Mark 2:23
“Jesus Is Lord of the Sabbath”Mark 2:23–28
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- ΚαὶKaiAndG2532CONJConjunction
- ἐγένετοegenetoit came to passG1096V-2ADI-3SVerb 2nd Aorist Middle Deponent Indicative 3rd Singular
- αὐτὸνautonHeG846P-ASMPersonal pronoun Accusative Singular Masculine
- ἐνenonG1722PREPPreposition
- τοῖςtoistheG3588T-DPNDefinite article Dative Plural Neuter
- σάββασινsabbasinSabbathsG4521N-DPNNoun Dative Plural Neuter
- παραπορεύεσθαιparaporeuesthaipassing throughG3899V-PNNVerb Present Middle Or Passive Deponent Infinitive
- διὰdiathroughG1223PREPPreposition
- τῶνtōntheG3588T-GPNDefinite article Genitive Plural Neuter
- σπορίμωνsporimōngrainfieldsG4702A-GPNAdjective Genitive Plural Neuter
- καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
- οἱhoitheG3588T-NPMDefinite article Nominative Plural Masculine
- μαθηταὶmathētaidisciplesG3101N-NPMNoun Nominative Plural Masculine
- αὐτοῦautouof HimG846P-GSMPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Masculine
- ἤρξαντοērxantobeganG757V-ADI-3PVerb Aorist Middle Deponent Indicative 3rd Plural
- ὁδὸνhodon[their] wayG3598N-ASFNoun Accusative Singular Feminine
- ποιεῖνpoieinto makeG4160V-PANVerb Present Active Infinitive
- τίλλοντεςtillontespluckingG5089V-PAP-NPMVerb Present Active Participle Nominative Plural Masculine
- τοὺςtoustheG3588T-APMDefinite article Accusative Plural Masculine
- στάχυαςstachuasheads of grainG4719N-APMNoun Accusative Plural Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Mark 2:18–28. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
Christ had been put to justify himself in conversing with publicans and sinners: here he is put to justify his disciples; and in what they do according to his will he will justify them, and bear them out.
I.He justifies them in their not fasting, which was turned to their reproach by the Pharisees.
Why do the Pharisees and the disciples of John fast? They used to fast, the Pharisees fasted twice in the week (Luke 18:12), and probably the disciples of John did so too; and, it should seem, this very day, when Christ and his disciples were feasting in Levi's house, was their fast-day, for the word is nēsteuousi - they do fast, or are fasting, which aggravated the offence. Thus apt are strict professors to make their own practice a standard, and to censure and condemn all that do not fully come up to it. They invidiously suggest that if Christ went among sinners to do them good, as he had pleaded, yet the disciples went to indulge their appetites, for they never knew what it was to fast, or to deny themselves. Note, Ill-will always suspects the worst.
Two things Christ pleads in excuse of his disciples not fasting.
1.That these were easy days with them, and fasting was not so seasonable now as it would be hereafter, Mark 2:19, Mark 2:20. There is a time for all things. Those that enter into the married state, must expect care and trouble in the flesh, and yet, during the nuptial solemnity, they are merry, and think it becomes them to be so; it was very absurd for Samson's bride to weep before him, during the days that the feast lasted, Judges 14:17. Christ and his disciples were but newly married, the bridegroom was yet with them, the nuptials were yet in the celebrating (Matthew's particularly); when the bridegroom should be removed from them to the far country, about his business, then would be a proper time to sit as a widow, in solitude and fasting.
2.That these were early days with them, and they were not so able for the severe exercises of religion as hereafter they would be. The Pharisees had long accustomed themselves to such austerities; and John Baptist himself came neither eating nor drinking. His disciples from the first inured themselves to hardships, and thus found it easier to bear strict and frequent fasting, but it was not so with Christ's disciples; their Master came eating and drinking, and had not bred them up to the difficult services of religion as yet, for it was all in good time. To put them upon such frequent fasting at first, would be a discouragement to them, and perhaps drive them off from following Christ; it would be of as ill consequence as putting new wine into old casks, or sewing new cloth to that which is worn thin and threadbare, Mark 2:21, Mark 2:22. Note, God graciously considers the frame of young Christians, that are weak and tender, and so must we; nor must we expect more than the work of the day in its day, and that day according to the strength, because it is not in our hands to give strength according to the day. Many contract an antipathy to some kind of food, otherwise good, by being surfeited with it when they are young; so, many entertain prejudices against the exercises of devotion by being burthened with them, and made to serve with an offering, at their setting out. Weak Christians must take heed of over-tasking themselves, and of making the yoke of Christ otherwise than as it is, easy, and sweet, and pleasant.
II.He justifies them in plucking the ears of corn on the sabbath day, which, I will warrant you, a disciples of the Pharisees would not dare to have done; for it was contrary to an express tradition of their elders. In this instance, as in that before, they reflect upon the discipline of Christ's school, as if it were not so strict as that of theirs: so common it is for those who deny the power of godliness, to be jealous for the form, and censorious of those who affect not their form.
Observe, 1. What a poor breakfast Christ's disciples had on a sabbath-day morning, when they were going to church (Mark 2:23); they plucked the ears of corn, and that was the best they had. They were so intent upon spiritual dainties, that they forgot even their necessary food; and the word of Christ was to them instead of that; and their zeal for it even ate them up. The Jews made it a piece of religion, to eat dainty food on sabbath days, but the disciples were content with any thing.
2.How even this was grudged them by the Pharisees, upon supposition that it was not lawful to pluck the ears of corn on the sabbath day, that that was as much a servile work as reaping (Mark 2:24); Why do they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful? Note, If Christ's disciples do that which is unlawful, Christ will be reflected upon, and upbraided with it, as he was here, and dishonour will redound to his name. It is observable, that when the Pharisees thought Christ did amiss, they told the disciples (Mark 2:16); and now when they thought the disciples did amiss, they spoke to Christ, as make-bates, that did what they could to sow discord between Christ and his disciples, and make a breach in the family.
3.How Christ defended them in what they did.
(1.)By example. They had a good precedent for it in David's eating the show-bread, when he was hungry, and there was no other bread to be had (Mark 2:25, Mark 2:26); Have ye never read? Note, Many of our mistakes would be rectified, and our unjust censures of others corrected, if we would but recollect what we have read in the scripture; appeals to that are most convincing. "You have read that David, the man after God's own heart, when he was hungry, made no difficulty of eating the show-bread, which by the law none might eat of but the priests and their families." Note, Ritual observances must give way to moral obligations; and that may be done in a case of necessity, which otherwise may not be done. This, it is said, David did in the days of Abiathar the High-Priest; or just before the days of Abiathar, who immediately succeeded Abimelech his father in the pontificate, and, it is probable, was at that time his father's deputy, or assistant, in the office; and he it was that escaped the massacre, and brought the ephod to David.
(2.)By argument. To reconcile them to the disciples' plucking the ears of corn, let them consider,
[1.]Whom the sabbath was made for (Mark 2:27); it was made for man, and not man for the sabbath. This we had not in Matthew. The sabbath is a sacred and divine institution; but we must receive and embrace it as a privilege and a benefit, not as a task and a drudgery. First, God never designed it to be an imposition upon us, and therefore we must not make it so to ourselves. Man was not made for the sabbath, for he was made a day before the sabbath was instituted. Man was made for God, and for his honour and service, and he just rather die than deny him; but he was not made for the sabbath, so as to be tied up by the law of it, from that which is necessary to the support of his life. Secondly, God did design it to be an advantage to us, and so we must make it, and improve it. He made if for man. 1. He had some regard to our bodies in the institution, that they might rest, and not be tired out with the constant business of this world (Deuteronomy 5:14); that thy man-servant and thy maid-servant may rest. Now he that intended the sabbath-rest for the repose of our bodies, certainly never intended it should restrain us, in a case of necessity, from fetching in the necessary supports of the body; it must be construed so as not to contradict itself - for edification, and not for destruction. 2. He had much more regard to our souls. The sabbath was made a day of rest, only in order to its being a day of holy work, a day of communion with God, a day of praise and thanksgiving; and the rest from worldly business is therefore necessary, that we may closely apply ourselves to this work, and spend the whole time in it, in public and in private; but then time is allowed us for that which is necessary to the fitting of our bodies for the service of our souls in God's service, and the enabling of them to keep pace with them in that work. See here, (1.) What a good Master we serve, all whose institutions are for our own benefit, and if we be so wise as to observe them, we are wise for ourselves; it is not he, but we, that are gainers by our service. (2.) What we should aim at in our sabbath work, even the good of our own souls. If the sabbath was made for man, we should then ask ourselves at night, "What am I the better for this sabbath day?" (3.) What care we ought to take not to make those exercises of religion burthens to ourselves or others, which God ordained to be blessings; neither adding to the command by unreasonable strictness, nor indulging those corruptions which are adverse to the command, for thereby we make those devout exercises a penance to ourselves, which otherwise would be a pleasure.
[2.]Whom the sabbath was made by (Mark 2:28); "The Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath; and therefore he will not see the kind intentions of the institution of it frustrated by your impositions." Note, The sabbath days are days of the Son of man; he is the Lord of the day, and to his honour it must be observed; by him God made the worlds, and so it was by him that the sabbath was first instituted; by him God gave the law at mount Sinai, and so the fourth commandment was his law; and that little alteration that was shortly to be made, by the shifting of it one day forward to the first day of the week, was to be in remembrance of his resurrection, and therefore the Christian sabbath was to be called the Lord's day (Revelation 1:10), the Lord Christ's day; and the Son of man, Christ, as Mediator, is always to be looked upon as Lord of the sabbath. This argument he largely insists upon in his own justification, when he was charged with having broken the sabbath, John 5:16.
Historical interpretation
Seven Centuries of Reception
6 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
(non occ. sed v. Chrys. Hom. 39, in Matt) But being hungry, they ate simple food, not for pleasure, but on account of the necessity of nature. The Pharisees however, serving the figure and the shadow, accused the disciples of doing wrong. Wherefore there follows, But the Pharisees said unto him, Behold, why do they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful.
(de Op. Monach. 23) For it was a precept in Israel, delivered by a written law, that no one should detain a thief found in his fields, unless he tried to take something away with him. For the man, who had touched nothing else but what he had eaten, they were commanded to allow to go away free and unpunished. Wherefore the Jews accused our Lord's disciples, who were plucking the ears of corn, of breaking the sabbath, rather than of theft.
(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) The disciples of Christ, freed from the figure, and united to the truth, do not keep the figurative feast of the sabbath, wherefore it is said, And it came to pass, that he went through the corn fields on the sabbath day; and his disciples began, as they went, to pluck the ears of corn.
(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) But our Lord brings forward David, to whom it once happened to eat though it was forbidden by the law, when he touched the Priest's food, that by his example, he might do away with their accusation of the disciples. For there follows, Have ye never read, &c.
(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) He calls himself properly, Lord of the sabbath, and Son of man, since being the Son of God, he deigned to be called Son of man, for the sake of men. Now the law has no authority over the Lawgiver and Lord, for more is allowed the king, than is appointed by the law. The law is given to the weak indeed, but not to the perfect and to those who work above what the law enjoins.
And again it happened on the Sabbath, etc. We read in the following passages that there were many who came and went, and they did not even have time to eat, and thus they were almost hungry like men. But what they rub the ears of grain with their hands, and console their hunger, is an indication of a more austere life, seeking not prepared feasts, but simple foods. However, the Pharisees said to him: Behold, why are your disciples doing what is not lawful on the Sabbath? Note that the first apostles of the Savior destroy the letter of the Sabbath against the Hebionites, who, while accepting the other apostles, reject Paul as a transgressor of the law. Mystically, however, the disciples pass through the fields, namely those about which the Lord said: Lift up your eyes and see the regions, for they are already white for harvest. And he who reaps receives wages (John IV), as holy teachers observe with the care of pious concern those whom they seek to instruct in the faith of truth, and with diligent consideration ponder how each one should be drawn to salvation and in what order. And therefore it is understood that nothing is better than hungering for the salvation of men, which the first of the reapers, once hungering among the prayers, soon when offered the dainties he desired, heard: Arise, Peter, kill and eat (Acts X). And there is wonderful harmony of the sacrament, for there too animals ordered to be slain and eaten are sent from heaven, and here the disciples, consecrating the ears of corn with the Lord looking on, are said, according to the accounts of the other evangelists, to have rubbed them with their hands and eaten. For this is what the Apostle says: Mortify your members that are upon the earth, and put off the old man with his deeds (Coloss. III). For no one can otherwise pass into the body of Christ, nor otherwise nourish the teacher with the fruits of their progress, than if, having renounced the old desires, one becomes a new man with the new commandment of love. Therefore, to pluck the ears of grain is to draw men away from earthly intentions, where they had fixed, as it were, the root of their minds; but to rub them with hands is, through examples of virtues, to strip away, as it were, the husks and coverings of the chaff, even from the very desires of the flesh, the purity of the mind. To eat the grains is to be incorporated into the members of the Church, each one cleansed from the filth of vices, through the preaching mouths. And it is well remembered that the disciples did this while going before the Lord, for the teacher’s word must precede, and thus the grace of the supreme visitation illuminates the following heart of the listener. Well on the Sabbath, for the holy teachers both labor in preaching for the hope of future rest, and equally admonish their listeners not to insist on superfluous works for the love of the world, but rather to labor hard for eternal rest in good works. Again, they walk through the fields with the Lord, who, striving to obey divine commands, delight in diligently meditating on the sacred words. They hunger in the fields, desiring to find the bread of life in the same sacred words they read through, that is, they care to reach those words by which they may kindle in themselves a greater love for their Creator. And this on the Sabbath, when they rejoice to be free from the turbulent thoughts with a calm mind, and to see how sweet the Lord is, and how blessed the man who hopes in Him (Psalm XXXIII). And assuming the habit of piety and humility, they strive to reach the rest of their souls. They pluck the ears that perhaps occur, and turn and purify them with their hands until they reach the food, when they take up the testimonies of the Scriptures which they reach by reading, and discuss them with diligent investigation until they find the marrow of love that seemed to be hidden in them. For just as the grains of wheat which refresh are veiled by the roughness of the chaff which bristles, so often under what seemed the usefulness of the letter are hidden the gifts of divine love, which feed the hungry and thirsty minds of the faithful with the dainties of inner sweetness. But this refreshment of minds indeed displeases the foolish defenders of the Sabbath, but is approved by the Lord of the Sabbath, for those who follow only the surface of the letter neither know true refreshment of minds nor reach the inner rest of souls. Hence their recklessness is rightly confounded by the mouth of Truth, while it is added:
(ubi sup.) Neither was it fitting to sew on a, new piece; that is, a portion of doctrine which teaches a general fast from all the joy of temporal delights; for if this be done, the teaching is rent, and agrees not with the old part. But by a new garment is intended good works, which are done externally, and by the new wine, is expressed the fervour of faith, hope, and charity, by which we are reformed in our minds.
(in Marc. 1, 13) We read also in the following part, that they who came and went away were many, and that they had not time enough to take their food, wherefore, according to man's nature, they were hungry.
(ubi sup.) There is, however, no discrepancy, for both were there, when David came to ask for bread, and received it: that is to say, Abimelech, the High Priest, and Abiathar his son; but Abimelech having been slain by Saul, Abiathar fled to David, and became the companion of all his exile afterwards. When he came to the throne, he himself also received the rank of High Priest, and the son became of much greater excellence than the father, and therefore was worthy to be mentioned as the High Priest, even during his fathers life-time. It goes on: And he said to them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath. For greater is the care to be taken of the health and life of a man, than the keeping of the sabbath. Therefore the sabbath was ordered to be observed in such a way, that, if there were a necessity, he should not be guilty, who broke the sabbath-day; therefore it was not forbidden to circumcise on the sabbath, because that was a necessary work. And the Maccabees, when necessity pressed on them, fought on the sabbath-day. Wherefore, His disciples being hungry, what was not allowed in the law became lawful through their necessity of hunger; as now, if a sick man break a fast, he is not held guilty in any way. It goes on: Therefore the Son of man is Lord, &c. As if he said, David the king is to be excused for feeding on the food of the Priests, how much more the Son of man, the true King and Priest, and Lord of the sabbath, is free from fault, for pulling ears of corn on the sabbath-day.
(ubi sup.) But in a mystical sense the disciples pass through the corn fields, when the holy doctors look with the care of a pious solicitude upon those whom they have initiated in the faith, and who, it is implied, are hungering for the best of all things, the salvation of men. But to pluck the ears of corn means to snatch men away from the eager desire of earthly things. And to rub with the hands is by examples of virtue to put from the purity of their minds the concupiscence of the flesh, as men do husks. To eat the grains is when a man, cleansed from the filth of vice by the mouths of preachers, is incorporated amongst the members of the Church. Again, fitly are the disciples related to have done this, walking before the face of the Lord, for it is necessary that the discourse of the doctor should come first, although the grace of visitation from on high, following it, must enlighten the heart of the hearer. And well, on the sabbath-day, for the doctors themselves in preaching labour for the hope of future rest, and teach their hearers to toil over their tasks for the sake of eternal repose.
(ubi sup) Again, they walk through the corn fields with the Lord, who rejoice in meditating upon His sacred words. They hunger, when they desire to find in them the bread of life; and they hunger on sabbath days, as soon as their minds are in a soothing rest, and they rejoice in freedom from troubled thoughts; they pluck the ears of corn, and by rubbing, cleanse them, till they come to what is fit to eat, when by meditation they take to themselves the witness of the Scriptures, to which they arrive by reading, and discuss them continually, until they find in them the marrow of love; this refreshment of the mind is truly unpleasing to fools, but is approved by the Lord.
For David, when flying from the face of Saul, went to the Chief Priest, and ate the show-bread, and took away the sword of Goliath, which things had been offered to the Lord. (1 Sam. 21.) But a question has been raised how the Evangelist called Abiathar at this time High Priest, when the Book of Kings calls him Abimelech.
Or else, because when they hare rest from their passions, then are they made doctors to lead others to virtue, plucking away from them earthly things.
Continue studying Mark 2:23 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
On a Sabbath Jesus walks through the grain fields, and his disciples pick heads of grain to eat as they go.
“And it came to pass,”
A plain narrative opening (gínomai) that moves the story to a new scene.
“that he went through the corn fields on the sabbath day;”
Jesus goes ahead and his disciples with him, likely on a path through the fields. “On the sabbath day” tells every Jewish hearer that what follows will be measured against the Sabbath law.
“and his disciples began, as they went,”
The plucking happens on the move, a handful taken in passing to meet an immediate hunger, with no harvest in view.
“to pluck the ears of corn.”
Heads of wheat or barley pulled off by hand. The law of Moses allowed it in a neighbour’s field (Deuteronomy 23:25), and the Pharisees’ Sabbath rules counted it as reaping.
Passage studyMark 2:23–28
Jesus Is Lord of the Sabbath
Summary
On a Sabbath Jesus walks through the grain fields, and his disciples pick heads of grain as they go. The Pharisees call this unlawful, because their rules counted it as harvesting. Jesus answers from Scripture: when David and his men were hungry, David ate the holy shewbread that only the priests could eat. Then he gives the principle, “The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath”, and the conclusion, “Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath.” In these six verses we learn that God gave the Sabbath as a gift for our good, that mercy lies at the heart of his law, and that Jesus has authority over the very day God made holy.
What the disciples did in the grain fields
This scene is one of five conflicts between Jesus and the religious leaders that Mark sets side by side, four in Mark 2 and the last in Mark 3:1–6. Before it, Jesus has forgiven and healed a paralysed man (Mark 2:1–12), called Levi the tax collector (Mark 2:13–17) and answered a question about fasting (Mark 2:18–22). Each time his authority is questioned, and each time he answers. The next story, the healing of the man with the withered hand, also happens on a Sabbath, so the whole run of Mark 2:1–3:6 closes with the Sabbath at the centre of the dispute, and the opposition it stirs up leads on toward the cross.
“It came to pass” translates gínomai, a verb meaning to become or come about, used here simply to open a new scene. Jesus and his disciples are walking through cultivated fields, most likely on a path that ran through them. In the KJV “corn” is the old English word for grain of any kind, here wheat or barley, the staple crops of Israel. The “ears of corn” are the heads of grain, stáchys, and to pluck is tíllō, to pull off by hand. It is a small and simple act. The disciples pick heads as they walk, likely rubbing them between their hands to free the kernels from the chaff, the quick meal of hungry travellers.
The law of Moses allowed exactly this. A man passing through his neighbour’s standing grain could pluck the ears with his hand and eat (Deuteronomy 23:25). The question was the day. The Sabbath, sábbaton, a word that comes from the Hebrew for rest, is the seventh day, which God set apart in the fourth commandment as a day of rest from labour and a holy day (Exodus 20:8–11). Over the centuries the teachers of Israel, and the Pharisees most of all, built a large body of rules around it, meant as a fence around the law so that no one would break the commandment by accident. These traditions, later written down in the Mishnah, listed thirty-nine kinds of forbidden work, among them reaping, threshing and winnowing. By that reckoning plucking the grain was reaping, and rubbing it in the hands was threshing and winnowing.
Why the Pharisees called it unlawful
The Pharisees, Pharisaîos, were a Jewish party known for keeping the law of Moses strictly and for their detailed oral traditions about it. The name comes from a Hebrew root meaning “to separate”. They saw themselves as guardians of the law, and they speak to Jesus because they hold him responsible for what his disciples are doing.
“Behold” is íde, an interjection, “see! lo!”, that calls for attention and gives weight to what follows. What follows is a charge: “why do they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful?” The words for “not lawful” are ou éxesti, the plain word for “not” joined to the verb for what is permitted. The question asks for no information. It accuses the disciples, and through them their teacher, and it was meant to put Jesus on the spot.
Their verdict rested on their own reading of the law, since the written law allowed the plucking itself. It was the day that made them object. God gave the Sabbath as a holy rest in memory of his creation and of Israel’s deliverance from Egypt (Exodus 20:8–11, Deuteronomy 5:12–15). The Pharisees’ rules were meant to protect that holiness, but in practice they loaded the day with prohibitions that hid its first purpose of rest, refreshment and mercy. Jesus met the same objection whenever he did good on the Sabbath, as in Luke 13:10–17, where he heals on the Sabbath and is challenged for it.
What David did, and why Jesus told it
Jesus answers from Scripture: “Have ye never read what David did...?” The verb anaginṓskō means to read, and it comes from “to know again”, said of written letters. The force lies in the question. These men knew the Scriptures well and had read this story many times, and Jesus asks them whether they have taken in what it shows.
He chooses David, Dabíd, the king Israel honoured above all others, “a man after mine own heart” in God’s own words (Acts 13:22). In Hebrew his name carries the sense “loving”. The Pharisees could hardly condemn David, and if they accepted what he did, they would have to think again about the disciples.
The story is told in 1 Samuel 21:1–6. David was fleeing from King Saul, and he and his men were hungry. Jesus says that he “had need, and was an hungred”. The verb peináō means to be hungry, with a real and pressing hunger, and it can describe famine. Jesus also names “they that were with him”, so David’s companions stand where the disciples stand.
David “went into the house of God”, and the verb eisérchomai is the ordinary word for going in or entering. In David’s day the house of God was the tabernacle, here at Nob. There he did eat, phágō, the plain verb “to eat”, the shewbread. In Hebrew this is lechem panim, “bread of the presence”: twelve loaves set out before the LORD each week in the holy place, a sign of God’s constant provision for the twelve tribes of Israel. The law gave the bread to Aaron and his sons, to be eaten by them in a holy place (Leviticus 24:5–9). That is why Jesus adds “which is not lawful to eat but for the priests”. The words “but for” are ei mḗ, “if not” or “except”, which marks the one exception the law made, and David stood outside it. He “gave also to them which were with him”, so the holy bread fed a hungry company.
Jesus freely grants that David acted outside the letter of the law, and the priests who guarded the bread did not condemn him. The lesson is that God’s law is given for the good of the people who live under it. When a man and his companions were hungry, keeping them alive came first, and mercy outweighed the ceremony. God says it through the prophet: “For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice” (Hosea 6:6). In Matthew’s account of this same day Jesus quotes the verse, “I will have mercy, and not sacrifice” (Matthew 12:7), a word he had already given the Pharisees (Matthew 9:13).
The argument also runs from the lesser to the greater. Plucking a few heads of grain was a small thing beside eating the holy bread. If David, acting out of need, could do that blamelessly, how much more may the Son of man allow his hungry disciples to eat. Matthew records Jesus saying it outright: “in this place is one greater than the temple” (Matthew 12:6). Matthew tells the whole scene in Matthew 12:1–8, and Luke in Luke 6:1–5.
Why does Jesus name Abiathar?
Jesus places the event “in the days of Abiathar the high priest”, while 1 Samuel 21:1 names Ahimelech as the priest who gave David the bread. Abiathar was Ahimelech’s son. He escaped and came to David (1 Samuel 22:20–23), stayed loyal to him, and became the prominent high priest of David’s reign. Two explanations are commonly given, and both fit the words. “In the days of Abiathar” can mark the period by the well-known high priest whose name belonged to that time, in the way we date events by a famous reign. Or Abiathar may have been there with his father that day, and Jesus names the better known of the two. On either reading the argument stands, because it rests on what David did, and the Pharisees raised no objection to the detail.
The sabbath was made for man
Then Jesus gives the principle behind the whole dispute: “The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath.” God made the Sabbath at the beginning, when he rested on the seventh day and blessed it (Genesis 2:2–3). He gave it to Israel in the fourth commandment and made it a sign between himself and his people (Exodus 31:13–17).
“Was made” is gínomai, the verb behind “it came to pass” in verse 23, meaning to come into being. The purpose lies in the little word “for”, diá, which with this construction means “for the sake of”. The Sabbath came into being for man’s sake. The word for man is ánthrōpos, the general word for a human being, so Jesus speaks of the day as God’s gift to humanity, with its rest meant for people everywhere.
So the order is God’s own. The day serves people, and people receive it as a gift. Rest from work, refreshment of body and spirit, worship, and remembering what God has done are the things it was given to bring. When the disciples were hungry, their need mattered to the God who gave the day, and a rule that turned his gift into a burden had lost sight of the Giver. Every command of God is given in the same spirit, as a path to life and blessing.
Does this end the Sabbath commandment?
Jesus sets the Sabbath in its true place here, as God’s gift for our good, and he frees it from the weight of rules that had hidden its purpose. The commandment’s own aim, a day of rest and worship given in kindness, is exactly what he affirms.
Believers differ on how the commandment applies to us now. Many keep Sunday, the Lord’s Day, in memory of Christ’s resurrection and the new creation, and on that reading the day of rest and worship continues as God’s gift, kept on the first day of the week. Others put the weight on Paul’s word that the Sabbath days “are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ” (Colossians 2:16–17), and on that reading our true rest is found in Christ himself, whatever day we gather. On every reading this verse holds: God made us with a need for regular rest from work and for time with him, and he gives both with freedom and grace.
The Son of man is Lord of the sabbath
“Therefore”, hṓste, draws the conclusion. Since the Sabbath was made for man, the Son of man is Lord of it. “Man” in both verses is the same word, ánthrōpos, and the step from one to the other carries the claim. The day God made for humanity belongs to the one who stands at the head of humanity with authority from God.
“The Son of man”, huiós (son) with ánthrōpos, is the title Jesus uses for himself most often in the Gospels. It speaks of his true humanity, and it also points to the figure in Daniel’s vision who comes with the clouds of heaven and receives dominion, glory and an everlasting kingdom (Daniel 7:13–14). The title joins the man walking through the grain fields with the King who will judge and reign.
“Lord” is kýrios, master, one supreme in authority, the word that so often stands for the God of Israel himself. To be Lord of the Sabbath is to own it, with the right to say what it is for and how it is kept. The teachers of the law could only interpret the Sabbath, and Jesus claims to stand over it as its master. Because the Sabbath was God’s own institution, the claim places Jesus where God stands. The word “also” adds the Sabbath to the authority he has already shown in this chapter, where he forgave sins, and his lordship reaches to all things. Matthew and Luke both close the scene with this saying (Matthew 12:8, Luke 6:5).
This is why the saying stirred such anger. To the Pharisees the Sabbath was God’s direct command, defined by centuries of tradition, and Jesus claimed the right to say what it meant. In the next scene he asks them whether it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath days (Mark 3:4), and when he has healed the man, they go out and plot against him (Mark 3:6).
Rest and bread from the Lord of the Sabbath
The Sabbath was a shadow of the rest God intends for his people, and the Lord of the Sabbath is the one who gives that rest. “There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God” (Hebrews 4:9–10), and whoever enters it ceases from his own works. Jesus himself calls, “Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matthew 11:28–30). Through his death and resurrection he gives rest from the striving of works and the burden of sin, and he sets his people free from the yoke of bondage (Galatians 5:1). “The law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ” (John 1:17).
The bread in David’s story points to him as well. David fed his hungry men with holy bread, and Jesus is the bread of God that comes down from heaven and gives life to the world (John 6:33). “I am the bread of life,” he says (John 6:35).
So this short scene in a grain field shows us who God is. He notices when his people are hungry. He gave the Sabbath as a kindness, and every command he gives is for our good. And the one who has authority over his holy day is Jesus, who uses that authority to feed, to defend and to give rest. The rest he offers is his own, and it is given to all who come to him.
Mark 2:23 This verse
“And it came to pass,”
A plain narrative opening (gínomai) that moves the story to a new scene.
“that he went through the corn fields on the sabbath day;”
Jesus goes ahead and his disciples with him, likely on a path through the fields. “On the sabbath day” tells every Jewish hearer that what follows will be measured against the Sabbath law.
“and his disciples began, as they went,”
The plucking happens on the move, a handful taken in passing to meet an immediate hunger, with no harvest in view.
“to pluck the ears of corn.”
Heads of wheat or barley pulled off by hand. The law of Moses allowed it in a neighbour’s field (Deuteronomy 23:25), and the Pharisees’ Sabbath rules counted it as reaping.
Mark 2:24
“And the Pharisees said unto him,”
They speak to Jesus, holding him answerable for his disciples, so the charge is also a challenge to his teaching and authority.
“Behold,”
A call for attention (íde) that puts weight on the accusation that follows.
“why do they on the sabbath day”
The “why” demands a justification. The act itself was lawful on other days, and the day is what made it wrong in their eyes.
“that which is not lawful?”
Their verdict, reached by their traditions about Sabbath work, since the written law permitted plucking grain to eat.
Mark 2:25
“And he said unto them,”
Jesus turns to his accusers and answers them from their own Scriptures.
“Have ye never read what David did,”
A question to experts in the Scriptures about a story they knew well, asking whether they have grasped what it teaches.
“when he had need, and was an hungred,”
Need and hunger together describe a real necessity, the same condition as the disciples’.
“he, and they that were with him?”
David’s men shared his hunger and his bread, as the disciples share their Master’s defence.
Mark 2:26
“How he went into the house of God”
The tabernacle at Nob, the dwelling place of God’s presence in David’s day (1 Samuel 21:1–6).
“in the days of Abiathar the high priest,”
Abiathar, son of Ahimelech, became the well-known high priest of David’s reign. The study above gives the explanations of the name.
“and did eat the shewbread,”
The holy bread set before the LORD, eaten by a hungry man in flight from Saul.
“which is not lawful to eat but for the priests,”
Jesus states the prohibition plainly (Leviticus 24:9). He grants that David acted outside the letter of the law, and that is the strength of his example.
“and gave also to them which were with him?”
The holy bread fed a whole company, which matches the disciples eating together.
Mark 2:27
“And he said unto them,”
Mark marks a fresh saying. After the example from David comes the principle behind it.
“The sabbath was made for man,”
God brought the day into being for the sake of people, as a gift of rest and renewal.
“and not man for the sabbath:”
The order of the two halves is reversed, so the saying is easy to remember and sets the priorities right. People were made by God, and the day was given to serve them.
Mark 2:28
“Therefore”
The conclusion (hṓste) drawn from the saying before it.
“the Son of man”
Jesus’ own title for himself, joining his true humanity with the heavenly King of Daniel 7:13–14.
“is Lord”
A present claim of mastery and ownership, spoken by Jesus as he stands among them.
“also of the sabbath.”
The Sabbath is added to all that is already under his authority, including the forgiveness of sins earlier in the chapter.
Last revised