Skip to content
“The Necessity of the Gospel: God’s Wrath Against Sin”· Romans 1:18–32
Translation
King James Version
Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Who G3748 knowing G1921 the judgment G1345 of God G2316, that G3754 they which commit G4238 such things G5108 are G1526 worthy G514 of death G2288, not G3756 only G3440 do G4160 the same G846, but G235 G2532 have pleasure G4909 in them that do G4238 them.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
They know well enough God’s righteous decree that people who do such things deserve to die; yet not only do they keep doing them, but they applaud others who do the same.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things are worthy of death, they not only continue to do these things, but also approve of those who practice them.
Ask
American Standard Version
who, knowing the ordinance of God, that they that practise such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but also consent with them that practise them.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
who, knowing the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but also approve of those who practice them.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Consolidated into verse 31 by this translation.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
who the righteous judgment of God having known--that those practising such things are worthy of death--not only do them, but also have delight with those practising them.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 27,963 of 31,102 · 89.9%

Study This Verse

Summary

Romans 1:32 serves as a stark culmination of Paul's indictment against humanity, revealing the profound depth of rebellion against God. It describes individuals who, despite possessing a clear understanding of God's righteous judgment that certain actions are worthy of death, not only persist in committing these very sins but also actively derive pleasure from and endorse those who engage in such practices. This verse highlights a hardened heart that has not merely fallen into sin, but has embraced and celebrated unrighteousness, demonstrating a complete inversion of divine moral order.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse concludes Paul's powerful opening argument in Romans 1:18-31, detailing the consequences of humanity's suppression of the truth about God. Having described the downward spiral from idolatry to various forms of sexual immorality and a comprehensive list of vices, Paul reaches a chilling climax in verse 32. It's not enough that people commit these sins; the ultimate sign of their depravity is their active approval and shared delight in the sins of others. This sets the stage for Paul's subsequent argument in Romans 2 concerning God's impartial judgment on all humanity, both Jew and Gentile, based on their deeds and the light they have received.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Paul is writing to the church in Rome, the capital of an empire known for its diverse religious practices, philosophical schools, and often, pervasive moral laxity. The "such things" mentioned in the verse refer to the widespread societal behaviors described in the preceding verses, including idolatry, homosexuality, and a litany of social sins like envy, murder, strife, deceit, and malice (Romans 1:24-31). The concept of "judgment of God" would have been understood by both Jewish believers (from the Old Testament Law) and Gentile believers (from natural law and conscience), even if their specific understanding of divine justice differed. Paul's description reflects the moral landscape of the Greco-Roman world, where many of these behaviors were not only tolerated but sometimes celebrated.
  • Key Themes:
    • Divine Revelation and Human Suppression: A central theme in Romans 1 is that God's truth is clearly revealed through creation and conscience (Romans 1:19-20), yet humanity actively suppresses this truth, leading to a "reprobate mind" (Romans 1:28). Verse 32 underscores this by stating that people act contrary to their own knowledge of God's judgment.
    • The Depth of Human Depravity: The verse highlights the ultimate stage of human rebellion: not merely committing sins out of weakness or desire, but actively endorsing and finding pleasure in the unrighteousness of others. This signifies a profound moral inversion and a complete rejection of God's holy standards.
    • God's Righteous Judgment: The "judgment of God" is a foundational theme throughout Romans, emphasizing God's justice against all ungodliness and unrighteousness (Romans 1:18). This verse reinforces that humanity is without excuse because they are aware of this impending judgment.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

knowing epiginṓskō' G1921

This term signifies more than a casual acquaintance; it implies a full, accurate, or complete knowledge, a recognition based on experience or deep understanding. In the context of Romans 1:32, it means humanity has a conscious, undeniable awareness of God's moral standards and the just consequences for violating them, whether through natural revelation, conscience, or specific divine law.

judgment dikaíōma' G1345

Derived from the verb "to justify," this word refers to an equitable deed, a righteous ordinance, or a just decision. Here, it denotes God's righteous verdict or decree concerning the unrighteous actions, specifically His pronouncement that such sins are "worthy of death." It speaks to the inherent justice of God's moral order.

have pleasure syneudokéō' G4909

This compound verb combines "with" (σύν) and "to think well of/be pleased" (εὐδοκέω). It means to consent with, approve of, or take pleasure in common with others. It goes beyond passive tolerance or mere acceptance, indicating an active, shared delight, approval, or even encouragement of the sinful actions of others, thereby participating in their sin by endorsing it.

Verse Breakdown

"Who knowing the judgment of God"

This clause establishes that the individuals in question are not ignorant of divine justice. They possess an inherent or revealed understanding of God's moral standards and the dire consequences of violating them. This knowledge renders them culpable and without excuse.

"that they which commit such things are worthy of death"

This specifies the content of the known judgment. The "such things" refer to the comprehensive list of vices and moral degradations detailed in Romans 1:29-31. God's righteous verdict is that these actions are not minor transgressions but are so grievous that they justly incur the penalty of spiritual and eternal death.

"not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them"

This final phrase reveals the extreme depth of human depravity. It's not merely that people engage in these sinful practices themselves; they also find satisfaction, approval, and even shared delight in the unrighteous actions of others. This indicates a hardened conscience that not only rejects God's law personally but actively promotes and celebrates its rejection communally, signifying a complete moral collapse and hostility towards God's holiness.

Literary Devices

Romans 1:32 functions as a powerful climax to Paul's description of humanity's descent into depravity, moving beyond personal sin to communal endorsement of evil. The verse employs striking juxtaposition by contrasting humanity's "knowing the judgment of God" with their subsequent actions of committing sin and delighting in the sins of others. This highlights the willful defiance and irrationality of a fallen humanity that acts against its own inherent knowledge of divine justice. Furthermore, the phrase "have pleasure in them that do them" serves as an intensification of sin, indicating a deeper level of moral corruption where unrighteousness is not merely tolerated but celebrated, signifying a complete inversion of God's righteous standards.

Theological and Thematic Connections

This verse profoundly connects to the doctrine of human depravity, asserting that humanity's rebellion against God is not merely a matter of ignorance or weakness, but a conscious, willful rejection of divine truth and a perverse delight in unrighteousness. This state of affairs underscores the absolute necessity of God's intervention for salvation, as humanity is utterly incapable of saving itself. It highlights that sin is not just an individual act but can become a communal endorsement of evil, further entrenching humanity in its fallen state and demonstrating its desperate need for grace. The "judgment of God" here is not arbitrary but a just consequence for a humanity that has actively chosen to suppress truth and embrace darkness, even celebrating it in others.

Reflection and Application

Romans 1:32 presents a profound challenge to believers regarding their posture towards sin, both personally and communally. It compels us to examine whether we truly hate what God hates, or if there are areas where we, perhaps subtly, condone or even find amusement in behaviors that contradict God's righteous standards, either in ourselves or in others. This verse calls for a radical self-assessment: are we merely avoiding certain sins, or are we actively cultivating a heart that delights in God's holiness and grieves over all unrighteousness? It reminds us that spiritual maturity involves not just abstaining from evil, but also actively abhorring it and refusing to participate in its promotion or celebration, even indirectly. Our witness to a fallen world is compromised if we, who "know the judgment of God" through His revealed Word, fail to demonstrate a clear distinction from those who "have pleasure in them that do them."

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what ways might I, perhaps unknowingly, "have pleasure in them that do them" by condoning or even celebrating behaviors that God calls sin, whether in media, entertainment, or social circles?
  2. How does my awareness of God's judgment influence my daily choices, my conversations, and my interactions with culture?
  3. What steps can I take to cultivate a heart that genuinely grieves over sin and delights in God's righteousness, aligning my affections with God's?

FAQ

What does Paul mean by "knowing the judgment of God"?

Paul indicates that humanity possesses an inherent or revealed understanding of God's moral law and the consequences of violating it. This knowledge can come through the natural revelation of God's character in creation (as described in Romans 1:19-20), through the inner witness of conscience (Romans 2:14-15), or through specific divine revelation like the Law given to Israel. Regardless of the source, the point is that humanity is not ignorant of God's righteous standards or His just verdict against sin. This knowledge renders them culpable for their rebellion.

Why is "having pleasure in them that do them" considered such a severe aspect of sin?

This phrase signifies a profound level of moral corruption and a hardened heart. It moves beyond merely committing sin out of weakness or desire to an active endorsement and shared delight in the unrighteousness of others. This indicates a conscience that is not only seared but has inverted its moral compass, where what God condemns is embraced and even applauded. It reveals a deep-seated hostility towards God's holiness and righteousness, effectively becoming an accomplice and promoter of evil. This communal approval of sin intensifies the rebellion against God and demonstrates a complete rejection of His moral authority.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Romans 1:32 vividly portrays the depths of humanity's fallen state, a condition of willful rebellion and active endorsement of sin that underscores the absolute necessity of a divine deliverer. This desperate human condition finds its complete fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While humanity, "knowing the judgment of God," chooses death and delights in unrighteousness, Christ, "who knew no sin" (2 Corinthians 5:21), willingly embraced the "judgment of God" on the cross, becoming "obedient unto death, even the death of the cross" (Philippians 2:8) to rescue those "worthy of death." His sacrifice did not merely cover sins but conquered the power of sin, including the perverse pleasure in unrighteousness, offering instead a new heart that delights in God's law (Psalm 1:2) and seeks to live righteously. Through faith in Him, believers are transformed from those who "have pleasure in them that do them" to those who "hate evil" and "hold fast to what is good" (Romans 12:9), reflecting the very character of God. The ultimate fulfillment of this verse, therefore, is found in Christ's triumph over sin and death, offering life and righteousness to all who believe, enabling them to live no longer for sin but for Him who died and rose again (2 Corinthians 5:15).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Romans 1:19–32. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 14 verses
Passage under commentRomans 1:19–32
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

In this last part of the chapter the apostle applies what he had said particularly to the Gentile world, in which we may observe,

I.The means and helps they had to come to the knowledge of God.

Though they had not such a knowledge of his law as Jacob and Israel had (Psa 147:20), yet among them he left not himself without witness (Act 14:17): For that which may be known, etc., Rom 1:19, Rom 1:20. Observe,

1.What discoveries they had: That which may be known of God is manifest, en autois - among them; that is, there were some even among them that had the knowledge of God, were convinced of the existence of one supreme Numen. The philosophy of Pythagoras, Plato, and the Stoics, discovered a great deal of the knowledge of God, as appears by abundance of testimonies. That which may be known, which implies that there is a great deal which may not be known. The being of God may be apprehended, but cannot be comprehended. We cannot by searching find him out, Job 11:7-9. Finite understandings cannot perfectly know an infinite being; but, blessed be God, there is that which may be known, enough to lead us to our chief end, the glorifying and enjoying of him; and these things revealed belong to us and to our children, while secret things are not to be pried into, Deu 29:29.

2.Whence they had these discoveries: God hath shown it to them. Those common natural notions which they had of God were imprinted upon their hearts by the God of nature himself, who is the Father of lights. This sense of a Deity, and a regard to that Deity, are so connate with the human nature that some think we are to distinguish men from brutes by these rather than by reason.

3.By what way and means these discoveries and notices which they had were confirmed and improved, namely, by the work of creation (Rom 1:20); For the invisible things of God, etc.

(1.)Observe what they knew: The invisible things of him, even his eternal power and Godhead. Though God be not the object of sense, yet he hath discovered and made known himself by those things that are sensible. The power and Godhead of God are invisible things, and yet are clearly seen in their products. He works in secret (Job 23:8, Job 23:9; Psa 139:15; Ecc 11:5), but manifests what he has wrought, and therein makes known his power and Godhead, and others of his attributes which natural light apprehends in the idea of a God. They could not come by natural light to the knowledge of the three persons in the Godhead (though some fancy they have found footsteps of this in Plato's writings), but they did come to the knowledge of the Godhead, at least so much knowledge as was sufficient to have kept them from idolatry. This was that truth which they held in unrighteousness.

(2.)How they knew it: By the things that are made, which could not make themselves, nor fall into such an exact order and harmony by any casual hits; and therefore must have been produced by some first cause or intelligent agent, which first cause could be no other than an eternal powerful God. See Psa 19:1; Isa 40:26; Act 17:24. The workman is known by his work. The variety, multitude, order, beauty, harmony, different nature, and excellent contrivance, of the things that are made, the direction of them to certain ends, and the concurrence of all the parts to the good and beauty of the whole, do abundantly prove a Creator and his eternal power and Godhead. Thus did the light shine in the darkness. And this from the creation of the world. Understand it either,

[1.]As the topic from which the knowledge of them is drawn. To evince this truth, we have recourse to the great work of creation. And some think this ktisis kosmou, this creature of the world (as it may be read), is to be understood of man, the ktisis kat' exochēn - the most remarkable creature of the lower world, called ktisis, Mar 16:15. The frame and structure of human bodies, and especially the most excellent powers, faculties, and capacities of human souls, do abundantly prove that there is a Creator, and that he is God. Or,

[2.]As the date of the discovery. It as old as the creation of the world. In this sense apo ktiseōs is most frequently used in scripture. These notices concerning God are not any modern discoveries, hit upon of late, but ancient truths, which were from the beginning. The way of the acknowledgement of God is a good old way; it was from the beginning. Truth got the start of error.

II.Their gross idolatry, notwithstanding these discoveries that God made to them of himself; described here, Rom 1:21-23, Rom 1:25.

We shall the less wonder at the inefficacy of these natural discoveries to prevent the idolatry of the Gentiles if we remember how prone even the Jews, who had scripture light to guide them, were to idolatry; so miserably are the degenerate sons of men plunged in the mire of sense. Observe,

1.The inward cause of their idolatry, Rom 1:21, Rom 1:22. They are therefore without excuse, in that they did know God, and from what they knew might easily infer that it was their duty to worship him, and him only. Though some have greater light and means of knowledge than others, yet all have enough to leave them inexcusable. But the mischief of it was that,

(1.)They glorified him not as God. Their affections towards him, and their awe and adoration of him, did not keep pace with their knowledge. To glorify him as God is to glorify him only; for there can be but one infinite: but they did not so glorify him, for they set up a multitude of other deities. To glorify him as God is to worship him with spiritual worship; but they made images of him. Not to glorify God as God is in effect not to glorify him at all; to respect him as a creature is not to glorify him, but to dishonour him.

(2.)Neither were they thankful; not thankful for the favours in general they received from God (insensibleness of God's mercies is at the bottom of our sinful departures from him); not thankful in particular for the discoveries God was pleased to make of himself to them. Those that do not improve the means of knowledge and grace are justly reckoned unthankful for them.

(3.)But they became vain in their imaginations, en tois dialogismois - in their reasonings, in their practical inferences. They had a great deal of knowledge of general truths (Rom 1:19), but no prudence to apply them to particular cases. Or, in their notions of God, and the creation of the world, and the origination of mankind, and the chief good; in these things, when they quitted the plain truth, they soon disputed themselves into a thousand vain and foolish fancies. The several opinions and hypotheses of the various sects of philosophers concerning these things were so many vain imaginations. When truth is forsaken, errors multiply in infinitum - infinitely.

(4.)And their foolish heart was darkened. The foolishness and practical wickedness of the heart cloud and darken the intellectual powers and faculties. Nothing tends more to the blinding and perverting of the understanding than the corruption and depravedness of the will and affections.

(5.)Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, Rom 1:22. This looks black upon the philosophers, the pretenders to wisdom and professors of it. Those that had the most luxuriant fancy, in framing to themselves the idea of a God, fell into the most gross and absurd conceits: and it was the just punishment of their pride and self-conceitedness. It has been observed that the most refined nations, that made the greatest show of wisdom, were the arrantest fools in religion. The barbarians adored the sun and moon, which of all others was the most specious idolatry; while the learned Egyptians worshipped an ox and an onion. The Grecians, who excelled them in wisdom, adored diseases and human passions. The Romans, the wisest of all, worshipped the furies. And at this day the poor Americans worship the thunder; while the ingenious Chinese adore the devil. Thus the world by wisdom knew not God, Co1 1:21. As a profession of wisdom is an aggravation of folly, so a proud conceit of wisdom is the cause of a great deal of folly. Hence we read of few philosophers who were converted to Christianity; and Paul's preaching was no where so laughed at and ridiculed as among the learned Athenians, Act 17:18-32. Phaskontes einai - conceiting themselves to be wise. The plain truth of the being of God would not content them; they thought themselves above that, and so fell into the greatest errors.

2.The outward acts of their idolatry, Rom 1:23-25.

(1.)Making images of God (Rom 1:23), by which, as much as in them lay, they changed the glory of the incorruptible God. Compare Psa 106:20; Jer 2:11. They ascribed a deity to the most contemptible creatures, and by them represented God. It was the greatest honour God did to man that he made man in the image of God; but it is the greatest dishonour man has done to God that he has made God in the image of man. This was what God so strictly warned the Jews against, Deu 4:15, etc. This the apostle shows the folly of in his sermon at Athens, Act 17:29. See Isa 40:18, etc.; Isa 44:10, etc. This is called (Rom 1:25) changing the truth of God into a lie. As it did dishonour his glory, so it did misrepresent his being. Idols are called lies, for they belie God, as if he had a body, whereas he is a Spirit, Jer 23:14; Hos 7:1. Teachers of lies, Hab 2:18.

(2.)Giving divine honour to the creature: Worshipped and served the creature, para ton ktisanta - besides the Creator. They did own a supreme Numen in their profession, but they did in effect disown him by the worship they paid to the creature; for God will be all or none. Or, above the Creator, paying more devout respect to their inferior deities, stars, heroes, demons, thinking the supreme God inaccessible, or above their worship. The sin itself was their worshipping the creature at all; but this is mentioned as an aggravation of the sin, that they worshipped the creature more than the Creator. This was the general wickedness of the Gentile world, and became twisted in with their laws and government; in compliance with which even the wise men among them, who knew and owned a supreme God and were convinced of the nonsense and absurdity of their polytheism and idolatry, yet did as the rest of their neighbours did. Seneca, in his book De Superstitione, as it is quoted by Aug. de Civit. Dei, lib. 6, cap. 10 (for the book itself is lost), after he had largely shown the great folly and impiety of the vulgar religion, in divers instances of it, yet concludes, Quae omnia sapiens servabit tanquam legibus jussa, non tanquam diis grata - All which a wise man will observe as established by law, not imagining them grateful to the gods. And afterwards, Omnem istam ignobilem deorum turbam, quam longo aevo longa superstitio congessit, sic adorabimus, ut meminerimus cultum ejus magis ad morem quam ad rem pertinere - All this ignoble rout of gods, which ancient superstition has amassed together by long prescription, we will so adore as to remember that the worship of them is rather a compliance with custom than material in itself. Upon which Augustine observes, Colebat quod reprehendebat, agebat quod arguebat, quod culpabat adorabat - He worshipped that which he censured, he did that which he had proved wrong, and he adored what he found fault with. I mention this thus largely because methinks it doth fully explain that of the apostle here (Rom 1:18): Who hold the truth in unrighteousness. It is observable that upon the mention of the dishonour done to God by the idolatry of the Gentiles the apostle, in the midst of his discourse, expresses himself in an awful adoration of God: Who is blessed for ever. Amen. When we see or hear of any contempt cast upon God or his name, we should thence take occasion to think and speak highly and honourably of him. In this, as in other things, the worse others are, the better we should be. Blessed for ever, notwithstanding these dishonours done to his name: though there are those that do not glorify him, yet he is glorified, and will be glorified to eternity.

III.The judgments of God upon them for this idolatry; not many temporal judgments (the idolatrous nations were the conquering ruling nations of the world), but spiritual judgments, giving them up to the most brutish and unnatural lusts. Paredōken autous - He gave them up; it is thrice repeated here, Rom 1:24, Rom 1:26, Rom 1:28. Spiritual judgments are of all judgments the sorest, and to be most dreaded. Observe,

1.By whom they were given up. God gave them up, in a way of righteous judgment, as the just punishment of their idolatry - taking off the bridle of restraining grace - leaving them to themselves - letting them alone; for his grace is his own, he is debtor to no man, he may give or withhold his grace at pleasure. Whether this giving up be a positive act of God or only privative we leave to the schools to dispute: but this we are sure of that it is no new thing for God to give men up to their own hearts' lusts, to send them strong delusions, to let Satan loose upon them, nay, to lay stumbling-blocks before them. And yet God is not the author of sin, but herein infinitely just and holy; for, though the greatest wickedness follow upon this giving up, the fault of that is to be laid upon the sinner's wicked heart. If the patient be obstinate, and will not submit to the methods prescribed, but wilfully takes and does that which is prejudicial to him, the physician is not to be blamed if he give him up as in a desperate condition; and all the fatal symptoms that follow are not to be imputed to the physician, but to the disease itself and to the folly and wilfulness of the patient.

2.To what they were given up.

(1.)To uncleanness and vile affections, Rom 1:24, Rom 1:26, Rom 1:27. Those that would not entertain the more pure and refined notices of natural light, which tend to preserve the honour of God, justly forfeited those more gross and palpable sentiments which preserve the honour of human nature. Man being in honour, and refusing to understand the God that made him, thus becomes worse than the beasts that perish, Psa 49:20. Thus one, by the divine permission, becomes the punishment of another; but it is (as it said here) through the lusts of their own hearts - there all the fault is to be laid. Those who dishonoured God were given up to dishonour themselves. A man cannot be delivered up to a greater slavery than to be given up to his own lusts. Such are given over, like the Egyptians (Isa 19:4), into the hand of a cruel lord. The particular instances of their uncleanness and vile affections are their unnatural lusts, for which many of the heathen, even of those among them who passed for wise men, as Solon and Zeno, were infamous, against the plainest and most obvious dictates of natural light. The crying iniquity of Sodom and Gomorrah, for which God rained hell from heaven upon them, became not only commonly practised, but avowed, in the pagan nations. Perhaps the apostle especially refers to the abominations that were committed in the worship of their idol-gods, in which the worst of uncleannesses were prescribed for the honour of their gods; dunghill service for dunghill gods: the unclean spirits delight in such ministrations. In the church of Rome, where the pagan idolatries are revived, images worshipped, and saints only substituted in the room of demons, we hear of these same abominations going barefaced, licensed by the pope (Fox's Acts and Monuments, vol. 1, p. 808), and not only commonly perpetrated, but justified and pleaded for by some of their cardinals: the same spiritual plagues for the same spiritual wickednesses. See what wickedness there is in the nature of man. How abominable and filthy is man! Lord, what is man? says David; what a vile creature is he when left to himself! How much are we beholden to the restraining grace of God for the preserving any thing of the honour and decency of the human nature! For, were it not for this, man, who was made but little lower than the angels, would make himself a great deal lower than the devils. This is said to be that recompence of their error which was meet. The Judge of all the earth does right, and observes a meetness between the sin and the punishment of it.

(2.)To a reprobate mind in these abominations, Rom 1:28.

[1.]They did not like to retain God in their knowledge. The blindness of their understandings was caused by the wilful aversion of their wills and affections. They did not retain God in their knowledge, because they did not like it. They would neither know nor do any thing but just what pleased themselves. It is just the temper of carnal hearts; the pleasing of themselves is their highest end. There are many that have God in their knowledge, they cannot help it, the light shines so fully in their faces; but they do not retain him there. They say to the Almighty, Depart (Job 21:14), and they therefore do not retain God in their knowledge because it thwarts and contradicts their lusts; they do not like it. In their knowledge - en epignōsei. There is a difference between gnōsis and epignōsis, the knowledge and the acknowledgement of God; the pagans knew God, but did not, would not, acknowledge him.

[2.]Answerable to this wilfulness of theirs, in gainsaying the truth, God gave them over to a wilfulness in the grossest sins, here called a reprobate mind - eis adokimon noun, a mind void of all sense and judgment to discern things that differ, so that they could not distinguish their right hand from their left in spiritual things. See whither a course of sin leads, and into what a gulf it plunges the sinner at last; hither fleshly lusts have a direct tendency. Eyes full of adultery cannot cease from sin, Pe2 2:14. This reprobate mind was a blind scared conscience, past feeling, Eph 4:19. When the judgment is once reconciled to sin, the man is in the suburbs of hell. At first Pharaoh hardened his heart, but afterwards God hardened Pharaoh's heart. Thus wilful hardness is justly punished with judicial hardness. - To do those things which are not convenient. This phrase may seem to bespeak a diminutive evil, but here it is expressive of the grossest enormities; things that are not agreeable to men, but contradict the very light and law of nature. And here he subjoins a black list of those unbecoming things which the Gentiles were guilty of, being delivered up to a reprobate mind. No wickedness so heinous, so contrary to the light of nature, to the law of nations, and to all the interests of mankind, but a reprobate mind will comply with it. By the histories of those times, especially the accounts we have of the then prevailing dispositions and practices of the Romans when the ancient virtue of that commonwealth was so degenerated, it appears that these sins here mentioned were then and there reigning national sins. No fewer than twenty-three several sorts of sins and sinners are here specified, Rom 1:29-31. Here the devil's seat is; his name is legion, for they are many. It was time to have the gospel preached among them, for the world had need of reformation.

First, Sins against the first table: Haters of God. Here is the devil in his own colours, sin appearing sin. Could it be imagined that rational creatures should hate the chief good, and depending creatures abhor the fountain of their being? And yet so it is. Every sin has in it a hatred of God; but some sinners are more open and avowed enemies to him than others, Zac 11:8. Proud men and boasters cope with God himself, and put those crowns upon their own heads which must be cast before his throne.

Secondly, Sins against the second table. These are especially mentioned, because in these things they had a clearer light. In general here is a charge of unrighteousness. This is put first, for every sin is unrighteousness; it is withholding that which is due, perverting that which is right; it is especially put for second-table sins, doing as we would not be done by. Against the fifth commandment: Disobedient to parents, and without natural affection - astorgous, that is parents unkind and cruel to their children. Thus, when duty fails on one side, it commonly fails on the other. Disobedient children are justly punished with unnatural parents; and, on the contrary, unnatural parents with disobedient children. Against the sixth commandment: Wickedness (doing mischief for mischief's sake), maliciousness, envy, murder, debate (eridos - contention), malignity, despiteful, implacable, unmerciful; all expressions of that hatred of our brother which is heart-murder. Against the seventh commandment: Fornication; he mentions no more, having spoken before of other uncleannesses. Against the eighth commandment: Unrighteousness, covetousness. Against the ninth commandment: Deceit, whisperers, back-biters, covenant-breakers, lying and slandering. Here are two generals not before mentioned - inventors of evil things, and without understanding; wise to do evil, and yet having no knowledge to do good. The more deliberate and politic sinners are in inventing evil things, the greater is their sin: so quick of invention in sin, and yet without understanding (stark fools) in the thoughts of God. Here is enough to humble us all, in the sense of our original corruption; for every heart by nature has in it the seed and spawn of all these sins. In the close he mentions the aggravations of the sins, Rom 1:32. 1. They knew the judgment of God; that is, (1.) They knew the law. The judgment of God is that which his justice requires, which, because he is just, he judgeth meet to be done. (2.) They knew the penalty; so it is explained here: They knew that those who commit such things were worthy of death, eternal death; their own consciences could not but suggest this to them, and yet they ventured upon it. It is a great aggravation of sin when it is committed against knowledge (Jam 4:17), especially against the knowledge of the judgment of God. It is daring presumption to run upon the sword's point. It argues the heart much hardened, and very resolutely set upon sin. 2. They not only do the same, but have pleasure in those that do them. The violence of some present temptation may hurry a man into the commission of such sins himself in which the vitiated appetite may take a pleasure; but to be pleased with other people's sins is to love sin for sin's sake: it is joining in a confederacy for the devil's kingdom and interest. Suneudokousi: they do not only commit sin, but they defend and justify it, and encourage others to do the like. Our own sins are much aggravated by our concurrence with, and complacency in, the sins of others.

Now lay all this together, and then say whether the Gentile world, lying under so much guilt and corruption, could be justified before God by any works of their own.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Four Centuries of Reception

11 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

11 quotes · AD 99–542
Ante-NicenePost-Nicene
100200300400500

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 223Callistus I of RomeAnte-Nicene
And therefore the laws not only of the Church, but of the world, condemn those who are guilty of this crime; and not only those indeed who actually conspire, but those also who take part with such.
AD 250Fabian of RomeAnte-Nicene
Such persons, therefore, are in all things to be guarded against, and are not to be received, because, according to the apostle, not only those who commit such things are condemned, but also those who consent with those who do them.
AD 379Basil of CaesareaPost-NiceneSourceON THE JUDGMENT OF GOD
Perverted human tradition is the source of great evil for us, in that some sins are denounced while others are viewed with indifference. Crimes like homicide and adultery are the object of a violent but feigned indignation while others, like anger, reviling, drunkenness or avarice, are not considered deserving of even a simple admonition.
AD 382Apollinaris of LaodiceaPost-NiceneSourcePAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Here again we see the innocence of God and the guilt of man and the justice of the judgment which is brought. For men do these things, not being unaware that they are worthy of punishment by God the judge. For it is clear that they are not unaware of this when they judge others and hand those who do such things over to death. For when evil men have knowledge of the good and make use of it as if they are not given over to pleasures, they bear witness that God’s creation is good.… But those who lead men into wrong, as well as those who follow what is wrong, are both evil.
AD 384AmbrosiasterPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES
Those who knew by the law of nature that God requires righteousness realized that these things were displeasing to God, but they did not want to think about it, because those who do such things are worthy of death, and not only those who do them but those who allow them to be done, for consent is participation. Their wickedness is double, for those who do such things but prevent others are not so bad, because they realize that these things are evil and do not justify them. But the worst people are those who do these things and approve of others doing them as well, not fearing God but desiring the increase of evil. They do not seek to justify them either, but in their case it is because they want to persuade people that there is nothing wrong in doing them.
AD 407John ChrysostomPost-NiceneSourceHomily on Romans 5
"Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death. not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them." Having assumed here two objections, he in the first place removes them. For what reason have you to say, he means, that you know not the things which ought to be done? At best, even if you did not know, you are to blame in having left God who instructs you. But as it is by many arguments we have shown that you do know, and transgress willingly. But are you drawn by passion? Why then do you both cooperate therewith and praise it? For they "not only do such things," he says, "but have pleasure in them that do them." Having then put the more grievous and the unpardonable sin first, that he might have done with it (for he that praiseth the sin is far worse than even he that trespasseth); having then put this the first, he by this method grapples more powerfully with him in the sequel.
AD 418PelagiusPost-NiceneSourcePELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS
Even people who did not agree with these doings … nevertheless seem to have accepted them, because they agreed to idolatry, which is the source and cause of them all.
AD 425Severian of GabalaPost-NiceneSourcePAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
When Paul talks about the “judgment of God” he means the just recompense which God gives to everyone according to their deserts. For men know by their natural reasoning that transgressors will be punished by God, but instead of ceasing from their wicked ways they are actually pleased with those who do such things!… Therefore God will judge those who do such things as absolutely and without question worthy of death.
AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourceAUGUSTINE ON ROMANS 7-8
Whatever they had done they did without compulsion. For when they give their consent to evil deeds, they approve even of things which they did not do themselves.
AD 542Caesarius of ArlesPost-NiceneSourceSERMON 42.2
Those who do not admonish adulterers make us suspect that the reason for this failure of reproof is that they commit similar sins themselves.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Romans 1:32 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.