Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Meraioth begat Amariah, and Amariah begat Ahitub,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Meraioth H4812 begat H3205 Amariah H568, and Amariah H568 begat H3205 Ahitub H285,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
M'rayot fathered Amaryah, Amaryah fathered Achituv,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Meraioth was the father of Amariah, Amariah was the father of Ahitub,
Ask
American Standard Version
Meraioth begat Amariah, and Amariah begat Ahitub,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Meraioth became the father of Amariah, and Amariah became the father of Ahitub,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Meraioth begate Amariah, and Amariah begate Ahitub,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Meraioth begat Amariah, and Amariah begat Ahitub,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 10,462 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 6:7 meticulously details a segment of the high priestly lineage, stating, "Meraioth begat Amariah, and Amariah begat Ahitub." This verse, part of an extensive genealogical record in Chronicles, underscores the divine order and continuity of the Aaronic priesthood, crucial for establishing legitimacy and affirming God's covenant faithfulness to His people, particularly for the post-exilic community rebuilding their identity and worship.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is embedded within 1 Chronicles 6, a lengthy and significant genealogical register devoted to the Levites and their various divisions, with particular emphasis on the priestly line descended from Aaron. Chapters 1-9 of 1 Chronicles are almost entirely dedicated to genealogies, serving as a foundational historical and theological introduction to the rest of the book. Within this framework, 1 Chronicles 6:1-15 meticulously traces the direct line of high priests from Aaron through the period of the First Temple, providing a divinely sanctioned succession. The seemingly simple "begat" formula, repeated throughout, is not merely a list of names but a deliberate theological statement affirming the unbroken chain of divine appointment and the stability of God's covenant promises, even through periods of national upheaval and exile.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was likely compiled and written after the Babylonian exile, addressing a community that had returned to Judah and was in the process of rebuilding their nation, their temple, and their identity. For these returned exiles, establishing legitimate ties to their past was paramount. Genealogies were not mere curiosities; they were vital documents for land claims, tribal identity, and, most critically, for affirming the legitimacy of the priesthood and temple worship. The precise recording of generations, including figures like Meraioth, Amariah, and Ahitub, ensured that only those with a divinely appointed, pure lineage could fulfill the sacred duties of the high priest. This meticulous record reinforced the continuity of God's covenant with His people through designated leadership, providing stability and assurance in a time of reconstruction. The establishment of the Aaronic priesthood is detailed in Exodus 28.
  • Key Themes: The meticulous recording of this lineage, including 1 Chronicles 6:7, contributes significantly to several major themes in Chronicles and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it highlights Divine Order and Succession, emphasizing that God's plans are precise and that sacred offices are not matters of human election but divine appointment passed down through established lines. Secondly, it underscores the Legitimacy of the Priesthood, providing undeniable proof for the post-exilic community that their high priestly line was indeed descended from Aaron, thus validating their right to perform the crucial temple duties central to Israel's spiritual life and atonement. Finally, it powerfully demonstrates God's Faithfulness to Covenant, showing how He preserved the necessary spiritual functions for His people across centuries, ensuring the continuity of worship and the means of reconciliation. This echoes the broader biblical emphasis on genealogy as a testament to divine promise and fulfillment, culminating in the lineage of the Messiah.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Begat (Hebrew, yâlad', H3205): This verb (H3205), frequently translated as "begat" or "fathered," is a primitive root meaning "to bear young" or, causatively, "to beget." Its repeated use in 1 Chronicles 6:7 and throughout the genealogical sections signifies direct, biological descent, establishing an unbroken and legitimate lineage. In the context of the high priesthood, yâlad emphasizes the divinely ordained succession, where the office was passed down through specific family lines, rather than being elected or appointed externally. It underscores the concept of inherited authority and the continuity of God's design for His chosen servants.
  • Meraioth (Hebrew, Mᵉrâyôwth', H4812): A name (H4812) meaning "rebellious" or "bitternesses," Meraioth is identified as the son of Zerahiah and father of Amariah within this priestly line. While its etymology is less central here, its inclusion serves as a specific, verifiable link in the chain, demonstrating the historical reality and meticulous record-keeping of the priestly succession. His presence validates the preceding and succeeding generations, ensuring the unbroken continuity of the lineage.
  • Ahitub (Hebrew, ʼĂchîyṭûwb', H285): Meaning "brother of goodness" (H285), Ahitub is a significant figure in the high priestly line, known as the father of Zadok, who served as high priest during the time of David and Solomon. His inclusion in 1 Chronicles 6:7 marks a crucial point in the lineage, connecting the earlier, more obscure figures to a well-known and pivotal high priest in Israel's history, further solidifying the legitimacy and historical depth of the Aaronic succession.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Meraioth begat Amariah": This clause establishes a direct paternal link, indicating that Amariah was the son of Meraioth. In the context of the high priestly genealogy, this is more than a simple family record; it is a statement of legitimate succession within the divinely appointed office. It confirms that Amariah's right to priestly service, and potentially the high priesthood, was inherited through this specific, recognized lineage.
  • "and Amariah begat Ahitub": This second clause continues the chain, identifying Ahitub as the son of Amariah. The repetition of the "begat" formula reinforces the unbroken continuity of the line. This meticulous tracing of descent was critical for the post-exilic community, providing an undeniable historical and theological foundation for the legitimacy of their current priesthood and, by extension, the validity of their worship practices and covenant relationship with God.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 6:7, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is not merely a list of names but a deliberate literary and theological construct. In Chronicles, genealogies serve to establish historical continuity from creation to the post-exilic community, reaffirming the identity of Israel as God's chosen people. For the priesthood, it specifically validates the legitimacy of the Aaronic line, which was crucial for the returned exiles. The repetitive use of the verb "begat" creates a sense of Rhythm and Pattern, emphasizing the unbroken chain of succession and the divine order underlying the priestly office. This Conciseness in presenting vital information allows for the swift enumeration of many generations while highlighting the essential relationship of descent. The entire passage functions as a Historical Anchor, grounding the present reality of the post-exilic community in a long, divinely ordained past, assuring them of their place within God's ongoing covenant plan.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 6:7, though a simple genealogical entry, carries profound theological weight. It speaks to God's meticulous nature and His commitment to order and covenant faithfulness. The preservation of this specific priestly lineage, even through tumultuous periods of Israelite history, demonstrates God's unwavering promise to maintain a means of access and atonement for His people. The high priesthood was central to Israel's worship and their relationship with Yahweh, serving as the mediator between God and humanity. This verse, by affirming the legitimacy of the line, underscores the divine provision for spiritual leadership and the continuity of sacred service, ensuring that the covenant relationship could be maintained. It is a testament to God's sovereign hand guiding history and fulfilling His purposes through chosen individuals and established institutions.

  • Exodus 29:9 - "And you shall put the turbans on them, and tie the sashes on them. And the priesthood shall be theirs by a perpetual statute. Thus you shall ordain Aaron and his sons."
  • Hebrews 7:11-14 - "If perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need would there have been for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, rather than one named according to the order of Aaron?"
  • Luke 3:23-38 - "Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli... the son of Adam, the son of God."

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While a simple genealogical entry, 1 Chronicles 6:7 offers profound insights for believers today. It reminds us that God is a God of order, precision, and faithfulness, caring about the seemingly mundane details because they serve a greater purpose in His overarching plan. Just as the Israelites valued their physical lineage as a testament to God's promises, we, as believers, can appreciate our spiritual heritage. We are part of a long line of faith, built upon the foundation of apostles and prophets, with Christ as the chief cornerstone, as illuminated in Ephesians 2:20. The continuity of the priestly succession ensured the ongoing worship and covenant relationship between God and His people. Similarly, God continues His work through generations of believers, calling individuals to specific roles within His kingdom to carry on His mission. This verse encourages us to value and uphold the spiritual legacies passed down through the church, recognizing our place in God's grand, unfolding narrative of redemption. It invites us to consider how our lives contribute to the ongoing story of God's faithfulness, building upon the foundation laid by those who came before us, and preparing a legacy for those who will follow.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does God's meticulous attention to detail, as seen in these genealogies, speak to His character and His involvement in human history?
  • What spiritual heritage have you received from those who came before you in faith, and how are you stewarding that legacy for future generations?
  • In what ways does understanding the continuity of God's plan, from ancient Israel to the present church, encourage you in your own walk of faith and sense of purpose?

FAQ

Why are these genealogies so important in the Bible, especially in Chronicles?

Answer: Genealogies in the Bible, particularly in Chronicles, serve multiple crucial functions. For the post-exilic community to whom Chronicles was addressed, they provided a vital link to their past, re-establishing their identity as God's chosen people. They affirmed the legitimacy of their institutions, especially the priesthood and the Davidic monarchy, which were foundational to their national and religious life. Genealogies also demonstrated God's faithfulness to His covenant promises, showing how He preserved specific lineages over centuries. They were historical records, tribal markers, and theological statements, all rolled into one, assuring the returned exiles of their place in God's ongoing plan.

What is the significance of the "begat" formula used repeatedly in this verse and throughout biblical genealogies?

Answer: The repeated "begat" (Hebrew: yalad) formula, as seen in 1 Chronicles 6:7, is more than a simple record of birth; it is a declaration of legitimate, direct lineage and succession. In the context of the high priesthood, it signifies that the authority and sacred office were passed down through a divinely appointed, unbroken chain of generations. This was critical for establishing the purity and legitimacy of those serving in the temple, ensuring that only those truly called and descended from Aaron could perform the sacred duties. It emphasizes divine order and the continuity of God's plan through specific, chosen lines.

How does this verse relate to the broader purpose of 1 Chronicles?

Answer: 1 Chronicles 6:7, as part of the extensive genealogies in the book, directly supports the broader purpose of 1 Chronicles: to reassure and re-establish the identity of the returned exiles. By meticulously tracing the high priestly line, it validates the priesthood and the centrality of temple worship, which were essential for the spiritual and national restoration of Judah. It reminds them of their rich heritage, God's enduring covenant with them, and the importance of maintaining proper worship and leadership. The verse contributes to the overarching theme of God's faithfulness and the continuity of His plan for His people, even after the trauma of exile.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 6:7 meticulously details the earthly lineage of the Aaronic high priests like Meraioth, Amariah, and Ahitub, this very emphasis on a genealogical succession ultimately points to the superior, eternal priesthood of Jesus Christ. The Levitical priesthood, though divinely instituted and essential for Old Covenant worship, was inherently temporary and imperfect. It required a continuous line of priests who, being mortal, would die and need successors, and who, being sinful, would need to offer sacrifices for their own sins before they could intercede for others (as noted in Hebrews 7:23-27). This constant need for new priests and repeated sacrifices highlighted the inadequacy of the system to bring about perfect atonement. Jesus, however, fulfills and transcends this Old Testament paradigm. He is the ultimate High Priest, not according to the order of Aaron, but "according to the order of Melchizedek" (Hebrews 7:17), a priesthood that is eternal and without genealogical succession. His sacrifice was "once for all" (Hebrews 9:12), perfectly atoning for sin and making continuous sacrifices unnecessary. Thus, the diligent recording of the Aaronic lineage in 1 Chronicles 6:7 serves as a vital backdrop, demonstrating the need for a perfect, permanent High Priest who would not "begat" successors because His priesthood is eternal and His work of salvation is complete, securing an everlasting covenant for all who believe.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 6 verses 1–30

The priests and Levites were more concerned than any other Israelites to preserve their pedigree clear and to be able to prove it, because all the honours and privileges of their office depended upon their descent. And we read of those who, though perhaps they really were children of the priests, yet, because they could not find the register of their genealogies, nor make out their descent by any authentic record, were, as polluted, put from the priesthood, and forbidden to eat of the holy things, Ezr 2:62, Ezr 2:63. It is but very little that is here recorded of the genealogies of this sacred tribe. I. The first fathers of it are here named twice, Ch1 6:1, Ch1 6:16. Gershom, Kohath, and Merari, are three names which we were very conversant with in the book of Numbers, when the families of the Levites were marshalled and had their work assigned to them. Aaron, and Moses, and Miriam, we have known much more of than their names, and cannot pass them over here without remembering that this was that Moses and Aaron whom God honoured in making them instruments of Israel's deliverance and settlement and figures of him that was to come, Moses as a prophet and Aaron as a priest. And the mention of Nadab and Abihu (though, having no children, there was no occasion to bring them into the genealogy) cannot but remind us of the terrors of that divine justice which they were made monuments of for offering strange fire, that we may always fear before him. 2. The line of Eleazar, the successor of Aaron, is here drawn down to the time of the captivity, Ch1 6:4-15. It begins with Eleazar, who came out of the house of bondage in Egypt, and ends with Jehozadak, who went into the house of bondage in Babylon. Thus, for their sins, they were left as they were found, which might also intimate that the Levitical priesthood did not make anything perfect, but this was to be done by the bringing in of a better hope. All these here named were not high priests; for, in the time of the judges, that dignity was, upon some occasion or other, brought into the family of Ithamar, of which Eli was; but in Zadok it returned again to the right line. Of Azariah it is here said (v. 10), He it is that executed the priest's office in the temple that Solomon built. It is supposed that this was that Azariah who bravely opposed the presumption of king Uzziah when he invaded the priest's office (Ch2 26:17, Ch2 26:18), though he ventured his neck by so doing. This was done like a priest, like one that was truly zealous for his God. He that thus boldly maintained and defended the priest's office, and made good its barriers against such a daring insult, might well be said to execute it; and this honour is put upon him for it; while Urijah, one of his successors, for a base compliance with King Ahaz, in building him an idolatrous altar, has the disgrace put upon him of being left out of this genealogy, as perhaps some others are. But some think that this remark upon this Azariah should have been added to his grandfather of the same name (Ch1 6:9), who was the son of Ahimaaz, and that he was the priest who first officiated in Solomon's temple. 3. Some other of the families of the Levites are here accounted for. One of the families of Gershom (that of Libni) is here drawn down as far as Samuel, who had the honour of a prophet added to that of a Levite. One of the families of Merari (that of Mahli) is likewise drawn down for several descents, Ch1 6:29, Ch1 6:30.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–30. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 6:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.