Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
The son of Ethni, the son of Zerah, the son of Adaiah,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
The son H1121 of Ethni H867, the son H1121 of Zerah H2226, the son H1121 of Adaiah H5718,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
the son of Etni, the son of Zerach the son of 'Adayah,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
the son of Ethni, the son of Zerah, the son of Adaiah,
Ask
American Standard Version
the son of Ethni, the son of Zerah, the son of Adaiah,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
the son of Ethni, the son of Zerah, the son of Adaiah,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
The sonne of Ethni, the sonne of Zerah, the sonne of Adaiah,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
son of Ethni, son of Zerah, son of Adaiah,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 10,496 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 6:41 is a concise yet significant entry within the extensive Levitical genealogies meticulously recorded by the Chronicler, specifically detailing a segment of the lineage of Kohath, one of Levi's three sons, through his prominent descendant Heman, a chief temple musician. This verse, "The son of Ethni, the son of Zerah, the son of Adaiah," precisely records three generations, underscoring the Chronicler's profound concern for establishing and preserving the legitimate lines of those appointed for sacred service in the tabernacle and later the temple, particularly for the crucial role of worship leadership. It highlights the divine order and continuity essential for the proper functioning of Israel's covenant relationship with God.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 6:41 is deeply embedded within the comprehensive genealogical sections that open the book of 1 Chronicles, spanning chapters 1-9. This particular chapter meticulously traces the descendants of Levi, the tribe divinely set apart for priestly and Levitical service. Within chapter 6, the Chronicler dedicates significant attention to the three main Levitical clans—Gershon, Kohath, and Merari—and then specifically highlights the lineages of those appointed for musical service in the temple, such as Heman, Asaph, and Ethan/Jeduthun. Verse 41 falls within the detailed lineage of Heman, a prominent Kohathite musician, emphasizing the precise and unbroken chain of descent required for those holding sacred offices, especially those involved in leading worship. The meticulous nature of these lists reflects the Chronicler's post-exilic concern for re-establishing proper worship and order in the rebuilt community, ensuring that only those with legitimate lineage performed sacred duties.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was most likely composed in the post-exilic period, roughly between 450-400 BCE, when the returned exiles were actively rebuilding their community, the temple, and their national identity in Judah. In ancient Israel, as in the wider ancient Near East, genealogies were far more than mere lists of names; they served as vital legal, social, and religious documents. They established tribal affiliation, land rights, inheritance, and, crucially for the Levites, legitimacy for sacred service within the temple cult. For the Chronicler's audience, who had returned from a devastating exile, the precise identification of priestly and Levitical lines was paramount for restoring the temple cult according to Mosaic law. The inclusion of seemingly obscure names like Ethni, Zerah, and Adaiah underscores the meticulous record-keeping and the profound importance placed on authentic lineage for maintaining divine order and ensuring the continuity of proper worship and covenant faithfulness. This historical backdrop highlights the practical and theological necessity of such detailed records for the community's restoration and future.
  • Key Themes: The inclusion of 1 Chronicles 6:41 within the broader genealogical framework contributes to several overarching themes in the book of Chronicles. First, it powerfully affirms Divine Order and Succession. The meticulous tracing of lineage demonstrates God's systematic approach to establishing roles and ensuring proper succession for sacred service, vital for maintaining the integrity of worship practices and the functions of the tabernacle and temple. This divine ordering is central to the Chronicler's vision for a restored Israel. Second, it speaks to God's Faithfulness Through Generations. Even in what appears to be a simple list of names, this verse illustrates God's enduring commitment to preserving families and lineages over many centuries, fulfilling His covenant promises, a theme echoed in God's foundational promise to Abraham in Genesis 12:2 to make him a great nation. Third, it underscores the Importance of Heritage and Legitimacy. For the ancient Israelites, understanding their lineage was fundamental to their identity, their tribal affiliation, and their place within the covenant community. These genealogies served as a powerful reminder of their history and God's hand in it, ensuring that only those with legitimate descent could perform sacred duties, as seen in the stringent requirements for priestly service after the exile in Ezra 2:62.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Son (Hebrew, bên, H1121): From the root meaning "to build," this recurring term is the structural backbone of the genealogy. It signifies direct lineal descent, establishing the precise familial relationship between each listed individual. In the context of genealogies, "son" is not merely biological but denotes a direct link in the chain of heritage, crucial for establishing legitimacy and continuity of lineage, especially for those in sacred service. Its repetition emphasizes the unbroken and verifiable nature of the ancestry, highlighting the foundational role of each generation in "building" the family name and legacy.
  • Ethni (Hebrew, ʼEthnîy, H867): Perhaps derived from a root meaning "munificence" or "gift," Ethni serves as a specific, identifiable link in the genealogical chain. The Chronicler's purpose in including this name is not to provide biographical detail but to validate the continuity of the line leading to Heman, the chief temple musician. Its presence ensures the meticulous record-keeping necessary for authenticating the lineage of those appointed for sacred worship.
  • Adaiah (Hebrew, ʻĂdâyâh, H5718): Meaning "Jah has adorned" or "Yahweh has passed over," this name, like Ethni and Zerah, functions primarily as a genealogical marker. While the etymology of "Adaiah" carries a theological nuance, subtly pointing to God's favor or intervention, the Chronicler's main purpose in listing it is to provide another verifiable point in the ancestral record. Its presence, along with the other names, reinforces the meticulous nature of the record-keeping concerning those dedicated to God's service and the transmission of a sacred heritage.

Verse Breakdown

  • "The son of Ethni": This initial phrase identifies the immediate descendant in this specific segment of the lineage. It establishes a direct, verifiable link in the ancestral chain, indicating that the individual being traced is the direct offspring of Ethni, thereby connecting them to the broader Kohathite line.
  • "the son of Zerah": This clause extends the lineage backward, identifying Ethni as the son of Zerah. It further clarifies the line of descent, moving from the immediate parent to the grandparent, reinforcing the generational continuity and the depth of the historical record being preserved.
  • "the son of Adaiah": This final clause in the verse completes the three-generation segment, indicating that Zerah was the son of Adaiah. This precise naming of father-son relationships over multiple generations highlights the Chronicler's meticulous attention to detail in validating the Levitical lineage, which was essential for the legitimacy of temple service in the post-exilic community and for demonstrating God's faithfulness in preserving His chosen lines.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 6:41, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is a specific literary form designed to establish lineage, identity, and legitimacy, particularly crucial for the post-exilic community. The Chronicler employs this device extensively to connect the returned exiles to their pre-exilic heritage, focusing intensely on the royal line of David and the priestly/Levitical lines. The repetitive structure of "the son of X, the son of Y, the son of Z" is a clear example of Anaphora or Repetition, where the repeated phrase "the son of" serves to emphasize the direct, unbroken chain of descent. This repetition lends a sense of authority, meticulousness, and undeniable continuity to the record, reinforcing the idea of a divinely ordained and preserved order. Furthermore, the very act of listing individual names, even seemingly minor ones, also subtly employs Synecdoche, where the individual names stand in for the entire generational history and the continuity of God's covenant with His people through their chosen lines, signifying the whole by one of its parts.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 6:41, though a small part of a vast genealogy, speaks volumes about God's meticulous nature and the significance of every individual within His grand design. It underscores the divine value placed on order, continuity, and faithfulness across generations. The Chronicler's painstaking effort to record these names reflects a profound theological conviction that God works through specific people and established lines to fulfill His purposes, particularly in the realm of worship and covenant keeping. This verse reminds us that God's plan is not haphazard but carefully orchestrated, valuing the contribution of each link in the chain, even those who may seem obscure. It also highlights the importance of heritage, not just physical, but spiritual—the passing down of faith and service from one generation to the next, ensuring the preservation of God's truth and the continuity of His work.

  • Numbers 3:15 - Illustrates the meticulous counting and ordering of the Levitical families for their specific roles in service to God.
  • Luke 3:23-38 - Provides another extensive genealogy, emphasizing the importance of lineage for establishing identity and messianic claims, connecting Jesus to both David and Adam.
  • Hebrews 7:3 - Contrasts the Levitical priesthood, which strictly depends on verifiable genealogy, with the superior, eternal priesthood of Melchizedek and Christ, which transcends such earthly requirements.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While a simple list of names might initially seem distant from modern life, 1 Chronicles 6:41 offers profound lessons for contemporary believers. It reminds us that God's attention to detail extends to every individual within His plan, no matter how seemingly insignificant. Just as Ethni, Zerah, and Adaiah were crucial links in a divinely ordained lineage, so too is every believer a vital part of God's ongoing story, a unique thread in the tapestry of His kingdom. This verse encourages us to value our spiritual heritage, recognizing that we stand on the shoulders of generations of faithful men and women who have served God, often in obscurity. Our faithful service, no matter how small or unseen by human eyes, contributes to a larger, eternal tapestry that God is weaving. It challenges us to embrace our unique place within God's family, knowing that our obedience and faithfulness, however quiet, are meticulously recorded and deeply valued by God. We are called to be faithful stewards of the spiritual legacy we receive and to intentionally pass it on to future generations, ensuring the continuity of God's redemptive work in the world.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous detail of biblical genealogies, like 1 Chronicles 6:41, challenge my perception of God's attention to detail in my own life and in the grand sweep of history?
  • In what ways am I a "link" in a spiritual lineage, both receiving from the past and contributing to the future of God's kingdom?
  • How can I faithfully serve God in roles that may seem "obscure" or unheralded, knowing that my contribution is significant in His eyes and part of His eternal plan?
  • What aspects of my spiritual heritage am I most grateful for, and how can I intentionally preserve and pass them on to those who come after me?

FAQ

Why are biblical genealogies, like 1 Chronicles 6:41, so detailed and seemingly repetitive?

Answer: Biblical genealogies are far more than mere lists; they serve critical theological, historical, and legal functions. For the Chronicler, writing in the post-exilic period, the meticulous detail was essential for re-establishing the identity, land rights, and especially the legitimacy of the priestly and Levitical lines. The repetition of "the son of" emphasizes the unbroken and verifiable chain of descent, which was crucial for ensuring that only those with legitimate lineage could perform sacred duties in the rebuilt temple. These lists affirm divine order, continuity, and God's faithfulness in preserving His covenant people and their roles throughout history. They are not merely historical records but profound theological statements about God's purposeful work through generations, ensuring the proper administration of His covenant and the continuity of His worship among His people.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 6:41 focuses on the physical lineage necessary for Old Testament temple service, it ultimately points to the greater fulfillment found in Jesus Christ. The meticulous genealogies of the Old Testament, including this one, underscore the importance of proper lineage for covenant promises and legitimate service, a concept brought to its ultimate climax in the genealogies of Jesus found in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38. These New Testament genealogies establish Jesus' perfect human lineage, qualifying Him as the promised Messiah, the Son of David, and the ultimate High Priest. Furthermore, in Christ, the emphasis shifts from physical descent to spiritual adoption. Through faith in Him, believers become part of a new, spiritual lineage, children of God, as proclaimed in John 1:12. The Levitical service, which required specific lineage for access to God's presence and ministry, finds its ultimate purpose and completion in Christ, who is our perfect High Priest (as described in Hebrews 7:24-28) and the true "temple" (as Jesus Himself declared in John 2:19-21). Thus, the meticulous record of Ethni, Zerah, and Adaiah, ensuring proper service in the earthly temple, foreshadows the perfect, eternal service of Christ and the spiritual priesthood of all believers in Him, who are now called to offer spiritual sacrifices (as exhorted in 1 Peter 2:5).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 6 verses 31–53

When the Levites were first ordained in the wilderness much of the work then appointed them lay in carrying and taking care of the tabernacle and the utensils of it, while they were in their march through the wilderness. In David's time their number was increased; and, though the greater part of them was dispersed all the nation over, to teach the people the good knowledge of the Lord, yet those that attended the house of God were so numerous that there was not constant work for them all; and therefore David, by special commission and direction from God, new-modelled the Levites, as we shall find in the latter part of this book. Here we are told what the work was which he assigned them.

I. Singing-work, Ch1 6:31. David was raised up on high to be the sweet psalmist of Israel (Sa2 23:1), not only to pen psalms, but to appoint the singing of them in the house of the Lord (not so much because he was musical as because he was devout), and this he did after that the ark had rest. While that was in captivity, obscure, and unsettled, the harps were hung upon the willow-trees: singing was then thought unseasonable (when the bridegroom is taken away they shall fast); but the harps being resumed, and the songs revived, at the bringing up of the ark, they were continued afterwards. For we should rejoice as much in the prolonging of our spiritual privileges as in the restoring of them. When the service of the ark was much superseded by its rest they had other work cut out for them (for Levites should never be idle) and were employed in the service of song. Thus when the people of God come to the rest which remains for them above they shall take leave of all their burdens and be employed in everlasting songs. These singers kept up that service in the tabernacle till the temple was built, and then they waited on their office there, Ch1 6:32. When they came to that stately magnificent house they kept as close both to their office and to their order as they had done in the tabernacle. It is a pity that the preferment of the Levites should ever make them remiss in their business. We have here an account of the three great masters who were employed in the service of the sacred song, with their respective families; for they waited with their children, that is, such as descended from them or were allied to them, Ch1 6:33. Heman, Asaph, and Ethan, were the three that were appointed to this service, one of each of the three houses of the Levites, that there might be an equality in the distribution of this work and honour, and that every one might know his post, such an admirable order was there in this choir service. 1. Of the house of Kohath was Heman with his family (Ch1 6:33), a man of a sorrowful spirit, if it be the same Heman that penned the 88th psalm, and yet a singer. He was the grandson of Samuel the prophet, the son of Joel, of whom it is said that he walked not in the ways of Samuel (Sa1 8:2, Sa1 8:3); but it seems, though the son did not, the grandson did. Thus does the blessing entailed on the seed of the upright sometimes pass over one generation and fasten upon the next. And this Heman, though the grandson of that mighty prince, did not think it below him to be a precentor in the house of God. David himself was willing to be a door-keeper. Rather we may look upon this preferment of the grandson in the church as a recompense for the humble modest resignation which the grandfather made of his authority in the state. Many such ways God has of making up his people's losses and balancing their disgraces. Perhaps David, in making Heman the chief, had some respect to his old friend Samuel. 2. Of the house of Gershom was Asaph, called his brother, because in the same office and of the same tribe, though of another family. He was posted on Heman's right hand in the choir, Ch1 6:39. Several of the psalms bear his name, being either penned by him or tuned by him as the chief musician. It is plain that he was the penman of some psalms; for we read of those that praised the Lord in the words of David and of Asaph. He was a seer as well as a singer, Ch2 29:30. His pedigree is traced up here, through names utterly unknown, as high as Levi, Ch1 6:39-43. 3. Of the house of Merari was Ethan (Ch1 6:44), who was appointed to Heman's left hand. His pedigree is also traced up to Levi, Ch1 6:47. If these were the Heman and Ethan that penned the 88th and 89th psalms, there appears no reason here why they should be called Ezrahites (see the titles of those psalms), as there does why those should be called so who are mentioned Ch1 2:6, and who were the sons of Zerah.

II. There was serving-work, abundance of service to be done in the tabernacle of the house of God (Ch1 6:48), to provide water and fuel, - to wash and sweep, and carry out ashes, - to kill, and flay, and boil the sacrifices; and to all such services there were Levites appointed, those of other families, or perhaps those that were not fit to be singers, that had either no good voice or no good ear. As every one has received the gift, so let him minister. Those that could not sing must not therefore be laid aside as good for nothing; though they were not fit for that service, there was other service they might be useful in.

III. There was sacrificing-work, and that was to be done by the priests only, Ch1 6:49. They only were to sprinkle the blood and burn the incense; as for the work of the most holy place, that was to be done by the high priest only. Each had his work, and they both needed one another and both helped one another in it. Concerning the work of the priests we are here told, 1. What was the end they were to have in their eye. They were to make an atonement for Israel, to mediate between the people and God; not to magnify and enrich themselves, but to serve the public. They were ordained for men. 2. What was the rule they were to have in their eye. They presided in God's house, yet must do as they were bidden, according to all that God commanded. That law the highest are subject to.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 31–53. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 6:41 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.