Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
The son of Tahath, the son of Assir, the son of Ebiasaph, the son of Korah,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
The son H1121 of Tahath H8480, the son H1121 of Assir H617, the son H1121 of Ebiasaph H43, the son H1121 of Korah H7141,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
the son of Tachat, the son of Asir, the son of Evyasaf, the son of Korach,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
the son of Tahath, the son of Assir, the son of Ebiasaph, the son of Korah,
Ask
American Standard Version
the son of Tahath, the son of Assir, the son of Ebiasaph, the son of Korah,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
the son of Tahath, the son of Assir, the son of Ebiasaph, the son of Korah,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
The sonne of Tahath, the sonne of Assir, the sonne of Ebiasaph, the sonne of Korah,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
son of Tahath, son of Assir, son of Ebiasaph, son of Korah,
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 6:37 is a crucial verse within the extensive Levitical genealogies, meticulously tracing the lineage of Heman, a prominent temple musician appointed by King David, back to his ancestor Korah. This verse, part of a larger record of the priestly and Levitical families, serves to establish the legitimate identity and roles of those serving in the post-exilic temple, remarkably highlighting God's enduring grace and redemptive power by showcasing a line that, despite its infamous origin in rebellion, was preserved and elevated to a position of sacred service and worship.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 6 is primarily dedicated to the genealogies of the Levites, meticulously detailing the lineages of Levi's three sons: Gershon, Kohath, and Merari. The Chronicler's overarching purpose in compiling these detailed lists, particularly for the priests and Levites, was to establish continuity, legitimacy, and proper order for the re-established temple worship after the Babylonian exile. The chapter first traces the high priestly line of Aaron, then shifts to the other Levitical families, culminating in the identification of key figures like Heman, Asaph, and Ethan (or Jeduthun), who were appointed by King David to lead the temple music. Verse 37 specifically falls within the Kohathite branch, tracing Heman's ancestry through Tahath, Assir, and Ebiasaph, back to Korah. This meticulous record underscores the Chronicler's emphasis on divine appointment, the unbroken chain of sacred service, and the importance of proper lineage for temple roles.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was likely composed after the Babylonian exile, during the Persian period (5th-4th century BCE), a time when the Jewish community was rebuilding its identity and institutions in Judah. For the returning exiles, genealogies were not mere historical curiosities; they were vital documents for establishing tribal affiliation, land rights, and, most critically, eligibility for priestly and Levitical service in the newly re-established temple. The Levites, as a tribe, were divinely set apart for assisting the priests in the tabernacle and later the temple. Within this context, the inclusion of Korah's descendants is particularly striking. Korah's rebellion against Moses and Aaron, detailed in Numbers 16, resulted in severe divine judgment. Yet, the survival and flourishing of a branch of his family, specifically in roles of sacred music and gatekeeping, speaks volumes about God's sovereignty and grace. Culturally, music was an integral and highly valued component of Israelite worship, making the legitimate lineage of a chief musician like Heman of immense significance.
  • Key Themes: This verse, nestled within the broader genealogical record, contributes profoundly to several overarching themes. First, it powerfully illustrates Divine Preservation and Grace. Despite the severe judgment on Korah for his rebellion, God mercifully preserved a remnant of his family, demonstrating that divine wrath does not always consume an entire lineage and that God's grace can extend beyond immediate judgment to redeem. Second, it reinforces the theme of Legitimacy and Continuity in Israel's worship. By meticulously tracing the lines of temple servants, the Chronicler validates their roles and ensures the proper functioning of the post-exilic cult. The inclusion of Korah's descendants, who became renowned for their faithfulness, underscores that God's covenant promises and purposes endure across generations. Third, the verse highlights Redemption and Restoration. The transformation of a lineage associated with rebellion into one known for devout worship and musical contributions (as evidenced by the "Sons of Korah" psalms, such as Psalm 42 and Psalm 84) is a profound testament to God's ability to redeem and repurpose even the most unlikely or tarnished backgrounds for His glory. This narrative thread of redemption is also seen in other biblical accounts, such as God's continued covenant with David despite his failures (2 Samuel 7).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Son (Hebrew, bên', H1121): The Hebrew word בֵּן (bên) is consistently used here to denote direct paternal descent. From the root meaning "to build" (בָּנָה), it conveys the idea of a son as a "builder of the family name." While it can sometimes mean "descendant" more broadly, in these precise genealogical lists, its repetitive use emphasizes a direct, unbroken chain from father to son. This precision was crucial for establishing legal, social, and religious identity in ancient Israel, particularly for those serving in the temple.
  • Assir (Hebrew, ʼAççîyr', H617): The name אַסִּיר (ʼAççîyr) means "prisoner." While the etymology of a name does not always directly relate to the individual's character or fate in a genealogy, its presence here is intriguing. It could subtly hint at the "imprisonment" or "bondage" of sin and rebellion that characterized Korah's original act, yet paradoxically, this lineage was freed and elevated to sacred service, highlighting God's power to release from spiritual captivity.
  • Korah (Hebrew, Qôrach', H7141): The name קֹרַח (Qôrach) itself means "baldness" or "ice." However, its profound significance here is not in its etymology but in its infamous historical association. Korah was a Levite who led a rebellion against the divinely appointed leadership of Moses and Aaron, resulting in a dramatic divine judgment where the earth swallowed him and his co-conspirators (Numbers 16:32). His inclusion in this revered lineage, leading to a chief temple musician, is a powerful statement about God's ability to preserve and redeem, transforming a legacy of rebellion into one of worship.

Verse Breakdown

  • "The son of Tahath": This phrase initiates the specific segment of the lineage being highlighted, indicating Tahath as the immediate father in this particular part of the chain leading to Heman. It establishes the direct paternal link, crucial for validating the genealogical record.
  • "the son of Assir": Continues the genealogical progression, identifying Assir as the father of Tahath. This further extends the direct paternal line backward, meticulously tracing the ancestry link by link, reinforcing the unbroken nature of the lineage.
  • "the son of Ebiasaph": Adds another link, with Ebiasaph being the father of Assir. This clause continues the detailed backward tracing, emphasizing the careful record-keeping and the importance of each individual in the ancestral chain for establishing legitimacy.
  • "the son of Korah": This final clause in the verse is the most significant, establishing the direct descent of this branch of the Levites from Korah. It is this connection that provides the profound theological and thematic implications, linking a future chief musician (Heman, whose lineage is being traced) to a notorious rebel, and underscoring the themes of divine grace, preservation, and the potential for redemption.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device employed in 1 Chronicles 6:37 is Genealogy. This is a pervasive feature in biblical literature, particularly in historical books, serving to establish lineage, legitimacy, and continuity. In this specific context, the genealogy is far from a mere dry list of names; it functions as a profound theological statement. The Repetition of "the son of" (or "son of") throughout the verse and the broader chapter emphasizes the direct, unbroken chain of descent, reinforcing the authenticity and divine appointment of the individuals mentioned for their sacred roles. There is also a powerful element of Irony and Contrast at play: the lineage of Korah, infamous for his rebellion against God's appointed authority, becomes a line celebrated for its faithful service and musical contributions to temple worship. This unexpected turn highlights God's redemptive power, transforming a story of judgment into one of grace. The name Korah, initially a symbol of defiance and divine wrath, is implicitly transformed into a testament to divine mercy and the potential for Restoration within God's sovereign plan.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 6:37, though a seemingly simple genealogical entry, carries profound theological weight. It serves as a powerful testament to God's enduring grace and His sovereign ability to work through and redeem even the most unlikely or tarnished lineages. The preservation of Korah's line, despite his infamous rebellion and the divine judgment that followed, demonstrates that God's mercy can transcend human failure and that sin does not necessarily disqualify future generations from divine service. This verse underscores the truth that God's plans are not thwarted by human sin, and He can transform a past of rebellion into a future of faithful worship. It speaks to the continuity of God's covenant and His faithfulness across generations, ensuring that those appointed for sacred service are legitimate and divinely chosen, even if their ancestry includes moments of profound human failing. This narrative provides a powerful counterpoint to the idea of inherited guilt, emphasizing God's individual dealings with each generation while also highlighting His overarching redemptive purposes.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The seemingly mundane listing of names in 1 Chronicles 6:37 holds a profound and liberating message for believers today: our past, or the past of our families, does not ultimately define our potential for God's redemptive purposes. Just as God mercifully preserved and elevated the descendants of Korah, transforming a lineage associated with rebellion into one renowned for its devout worship and musical contributions to the temple, so too can He redeem and repurpose any life or family history for His glory. This verse encourages us to embrace God's limitless grace, understanding that His call to service is not contingent on a perfect pedigree or an unblemished past, but on His sovereign choice and transformative power. It reminds us that God is in the business of restoration, turning stories of failure into testimonies of His faithfulness, and empowering us to serve Him regardless of our background. We are invited to step into His purposes, confident that His grace is sufficient to overcome any past blemish or inherited struggle.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does God's preservation of Korah's lineage challenge our assumptions about who is "qualified" or "unqualified" for divine service?
  • In what specific ways can we identify God's redemptive power at work in our own lives or in the lives of those around us, transforming past failures into future service?
  • What does this verse teach us about the enduring nature of God's grace and His faithfulness across generations, and how does that encourage us in our own walk of faith?

FAQ

Why is Korah's name mentioned if he led a rebellion against Moses and Aaron?

Answer: The mention of Korah's name in this revered lineage is highly significant precisely because of his infamous rebellion recorded in Numbers 16. While Korah and many of his co-conspirators perished in divine judgment, Numbers 26:11 explicitly states that "the sons of Korah did not die." This verse in 1 Chronicles 6:37, along with other passages, confirms that a branch of his family survived and was not permanently disqualified from God's service. Their inclusion highlights God's sovereign grace and mercy, demonstrating that divine judgment on one generation does not necessarily condemn all future generations. It also underscores the Chronicler's purpose: to show the continuity of God's plan and the legitimacy of the Levites serving in the post-exilic temple, even those from a controversial lineage. It's a powerful testimony to God's redemptive character.

What was the later role of the "sons of Korah" in Israel's worship?

Answer: The descendants of Korah, often referred to as the "sons of Korah," became prominent and highly esteemed figures in Israel's worship life. They served as temple musicians, gatekeepers, and composers of sacred songs. Notably, eleven psalms in the book of Psalms are attributed to the "Sons of Korah" (e.g., Psalm 42, Psalm 44, Psalm 45, Psalm 46, Psalm 47, Psalm 48, Psalm 49, Psalm 84, Psalm 85, Psalm 87, Psalm 88). These psalms often express deep longing for God, trust in His presence, and praise for His mighty acts, showcasing a profound spiritual devotion that stands in stark contrast to their ancestor's rebellion. Their story is a powerful example of redemption and transformation within the biblical narrative, demonstrating how God can use even a lineage marked by sin for His glory and purposes.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The narrative embedded within 1 Chronicles 6:37, particularly the redemption of Korah's lineage from rebellion to sacred service, finds its ultimate and most profound fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The grace extended to Korah's descendants, allowing them to participate in the worship of God despite their ancestral stain, perfectly foreshadows the boundless grace offered to all humanity through Christ. We, like Korah's rebellious line, were once "dead in trespasses and sins," children of wrath by nature, alienated from God (Ephesians 2:1-3). Yet, through Christ's atoning sacrifice, God, "being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you have been saved" (Ephesians 2:4-5). Jesus, the true and ultimate High Priest, not only redeems us from the curse of sin and our past failures but grafts us into a new, divine lineage. Through faith in Him, we become "new creation[s]" (2 Corinthians 5:17), adopted as "children of God" (John 1:12), and are given a new identity and purpose: to worship God and serve Him in the "royal priesthood" (1 Peter 2:9). The story of Korah's sons becoming faithful worshipers is a beautiful, albeit partial, picture of the radical transformation and inclusion that is fully realized for all believers in the person and work of Jesus Christ, who makes all things new (Revelation 21:5).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 6 verses 31–53

When the Levites were first ordained in the wilderness much of the work then appointed them lay in carrying and taking care of the tabernacle and the utensils of it, while they were in their march through the wilderness. In David's time their number was increased; and, though the greater part of them was dispersed all the nation over, to teach the people the good knowledge of the Lord, yet those that attended the house of God were so numerous that there was not constant work for them all; and therefore David, by special commission and direction from God, new-modelled the Levites, as we shall find in the latter part of this book. Here we are told what the work was which he assigned them.

I. Singing-work, Ch1 6:31. David was raised up on high to be the sweet psalmist of Israel (Sa2 23:1), not only to pen psalms, but to appoint the singing of them in the house of the Lord (not so much because he was musical as because he was devout), and this he did after that the ark had rest. While that was in captivity, obscure, and unsettled, the harps were hung upon the willow-trees: singing was then thought unseasonable (when the bridegroom is taken away they shall fast); but the harps being resumed, and the songs revived, at the bringing up of the ark, they were continued afterwards. For we should rejoice as much in the prolonging of our spiritual privileges as in the restoring of them. When the service of the ark was much superseded by its rest they had other work cut out for them (for Levites should never be idle) and were employed in the service of song. Thus when the people of God come to the rest which remains for them above they shall take leave of all their burdens and be employed in everlasting songs. These singers kept up that service in the tabernacle till the temple was built, and then they waited on their office there, Ch1 6:32. When they came to that stately magnificent house they kept as close both to their office and to their order as they had done in the tabernacle. It is a pity that the preferment of the Levites should ever make them remiss in their business. We have here an account of the three great masters who were employed in the service of the sacred song, with their respective families; for they waited with their children, that is, such as descended from them or were allied to them, Ch1 6:33. Heman, Asaph, and Ethan, were the three that were appointed to this service, one of each of the three houses of the Levites, that there might be an equality in the distribution of this work and honour, and that every one might know his post, such an admirable order was there in this choir service. 1. Of the house of Kohath was Heman with his family (Ch1 6:33), a man of a sorrowful spirit, if it be the same Heman that penned the 88th psalm, and yet a singer. He was the grandson of Samuel the prophet, the son of Joel, of whom it is said that he walked not in the ways of Samuel (Sa1 8:2, Sa1 8:3); but it seems, though the son did not, the grandson did. Thus does the blessing entailed on the seed of the upright sometimes pass over one generation and fasten upon the next. And this Heman, though the grandson of that mighty prince, did not think it below him to be a precentor in the house of God. David himself was willing to be a door-keeper. Rather we may look upon this preferment of the grandson in the church as a recompense for the humble modest resignation which the grandfather made of his authority in the state. Many such ways God has of making up his people's losses and balancing their disgraces. Perhaps David, in making Heman the chief, had some respect to his old friend Samuel. 2. Of the house of Gershom was Asaph, called his brother, because in the same office and of the same tribe, though of another family. He was posted on Heman's right hand in the choir, Ch1 6:39. Several of the psalms bear his name, being either penned by him or tuned by him as the chief musician. It is plain that he was the penman of some psalms; for we read of those that praised the Lord in the words of David and of Asaph. He was a seer as well as a singer, Ch2 29:30. His pedigree is traced up here, through names utterly unknown, as high as Levi, Ch1 6:39-43. 3. Of the house of Merari was Ethan (Ch1 6:44), who was appointed to Heman's left hand. His pedigree is also traced up to Levi, Ch1 6:47. If these were the Heman and Ethan that penned the 88th and 89th psalms, there appears no reason here why they should be called Ezrahites (see the titles of those psalms), as there does why those should be called so who are mentioned Ch1 2:6, and who were the sons of Zerah.

II. There was serving-work, abundance of service to be done in the tabernacle of the house of God (Ch1 6:48), to provide water and fuel, - to wash and sweep, and carry out ashes, - to kill, and flay, and boil the sacrifices; and to all such services there were Levites appointed, those of other families, or perhaps those that were not fit to be singers, that had either no good voice or no good ear. As every one has received the gift, so let him minister. Those that could not sing must not therefore be laid aside as good for nothing; though they were not fit for that service, there was other service they might be useful in.

III. There was sacrificing-work, and that was to be done by the priests only, Ch1 6:49. They only were to sprinkle the blood and burn the incense; as for the work of the most holy place, that was to be done by the high priest only. Each had his work, and they both needed one another and both helped one another in it. Concerning the work of the priests we are here told, 1. What was the end they were to have in their eye. They were to make an atonement for Israel, to mediate between the people and God; not to magnify and enrich themselves, but to serve the public. They were ordained for men. 2. What was the rule they were to have in their eye. They presided in God's house, yet must do as they were bidden, according to all that God commanded. That law the highest are subject to.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 31–53. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 6:37 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.