TRV
“Jesus Before Pilate”· Matthew 27:11–25
Translation
King James Version
And when he was accused of the chief priests and elders, he answered nothing.
Complete Jewish Bible
But when he was accused by the head cohanim and elders, he gave no answer.
Berean Standard Bible
And when He was accused by the chief priests and elders, He gave no answer.
American Standard Version
And when he was accused by the chief priests and elders, he answered nothing.
World English Bible Messianic
When he was accused by the chief priests and elders, he answered nothing.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when he was accused of the chiefe Priestes, and Elders, he answered nothing.
Young's Literal Translation
And in his being accused by the chief priests and the elders, he did not answer any thing,
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 24,142 of 31,102 · 77.6%
LawLawHistoryHistPoetryPoetProphetsProphNew TestamentNT
Study This Verse
Copy as
Historical interpretation
Two Centuries of Reception
8 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Ante-NicenePost-Nicene
300400
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Neither then nor now did Jesus make any reply to their accusations, for the word of God was not sent to them, as it was formerly to the Prophets. Neither was Pilate worthy of an answer, as he had no fixed or abiding opinion of Christ, but veered about to contradictory suppositions. Hearest thou not how many things they witness against thee?
Or, when asked by the High Priest whether He were Jesus the Christ, He answered, Thou hast said, because He had ever maintained out of the Law that Christ should come, but to Pilate who was ignorant of the Law, and asks if He were the King of the Jews, He answers, Thou sayest, because the salvation of the Gentiles is through faith of that present confession.
To Pilate’s question as to whether he was king of the Jews, he answered, “It is as you say.” How different was the statement he had made to the priest! When the latter asked him whether he was the Christ, he said, “You have said it yourself.” This answer is given to the priest as though pertaining to the past, for in many places the law had foretold the coming of the Christ.
Seest thou what He is first asked? which thing most of all they were continually bringing forward in every way? For since they saw Pilate making no account of the matters of the law, they direct their accusation to the state charges. So likewise did they in the case of the apostles, ever bringing forward these things, and saying that they were going about proclaiming king one Jesus, speaking as of a mere man, and investing them with a suspicion of usurpation.
Whence it is manifest, that both the rending the garment and the amazement were a pretense. But all things they got up, and plied, in order to bring Him to death.
This at any rate Pilate then asked. What then said Christ? "Thou sayest." He confessed that He was a king, but a heavenly king, which elsewhere also He spake more clearly, replying to Pilate, "My kingdom is not of this world;" that neither they nor this man should have an excuse for accusing Him of such things. And He gives a reason that cannot be gainsaid, saying, "If I were of this world, my servants would fight, that I should not be delivered." For this purpose I say, in order to refute this suspicion, He both paid tribute, and commanded others to pay it, and when they would make Him a king, He fled.
Wherefore then did he not bring forward these things, it may be said, at that time, when accused of usurpation? Because having the proofs from His acts, of His power, His meekness, His gentleness, beyond number, they were willfully blind, and dealt unfairly, and the tribunal was corrupt. For these reasons then He replies to nothing, but holds His peace, yet answering briefly (so as not to get the reputation of arrogance from continual silence) when the high priest adjured Him, when the governor asked, but in reply to their accusations He no longer saith anything; for He was not now likely to persuade them. Even as the prophet declaring this self-same thing from of old, said, "In His humiliation His judgment was taken away."
At these things the governor marvelled, and indeed it was worthy of admiration to see Him showing such great forbearance, and holding His peace, Him that had countless things to say. For neither did they accuse Him from knowing of any evil thing in Him, but from jealousy and envy only. At least when they had set false witness, wherefore, having nothing to say, did they still urge their point? and when they saw Judas was dead, and that Pilate had washed his hands of it, why were they not pricked with remorse. For indeed He did many things even at the very time, that they might recover themselves, but by none were they amended.
(Hom. Ixxxvi.) Pilate asked Christ that which His enemies were continually casting in His teeth, for because they knew that Pilate cared not for matters of their Law, they had recourse to a public charge.
He acknowledges Himself to be a King, but a heavenly one, as it is more expressly said in another Gospel, My kingdom is not of this world, (John 18:36.) so that neither the Jews nor Pilate were excusable for insisting on this accusation.
He said this out of a wish to release Him, if He should justify Himself in His answer. But the Jews, though they had so many practical proofs of His power, His meekness and humbleness, were yet enraged against Him, and urged on by a perverted judgment. Wherefore He answers nothing, or if He makes any answer He says little, that total silence might not be construed into obstinacy.
(in loc.) I have lately read in a Hebrew book given me by a Hebrew of the Nazarene sect, an apocryphal Hieremias, in which I find the very words here quoted. After all, I am rather inclined to think that the passage was taken by Matthew out of Zacharias, in the usual manner of the Apostles and Evangelists when they quote from the Old Testament, neglecting the words, and attending only to the sense.
But observe, that to Pilate who asked the question unwillingly He did answer somewhat; but to the Chief Priests and Priests He refused to answer, judging them unworthy of a word; And when he was accused by the Chief Priests and Elders, he answered nothing.
Thus though it is a Gentile who sentences Jesus, he lays the cause of His condemnation upon the Jews.
Or, Jesus would not make any answer, lest if He cleared Himself the governor should have let Him go, and the benefit of His cross should have been deferred.
(de Cons. Ev. iii. 8.) Luke explains what were the accusations alleged against Him, And they began to accuse him, saying, We found this fellow perverting the nation, and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar, saying that he himself is Christ a King. (Luke 23:2.) But it is of no consequence to the truth in what order they relate the history, or that one omits what another inserts.
They led Jesus to Pilate. And they handed him over to the Roman soldiers. Thus the things announced beforehand by the holy prophets were fulfilled to them. For it says, “Woe to the lawless man. Evil will be his lot according to his works.” Just “as you have done, so shall it be done to you. Your retribution will be paid back upon your own head.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Matthew 27:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Matthew 27:12 captures a profound moment in Jesus' trial before Pontius Pilate, where, despite facing fervent accusations from the chief priests and elders, He chose to remain completely silent. This deliberate non-response was not an admission of guilt or a sign of weakness, but a powerful demonstration of His divine sovereignty, a fulfillment of ancient prophecy, and a stark indictment of the baseless and malicious charges leveled against Him by the religious authorities.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is situated immediately after Jesus' appearance before the Sanhedrin, where He was condemned for blasphemy, and His subsequent delivery to Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor. The Jewish leaders, lacking the authority to execute a capital sentence under Roman occupation, brought Jesus to Pilate, shifting their accusations from religious blasphemy to political insurrection (claiming to be King of the Jews, forbidding tribute to Caesar). Matthew's narrative emphasizes the relentless pressure exerted by the chief priests and elders on Pilate, contrasting sharply with Jesus' composed and dignified silence. This scene sets the stage for Pilate's internal conflict and his eventual capitulation to the crowd's demands.
Historical & Cultural Context
The trial of Jesus before Pilate occurred during the Roman occupation of Judea. Roman law required a formal trial for capital offenses, and Pilate, as the governor, held the ultimate authority for such judgments. The Jewish Sanhedrin, while possessing significant religious and judicial power, had their authority curtailed by Rome, particularly concerning executions. The chief priests and elders represented the highest echelons of Jewish religious and political power, fiercely protective of their traditions and deeply threatened by Jesus' growing influence. Their accusations were strategically framed to appeal to Roman concerns about rebellion and maintaining order, rather than the true religious charges they had against Him. The cultural expectation was that an accused person would vehemently defend themselves, making Jesus' silence particularly astonishing to those present.
Key Themes
Matthew 27:12 contributes significantly to several overarching themes in the Gospel of Matthew and the broader biblical narrative. It highlights the theme of Divine Sovereignty as Jesus, though seemingly a helpless prisoner, maintains ultimate control through His deliberate silence, confounding His accusers and Pilate alike, as seen in Pilate's astonishment at Jesus' lack of response. This act also deeply underscores the theme of the Suffering Servant, echoing the prophetic words of Isaiah 53:7, which foretold a lamb led to slaughter who would not open his mouth. Furthermore, the verse starkly portrays the Injustice of the World's Judgment against God's truth, as the religious leaders, blinded by their own prejudices and fear, relentlessly pursue the condemnation of the innocent Son of God. This narrative also foreshadows the Ultimate Sacrifice Jesus is about to make, where His passive endurance is an active step towards atonement.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From katēgoros, meaning "a plaintiff." This word signifies a formal, legal charge, to bring an accusation against someone in a court of law. It highlights the judicial nature of the proceedings, emphasizing that the chief priests and elders were acting as formal prosecutors, leveling specific charges against Jesus before Pilate.
Comparative of "elderly," meaning "older; as noun, a senior." In this context, it refers to the senior members of the Jewish Sanhedrin, a council composed of chief priests, scribes, and elders. These were respected and influential figures within Jewish society, indicating the gravity and official nature of the opposition Jesus faced.
From apo and krino, meaning "to conclude for oneself, i.e. (by implication) to respond." By Hebraism, it can also mean "to begin to speak (where an address is expected)." The use of this verb, followed by "nothing," underscores the complete absence of any verbal defense or counter-argument from Jesus, despite the expectation that an accused person would speak.
Verse Breakdown
"And when he was accused of the chief priests and elders"
This clause establishes the setting and the primary action. Jesus, having been handed over to the Roman authorities by the Jewish religious elite, is now subjected to a formal legal process. The "chief priests and elders" are identified as the accusers, signifying the official and collective opposition from the highest echelons of Jewish religious and political power. Their accusations were not mere murmurs but formal charges presented to the Roman governor.
"he answered nothing"
This second clause describes Jesus' profound and impactful response—or lack thereof. Despite the gravity of the accusations and the expectation of a defense, Jesus chose complete silence. This was not an inability to speak, but a deliberate act of restraint and sovereignty, confounding His accusers and Pilate. His silence speaks volumes, demonstrating His control over the situation and His willingness to submit to the Father's will without protest.
Literary Devices
The verse employs several powerful literary devices. Contrast is paramount, juxtaposing the vehement, formal accusations of the religious leaders with Jesus' absolute silence. This stark opposition highlights the malicious intent of the accusers against the innocent and sovereign Christ. Symbolism is also present in Jesus' silence, which symbolizes His role as the Suffering Servant, willingly enduring injustice without complaint, fulfilling ancient prophecies. Furthermore, His silence carries an element of Irony, as the one who is the very embodiment of Truth offers no verbal defense against false charges, thereby exposing the inherent corruption and spiritual blindness of His accusers. The lack of a verbal response also serves as a form of Foreshadowing, pointing to His ultimate passive submission to the crucifixion, a sacrifice for the sins of humanity.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Matthew 27:12 profoundly illustrates the divine sovereignty of Jesus amidst His human vulnerability. His silence is not a sign of weakness, but a powerful demonstration of His control over the unfolding events, fulfilling prophecies and willingly submitting to the Father's redemptive plan. This act underscores the theme of the innocent suffering for the guilty, a cornerstone of Christian theology. It highlights the world's rejection of truth and the profound spiritual blindness of those who, despite being confronted with divine light, choose darkness. Jesus' silence before His accusers is a testament to His unwavering commitment to His mission, even unto death, and His trust in God's ultimate vindication.
Reflection and Application
Jesus' profound silence in Matthew 27:12 offers a powerful and counter-intuitive model for believers facing injustice, false accusations, or overwhelming opposition. It challenges the natural human inclination to defend oneself vigorously, instead inviting us to consider the strength found in patient endurance and trust in God's ultimate justice and timing. His silence was not born of fear or resignation, but of sovereign purpose and unwavering commitment to His Father's will. For us, this means discerning when to speak and when to remain silent, understanding that sometimes our quiet trust in God speaks more powerfully than any defense. It encourages us to surrender our need for immediate vindication, knowing that God is our ultimate defender and that His purposes will prevail. This passage also prompts us to examine our own hearts: are we quick to accuse, or do we patiently seek truth and justice, even when it is difficult?
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Jesus choose to remain silent when accused?
Jesus' silence was a deliberate and multifaceted act, not a sign of fear or inability to defend Himself. Theologically, it fulfilled ancient prophecies, particularly that of the Suffering Servant in Isaiah 53:7, who would be led "like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent." It also demonstrated His divine sovereignty and control over the situation, confounding His accusers and even surprising Pilate, as noted in John 19:10. His silence exposed the baselessness and malicious intent of the accusations, highlighting the profound injustice of the trial. Ultimately, it was an act of obedience to His Father's will, a necessary step in His redemptive mission to suffer and die for humanity's sins.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Matthew 27:12 powerfully illustrates Jesus' identity as the Christ, the Suffering Servant who willingly submits to injustice for the redemption of humanity. His silence before His accusers is a direct fulfillment of the prophetic portrait found in Isaiah 53, particularly the verse that declares, "He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth" (Isaiah 53:7). This deliberate non-response underscores His unique role as the sinless Lamb of God, who, rather than defending Himself, offers Himself as a blameless sacrifice for the sins of the world (John 1:29). His silence is an active demonstration of His obedience to the Father's redemptive plan, a path that leads directly to the cross where He would bear the full weight of human sin (2 Corinthians 5:21). In His quiet endurance, Jesus perfectly embodies the divine humility and self-sacrificial love that characterizes His entire mission, ultimately securing salvation and offering a model for all who follow Him to endure suffering with grace, knowing that their ultimate vindication rests in God (1 Peter 2:23-24).