TRV
Translation
Complete Jewish Bible
Achi the son of 'Avdi'el the son of Guni was leader of their fathers' house.
American Standard Version
Ahi the son of Abdiel, the son of Guni, chief of their fathers’ houses.
World English Bible Messianic
Ahi the son of Abdiel, the son of Guni, chief of their fathers’ houses.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Ahi the sonne of Abdiel, the sonne of Guni was chiefe of the houshold of their fathers.
Young's Literal Translation
Ahi son of Abdiel, son of Guni, is head of the house of their fathers;
In the KJVVerse 10,444 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Chronicles 5 verses 1–17
1 ¶ Now the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel, (for he was the firstborn; but, forasmuch as he defiled his father's bed, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph the son of Israel: and the genealogy is not to be reckoned after the birthright.
2 For Judah prevailed above his brethren, and of him came the chief ruler; but the birthright was Joseph's:)
3 The sons, I say, of Reuben the firstborn of Israel were, Hanoch, and Pallu, Hezron, and Carmi.
4 The sons of Joel; Shemaiah his son, Gog his son, Shimei his son,
5 Micah his son, Reaia his son, Baal his son,
6 Beerah his son, whom Tilgathpilneser king of Assyria carried away captive: he was prince of the Reubenites.
7 And his brethren by their families, when the genealogy of their generations was reckoned, were the chief, Jeiel, and Zechariah,
8 And Bela the son of Azaz, the son of Shema, the son of Joel, who dwelt in Aroer, even unto Nebo and Baalmeon:
9 And eastward he inhabited unto the entering in of the wilderness from the river Euphrates: because their cattle were multiplied in the land of Gilead.
10 And in the days of Saul they made war with the Hagarites, who fell by their hand: and they dwelt in their tents throughout all the east land of Gilead.
11 And the children of Gad dwelt over against them, in the land of Bashan unto Salchah:
12 Joel the chief, and Shapham the next, and Jaanai, and Shaphat in Bashan.
13 And their brethren of the house of their fathers were, Michael, and Meshullam, and Sheba, and Jorai, and Jachan, and Zia, and Heber, seven.
14 These are the children of Abihail the son of Huri, the son of Jaroah, the son of Gilead, the son of Michael, the son of Jeshishai, the son of Jahdo, the son of Buz;
15 Ahi the son of Abdiel, the son of Guni, chief of the house of their fathers.
16 And they dwelt in Gilead in Bashan, and in her towns, and in all the suburbs of Sharon, upon their borders.
17 All these were reckoned by genealogies in the days of Jotham king of Judah, and in the days of Jeroboam king of Israel.
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points
We have here an extract out of the genealogies,
I. Of the tribe of Reuben, where we have,
1.The reason why this tribe is thus postponed. It is confessed that Reuben was the first-born of Israel, and, upon that account, might challenge the precedency; but he forfeited his birthright by defiling his father's concubine, and was, for that, sentenced not to excel, Gen 49:4. Sin lessens men, thrusts them down from their excellency. Seventh-commandment sins especially leave an indelible stain upon men's names and families, a reproach which time will not wipe away. Reuben's seed, to the last, bear the disgrace of Reuben's sin. Yet, though that tribe was degraded, it was not discarded or disinherited. The sullying of the honour of an Israelite is not the losing of his happiness. Reuben loses his birthright, yet it does not devolve upon Simeon the next in order; for it was typical, and therefore must attend, not the course of nature, but the choice of grace. The advantages of the birthright were dominion and a double portion. Reuben having forfeited these, it was thought too much that both should be transferred to any one, and therefore they were divided. (1.) Joseph had the double portion; for two tribes descended from him, Ephraim and Manasseh, each of whom had a child's part (for so Jacob by faith blessed them, Heb 11:21; Gen 48:15, Gen 48:22), and each of those tribes was as considerable, and made as good a figure, as any one of the twelve, except Judah. But, (2.) Judah had the dominion; on him the dying patriarch entailed the sceptre, Gen 49:10 Of him came the chief ruler, David first, and, in the fulness of time, Messiah the Prince, Mic 5:2. This honour was secured to Judah, though the birthright was Joseph's; and, having this, he needed not envy Joseph the double portion.
2.The genealogy of the princes of this tribe, the chief family of it (many, no doubt, being omitted), to Beerah, who was head of this clan when the king of Assyria carried them captive, Ch1 5:4-6. Perhaps he is mentioned as prince of the Reubenites at that time because he did not do his part to prevent the captivity.
3.The enlargement of the coasts of this tribe. They increasing, and their cattle being multiplied, they crowded out their neighbours the Hagarites, and extended their conquests, though not to the river Euphrates, yet to the wilderness which abutted upon that river, Ch1 5:9, Ch1 5:10. Thus God did for his people as he promised them: he cast out the enemy from before them by little and little, and gave them their land as they had occasion for it, Exo 23:30.
II. Of the tribe of Gad. Some great families of that tribe are here named (Ch1 5:12), seven that were the children of Abihail, whose pedigree is carried upwards from the son to the father (Ch1 5:14, Ch1 5:15), as that Ch1 5:4, Ch1 5:5, is brought downwards from father to son. These genealogies were perfected in the days of Jotham king of Judah, but were begun some years before, in the reign of Jeroboam II, king of Israel. What particular reason there was for taking these accounts then does not appear; but it was just before they were carried away captive by the Assyrians, as appears Kg2 15:29, Kg2 15:31. When the judgments of God were ready to break out against them for their wretched degeneracy and apostasy then were they priding themselves in their genealogies, that they were the children of the covenant; as the Jews, in our Saviour's time, who, when they were ripe for ruin, boasted, We have Abraham to our father. Or there might be a special providence in it, and a favourable intimation that though they were, for the present, cast out, they were not cast off for ever. What we design to call for hereafter we keep an inventory of.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–17. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 1 Chronicles 5:15 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
1 Chronicles 5:15 introduces Ahi, the son of Abdiel and grandson of Guni, identifying him as the "chief of the house of their fathers" within the tribe of Gad. This concise genealogical entry is far more than a simple record; it serves as a profound affirmation of tribal identity, a testament to the meticulous preservation of heritage, and a recognition of established leadership within ancient Israelite society, particularly vital for the community rebuilding after the Babylonian exile.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The primary literary device employed in 1 Chronicles 5:15, and indeed throughout the opening chapters of Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is not merely a dry list of names but a purposeful literary and theological construct. The Chronicler uses genealogy to establish Continuity, connecting the post-exilic community to their ancient heritage and the promises made to the patriarchs. It serves as a testament to God's faithfulness in preserving His people and their lineage despite exile and dispersion. Additionally, the repetitive "son of" formula creates a sense of Rhythm and Order, underscoring the meticulous nature of the record and the structured organization of Israelite society. The specific naming of "Ahi," "Abdiel," and "Guni" also highlights the significance of Onomastics (the study of names), as Hebrew names often carried profound meanings that reflected character, destiny, or the parents' hopes, contributing to the narrative's subtle theological depth.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The seemingly simple listing of a name and title in 1 Chronicles 5:15 carries profound theological weight. It affirms God's meticulous attention to detail and His sovereign involvement in the lives of individuals and the history of His people. For the post-exilic community, these genealogies were not just historical records; they were living proof of God's enduring covenant faithfulness, demonstrating that He had preserved a remnant and maintained their identity through generations of upheaval. The emphasis on "chiefs" underscores the divine design for order and responsible leadership within the community, reflecting God's desire for His people to be well-governed and to live according to His statutes. This verse reminds us that every person, even those briefly mentioned, plays a part in God's unfolding plan, and that our lineage, both physical and spiritual, is part of a larger, divinely orchestrated narrative.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
1 Chronicles 5:15, though brief, invites us to reflect on our own place within God's vast and intricate story. Just as Ahi was known and recorded, so too are we known by God, each uniquely gifted and positioned within His divine purpose. This verse encourages us to value our heritage, whether it be our physical family lineage, our spiritual lineage within the church, or the traditions of faith passed down through generations. It also prompts us to consider our roles as "chiefs" or leaders in our own spheres of influence—in our families, workplaces, or communities of faith. We are called to exercise responsible leadership, to steward our responsibilities with integrity, and to serve as faithful representatives of Christ. Recognizing that God meticulously records and remembers every detail of our lives should inspire both humility and confidence, knowing that our lives, however seemingly small, contribute to His grand design and are held in His faithful hands.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why are genealogies, like the one in 1 Chronicles 5:15, so important in the Bible?
Answer: Genealogies in the Bible serve multiple critical purposes beyond mere historical record-keeping. For ancient Israel, they were vital legal documents establishing tribal identity, land inheritance rights, and the legitimacy of claims to leadership, particularly for the priestly and Davidic lines. Theologically, they demonstrate God's faithfulness to His covenant promises, showing how He preserved a chosen lineage through generations, even amidst challenges like exile. They also highlight the continuity of God's redemptive plan, culminating in the Messiah. For the post-exilic community of Chronicles, these lists reaffirmed their connection to their past and their place in God's ongoing story, providing hope and a foundation for rebuilding.
What does "chief of the house of their fathers" signify in ancient Israelite society?
Answer: The phrase "chief of the house of their fathers" (Hebrew: ro'sh beit 'avotam) denotes a significant position of patriarchal authority and responsibility. It refers to the recognized head of an extended family unit or clan, which comprised multiple nuclear families tracing their descent from a common male ancestor. This chief was responsible for the welfare, legal affairs, and religious practices of his household. He would represent his family in tribal assemblies, administer justice, and ensure the preservation of traditions and laws. It was a role that combined spiritual, social, and administrative leadership, crucial for maintaining order and identity within the larger tribal structure, as seen in various instances of tribal organization throughout the books of Numbers and Joshua.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
While 1 Chronicles 5:15 meticulously records a physical lineage, its ultimate fulfillment and profound significance are found in Christ. The extensive genealogies of the Old Testament, including those of Gad, ultimately point to the grand narrative of God's faithfulness in preparing the way for the Messiah. Jesus Christ is the ultimate "Chief" and "Head" – not merely of a patriarchal house, but of His church, the new spiritual family of God, as declared in Ephesians 1:22 and Colossians 1:18. He is the one in whom all the promises made to the fathers find their "Yes" and "Amen" (2-Corinthians 1:20). Through His atoning work, our true lineage becomes spiritual, as we are adopted into God's family, becoming children of God not by physical descent but by faith in Him (John 1:12 and Galatians 3:26). Just as Ahi was known by name within his tribal structure, so too does Christ, our Good Shepherd, know each of His sheep by name, calling them into His eternal family (John 10:3). Thus, this ancient genealogical entry foreshadows the ultimate, perfect leadership and familial belonging found only in Christ.