Matthew 21:31
“Parable of the Two Sons”Matthew 21:28–32
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- τίςtisWhichG5101I-NSMInterrogative pronoun Nominative Singular Masculine
- ἐκekofG1537PREPPreposition
- τῶνtōntheG3588T-GPMDefinite article Genitive Plural Masculine
- δύοduotwoG1417A-NUIAdjective
- ἐποίησενepoiēsendidG4160V-AAI-3SVerb Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- τὸtotheG3588T-ASNDefinite article Accusative Singular Neuter
- θέλημαthelēmawillG2307N-ASNNoun Accusative Singular Neuter
- τοῦtouof theG3588T-GSMDefinite article Genitive Singular Masculine
- πατρός;patrosfather?G3962N-GSMNoun Genitive Singular Masculine
- λέγουσινlegousinThey sayG3004V-PAI-3PVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Plural
- αὐτῷ·autōto himG846P-DSMPersonal pronoun Dative Singular Masculine
- ὁhoTheG3588T-NSMDefinite article Nominative Singular Masculine
- πρῶτοςprōtosfirstG4413A-NSMAdjective Nominative Singular Masculine
- λέγειlegeiSaysG3004V-PAI-3SVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- αὐτοῖςautoisto themG846P-DPMPersonal pronoun Dative Plural Masculine
- ὁho[the]G3588T-NSMDefinite article Nominative Singular Masculine
- Ἰησοῦς·IēsousJesusG2424N-NSM-PNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Individual
- ἀμὴνamēnAmenG281INJ-HEBInterjection
- λέγωlegōI sayG3004V-PAI-1SVerb Present Active Indicative 1st Singular
- ὑμῖνhuminto youG4771P-2DPPersonal pronoun Dative 2nd Plural
- ὅτιhotithatG3754CONJConjunction
- οἱhoitheG3588T-NPMDefinite article Nominative Plural Masculine
- τελῶναιtelōnaitax collectorsG5057N-NPMNoun Nominative Plural Masculine
- καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
- αἱhaitheG3588T-NPFDefinite article Nominative Plural Feminine
- πόρναιpornaiprostitutesG4204N-NPFNoun Nominative Plural Feminine
- προάγουσινproagousingo beforeG4254V-PAI-3PVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Plural
- ὑμᾶςhumasyouG4771P-2APPersonal pronoun Accusative 2nd Plural
- εἰςeisintoG1519PREPPreposition
- τὴνtēntheG3588T-ASFDefinite article Accusative Singular Feminine
- βασιλείανbasileiankingdomG932N-ASFNoun Accusative Singular Feminine
- τοῦtou[the]G3588T-GSMDefinite article Genitive Singular Masculine
- θεοῦtheouof GodG2316N-GSM-TNoun Genitive Singular Masculine Title
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
- publicans (KJV) / tax collectors (BSB) τελώνης
Details
See on the biblical-era maps



Study this verse
Historical interpretation
Six Centuries of Reception
8 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Whence we may gather, that in this parable the Lord spoke to such as promise little or nothing, but in their works shine forth; and against those who promise great things but do none of these things that they have promised.
Notwithstanding, the Jews are not shut out that they should never enter into the kingdom of God; but, when the fulness of the Gentiles shall have entered in, then all Israel shall be saved. (Rom. 11:25.)
The first son represents the people who are from the Pharisees. Urgently admonished by God through the prophecy of John to conform themselves to his commandments, they remained insolent, disobedient and contemptuous to God’s warnings. They put their faith in the law and despised repentance from sin, glorying instead in the noble prerogative that they had from Abraham. Later they came to believe through the miracles worked by the apostles after the resurrection of the Lord, and, having returned by a faithful act of the will to evangelical works, they repented and confessed the guilt of their former insolence.The second son represents the group of publicans and sinners who later returned to the sinful state in which they lived at the time. They were instructed by John to expect salvation from Christ and to be baptized and to believe in him. When the Lord says in the parable that the second son did not go as he promised to do, he shows that these people believed John. But because they were not able to receive the teaching of the gospel through the apostles until after the Lord’s Passion (for it was then that the mysteries of human salvation were to be accomplished), they did not go. He didn’t say that they refused to go but simply that they did not go. Their failure to go does not make them guilty of disbelief, because to do so would have been very difficult. Therefore it is not that the second son did not want to do immediately what he was ordered to do but rather that he was unable to do it. His will is shown free from guilt by the obstacles of the circumstance.
After this, He saith, "What think ye? A man had two sons; and he saith to the first, go, work to-day in the vineyard. But he answered and said, I will not: but afterward he repented, and went. And he came to the second, and said likewise. And he answered and said, I go sir: and went not. Whether then of them twain did the will of his father? They say, the first."
Again He convicts them by a parable, intimating both their unreasonable obstinacy, and the submissiveness of those who were utterly condemned by them. For these two children declare what came to pass with respect to both the Gentiles and the Jews. For the former not having undertaken to obey, neither having become hearers of the law, showed forth their obedience in their works; and the latter having said, "All that the Lord shall speak, we will do, and will hearken," in their works were disobedient. And for this reason, let me add, that they might not think the law would benefit them, He shows that this self-same thing condemns them, like as Paul also saith, "Not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified." For this intent, that He might make them even self-condemned, He causes the judgment to be delivered by themselves, like as He does also in the ensuing parable of the vineyard.
And that this might be done, He makes trial of the accusation in the person of another. For since they were not willing to confess directly, He by a parable drives them on to what He desired.
But when, not understanding His sayings, they had delivered the judgment, He unfolds His concealed meaning after this, and saith, "Publicans and harlots go into the kingdom of Heaven before you. For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not; but the publicans believed him; and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterwards, that ye might believe him."
For if He had said simply, harlots go before you, the word would have seemed to them to be offensive; but now, being uttered after their own judgment it appears to be not too hard.
Therefore He adds also the accusation. What then is this? "John came," He saith, "unto you," not unto them, and not this only, but also "in the way of righteousness." "For neither with this can ye find fault, that he was some careless one, and of no profit; but both his life was irreprehensible, and his care for you great, and ye gave no heed to him."
And with this there is another charge also, that publicans gave heed; and with this, again another, that "not even after them did ye. For ye should have done so even before them, but not to do it even after them was to be deprived of all excuse;" and unspeakable was both the praise of the one, and the charge against the other. "To you he came, and ye accepted him not; he came not to them, and they receive him, and not even them did ye take for instructors."
See by how many things is shown the commendation of those, and the charge against these. To you he came, not to them. Ye believed not, this offended not them. They believed, this profited not you.
But the word, "go before you," is not as though these were following, but as having a hope, if they were willing. For nothing, so much as jealousy, rouses the grosser sort. Therefore He is ever saying, "The first shall be last, and the last first." Therefore He brought in both harlots and publicans, that they might provoke them to jealousy.
For these two indeed are chief sins, engendered of violent lust, the one of sexual desire, the other of the desire of money. And He indicates that this especially was hearing the law of God, to believe John. For it was not of grace only, that harlots entered in, but also of righteousness. For not, as continuing harlots, did they enter in, but having obeyed and believed, and having been purified and converted, so did they enter in.
Seest thou how He rendered His discourse less offensive, and more penetrating, by the parable, by His bringing in the harlots? For neither did He say at once, wherefore believed ye not John? but what was much more pricking, when He had put forward the publicans and the harlots, then He added this, by the order of their actions convicting their unpardonable conduct, and showing that for fear of men they do all things, and for vainglory. For they did not confess Christ for fear, lest they should be put out of the synagogue; and again, of John they dared not speak evil, and not even this from reverence, but for fear. All which things He convicted by His sayings, and with more severity afterwards did He go on to inflict the blow, saying, "But ye, when ye knew it, repented not afterwards, that ye might believe him."
For an evil thing it is not at the first to choose the good, but it is a heavier charge not even to be brought round. For this above all maketh many wicked, which I see to be the case with some now from extreme insensibility.
But let no one be like this; but though he be sunk down to the extremity of wickedness, let him not despair of the change for the better. For it is an easy thing to rise up out of the very abysses of wickedness.
(Verse 28 and following) What do you think? A certain man had two sons; and going to the first, he said: Son, go today to work in my vineyard. But he, answering, said: I do not want to. Afterwards, however, moved by repentance, he went. Going to the second, he said similarly. But he, answering, said: Yes, sir, and he did not go. Which of the two did the will of the father? And they said to him: The first. Jesus said to them (Luke XV). Hi sunt duo filii, qui et in Lucae parabola describuntur, frugi et luxuriosus, et de quibus Zacharias propheta loquitur: Assumpsi mihi duas virgas: unam vocavi decorem, et alteram vocavi funiculum, et pavi gregem (Zach. XI, 7) . Primo dicitur Gentilium populo per naturalis legis notitiam: Vade, et operare in vinea mea: hoc est, quod tibi non vis fieri, alteri ne feceris (Tob. IV) . Qui superbe respondit: Nolo. But afterwards, upon the arrival of the Savior, the works of repentance were done in the vineyard of God, and the insolence of speech was corrected by labor. However, the second son, who is the people of the Jews, replied to Moses: 'We will do everything that the Lord has spoken' (Exod. XXIV), but he did not go into the vineyard because, thinking himself the heir after the son of the household had been killed. But others do not consider it as a parable of the Gentiles and Jews, but rather of sinners and the righteous, as the Lord Himself later expounded on the matter.
Truly I tell you, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God ahead of you. For John came to you to show you the way of righteousness, and you did not believe him, but the tax collectors and the prostitutes did. And even after you saw this, you did not repent and believe him.
Thus much prefaced, the Lord brings forward a parable, to convict them of their irreligion, and show them that the kingdom of God should be transferred to the Gentiles.
He speaks to the Gentile people first, through their knowledge of the law of nature; Go and work in my vineyard; i. e. What you would not have done to you, that do not you to others. (Tobit 4:16.) He answers haughtily, I will not.
But when, at the coming of the Saviour, the Gentile people, having done penitence, laboured in God's vineyard, and atoned by their labour for the obstinacy of their refusal, this is what is said, But afterward he repented, and went. The second son is the Jewish people who made answer to Moses, All that the Lord hath said unto us we will do. (Exod. 24:3.)
It should be known that in the correct copies it is read not The last, but The first, that they might be condemned by their own sentence. But should we prefer to read, as some have it, The last, the explanation is obvious, to say that the Jews understood the truth, but dissembled, and would not say what they thought; just as though they knew that the baptism of John was from heaven, they would not say so.
Whence others think that the parable does not relate to Gentiles and Jews, but simply to the righteous and to sinners. These by their evil deeds had rejected God's service, but after received from John the baptism of repentance; while the Pharisees who made a show of righteousness, and boasted that they did the law of God, despising John's baptism, did not follow his precepts.
Those who are to be judged in this cause, He applies to as judges, that condemning themselves they might be shown to be unworthy to be acquitted by any other. It is high confidence of the justness of a cause, that will entrust it to the decision of an adversary. But He veils the allusion to them in a parable, that they might not perceive that they were passing sentence upon themselves; A certain man had two sons. Who is he but God, who created all men, who being by nature Lord of all, yet would rather be loved as a father, than feared as a Lord. The elder son was the Gentile people, the younger the Jews, since from the time of Noah there had been Gentiles. And he came to the first, and said, Son, go work to day in my vineyard. To day, i. e. during this age. He spoke with him, not face to face as man, but to his heart as God, instilling understanding through the senses. To work in the vineyard is to do righteousness; for to cultivate the whole thereof, I know not that any one man is sufficient.
For the Gentiles from the beginning leaving God and his righteousness, and going over to idols and sins, seem to make answer in their thoughts, We will not do the righteousness of God.
But afterwards turning their backs, they lied unto God, according to that in the Psalms, The sons of the strangers have lied unto me. (Ps. 18:44.) This is what is said, But he went not. The Lord accordingly asks which of them twain did the will of his father? They say unto him, The first. See how they have first sentence upon themselves, saying, that the elder son, that is, the Gentile people, did the will of his father. For it is better not to promise righteousness before God, and to do it, than to promise, and to fail.
The Lord abundantly confirms their decision, whence it follows, Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, that the publicans and harlots shall go before you in the kingdom of God; as much as to say, Not only the Gentiles are before you, but even the publicans and the harlots.
I suppose that the publicans here are to represent all sinful men, and the harlots all sinful women; because avarice is found the most prevailing vice among men, and fornication among women. For a woman's life is passed in idleness and seclusion, which are great temptations to that sin, while a man, constantly occupied in various active duties, falls readily into the snare of covetousness, and not so commonly into fornication, as the anxieties of manly cares preclude thoughts of pleasure, which engage rather the young and idle. Then follows the reason of what He had said, For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not.
Or, because his venerable conversation smote the hearts of sinners, as it follows, But the Publicans and harlots believed on him. Mark how the good life of the preacher gives its force to his preaching, so as to subdue unsubdued hearts. And ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him; as much as to say, They have done that which is more by believing on Him, ye have not even repented, which is less. But in this exposition which we have set forth according to the mind of many interpreters, there seems to me something inconsistent. For if by the two sons are to be understood the Jews and Gentiles, as soon as the Priests had answered that it was the first son that did his father's will, then Christ should have concluded His parable with these words, Verily I say unto you, that the Gentiles shall go into the kingdom of God before you. But He says, The Publicans and harlots, a class rather of Jews than of Gentiles. Unless this is to be taken as was said above; So much rather the Gentile people please God than you, that even the Publicans and harlots are more acceptable to Him than you.
This He brings in because the Priests had asked not in order to learn, but to tempt Him. But of the common folk many had believed; and for that reason He brings forward the parable of the two sons, showing them therein that the common sort, who from the first professed secular lives, were better than the Priests who from the first professed the service of God, inasmuch as the people at length turned repentant to God, but the Priests impenitent, never left off to sin against God. And the elder son represents the people; because the people is not for the sake of the Priests, but the Priests are for the sake of the people.
There are two reasons why the knowledge of truth should be kept back from those who ask; either when he who asks is unfit to receive, or from his hatred or contempt of the truth is unworthy to have that which he asks opened to him.
Yet the kingdom of God may be understood of the Gentiles, or of the present Church, in which the Gentiles go before the Jews, because they were more ready to believe.
John came preaching the way of righteousness, because he pointed to Christ, who is the fulfilling of the Law.
Continue studying Matthew 21:31 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The leaders themselves say the first son did his father’s will, and Jesus tells them that publicans and harlots are going into the kingdom of God ahead of them.
“Whether of them twain did the will of his father?”
The question is about doing. Thélēma is the father’s wish, already stated to both sons.
“They say unto him, The first.”
The right answer, and it condemns the men who give it.
“Jesus saith unto them, Verily I say unto you,”
Amḗn is a strong affirmation that what follows is true and to be taken seriously.
“That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you.”
The tax collector (telṓnēs) and the prostitute (pórnē) go ahead (proágō) of the temple’s leaders into God’s kingdom (basileía), because they repented at John’s preaching.
Passage studyMatthew 21:28–32
The Two Sons and the Father’s Will
Summary
In the temple, during the last week before the cross, Jesus tells the chief priests and elders a short story about a father and two sons. The first son refuses to work in the vineyard, then repents and goes. The second answers politely, “I go, sir”, and stays away. The leaders themselves say that the first son did his father’s will, and Jesus applies their answer to them: publicans and harlots who believed John the Baptist are going into the kingdom of God ahead of the men who run the temple. The Father measures obedience by what a son does, and he receives those who turn to him late.
Why Jesus told this parable
Jesus has ridden into Jerusalem and cleansed the temple, and the chief priests and elders have come to him in its courts demanding to know by what authority he does these things. He answers with a question of his own about the authority of John the Baptist, and they decline to answer it (Matthew 21:23–27). The parable of the two sons is his reply to that silence. It is also the first of three parables spoken against the same men, followed by the wicked tenants of the vineyard (Matthew 21:33–46) and the wedding feast (Matthew 22:1–14). Together they expose leaders who have turned away God’s messengers and borne none of the fruit he looks for, and in the middle of them Jesus says that the kingdom of God will be taken from them and given to a people who bring forth its fruits (Matthew 21:43). These are the leaders who will soon bring about his crucifixion, which gives his words their urgency.
He opens with a question: “But what think ye?” The verb dokéō is the ordinary word for thinking or supposing. Jesus asks for their judgment on a simple family story before they can see where it leads, and the answer they give becomes the standard by which he measures them.
The father, his sons and the vineyard
The father in the story stands for God, and the two sons stand for two groups of people who answer him in opposite ways. In Israel a father held great authority in his house, and a son’s obedience was expected of him as part of the fifth commandment, “Honour thy father and thy mother” (Exodus 20:12). Being sent to work the family vineyard was an ordinary part of a son’s life.
The vineyard, ampelṓn, was a picture every hearer knew. The prophets used it for Israel, the people God planted and tended and from whom he looked for the fruit of righteousness. Isaiah sings of a vineyard that failed to give that fruit and came under judgment (Isaiah 5:1–7), and a psalm prays for the vine God brought out of Egypt (Psalm 80:8–19). In this parable the vineyard is the place of God’s work, his kingdom and his purposes, and the call to work there is a call to live righteously and bear fruit for him.
The command is “Son, go work to day in my vineyard.” The verb ergázomai means to work or to labour, and it comes from ergon, a work or deed. The father is asking for something done, and “to day” sets the time for it. He speaks to each son in person, and to the second he “said likewise”, so both hear the same command and have the same opportunity. The word for “second”, deúteros, simply marks the other son, whose answer will be set beside his brother’s.
The first son: he refused, then repented and went
“He answered and said” joins two common verbs, apokrínomai and épō, and together they mean only that he replied. His reply is blunt: “I will not”, with the plain Greek negative ou. It is an open refusal of his father’s authority, spoken to his face.
Then the story turns on one word. “Afterward he repented” uses metaméllomai, built from metá (“after”) and mélō (“to care”), so that it means to care afterwards, to regret, to change one’s mind. The proof that his regret was real is in the last two words of the verse, “and went”. The verb apérchomai means to go away or depart: he set off for the vineyard and did what his father had asked. John the Baptist had called for exactly this when he told the crowds to bring forth fruits worthy of repentance (Luke 3:8).
The first son stands for the publicans and harlots. Their lives had been a spoken “I will not” to God, and when they heard his call they turned and obeyed. His story holds out real hope, because a refusal already given can still be followed by a change of heart, and the Father receives the son who comes late.
How is this repentance different from metanoia?
The word in this parable, metaméllomai, speaks of regret and a change of mind about something one has done. Metanoia is the fuller word for repentance in the New Testament, a turning of heart, mind and direction away from sin and toward God, and it is the repentance preached by John (Matthew 3:1–12) and by Jesus (Matthew 4:17). Regret alone can stop short. Judas felt it after betraying Jesus, and Matthew uses this same verb of him (Matthew 27:3), yet it led him to no saving faith. In the first son the regret did its proper work, because it carried him into the vineyard.
The second son: “I go, sir”
The second son’s answer is as courteous as his brother’s was rude. He calls his father kýrios, “sir”, a respectful form of address, and promises to go. Then come three words in the KJV, “and went not”, where the same verb apérchomai that described his brother’s going is joined to the negative ou. All his respect was in his mouth.
He stands for the chief priests and elders, and for anyone whose religion is a matter of words. These men professed obedience to God, kept the law and the traditions with care, and held the highest places in Israel, and yet they turned away John’s message and then Jesus himself. Jesus had warned of this throughout his ministry. He taught that the kingdom belongs to the one who does the Father’s will, whatever a man may say with “Lord, Lord” on his lips (Matthew 7:21), and he asked why people called him Lord and left his sayings undone (Luke 6:46). He warned against righteousness practised to be seen by others (Matthew 6:1–18) and compared the scribes and Pharisees to tombs that look clean on the outside (Matthew 23:27). A tree, he said, is known by its fruit (Matthew 7:15–20).
James teaches the same thing when he writes that faith which has no works is dead (James 2:14–26). Works earn nothing toward salvation, which is God’s gift by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8–9). They are what a living faith produces, as surely as the first son’s change of mind produced his walk to the vineyard.
The leaders give their own verdict
Jesus asks, “Whether of them twain did the will of his father?” The word for will, thélēma, means what someone has determined or desires, here the father’s stated wish that his sons work in the vineyard. The leaders answer correctly, “The first”, and with those two words they pass judgment on themselves, since they have just agreed that a respectful promise left undone is disobedience.
Jesus then speaks with “Verily”, the word amḗn, a strong affirmation that marks what follows as weighty and sure. “The publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you.” A publican, telṓnēs, was a collector of public revenue. These were Jews who gathered taxes for the Roman occupiers and often took extra for themselves, so their own people despised them as traitors and sinners. A harlot, pórnē, was a prostitute, counted morally unclean and shut out of respectable society. The chief priests and elders stood at the opposite end of Israel’s life, honoured for their learning and their careful observance. To be told that such people “go before” them, proágō, into the kingdom, basileía (a word formed from basileús, “king”), was scandalous. In God’s kingdom the order that people assign to one another is often reversed, as Jesus says elsewhere: many that are first shall be last, and the last first (Matthew 19:30).
Were the publicans and harlots better people than the priests?
Jesus is speaking of how each group answered God’s call. The publicans and harlots heard John’s preaching, owned their sin and believed, while the leaders, who looked righteous, turned the same message away. So the outcasts entered by repentance and faith, and their former lives earned them nothing. Jesus tells the same truth in the parable of the Pharisee and the publican, where the man who prays “God be merciful to me a sinner” goes home justified (Luke 18:9–14). People who know they are sinners are ready to receive mercy, and pride in one’s own goodness can keep a person from the kingdom as surely as open sin.
John came in the way of righteousness
Verse 32 gives the reason for the verdict, and it returns to the question the leaders had refused to answer about John. “John came unto you in the way of righteousness.” Righteousness, dikaiosýnē, is rightness of character and action by God’s standard. John’s own life matched the message he preached in the wilderness, a call to repent and be baptized because the kingdom of heaven was at hand, and he lived the righteousness he asked of others.
“Ye believed him not: but the publicans and the harlots believed him.” To believe, pisteúō, is to credit what someone says and to put one’s trust in it. Luke records the same division: the people and the publicans received John’s baptism, and the Pharisees and lawyers refused it (Luke 7:29–30). The outcasts had no reputation to protect and knew their need, and their belief showed in changed lives.
The last charge is the heaviest. “And ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him.” The leaders watched sinners being changed in front of them, which gave them a second opportunity, and they let it pass. The verb is metaméllomai again, the first son’s word. He said “I will not” and afterwards changed his mind, and these men, who had said yes to God all their lives, would not change theirs even with the evidence before their eyes. John’s work was to prepare people to believe, and finally to believe in the Christ he announced, so in refusing John they were already refusing Jesus. The door stood open to them as well, for Isaiah calls the wicked man to forsake his way and return to the LORD, who “will abundantly pardon” (Isaiah 55:7).
Christ, the Son who said yes and went
Neither son in the parable answers his father rightly from beginning to end. One speaks rudely and the other fails to act. Jesus is the Son who did both well. He said that he always does the things that please the Father (John 8:29). In Gethsemane he prayed that the Father’s will be done and his own set aside (Luke 22:42), and he was obedient all the way to death on a cross (Philippians 2:8).
His obedience is also what brings the first son home. Jesus came to call sinners to repentance (Matthew 9:13, Mark 2:17), and God showed his love in that Christ died for us while we were still sinners (Romans 5:8). He is the way, the truth and the life, and we come to the Father through him (John 14:6). He is the true vine as well, and we bear fruit in God’s vineyard as branches that abide in him (John 15:1–5). God promised to put his Spirit within his people and cause them to walk in his statutes (Ezekiel 36:27), and so the obedience Jesus asks of those who love him (John 14:15) is something he himself supplies.
What the two sons leave with us
This parable shows us a Father who goes to each of his children himself and who cares about what we do with his word once we have heard it. He takes the son’s late walk to the vineyard as the doing of his will, and the earlier refusal is left behind. That is good news for anyone whose past holds a long “I will not”. The publicans and harlots found that the kingdom was open to them the day they believed, and it is open on the same terms now.
The parable also speaks to those of us who have said yes for years, in prayers, in worship and in what we confess. The second son’s words were perfectly correct, and the father was looking at the vineyard. The work he sends us to takes many forms, among them serving the lowly, telling the gospel, growing in holiness, handling what we have been given faithfully and dealing justly with the people around us. The one day the father names for it is “to day”.
And it keeps us from sorting people too quickly. Jesus saw God at work among the people whom respectable Israel had given up on, and the leaders’ failure to rejoice at it was part of their sin. When someone with a ruined past turns to God, we are watching the first son set out for the vineyard.
Matthew 21:28
“But what think ye?”
Jesus asks the chief priests and elders for their opinion, using dokéō, the everyday verb for thinking. He draws them in as judges of a case that will turn out to be their own.
“A certain man had two sons;”
The father pictures God, and the sons picture two ways of answering him. The story is kept bare so that attention stays on what each son says and does.
“and he came to the first, and said, Son,”
The father comes to him and addresses him as his child. The command is personal.
“go work to day in my vineyard.”
Ergázomai is to work or labour, and “to day” asks for it now. The vineyard (ampelṓn) is the prophets’ picture of God’s people (Isaiah 5:1–7), and here it is the place of God’s work.
Matthew 21:29
“He answered and said, I will not:”
Apokrínomai and épō together simply report his reply, and ou is the plain “not”. He refuses openly.
“but afterward he repented,”
The turning point. Metaméllomai means to care afterwards, to regret and change one’s mind.
“and went.”
Apérchomai, to go off or depart. What he did in the end is the measure of his answer to his father.
Matthew 21:30
“And he came to the second, and said likewise.”
The same father, the same command, the same chance. Deúteros is simply “second”.
“And he answered and said, I go, sir:”
The Greek reply is very short, “I, sir”, with kýrios as the respectful address. He sounds like the obedient one.
“and went not.”
The verb of his brother’s obedience, apérchomai, is here negated with ou. The promise was the whole of his obedience.
Matthew 21:31 This verse
“Whether of them twain did the will of his father?”
The question is about doing. Thélēma is the father’s wish, already stated to both sons.
“They say unto him, The first.”
The right answer, and it condemns the men who give it.
“Jesus saith unto them, Verily I say unto you,”
Amḗn is a strong affirmation that what follows is true and to be taken seriously.
“That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you.”
The tax collector (telṓnēs) and the prostitute (pórnē) go ahead (proágō) of the temple’s leaders into God’s kingdom (basileía), because they repented at John’s preaching.
Matthew 21:32
“For John came unto you in the way of righteousness,”
John’s life and preaching were in keeping with God’s standard, dikaiosýnē, and he came to these leaders as well as to the crowds.
“and ye believed him not:”
The charge made directly. Jesus puts it down to no lack of evidence on John’s side.
“but the publicans and the harlots believed him:”
Pisteúō: they took John at his word and acted on it.
“and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward,”
They saw sinners changed and still held their position. The verb is the first son’s metaméllomai.
“that ye might believe him.”
Repentance would have led them to believe John, and John pointed to Christ.
Last revised