1 Corinthians 10:25

Translation
King James Version
Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, that eat, asking no question for conscience sake:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Whatsoever G3956 is sold G4453 in G1722 the shambles G3111, that eat G2068, asking G350 no G3367 question G350 for G1223 conscience G4893 sake G1223:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Eat whatever is sold in the meat market without raising questions of conscience,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Eat anything sold in the meat market without raising questions of conscience,
Ask
American Standard Version
Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, eat, asking no question for conscience’ sake;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Whatever is sold in the butcher shop, eat, asking no question for the sake of conscience,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Whatsoeuer is solde in the shambles, eate ye, and aske no question for conscience sake.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Whatever in the meat-market is sold eat ye, not inquiring, because of the conscience,
Ask
See also
1 Corinthians 8:71 Timothy 4:4Titus 1:15Romans 14:14Acts 10:15Romans 13:51 Corinthians 10:27
See on the biblical-era map
Corinthians
Corinthians View full PDF
Epistles Overview
Epistles Overview View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 28,593 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

First Corinthians 10:25 provides practical guidance regarding Christian liberty, specifically concerning the consumption of meat sold in public markets that may have originated from pagan sacrifices. Paul instructs believers to eat whatever is available without scrupulous inquiry into its origin, emphasizing that such investigation is unnecessary and could potentially trouble one's own conscience or that of others. This directive underscores the principle that believers are free in Christ and should not create unnecessary burdens or divisions over matters indifferent to faith, provided their actions do not cause a brother or sister to stumble.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within a larger, intricate discussion by the Apostle Paul concerning the relationship between Christian liberty, conscience, and communal responsibility, spanning 1 Corinthians 8-10. Paul begins in 1 Corinthians 8 by establishing that while idols are "nothing" (1 Corinthians 8:4), knowledge must be tempered by love, lest it cause a "weak brother" to stumble (1 Corinthians 8:9-13). He then uses his own example of foregoing rights for the sake of the gospel in 1 Corinthians 9, before warning against idolatry and presumption in 1 Corinthians 10:1-22. Verses 1 Corinthians 10:23-33 then offer specific applications, distinguishing between eating meat in the market, at a pagan's home, and the overarching principle of doing all things for God's glory and the good of others, leading into the summary statement of 1 Corinthians 10:31.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The city of Corinth was a bustling, cosmopolitan hub in the Roman Empire, replete with numerous pagan temples and active cults. A common practice was for animals sacrificed to idols to have their edible portions sold in public meat markets, known as "shambles" or macella. This meat was often cheaper and readily available. For early Christians, many of whom were converts from paganism, the question of whether it was permissible to eat such meat was a significant point of contention. Some, understanding that idols were not real gods, felt free to eat it, while others, perhaps with recent memories of pagan worship, felt eating such meat was a compromise or even participation in idolatry. The cultural context also involved social dining, where Christians might be invited to meals in the homes of non-believers where meat from sacrifices could be served. Paul's instructions provided practical guidance for navigating these complex social and religious interactions without compromising faith or causing division.
  • Key Themes: This verse, and the broader passage, contributes significantly to several key themes within 1 Corinthians. Foremost is the theme of Christian liberty, emphasizing the freedom believers have in Christ from external regulations, particularly those related to food, as "all things are lawful" (1 Corinthians 10:23). However, this liberty is always balanced by the theme of love and consideration for others, especially the "weaker brother" whose conscience might be troubled (1 Corinthians 8:9). The concept of conscience itself is central, highlighting the internal moral compass that guides believers' actions. Finally, the overarching theme of glorifying God in all things (1 Corinthians 10:31) serves as the ultimate principle governing the exercise of Christian freedom, ensuring that personal choices contribute to the spiritual well-being of the community and the honor of God.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • shambles (Greek, mákellon', G3111): This term refers to a butcher's stall, meat market, or provision-shop. It denotes a public place where meat, including that which might have been part of pagan sacrifices, was sold to the general populace. Paul's use of this specific term indicates that his instruction applies to everyday commercial transactions, distinguishing it from eating meat knowingly offered to idols in a temple setting or at a pagan feast.
  • asking (Greek, anakrínō', G350): Properly, this word means "to scrutinize," "investigate," "interrogate," or "determine." In this context, it refers to making a deliberate inquiry or examination into the origin of the meat. Paul's prohibition against "asking no question" implies that believers should not proactively seek out information that might trouble their conscience or lead to unnecessary scrupulosity about indifferent matters.
  • conscience (Greek, syneídēsis', G4893): This term denotes "co-perception," or moral consciousness. It refers to the inner faculty that judges one's actions and motives, discerning right from wrong. Paul's emphasis on "conscience sake" highlights that the primary concern is not the inherent nature of the meat (which is morally neutral), but the internal state of the believer and the potential for their own conscience or that of another to be defiled or troubled by the knowledge of the meat's origin.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Whatsoever is sold in the shambles": This phrase establishes the specific context for Paul's instruction: meat purchased in a public market. It implies a setting where the origin of the meat (whether it was part of a pagan sacrifice or not) is generally unknown to the buyer, or at least not the primary concern of the vendor. The focus is on common, everyday transactions.
  • "that eat": This is a direct command, granting permission and encouraging believers to consume such meat. It reinforces the idea that the meat itself is not defiled by its potential association with idolatry, aligning with the New Testament understanding that "food does not commend us to God" (1 Corinthians 8:8).
  • "asking no question for conscience sake": This is the crucial qualification. Believers are not to initiate an inquiry into the meat's background. The phrase "for conscience sake" signifies that the reason for this avoidance of inquiry is to prevent troubling one's own conscience with unnecessary scruples or, by extension, to avoid raising issues that might trouble the conscience of a weaker brother who might overhear such questioning. It promotes a practical, unburdened approach to matters of Christian liberty.

Literary Devices

Paul employs Didacticism in this verse, providing direct and practical instruction to the Corinthian believers on how to navigate a specific ethical dilemma. The imperative verbs "eat" and "asking no question" demonstrate his authoritative teaching role. There is also an element of Pragmatism, as Paul offers a sensible, real-world solution to a common issue, prioritizing peace and the spiritual well-being of the community over rigid legalism or unnecessary scrupulosity. The phrase "for conscience sake" functions as a form of Etiology, explaining the underlying reason or principle behind the command, linking the action directly to an internal moral state.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This verse powerfully articulates the New Testament principle of Christian liberty, asserting that for the believer, all creation is good and usable, sanctified by God's word and prayer, and not inherently defiled by human rituals or associations. It underscores that true defilement comes not from external things but from the heart. However, this freedom is not absolute; it is always to be exercised within the bounds of love for one's neighbor and the pursuit of God's glory. The instruction to avoid unnecessary inquiry highlights a profound trust in God's provision and a rejection of legalistic burdens, while simultaneously maintaining a sensitivity to the consciences of others, ensuring that liberty does not become a stumbling block.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

First Corinthians 10:25 offers profound guidance for navigating ethical dilemmas in contemporary life, particularly where personal convictions intersect with communal harmony. It challenges believers to cultivate a robust understanding of Christian freedom, recognizing that many matters are morally neutral and do not inherently defile. The core instruction to "ask no question" encourages a posture of trust and simplicity, rather than a meticulous, anxious investigation into every detail of a product's origin or association, especially when such inquiry would lead to unnecessary scrupulosity for oneself or others. This does not preclude responsible ethical consumerism where clear moral principles are at stake (e.g., supporting injustice), but it cautions against creating legalistic burdens where God has granted freedom. Ultimately, the verse calls us to prioritize love, unity, and the clear conscience of both ourselves and our fellow believers, ensuring that our exercise of liberty edifies the body of Christ and glorifies God, rather than becoming a source of division or unnecessary guilt.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life do I tend to "ask questions" that create unnecessary burdens for my conscience or the consciences of others?
  • How can I better exercise my Christian liberty in a way that is both free and loving, avoiding both legalism and causing others to stumble?
  • What is the balance between being a discerning consumer and avoiding scrupulous anxiety over morally neutral matters?

FAQ

Does this verse mean I shouldn't care about ethical sourcing or production practices today?

Answer: No, this verse primarily addresses the issue of meat potentially offered to idols, which Paul declares to be "nothing" in itself (1 Corinthians 8:4). It teaches that the spiritual defilement associated with pagan rituals does not transfer to the food itself. Modern ethical sourcing concerns (e.g., fair labor practices, environmental impact, animal cruelty) fall under a different category of moral consideration, often related to justice, stewardship, and compassion. While 1 Corinthians 10:25 encourages freedom from unnecessary scrupulosity, it does not negate the broader biblical call to act justly and lovingly in all areas of life, including our economic choices. The principle remains that while "all things are lawful," not all things are "profitable" or "edifying" (1 Corinthians 10:23).

What if I know for certain that the meat was sacrificed to an idol, or if someone tells me it was?

Answer: Paul addresses this specific scenario in the very next verse, 1 Corinthians 10:28. If someone explicitly informs you that the meat was offered to idols, you should refrain from eating it, not for your own conscience (since you know an idol is nothing), but "for the sake of the one who informed you, and for conscience' sake." This demonstrates the paramount importance of love and not causing a weaker brother or sister to stumble, even if it means foregoing a personal liberty. The principle shifts from your personal freedom to the spiritual well-being of your neighbor.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

First Corinthians 10:25, while a practical instruction on food, finds its ultimate fulfillment and meaning in Christ. Jesus, through His perfect life, atoning death, and resurrection, abolished the Old Covenant's ceremonial food laws, declaring all foods clean (Mark 7:19). His sacrifice on the cross rendered pagan deities truly "nothing," stripping them of any power to defile creation, thus liberating believers from the fear of ritual impurity associated with such practices. Christ's example of self-emptying love and willingness to forgo His own rights for the sake of others (Philippians 2:5-8) provides the foundational principle for Paul's teaching on Christian liberty: our freedom is always to be exercised in love, considering the conscience and spiritual well-being of our brothers and sisters. Ultimately, the freedom to eat "whatsoever is sold in the shambles" without question is a manifestation of the liberty secured by Christ, reminding us that true worship and purity come from a heart transformed by Him, rather than from adherence to external regulations or anxious scrupulosity, as He taught in Matthew 15:11.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Corinthians 10 verses 23–33

In this passage the apostle shows in what instances, notwithstanding, Christians might lawfully eat what had been sacrificed to idols. They must not eat it out of religious respect to the idol, nor go into his temple, and hold a feast there, upon what they knew was an idol-sacrifice; nor perhaps out of the temple, if they knew it was a feast held upon a sacrifice, but there were cases wherein they might without sin eat what had been offered. Some such the apostle here enumerates. - But,

I. He gives a caution against abusing our liberty in lawful things. That may be lawful which is not expedient, which will not edify. A Christian must not barely consider what is lawful, but what is expedient, and for the use of edification. A private Christian should do so even in his private conduct. He must not seek his own only, but his neighbour's wealth. He must be concerned not to hurt his neighbour, nay, he must be concerned to promote his welfare; and must consider how to act so that he may help others, and not hinder them in their holiness, comfort, or salvation. Those who allow themselves in every thing not plainly sinful in itself will often run into what is evil by accident, and do much mischief to others. Every thing lawful in itself to be done is not therefore lawfully done. Circumstances may make that a sin which in itself is none. These must be weighed, and the expediency of an action, and its tendency to edification, must be considered before it be done. Note, The welfare of others, as well as our own convenience, must be consulted in many things we do, if we would do them well.

II. He tells them that what was sold in the shambles they might eat without asking questions. The priest's share of heathen sacrifices was thus frequently offered for sale, after it had been offered in the temple. Now the apostle tells them they need not be so scrupulous as to ask the butcher in the market whether the meat he sold had been offered to an idol? It was there sold as common food, and as such might be bought and used; for the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof (Co1 10:26), and the fruit and products of the earth were designed by him, the great proprietor, for the use and subsistence of mankind, and more especially of his own children and servants. Every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving; for it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer, Ti1 4:4, Ti1 4:5. To the pure all things are pure, Tit 1:15. Note, Though it is sinful to use any food in an idolatrous manner, it is no sin, after such abuse, to apply it, in a holy manner, to its common use.

III. He adds that if they were invited by any heathen acquaintances to a feast, they might go, and eat what was set before them, without asking questions (Co1 10:27), nay, though they knew things sacrificed to idols were served up at such entertainments, as well as sold in the shambles. Note, The apostle does not prohibit their going to a feast upon the invitation of those that believed not. There is a civility owing even to infidels and heathens. Christianity does by no means bind us up from the common offices of humanity, nor allow us an uncourteous behaviour to any of our own kind, however they may differ from us in religious sentiments or practices. And when Christians were invited to feast with infidels they were not to ask needless questions about the food set before them, but eat without scruple. Needless enquiries might perplex their minds and consciences, for which reason they were to be avoided. Any thing fit to be eaten, that was set before them at a common entertainment, they might lawfully eat. And why then should they scrupulously enquire whether what was set before them had been sacrificed? It is to be understood of civil feasting, not religious; for the latter among the heathens was feasting upon their sacrifices, which he had condemned before as a participation in their idolatrous worship. At a common feast they might expect common food; and they needed not to move scruples in their own minds whether what was set before them was otherwise or no. Note, Though Christians should be very careful to know and understand their duty, yet they should not, by needless enquiries, perplex themselves.

IV. Yet, even at such an entertainment, he adds, if any should say it was a thing that had been offered to idols, they should refrain: Eat not, for his sake that showed it, and for conscience' sake. Whether it were the master of the feast or any of the guests, whether it were spoken in the hearing of all or whispered in the ear, they should refrain for his sake who suggested this to them, whether he were an infidel or an infirm Christian; and for conscience' sake, out of regard to conscience, that they might show a regard to it in themselves, and keep up a regard to it in others. This he backs with the same reason as the former: For the earth is the Lord's. There is food enough provided by our common Lord, of which we maya eat without scruple. The same doctrine may be variously improved, as here: "The earth is the Lord's, therefore you may eat any thing without scruple that is set before you as common food; and yet, because the earth is the Lord's, eat nothing that will give offence, lay a stumbling-block before others, and encourage some in idolatry, or tempt others to eat when they are not clear in their own mind that it is lawful, and so sin, and wound their own consciences." Note, Christians should be very cautious of doing what may thus prejudice the consciences of others, and weaken their authority with them, which is by all means to be kept up.

V. He urges them to refrain where they will give offence, while yet he allows it lawful to eat what was et before them as common food, though it had been offered in sacrifice. "Another man's conscience is no measure to our conduct. What he thinks unlawful is not thereby made unlawful to me, but may be a matter of liberty still; and as long as I own God as a giver of my food, and render him thanks for it, it is very unjust to reproach me for using it." This must be understood abstracted from the scandal given by eating in the circumstance mentioned. Though some understand it to mean, "Why should I, by using the liberty I have, give occasion to those who are scandalized to speak evil of me?" According to that advice of the apostle (Rom 14:16), Let not your good be evil spoken of. Note, Christians should take care not to use their liberty to the hurt of others, nor their own reproach.

VI. The apostle takes occasion from this discourse to lay down a rule for Christians' conduct, and apply it to this particular case (Co1 10:31, Co1 10:32), namely, that in eating and drinking, and in all we do, we should aim at the glory of God, at pleasing and honouring him. This is the fundamental principle of practical godliness. The great end of all practical religion must direct us where particular and express rules are wanting. Nothing must be done against the glory of God, and the good of our neighbours, connected with it. Nay, the tendency of our behaviour to the common good, and the credit of our holy religion, should give direction to it. And therefore nothing should be done by us to offend any, whether Jew, or Gentile, or the church, Co1 10:32. The Jews should not be unnecessarily grieved nor prejudiced, who have such an abhorrence of idols that they reckon every thing offered to them thereby defiled, and that it will pollute and render culpable all who partake of it; nor should heathens be countenanced in their idolatry by any behaviour of ours, which they may construe as homage or honour done to their idols; nor young converts from Gentilism take any encouragement from our conduct to retain any veneration for the heathen gods and worship, which they have renounced: nor should we do any thing that may be a means to pervert any members of the church from their Christian profession or practice. Our own humour and appetite must not determine our practice, but the honour of God and the good and edification of the church. We should not so much consult our own pleasure and interest as the advancement of the kingdom of God among men. Note, A Christian should be a man devoted to God, and of a public spirit.

VII. He presses all upon them by his own example: Even as I please all men (or study to do it) in all things (that I lawfully can), not seeking my own profit, but that of many, that they may be saved, Co1 10:33. Note, A preacher may press his advice home with boldness and authority when he can enforce it with his own example. He is most likely to promote a public spirit in others who can give evidence of it in himself. And it is highly commendable in a minister to neglect his own advantage that he may promote the salvation of his hearers. This shows that he has a spirit suitable to his function. It is a station for public usefulness, and can never be faithfully discharged by a man of a narrow spirit and selfish principles.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 23–33. Public domain.
Copy as
Clement of AlexandriaAD 215
The Instructor Book 2
Wherefore daintiness is to be shunned, and we are to partake of few and necessary things. "And if one of the unbelievers call us to a feast, and we determine to go" (for it is a good thing not to mix with the dissolute), the apostle bids us "eat what is set before us, asking no questions for conscience sake." Similarly he has enjoined to purchase "what is sold in the shambles" without curious questioning.
TertullianAD 220
On Fasting
Xerophagies, however, (they consider) the novel name of a studied duty, and very much akin to heathenish superstition, like the abstemious rigours which purify an Apis, an Isis, and a Magna Mater, by a restriction laid upon certain kinds of food; whereas faith, free in Christ, owes no abstinence from particular meats to the Jewish Law even, admitted as it has been by the apostle once for all to the whole range of the meat-market -(the apostle, I say), that detester of such as, in like manner as they prohibit marrying, so bid us abstain from meats created by God.
TertullianAD 220
Against Marcion Book V
A great argument for another god is the permission to eat of all kinds of meats, contrary to the law. Just as if we did not ourselves allow that the burdensome ordinances of the law were abrogated-but by Him who imposed them, who also promised the new condition of things.
NovatianAD 258
JEWISH FOODS 5.6
Accordingly, it is evident that all these foods enjoy again the blessings they received at their creation, now that the law has ended.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on 1 Corinthians 25
Having said that "they could not drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of the devils," and having once for all led them away from those tables, by Jewish examples, by human reasonings, by the tremendous Mysteries, by the rites solemnized among the idols; and having filled them with great fear; that he might not by this fear drive again to another extreme, and they be forced, exercising a greater scrupulosity than was necessary, to feel alarm, lest possibly even without their knowledge there might come in some such thing either from the market or from some other quarter; to release them from this strait, he saith, "Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, eat, asking no question." "For," saith he, "if thou eat in ignorance and not knowingly, thou art not subject to the punishment: it being thenceforth a matter not of greediness, but of ignorance."

Nor doth he free the man only from this anxiety, but also from another, establishing them in thorough security and liberty. For he cloth not even suffer them to "question;" i.e., to search and enquire, whether it be an idol-sacrifice or no such thing; but simply to eat every thing which comes from the market, not even acquainting one's self with so much as this, what it is that is act before us. So that even he that eateth, if in ignorance, may be rid of anxiety. For such is the nature of those things which are not in their essence evil, but through the man's intention make him unclean. Wherefore he saith, "asking no question."
Severian of GabalaAD 425
PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
The conscience referred to here is not the conscience of the one who knows that idols do not exist but the conscience of the one who sees somebody else buying food which has been sacrificed to idols and thinks that it is wrong for that reason.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Corinthians 10:25 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.