Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Heber begat Japhlet, and Shomer, and Hotham, and Shua their sister.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Heber H2268 begat H3205 Japhlet H3310, and Shomer H7763, and Hotham H2369, and Shua H7774 their sister H269.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Hever fathered Yaflet, Shomer, Hotam and their sister Shua.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Heber was the father of Japhlet, Shomer, and Hotham, and of their sister Shua.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Heber begat Japhlet, and Shomer, and Hotham, and Shua their sister.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Heber became the father of Japhlet, and Shomer, and Hotham, and Shua their sister.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Heber begate Iaphlet, and Shomer, and Hotham, and Shuah their sister.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Heber begat Japhlet, and Shomer, and Hotham, and Shua their sister.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,568 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 7:32 is a concise yet significant genealogical entry within the tribe of Asher, meticulously recording the descendants of Heber: Japhlet, Shomer, Hotham, and their sister Shua. This verse, embedded within the extensive lineage records of 1 Chronicles, serves as a crucial thread in re-establishing Israel's post-exilic identity, affirming tribal claims to land and heritage, and underscoring God's faithful preservation of His covenant people through generations, even down to individual family units.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 7:32 is situated within the expansive genealogical records that dominate the first nine chapters of 1 Chronicles. Specifically, chapter 7 details the genealogies of Issachar, Benjamin, Naphtali, Manasseh, Ephraim, and Asher. These lists are far from mere dry records; they are foundational documents for the returning exiles, vital for re-establishing their national and religious identity after the Babylonian captivity. The mention of Heber's children, including a daughter, is part of a detailed accounting of the tribe of Asher, which highlights the Chronicler's meticulous work in tracing the continuity of Israel's families and their rightful place within the twelve tribes. This verse, like others in these chapters, acts as a building block in demonstrating the unbroken lineage from Adam to the post-exilic community, providing a profound sense of historical continuity and divine purpose. The Chronicler's emphasis on comprehensive genealogies underscores the importance of legitimate descent for temple service, land inheritance, and national identity in the restored community.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was likely compiled during or shortly after the Babylonian exile, a period of profound disruption and identity crisis for the Jewish people. Having lost their land, temple, and monarchy, the returning exiles desperately needed to re-anchor themselves in their heritage and understand their place in God's ongoing plan. Genealogies were critically important in ancient Israelite society for several reasons: they established tribal membership, which was crucial for land inheritance (as seen in the detailed land allotments in Numbers 26:52-56); they validated claims to priestly and Levitical service in the rebuilt temple (a concern explicitly addressed in Ezra 2:61-63); and they confirmed one's place within God's covenant people. The meticulous record-keeping, even of seemingly minor family lines like Heber's, underscores the cultural importance placed on ancestry and continuity, ensuring that the post-exilic community understood their roots and their enduring connection to the promises made to Abraham and David.
  • Key Themes: This brief verse contributes to several overarching themes in 1 Chronicles and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates God's continuity and preservation of His people. Despite exile, dispersion, and national trauma, God remained faithful to His covenant, ensuring the survival and re-establishment of the Israelite tribes. Secondly, it speaks to divine order and meticulous record-keeping. The inclusion of specific names, even those without prominent narratives, suggests that God's sovereignty extends to every individual and every detail of history, orchestrating the unfolding of His plan with precision. This divine attention to detail underscores the truth that every person has a place in God's grand design, however seemingly small, a theme echoed in the broader biblical emphasis on God's intimate knowledge of each individual (e.g., Psalm 139:13-16). Finally, the specific mention of "Shua their sister" subtly highlights the value of every individual, including women, within God's meticulously preserved lineage. While genealogies are often male-centric, the occasional inclusion of a female name signifies her unique importance or role within that specific family unit, perhaps related to inheritance or the continuation of a specific family line, as seen in the case of the daughters of Zelophehad in Numbers 27:1-11).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Heber (Hebrew, Cheber', H2268): The name "Heber" is derived from a root meaning "community" or "association." While the genealogical lists primarily serve to establish lineage, the inherent meaning of names can sometimes offer subtle layers of significance. In this context, Heber, as the patriarch of this specific family line within Asher, represents a foundational member of the community. His name subtly reinforces the idea of the Israelite people as a collective, a community bound together by shared ancestry and covenant, meticulously preserved by God through generations.
  • begat (Hebrew, yâlad', H3205): This verb is the standard term used throughout biblical genealogies to denote the act of fathering or giving birth. While simple in its literal meaning of "to bear young" or "to beget," its repeated use in these lists carries profound theological weight. It signifies continuity, the unbroken chain of generations, and the faithful transmission of life and heritage. In the context of Israel's genealogies, yalad underscores God's active role in preserving the lineage of His chosen people, ensuring the fulfillment of His covenant promises through successive generations. It is a testament to divine faithfulness in the face of human transience and historical upheaval.
  • sister (Hebrew, ʼâchôwth', H269): The inclusion of "Shua their sister" is noteworthy because female names are less frequently recorded in these male-dominated genealogical lists. While the primary purpose of genealogies was often to establish male lines for inheritance and tribal identity, the specific mention of a sister indicates her particular significance within this family unit. This could be due to her being an heiress if there were no male heirs (as seen in the case of the daughters of Zelophehad in Numbers 27:1-11), or simply a recognition of her unique place and contribution to the family's identity and continuity. It subtly broadens the scope of divine attention beyond just male lineage, affirming the value of all individuals within God's comprehensive plan.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Heber begat Japhlet, and Shomer, and Hotham": This clause follows the typical genealogical formula found throughout Chronicles and other biblical books. It establishes Heber as the patriarch and lists his male offspring. This formulaic presentation emphasizes the orderly progression of generations, vital for establishing tribal identity, validating land claims, and ensuring the continuity of the covenant people for the returning exiles. It grounds the current generation in a traceable past, connecting them to the covenant promises made to their forefathers and reinforcing their legitimate place within the restored community.
  • "and Shua their sister": The addition of Shua, the sister, to the list of male children is a significant detail that breaks the usual pattern of male-centric genealogies. In a patriarchal society where genealogies primarily focused on male lines for inheritance and tribal continuity, the explicit mention of a daughter suggests her particular importance within this family unit. This could imply her role in carrying on the family name or property, especially if there were no male heirs to inherit, or simply highlights the Chronicler's meticulousness in recording all significant members of the lineage. This detail affirms the value of each individual within God's comprehensive and divinely ordered plan for His people.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 7:32, and indeed throughout the opening chapters of Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is not merely a list but a structured literary form that serves profound theological and historical purposes. It functions as a foundational narrative, establishing the identity, continuity, and legitimacy of the Israelite people, particularly for the post-exilic community. Through the meticulous listing of "begats," the Chronicler employs Repetition to create a rhythmic, authoritative cadence, reinforcing the unbroken chain of generations and the reliability of the historical record. This repetition instills a sense of divine order and the faithful unfolding of God's plan. The specific Inclusion of "Shua their sister" can also be seen as a subtle literary device, breaking the typical male-centric pattern to draw attention to a particular individual. This deliberate mention highlights her unique significance within her family's lineage or for the broader tribal record, underscoring the Chronicler's intent to present a comprehensive and divinely ordered history that values every member of the covenant community.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 7:32, though a single line in a vast genealogy, profoundly connects to the overarching biblical theme of God's unwavering faithfulness and meticulous sovereignty over history. It reminds us that God's plans are not abstract but unfold through real people, real families, and real historical lines. Every individual, even those briefly mentioned, plays a part in God's grand narrative of redemption. The preservation of these lineages, particularly after the trauma of exile, serves as a powerful testament to God's commitment to His covenant people and His promise to maintain a remnant. It lays the groundwork for the ultimate fulfillment of His promises through the lineage of David, culminating in the Messiah. This verse subtly teaches that God's care extends to the smallest details of human existence, ensuring the continuity necessary for His redemptive purposes to be realized.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While a list of names might seem distant to the modern reader, 1 Chronicles 7:32 offers profound spiritual lessons. It invites us to consider the meticulous care God exercises over every detail of His creation and His redemptive plan. Just as He knew and recorded Heber's children, including Shua, He knows and cares for every individual life, even those who may feel insignificant or overlooked in the grand scheme of things. This verse encourages us to appreciate our own heritage, recognizing that our lives are part of a larger story, often shaped by the faith and choices of those who came before us. It challenges us to live faithfully, knowing that our "small" contributions can contribute to God's unfolding purposes across generations. Ultimately, it reminds us that we are not random accidents but are known, valued, and purposed by a God who orchestrates history with infinite precision and unwavering love, inviting us to find our place within His grand narrative.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulousness of biblical genealogies, like 1 Chronicles 7:32, challenge or affirm your understanding of God's character and His involvement in human history?
  • In what ways can recognizing your own "lineage" (whether biological, spiritual, or communal) provide a deeper sense of identity and purpose?
  • How might the inclusion of "Shua their sister" encourage you to recognize the value and significance of individuals who might otherwise be overlooked or marginalized in various contexts?
  • What does this seemingly "minor" verse teach us about God's faithfulness to His promises, even when they seem to unfold slowly or through seemingly ordinary people?

FAQ

Why are these genealogies so extensive and seemingly mundane?

Answer: These extensive genealogies, including 1 Chronicles 7:32, were far from mundane for their original audience. They served several critical purposes for the returning exiles. Firstly, they re-established national and tribal identity after the Babylonian captivity, helping people understand their place within the twelve tribes of Israel. Secondly, they were crucial for land claims, as inheritance was tied to tribal and family lineage (e.g., Numbers 26:52-56). Thirdly, they validated priestly and Levitical lines for service in the rebuilt temple, ensuring only those with legitimate heritage could perform sacred duties (as seen in Nehemiah 7:64). Finally, on a profound theological level, they demonstrated God's faithfulness in preserving His covenant people and the lineage through which the Messiah would eventually come, ensuring continuity despite historical upheaval.

Why is Shua, a sister, specifically mentioned in a genealogy that primarily lists male descendants?

Answer: The mention of "Shua their sister" is indeed notable because biblical genealogies typically focus on male lines for the purpose of tracing inheritance, tribal affiliation, and the continuation of the family name. Her specific inclusion suggests a particular significance. This could be because she was an heiress in the absence of male heirs, a practice established for the daughters of Zelophehad in Numbers 27:1-11, ensuring family property remained within the tribe. Alternatively, her mention might simply reflect the Chronicler's meticulousness in recording all significant members of a family unit, or perhaps she played a unique role in the family's history or the continuation of a specific sub-lineage within the tribe of Asher. It highlights that even in male-dominated records, God's attention extends to every individual, affirming their value within His divine plan and the unfolding of His redemptive purposes.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 7:32 appears to be a simple record of lineage within the tribe of Asher, its true Christ-centered fulfillment lies in its contribution to the broader biblical narrative of God's meticulous preservation of a chosen people, ultimately leading to the Messiah. These seemingly dry genealogies, spanning from Adam to the post-exilic community, serve as the historical backbone demonstrating God's unwavering commitment to His covenant promises. Every "begat" is a divine act of faithfulness, ensuring the continuity of the human family from which the "seed of the woman" would come, as first prophesied in Genesis 3:15. The meticulous record-keeping, even of seemingly minor figures like Heber and his children, underscores God's sovereign control over history, guiding every generation towards the ultimate heir. This divine precision culminates in the New Testament genealogies of Jesus Christ, as recorded in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38, which meticulously trace His lineage through Abraham and David, fulfilling the ancient prophecies. Thus, 1 Chronicles 7:32, though not directly mentioning Christ, is a vital thread in the vast tapestry of God's redemptive plan, demonstrating the divine faithfulness that ensured the arrival of the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, the very fulfillment of all God's promises to His people.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 7 verses 20–40

We have here an account,

I. Of the tribe of Ephraim. Great things we read of that tribe when it came to maturity. Here we have an account of the disasters of its infancy, while it was in Egypt as it should seem; for Ephraim himself was alive when those things were done, which yet is hard to imagine if it were, as is here computed, seven generations off. Therefore I am apt to think that either it was another Ephraim or that those who were slain were the immediate sons of that Ephraim that was the son of Joseph. In this passage, which is related here only, we have, 1. The great breach that was made upon the family of Ephraim. The men of Gath, Philistines, giants, slew many of the sons of that family, because they came down to take away their cattle, Ch1 7:21. It is uncertain who were the aggressors here. Some make the men of Gath the aggressors, men born in the land of Egypt, but now resident in Gath, supposing that they came down into the land of Goshen, to drive away the Ephraimites' cattle, and slew the owners, because they stood up in the defence of them. Many a man's life has been exposed and betrayed by his wealth; so far is it from being a strong city. Others think that the Ephraimites made a descent upon the men of Gath to plunder them, presuming that the time had come when they should be put in possession of Canaan; but they paid dearly for their rashness and precipitation. Those that will not wait God's time cannot expect God's blessing. I rather think that the men of Gath came down upon the Ephraimites, because the Israelites in Egypt were shepherds, not soldiers, abounded in cattle of their own, and therefore were not likely to venture their lives for their neighbours' cattle: and the words may be read, The men of Gath slew them, for they came down to take away their cattle. Zabad the son of Ephraim, and Shuthelah, and Ezer, and Elead (his grandchildren), were, as Dr. Lightfoot thinks, the men that were slain. Jacob had foretold that the seed of Ephraim should become a multitude of nations (Gen 48:19), and yet that plant is thus nipped in the bud. God's providences often seem to contradict his promises; but, when they do so, they really magnify the promise, and make the performance of it, notwithstanding, so much more illustrious. The Ephraimites were the posterity of Joseph, and yet his power could not protect them, though some think he was yet living. The sword devours one as well as another. 2. The great grief which oppressed the father of the family hereupon: Ephraim mourned many days. Nothing brings the aged to the grave with more sorrow than their following the young that descend from them to the grave first, especially if in blood. It is often the burden of those that live to be old that they see those go before them of whom they said, These same shall comfort us. It was a brotherly friendly office which his brethren did, when they came to comfort him under this great affliction, to express their sympathy with him and concern for him, and to suggest that to him which would support and quiet him under this sad providence. Probably they reminded him of the promise of increase which Jacob had blessed him when he laid his right hand upon his head. Although his house was not so with God as he hoped, but a house of mourning, a shattered family, yet that promise was sure, Sa2 23:5. 3. The repair of this breach, in some measure, by addition of another son to his family in his old age (Ch1 7:23), like Seth, another seed instead of that of Abel whom Cain slew, Gen 4:25. When God thus restores comfort to his mourners, makes glad according to the days wherein he afflicted, setting the mercies over against the crosses, we ought therein to take notice of the kindness and tenderness of divine Providence; it is as if it repented God concerning his servants, Psa 90:13, Psa 90:15. Yet joy that a man was born into his family could not make him forget his grief; for he gives a melancholy name to his son, Beriah - in trouble, for he was born when the family was in mourning, when it went evil with his house. It is good to have in remembrance the affliction and the misery, the wormwood and the gall, that our souls may be humbled within us, Lam 3:19, Lam 3:20. What name more proper for man that is born of a woman than Beriah, because born into a troublesome world? It is added, as a further honour to the house of Ephraim, (1.) That a daughter of that tribe, Sherah by name, at the time of Israel's setting in Canaan, built some cities, either at her own charge or by her own care; one of them bore her name, Uzzen-sherah, Ch1 7:24. A virtuous woman may be as great an honour and blessing to a family as a mighty man. (2.) That a son of that tribe was employed in the conquest of Canaan, Joshua the son of Nun, Ch1 7:27. In this also the breach made on Ephraim's family was further repaired; and perhaps the resentment of this injury formerly done by the Canaanites to the Ephraimites might make him more vigorous in the war.

II. Of the tribe of Asher. Some men of note of that tribe are here named. Their militia was not numerous in comparison with some other tribes, only 26,000 men in all; but their princes were choice and mighty men of valour, chief of the princes (Ch1 7:40), and perhaps it was their wisdom that they coveted not to make their trained bands numerous, but rather to have a few, and those apt to the war and serviceable men.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 20–40. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 7:32 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.