TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Samuel 25 verses 2–11
Here begins the story of Nabal.
I. A short account of him, who and what he was (Sa1 25:2, Sa1 25:3), a man wee should never have heard of if there had not happened some communication between him and David. Observe, 1. His name: Nabal - a fool; so it signifies. It was a wonder that his parents would give him that name and an ill omen of what proved to be this character. Yet indeed we all of us deserve to be so called when we come into the world, for man is born like the wild ass's colt and foolishness is bound up in our hearts. 2. His family: He was of the house of Caleb, but was indeed of another spirit. He inherited Caleb's estate; for Maon and Carmel lay near Hebron, which was given to Caleb (Jos 15:54, Jos 15:55; Jos 14:14), but he was far from inheriting his virtues. He was a disgrace to his family, and then it was no honour to him. Degeneranti genus opprobrium - A Good extraction is a reproach to him who degenerates from it. The Septuagint, and some other ancient versions, read it appellatively, not, He was a Calebite, but He was a dogged man, of a currish disposition, surly and snappish, and always snarling. He was anthrōpos kunikos - a man that was a cynic. 3. His wealth: He was very great, that is, very rich (for riches make men look great in the eye of the world), otherwise, to one that takes his measures aright, he really looked very mean. Riches are common blessings, which God often gives to Nabals, to whom he gives neither wisdom nor grace. 4. His wife - Abigail, a woman of great understanding. Her name signifies, the joy of her father; yet he could not promise himself much joy of her when he married her to such a husband, enquiring more after his wealth than after his wisdom. Many a child is thrown away upon a great heap of the dirt of worldly wealth, married to that, and to nothing else that is desirable. Wisdom is good with an inheritance, but an inheritance is good for little without wisdom. Many an Abigail is tied to a Nabal; and if it be so, be her understanding, like Abigail's, ever so great, it will be little enough for her exercises. 5. His character. He had no sense either of honour or honesty; not of honour, for he was churlish, cross, and ill-humoured; not of honesty, for he was evil in his doings, hard and oppressive, and a man that cared not what fraud and violence he used in getting and saving, so he could but get and save. This is the character given of Nabal by him who knows what every man is.
II. David's humble request to him, that he would send him some victuals for himself and his men.
1.David, it seems, was in such distress that he would be glad to be beholden to him, and did in effect come a begging to his door. What little reason have we to value the wealth of this world when so great a churl as Nabal abounds and so great a saint as David suffers want! Once before we had David begging his bread, but then it was of Ahimelech the high priest, to whom one would not grudge to stoop. But to send a begging to Napal was what such a spirit as David had could not admit without some reluctancy; yet, if Providence bring him to these straits, he will not say that to beg he is ashamed. Yet see Psa 37:25.
2.He chose a good time to send to Nabal, when he had many hands employed about him in shearing his sheep, for whom he was to make a plentiful entertainment, so that good cheer was stirring. Had he sent at another time, Nabal would have pretended he had nothing to spare, but now he could not have that excuse. It was usual to make feasts at their sheep-shearings, as appears by Absalom's feast on that occasion (Sa2 13:24), for wool was one of the staple commodities of Canaan.
3.David ordered his men to deliver their message to him with a great deal of courtesy and respect: "Go to Nabal, and greet him in my name. Tell him I sent you to present my service to him, and to enquire how he does and his family," Sa1 25:5. He puts words in their mouths (Sa1 25:6): Thus shall you say to him that liveth; our translators add, in prosperity, as if those live indeed that live as Nabal did, with abundance of the wealth of this world about them; whereas, in truth, those that live in pleasure are dead while they live, Ti1 5:6. This was, methinks too high a compliment to pass upon Nabal, to call him the man that liveth. David knew better things, that in God's favour is life, not in the world's smiles; and by the rough answer he was well enough served, for this too smooth address to such a muck-worm. Yet his good wishes were very commendable. "Peace be to thee, all good both to soul and body. Peace be to thy house and to all that thou hast." Tell him I am a hearty well-wisher to his health and prosperity. He bids them call him his son David (Sa1 25:8), intimating that, for his age and estate, David honoured him as a father, and therefore hoped to receive some fatherly kindness from him.
4.He pleaded the kindness which Nabal's shepherds had received from David and his men; and one good turn requires another. He appeals to Nabal's own servants, and shows that when David's soldiers were quartered among Nabal's shepherds, (1.) They did not hurt them themselves, did them no injury, gave them no disturbance, were not a terror to them, nor took any of the lambs out of the flock. Yet, considering the character of David's men, men in distress, and debt, and discontented, and the scarcity of provisions in his camp, it was not without a great deal of care and good management that they were kept from plundering. (2.) They protected them from being hurt by others. David himself does but intimate this, for he would not boast of his good offices: Neither was there aught missing to them, Sa1 25:7. But Nabal's servants, to whom he appealed, went further (Sa1 25:16): They were a wall unto us, both by night and day. David's soldiers were a guard to Nabal's shepherds when the bands of the Philistines robbed the threshing-floors (Sa1 23:1) and would have robbed the sheep-folds. From those plunderers Nabal's flocks were protected by David's care, and therefore he says, Let us find favour in thy eyes. Those that have shown kindness may justly expect to receive kindness.
5.He was very modest in his request. Though David was anointed king, he insisted not upon royal dainties, but, "Give whatsoever comes to thy hand, and we will be thankful for it." Beggars must not be choosers. Those that deserved to have been served first will now be glad of what is left. They plead, We come in a good day, a festival, when not only the provision is more plentiful, but the heart and hand are usually more open and free than at other times, when much may be spared and yet not be missed. David demands not what he wanted as a debt, either by way of tribute as he was a king, or by way of contribution as he was a general, but asks it as a boon to a friend, that was his humble servant. David's servants delivered their message faithfully and very handsomely, not doubting but to go back well laden with provisions.
III. Nabal's churlish answer to this modest petition, Sa1 25:10, Sa1 25:11. One could not have imagined it possible that any man should be so very rude and ill-conditioned as Nabal was. David called himself his son, and asked bread and a fish, but, instead thereof, Nabal gave him a stone and a scorpion; not only denied him, but abused him. If he had not thought fit to send him any supplies for fear of Ahimelech's fate, who paid dearly for his kindness to David; yet he might have given a civil answer, and made the denial as modest as the request was. But, instead of that, he falls into a passion, as covetous men are apt to do when they are asked for any thing, thinking thus to cover one sin with another, and by abusing the poor to excuse themselves from relieving them. But God will not thus be mocked. 1. He speaks scornfully of David as an insignificant man, not worth taking notice of. The Philistines could say of him, This is David the king of the land, that slew his ten thousands (Sa1 21:11), yet Nabal his near neighbour, and one of the same tribe, affects not to know him, or not to know him to be a man of any merit or distinction: Who is David? And who is the son of Jesse? He could not be ignorant how much the country was obliged to David for his public services, but his narrow soul thinks not of paying any part of that debt, nor so much as of acknowledging it; he speaks of David as an inconsiderable man, obscure, and not to be regarded. Think it not strange if great men and great merits be thus disgraced. 2. He upbraids him with his present distress, and takes occasion from it to represent him as a bad man, that was fitter to be set in the stocks for a vagrant than to have any kindness shown him. How naturally does he speak the churlish clownish language of those that hate to give alms! There are many servants now-a-days (as if there had been none such in former days) that break every man from his master, suggesting that David was one of them himself ("He might have kept his place with his master Saul, and then he needed not have sent to me for provisions"), and also that he entertained and harboured those that were fugitives like himself. It would make one's blood rise to hear so great and good a man as David thus vilified and reproached by such a base churl as Nabal. But the vile person will speak villany, Isa 32:5-7. If men bring themselves into straits by their own folly, yet they are to be pitied and helped, and not trampled upon and starved. But David was reduced to this distress, not by any fault, no, nor any indiscretion, of his own, but purely by the good services he had done to his country and the honours which his God had put upon him; and yet he was represented as a fugitive and runagate. Let this help us to bear such reproaches and misrepresentations of us with patience and cheerfulness, and make us easy under them, that it has often been the lot of the excellent ones of the earth. Some of the best men that ever the world was blest with were counted as the off-scouring of all things, Co1 4:13. 3. He insists much upon the property he had in the provisions of his table, and will by no means admit any body to share in them. "It is my bread and my flesh, yes, and my water too (though usus communis aquarum - water is every one's property), and it is prepared for my shearers," priding himself in it that it was all his own; and who denied it? Who offered to dispute his title? But this, he thinks, will justify him in keeping it all to himself, and giving David none; for may he not do what he will with his own? Whereas we mistake if we think we are absolute lords of what we have and may do what we please with it. No, we are but stewards, and must use it as we are directed, remembering it is not our own, but his that entrusted us with it. Riches are ta allotria (Luk 16:12); they are another's, and we ought not to talk too much of their being our own.
I heard that your shepherds are shearing, etc. And the Lord spoke these things through his apostles to the chiefs of the Jews, "I heard that your disciples are teaching the people, who used the same pastures of sacred Scripture as we did. We were never troublesome to them, but behaved quietly toward everyone, and moreover preached the gentle yoke of humility and the light burden: nor did anything ever perish from their teaching or deeds: they were with us at all times in the recognition of circumcision, that is, where they, like us, acknowledged spiritual circumcision in the highest words of divine eloquence. It must be understood here that something could have perished from the substance of those who had been in Carmel without David; that is, the superfluous reading in many ways, not profitable for the salvation of the soul, of those who, reading the Scriptures, did not know how to understand Christ in the Scriptures. Ask, he says, some of the innocent and knowingly humble among your people of whom the kingdom of heaven is; and they will tell you that the grace of the Gospel is not contrary to the letter of the law, but in both Testaments the just live by faith.
Continue studying 1 Samuel 25:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
1 Samuel 25:7 captures David's strategic and respectful appeal to Nabal during the annual sheep-shearing festival, a time traditionally marked by generosity. As a fugitive leader operating in the wilderness with his company, David articulates the invaluable and blameless protection his men provided to Nabal's shepherds and flocks in Carmel. This verse establishes the moral and customary basis for David's expectation of provisions, highlighting his men's integrity and disciplined conduct, and setting the stage for Nabal's churlish refusal and the ensuing dramatic confrontation that tests David's character and reveals God's providential hand.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The passage employs several effective literary devices that enhance its meaning and dramatic impact. Contrast is subtly established, setting David's disciplined and honorable conduct against Nabal's churlishness and folly, which becomes starkly evident in the subsequent verses. David's words themselves function as a Rhetorical Appeal, meticulously constructed to remind Nabal of a past, uncompensated service, thereby aiming to evoke a sense of obligation and gratitude. The mention of "shearers" and the sheep-shearing festival serves as a potent Symbol of abundance, prosperity, and a culturally prescribed time for open-handed generosity, making Nabal's subsequent refusal an even more egregious and socially unacceptable act. Furthermore, the narrative employs Foreshadowing, as David's reasonable and respectful request, when met with Nabal's insult, directly precipitates the dramatic escalation of events, leading to David's near-vengeance and Abigail's providential intervention, signaling the unfolding of God's plan.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
This verse, while seemingly a straightforward request for provisions, is deeply embedded in the theological fabric of the Old Testament, particularly concerning themes of justice, righteous living, and God's providential care. David's appeal is rooted in the ancient Near Eastern understanding of covenant and reciprocity, where service rendered justly expects a return. It reflects a divine principle that those who sow good deeds should reap benefit, and that integrity, even in challenging circumstances, is honored by God. Nabal's failure to acknowledge David's blameless protection is not just a social gaffe but a profound moral failing, demonstrating a lack of wisdom, generosity, and even basic human decency that stands in stark contrast to God's character. The narrative implicitly teaches that God upholds the righteous and provides for His anointed, even when human channels fail, often through unexpected means or individuals.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The account of David and Nabal, with 1 Samuel 25:7 at its heart, provides profound and timeless lessons for contemporary believers. It challenges us to critically examine how we acknowledge, value, and reciprocate the contributions of others, particularly those who serve us without explicit payment or recognition. David's men, despite their precarious "outlaw" status, exhibited remarkable discipline and integrity, demonstrating that true character is defined by actions and moral conduct, not by social standing or perceived legality. This calls us to maintain our integrity and ethical standards even when circumstances are difficult, unfair, or when we are operating outside conventional structures. Furthermore, the principle of reciprocity embedded in this narrative reminds us of the interconnectedness of community and the vital importance of generosity and gratitude. Are we quick to recognize and reward good service, or do we, like Nabal, hoard our blessings and dismiss legitimate claims? This narrative encourages a posture of gratefulness, open-handedness, and a commitment to fostering healthy, reciprocal relationships, thereby reflecting the generous and just nature of God in our own lives.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was David's request to Nabal considered legitimate, and not a demand for tribute or extortion?
Answer: David's request was considered legitimate because it was deeply rooted in the ancient Near Eastern custom of reciprocity, particularly during festive occasions like sheep shearing. David's men had provided invaluable, uncompensated protection to Nabal's shepherds and flocks in the dangerous wilderness of Carmel (as explicitly stated in 1 Samuel 25:7), preventing potential losses from raiders, bandits, or wild animals. This was a significant and sustained service. During sheep shearing, landowners were culturally expected to show generosity and hospitality, especially to those who had rendered such beneficial service. David was not demanding tribute or extorting Nabal; he was appealing to a recognized social contract and the principle of a fair return for a valuable protective service. Nabal's subsequent refusal was therefore not just a discourtesy but a profound cultural insult and a breach of expected social conduct, demonstrating his foolishness and wickedness.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
While 1 Samuel 25:7 speaks of David's earthly claim for provisions based on his men's blameless protection, it resonates with profound Christ-centered fulfillment. Jesus is the ultimate Good Shepherd, who not only protects His flock from spiritual harm and loss but perfectly lays down His life for them (John 10:11). Unlike David's men who merely "hurt them not" and ensured "nought missing," Christ perfectly preserves His own, ensuring that none whom the Father has given Him will be lost (John 6:39) and that He will "lose nothing, but raise it up at the last day" (John 6:39). His integrity and blamelessness far surpass that of David's men, for He "committed no sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth" (1 Peter 2:22), living a life of perfect obedience. Furthermore, the principle of reciprocity finds its ultimate, divine expression in Christ's kingdom: He has given us everything—His life, His Spirit, eternal salvation—and He expects us to bear fruit in return, not out of obligation, but out of love and gratitude for His immeasurable grace (John 15:16). The "harvest" of Nabal's sheep shearing, which should have led to generosity, points to the spiritual harvest that Christ expects from His people, a harvest of righteousness and good works that flow from His protective and provisionary care, demonstrating the abundance of His grace and the faithfulness of His flock.