Skip to content
“The Necessity of the Gospel: God’s Wrath Against Sin”· Romans 1:18–32
Translation
King James Version
Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Without understanding G801, covenantbreakers G802, without natural affection G794, implacable G786, unmerciful G415:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
they are brainless, faithless, heartless and ruthless.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
They are senseless, faithless, heartless, merciless.
Ask
American Standard Version
without understanding, covenant-breakers, without natural affection, unmerciful:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
without understanding, covenant breakers, without natural affection, unforgiving, unmerciful;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Which men, though they knew ye Lawe of God, how that they which comit such things are worthie of death, yet not onely do the same, but also fauour them that doe them.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
unintelligent, faithless, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 27,962 of 31,102 · 89.9%

Study This Verse

Summary

Romans 1:31 is a poignant segment of Paul's comprehensive indictment of humanity's rebellion against God, detailing a further descent into moral depravity as a consequence of suppressing divine truth and engaging in idolatry. This verse, part of a chilling catalogue of vices, illuminates the profound breakdown of human relationships and societal order when people are abandoned to their fallen desires, manifesting in a rejection of wisdom, faithfulness, natural affection, reconciliation, and compassion.

Context

Literary Context

Romans 1:31 is situated within Paul's powerful theological argument in Romans 1, specifically within the section (verses 18-32) that outlines God's wrath against human ungodliness and unrighteousness. Having established that humanity has willfully rejected the clear revelation of God in creation (verses 19-20) and exchanged His glory for idolatry (verses 21-23), Paul describes a threefold divine "giving over" (παρέδωκεν, paredōken) of humanity to its sinful desires: first to impurity (verse 24), then to dishonorable passions (verse 26), and finally to a "debased mind" (ἀδόκιμον νοῦν, adokimon noun) in verse 28. The list of vices that follows, beginning in Romans 1:29, serves as a vivid illustration of the practical outworking of this debased mind, with verse 31 specifically highlighting relational and ethical failures that undermine societal bonds.

Historical & Cultural Context

Paul's audience in Rome included both Jewish and Gentile believers, living in the heart of the Roman Empire. Roman society, while valuing order and law, was also characterized by widespread paganism, moral relativism, and significant social stratification. The vices listed by Paul, such as lack of natural affection and implacability, were not uncommon in a culture where infanticide, abandonment of children, and gladiatorial contests were accepted, and where personal loyalty often superseded broader ethical considerations. Paul's catalogue of sins in Romans 1 would have resonated with both Jewish critiques of Gentile immorality and with the philosophical concerns of some Roman moralists who lamented the decline of traditional virtues. However, Paul's unique contribution is to root this moral decay not merely in cultural decline but in a fundamental theological rebellion against the Creator, contrasting sharply with the ethical demands of the God of Israel and the nascent Christian community.

Key Themes

Romans 1:31 contributes significantly to several overarching themes in the book of Romans. Primarily, it underscores the theme of human depravity and the pervasive nature of sin, demonstrating that sin affects not only one's relationship with God but also one's relationships with other humans, leading to social disintegration. It highlights the consequences of rejecting God's truth, showing how a spiritual turning away from the Creator inevitably leads to moral corruption and a "debased mind" (Romans 1:28). The verse also implicitly sets the stage for the necessity of God's righteousness (δικαιοσύνη θεοῦ, dikaiosynē theou), a central theme introduced in Romans 1:17, as it demonstrates humanity's utter inability to achieve righteousness on its own, thereby necessitating salvation through faith in Christ. The catalogue of vices also serves as a stark contrast to the fruit of the Spirit described elsewhere, such as love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control (Galatians 5:22-23), illustrating the difference between a life given over to sin and a life transformed by God.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Without understanding asýnetos G801

Meaning "unintelligent; by implication, wicked." This is not merely a lack of intellectual capacity, but a spiritual inability or unwillingness to grasp divine truth and its moral implications. It points to a mind that is not discerning or wise concerning God's ways, leading to foolish and ungodly behavior. This intellectual dullness is a consequence of suppressing the truth about God.

Covenantbreakers asýnthetos G802

Meaning "properly, not agreed, i.e. treacherous to compacts." This term signifies a profound lack of faithfulness and trustworthiness. It refers to those who disregard solemn agreements, whether with God or with fellow humans. In a biblical context, covenant-breaking is a grave offense, indicative of a deep moral failing that undermines the very fabric of trust and community.

Without natural affection ástorgos G794

Meaning "hard-hearted towards kindred." This word describes a deficiency in the instinctive, familial love (storge) that should exist between family members, parents and children, or close relations. It highlights a breakdown in the most fundamental human relationships, pointing to a severe moral corruption where even basic human kindness and empathy towards one's own kin are absent.

Verse Breakdown

"Without understanding"

This phrase describes a spiritual and moral blindness, an inability or unwillingness to comprehend divine truth and its implications for ethical living. It's not merely ignorance, but a deliberate suppression of the knowledge of God, leading to foolish decisions and a distorted worldview.

"covenantbreakers"

This refers to those who are faithless and unreliable in their commitments. They disregard agreements, oaths, and promises, whether formal or informal, with God or with other people. This trait signifies a profound lack of integrity and trustworthiness, eroding the foundations of social trust and order.

"without natural affection"

This powerful phrase points to a severe perversion of human nature, specifically the absence of the innate love and tenderness that should bind families and close relations. It indicates a cold, callous disregard for those with whom one should have the deepest bonds, reflecting a profound moral decay at the very core of human relationships.

"implacable"

This term describes those who are unwilling to be appeased, reconciled, or to make peace. They hold onto resentment, hostility, and bitterness, refusing to resolve conflicts or forgive. This characteristic highlights an unyielding spirit that prevents harmony and perpetuates strife.

"unmerciful"

This final descriptor signifies a complete lack of compassion, pity, or empathy towards others, especially those who are suffering or in need. It speaks of a hard-heartedness that refuses to extend kindness or grace, demonstrating an absence of the very quality that God Himself abundantly demonstrates towards humanity.

Literary Devices

Paul's use of a catalogue of vices in Romans 1:29-31 is a powerful rhetorical device, creating a cumulative effect that emphasizes the pervasive and multifaceted nature of human sin when separated from God. The rapid-fire listing, often without conjunctions (asyndeton), creates a sense of overwhelming moral decay and the relentless downward spiral of a debased mind. The repeated use of the alpha-privative (the Greek prefix "a-" or "an-," meaning "without" or "not") in words like asýnetos, asýnthetos, ástorgos, áspondos, and aneleḗmōn functions as a form of anaphora (though not strictly at the beginning of clauses, but as a recurring negative prefix), underscoring the absence of essential virtues and the negation of what is good and godly. This highlights a fundamental deficit in character, rather than merely isolated acts of sin. Furthermore, the entire list serves as a stark juxtaposition to the character of God and the virtues that the Holy Spirit produces in believers, implicitly contrasting the darkness of sin with the light of righteousness.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Romans 1:31 paints a grim picture of humanity's moral landscape when God's truth is rejected. Theologically, these vices are not random failings but direct consequences of humanity's idolatry and suppression of truth, revealing the depth of the fall and the pervasive nature of sin. The absence of understanding, the breaking of covenants, and the lack of natural affection and mercy demonstrate a fundamental breakdown in both vertical (God-human) and horizontal (human-human) relationships. This moral decay underscores the biblical teaching that true wisdom, faithfulness, love, and compassion flow from a right relationship with God. Without Him, humanity inevitably descends into a state characterized by these destructive traits, highlighting the urgent need for divine intervention and the transformative power of the Gospel. These characteristics stand in stark contrast to the virtues found in God's own character and those called for in His people, particularly under the New Covenant.

Reflection and Application

Paul's stark description in Romans 1:31 serves as a powerful mirror, inviting us to examine the state of our own hearts and the societies we inhabit. It reminds us that true moral health and relational integrity are not merely matters of human effort or cultural norms, but are deeply rooted in our orientation towards God. The absence of understanding, the propensity to break commitments, the chilling lack of natural affection, and the refusal to reconcile or show mercy are not just ancient vices; they are ever-present dangers that threaten to corrupt our personal lives, families, and communities. This passage challenges us to consider whether we are truly seeking God's wisdom, upholding our commitments, cultivating genuine love and compassion, and extending forgiveness and mercy. It compels us to recognize our own vulnerability to these sinful patterns and to humbly seek the transforming grace of God, which alone can replace these destructive traits with the virtues of Christ.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what areas of my life might I be "without understanding" of God's truth, leading to foolish choices or a distorted worldview?
  2. Am I a "covenantbreaker" in my relationships, failing to uphold commitments or demonstrate faithfulness to God and others?
  3. How does the concept of being "without natural affection" challenge me to cultivate deeper love and empathy within my family and community?
  4. Do I exhibit an "implacable" spirit, holding onto resentment or refusing to reconcile, or do I actively pursue peace and forgiveness?
  5. In what ways can I grow in being "unmerciful," extending compassion and grace to those in need, especially when it is difficult?

FAQ

Does this list of vices apply only to non-believers, or can Christians also exhibit these traits?

While Paul's immediate context in Romans 1 describes the consequences of humanity's rejection of God, the vices listed are universal manifestations of human sinfulness. Christians, though redeemed and indwelt by the Holy Spirit, are still in a process of sanctification and can struggle with these very issues. The New Testament frequently warns believers against such behaviors (e.g., Galatians 5:19-21, Ephesians 4:31-32). The difference lies in the Christian's access to the Holy Spirit, who empowers them to overcome these sinful inclinations and to grow in the opposite virtues, such as love, understanding, and mercy (Galatians 5:22-23).

How can someone who exhibits these traits find transformation?

Paul's entire argument in Romans leads to the glorious solution found in Jesus Christ. The transformation from a life characterized by these vices to one marked by righteousness and love comes through the Gospel. It begins with acknowledging one's sinfulness, repenting, and putting faith in Jesus Christ, whose atoning death and resurrection provide forgiveness and a new life (Romans 3:23-26). Through the indwelling Holy Spirit, believers are empowered to put off the old self and put on the new self (Ephesians 4:22-24), cultivating understanding, faithfulness, natural affection, reconciliation, and mercy, which are the fruit of a life submitted to God (Galatians 5:22-23).

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Romans 1:31 vividly portrays the depths of human depravity and the relational brokenness that results from humanity's rebellion against God. In stark contrast to these vices, Jesus Christ embodies perfect understanding, unwavering faithfulness, boundless natural affection (agape love), complete reconciliation, and infinite mercy. He is the ultimate fulfillment of all that humanity lacks. Where humanity is "without understanding," Christ is the very wisdom of God (1 Corinthians 1:24). Where humanity proves to be "covenantbreakers," Jesus is the faithful Son who perfectly upholds the New Covenant, sealing it with His own blood (Hebrews 8:6, Hebrews 9:15). In a world "without natural affection," Christ demonstrates the purest form of self-sacrificial love, laying down His life for His friends and even His enemies (John 15:13, Romans 5:8). Instead of being "implacable," Jesus came to be the ultimate reconciler, breaking down the wall of hostility between God and humanity, and between people groups (Ephesians 2:14-16). And far from being "unmerciful," His entire ministry was a testament to divine compassion, culminating in His cry from the cross, "Father, forgive them" (Luke 23:34). Through His death and resurrection, Christ offers transformation, enabling those who were once characterized by these vices to be renewed by the Holy Spirit, reflecting His understanding, faithfulness, love, and mercy, thereby fulfilling God's original design for humanity.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Romans 1:19–32. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 14 verses
Passage under commentRomans 1:19–32
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

In this last part of the chapter the apostle applies what he had said particularly to the Gentile world, in which we may observe,

I.The means and helps they had to come to the knowledge of God.

Though they had not such a knowledge of his law as Jacob and Israel had (Psa 147:20), yet among them he left not himself without witness (Act 14:17): For that which may be known, etc., Rom 1:19, Rom 1:20. Observe,

1.What discoveries they had: That which may be known of God is manifest, en autois - among them; that is, there were some even among them that had the knowledge of God, were convinced of the existence of one supreme Numen. The philosophy of Pythagoras, Plato, and the Stoics, discovered a great deal of the knowledge of God, as appears by abundance of testimonies. That which may be known, which implies that there is a great deal which may not be known. The being of God may be apprehended, but cannot be comprehended. We cannot by searching find him out, Job 11:7-9. Finite understandings cannot perfectly know an infinite being; but, blessed be God, there is that which may be known, enough to lead us to our chief end, the glorifying and enjoying of him; and these things revealed belong to us and to our children, while secret things are not to be pried into, Deu 29:29.

2.Whence they had these discoveries: God hath shown it to them. Those common natural notions which they had of God were imprinted upon their hearts by the God of nature himself, who is the Father of lights. This sense of a Deity, and a regard to that Deity, are so connate with the human nature that some think we are to distinguish men from brutes by these rather than by reason.

3.By what way and means these discoveries and notices which they had were confirmed and improved, namely, by the work of creation (Rom 1:20); For the invisible things of God, etc.

(1.)Observe what they knew: The invisible things of him, even his eternal power and Godhead. Though God be not the object of sense, yet he hath discovered and made known himself by those things that are sensible. The power and Godhead of God are invisible things, and yet are clearly seen in their products. He works in secret (Job 23:8, Job 23:9; Psa 139:15; Ecc 11:5), but manifests what he has wrought, and therein makes known his power and Godhead, and others of his attributes which natural light apprehends in the idea of a God. They could not come by natural light to the knowledge of the three persons in the Godhead (though some fancy they have found footsteps of this in Plato's writings), but they did come to the knowledge of the Godhead, at least so much knowledge as was sufficient to have kept them from idolatry. This was that truth which they held in unrighteousness.

(2.)How they knew it: By the things that are made, which could not make themselves, nor fall into such an exact order and harmony by any casual hits; and therefore must have been produced by some first cause or intelligent agent, which first cause could be no other than an eternal powerful God. See Psa 19:1; Isa 40:26; Act 17:24. The workman is known by his work. The variety, multitude, order, beauty, harmony, different nature, and excellent contrivance, of the things that are made, the direction of them to certain ends, and the concurrence of all the parts to the good and beauty of the whole, do abundantly prove a Creator and his eternal power and Godhead. Thus did the light shine in the darkness. And this from the creation of the world. Understand it either,

[1.]As the topic from which the knowledge of them is drawn. To evince this truth, we have recourse to the great work of creation. And some think this ktisis kosmou, this creature of the world (as it may be read), is to be understood of man, the ktisis kat' exochēn - the most remarkable creature of the lower world, called ktisis, Mar 16:15. The frame and structure of human bodies, and especially the most excellent powers, faculties, and capacities of human souls, do abundantly prove that there is a Creator, and that he is God. Or,

[2.]As the date of the discovery. It as old as the creation of the world. In this sense apo ktiseōs is most frequently used in scripture. These notices concerning God are not any modern discoveries, hit upon of late, but ancient truths, which were from the beginning. The way of the acknowledgement of God is a good old way; it was from the beginning. Truth got the start of error.

II.Their gross idolatry, notwithstanding these discoveries that God made to them of himself; described here, Rom 1:21-23, Rom 1:25.

We shall the less wonder at the inefficacy of these natural discoveries to prevent the idolatry of the Gentiles if we remember how prone even the Jews, who had scripture light to guide them, were to idolatry; so miserably are the degenerate sons of men plunged in the mire of sense. Observe,

1.The inward cause of their idolatry, Rom 1:21, Rom 1:22. They are therefore without excuse, in that they did know God, and from what they knew might easily infer that it was their duty to worship him, and him only. Though some have greater light and means of knowledge than others, yet all have enough to leave them inexcusable. But the mischief of it was that,

(1.)They glorified him not as God. Their affections towards him, and their awe and adoration of him, did not keep pace with their knowledge. To glorify him as God is to glorify him only; for there can be but one infinite: but they did not so glorify him, for they set up a multitude of other deities. To glorify him as God is to worship him with spiritual worship; but they made images of him. Not to glorify God as God is in effect not to glorify him at all; to respect him as a creature is not to glorify him, but to dishonour him.

(2.)Neither were they thankful; not thankful for the favours in general they received from God (insensibleness of God's mercies is at the bottom of our sinful departures from him); not thankful in particular for the discoveries God was pleased to make of himself to them. Those that do not improve the means of knowledge and grace are justly reckoned unthankful for them.

(3.)But they became vain in their imaginations, en tois dialogismois - in their reasonings, in their practical inferences. They had a great deal of knowledge of general truths (Rom 1:19), but no prudence to apply them to particular cases. Or, in their notions of God, and the creation of the world, and the origination of mankind, and the chief good; in these things, when they quitted the plain truth, they soon disputed themselves into a thousand vain and foolish fancies. The several opinions and hypotheses of the various sects of philosophers concerning these things were so many vain imaginations. When truth is forsaken, errors multiply in infinitum - infinitely.

(4.)And their foolish heart was darkened. The foolishness and practical wickedness of the heart cloud and darken the intellectual powers and faculties. Nothing tends more to the blinding and perverting of the understanding than the corruption and depravedness of the will and affections.

(5.)Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, Rom 1:22. This looks black upon the philosophers, the pretenders to wisdom and professors of it. Those that had the most luxuriant fancy, in framing to themselves the idea of a God, fell into the most gross and absurd conceits: and it was the just punishment of their pride and self-conceitedness. It has been observed that the most refined nations, that made the greatest show of wisdom, were the arrantest fools in religion. The barbarians adored the sun and moon, which of all others was the most specious idolatry; while the learned Egyptians worshipped an ox and an onion. The Grecians, who excelled them in wisdom, adored diseases and human passions. The Romans, the wisest of all, worshipped the furies. And at this day the poor Americans worship the thunder; while the ingenious Chinese adore the devil. Thus the world by wisdom knew not God, Co1 1:21. As a profession of wisdom is an aggravation of folly, so a proud conceit of wisdom is the cause of a great deal of folly. Hence we read of few philosophers who were converted to Christianity; and Paul's preaching was no where so laughed at and ridiculed as among the learned Athenians, Act 17:18-32. Phaskontes einai - conceiting themselves to be wise. The plain truth of the being of God would not content them; they thought themselves above that, and so fell into the greatest errors.

2.The outward acts of their idolatry, Rom 1:23-25.

(1.)Making images of God (Rom 1:23), by which, as much as in them lay, they changed the glory of the incorruptible God. Compare Psa 106:20; Jer 2:11. They ascribed a deity to the most contemptible creatures, and by them represented God. It was the greatest honour God did to man that he made man in the image of God; but it is the greatest dishonour man has done to God that he has made God in the image of man. This was what God so strictly warned the Jews against, Deu 4:15, etc. This the apostle shows the folly of in his sermon at Athens, Act 17:29. See Isa 40:18, etc.; Isa 44:10, etc. This is called (Rom 1:25) changing the truth of God into a lie. As it did dishonour his glory, so it did misrepresent his being. Idols are called lies, for they belie God, as if he had a body, whereas he is a Spirit, Jer 23:14; Hos 7:1. Teachers of lies, Hab 2:18.

(2.)Giving divine honour to the creature: Worshipped and served the creature, para ton ktisanta - besides the Creator. They did own a supreme Numen in their profession, but they did in effect disown him by the worship they paid to the creature; for God will be all or none. Or, above the Creator, paying more devout respect to their inferior deities, stars, heroes, demons, thinking the supreme God inaccessible, or above their worship. The sin itself was their worshipping the creature at all; but this is mentioned as an aggravation of the sin, that they worshipped the creature more than the Creator. This was the general wickedness of the Gentile world, and became twisted in with their laws and government; in compliance with which even the wise men among them, who knew and owned a supreme God and were convinced of the nonsense and absurdity of their polytheism and idolatry, yet did as the rest of their neighbours did. Seneca, in his book De Superstitione, as it is quoted by Aug. de Civit. Dei, lib. 6, cap. 10 (for the book itself is lost), after he had largely shown the great folly and impiety of the vulgar religion, in divers instances of it, yet concludes, Quae omnia sapiens servabit tanquam legibus jussa, non tanquam diis grata - All which a wise man will observe as established by law, not imagining them grateful to the gods. And afterwards, Omnem istam ignobilem deorum turbam, quam longo aevo longa superstitio congessit, sic adorabimus, ut meminerimus cultum ejus magis ad morem quam ad rem pertinere - All this ignoble rout of gods, which ancient superstition has amassed together by long prescription, we will so adore as to remember that the worship of them is rather a compliance with custom than material in itself. Upon which Augustine observes, Colebat quod reprehendebat, agebat quod arguebat, quod culpabat adorabat - He worshipped that which he censured, he did that which he had proved wrong, and he adored what he found fault with. I mention this thus largely because methinks it doth fully explain that of the apostle here (Rom 1:18): Who hold the truth in unrighteousness. It is observable that upon the mention of the dishonour done to God by the idolatry of the Gentiles the apostle, in the midst of his discourse, expresses himself in an awful adoration of God: Who is blessed for ever. Amen. When we see or hear of any contempt cast upon God or his name, we should thence take occasion to think and speak highly and honourably of him. In this, as in other things, the worse others are, the better we should be. Blessed for ever, notwithstanding these dishonours done to his name: though there are those that do not glorify him, yet he is glorified, and will be glorified to eternity.

III.The judgments of God upon them for this idolatry; not many temporal judgments (the idolatrous nations were the conquering ruling nations of the world), but spiritual judgments, giving them up to the most brutish and unnatural lusts. Paredōken autous - He gave them up; it is thrice repeated here, Rom 1:24, Rom 1:26, Rom 1:28. Spiritual judgments are of all judgments the sorest, and to be most dreaded. Observe,

1.By whom they were given up. God gave them up, in a way of righteous judgment, as the just punishment of their idolatry - taking off the bridle of restraining grace - leaving them to themselves - letting them alone; for his grace is his own, he is debtor to no man, he may give or withhold his grace at pleasure. Whether this giving up be a positive act of God or only privative we leave to the schools to dispute: but this we are sure of that it is no new thing for God to give men up to their own hearts' lusts, to send them strong delusions, to let Satan loose upon them, nay, to lay stumbling-blocks before them. And yet God is not the author of sin, but herein infinitely just and holy; for, though the greatest wickedness follow upon this giving up, the fault of that is to be laid upon the sinner's wicked heart. If the patient be obstinate, and will not submit to the methods prescribed, but wilfully takes and does that which is prejudicial to him, the physician is not to be blamed if he give him up as in a desperate condition; and all the fatal symptoms that follow are not to be imputed to the physician, but to the disease itself and to the folly and wilfulness of the patient.

2.To what they were given up.

(1.)To uncleanness and vile affections, Rom 1:24, Rom 1:26, Rom 1:27. Those that would not entertain the more pure and refined notices of natural light, which tend to preserve the honour of God, justly forfeited those more gross and palpable sentiments which preserve the honour of human nature. Man being in honour, and refusing to understand the God that made him, thus becomes worse than the beasts that perish, Psa 49:20. Thus one, by the divine permission, becomes the punishment of another; but it is (as it said here) through the lusts of their own hearts - there all the fault is to be laid. Those who dishonoured God were given up to dishonour themselves. A man cannot be delivered up to a greater slavery than to be given up to his own lusts. Such are given over, like the Egyptians (Isa 19:4), into the hand of a cruel lord. The particular instances of their uncleanness and vile affections are their unnatural lusts, for which many of the heathen, even of those among them who passed for wise men, as Solon and Zeno, were infamous, against the plainest and most obvious dictates of natural light. The crying iniquity of Sodom and Gomorrah, for which God rained hell from heaven upon them, became not only commonly practised, but avowed, in the pagan nations. Perhaps the apostle especially refers to the abominations that were committed in the worship of their idol-gods, in which the worst of uncleannesses were prescribed for the honour of their gods; dunghill service for dunghill gods: the unclean spirits delight in such ministrations. In the church of Rome, where the pagan idolatries are revived, images worshipped, and saints only substituted in the room of demons, we hear of these same abominations going barefaced, licensed by the pope (Fox's Acts and Monuments, vol. 1, p. 808), and not only commonly perpetrated, but justified and pleaded for by some of their cardinals: the same spiritual plagues for the same spiritual wickednesses. See what wickedness there is in the nature of man. How abominable and filthy is man! Lord, what is man? says David; what a vile creature is he when left to himself! How much are we beholden to the restraining grace of God for the preserving any thing of the honour and decency of the human nature! For, were it not for this, man, who was made but little lower than the angels, would make himself a great deal lower than the devils. This is said to be that recompence of their error which was meet. The Judge of all the earth does right, and observes a meetness between the sin and the punishment of it.

(2.)To a reprobate mind in these abominations, Rom 1:28.

[1.]They did not like to retain God in their knowledge. The blindness of their understandings was caused by the wilful aversion of their wills and affections. They did not retain God in their knowledge, because they did not like it. They would neither know nor do any thing but just what pleased themselves. It is just the temper of carnal hearts; the pleasing of themselves is their highest end. There are many that have God in their knowledge, they cannot help it, the light shines so fully in their faces; but they do not retain him there. They say to the Almighty, Depart (Job 21:14), and they therefore do not retain God in their knowledge because it thwarts and contradicts their lusts; they do not like it. In their knowledge - en epignōsei. There is a difference between gnōsis and epignōsis, the knowledge and the acknowledgement of God; the pagans knew God, but did not, would not, acknowledge him.

[2.]Answerable to this wilfulness of theirs, in gainsaying the truth, God gave them over to a wilfulness in the grossest sins, here called a reprobate mind - eis adokimon noun, a mind void of all sense and judgment to discern things that differ, so that they could not distinguish their right hand from their left in spiritual things. See whither a course of sin leads, and into what a gulf it plunges the sinner at last; hither fleshly lusts have a direct tendency. Eyes full of adultery cannot cease from sin, Pe2 2:14. This reprobate mind was a blind scared conscience, past feeling, Eph 4:19. When the judgment is once reconciled to sin, the man is in the suburbs of hell. At first Pharaoh hardened his heart, but afterwards God hardened Pharaoh's heart. Thus wilful hardness is justly punished with judicial hardness. - To do those things which are not convenient. This phrase may seem to bespeak a diminutive evil, but here it is expressive of the grossest enormities; things that are not agreeable to men, but contradict the very light and law of nature. And here he subjoins a black list of those unbecoming things which the Gentiles were guilty of, being delivered up to a reprobate mind. No wickedness so heinous, so contrary to the light of nature, to the law of nations, and to all the interests of mankind, but a reprobate mind will comply with it. By the histories of those times, especially the accounts we have of the then prevailing dispositions and practices of the Romans when the ancient virtue of that commonwealth was so degenerated, it appears that these sins here mentioned were then and there reigning national sins. No fewer than twenty-three several sorts of sins and sinners are here specified, Rom 1:29-31. Here the devil's seat is; his name is legion, for they are many. It was time to have the gospel preached among them, for the world had need of reformation.

First, Sins against the first table: Haters of God. Here is the devil in his own colours, sin appearing sin. Could it be imagined that rational creatures should hate the chief good, and depending creatures abhor the fountain of their being? And yet so it is. Every sin has in it a hatred of God; but some sinners are more open and avowed enemies to him than others, Zac 11:8. Proud men and boasters cope with God himself, and put those crowns upon their own heads which must be cast before his throne.

Secondly, Sins against the second table. These are especially mentioned, because in these things they had a clearer light. In general here is a charge of unrighteousness. This is put first, for every sin is unrighteousness; it is withholding that which is due, perverting that which is right; it is especially put for second-table sins, doing as we would not be done by. Against the fifth commandment: Disobedient to parents, and without natural affection - astorgous, that is parents unkind and cruel to their children. Thus, when duty fails on one side, it commonly fails on the other. Disobedient children are justly punished with unnatural parents; and, on the contrary, unnatural parents with disobedient children. Against the sixth commandment: Wickedness (doing mischief for mischief's sake), maliciousness, envy, murder, debate (eridos - contention), malignity, despiteful, implacable, unmerciful; all expressions of that hatred of our brother which is heart-murder. Against the seventh commandment: Fornication; he mentions no more, having spoken before of other uncleannesses. Against the eighth commandment: Unrighteousness, covetousness. Against the ninth commandment: Deceit, whisperers, back-biters, covenant-breakers, lying and slandering. Here are two generals not before mentioned - inventors of evil things, and without understanding; wise to do evil, and yet having no knowledge to do good. The more deliberate and politic sinners are in inventing evil things, the greater is their sin: so quick of invention in sin, and yet without understanding (stark fools) in the thoughts of God. Here is enough to humble us all, in the sense of our original corruption; for every heart by nature has in it the seed and spawn of all these sins. In the close he mentions the aggravations of the sins, Rom 1:32. 1. They knew the judgment of God; that is, (1.) They knew the law. The judgment of God is that which his justice requires, which, because he is just, he judgeth meet to be done. (2.) They knew the penalty; so it is explained here: They knew that those who commit such things were worthy of death, eternal death; their own consciences could not but suggest this to them, and yet they ventured upon it. It is a great aggravation of sin when it is committed against knowledge (Jam 4:17), especially against the knowledge of the judgment of God. It is daring presumption to run upon the sword's point. It argues the heart much hardened, and very resolutely set upon sin. 2. They not only do the same, but have pleasure in those that do them. The violence of some present temptation may hurry a man into the commission of such sins himself in which the vitiated appetite may take a pleasure; but to be pleased with other people's sins is to love sin for sin's sake: it is joining in a confederacy for the devil's kingdom and interest. Suneudokousi: they do not only commit sin, but they defend and justify it, and encourage others to do the like. Our own sins are much aggravated by our concurrence with, and complacency in, the sins of others.

Now lay all this together, and then say whether the Gentile world, lying under so much guilt and corruption, could be justified before God by any works of their own.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

3 quotes · AD 384–418
Post-Nicene
400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 384AmbrosiasterPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES
They were foolish and faithless and had no feelings either for God or for men. That is why they were heartless and ruthless. For someone who is cruel to his own family will be that much more cruel to others!
AD 407John ChrysostomPost-NiceneSourceHomily on Romans 5
"Without natural affection, implacable." For this Christ Himself also pronounces to be the cause of wickedness, saying, "When iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold." (Matt. xxiv. 12). This too St. Paul here says, calling them "covenant-breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful," and showing that they were traitors even to the gift of nature. For we have a sort of family feeling even by nature towards one another, which even beasts have got towards each other. "For every beast," it says, "loveth his like, and every man his neighbor." (Ecclus. xiii. 15.) But these became more ferocious even than they. The disorder then which resulted to the world by evil doctrines, he proves to us by these witnesses, and clearly shows that the malady in either case came of the negligence of them that were disordered. He shows besides, what he did in the case of the doctrines, that they were here also deprived of all excuse; and so he says,
AD 418PelagiusPost-NiceneSourcePELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS
Paul mentions all these sins, set out one by one, with respect to those who have been abandoned by God because they have abandoned him. Let us therefore take care, lest we also be abandoned for embracing one of these evils.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Romans 1:31 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.