described in Ephesians 6:12. Yet, Christ, through His sacrificial death on the cross and triumphant resurrection, disarmed these powers and made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them (Colossians 2:15). Our reliance, like Asa's, is not on our own strength, wisdom, or human alliances, but entirely upon the finished work of Christ. He is the true Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), and through faith in Him, we are granted victory over every spiritual foe. The victory that Asa experienced was a shadow; the reality is found in Jesus, who has overcome the world (John 16:33) and in whom we can do all things through His strengthening power (Philippians 4:13). He is the ultimate Deliverer, and our faith in Him ensures our eternal triumph and spiritual freedom.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Chronicles 16 verses 7–14

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Here is, I. A plain and faithful reproof given to Asa by a prophet of the Lord, for making this league with Baasha. The reprover was Hanani the seer, the father of Jehu, another prophet, whom we read of Kg1 16:1; Ch2 19:2. We observed several things amiss in Asa's treaty with Benhadad. But that which the prophet here charges upon him as the greatest fault he was guilty of in that matter is his relying on the king of Syria and not on the Lord his God, Ch2 16:7. He thought that, though God was on his side, this would not stand him in stead unless he had Benhadad on his side, that God either could not or would not help him, but he must take this indirect course to help himself. Note, God is much displeased when he is distrusted and when an arm of flesh is relied on more than his power and goodness. By putting our confidence in God we give honour to him, and therefore he thinks himself affronted if we give that honour to another. He plainly tells the king that herein he had done foolishly, Ch2 16:9. It is a foolish thing to lean on a broken reed, when we have the rock of ages to rely upon. To convince him of his folly he shows him,

1.That he acted against his experience, Ch2 16:8. He, of all men, had no reason to distrust God, who had found him such a present powerful helper, by whom he had been made to triumph over a threatening enemy, as his father before him, because he relied upon the Lord his God, Ch2 13:18; Ch2 14:11. "What!" said the prophet, "Were not the Ethiopians and the Lubim a huge host, enough to swallow up a kingdom? And yet, because thou didst rely on the Lord, he delivered them into thy hand; and was not he sufficient to help thee against Baasha?" Note, The many experiences we have had of the goodness of God to us aggravate our distrust of him. Has he not helped us in six troubles? And have we any reason to suspect him in the seventh? But see how deceitful our hearts are! We trust in God when we have nothing else to trust to, when need drives us to him; but, when we have other things to stay on, we are apt to stay too much on them and to lean on our own understanding as long as that has any thing to offer; but a believing confidence will be in God only, when a smiling world courts it most.

2.That he acted against his knowledge of God and his providence, Ch2 16:9. Asa could not be ignorant that the eyes of the Lord run to and fro through the earth, strongly to hold with those (so it may be read) whose heart is perfect towards him; that is, (1.) That God governs the world in infinite wisdom, and the creatures, and all their actions, are continually under his eye. The eye of Providence is quick-sighted - it runs; it is intent - it runs to and fro; it reaches far - through the whole earth, no corner of which is from under it, not the most dark or distant; and his eye directs his hand, and the arm of his power; for he shows himself strong. Does Satan walk to and fro in the earth? Providence runs to and fro, is never out of the way, never to seek, never at a loss. (2.) That God governs the world for the good of his people, does all in pursuance of the counsels of his love concerning their salvation, all for Jacob his servant's sake, and Israel his elect, Isa 45:4. Christ is head over all things to his church, Eph 1:22. (3.) That those whose hearts are upright with him may be sure of his protection and have all the reason in the world to depend upon it. He is able to protect them in the way of their duty (for wisdom and might are his), and he actually intends their protection. A practical disbelief of this is at the bottom of all our departures from God and double-dealing with him. Asa could not trust God and therefore made court to Benhadad.

3.That he acted against his interest. (1.) He had lost an opportunity of checking the growing greatness of the king of Syria, (Ch2 16:7): His host has escaped out of thy hand, which otherwise would have joined with Baasha's and fallen with it. (2.) He had incurred God's displeasure and henceforth must expect no peace, but the constant alarms of war, Ch2 16:9. Those that cannot find in their hearts to trust God forfeit his protection and throw themselves out of it.

II. Asa's displeasure at this reproof. Though it came from God by one that was known to be his messenger, though the reproof was just and the reasoning fair, and all intended for his good, yet he was wroth with the seer for telling him of his folly; nay, he was in a rage with him, Ch2 16:10. Is this Asa? Is this he whose heart was perfect with the Lord all his days? Well, let him that thinks he stands take heed lest he fall. A wise man, and yet in a rage! An Israelite, and yet in a rage with a prophet! A good man, and yet impatient of reproof, and that cannot bear to be told of his faults! Lord, what is man, when God leaves him to himself? Those that idolize their own conduct cannot bear contradiction; and those that indulge a peevish passionate temper may be transported by it into impieties as well as into indecencies, and will, some time or other, fly in the face of God himself. See what gall and wormwood this root of bitterness bore. 1. In his rage he committed the prophet to the jail, put him in a prison-house, as a malefactor, in the stocks (so some read it,) or into little-ease. God's prophets meet with many that cannot bear reproof, but take it much amiss, yet they must do their duty. 2. Having proceeded thus far, he oppressed some of the people, probably such as owned the prophet in his sufferings, or were known to be his particular friends. He that abused his power for the persecuting of God's prophet was left to himself further to abuse it for the crushing of his own subjects, whereby he weakened himself and lost his interest. Most persecutors have been tyrants.

III. His sickness. Two years before he died he was diseased in his feet (Ch2 16:12), afflicted with the gout in a high degree. He had put the prophet in the stocks, and now God put him in the stocks; so his punishment answered his sin. His disease was exceedingly great; it came to the height (so some); it flew up to his head (so others), and then it was mortal. This was his affliction; but his sin was that in his disease, instead of seeking to the Lord for relief, he sought to the physicians. His making use of physicians was his duty; but trusting to them, and expecting that from them which was to be had from God only, were his sin and folly. The help of creatures must always be used with an eye to the Creator, and in dependence upon him, who makes every creature that to us which it is, and without whom the most skilful and faithful are physicians of no value. Some think that these physicians were strangers to the commonwealth of Israel, and were a sort of conjurers, to whom he applied as if there were not a God in Israel.

IV. His death and burial. His funeral had something of extraordinary solemnity in it, Ch2 16:14. They made a very magnificent burying for him. I am loth to think (as some do) that he himself ordered this funeral pomp, and that it was an instance of his vanity, that he would be buried like the Gentiles, and not after the way of the Jews. It is said indeed, He digged the sepulchre for himself, as one mindful of his grave; but I am willing to believe that this funeral pomp was rather an expression of the great respect his people retained for him, notwithstanding the failings and infirmities of his latter days. It was agreed to do him honour at his death. Note, The eminent piety and usefulness of good men ought to be remembered to their praise, though they have had their blemishes. Let their faults be buried in their graves, while their services are remembered over their graves. He that said, There is not a just man that doeth good and sinneth not, yet said also, The memory of the just is blessed; and let it be so.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 7–14. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Chronicles 16:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.