Skip to content
“God's Impartial Judgment of Moralizers”· Romans 2:1–5
Translation
King James Version
And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 thinkest thou G3049 this G5124, O G5599 man G444, that judgest G2919 them which do G4238 such things G5108, and G2532 doest G4160 the same G846, that G3754 thou G4771 shalt escape G1628 the judgment G2917 of God G2316?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
do you think that you, a mere man passing judgment on others who do such things, yet doing them yourself, will escape the judgment of God?
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So when you, O man, pass judgment on others, yet do the same things, do you think you will escape God’s judgment?
Ask
American Standard Version
And reckonest thou this, O man, who judgest them that practise such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Do you think this, O man who judges those who practice such things, and do the same, that you will escape the judgment of God?
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And thinkest thou this, O thou man, that condemnest them which doe such thinges, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the iudgement of God?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And dost thou think this, O man, who art judging those who such things are practising, and art doing them, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 27,966 of 31,102 · 89.9%

Study This Verse

Summary

Romans 2:3 delivers a penetrating rhetorical question, directly challenging the self-righteous individual who condemns others for sins they themselves commit. Paul exposes the profound hypocrisy of such a stance, asserting that no one, regardless of their perceived moral superiority or outward judgment of others, can evade the righteous and impartial judgment of God. This verse serves as a stark warning that attempting to escape divine scrutiny through condemnation of others is a deluded and futile endeavor, setting the stage for Paul's broader argument that all humanity stands guilty before God.

Context

Literary Context

Romans 2:3 is a pivotal verse within Paul's broader argument concerning universal human sinfulness and the necessity of God's righteousness revealed in the gospel. Following his indictment of Gentile idolatry and immorality in Romans 1:18-32, Paul pivots sharply in Romans 2:1 to address those—often understood to be primarily Jewish people or morally upright Gentiles—who judge others while committing similar offenses. This verse specifically targets the flawed reasoning of such a person, directly questioning their assumption of immunity from divine judgment. It sets the stage for Paul's subsequent exposition on God's impartial judgment based on truth, not outward appearance or heritage, culminating in the declaration that all, both Jew and Gentile, are under sin in Romans 3:9-20.

Historical & Cultural Context

First-century Roman society, though diverse, often saw a clear distinction between various moral codes and religious practices. Jewish people, in particular, held a strong sense of moral superiority due to their possession of the Law and the covenant with God. There was a prevailing tendency to condemn the "pagan" practices of the Gentiles, while perhaps overlooking or rationalizing their own moral failings. Paul's challenge in Romans 2 directly confronts this cultural and religious self-assurance. He dismantles the idea that adherence to a particular law or tradition, or even the act of judging others, could somehow exempt one from the universal standard of God's righteousness. The concept of divine judgment was well-understood in both Jewish and Greco-Roman thought, but Paul redefines its scope and impartiality, asserting that God judges all according to truth, not according to human distinctions or outward appearances.

Key Themes

This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Romans. The primary theme is God's Impartial Judgment, emphasizing that God's justice is applied universally and without favoritism, regardless of one's background or perceived moral standing (Romans 2:11). Closely related is the theme of Hypocrisy, as Paul exposes the inconsistency of condemning others for sins one also practices (Matthew 7:1-5). The verse also reinforces the theme of Universal Sinfulness, laying the groundwork for Paul's argument that all humanity, Jew and Gentile alike, is in need of God's grace and righteousness, as no one can truly escape the consequences of their own sin through self-righteousness or judging others (Romans 3:23). It underscores the Futility of Self-Righteousness, demonstrating that human attempts at establishing one's own righteousness apart from God's provision are ultimately vain.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

thinkest thou logízomai' G3049

This word, derived from G3049, means "to take an inventory, i.e., estimate (literally or figuratively)." In this context, it highlights a flawed calculation or presumption on the part of the judging individual. It implies a deluded reasoning, a false conclusion drawn from an incorrect premise that their judgment of others somehow exempts them from God's scrutiny.

judgest krínō' G2919

This verb means "to distinguish, i.e., decide (mentally or judicially); by implication, to try, condemn, punish." Here, it refers to the act of passing moral judgment or condemnation upon others. The use of this word directly links the human act of judging to the divine act of judgment, creating a stark parallel that underpins Paul's argument.

escape ekpheúgō' G1628

Derived from G1628, meaning "to flee out." This term vividly portrays the vain hope of the hypocritical judge. It suggests an attempt to run away from, avoid, or get out of the inevitable divine reckoning. Paul's rhetorical question underscores that such an escape is utterly impossible when confronted with the omniscient and righteous judgment of God.

Verse Breakdown

"And thinkest thou this, O man"

Paul directly addresses the individual, using a rhetorical question to challenge their underlying assumption. The phrase "O man" (ὦ ἄνθρωπε) is a general address, yet it carries a tone of incredulity and direct confrontation, highlighting the absurdity of the thought being entertained.

"that judgest them which do such things"

This clause identifies the specific action of the addressed individual: they are passing judgment on others who engage in the very sins Paul has just described in Romans 1. This establishes the context of their self-righteous condemnation.

"and doest the same"

This is the critical pivot, exposing the hypocrisy. The judging individual is not merely observing or discerning; they are actively participating in the very "such things" they condemn in others. This creates a profound moral contradiction.

"that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?"

This is the core of the rhetorical question, revealing the deluded expectation of the hypocrite. The implied answer is a resounding "No!" It emphasizes the certainty and inescapability of God's judgment for all who practice sin, regardless of their outward condemnations of others.

Literary Devices

Romans 2:3 is masterfully crafted using several powerful literary devices. The most prominent is the Rhetorical Question, "And thinkest thou this, O man... that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?" This question is not posed to elicit information but to make a forceful assertion, compelling the reader to confront the logical absurdity of the hypocrite's position and to draw the obvious conclusion that escape is impossible. There is also a strong element of Irony, as the very act of judging others, which might be perceived as a sign of righteousness, is revealed to be a damning indictment of the judge themselves when they are guilty of the same offenses. This ironic twist underscores the futility of self-righteousness. Furthermore, Paul employs Direct Address ("O man") to create an immediate and personal challenge, pulling the reader directly into the argument and forcing self-examination. The Juxtaposition of judging others versus doing the same highlights the glaring inconsistency and moral bankruptcy of the hypocrite, making the argument against their self-deception undeniably clear.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Romans 2:3 profoundly underscores the universal reach of God's righteous judgment and the futility of human hypocrisy. It dismantles any notion that one can earn favor or escape divine scrutiny by merely condemning the sins of others while indulging in similar transgressions. Theologically, this verse establishes a crucial foundation for Paul's argument that all humanity, Jew and Gentile alike, is "under sin" (Romans 3:9) and therefore in desperate need of God's grace and the righteousness provided through faith in Christ. It highlights God's impartiality, demonstrating that He judges according to truth and deeds, not according to external religious affiliation or self-proclaimed moral superiority. This verse serves as a sober reminder that true righteousness comes from an inward transformation and alignment with God's will, not from outward condemnation.

Reflection and Application

Romans 2:3 is a piercing mirror held up to the human heart, exposing the insidious nature of self-righteousness and hypocrisy. It challenges us to look inward with brutal honesty before daring to cast judgment outward. The person who condemns others for their faults while harboring similar sins within their own life is operating under a dangerous delusion, believing they can somehow escape God's righteous judgment by pointing fingers. This verse calls us to a profound humility, reminding us that our own sinfulness is just as real and just as deserving of God's judgment as anyone else's. Instead of focusing on the speck in our brother's eye, we are called to first examine the log in our own, recognizing our desperate need for God's mercy and grace. True spiritual maturity is marked not by a critical spirit towards others, but by a contrite heart before God, acknowledging our own fallenness and embracing the transformative power of the Gospel. It compels us to live lives of integrity, where our outward pronouncements align with our inward practices, reflecting the character of the God who is both just and merciful.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what areas of my life might I be quick to judge others, while perhaps overlooking similar faults in myself?
  2. How does my understanding of God's impartial judgment impact my view of myself and others?
  3. What steps can I take to cultivate a spirit of humility and self-examination, rather than self-righteousness?
  4. How does the realization that I cannot escape God's judgment lead me to repentance and reliance on His grace?

FAQ

Does this verse mean we should never judge anyone?

Romans 2:3, alongside other passages like Matthew 7:1-5, does not prohibit all forms of discernment or evaluation. Rather, it condemns hypocritical judgment – judging others for sins that one is also committing, or judging with a self-righteous attitude that assumes one's own immunity from God's standard. The Bible encourages believers to exercise wise discernment (e.g., 1 Corinthians 5:12), but this must always be done with humility, self-awareness, and a recognition of one's own fallibility and need for grace. The focus is on the spirit of judgment: whether it stems from pride and hypocrisy, or from a desire for truth and restoration, born out of love and humility.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Romans 2:3, by exposing the futility of human self-righteousness and the inescapability of God's judgment, powerfully sets the stage for the necessity of Christ. The "man" who judges others while doing the same is trapped in a cycle of condemnation, unable to escape the divine reckoning by his own efforts. This highlights humanity's universal predicament: all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23). Jesus Christ, however, perfectly fulfilled the Law and lived a sinless life, becoming the only one truly qualified to judge. Yet, in His boundless love, He did not come to condemn the world, but to save it (John 3:17). He bore the judgment that we deserved, becoming sin for us so that in Him we might become the righteousness of God (2 Corinthians 5:21). Thus, for those who are "in Christ," there is no condemnation (Romans 8:1), not because they have escaped judgment by their own merit or by judging others, but because Christ Himself has absorbed that judgment on the cross. Our escape from judgment is found not in our own works or self-righteousness, but solely in the perfect work of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Romans 2:1–16. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 16 verses
Passage under commentRomans 2:1–16
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

In the former chapter the apostle had represented the state of the Gentile world to be as bad and black as the Jews were ready enough to pronounce it. And now, designing to show that the state of the Jews was very bad too, and their sin in many respects more aggravated, to prepare his way he sets himself in this part of the chapter to show that God would proceed upon equal terms of justice with Jews and Gentiles; and now with such a partial hand as the Jews were apt to think he would use in their favour.

I.He arraigns them for their censoriousness and self-conceit (Rom 2:1):

Thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest. As he expresses himself in general terms, the admonition may reach those many masters (Jam 3:1), of whatever nation or profession they are, that assume to themselves a power to censure, control, and condemn others. But he intends especially the Jews, and to them particularly he applies this general charge (Rom 2:21), Thou who teachest another teachest thou not thyself? The Jews were generally a proud sort of people, that looked with a great deal of scorn and contempt upon the poor Gentiles, as not worthy to be set with the dogs of their flock; while in the mean time they were themselves as bad and immoral - though not idolaters, as the Gentiles, yet sacrilegious, Rom 2:22. Therefore thou art inexcusable. If the Gentiles, who had but the light of nature, were inexcusable (Rom 1:20), much more the Jews, who had the light of the law, the revealed will of God, and so had greater helps than the Gentiles.

II.He asserts the invariable justice of the divine government, Rom 2:2, Rom 2:3.

To drive home the conviction, he here shows what a righteous God that is with whom we have to do, and how just in his proceedings. It is usual with the apostle Paul, in his writings, upon mention of some material point, to make large digressions upon it; as here concerning the justice of God (Rom 2:2), That the judgment of God is according to truth, - according to the eternal rules of justice and equity, - according to the heart, and not according to the outward appearance (Sa1 16:7), - according to the works, and not with respect to persons, is a doctrine which we are all sure of, for he would not be God if he were not just; but it behoves those especially to consider it who condemn others for those things which they themselves are guilty of, and so, while they practise sin and persist in that practice, think to bribe the divine justice by protesting against sin and exclaiming loudly upon others that are guilty, as if preaching against sin would atone for the guilt of it. But observe how he puts it to the sinner's conscience (Rom 2:3): Thinkest thou this, O man? O man, a rational creature, a dependent creature, made by God, subject under him, and accountable to him. The case is so plain that we may venture to appeal to the sinner's own thoughts: "Canst thou think that thou shalt escape the judgment of God? Can the heart-searching God be imposed upon by formal pretences, the righteous Judge of all so bribed and put off?" The most plausible politic sinners, who acquit themselves before men with the greatest confidence, cannot escape the judgment of God, cannot avoid being judged and condemned.

III.He draws up a charge against them (Rom 2:4, Rom 2:5) consisting of two branches: -

1.Slighting the goodness of God (Rom 2:4), the riches of his goodness. This is especially applicable to the Jews, who had singular tokens of the divine favour. Means are mercies, and the more light we sin against the more love we sin against. Low and mean thoughts of the divine goodness are at the bottom of a great deal of sin. There is in every wilful sin an interpretative contempt of the goodness of God; it is spurning at his bowels, particularly the goodness of his patience, his forbearance and long-suffering, taking occasion thence to be so much the more bold in sin, Ecc 8:11. Not knowing, that is, not considering, not knowing practically and with application, that the goodness of God leadeth thee, the design of it is to lead thee, to repentance. It is not enough for us to know that God's goodness leads to repentance, but we must know that it leads us - thee in particular. See here what method God takes to bring sinners to repentance. He leads them, not drives them like beasts, but leads them like rational creatures, allures them (Hos 2:14); and it is goodness that leads, bands of love, Hos 11:4. Compare Jer 31:3. The consideration of the goodness of God, his common goodness to all (the goodness of his providence, of his patience, and of his offers), should be effectual to bring us all to repentance; and the reason why so many continue in impenitency is because they do not know and consider this.

2.Provoking the wrath of God, Rom 2:5. The rise of this provocation is a hard and impenitent heart; and the ruin of sinners is their walking after such a heart, being led by it. To sin is to walk in the way of the heart; and when that is a hard and impenitent heart (contracted hardness by long custom, besides that which is natural), how desperate must the course needs be! The provocation is expressed by treasuring up wrath. Those that go on in a course of sin are treasuring up unto themselves wrath. A treasure denotes abundance. It is a treasure that will be spending to eternity, and yet never exhausted; and yet sinners are still adding to it as to a treasure. Every wilful sin adds to the score, and will inflame the reckoning; it brings a branch to their wrath, as some read that (Eze 8:17), they put the branch to their nose. A treasure denotes secrecy. The treasury or magazine of wrath is the heart of God himself, in which it lies hid, as treasures in some secret place sealed up; see Deu 32:34; Job 14:17. But withal it denotes reservation to some further occasion; as the treasures of the hail are reserved against the day of battle and war, Job 38:22, Job 38:23. These treasures will be broken open like the fountains of the great deep, Gen 7:11. They are treasured up against the day of wrath, when they will be dispensed by the wholesale, poured out by full vials. Though the present day be a day of patience and forbearance towards sinners, yet there is a day of wrath coming-wrath, and nothing but wrath. Indeed, every day is to sinners a day of wrath, for God is angry with the wicked every day (Psa 7:11), but there is the great day of wrath coming, Rev 6:17. And that day of wrath will be the day of the revelation of the righteous judgment of God. The wrath of God is not like our wrath, a heat and passion; no, fury is not in him (Isa 27:4): but it is a righteous judgment, his will to punish sin, because he hates it as contrary to his nature. This righteous judgment of God is now many times concealed in the prosperity and success of sinners, but shortly it will be manifested before all the world, these seeming disorders set to rights, and the heavens shall declare his righteousness, Psa 50:6. Therefore judge nothing before the time.

IV.He describes the measures by which God proceeds in his judgment.

Having mentioned the righteous judgment of God in Rom 2:5, he here illustrates that judgment, and the righteousness of it, and shows what we may expect from God, and by what rule he will judge the world. The equity of distributive justice is the dispensing of frowns and favours with respect to deserts and without respect to persons: such is the righteous judgment of God.

1.He will render to every man according to his deeds (Rom 2:6), a truth often mentioned in scripture, to prove that the Judge of all the earth does right.

(1.)In dispensing his favours; and this is mentioned twice here, both in Rom 2:7 and Rom 2:10. For he delights to show mercy. Observe,

[1.]The objects of his favour: Those who by patient continuance, etc. By this we may try our interest in the divine favour, and may hence be directed what course to take, that we may obtain it. Those whom the righteous God will reward are, First, Such as fix to themselves the right end, that seek for glory, and honour, and immortality; that is, the glory and honour which are immortal - acceptance with God here and for ever. There is a holy ambition which is at the bottom of all practical religion. This is seeking the kingdom of God, looking in our desires and aims as high as heaven, and resolved to take up with nothing short of it. This seeking implies a loss, sense of that loss, desire to retrieve it, and pursuits and endeavours consonant to those desires. Secondly, Such as, having fixed the right end, adhere to the right way: A patient continuance in well-doing. 1. There must be well-doing, working good, Rom 2:10. It is not enough to know well, and speak well, and profess well, and promise well, but we must do well: do that which is good, not only for the matter of it, but for the manner of it. We must do it well. 2. A continuance in well-doing. Not for a fit and a start, like the morning cloud and the early dew; but we must endure to the end: it is perseverance that wins the crown. 3. A patient continuance. This patience respects not only the length of the work, but the difficulties of it and the oppositions and hardships we may meet with in it. Those that will do well and continue in it must put on a great deal of patience.

[2.]The product of his favour. He will render to such eternal life. Heaven is life, eternal life, and it is the reward of those that patiently continue in well-doing; and it is called (Rom 2:10) glory, honour, and peace. Those that seek for glory and honour (Rom 2:7) shall have them. Those that seek for the vain glory and honour of this world often miss of them, and are disappointed; but those that seek for immortal glory and honour shall have them, and not only glory and honour, but peace. Worldly glory and honour are commonly attended with trouble; but heavenly glory and honour have peace with them, undisturbed everlasting peace.

(2.)In dispensing his frowns (Rom 2:8, Rom 2:9). Observe,

[1.]The objects of his frowns. In general those that do evil, more particularly described to be such as are contentious and do not obey the truth. Contentious against God. every wilful sin is a quarrel with God, it is striving with our Maker (Isa 45:9), the most desperate contention. The Spirit of God strives with sinners (Gen 6:3), and impenitent sinners strive against the Spirit, rebel against the light (Job 24:13), hold fast deceit, strive to retain that sin which the Spirit strives to part them from. Contentious, and do not obey the truth. The truths of religion are not only to be known, but to be obeyed; they are directing, ruling, commanding; truths relating to practice. Disobedience to the truth is interpreted a striving against it. But obey unrighteousness - do what unrighteousness bids them do. Those that refuse to be the servants of truth will soon be the slaves of unrighteousness.

[2.]The products or instances of these frowns: Indignation and wrath, tribulation and anguish. These are the wages of sin. Indignation and wrath the causes - tribulation and anguish the necessary and unavoidable effects. And this upon the soul; souls are the vessels of that wrath, the subjects of that tribulation and anguish. Sin qualifies the soul for this wrath. The soul is that in or of man which is alone immediately capable of this indignation, and the impressions or effects of anguish therefrom. Hell is eternal tribulation and anguish, the product of wrath and indignation. This comes of contending with God, of setting briers and thorns before a consuming fire, Isa 27:4. Those that will not bow to his golden sceptre will certainly be broken by his iron rod. Thus will God render to every man according to his deeds.

2.There is no respect of persons with God, Rom 2:11. As to the spiritual state, there is a respect of persons; but not as to outward relation or condition. Jews and Gentiles stand upon the same level before God. This was Peter's remark upon the first taking down of the partition-wall (Act 10:34), that God is no respecter of persons; and it is explained in the next words, that in every nation he that fears God, and works righteousness, is accepted of him. God does not save men with respect to their external privileges or their barren knowledge and profession of the truth, but according as their state and disposition really are. In dispensing both his frowns and favours it is both to Jew and Gentile. If to the Jews first, who had greater privileges, and made a greater profession, yet also to the Gentiles, whose want of such privileges will neither excuse them from the punishment of their ill-doing nor bar them out from the reward of their well-doing (see Col 3:11); for shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?

V.He proves the equity of his proceedings with all, when he shall actually come to Judge them (Rom 2:12-16), upon this principle, that that which is the rule of man's obedience is the rule of God's judgment. Three degrees of light are revealed to the children of men: -

1.The light of nature. This the Gentiles have, and by this they shall be judged: As many as have sinned without law shall perish without law; that is, the unbelieving Gentiles, who had no other guide but natural conscience, no other motive but common mercies, and had not the law of Moses nor any supernatural revelation, shall not be reckoned with for the transgression of the law they never had, nor come under the aggravation of the Jews' sin against and judgment by the written law; but they shall be judged by, as they sin against, the law of nature, not only as it is in their hearts, corrupted, defaced, and imprisoned in unrighteousness, but as in the uncorrupt original the Judge keeps by him. Further to clear this (Rom 2:14, Rom 2:15), in a parenthesis, he evinces that the light of nature was to the Gentiles instead of a written law. He had said (Rom 2:12) they had sinned without law, which looks like a contradiction; for where there is no law there is no transgression. But, says he, though they had not the written law (Psa 147:20), they had that which was equivalent, not to the ceremonial, but to the moral law. They had the work of the law. He does not mean that work which the law commands, as if they could produce a perfect obedience; but that work which the law does. The work of the law is to direct us what to do, and to examine us what we have done. Now,

(1.)They had that which directed them what to do by the light of nature: by the force and tendency of their natural notions and dictates they apprehended a clear and vast difference between good and evil. They did by nature the things contained in the law. They had a sense of justice and equity, honour and purity, love and charity; the light of nature taught obedience to parents, pity to the miserable, conservation of public peace and order, forbade murder, stealing, lying, perjury, etc. Thus they were a law unto themselves.

(2.)They had that which examined them as to what they had done: Their conscience also bearing witness. They had that within them which approved and commended what was well done and which reproached them for what was done amiss. Conscience is a witness, and first or last will bear witness, though for a time it may be bribed or brow-beaten. It is instead of a thousand witnesses, testifying of that which is most secret; and their thoughts accusing or excusing, passing a judgment upon the testimony of conscience by applying the law to the fact. Conscience is that candle of the Lord which was not quite put out, no, not in the Gentile world. The heathen have witnessed to the comfort of a good conscience.

- Hic murus aheneus esto,

Nil conscire sibi -

Be this thy brazen bulwark of defence,

Still to preserve thy conscious innocence.

- Hor.

and to the terror of a bad one:

- Quos diri conseia facti

Mens habet attonitos, et surdo verbere caedit -

No lash is heard, and yet the guilty heart

Is tortur'd with a self-inflicted smart

- Juv. Sat. 13.

Their thoughts the meanwhile, metaxu allēlōn - among themselves, or one with another. The same light and law of nature that witnesses against sin in them, and witnessed against it in others, accused or excused one another. Vicissim, so some read it, by turns; according as they observed or broke these natural laws and dictates, their consciences did either acquit or condemn them. All this did evince that they had that which was to them instead of a law, which they might have been governed by, and which will condemn them, because they were not so guided and governed by it. So that the guilty Gentiles are left without excuse. God is justified in condemning them. They cannot plead ignorance, and therefore are likely to perish if they have not something else to plead.

2.The light of the law. This the Jews had, and by this they shall be judged (Rom 2:12): As many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law. They sinned, not only having the law, but en nomō - in the law, in the midst of so much law, in the face and light of so pure and clear a law, the directions of which were so very full and particular, and the sanctions of it so very cogent and enforcing. These shall be judged by the law; their punishment shall be, as their sin is, so much the greater for their having the law. The Jew first, Rom 2:9. It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon. Thus Moses did accuse them (Joh 5:45), and they fell under the many stripes of him that knew his master's will, and did it not, Luk 12:47. The Jews prided themselves very much in the law; but, to confirm what he had said, the apostle shows (Rom 2:13) that their having, and hearing, and knowing the law, would not justify them, but their doing it. The Jewish doctors bolstered up their followers with an opinion that all that were Jews, how bad soever they lived, should have a place in the world to come. This the apostle here opposes: it was a great privilege that they had the law, but not a saving privilege, unless they lived up to the law they had, which it is certain the Jews did not, and therefore they had need of a righteousness wherein to appear before God. We may apply it to the gospel: it is not hearing, but doing that will save us, Joh 13:17; Jam 1:22.

3.The light of the gospel: and according to this those that enjoyed the gospel shall be judge (Rom 2:16): According to my gospel; not meant of any fifth gospel written by Paul, as some conceit; or of the gospel written by Luke, as Paul's amanuensis (Euseb. Hist. lib 3, cap. 8), but the gospel in general, called Paul's because he was a preacher of it. As many as are under that dispensation shall be judged according to that dispensation, Mar 16:16. Some refer those words, according to my gospel, to what he says of the day of judgment: "There will come a day of judgment, according as I have in my preaching often told you; and that will be the day of the final judgment both of Jews and Gentiles." It is good for us to get acquainted with what is revealed concerning that day.

(1.)There is a day set for a general judgment. The day, the great day, his day that is coming, Psa 37:13.

(2.)The judgment of that day will be put into the hands of Jesus Christ. God shall judge by Jesus Christ, Act 17:31. It will be part of the reward of his humiliation. Nothing speaks more terror to sinners, or more comfort to saints, than this, that Christ shall be the Judge.

(3.)The secrets of men shall then be judged. Secret services shall be then rewarded, secret sins shall be then punished, hidden things shall be brought to light. That will be the great discovering day, when that which is now done in corners shall be proclaimed to all the world.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

4 quotes · AD 253–430
Ante-NicenePost-Nicene
300400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

For this reason it is right for each person to examine his own conscience first and then debate the deeds of the person whom he is judging. If this were to happen, all desire for high ecclesiastical office would vanish from those appointed to it, if those who want to preside over the people were more concerned to judge themselves than to judge others.No one should imagine that he can escape the judgment of God, as the prophet also says: “Whither shall I go from thy Spirit? Or whither shall I flee from thy presence?” These things apply most of all to those who preside over the judgment of the people. Scripture also says elsewhere that “judgment will begin at the house of God.” … Therefore judgment begins with the children of God first of all, for God chastises everyone whom he accepts into the number of his children. Indeed, I think that even if it were possible, nobody should try to escape God’s judgment, for not to come to God’s judgment is not to come to improvement, to health or to a cure.
AD 384AmbrosiasterPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES
Paul does not want them to hope that they can be pardoned, since that would be unjust, when they have been given the ability to judge evil and wrongdoing and to avoid it. If they cannot manage to avoid it in this life, they will not be able to escape the judgment of God in the future. For God, with whom there is neither flattery nor respect of persons, will judge them on his own authority.If someone thinks he ought to be immune from such punishment, let him say so. But if it is right that he should not escape, let him trust that God will judge and judge rightly, and that God, the Creator of the world, will offer proper attention and care to his creation. If God had made the world and then neglected it, he would be called a bad Creator, because he would be demonstrating by his neglect that what he had made was not good. But since it cannot be denied that God made good things—for it is unworthy and impossible for one who is good to make evil things—it is necessary to say that he is concerned about them. It would be a crime and a reproach to him if he were to neglect the good things which he had made. Life itself is governed by his servants the natural elements, who act according to his pleasure and plan, as the Lord himself says: “he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.” Therefore, if he does all that, will he not take care to look after what he has made, so as to reward those who love him and condemn those who reject him?
AD 407John ChrysostomPost-NiceneSourceHomily on Romans 5
"And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest those which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?" For since he had shown the sin of the world to be great, from its doctrines, from its doings, and that they did yet sin though wise, and though they had the creation to lead them by the hand, and not by leaving God only, but also by choosing the images of creeping things, and by their dishonoring virtue, and deserting, in spite of nature's drawings back, to the service of vice even contrary to nature: he goes on next to show, that they who do such things are punished too. He did indeed at once point out a punishment by mentioning their very practice. For "they received," he says, "in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet." But as they do not perceive that, he mentions another also, which they stood most in fear of. For if the Gentile be on this score inexcusable, because, when the creation led him on and his own reasonings, he yet did not amend, much more were the Jew so, who besides these had the teaching of the Law also. Having then persuaded him to a ready admission of these reasonings, in the case of other men's sins, he now compels him even against his will to do so in the case of his own. And in order that what he says may be more readily allowed, he leads him forward with the better things also in view. Thou hast not been acquitted of thine own judgment, and wilt thou escape through God's? Who indeed would say this? And yet thou hast judged thyself. But since the rigorousness of the judgment-court was such, and thou wert not able to spare even thyself, how should not God, that cannot do amiss, and who is in the highest sense just, be much surer to do the same? But hast thou condemned thyself, and is God to approve of thee and praise thee? And how can this be reasonable?
AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourceLETTER 153
Is the fact that some persist in their wickedness any proof that God does not persist in his patience, punishing very few sins in this world, lest we fail to believe in his divine providence and, saving many for the last judgment, to justify his future decree?
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Romans 2:3 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.