1 Samuel 27:8

Translation
King James Version
¶ And David and his men went up, and invaded the Geshurites, and the Gezrites, and the Amalekites: for those nations were of old the inhabitants of the land, as thou goest to Shur, even unto the land of Egypt.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And David H1732 and his men H582 went up H5927, and invaded H6584 the Geshurites H1651, and the Gezrites H1511, and the Amalekites H6003: for those H2007 nations were of old H5769 the inhabitants H3427 of the land H776, as thou goest H935 to Shur H7793, even unto the land H776 of Egypt H4714.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
he and his men began going up and raiding the G'shuri, the Gizri and the 'Amaleki (from ancient times these people had lived in the land in the direction of Shur, all the way to Egypt).
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Now David and his men went up and raided the Geshurites, the Girzites, and the Amalekites. (From ancient times these people had inhabited the land extending to Shur and Egypt.)
Ask
American Standard Version
And David and his men went up, and made a raid upon the Geshurites, and the Girzites, and the Amalekites; for those nations were the inhabitants of the land, who were of old, as thou goest to Shur, even unto the land of Egypt.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
David and his men went up, and made a raid on the Geshurites, and the Girzites, and the Amalekites; for those were the inhabitants of the land, who were of old, as you go to Shur, even to the land of Egypt.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then Dauid and his men went vp, and inuaded the Geshurites, and the Girzites, and the Amalekites: for they inhabited the lande from the beginning, from the way, as thou goest to Shur, euen vnto the lande of Egypt.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and David goeth up and his men, and they push unto the Geshurite, and the Gerizite, and the Amalekite, (for they are inhabitants of the land from of old), as thou comest in to Shur and unto the land of Egypt,
Ask
See also
1 Samuel 15:71 Samuel 15:8Joshua 13:2Joshua 13:13Judges 1:29Joshua 16:10Exodus 15:22
See on the biblical-era map
David Among the Philistines
David Among the Philistines View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 7,939 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Samuel 27:8 describes David's strategic military operations while he was in exile from King Saul, living under the protection of Achish, the Philistine king of Gath. From his base in Ziklag, David and his men conducted raids not against Israelite towns, as he falsely reported to Achish, but against ancient, non-Israelite tribes—the Geshurites, Gezrites, and Amalekites—who inhabited the southern regions bordering Egypt. These actions served both to secure provisions and maintain his deception with Achish, while simultaneously weakening Israel's historical adversaries in a manner that subtly aligned with God's long-standing judgment against them.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within a critical and morally complex phase of David's life, immediately following his decision to flee Israel and seek refuge with the Philistines in 1 Samuel 27:1. Having been granted the city of Ziklag by King Achish, David found himself in a precarious position, needing to demonstrate loyalty to his Philistine overlord while simultaneously protecting his own people and avoiding direct conflict with Judah. The preceding verses establish David's desperate situation and his cunning plan to deceive Achish by claiming to raid Judahite towns while secretly attacking other nations. Verse 8 specifically identifies the true targets of these raids, setting the stage for the elaborate deception described in 1 Samuel 27:9-12, where David returns from his expeditions and presents the spoils as if taken from Israelite territory. This entire chapter highlights David's remarkable resourcefulness, strategic acumen, and the moral ambiguities he navigated during a period of intense pressure and reliance on his own wits for survival.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The tribes mentioned—the Geshurites, Gezrites, and Amalekites—were long-standing inhabitants of the southern Negev desert, a semi-arid region bordering the Sinai Peninsula and extending towards Egypt. These groups were distinct from the Philistines and the Israelites, often engaging in raiding themselves. The Amalekites, in particular, held a deep-seated enmity with Israel, dating back to their unprovoked attack on the Israelites in the wilderness after the Exodus, as recorded in Exodus 17:8-16. God had pronounced a perpetual war against them and commanded their utter destruction (see Deuteronomy 25:17-19), a command that King Saul had notoriously failed to fully execute, leading to his rejection as king (see 1 Samuel 15:1-9). David's raids against these tribes, therefore, carried significant historical and theological weight, even if his immediate motivation was personal survival and deception. The practice of raiding for sustenance and spoils was common in this ancient Near Eastern context, particularly among nomadic or semi-nomadic groups residing in borderlands.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes to several key themes within the broader narrative of 1 Samuel. Firstly, it underscores David's cunning and pragmatism, demonstrating his exceptional ability to navigate complex political and military situations, even resorting to deception to protect his men and secure his future. This highlights a recurring aspect of David's character—his capacity for both profound faith and shrewd, sometimes morally questionable, action. Secondly, it highlights the ongoing conflict between Israel and its ancient enemies, particularly the Amalekites, whose persistent hostility against God's people is a recurring motif throughout Israel's history. David's actions, even if flawed in their immediate context, inadvertently serve God's long-term purposes by weakening these foes, picking up where Saul had failed in 1 Samuel 15. Thirdly, the verse subtly touches upon the theme of divine providence, showing how God can work through imperfect human actions and ambiguous circumstances to advance His ultimate plan for Israel and its chosen king. David's survival and the weakening of Israel's enemies, even during his exile and through his deceptive means, are part of the larger narrative leading to his eventual enthronement as the legitimate king of Israel.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Invaded (Hebrew, pâshaṭ', H6584): This verb, וַיִּפְשְׁטוּ (vayyiphshuṭu), derived from the root H6584 (pâshaṭ), means "to spread out (i.e. deploy in hostile array); by analogy, to strip (i.e. unclothe, plunder, flay, etc.); fall upon, flay, invade, make an invasion, pull off, put off, make a road, run upon, rush, set, spoil, spread selves (abroad), strip (off, self)." In military contexts, as here, it specifically denotes a sudden, swift, and often predatory incursion or raid, typically for plunder or destruction. It implies a targeted, aggressive attack with a clear objective, fitting David's calculated military expeditions aimed at acquiring resources and weakening enemy tribes. The term suggests a decisive and aggressive action, not merely a defensive maneuver.
  • Of old (Hebrew, ʻôwlâm', H5769): The term מֵעוֹלָם (me'olam), derived from H5769 (ʻôwlâm), means "properly, concealed, i.e. the vanishing point; generally, time out of mind (past or future), i.e. (practically) eternity; frequentatively, adverbial (especially with prepositional prefix) always; alway(-s), ancient (time), any more, continuance, eternal, (for, (n-)) ever(-lasting, -more, of old), lasting, long (time), (of) old (time), perpetual, at any time, (beginning of the) world ([phrase] without end)." In this context, "of old" emphasizes the long-established, ancient presence of these tribes in the land, highlighting their deep historical roots and not merely a recent migration. This detail underscores that David was striking at deeply entrenched adversaries with a long history in the region.
  • Inhabitants (Hebrew, yâshab', H3427): The word יֹשְׁבֵי (yosheve), derived from H3427 (yâshab), means "properly, to sit down (specifically as judge. in ambush, in quiet); by implication, to dwell, to remain; causatively, to settle, to marry; (make to) abide(-ing), continue, (cause to, make to) dwell(-ing), ease self, endure, establish, [idiom] fail, habitation, haunt, (make to) inhabit(-ant), make to keep (house), lurking, [idiom] marry(-ing), (bring again to) place, remain, return, seat, set(-tle), (down-) sit(-down, still, -ting down, -ting (place) -uate), take, tarry." Here, it refers to those who are "dwelling" or "settled" in the land, confirming that these were not transient groups but established communities. This reinforces the idea that David's targets were fixed populations with a long-standing presence in the specified geographical area.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And David and his men went up, and invaded the Geshurites, and the Gezrites, and the Amalekites:": This clause describes the direct and calculated military action taken by David and his 600 loyal followers. The phrase "went up" (וַיַּעַל, vayya‘al) often denotes a movement towards a higher elevation or a journey inland from a coastal plain, consistent with Ziklag's location in the Negev. The act of "invading" (וַיִּפְשְׁטוּ, vayyiphshuṭu) signifies a swift, aggressive military raid aimed at plunder and weakening the enemy. The specific naming of the Geshurites, Gezrites, and Amalekites is crucial, identifying these as non-Israelite groups who were historical adversaries, distinct from the Judahite or other Israelite tribes David claimed to be attacking in his deception of Achish.
  • "for those [nations were] of old the inhabitants of the land,": This parenthetical explanation provides the rationale and justification for David's choice of targets. It clarifies that these tribes were not new threats but long-standing occupants of the region, emphasizing their established presence and, implicitly, their historical antagonism towards Israel. This detail legitimizes David's actions from an Israelite perspective, even if his immediate motives were self-preservation and deception. It also subtly connects to the divine mandate for Israel to dispossess the inhabitants of the land, aligning David's actions with a broader, divinely ordained purpose.
  • "as thou goest to Shur, even unto the land of Egypt.": This phrase precisely delineates the geographical scope of David's operations, providing critical context for his strategic choices. The "way to Shur" (דֶּרֶךְ שׁוּר, derekh Shur) refers to the ancient caravan route and desert region stretching from the southern border of Judah towards Egypt, often associated with the wilderness of Shur. "Even unto the land of Egypt" further specifies the deep southern reach of these tribes' territories, indicating that David was operating far from Israelite settlements, in a region known for its harshness and its role as a buffer zone between Israel and Egypt. This geographical detail confirms David's strategic choice of targets, avoiding any direct conflict with Israelite territory and ensuring his deception of Achish would be plausible.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several literary devices that enrich its meaning and provide deeper insight into David's character and the narrative. Geographical Specificity is prominent, with the precise mention of "Shur" and "the land of Egypt" grounding David's actions in a tangible, historical landscape. This detail not only provides verisimilitude but also highlights the strategic remoteness of David's operations from Israelite lands, which was crucial for maintaining his deception. There is also a strong element of Dramatic Irony at play; the reader knows David is raiding Israel's ancient enemies, fulfilling a divine mandate (especially concerning the Amalekites), while Achish believes David is attacking his own people. This creates a tension between David's outward performance and his true intentions and actions, underscoring his cunning and the complexity of his moral choices. Furthermore, the verse, particularly through the targeting of the Amalekites, subtly employs Foreshadowing. David's actions here anticipate his future role as king, where he will decisively defeat the Amalekites in 1 Samuel 30, fulfilling a command that King Saul had failed to carry out. This subtly underscores David's fitness for kingship in contrast to Saul's disobedience and foreshadows his eventual rise to power.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Samuel 27:8, despite describing a period of moral compromise and strategic deception for David, reveals God's overarching providence and sovereign hand at work. David's actions, driven by self-preservation and the need to maintain his cover with Achish, nonetheless served to weaken Israel's long-standing enemies, particularly the Amalekites, against whom God had pronounced a perpetual war (see Exodus 17:16). This demonstrates that even when God's chosen instruments act outside His explicit moral will or operate in ambiguous circumstances, He can sovereignly weave their flawed choices into His larger redemptive plan. The verse reminds us that God's purposes are not thwarted by human imperfection but can even be advanced through complex and morally ambiguous situations, ultimately showcasing His faithfulness to His covenant people and His commitment to their protection and the establishment of His kingdom.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

David's period in Ziklag, marked by the raids described in 1 Samuel 27:8, offers a complex picture for reflection that challenges simplistic notions of faithfulness. While his deception of Achish is not to be emulated, his resilience, strategic thinking, and unwavering determination to protect his men and secure their future are noteworthy. In our own lives, we often face periods of "exile" or profound uncertainty, where circumstances push us to the limits of our faith, resources, and ingenuity. This passage reminds us that even in these challenging seasons, God remains sovereign, capable of working through our imperfect actions and guiding us towards His ultimate purposes. It challenges us to consider how we navigate difficult ethical dilemmas, trusting in God's provision while striving for integrity in a fallen world. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of discerning and confronting the "Amalekites" in our spiritual lives—those persistent sins, destructive habits, or spiritual adversaries that hinder our walk with God and oppose His kingdom. While David used physical warfare, our battle is spiritual, requiring the armor of God and reliance on His truth, not deception, to overcome the forces of darkness.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does David's strategic thinking in this passage, despite its moral ambiguity, challenge or affirm your understanding of leadership in difficult and compromising circumstances?
  • In what "exile" or challenging season of life might you currently find yourself, and how can you trust in God's sovereign providence even when your path is unclear or requires difficult choices?
  • What "Amalekites" (persistent spiritual adversaries, sinful patterns, or external pressures) in your life require decisive, Spirit-led action, and how might you engage in that spiritual warfare with integrity and reliance on God's strength?

FAQ

Why did David raid these specific tribes and not others?

Answer: David raided the Geshurites, Gezrites, and Amalekites for several strategic reasons, all while meticulously maintaining his deception of King Achish. Firstly, these tribes were ancient, non-Israelite inhabitants of the southern Negev region, bordering Israel but distinct from the Israelite territories. By attacking them, David avoided harming any Israelite towns or people, which would have been a betrayal of his own heritage and future kingdom. This was crucial for his long-term legitimacy as Israel's king. Secondly, the Amalekites, in particular, were long-standing, bitter enemies of Israel, against whom God had commanded perpetual war (see Exodus 17:16). David's actions, therefore, served to weaken a significant adversary of Israel, even if his immediate motivation was self-preservation and the acquisition of spoils for his men. This indirectly fulfilled a divine mandate that King Saul had failed to execute. Thirdly, these raids provided the necessary plunder (sheep, oxen, donkeys, camels, and clothing, as mentioned in 1 Samuel 27:9) to sustain David and his 600 men, allowing him to maintain his appearance of loyalty to Achish by presenting these spoils as if they were taken from Judahite territory. This cunning strategy allowed David to survive, grow his forces, and indirectly fulfill God's purposes against Israel's enemies, all while operating under the Philistine king's nose.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While David's actions in 1 Samuel 27:8 reveal his human ingenuity and strategic prowess, they also expose the moral ambiguities and limitations of even a "man after God's own heart." His reliance on deception and his need to fight physical battles against earthly enemies point to the profound need for a greater King and a more perfect deliverance. Jesus Christ is the ultimate fulfillment of David's kingship, operating not from a place of exile and deception, but from divine authority and perfect truth. Unlike David, who fought against the Geshurites, Gezrites, and Amalekites, Jesus came to defeat the true spiritual enemies of humanity: sin, death, and the devil (see Hebrews 2:14-15). He did not engage in cunning raids for plunder but offered His own life as a perfect sacrifice, securing eternal victory through His atoning work on the cross (see Colossians 2:15). Where David's victories were partial and temporary, Jesus' triumph is complete and everlasting, establishing a kingdom that is not of this world but is spiritual and eternal (see John 18:36). He offers true freedom from spiritual bondage (see Galatians 5:1) and leads His people in a spiritual warfare against the powers of darkness, not with carnal weapons but with divine truth and love (see Ephesians 6:10-18). Thus, David's strategic battles foreshadow the decisive, spiritual warfare waged and won by the Lamb of God, who truly takes away the sin of the world and establishes an everlasting kingdom (see John 1:29 and Revelation 11:15).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Samuel 27 verses 8–12

Here is an account of David's actions while he was in the land of the Philistines, a fierce attack he made upon some remains of the devoted nations, his success in it, and the representation he gave of it to Achish. 1. We may acquit him of injustice and cruelty in this action because those people whom he cut off were such as heaven had long since doomed to destruction, and he that did it was one whom heaven had ordained to dominion; so that the thing was very fit to be done, and he was very fit to do it. It was not for him that was anointed to fight the Lord's battles to sit still in sloth, however he might think fit, in modesty, to retire. He desired to be safe from Saul only that he might expose himself for Israel. He avenged an old quarrel that God had with these nations, and at the same time fetched in provisions for himself and his army, for by their swords they must live. The Amalekites were to be all cut off. Probably the Geshurites and Gezrites were branches of Amalek. Saul was rejected for sparing them, David makes up the deficiency of his obedience before he succeeds him. He smote them, and left none alive, Sa1 27:8, Sa1 27:9. The service paid itself, for they carried off abundance of spoil, which served for the subsistence of David's forces. 2. Yet we cannot acquit him of dissimulation with Achish in the account he gave him of this expedition. (1.) David, it seems, was not willing that he should know the truth, and therefore spared none to carry tidings to Gath (Sa1 27:11), not because he was ashamed of what he had done as a bad thing, but because he was afraid, if the Philistines knew it, they would be apprehensive of danger to themselves or their allies by harbouring him among them and would expel him from their coasts. It would be easy to conclude, If so he did, so will be his manner, and therefore he industriously conceals it from them, which, it seems, he could do by putting them all to the sword, for none of their neighbours would inform against him, nor perhaps would soon come to the knowledge of what was done, intelligence not being so readily communicated then as now. (2.) He hid it from Achish with an equivocation not at all becoming his character. Being asked which way he had made his sally, he answered, Against the south of Judah, v. 13. It was true he had invaded those countries that lay south of Judah, but he made Achish believe he had invaded those that lay south in Judah, the Ziphites for example, that had once and again betrayed him; so Achish understood him, and thence inferred that he had made his people Israel to abhor him, and so riveted himself in the interest of Achish. The fidelity of Achish to him, his good opinion of him, and the confidence he put in him, aggravate his sin in deceiving him thus, which, with some other such instances, David seems penitently to reflect upon when he prays, Remove from me the way of lying.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 8–12. Public domain.
Copy as
BedeAD 735
Commentary on Samuel
And David and his men went up, etc. Upon the rock, Egypt sounds darkness. Therefore, the Church was growing through the steadfastness of Christ's disciples, and was rescuing souls from pagan rites, which, following the examples of not new but ancient men, had clung to earthly desires, with all going to the hardness of heart, and arriving as far as the dark land, covered with the gloom of death, the land of the misery of darkness, where the shadow of death, and no order, and eternal horror dwells.
Richard ChallonerAD 1781
Pillaged Gessuri: These probably were enemies of the people of God: and some, if not all of them, were of the number of those whom God had ordered to be destroyed: which justifies David's proceedings in their regard. Though it is to be observed here, that we are not under an obligation of justifying every thing that he did: for the scripture, in relating what was done, does not say that it was well done. And even such as are true servants of God, are not to be imitated in all they do.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 27:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.