Skip to content

Romans 2:1

“God's Impartial Judgment of Moralizers”Romans 2:1–5
King James Version
Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
Therefore G1352 thou art G1488 inexcusable G379, O G5599 man G444, whosoever G3956 thou art that judgest G2919: for G1063 wherein G1722 G3739 thou judgest G2919 another G2087, thou condemnest G2632 thyself G4572; for G1063 thou that judgest G2919 doest G4238 the same things G846.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on another. For on whatever grounds you judge the other, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
Wherefore thou art without excuse, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest dost practise the same things.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
Therefore you are without excuse, O man, whoever you are who judge. For in that which you judge another, you condemn yourself. For you who judge practice the same things.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoeuer thou art that condemnest: for in that that thou condemnest another, thou condemnest thy selfe: for thou that condemnest, doest the same things.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
Therefore, thou art inexcusable, O man--every one who is judging--for in that in which thou dost judge the other, thyself thou dost condemn, for the same things thou dost practise who art judging,

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
22 Greek words
  1. ΔιὸDioThereforeG1352CONJConjunction
  2. ἀναπολόγητοςanapologētosinexcusableG379A-NSMAdjective Nominative Singular Masculine
  3. εἶeiyou areG1510V-PAI-2SVerb Present Active Indicative 2nd Singular
  4. ὦōOG5599INJInterjection
  5. ἄνθρωπεanthrōpemanG444N-VSMNoun Vocative Singular Masculine
  6. πᾶςpaseveryoneG3956A-VSMAdjective Vocative Singular Masculine
  7. ὁhoyou who [are]G3588T-VSMDefinite article Vocative Singular Masculine
  8. κρίνων·krinōnjudgingG2919V-PAP-VSMVerb Present Active Participle Vocative Singular Masculine
  9. ἐνenInG1722PREPPreposition
  10. ᾧhōthat whichG3739R-DSNRelative pronoun Dative Singular Neuter
  11. γὰρgarforG1063CONJConjunction
  12. κρίνειςkrineisyou judgeG2919V-PAI-2SVerb Present Active Indicative 2nd Singular
  13. τὸνtontheG3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
  14. ἕτερονheteronotherG2087A-ASMAdjective Accusative Singular Masculine
  15. σεαυτὸνseautonyourselfG4771F-2ASMReflexive pronoun Accusative 2nd Singular Masculine
  16. κατακρίνεις·katakrineisyou are condemningG2632V-PAI-2SVerb Present Active Indicative 2nd Singular
  17. τὰta[the]G3588T-APNDefinite article Accusative Plural Neuter
  18. γὰρgarforG1063CONJConjunction
  19. αὐτὰautathe same thingsG846P-APNPersonal pronoun Accusative Plural Neuter
  20. πράσσειςprasseisyou doG4238V-PAI-2SVerb Present Active Indicative 2nd Singular
  21. ὁhowhoG3588T-NSMDefinite article Nominative Singular Masculine
  22. κρίνωνkrinōnare judgingG2919V-PAP-NSMVerb Present Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 27,964 of 31,102 · 89.9%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Whoever condemns others for sins he commits himself is without excuse, because his verdict on them becomes a sentence on himself.

“Therefore thou art inexcusable,”

“Therefore” (dió) joins this verse to the sins of Romans 1. Anapológētos describes a person without an excuse, left defenceless before God.

“O man, whosoever thou art that judgest:”

The address is open to anyone who takes the judge’s seat, whatever his background.

“for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself;”

To judge (krínō) another proves that you know the standard, so the sentence (katakrínō) you pass on him falls on you as well.

“for thou that judgest doest the same things.”

The second “for” (gár) gives the ground. The verb prássō points to a practice, and “the same things” reaches from identical acts to the same sins of the heart.

God’s Judgment on Those Who Judge Others

Romans 2:1–5

Summary

At the end of Romans 1 Paul has described a world that held down the truth about God and sank into every kind of sin. Now he turns to the person who has read that list and agreed with every word. “O man,” he says, whoever you are that judges others, you are inexcusable, because you do the same things, and your verdict on them is a verdict on yourself. God’s judgment is according to truth, so the one who condemns others will face it too. For now God’s goodness, forbearance and longsuffering are holding that judgment back, and their purpose is to lead to repentance. The heart that hardens itself against that kindness stores up wrath for the day when God reveals his righteous judgment to all.

Who Paul is speaking to

These verses follow straight on from Romans 1:18–32, where Paul shows the wrath of God “revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men” (Romans 1:18) and describes those who turned from God to idols and every kind of immorality. The first word of Romans 2, “Therefore” (dió), ties the two chapters together. The reader who nodded along with Romans 1 now finds himself addressed directly. “O man” (ō ánthrōpos) is a call to anyone at all, “whosoever thou art”, who takes up the seat of the judge. Paul uses the same address again in verse 3, and the word “thou” runs through all five verses, so the warning comes to each reader personally.

Believers differ on whom Paul chiefly has in mind. Many hold that he is speaking above all to the Jewish reader, who had the law and the covenant, saw Israel as set apart and privileged before God, and was used to looking on the Gentiles as “sinners”. Others hold that he includes the morally serious Gentile too, since moral philosophy and criticism of other people’s behaviour were common among the Greeks and Romans. Both readings agree on the point. The church in Rome had Jews and Gentiles in it, self-righteousness can grow in either, and knowing what is right only adds to the accountability of the one who fails to live by it. Paul is building toward the conclusion of Romans 3:9–20, that Jews and Gentiles alike are “all under sin” (Romans 3:9), for “all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23).

Why the one who judges is without excuse

“Thou art inexcusable” translates anapológētos, a word for a person without an excuse, left defenceless when he has to answer for himself. Paul gives the reason with “for” (gár): “wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself.” To judge, krínō, is properly to distinguish or decide, in the mind or in a court, and by implication to try, condemn or punish. Here it means forming a critical verdict on someone else. To condemn, katakrínō, is the stronger form, to judge against someone and pass sentence.

The reasoning is close at hand. Whoever condemns another for a sin shows that he knows the standard that sin breaks, and he has agreed that the standard is right. So when he does the same things, ignorance is the one plea he has already given up, and the sentence he passed on his neighbour comes back on him. Paul says “judgest” three times in this one verse, pressing on the very act he is exposing. The irony is sharp. The act a person uses to raise himself above others becomes the evidence against him, and in exposing another’s fault the judge exposes his own.

“Doest the same things” uses the verb prássō with autós, “the same”. Prássō often speaks of a settled practice, a way of living, as well as single deeds, so the judge’s inconsistency runs through his life and empties his judgment of any weight.

Does “the same things” mean the very same sin?

It can mean the identical act, and it also reaches further, to falling short of God’s righteousness in similar ways and to the same sinful attitudes of heart, such as pride, lust or greed, showing themselves in different outward behaviour. Paul’s point is that the judge is a sinner in need of grace like the people he judges, since “all have sinned” (Romans 3:23).

Does Paul forbid all judging?

Paul is condemning hypocritical judgment, the verdict passed on others for sins the judge commits himself, and the posture of moral superiority that goes with it. Elsewhere Scripture calls believers to discern. Paul prays that the Philippians’ love may abound “in knowledge and in all judgment” so that they may “approve things that are excellent” (Philippians 1:9–10), he tells the Corinthians to judge those within the church (1 Corinthians 5:12), and John tells believers to “try the spirits whether they are of God” (1 John 4:1). What Romans 2 condemns is the spirit of the judge who forgets his own sin. Any discerning we do is to be done in humility, aware of our own need for grace, out of love and a desire for truth and restoration.

Jesus taught the same thing: “Judge not, that ye be not judged” (Matthew 7:1–5). Before we pull the mote out of our brother’s eye we are to cast the beam out of our own (Matthew 7:3–5). Luke records his words, “Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned” (Luke 6:37). James forbids believers to speak evil of one another and asks, “There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?” (James 4:11–12).

God’s judgment is according to truth

Verse 2 sets God’s judgment beside the judge’s. “But” (dé) is a simple connective, and here it carries the argument from the person who judges to the judgment of God. “We are sure” is eídō, a verb that properly means to see, and in the perfect form Paul uses here, to know. Paul states something he and his readers know for certain about God.

The judgment, kríma, is a decision, verdict or sentence, the outcome of a case. The verb “is”, estí, simply states it: God’s judgment is according to truth. “Truth”, alḗtheia, is reality and fact, what is really so, as against falsehood and pretence. A judgment “according to” (katá) truth is measured by things as they really are. Human judgment is easily swayed by bias, partial information and outward appearance. God sees each person as he is, motives and all, for the LORD told Samuel, “man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7). The psalmist sings that the LORD “shall judge the world with righteousness, and the people with his truth” (Psalm 96:13).

The judgment falls “against” (epí) “them which commit such things”. “Such things” (toioûtos) points back to the sins described in Romans 1:18–32, and in this setting it takes in the sins the judges practise themselves. “Commit” is prássō again, the same verb Paul used for the judge’s own conduct in verse 1. The verses that follow set out this impartial judgment in full (Romans 2:6–11). God “will render to every man according to his deeds” (Romans 2:6), “there is no respect of persons with God” (Romans 2:11), and “the doers of the law shall be justified” (Romans 2:13). John sees the dead “judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works” (Revelation 20:12).

The hope of escaping God’s judgment

Verse 3 puts the judge’s hidden assumption into words and makes him look at it. “Thinkest thou” is logízomai, which comes from lógos and means to count, reckon or consider, as a person does when he takes stock and reaches a conclusion. The judge has done his reckoning and come out wrong. He judges “them which do such things”, he “doest the same”, and he has counted on escaping.

“Escape” is ekpheúgō, made from ek, “out”, and pheúgō, “to flee”, so it means to flee out of something and get clear of it. The question carries its own answer. The one who practises sin will meet the judgment of God whatever he has said about others, and pointing at another person’s sin leaves his own exactly where it was. Paul sets the man’s judging (krínō) right beside “the judgment of God”, so that the one who sits as judge over others is shown standing before his own Judge, the “one lawgiver” of James 4:12.

The riches of God’s patience

Verse 4 opens with “Or”, a second question that names what may lie behind the judge’s confidence. When judgment is slow to fall, a person can read God’s patience as indifference, or even as approval of his sin. “Despisest thou” is kataphronéō, literally to think against, to disesteem, to look down on and treat with contempt. To despise God’s kindness in this way is to presume on it: to go on sinning because judgment is delayed, as if the delay meant approval, and to miss the call to change that the kindness carries.

Paul calls what is being despised “riches” (ploûtos), wealth in its fulness, and he names three things God has in that abundance. Goodness, chrēstótēs, is kindness and excellence of character, God’s generous disposition shown in action for the good of others. Forbearance is God holding himself back from punishing sin at once, a holding off of judgment for a time, something like a truce. Longsuffering is patience that endures over a long time, even under provocation. The psalmist praises God as “full of compassion, and gracious, longsuffering, and plenteous in mercy and truth” (Psalm 86:15).

“Not knowing” is agnoéō, to be ignorant, whether from a lack of understanding or from an unwillingness to see. What the despiser has missed is the purpose of all this kindness: “the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance.” The verb is ágō, to lead, bring or induce. Repentance, metánoia, is a change of mind with sorrow for guilt and an amendment of life, a turning away from sin and toward God. Every day that God holds back judgment is his patience at work, drawing the sinner to turn. Paul tells Titus that it was when “the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared” that God saved us “according to his mercy” (Titus 3:4–5).

Why is a just God so patient?

God is patient because he is both just and merciful. His justice requires that sin be punished, and his mercy gives sinners time to repent first. Peter says the same: “The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9). God’s patience shows his love and his desire to save, and it leaves room for people to turn from their wicked ways and take hold of his grace before the final judgment. That patience also has a limit, as verse 5 shows.

Storing up wrath for the day of wrath

Verse 5 opens with “But” (dé) and shows where the other road leads. “Hardness” is sklērótēs, callousness or stubbornness, a heart grown insensitive to God that resists his truth and the promptings of his Spirit. “Impenitent” is ametanóētos, unrepentant, and with “heart” (kardía) it describes a heart that refuses the very change of mind verse 4 spoke of. The person whom God’s kindness was leading to repentance has refused to be led, and this is willful resistance to his grace.

The result is put in a startling picture. “Treasurest up” is thēsaurízō, to amass or lay up in store, the word for building up wealth. Paul has just spoken of the riches of God’s goodness, and here the person who despised them is piling up a store of his own, and that store is wrath (orgḗ). Each unrepented sin and each season of stubbornness adds to it, and it waits for the day.

Orgḗ can mean violent passion or anger, and also a just abhorrence and, by implication, punishment. Used of God, it is his settled, holy opposition to sin and evil, the response of his justice to unrighteousness, which Paul has already said “is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men” (Romans 1:18).

The wrath is stored up “against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God”. “Revelation”, apokálypsis, is an unveiling: on that day God’s judgment will be shown openly to all. “Righteous judgment”, dikaiokrisía, is a single word in Greek meaning a just sentence. Everyone will see then that God’s verdict is fair and right, given according to truth and to each person’s deeds. This verse opens the account of that judgment which runs through Romans 2:5–11.

Who is storing up the wrath?

The hard and unrepentant person stores it up “unto thyself”, by his own choices. God’s wrath is his settled, holy opposition to all unrighteousness, and when a person keeps rejecting his grace, he builds up just cause for that judgment by his own actions. The judgment to come is a fair and fitting response to his own accumulated sin, and the responsibility for it is his.

What is the day of wrath?

The day of wrath is the time, still to come, when God’s righteous judgment will be carried out fully and in public on those who have rejected his grace and stayed in their sin. Hēméra is the ordinary word for day, and here it names an appointed time of reckoning, which may be longer than a single day of twenty-four hours. The prophets spoke of “the day of the LORD” in these terms: “Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger” (Isaiah 13:9), and Joel speaks of “the great and the terrible day of the LORD” (Joel 2:31). Paul applies that day to all mankind.

Only God knows when it will come, and Scripture places it at the end of the age, with the return of Christ and the final judgment, when every person will give account for his deeds. Jesus describes the Son of man on the throne of his glory with all nations gathered before him (Matthew 25:31–46). John sees the dead, small and great, judged before the great white throne (Revelation 20:11–15). Paul writes that the Lord Jesus will be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, “In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ” (2 Thessalonians 1:7–8).

Christ bore the judgment we deserved

These five verses close every way of escape a person might look for in himself. Condemning others, keeping the law and moral seriousness all leave the judge under the same judgment as those he condemns, and so they show how much every one of us needs a Saviour. Jesus Christ alone “knew no sin” (2 Corinthians 5:21), and so he alone is the righteous Judge with the right to condemn. Yet “God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved” (John 3:17).

In his Son, God “condemned sin in the flesh” (Romans 8:3). He who knew no sin was made sin for us, “that we might be made the righteousness of God in him” (2 Corinthians 5:21). He was “wounded for our transgressions”, and “the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all” (Isaiah 53:5–6). He is “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). So the wrath that the hard heart stores up was poured out on Christ at the cross for all who trust in him. “Being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him” (Romans 5:9), and “There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus” (Romans 8:1). Those in Christ are spared because Christ himself took the judgment in their place, and that is the only ground they stand on. Righteousness comes to us as God’s gift through faith in Christ (Romans 3:21–26), from a God “rich in mercy” (Ephesians 2:4–5), who so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son (John 3:16).

The cross is also the greatest display of the goodness that leads to repentance in verse 4. God’s goodness became something people could see and touch when the Son came in the flesh, his forbearance showed in Christ’s willingness to bear people’s rejection, and his longsuffering showed in his patient pursuit of sinners. The Holy Spirit whom Christ sent convicts the world of sin, of righteousness and of judgment, and so leads hearts to the repentance God’s goodness intends. And the same Jesus will be the Judge on that day, because the Father “hath committed all judgment unto the Son” (John 5:22). He came first in grace, and he will come again to judge.

Answering God’s kindness while it leads us

Paul’s questions come to every reader who agreed with Romans 1, and they ask us to look at ourselves before we look at anyone else. It is easy to find fault outside ourselves and so turn attention away from our own. The fitting answer to these verses is confession and repentance, the very thing God’s goodness is leading us to.

Because God judges according to truth, pretence and self-righteousness are useless before him, and our own lives lie open to his sight. That should give us a reverent fear of God that moves us to live honestly before him. The same Judge is rich in goodness, and his patience with us today is a gift meant to draw us to himself. So sin can be brought to him now, while his kindness is still leading, and the hard places of the heart can be given to his Spirit to soften. Those who know how much mercy they need will be slow to condemn others and ready to show them the same mercy they have received.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Romans 2:1–16. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 16 verses
Passage under commentRomans 2:1–16
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

In the former chapter the apostle had represented the state of the Gentile world to be as bad and black as the Jews were ready enough to pronounce it. And now, designing to show that the state of the Jews was very bad too, and their sin in many respects more aggravated, to prepare his way he sets himself in this part of the chapter to show that God would proceed upon equal terms of justice with Jews and Gentiles; and now with such a partial hand as the Jews were apt to think he would use in their favour.

I.He arraigns them for their censoriousness and self-conceit (Romans 2:1):

Thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest. As he expresses himself in general terms, the admonition may reach those many masters (James 3:1), of whatever nation or profession they are, that assume to themselves a power to censure, control, and condemn others. But he intends especially the Jews, and to them particularly he applies this general charge (Romans 2:21), Thou who teachest another teachest thou not thyself? The Jews were generally a proud sort of people, that looked with a great deal of scorn and contempt upon the poor Gentiles, as not worthy to be set with the dogs of their flock; while in the mean time they were themselves as bad and immoral - though not idolaters, as the Gentiles, yet sacrilegious, Romans 2:22. Therefore thou art inexcusable. If the Gentiles, who had but the light of nature, were inexcusable (Romans 1:20), much more the Jews, who had the light of the law, the revealed will of God, and so had greater helps than the Gentiles.

II.He asserts the invariable justice of the divine government, Romans 2:2, Romans 2:3.

To drive home the conviction, he here shows what a righteous God that is with whom we have to do, and how just in his proceedings. It is usual with the apostle Paul, in his writings, upon mention of some material point, to make large digressions upon it; as here concerning the justice of God (Romans 2:2), That the judgment of God is according to truth, - according to the eternal rules of justice and equity, - according to the heart, and not according to the outward appearance (1 Samuel 16:7), - according to the works, and not with respect to persons, is a doctrine which we are all sure of, for he would not be God if he were not just; but it behoves those especially to consider it who condemn others for those things which they themselves are guilty of, and so, while they practise sin and persist in that practice, think to bribe the divine justice by protesting against sin and exclaiming loudly upon others that are guilty, as if preaching against sin would atone for the guilt of it. But observe how he puts it to the sinner's conscience (Romans 2:3): Thinkest thou this, O man? O man, a rational creature, a dependent creature, made by God, subject under him, and accountable to him. The case is so plain that we may venture to appeal to the sinner's own thoughts: "Canst thou think that thou shalt escape the judgment of God? Can the heart-searching God be imposed upon by formal pretences, the righteous Judge of all so bribed and put off?" The most plausible politic sinners, who acquit themselves before men with the greatest confidence, cannot escape the judgment of God, cannot avoid being judged and condemned.

III.He draws up a charge against them (Romans 2:4, Romans 2:5) consisting of two branches: -

1.Slighting the goodness of God (Romans 2:4), the riches of his goodness. This is especially applicable to the Jews, who had singular tokens of the divine favour. Means are mercies, and the more light we sin against the more love we sin against. Low and mean thoughts of the divine goodness are at the bottom of a great deal of sin. There is in every wilful sin an interpretative contempt of the goodness of God; it is spurning at his bowels, particularly the goodness of his patience, his forbearance and long-suffering, taking occasion thence to be so much the more bold in sin, Ecclesiastes 8:11. Not knowing, that is, not considering, not knowing practically and with application, that the goodness of God leadeth thee, the design of it is to lead thee, to repentance. It is not enough for us to know that God's goodness leads to repentance, but we must know that it leads us - thee in particular. See here what method God takes to bring sinners to repentance. He leads them, not drives them like beasts, but leads them like rational creatures, allures them (Hosea 2:14); and it is goodness that leads, bands of love, Hosea 11:4. Compare Jeremiah 31:3. The consideration of the goodness of God, his common goodness to all (the goodness of his providence, of his patience, and of his offers), should be effectual to bring us all to repentance; and the reason why so many continue in impenitency is because they do not know and consider this.

2.Provoking the wrath of God, Romans 2:5. The rise of this provocation is a hard and impenitent heart; and the ruin of sinners is their walking after such a heart, being led by it. To sin is to walk in the way of the heart; and when that is a hard and impenitent heart (contracted hardness by long custom, besides that which is natural), how desperate must the course needs be! The provocation is expressed by treasuring up wrath. Those that go on in a course of sin are treasuring up unto themselves wrath. A treasure denotes abundance. It is a treasure that will be spending to eternity, and yet never exhausted; and yet sinners are still adding to it as to a treasure. Every wilful sin adds to the score, and will inflame the reckoning; it brings a branch to their wrath, as some read that (Ezekiel 8:17), they put the branch to their nose. A treasure denotes secrecy. The treasury or magazine of wrath is the heart of God himself, in which it lies hid, as treasures in some secret place sealed up; see Deuteronomy 32:34; Job 14:17. But withal it denotes reservation to some further occasion; as the treasures of the hail are reserved against the day of battle and war, Job 38:22, Job 38:23. These treasures will be broken open like the fountains of the great deep, Genesis 7:11. They are treasured up against the day of wrath, when they will be dispensed by the wholesale, poured out by full vials. Though the present day be a day of patience and forbearance towards sinners, yet there is a day of wrath coming-wrath, and nothing but wrath. Indeed, every day is to sinners a day of wrath, for God is angry with the wicked every day (Psalm 7:11), but there is the great day of wrath coming, Revelation 6:17. And that day of wrath will be the day of the revelation of the righteous judgment of God. The wrath of God is not like our wrath, a heat and passion; no, fury is not in him (Isaiah 27:4): but it is a righteous judgment, his will to punish sin, because he hates it as contrary to his nature. This righteous judgment of God is now many times concealed in the prosperity and success of sinners, but shortly it will be manifested before all the world, these seeming disorders set to rights, and the heavens shall declare his righteousness, Psalm 50:6. Therefore judge nothing before the time.

IV.He describes the measures by which God proceeds in his judgment.

Having mentioned the righteous judgment of God in Romans 2:5, he here illustrates that judgment, and the righteousness of it, and shows what we may expect from God, and by what rule he will judge the world. The equity of distributive justice is the dispensing of frowns and favours with respect to deserts and without respect to persons: such is the righteous judgment of God.

1.He will render to every man according to his deeds (Romans 2:6), a truth often mentioned in scripture, to prove that the Judge of all the earth does right.

(1.)In dispensing his favours; and this is mentioned twice here, both in Romans 2:7 and Romans 2:10. For he delights to show mercy. Observe,

[1.]The objects of his favour: Those who by patient continuance, etc. By this we may try our interest in the divine favour, and may hence be directed what course to take, that we may obtain it. Those whom the righteous God will reward are, First, Such as fix to themselves the right end, that seek for glory, and honour, and immortality; that is, the glory and honour which are immortal - acceptance with God here and for ever. There is a holy ambition which is at the bottom of all practical religion. This is seeking the kingdom of God, looking in our desires and aims as high as heaven, and resolved to take up with nothing short of it. This seeking implies a loss, sense of that loss, desire to retrieve it, and pursuits and endeavours consonant to those desires. Secondly, Such as, having fixed the right end, adhere to the right way: A patient continuance in well-doing. 1. There must be well-doing, working good, Romans 2:10. It is not enough to know well, and speak well, and profess well, and promise well, but we must do well: do that which is good, not only for the matter of it, but for the manner of it. We must do it well. 2. A continuance in well-doing. Not for a fit and a start, like the morning cloud and the early dew; but we must endure to the end: it is perseverance that wins the crown. 3. A patient continuance. This patience respects not only the length of the work, but the difficulties of it and the oppositions and hardships we may meet with in it. Those that will do well and continue in it must put on a great deal of patience.

[2.]The product of his favour. He will render to such eternal life. Heaven is life, eternal life, and it is the reward of those that patiently continue in well-doing; and it is called (Romans 2:10) glory, honour, and peace. Those that seek for glory and honour (Romans 2:7) shall have them. Those that seek for the vain glory and honour of this world often miss of them, and are disappointed; but those that seek for immortal glory and honour shall have them, and not only glory and honour, but peace. Worldly glory and honour are commonly attended with trouble; but heavenly glory and honour have peace with them, undisturbed everlasting peace.

(2.)In dispensing his frowns (Romans 2:8, Romans 2:9). Observe,

[1.]The objects of his frowns. In general those that do evil, more particularly described to be such as are contentious and do not obey the truth. Contentious against God. every wilful sin is a quarrel with God, it is striving with our Maker (Isaiah 45:9), the most desperate contention. The Spirit of God strives with sinners (Genesis 6:3), and impenitent sinners strive against the Spirit, rebel against the light (Job 24:13), hold fast deceit, strive to retain that sin which the Spirit strives to part them from. Contentious, and do not obey the truth. The truths of religion are not only to be known, but to be obeyed; they are directing, ruling, commanding; truths relating to practice. Disobedience to the truth is interpreted a striving against it. But obey unrighteousness - do what unrighteousness bids them do. Those that refuse to be the servants of truth will soon be the slaves of unrighteousness.

[2.]The products or instances of these frowns: Indignation and wrath, tribulation and anguish. These are the wages of sin. Indignation and wrath the causes - tribulation and anguish the necessary and unavoidable effects. And this upon the soul; souls are the vessels of that wrath, the subjects of that tribulation and anguish. Sin qualifies the soul for this wrath. The soul is that in or of man which is alone immediately capable of this indignation, and the impressions or effects of anguish therefrom. Hell is eternal tribulation and anguish, the product of wrath and indignation. This comes of contending with God, of setting briers and thorns before a consuming fire, Isaiah 27:4. Those that will not bow to his golden sceptre will certainly be broken by his iron rod. Thus will God render to every man according to his deeds.

2.There is no respect of persons with God, Romans 2:11. As to the spiritual state, there is a respect of persons; but not as to outward relation or condition. Jews and Gentiles stand upon the same level before God. This was Peter's remark upon the first taking down of the partition-wall (Acts 10:34), that God is no respecter of persons; and it is explained in the next words, that in every nation he that fears God, and works righteousness, is accepted of him. God does not save men with respect to their external privileges or their barren knowledge and profession of the truth, but according as their state and disposition really are. In dispensing both his frowns and favours it is both to Jew and Gentile. If to the Jews first, who had greater privileges, and made a greater profession, yet also to the Gentiles, whose want of such privileges will neither excuse them from the punishment of their ill-doing nor bar them out from the reward of their well-doing (see Colossians 3:11); for shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?

V.He proves the equity of his proceedings with all, when he shall actually come to Judge them (Romans 2:12-16), upon this principle, that that which is the rule of man's obedience is the rule of God's judgment. Three degrees of light are revealed to the children of men: -

1.The light of nature. This the Gentiles have, and by this they shall be judged: As many as have sinned without law shall perish without law; that is, the unbelieving Gentiles, who had no other guide but natural conscience, no other motive but common mercies, and had not the law of Moses nor any supernatural revelation, shall not be reckoned with for the transgression of the law they never had, nor come under the aggravation of the Jews' sin against and judgment by the written law; but they shall be judged by, as they sin against, the law of nature, not only as it is in their hearts, corrupted, defaced, and imprisoned in unrighteousness, but as in the uncorrupt original the Judge keeps by him. Further to clear this (Romans 2:14, Romans 2:15), in a parenthesis, he evinces that the light of nature was to the Gentiles instead of a written law. He had said (Romans 2:12) they had sinned without law, which looks like a contradiction; for where there is no law there is no transgression. But, says he, though they had not the written law (Psalm 147:20), they had that which was equivalent, not to the ceremonial, but to the moral law. They had the work of the law. He does not mean that work which the law commands, as if they could produce a perfect obedience; but that work which the law does. The work of the law is to direct us what to do, and to examine us what we have done. Now,

(1.)They had that which directed them what to do by the light of nature: by the force and tendency of their natural notions and dictates they apprehended a clear and vast difference between good and evil. They did by nature the things contained in the law. They had a sense of justice and equity, honour and purity, love and charity; the light of nature taught obedience to parents, pity to the miserable, conservation of public peace and order, forbade murder, stealing, lying, perjury, etc. Thus they were a law unto themselves.

(2.)They had that which examined them as to what they had done: Their conscience also bearing witness. They had that within them which approved and commended what was well done and which reproached them for what was done amiss. Conscience is a witness, and first or last will bear witness, though for a time it may be bribed or brow-beaten. It is instead of a thousand witnesses, testifying of that which is most secret; and their thoughts accusing or excusing, passing a judgment upon the testimony of conscience by applying the law to the fact. Conscience is that candle of the Lord which was not quite put out, no, not in the Gentile world. The heathen have witnessed to the comfort of a good conscience.

- Hic murus aheneus esto,

Nil conscire sibi -

Be this thy brazen bulwark of defence,

Still to preserve thy conscious innocence.

- Hor.

and to the terror of a bad one:

- Quos diri conseia facti

Mens habet attonitos, et surdo verbere caedit -

No lash is heard, and yet the guilty heart

Is tortur'd with a self-inflicted smart

- Juv. Sat. 13.

Their thoughts the meanwhile, metaxu allēlōn - among themselves, or one with another. The same light and law of nature that witnesses against sin in them, and witnessed against it in others, accused or excused one another. Vicissim, so some read it, by turns; according as they observed or broke these natural laws and dictates, their consciences did either acquit or condemn them. All this did evince that they had that which was to them instead of a law, which they might have been governed by, and which will condemn them, because they were not so guided and governed by it. So that the guilty Gentiles are left without excuse. God is justified in condemning them. They cannot plead ignorance, and therefore are likely to perish if they have not something else to plead.

2.The light of the law. This the Jews had, and by this they shall be judged (Romans 2:12): As many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law. They sinned, not only having the law, but en nomō - in the law, in the midst of so much law, in the face and light of so pure and clear a law, the directions of which were so very full and particular, and the sanctions of it so very cogent and enforcing. These shall be judged by the law; their punishment shall be, as their sin is, so much the greater for their having the law. The Jew first, Romans 2:9. It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon. Thus Moses did accuse them (John 5:45), and they fell under the many stripes of him that knew his master's will, and did it not, Luke 12:47. The Jews prided themselves very much in the law; but, to confirm what he had said, the apostle shows (Romans 2:13) that their having, and hearing, and knowing the law, would not justify them, but their doing it. The Jewish doctors bolstered up their followers with an opinion that all that were Jews, how bad soever they lived, should have a place in the world to come. This the apostle here opposes: it was a great privilege that they had the law, but not a saving privilege, unless they lived up to the law they had, which it is certain the Jews did not, and therefore they had need of a righteousness wherein to appear before God. We may apply it to the gospel: it is not hearing, but doing that will save us, John 13:17; James 1:22.

3.The light of the gospel: and according to this those that enjoyed the gospel shall be judge (Romans 2:16): According to my gospel; not meant of any fifth gospel written by Paul, as some conceit; or of the gospel written by Luke, as Paul's amanuensis (Euseb. Hist. lib 3, cap. 8), but the gospel in general, called Paul's because he was a preacher of it. As many as are under that dispensation shall be judged according to that dispensation, Mark 16:16. Some refer those words, according to my gospel, to what he says of the day of judgment: "There will come a day of judgment, according as I have in my preaching often told you; and that will be the day of the final judgment both of Jews and Gentiles." It is good for us to get acquainted with what is revealed concerning that day.

(1.)There is a day set for a general judgment. The day, the great day, his day that is coming, Psalm 37:13.

(2.)The judgment of that day will be put into the hands of Jesus Christ. God shall judge by Jesus Christ, Acts 17:31. It will be part of the reward of his humiliation. Nothing speaks more terror to sinners, or more comfort to saints, than this, that Christ shall be the Judge.

(3.)The secrets of men shall then be judged. Secret services shall be then rewarded, secret sins shall be then punished, hidden things shall be brought to light. That will be the great discovering day, when that which is now done in corners shall be proclaimed to all the world.

Historical interpretation

Ten Centuries of Reception

6 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

6 quotes · AD 258–1274
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
2003004005006007008009001000110012001300

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

That we must not rashly judge of another. In the Gospel according to Luke: "Judge not, that ye be not judged: condemn not, that ye be not condemned." Of this same subject to the Romans: "Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. But he shall stand; for God is able to make him stand." And again: "Wherefore thou art without excuse, O every man that judgest: for in that in which thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou doest the same things which thou judgest. But dost thou hope, who judgest those who do evil, and doest the same, that thou thyself shalt escape the judgment of God" Also in the first Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians.: "And let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall." And again: "If any man thinketh that he knoweth anything, he knoweth not yet in what manner he ought to know."
d. AD 384AmbrosiasterPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES
Paul shows that the man who does evil and consents to others who do it is deserving of death, lest perhaps the one who does it and pretends not to approve of others who do it … might think he can be excused, because he can conceal his sin for a time.… It is not right to give in to someone who pretends to be better when in fact he is worse. Such a person appears to escape notice and to be worthy of honor, but in fact he will be punished.
d. AD 407John ChrysostomPost-NiceneSourceHomily on Romans 5
"Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man; whosoever thou art that judgest; for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself." These things he says, with an aim at the rulers, inasmuch as that city then had the rule of the world put into its hands. He anticipated them therefore by saying, Thou art depriving thyself of defence, whoever thou mayest be; for when thou condemnest an adulterer, and thyself committest adultery, although no man condemneth thee, in thy judgment upon the guilty person thou hast also passed sentence against thyself.
d. AD 418PelagiusPost-NiceneSourcePELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS
This concerns those who are in a position to pass judgment. Judges and princes are being put on trial. By a natural process everyone pronounces a sentence which fits the crime and knows that righteousness deserves reward while wickedness should be punished.
d. AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourceAUGUSTINE ON ROMANS 7-8
Paul is speaking here of sins already committed. And when he says “O man, whoever you are,” he includes not only the Gentile but also the Jew who wanted to judge the Gentiles according to the law.
d. AD 1274Thomas AquinasMedieval
169. After showing that the Gentiles did not become just from the knowledge of the truth they had, the Apostle now shows that neither were the Jews made just by the things in which they gloried. Consequently, both of them need the power of the gospel’s grace for salvation. First, therefore, he says that the Jews were not made just by the Law; secondly, that they were not made just by the race in which they gloried, in chapter 3 [n. 246] at Then what advantage has the Jew?; 90 thirdly, that they were not made just by circumcision, in chapter 4 [n. 322] at What therefore shall we say? 170. In regard to the first point it should be noted that Jews and Gentiles converted to the faith judged each other on their previous life. For the Jews objected to the Gentiles that when they lived without God’s law, they sacrificed to idols. The Gentiles on their part objected to the Jews that even though they received God’s law, they did not keep it. First, therefore, he rebukes both sides and their extravagant judgment; secondly, he shows that the Jews were not worthy of a reward, because the things they glory in were not sufficient for salvation, there [v. 13; n. 210] at For it is not the hearers of the Law. In regard to the first he does two things. First, he confutes human judgment; secondly, he discloses and commends the divine judgment, there [v. 2; n. 178] at For we know. In regard to the first he does two things: first, he proposes that although they judge one another, neither has an excuse; secondly, he gives the reason, there [v. lb; n. 172] at for in passing judgment. 171. First, therefore, he concludes from what he stated in the first chapter that even though the Gentiles by their wickedness suppressed the truth they knew about God, you have no excuse, 0 man, whoever you are, when you judge another, just as he said earlier: "So they are without excuse" (Rom 1:20). 91 He says, whoever you are, as if to say: Whether Jew or Gentile, because even the Gentiles, who might seem to have an excuse, cannot be excused on the plea of ignorance, as he stated above in 1:20 ff; "Do not pronounce judgment before the time" (1 Cor 4:5). 172. Then when he says For in passing judgment he gives the reason by rejecting the causes for excuse: first, ignorance; secondly, innocence, there [v. 1c; n. 176] at because you, the judge. 173. Ignorance is excluded by the very act of judging. For whoever judges another an evildoer shows that he knows that the conduct is evil and, therefore, that he is himself worthy of condemnation. And this is what he says: You have no excuse, for in passing judgment upon him as an evildoer you condemn yourself, i.e., you show that you are worthy of being condemned: "Judge not, that you may not be judged" (Mt 7:1). 174. This does not mean that every judgment is a cause of condemnation. For there are three kinds of judgment: one is just, i.e., made according to the rule of justice: "Love justice, you rulers of the earth" (Wis 1:1); another is not just, i.e., made contrary to the rule of justice: "Although servants of his kingdom, you did not rule rightly" (Wis 6:4); the third is rash judgment against which Ec (5:2) says: "Be not rash with your mouth." A rash judgment is made in two ways: in one way, when a person passes judgment on a matter committed to him without due knowledge of the truth, contrary to what is stated in Jb (29:16): "I searched out the cause of him whom I did not know." In another way, when a person presumes to judge about hidden matters, of which God alone has the power to judge, contrary to what is stated in 1 Cor (4:5): "Do not pronounce 92 judgment before the time, before the Lord comes, who will bring to light the things now hidden in darkness." 175. But some things are hidden not only in relation to us but of their very nature and so belong solely to God’s knowledge: first, the thoughts of the heart: "Man’s heart is deceitful and unsearchable. Who can understand it? I, the Lord, search the mind and try the heart" (Jer 17:9); secondly, the contingent future: "Tell us what is to come hereafter that we may know you are gods" (Is 41:23). Hence, as Augustine says: "There are two cases in which we must beware of rash judgment: when it is not certain in what spirit something was done, or when it is not certain how a person will turn out, who now appears to be good or to be wicked." The first judgment is not a cause for condemnation, but the second and third are. 176. Then when he says for you, the judge, he rejects the other excuse, namely, innocence. As if to say: The reason why you, the judge of others, condemn yourself is that you are doing the very same things for which you condemn them; consequently, it seems that you are acting against your conscience: "Why do you see the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye?" (Mt 7:3). 177. However, it should be noted that it is not always true, when someone judges another concerning a sin which he himself commits, that he automatically draws a condemnation upon himself, because he does not always sin mortally by so judging; yet he always reveals his own damnation. For if he is publicly guilty of the sin concerning which he judges another, he seems to be giving scandal by judging, unless perhaps he humbly reproves himself along with the other and laments his sin. 93 But if he is secretly guilty of the same sin, he does not sin by judging another about the same sin, especially when he does so with humility and with an effort to rise again, as Augustine says in The Lord’s Sermon on the Mount: "When necessity compels us to correct someone, let us first examine whether it is a vice, such as we never had: and then let us reflect that we could have bad it or that we once had it and no longer have it: and then our common weakness will prod the memory, so that mercy and not hatred will guide that correction. But if we discover that we are presently guilty of the same vice, we should not scold but lament together and invite the other to join you in grieving." 178. Then when he says For we know (v. 2), he discloses and commends God’s judgment. And concerning this he does three things. First, he declares the truth of God’s judgment; secondly, he rejects a contrary opinion, there [v. 3; n. 180] at Do you suppose; thirdly, he manifests the truth, there [v. 6; n. 189] at Who will render. 179. First, therefore, he says: The reason I say that you condemn yourself, when you do the same things that you judge, is that we know, i.e., we hold it as certain, that the judgment of God rightly falls upon those who do such things i.e. God’s judgment threatens them: "The avenger of sin is the sword, that you may know there is a judgment" (Jb 19:29); "God will bring every deed into judgment" (Ec 12:14). We also know that this judgment will be based on the truth: "He will judge the earth with righteousness" (Ps 96:13). But man’s judgment, even though it be formed justly, is not always based on the truth of the affair, but on the words of witnesses, which sometimes clash with the truth. But this cannot happen in the divine judgment, because, as is said in Jer (21:23): "I am 94 the judge and witness." Nor is He deceived by false allegations: "I will not spare him, nor his mighty words, and framed to make supplication" (Jb 41:12). 180. Then when he says Do you suppose (v. 3) he rejects a contrary opinion. First, he states it; secondly, the cause of it, there [v. 4a; n. 182] at Or do you despise; thirdly, he disproves it, there [v. 4b; n. 183] at Do you not know. 181. First, therefore, he says: I have said that God’s judgment is in accordance with the truth, against those who do such things. But do you not, O man, whoever you are, who judges those who do such things and yet do them yourself, do you not fear a higher judgment? Do you suppose that you will escape the judgment of God? As if to say: If you suppose this, you are wrong: "Whither shall I go from thy Spirit? or whither shall I flee from your presence? (Ps 139:7); "All way of escape will be lost to them" (Jb 11:20). 182. Then when he says, Or do you presume, he shows the cause of this false supposition. For since man is not punished at once by God for sin, he supposes that he will not be punished, which is contrary to Si (4:5): "Do not say, ‘I sinned, and what happened to me? For the Lord is slow to anger"; "because sentence against an evil deed is not executed speedily, the heart of the sons of men is fully set to do evil" (Ec 8:11) Yet the fact that the sinner does evil a hundred times and is patiently endured should not lead him to presume on God, but to conclude that it is good to fear Him. Therefore, he says here, do you presume upon: "When wickedness comes, contempt comes also" (Pr 18:3); the riches, i.e., the abundance: "God who is rich in mercy" (Eph 2:3); of his kindness, through which He diffuses His blessings on us: Thou openest thy 95 hand and satisfiest the desire of every living thing" (Psl45:l6). For according to Denis the good involves the notion of diffusing itself: "The Lord is good to those who wait on him." (Lam 3:25); and longsuffering, through which Be endures for a long time those who sin from weakness and continue in their sin for a long time: "And count the forbearance of our Lord as salvation" (2 Pt 3:15); and patience, through which He endures those who sin grievously and from malice: "God is a righteous and patient judge. Is he indignant every day?" (Ps 7:11). 183. Then when he says Do you not know (v.4b) he disproves the aforementioned cause, namely the cause of contempt of the divine patience. First, he discloses the purpose of God’s patience; secondly, the danger of contempt, there [v. 5; n. 186] at But by your hardness. 184. First, therefore, he says it is hard to understand your scorn; do you not know that God’s kindness in postponing punishment is meant to lead you to repentance? "The Lord is not slow about his promise as some count slowness, but forbearing toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance" (2 Pt 3:9); "The Lord waits to be gracious to you" (Is 30:l8). 185. As is said in the gloss [of Lombard], the Apostle seems to touch upon three groups of sinners: those who promise themselves impunity; those who scorn God’s goodness; and the ignorant. Hence, the Gloss says: "You sin, O man, as long as you promise yourself that you will escape punishment; you sin more gravely, because you scorn; you sin most gravely, because you are ignorant. 96 But this seems to be false, for ignorance makes a sin less serious, rather than more serious. The answer, as is held by some, is that it is more serious, i.e., more dangerous for some, because those who are ignorant of sin do not seek a remedy. Or it is most serious, if it is the form of ignorance that pertains to unbelief, which is the gravest sin: "If anyone does not recognize this, he is not recognized" (1 Cor 14:38). Or it is most serious in ingratitude, as Augustine says: "One who does not recognize a blessing is more ungrateful than one who belittles, i.e., scorns it." 186. Then when he says But by your hardness (v. 5) he shows the danger of contempt, because it is not softened by the blessings of God’s goodness: "A hard heart will be afflicted at the end" (Si 4:26); and impenitent heart, which is not moved to repent by God’s forbearance and patience: "No man repents of his wickedness" (Is 8:6), you are storing up wrath for yourself, i.e., you are multiplying the debt of punishment: "You have laid up a treasure of wrath for the last days" (Jas 5:3). Hence there follows on the day of wrath, i.e., on the day of judgment: "A day of wrath is that day" (Zeph 1:15), namely, because God does not now inflict the punishment He will inflict then, as is stated in Ps 75 (v.2): "At the set time I will judge with equity"; when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed, because the justice of God’s judgment will be revealed then, whereas now it is not believed or does not seem just: "Soon my salvation will come and my justice revealed" (Is 56:1). 187. Because the gloss [of Lombard, col. 1340] says that by hardness and impenitent heart is meant a sin against the Holy Spirit, which is unforgivable, it is important to see what a sin against the Holy Spirit is and why it is unforgivable. 97 Accordingly, it should be noted that in the opinion of the earlier Fathers of the Church who preceded Augustine, namely, Athanasius, Hilary, Ambrose, Jerome and Chrysostom, the sin against the Holy Spirit was the blasphemy whereby the works of the Holy Spirit are attributed to an unclean spirit, as in Matthew (12:31). It is considered unforgivable both in this life and in the future, because the Jews were punished for this sin even in this life by the Romans and in the life to come by devils; or because it has no basis for being excused, unlike the blasphemy they spoke against Christ, inasmuch as He was a son of man: "Behold a glutton and a drunkard" (Mt 11:19). They could have been led to say this on account of the weakness of the flesh, as occurred even in the Old Testament, when the children of Israel complained about the lack of bread and water, as we read in Ex (16:2 ff). This could be considered a human failing and easy to forgive. But later on when they declared before an idol: "These are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt" (Ex 32:4), they sinned against the Holy Spirit, for they attributed God’s work to demons. Hence their sin is called unforgivable, when the Lord answers: "Nevertheless, in the day when I visit, I will visit their sin upon them" (Ex 32:34). Augustine, on the other hand, calls a sin against the Holy Spirit any word or blasphemy a person speaks against the Holy Spirit, through Whom sins are forgiven, as is stated in Jn (20:22): "Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven." Indeed, this sin is committed in the heart, in word and in deed, as long as one continues in sin to the end. Consequently, final impenitence is a sin against the Spirit and of its very nature unforgivable. 98 Later teachers call a sin against the Holy Spirit one that is committed with deliberate malice, which is opposed to the goodness appropriated to the Holy Spirit, just as a sin against the Son of God is one committed from ignorance, which is opposed to the wisdom appropriated to the Son. Similarly, a sin against the Father is one committed through weakness, which is opposed to the power appropriated to the Father. Consequently, a sin against the Father and against the Son is deemed forgivable, because the very fact that it is committed from ignorance or from weakness seems to be a ground for excuse. But one committed from deliberate malice has no ground for excuse; hence, it is deemed unforgivable, because it has nothing in it to plead forgiveness; although God does forgive it sometimes, because He is good, just as He sometimes used His power to cure a naturally incurable disease. 188. In light of the foregoing, six kinds of sin against the Holy Spirit are listed, each excluding something by which sin is forgiven. The first two are taken on the part of God, namely, hope in His mercy, to which is opposed despair, and fear of God’s justice, to which is opposed presumption. Two others are taken on the part of man, namely, contempt for the changeable good, to which is opposed obstinacy, which is here called hardness, through which a person hardens his soul to sin; and abandonment of the state of being turned away from God, to which is opposed an impenitent heart, which never intends to repent and return to God. The last two are taken on the part of God’s gifts, one of which is faith "by faith sins are cleansed," to which is opposed resistance to the acknowledged truth. The other is 99 charity: "Charity covers all offenses" (Pr 10:12), to which is opposed envy of a brother’s grace.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Romans 2:1 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8