Romans 3:2
“The Value of Jewish Privilege”Romans 3:1–8
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- πολὺpoluMuchG4183A-NSNAdjective Nominative Singular Neuter
- κατὰkatainG2596PREPPreposition
- πάνταpantaeveryG3956A-ASMAdjective Accusative Singular Masculine
- τρόπον·troponwayG5158N-ASMNoun Accusative Singular Masculine
- πρῶτονprōtonChieflyG4413A-ASNAdjective Accusative Singular Neuter
- μὲνmenindeedG3303PRTParticle or Disjunctive
- γὰρgarforG1063CONJConjunction
- ὅτιhotiforG3754CONJConjunction
- ἐπιστεύθησανepisteuthēsanthey were entrusted withG4100V-API-3PVerb Aorist Passive Indicative 3rd Plural
- τὰtatheG3588T-APNDefinite article Accusative Plural Neuter
- λόγιαlogiaoraclesG3051N-APNNoun Accusative Plural Neuter
- τοῦtou[the]G3588T-GSMDefinite article Genitive Singular Masculine
- θεοῦtheouof GodG2316N-GSM-TNoun Genitive Singular Masculine Title
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Romans 3:1–18. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
I.Here the apostle answers several objections, which might be made, to clear his way.
No truth so plain and evident but wicked wits and corrupt carnal hearts will have something to say against it; but divine truths must be cleared from cavil.
Object. 1. If Jew and Gentile stand so much upon the same level before God, what advantage then hath the Jew? Hath not God often spoken with a great deal of respect for the Jews, as a non-such people (Deuteronomy 33:29), a holy nation, a peculiar treasure, the seed of Abraham his friend: Did not he institute circumcision as a badge of their church-membership, and a seal of their covenant-relation to God? Now does not this levelling doctrine deny them all such prerogatives, and reflect dishonour upon the ordinance of circumcision, as a fruitless insignificant thing.
Answer. The Jews are, notwithstanding this, a people greatly privileged and honoured, have great means and helps, though these be not infallibly saving (Romans 3:2): Much every way. The door is open to the Gentiles as well as the Jews, but the Jews have a fairer way up to this door, by reason of their church-privileges, which are not to be undervalued, though many that have them perish eternally for not improving them. He reckons up many of the Jews' privileges Romans 9:4, Romans 9:5; here he mentions but one (which is indeed instar omnium - equivalent to all), that unto them were committed the oracles of God, that is, the scriptures of the Old Testament, especially the law of Moses, which is called the lively oracles (Acts 7:38), and those types, promises, and prophecies, which relate to Christ and the gospel. The scriptures are the oracles of God: they are a divine revelation, they come from heaven, are of infallible truth, and of eternal consequence as oracles. The Septuagint call the Urim and Thummim the logia - the oracles. The scripture is our breast-plate of judgment. We must have recourse to the law and to the testimony, as to an oracle. The gospel is called the oracles of God, Hebrews 5:12; 1 Peter 4:11. Now these oracles were committed to the Jews; the Old Testament was written in their language; Moses and the prophets were of their nation, lived among them, preached and wrote primarily to and for the Jews. They were committed to them as trustees for succeeding ages and churches. The Old Testament was deposited in their hands, to be carefully preserved pure and uncorrupt, and so transmitted down to posterity. The Jews were the Christians' library-keepers, were entrusted with that sacred treasure for their own use and benefit in the first place, and then for the advantage of the world; and, in preserving the letter of the scripture, they were very faithful to their trust, did not lose one iota or tittle, in which we are to acknowledge God's gracious care and providence. The Jews had the means of salvation, but they had not the monopoly of salvation. Now this he mentions with a chiefly, prōton men gar - this was their prime and principal privilege. The enjoyment of God's word and ordinances is the chief happiness of a people, is to be put in the imprimis of their advantages, Deuteronomy 4:8; Deuteronomy 33:3; Psalm 147:20.
Object. 2. Against what he had said of the advantages the Jews had in the lively oracles, some might object the unbelief of many of them. To what purpose were the oracles of God committed to them, when so many of them, notwithstanding these oracles, continued strangers to Christ, and enemies to his gospel? Some did not believe, Romans 3:3.
Answer. It is very true that some, nay most of the present Jews, do not believe in Christ; but shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? The apostle startles at such a thought: God forbid! The infidelity and obstinacy of the Jews could not invalidate and overthrow those prophecies of the Messiah which were contained in the oracles committed to them. Christ will be glorious, though Israel be not gathered, Isaiah 49:5. God's words shall be accomplished, his purposes performed, and all his ends answered, though there be a generation that by their unbelief go about to make God a liar. Let God be true but every man a liar; let us abide by this principle, that God is true to every word which he has spoken, and will let none of his oracles fall to the ground, though thereby we give the lie to man; better question and overthrow the credit of all the men in the world than doubt of the faithfulness of God. What David said in his haste (Psalm 116:11), that all men are liars, Paul here asserts deliberately. Lying is a limb of that old man which we every one of us come into the world clothed with. All men are fickle, and mutable, and given to change, vanity and a lie (Psalm 62:9), altogether vanity, Psalm 39:5. All men are liars, compared with God. It is very comfortable, when we find every man a liar (no faith in man), that God is faithful. When they speak vanity every one with his neighbour, it is very comfortable to think that the words of the Lord are pure words, Psalm 12:2, Psalm 12:6. For the further proof of this he quotes Psalm 51:4, That thou mightest be justified, the design of which is to show, 1. That God does and will preserve his own honour in the world, notwithstanding the sins of men. 2. That it is our duty, in all our conclusions concerning ourselves and others, to justify God and to assert and maintain his justice, truth, and goodness, however it goes. David lays a load upon himself in his confession, that he might justify God, and acquit him from any injustice. So here, Let the credit or reputation of man shift for itself, the matter is not great whether it sink or swim; let us hold fast this conclusion, how specious soever the premises may be to the contrary, that the Lord is righteous in all his ways, and holy in all his works. Thus is God justified in his sayings, and cleared when he judges (as it is Psalm 51:4), or when he is judged, as it is here rendered. When men presume to quarrel with God and his proceedings, we may be sure the sentence will go on God's side.
Object. 3. Carnal hearts might hence take occasion to encourage themselves in sin. He had said that the universal guilt and corruption of mankind gave occasion to the manifestation of God's righteousness in Jesus Christ. Now it may be suggested, If all our sin be so far from overthrowing God's honour that it commends it, and his ends are secured, so that there is no harm done, is it not unjust for God to punish our sin and unbelief so severely? If the unrighteousness of the Jews gave occasion to the calling in of the Gentiles, and so to God's greater glory, why are the Jews so much censured? If our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Romans 3:5. What inference may be drawn from this? Is God unrighteous, mē adikos ho Theos - Is not God unrighteous (so it may be read, more in the form of an objection), who taketh vengeance? Unbelieving hearts will gladly take any occasion to quarrel with equity of God's proceedings, and to condemn him that is most just, Job 34:17. I speak as a man, that is, I object this as the of carnal hearts; it is suggested like a man, a vain, foolish, proud creature.
Answer. God forbid; far be it from us to imagine such a thing. Suggestions that reflect dishonour upon God and his justice and holiness are rather to be startled at than parleyed with. Get thee behind me, Satan; never entertain such a thought. For then how shall God judge the world? Romans 3:6. The argument is much the same with that of Abraham (Genesis 18:25): Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right? No doubt, he shall. If he were not infinitely just and righteous, he would be unfit to be the judge of all the earth. Shall even he that hateth right govern? Job 34:17. Compare Job 34:18, Job 34:19. The sin has never the less of malignity and demerit in it though God bring glory to himself out of it. It is only accidentally that sin commends God's righteousness. No thanks to the sinner for that, who intends no such thing. The consideration of God's judging the world should for ever silence all our doubtings of, and reflections upon, his justice and equity. It is not for us to arraign the proceedings of such an absolute Sovereign. The sentence of the supreme court, whence lies no appeal, is not to be called in question.
Object. 4. The former objection is repeated and prosecuted (Romans 3:7, Romans 3:8), for proud hearts will hardly be beaten out of their refuge of lies, but will hold fast the deceit. But his setting off the objection in its own colours is sufficient to answer it: If the truth of God has more abounded through my lie. He supposes the sophisters to follow their objection thus: "If my lie, that is, my sin" (for there is something of a lie in every sin, especially in the sins of professors) "have occasioned the glorifying of God's truth and faithfulness, why should I be judged and condemned as a sinner, and not rather thence take encouragement to go on in my sin, that grace may abound?" an inference which at first sight appears too black to be argued, and fit to be cast out with abhorrence. Daring sinners take occasion to boast in mischief, because the goodness of God endures continually, Psalm 52:1. Let us do evil that good may come is oftener in the heart than in the mouth of sinners, so justifying themselves in their wicked ways. Mentioning this wicked thought, he observes, in a parenthesis, that there were those who charged such doctrines as this upon Paul and his fellow-ministers: Some affirm that we say so. It is no new thing for the best of God's people and ministers to be charged with holding and teaching such things as they do most detest and abhor; and it is not to be thought strange, when our Master himself was said to be in league with Beelzebub. Many have been reproached as if they had said that the contrary of which they maintain: it is an old artifice of Satan thus to cast dirt upon Christ's ministers, Fortiter calumniari, aliquid adhaerebit - Lay slander thickly on, for some will be sure to stick. The best men and the best truths are subject to slander. Bishop Sanderson makes a further remark upon this, as we are slanderously reported - blasphēmoumetha. Blasphemy in scripture usually signifies the highest degree of slander, speaking ill of God. The slander of a minister and his regular doctrine is a more than ordinary slander, it is a kind of blasphemy, not for his person's sake, but for his calling's sake and his work's sake, 1 Thessalonians 5:13.
Answer. He says no more by way of confutation but that, whatever they themselves may argue, the damnation of those is just. Some understand it of the slanderers; God will justly condemn those who unjustly condemn his truth. Or, rather, it is to be applied to those who embolden themselves in sin under a pretence of God's getting glory to himself out of it. Those who deliberately do evil that good may come of it will be so far from escaping, under the shelter of that excuse, that it will rather justify their damnation, and render them the more inexcusable; for sinning upon such a surmise, and in such a confidence, argues a great deal both of the wit and of the will in the sin - a wicked will deliberately to choose the evil, and a wicked wit to palliate it with the pretence of good arising from it. Therefore their damnation is just; and, whatever excuses of this kind they may now please themselves with, they will none of them stand good in the great day, but God will be justified in his proceedings, and all flesh, even the proud flesh that now lifts up itself against him, shall be silent before him. Some think Paul herein refers to the approaching ruin of the Jewish church and nation, which their obstinacy and self-justification in their unbelief hastened upon them apace.
II.Paul, having removed these objections, next revives his assertion of the general guilt and corruption of mankind in common, both of Jews and Gentiles, Romans 3:9-18. "Are we better than they, we Jews, to whom were committed the oracles of God? Does this recommend us to God, or will this justify us? No, by no means." Or, "Are we Christians (Jews and Gentiles) so much better antecedently than the unbelieving part as to have merited God's grace? Alas! no: before free grace made the difference, those of us that had been Jews and those that had been Gentiles were all alike corrupted." They are all under sin. Under the guilt of sin: under it as under a sentence; - under it as under a bond, by which they are bound over to eternal ruin and damnation; - under it as under a burden (Psalm 38:4) that will sink them to the lowest hell: we are guilty before God, Romans 3:19. Under the government and dominion of sin: under it as under a tyrant and cruel task-master, enslaved to it; - under it as under a yoke; - under the power of it, sold to work wickedness. And this he had proved, proētiasametha. It is a law term: We have charged them with it, and have made good our charge; we have proved the indictment, we have convicted them by the notorious evidence of the fact. This charge and conviction he here further illustrates by several scriptures out of the Old Testament, which describe the corrupt depraved state of all men, till grave restrain or change them; so that herein as in a glass we may all of us behold our natural face. The Romans 3:10, Romans 3:11, and Romans 3:12 verses are taken from Psalm 14:1-3, which are repeated as containing a very weighty truth, Psalm 53:1-3. The rest that follows here is found in the Septuagint translation of the 14th Psalm, which some think the apostle chooses to follow as better known; but I rather think that Paul took these passages from other places of scripture here referred to, but in later copies of the Septuagint they were all added in Psalm 14:1-7 from this discourse of Paul. It is observable that, to prove the general corruption of nature, he quotes some scriptures which speak of the particular corruptions of particular persons, as of Doeg (Psalm 140:3), of the Jews (Isaiah 59:7, Isaiah 59:8), which shows that the same sins that are committed by one are in the nature of all. The times of David and Isaiah were some of the better times, and yet to their days he refers. What is said Psalm 14:1-7 is expressly spoken of all the children of men, and that upon a particular view and inspection made by God himself. The Lord looked down, as upon the old world, Genesis 6:5. And this judgment of God was according to truth. He who, when he himself had made all, looked upon every thing that he had made, and behold all was very good, now that man had marred all, looked, and behold all was very bad. Let us take a view of the particulars. Observe,
1.That which is habitual, which is two-fold: -
(1.)An habitual defect of every thing that is good.
[1.]There is none righteous, none that has an honest good principle of virtue, or is governed by such a principle, none that retains any thing of that image of God, consisting in righteousness, wherein man was created; no, not one; implying that, if there had been but one, God would have found him out. When all the world was corrupt, God had his eye upon one righteous Noah. Even those who through grace are justified and sanctified were none of them righteous by nature. No righteousness is born with us. The man after God's own heart owns himself conceived in sin.
[2.]There is none that understandeth, Romans 3:11. The fault lies in the corruption of the understanding; that is blinded, depraved, perverted. Religion and righteousness have so much reason on their side that if people had but any understanding they would be better and do better. But they do not understand. Sinners are fools.
[3.]None that seeketh after God, that is, none that has any regard to God, any desire after him. Those may justly be reckoned to have no understanding that do not seek after God. The carnal mind is so far from seeking after God that really it is enmity against him.
[4.]They are together become unprofitable, Romans 3:12. Those that have forsaken God soon grow good for nothing, useless burdens of the earth. Those that are in a state of sin are the most unprofitable creatures under the sun; for it follows,
[5.]There is none that doeth good; no, not a just man upon the earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not, Ecclesiastes 7:23. Even in those actions of sinners that have some goodness in them there is a fundamental error in the principle and end; so that it may be said, There is none that doeth good. Malum oritur ex quolibet defectu - Every defect is the source of evil.
(2.)An habitual defection to every thing that is evil: They are all gone out of the way. No wonder that those miss the right way who do not seek after God, the highest end. God made man in the way, set him in right, but he hath forsaken it. The corruption of mankind is an apostasy.
2.That which is actual. And what good can be expected from such a degenerate race? He instances,
(1.)In their words (Romans 3:13, Romans 3:14), in three things particularly: - [1.] Cruelty: Their throat is an open sepulchre, ready to swallow up the poor and innocent, waiting an opportunity to do mischief, like the old serpent seeking to devour, whose name is Abaddon and Apollyon, the destroyer. And when they do not openly avow this cruelty, and vent it publicly, yet they are underhand intending mischief: the poison of asps is under their lips (James 3:8), the most venomous and incurable poison, with which they blast the good name of their neighbour by reproaches, and aim at his life by false witness. These passages are borrowed from Psalm 5:9 and Psalm 140:3. [2.] Cheating: With their tongues they have used deceit. Herein they show themselves the devil's children, for he is a liar, and the father of lies. They have used it: it intimates that they make a trade of lying; it is their constant practice, especially belying the ways and people of God. [3.] Cursing: reflecting upon God, and blaspheming his holy name; wishing evil to their brethren: Their mouth is full of cursing and bitterness. This is mentioned as one of the great sins of the tongue, James 3:9. But those that thus love cursing shall have enough of it, Psalm 109:17-19. How many, who are called Christians, do by these sin evince that they are still under the reign and dominion of sin, still in the condition that they were born in.
(2.)In their ways (Romans 3:15-17): Their feet are swift to shed blood; that is, they are very industrious to compass any cruel design, ready to lay hold of all such opportunities. Wherever they go, destruction and misery go along with them; these are their companions-destruction and misery to the people of God, to the country and neighbourhood where they live, to the land and nation, and to themselves at last. Besides the destruction and misery that are at the end of their ways (death is the end of these things), destruction and misery are in their ways; their sin is its own punishment: a man needs no more to make him miserable than to be a slave to his sins. - And the way of peace have they not known; that is, they know not how to preserve peace with others, nor how to obtain peace for themselves. They may talk of peace, such a peace as is in the devil's palace, while he keeps it, but they are strangers to all true peace; they know not the things that belong to their peace. These are quoted from Proverbs 1:16; Isaiah 59:7, Isaiah 59:8.
(3.)The root of all this we have: There is no fear of God before their eyes, Romans 3:18. The fear of God is here put for all practical religion, which consists in an awful and serious regard to the word and will of God as our rule, to the honour and glory of God as our end. Wicked people have not this before their eyes; that is, they do not steer by it; they are governed by other rules, aim at other ends. This is quoted from Psalm 36:1. Where no fear of God is, no good is to be expected. The fear of God is would lay a restraint upon our spirits, and keep them right, Nehemiah 5:15. When once fear is cast off, prayer is restrained (Job 15:4), and then all goes to wreck and ruin quickly. So that we have here a short account of the general depravity and corruption of mankind; and may say, O Adam! what hast thou done? God made man upright, but thus he hath sought out many inventions.
Historical interpretation
Two Centuries of Reception
4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Even though the oracles of God are now entrusted to the Gentiles as well, they were first entrusted to the Jews, as Paul says. Is he speaking here of the letters and the books or of the meaning and the general gist of the law? For we see many Jews who from infancy to old age never stop studying, yet they never come to a knowledge of the truth. How can it be true that they have some advantage in having been entrusted with the oracles of God first, when they do not understand “what they are saying or the things about which they are making assertions?” … It must be understood that these things are being said about Moses, the prophets and others like them, to whom the oracles of God were entrusted, because there can be no doubt that they were Jews and that they had the circumcision. It would also apply to anyone who was wise, an intelligent listener or a gifted counselor. These the Lord is said to have removed from Jerusalem because he was offended by the ungodliness of the people. … Even the apostles of Christ and Paul himself, the vessel of election, came from the Jews and from the circumcision. He had far more in every way than those whom he taught who were of the Gentiles. For the oracles of God were entrusted to the Jews.Note moreover that Paul says that the oracles of God were entrusted to the Jews, not merely the letter of the text. So it is possible for us to understand that those who read but do not understand, as well as those who read but do not believe, have had only the letter entrusted to them, of which the apostle says: “The letter kills.” But the oracles of God are entrusted to those who understand and believe what Moses wrote and who believe in Christ, as the Lord said: “If you believed Moses you would believe me, for he wrote of me.”5
But if the Jew has received more in receiving the letter and something more in the oracles of God, does this mean that those of the Gentiles who have come to Christ are somehow left out? Or is there some way in which they have more than the Jews? Listen to what the Lord says to the Gentile centurion who believed: “Truly I say to you, I have not found such faith even in Israel.” Therefore you see that when it comes to faith, the Gentiles have much more.… When it comes to the letter, the Jews have much more in every way, but when it comes to faith, it is the Gentiles who have much more.
When Paul says “To begin with,” he does not go on to list a second or third item. He means rather that what he begins with is comprehensive of all good things. For what could be better than to believe the words of God?
Although Paul says that there are many things which pertain to the honor and merit of the seed of Abraham, he records only one of them openly, because it is their greatest boast: They were judged worthy to receive the law, by which they learned to distinguish right from wrong. Only after that was it possible for the value of other things to be understood. But as far as the Jews according to the flesh are concerned (that is, the unbelievers among them), Paul shows that the witness of their race is of no advantage to them. But so as not to appear to be treating them all, including the believers among them, badly, he teaches that the law is very useful to Jewish believers, because they are children of Abraham.For it was to them that the oracles of God were entrusted. It is by the merits of their ancestors that they received the law and were called God’s people.… Egypt was hit by different plagues because of the wrongs which it did to them. They dined on heavenly manna; they were a terror to all nations, as Rahab the harlot bore witness. Moreover, it was to them that Christ the Savior was promised for their sanctification. Therefore Paul says that in many ways it was useful to the Jews, because they were the children of Abraham and came before the Gentiles.
"Much every way: chiefly, because that they were entrusted with the oracles of God." Do you see that, as I said above, it is not their well doings, but the benefits of God, that he everywhere counts up? And what is the word "entrusted?" It means, that they had the Law put into their hands because He held them to be of so much account that He entrusted to them oracles which came down from above. I know indeed that some take the "entrusted" not of the Jews, but of the oracles, as much as to say, the Law was believed in. But the context does not admit of this being held good. For in the first place he is saying this with a view to accuse them, and to show that, though in the enjoyment of many a blessing from above, they yet showed great ingratitude. Then, the context also makes this clear. For he goes on to say, "For what if some did not believe?" If they did not believe, how do some say, the oracles were believed in? What does he mean then? Why that God entrusted the same to them, and not that they trusted to the oracles.
Continue studying Romans 3:2 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.


Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
Paul answers that the Jew’s advantage is great in every way, and first of all because God entrusted his own words, the Old Testament Scriptures, to Israel’s keeping.
“Much every way:”
A full yes. The advantage is great in every respect, so chapter 2 took nothing away from the worth of God’s gifts to Israel.
“chiefly,”
Prōton, “first”. Paul names the privilege that matters most and leaves the rest for later in the letter.
“because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.”
“Committed” (pisteúō) means entrusted. The “oracles” (lógion) are the utterances of God (theós), the Old Testament Scriptures, which Israel was given to guard, preserve and obey.
Passage studyRomans 3:1–8
God Stays True When Men Prove False
Summary
Paul has just shown that a right standing with God is a matter of the heart, whatever a person’s birth or outward sign. He now asks whether Israel’s privileges were worth anything, and he answers that they were worth a great deal, above all because God entrusted his own words to that people. Some of them failed to believe, yet God remains faithful and true, and he is still the righteous Judge of the world. Paul ends by rejecting a slander against his gospel, the claim that we may do evil so that good may come of it.
Why Paul asks what advantage the Jew has
Paul has spent the opening of his letter showing that Gentiles (Romans 1:18–32) and Jews (Romans 2:1–29) alike answer to God’s righteous judgment. He has taken away every ground for boasting in the outward keeping of the Law or in the physical sign of circumcision, and he has said that the true Jew is one inwardly, whose circumcision is of the heart and by the Spirit (Romans 2:28–29).
A Jewish reader would naturally object here. For centuries Israel had known itself as God’s chosen people, set apart by the covenant God made with Abraham and sealed with circumcision (Genesis 17:9–14). The Law, the temple and circumcision stood at the centre of the nation’s life. Under Rome, Jewish communities kept their distinct practices and met both respect and ridicule for them. To hear that these cherished marks held no saving power in themselves was hard. Paul was a Jew himself and knew the objection from the inside, so he raises it in his own words and then answers it. His aim is to show where the worth of Israel’s heritage truly lay.
The word “then” is oûn, a small word that marks a consequence: if what Paul has said is true, what follows for the Jew? “Advantage” is perissós, which means superabundant or superior, so the question is whether the Jew has anything over and above the Gentile. “Profit” is ōphéleia, usefulness or benefit, the practical gain a thing brings. “Circumcision” is peritomḗ, which can mean the rite, the state of being circumcised or the circumcised people, and here it stands for the whole outward side of Jewish identity and Law-keeping.
This way of teaching, in which a speaker voices the questions of an imagined objector and then answers them, was common among Greek philosophers and in Jewish debate. Paul uses it all through these eight verses. The questions also mark a turn in the letter. Paul has been showing that all people are guilty before God (Romans 1:18–3:20), and before he comes to justification by faith (Romans 3:21–5:21) he stops to say what Israel’s privileges really were.
The oracles of God were entrusted to Israel
Paul’s answer is wholehearted: “Much every way.” The Greek says “much, according to every way”, which means in every respect. Israel’s privileges were many, and Paul comes back to them later in the letter (Romans 9:4–5). “Chiefly” is prōton, “first” or “most importantly”, and with it Paul names the one privilege that stands above the rest: “unto them were committed the oracles of God.”
“Committed” translates pisteúō, the common verb for believing and trusting, which here has the sense of entrusting something to another’s care. God put his words into Israel’s keeping, and a trust of that kind carries the duty to guard those words, preserve them and live by them. “Oracles” is lógion, an utterance of God. The Greek Old Testament, the Septuagint, uses it for God’s commandments and messages, and Paul uses it here for the Scriptures of Israel, the Law, the Prophets and the Writings, which Jewish communities preserved and revered. Theós is the ordinary Greek word for a deity, and here it names the one true God of Israel. So the phrase “the oracles of God” tells us whose words the Old Testament Scriptures are. They are God’s own utterances, and they carry his authority and his truth.
Israel knew what a gift this was. Moses told the people that God was near to them and that their statutes were righteous as those of no other nation were (Deuteronomy 4:7–8). A psalm says that God gave his word and his statutes to Israel alone (Psalm 147:19–20), and Stephen speaks of Moses receiving the living oracles to pass on (Acts 7:38).
The gift was for the world’s sake as well as Israel’s. Through this people God prepared the way for the Messiah and for his truth to go out to every nation. Privilege also brought responsibility. Holding the Scriptures did not make Israel righteous, for “all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23), and the word that is heard has to be met with faith (Hebrews 4:2).
Can unbelief cancel God’s faithfulness?
God’s faithfulness stands whole, whatever people do with his word. Paul raises the question because the difficulty was real. Many in Israel had received God’s law and promises and had still failed to trust him, and in Paul’s own day many had turned away from Jesus the Messiah. The church at Rome held both Jewish and Gentile believers, and for them this was a pressing matter: had God’s promises to Abraham and to Israel come to an end?
“Did not believe” is apistéō, to be unbelieving, and by implication to disobey. “Unbelief” is the noun apistía, faithlessness. The failure Paul has in view is a failure to trust and obey what God had revealed. He says “some”, a portion of the people who had been given so much.
“The faith of God” (pistis theou) could by its grammar mean human faith in God. Set against “their unbelief”, it means God’s own faithfulness, his reliability in keeping his word. “Make without effect” is katargéō, to make idle, to render inoperative, to invalidate or abolish. So Paul is asking whether human faithlessness can put God’s faithfulness out of action. The Greek question is formed with the particle mē, which expects the answer “no”.
Scripture gives that answer everywhere. From the rebellion in Genesis 3 to Israel’s repeated turning away, people prove faithless and God remains who he is. “God is not a man, that he should lie” (Numbers 23:19). It is “impossible for God to lie” (Hebrews 6:18). When we are faithless he remains faithful, for “he cannot deny himself” (2 Timothy 2:13), and the psalmist sings of a faithfulness that endures (Psalm 89:1–2). If God’s faithfulness depended on ours, salvation would be a precarious thing. It rests on his character, and that is why it holds.
What “God forbid” means
Paul’s reply is mḗ genoito, “may it not be”. The verb is gínomai, to become or come to be, joined to the negative mḗ, so the phrase is a strong wish that such a thing should never come about. The KJV gives its force with “God forbid”. Paul uses it often to throw out a false conclusion that someone might draw from his teaching (Romans 6:2, Galatians 2:17), and he says it in verse 4 and again in verse 6.
What “every man a liar” means
“Let God be true” declares what God already is. “True” is alēthḗs, genuine and matching reality, a word said to come from a root meaning “not concealing”. God speaks truth, and he is himself the truth, wholly dependable and free of deceit. In Hebrew thought truth and lying reach past the accuracy of words to faithfulness and integrity of character. So “liar”, pseústēs, a falsifier, describes here the unreliability of fallen mankind before God. A psalm had already said it: “All men are liars” (Psalm 116:11). Paul means that all people have failed to be faithful to God and to live by his truth, and he goes on to prove it from Scripture (Romans 3:9–20). It does not mean that every person is lying every time he speaks. If it came to a choice between God’s word and the word of the whole human race, God would be the one telling the truth.
Why Paul quotes Psalm 51
The quotation is Psalm 51:4, in the wording of the Septuagint, the Greek translation widely used in the early church. In that psalm David confesses his sin and owns that God is right to condemn it. His confession justifies God’s “sayings”, his pronouncements, and shows God prevailing whenever his character and his acts are called into question. Paul’s point is that God’s truth is proved in his dealings with sinners. When people put God on trial, he comes out in the right.
Is God unjust to punish sin that shows up his righteousness?
God is righteous in all his judgments, and the fact that our sin displays his righteousness leaves that sin as guilty as it was before. The objection grows out of what Paul has just said. If God’s truth stands out against human falsehood, then “our unrighteousness”, adikía, injustice or wickedness, “commends” the righteousness of God. Synistáō means to set together, and so to exhibit or prove. A dark background makes a bright light stand out, and in the same way human sin makes God’s righteousness plain by contrast. Someone might then reason that God is unfair to punish the very sin that shows him to be righteous. “Vengeance” here is orgḗ, wrath, God’s just abhorrence of sin and the punishment that follows from it. It is the wrath that Paul has already said is revealed against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men (Romans 1:18).
Paul adds “(I speak as a man)” to mark the question as merely human reasoning, which he voices only in order to answer it. He uses similar words elsewhere when he argues from a human point of view (1 Corinthians 9:8, Galatians 3:15). The thought comes close to blasphemy, and Paul will leave nobody thinking that it is his own.
His answer is again “God forbid”, and his reason is short: “for then how shall God judge the world?” “Judge” is krínō, to distinguish and decide, and in a court to try, condemn and punish. “World” is kósmos, a word for an ordered arrangement that also means the world and the people in it, and here it is the whole human race. That God will judge the world was certain to Paul and to every reader of Israel’s Scriptures. Abraham asked, “Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?” (Genesis 18:25). The book of Job asks whether God perverts justice (Job 8:3). The psalmist says that “he shall judge the world in righteousness” (Psalm 9:7–8), and Paul told the Athenians that God has fixed a day for it (Acts 17:31). The objection proves too much. Every sin sets off God’s righteousness, so on this reasoning God could punish none of them, and the Judge of all the earth would have nobody left to judge. An argument that ends there has gone wrong, and Paul meets the same thought later in the letter when he asks whether there is unrighteousness with God (Romans 9:14).
God’s judgment flows from his holiness and justice. Because he judges, justice will prevail in the end, evil will be answered, and his standard of righteousness will stand over all that he has made.
Does our sin add to God’s glory?
God’s glory is perfect and complete in himself, and our sin can only show it up, as darkness shows up a light. Verse 7 puts the objection in the first person, which brings it close to home. “If” is ei, which sets up the supposed case. “The truth of God” is alḗtheia, here his faithfulness to his own character and promises. “My lie” is emós, “my”, with pseûsma, a falsehood, and it stands for human unfaithfulness of every kind. “Hath more abounded” is perisseúō, to overflow or be in excess. “Unto his glory” is eis, “to” or “into”, with dóxa, glory. The objector then asks why he is “yet”, éti, still, being “judged”, the same verb krínō as in verse 6, “as”, hōs, “a sinner”, hamartōlós. He is using the language of verse 4, where God is true and every man a liar, to argue his way out of judgment.
God’s truth is seen more clearly against the lie, and the lie adds nothing to it. Scripture does show God glorified through human sin. When Pharaoh pursued Israel into the sea, God gained honour over him, and the Egyptians learned that he is the LORD (Exodus 14:17–18). God is able to work all things together for good (Romans 8:28). His power to do this leaves the sinner fully answerable for the sin. The book of Job reminds us that God is beyond any harm our sins could do him (Job 35:6–8), and David, in the very psalm Paul has quoted, owns that his sin was against God and that God is just in judging it.
“Let us do evil, that good may come”
Verse 8 carries the objection to its end. If sin displays God’s glory, then why stop at excusing sin, and why not commit it on purpose so that good may result? Paul says that some people were reporting this as his own teaching. “Slanderously reported” is blasphēméō, to vilify or speak evil of someone. “Evil” is kakós, bad or evil, and here it is moral evil, set against “good”, agathós.
People said this of Paul because his gospel announced that a person is justified by faith apart from the works of the Law (Romans 3:21–28). That message was new and easily misunderstood, and some twisted it on purpose to discredit him. Paul met opposition and misrepresentation throughout his ministry. Among Greeks and Romans, moral teachers debated whether a good end could justify doubtful means. Paul treats the saying as a lie told about him and his fellow workers, and he refuses it any standing as a view worth weighing.
The error has a name, antinomianism, from the Greek anti, “against”, and nomos, “law”. It is the idea that grace frees the Christian from the moral law, so that conduct is of little account and sin can be done safely. Paul returns to it at length in Romans 6. There he writes, “What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?” (Romans 6:1–2). He writes to the Galatians, “For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another” (Galatians 5:13). Peter describes false teachers who use the same language: “While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage” (2 Peter 2:19).
“Whose damnation is just” is Paul’s verdict. “Damnation” is kríma, a judicial decision, a verdict or sentence, from the verb krínō. The sentence falls on those who reason this way, whether they are slandering the gospel with it or truly mean to sin for the sake of some good, and Paul calls it deserved. Grace changes people. It gives the power to live righteously, and so the gospel leads on to holiness.
How Christ answers these questions
Each question in this passage finds its full answer in Jesus Christ.
The oracles entrusted to Israel speak of him. Jesus said that everything written about him in the law of Moses, the prophets and the psalms had to be fulfilled (Luke 24:44), and that he came to fulfil the law and the prophets (Matthew 5:17). He is himself the Word (John 1:1), and the God who spoke by the prophets has now spoken to us by his Son (Hebrews 1:1–2). Through him the word once kept by one nation goes out to all, since the gospel is God’s power for salvation to everyone who believes, the Jew and the Gentile alike (Romans 1:16). So the lasting advantage for any person is found in him. Christ is the end of the law for those who believe (Romans 10:4), the blessing of Abraham reaches the Gentiles through him (Galatians 3:14), God’s love for the world is given in him (John 3:16), and Christ is “all, and in all” (Colossians 3:11).
God’s faithfulness is proved in him. The promise first given in Genesis 3:15 and repeated through the covenants has its Yes and its Amen in Christ (2 Corinthians 1:20). Human unbelief went as far as crucifying the Son of God, and God answered by raising him from the dead. In the death of Christ for us God showed his love (Romans 5:8). Where every man is a liar, Jesus is “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6), the one man whose life was perfectly true and faithful.
God’s justice is upheld in him. Jesus is the Judge of the world, for “the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son” (John 5:22). He is also “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). On the cross the wrath due to human unrighteousness fell on him, for God “made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him” (2 Corinthians 5:21). God set him forth as a propitiation through his blood, so that God is both just and the justifier of the one who believes in Jesus (Romans 3:25–26). God judges sin fully and forgives sinners freely, and his righteousness is whole in both.
And grace in Christ makes sin hateful to those who receive it. They walk in newness of life (Romans 6:4), count themselves dead to sin and alive to God (Romans 6:11), and are being changed into his image (2 Corinthians 3:18).
What a faithful God and an entrusted word give us
We hold the whole of Scripture, a privilege like Israel’s that carries the same weight of responsibility. These verses ask where our confidence before God rests. Heritage, baptism, church attendance and an upright life are good things, and our standing with God rests on Christ alone.
Our assurance rests on God’s faithfulness, which holds when our own faith is weak. In a world of broken promises, God keeps his. When others around us disbelieve, and when we find doubt in ourselves, his word is as true as it was before.
The passage also closes the door on excuses. It is a real temptation to think that a sin matters less because God brought some good out of it, or because grace will cover it. Paul gives that thought its true name. God will judge the world in righteousness, and the same God has given his Son so that sinners can stand before him forgiven and be made new.
Romans 3:1
“What advantage then hath the Jew?”
“Then” (oûn) draws the question out of chapter 2. “Advantage” (perissós) asks whether the Jew has anything over and above the Gentile. Paul asks it on behalf of a Jewish reader, and he is himself a Jew.
“or what profit is there of circumcision?”
“Profit” (ōphéleia) is practical benefit. If true circumcision is of the heart, what use was the rite (peritomḗ) that sealed God’s covenant with Abraham? Paul answers in the next verse.
Romans 3:2 This verse
“Much every way:”
A full yes. The advantage is great in every respect, so chapter 2 took nothing away from the worth of God’s gifts to Israel.
“chiefly,”
Prōton, “first”. Paul names the privilege that matters most and leaves the rest for later in the letter.
“because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.”
“Committed” (pisteúō) means entrusted. The “oracles” (lógion) are the utterances of God (theós), the Old Testament Scriptures, which Israel was given to guard, preserve and obey.
Romans 3:3
“For what if some did not believe?”
“Some” is a portion of the people who held the oracles. Apistéō is to be unbelieving, a failure of trust and obedience.
“shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?”
“Their unbelief” (apistía) is set against “the faith of God”, which is God’s own faithfulness. Katargéō is to make idle or invalidate, and the question is worded to expect the answer “no”.
Romans 3:4
“God forbid:”
Mḗ genoito, “may it not be”, with the verb gínomai. Paul recoils from the very idea.
“yea, let God be true, but every man a liar;”
God is alēthḗs, true and dependable. Every man is a pseústēs in the sense that all have been unfaithful to him. God’s truth would stand even if the whole human race contradicted him.
“as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.”
David’s confession from Psalm 51, in its Greek wording. A sinner who admits his guilt shows that God’s verdict was right, and God prevails whenever his ways are questioned.
Romans 3:5
“But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God,”
The supposed case. Our adikía shows up (synistáō) God’s righteousness by contrast.
“what shall we say?”
Paul stops to ask what conclusion follows, as he often does before meeting an objection.
“Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance?”
“Vengeance” is orgḗ, God’s wrath against sin. The question asks whether punishing useful sin would be unfair.
“(I speak as a man)”
Paul marks the question as human reasoning that he is reporting and will refute.
Romans 3:6
“God forbid:”
The same strong rejection as in verse 4.
“for then how shall God judge the world?”
God will judge (krínō) the whole human race (kósmos), and he will do it justly. Any reasoning that would make that judgment unjust is false from the start.
Romans 3:7
“For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory;”
The objection in the first person. God’s alḗtheia is said to overflow (perisseúō) through “my lie” (emós, pseûsma), to (eis) his glory (dóxa). The “if” is ei.
“why yet am I also judged as a sinner?”
“Yet” is éti, “still”, and “as a sinner” is hōs with hamartōlós. The answer is that he is judged because he sinned. The good God brings out of it is God’s doing and earns the sinner nothing.
Romans 3:8
“And not rather,”
Paul pushes the objector’s logic to its last step before he condemns it.
“(as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,)”
Blasphēméō, to speak evil of. People were truly saying this about Paul and his fellow workers, and he puts on record that it is false.
“Let us do evil, that good may come?”
The slander itself. “Evil” is kakós, moral wrong, done on purpose for the sake of a good result. Romans 6 answers it in full.
“whose damnation is just.”
Kríma is a verdict or sentence. Paul says that God’s sentence on those who reason like this is deserved.
Last revised