TRV
- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Mark 14:12–31. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
In these verses we have,
I.Christ's eating the passover with his disciples, the night before he died, with the joys and comforts of which ordinance he prepared himself for his approaching sorrows, the full prospect of which did not indispose him for that solemnity. Note, No apprehension of trouble, come or coming, should put us by, or put us out of frame for, our attendance on holy ordinances, as we have opportunity for it.
1.Christ ate the passover at the usual time when the other Jews did, as Dr. Whitby had fully made out, and not, as Dr. Hammond would have it, the night before. It was on the first day of that feast, which (taking in all the eight days of the feast) was called, The feast of unleavened bread, even that day when they killed the passover, Mar 14:12.
2.He directed his disciples how to find the place where he intended to eat the passover; and hereby gave such another proof of his infallible knowledge of things distant and future (which to us seem altogether contingent), as he had given when he sent them for the ass on which he rode in triumph (Mar 11:6); "Go into the city (for the passover must be eaten in Jerusalem), and there shall meet you a man bearing a pitcher of water (a servant sent for water to clean the rooms in his master's house); follow him, go in where he goes, enquire for his master, the good man of the house (Mar 14:14), and desire him to show you a room." No doubt, the inhabitants of Jerusalem had rooms fitted up to be let out, for this occasion, to those that came out of the country to keep the passover, and one of those Christ made use of; not any friend's house, nor any house he had formerly frequented, for then he would have said, "Go to such a friend," or, "You know where we used to be, go thither and prepare." Probably he went where he was not known, that he might be undisturbed with his disciples. Perhaps he notified it by a sign, to conceal it from Judas, that he might not know till he came to the place; and by such a sign to intimate that he will dwell in the clean heart, that is, washed as with pure water. Where he designs to come, a pitcher of water must go before him; see Isa 1:16-18.
3.He ate the passover in an upper room furnished, estrōmenon - laid with carpets (so Dr. Hammond); it would seem to have been a very handsome dining-room. Christ was far from affecting any thing that looked stately in eating his common meals; on the contrary, he chose that which was homely, sat down on the grass: but, when he was to keep a sacred feast, in honour of that he would be at the expense of as good a room as he could get. God looks not at outward pomp, but he looks at the tokens and expressions of inward reverence for a divine institution, which, it is to be feared, those want, who, to save charges, deny themselves decencies in the worship of God.
4.He ate it with the twelve, who were his family, to teach those who have the charge of families, not only families of children, but families of servants, or families of scholars, or pupils, to keep up religion among them, and worship God with them. If Christ came with the twelve, then Judas was with them, though he was at this time contriving to betray his Master; and it is plain by what follows (Mar 14:20), that he was there: he did not absent himself, lest he could have been suspected; had his seat been empty at this feast, they would have said, as Saul of David, He is not clean, surely he is not clean, Sa1 20:26. Hypocrites, though they know it is at their peril, yet crowd into special ordinances, to keep up their repute, and palliate their secret wickedness. Christ did not exclude him from the feast, though he knew his wickedness, for it was not as yet become public and scandalous. Christ, designing to put the keys of the kingdom of heaven into the hands of men, who can judge only according to outward appearance, would hereby both direct and encourage them in their admissions to his table, to be satisfied with a justifiable profession, because they cannot discern the root of bitterness till it springs up.
II.Christ's discourse with his disciples, as they were eating the passover.
It is probable that they had discourse, according to the custom of the feast, of the deliverance of Israel out of Egypt, and the preservation of the first-born, and were as pleasant as they used to be together on this occasion, till Christ told them that which would mix trembling with their joys.
1.They were pleasing themselves with the society of their Master; but he tells them that they must now presently lose him; The Son of man is betrayed; and they knew, for he had often told them, what followed - If he be betrayed, the next news you will hear of him, is, that he is crucified and slain; God hath determined it concerning him, and he agrees to it; The Son of man goes, as it is written of him, Mar 14:21. It was written in the counsels of God, and written in the prophecies of the Old Testament, not one jot or tittle of either of which can fall to the ground.
2.They were pleasing themselves with the society one of another, but Christ casts a damp upon the joy of that, by telling them, One of you that eateth with me shall betray me, Mar 14:18. Christ said this, if it might be, to startle the conscience of Judas, and to awaken him to repent of his wickedness, and to draw back (for it was not too late) from the brink of the pit. But for aught that appears, he who was most concerned in the warning, was least concerned at it. All the rest were affected with it.
(1.)They began to be sorrowful. As the remembrance of our former falls into sin, so the fear of the like again, doth often much embitter the comfort of our spiritual feasts, and damp our joy. Here were the bitter herbs, with which this passover-feast was taken.
(2.)They began to be suspicious of themselves; they said one by one, Is it I? And another said, Is it I? They are to be commended for their charity, that they were more jealous of themselves than of one another. It is the law of charity, to hope the best (Co1 13:5-7), because we assuredly know, therefore we may justly suspect, more evil by ourselves than by our brethren. They are also to be commended for their acquiescence in what Christ said; they trusted more to his words than to their own hearts; and therefore do not say, "I am sure it is not I," but, "Lord, is it I? see if there be such a way of wickedness in us, such a root of bitterness, and discover it to us, that we may pluck up that root, and stop up that way."
Now, in answer to their enquiry, Christ saith that, [1.] Which would make them easy; "It is not you, or you; it is this that now dips with me in the dish; the adversary and enemy is this wicked Judas." [2.] Which, one would think, should make Judas very uneasy. If he go on in his undertaking, it is upon the sword's point, for woe to that many by whom the Son of man is betrayed; he is undone, for every undone; his sin will soon find him out; and it were better for him that he had never been born, and had never had a being than such a miserable one as he must have. It is very probable that Judas encouraged himself in it with this thought, that his Master had often said he must be betrayed; "And if it must be done, surely God will not find fault with him that doth it, for who hath resisted his will?" As that objector argues, Rom 9:19. But Christ tells him that this will be no shelter or excuse to him; The Son of man indeed goes; as it is written of him, as a lamb to the slaughter; but woe to that man by whom he is betrayed. God's decree to permit the sins of men, and bring glory to himself out of them, do neither necessitate their sins, nor determine to them, nor will they be any excuse of the sin, or mitigation of the punishment. Christ was delivered indeed by the determinate counsel and fore-knowledge of God; but, notwithstanding that, it is with wicked hands that he is crucified and slain, Act 2:23.
III.The institution of the Lord's supper.
1.It was instituted in the close of a supper, when they were sufficiently fed with the paschal lamb, to show that in the Lord's supper there is no bodily repast intended; to preface it with such a thing, is to revive Moses again. But it is food for the soul only, and therefore a very little of that which is for the body, as much as will serve for a sign, is enough. It was at the close of the passover-supper, which by this was evangelized, and then superseded and set aside. Much of the doctrine and duty of the eucharist is illustrated to us by the law of the passover (Ex. 12); for the Old Testament institutions, though they do not bind us, yet instruct us, by the help of a gospel-key to them. And these two ordinances lying here so near together, it may be good to compare them, and observe how much shorter and plainer the institution of the Lord's supper is, than that of the passover was. Christ's yoke is easy in comparison with that of the ceremonial law, and his ordinances are more spiritual.
2.It was instituted by the example of Christ himself; not with the ceremony and solemnity of a law, as the ordinance of baptism was, after Christ's resurrection (Mat 28:19), with, Be it enacted by the authority aforesaid, by a power given to Christ in heaven and on earth (Mat 28:18); but by the practice of our Master himself, because intended for those who are already his disciples, and taken into covenant with him: but it has the obligation of the law, and was intended to remain in full force, power, and virtue, till his second coming.
3.It was instituted with blessing and giving of thanks; the gifts of common providence are to be so received (Ti1 4:4, Ti1 4:5), much more than the gifts of special grace. He blessed (Mar 14:22), and gave thanks, Mar 14:23. At his other meals, he was wont to bless, and give thanks (Mar 6:41; Mar 8:7) so remarkably, that he was known by it, Luk 24:30, Luk 24:31. And he did the same at this meal.
4.It was instituted to be a memorial of his death; and therefore he broke the bread, to show how it pleased the Lord to bruise him; and he called the wine, which is the blood of the grape, the blood of the New Testament. The death Christ died was a bloody death, and frequent mention is made of the blood, the precious blood, as the pride of our redemption; for the blood is the life, and made atonement for the soul, Lev 17:11-14. The pouring out of the blood was the most sensible indication of the pouring out of his soul, Isa 53:12. Blood has a voice (Gen 4:10); and therefore blood is so often mentioned, because it was to speak, Heb 12:24. It is called the blood of the New Testament; for the covenant of grace became a testament, and of force by the death of Christ, the testator, Heb 9:16. It is said to be shed for many, to justify many (Isa 53:11), to bring many sons to glory, Heb 2:10. It was sufficient for many, being of infinite value; it has been of use to many; we read of a great multitude which no man could number, that had all washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb (Rev 7:9-14); and still it is a fountain opened. How comfortable is this to poor repenting sinners, that the blood of Christ is shed for many! And if for many, why not for me? If for sinners, sinners of the Gentiles, the chief of sinners, then why not for me?
5.It was instituted to be a ratification of the covenant made with us in him, and a sign of the conveyance of those benefits to us, which were purchased for us by his death; and therefore he broke the bread to them (Mar 14:22), and said, Take, eat of it: he gave the cup to them, and ordered them to drink of it, Mar 14:23. Apply the doctrine of Christ crucified to yourselves, and let it be meat and drink to your souls, strengthening, nourishing, and refreshing, to you, and the support and comfort of your spiritual life.
6.It was instituted with an eye to the happiness of heaven, and to be an earnest and fore-taste of that, and thereby to put our mouths out of taste for all the pleasures and delights of sense (Mar 14:25); I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine, as it is a bodily refreshment. I have done with it. No one, having tasted spiritual delights, straightway desires sensitive ones, for he saith, The spiritual is better (Luk 5:39); but every one that hath tasted spiritual delights, straightway desires eternal ones, for he saith, Those are better still; and therefore let me drink no more of the fruit of the vine, it is dead and flat to those that have been made to drink of the river of God's pleasures; but, Lord, hasten the day, when I shall drink it new and fresh in the kingdom of God, where it shall be for ever new, and in perfection.
7.It was closed with a hymn, Mar 14:26. Though Christ was in the midst of his enemies, yet he did not, for fear of them, omit this sweet duty of singing psalms. Paul and Silas sang, when the prisoners heard them. This was an evangelical song, and gospel times are often spoken of in the Old Testament, as times of rejoicing, and praise is expressed by singing. This was Christ's swan-like song, which he sung just before he entered upon his agony; probably, that which is usually sung, Psa 113:1-9 to 118.
IV.Christ's discourse with his disciples, as they were returning to Bethany by moonlight.
When the had sung the hymn, presently they went out. It was now near bedtime, but our Lord Jesus had his heart so much upon his suffering, that he would not come into the tabernacle of his house, norgo up into his bed, nor give sleep to his eyes, when that work was to be done, Psa 132:3, Psa 132:4. The Israelites were forbidden to go out of their houses the night that they ate the passover, for fear of the sword of the destroying angel, Exo 12:22, Exo 12:23. But because Christ, the great shepherd, was to be smitten, he went out purposely to expose himself to the sword, as a champion; they evaded the destroyer, but Christ conquered him, and brought destructions to a perpetual end.
1.Christ here foretels that in his sufferings he should be deserted by all his disciples; "You will all be offended because of me, this night. I know you will (Mar 14:27), and what I tell you now, is no other than what the scripture has told you before; I will smite the shepherd, and then the sheep will be scattered." Christ knew this before, and yet welcomed them at his table; he sees the falls and miscarriages of his disciples, and yet doth not refuse them. Nor should we be discouraged from coming to the Lord's supper, by the fear of relapsing into sin afterward; but, the greater of our danger is, the more need we have to fortify ourselves by the diligent conscientious use of holy ordinances. Christ tells them that they would be offended in him, would begin to question whether he were the Messiah or no, when they saw him overpowered by his enemies. Hitherto, they had continued with him in his temptations; though they had sometimes offended him, yet they had not been offended in him, nor turned the back upon him; but now the storm would be so great, that they would all slip their anchors, and be in danger of shipwreck. Some trials are more particular (as Rev 2:10, The devil shall cast some of you into prison); but others are more general, an hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, Rev 3:10. The smiting of the shepherd is often the scattering of the sheep: magistrates, ministers, masters of families, if these are, as they should be, shepherds to those under their charge, when any thing comes amiss to them, the whole flock suffers for it, and is endangered by it.
But Christ encourages them with a promise that they shall rally again, shall return both to their duty and to their comfort (Mar 14:28); "After I am risen, I will gather you in from all the places wither you are scattered, Eze 34:12. I will go before you into Galilee, will see our friends, and enjoy one another there."
2.He foretels that he should be denied particularly by Peter. When they went out to go to the mount of Olives, we may suppose that they dropped Judas (he stole away from them), whereupon the rest began to think highly of themselves, that they stuck to their Master, when Judas quitted him. But Christ tells them, that though they should be kept by his grace from Judas's apostasy, yet they would have no reason to boast of their constancy. Note, Though God keeps us from being as bad as the worst, yet we may well be ashamed to think that we are not better than we are.
(1.)Peter is confident that he should not do so ill as the rest of his disciples (Mar 14:29); Though all should be offended, all his brethren here present, yet will not I. He supposes himself not only stronger than others, but so much stronger, as to be able to receive the shock of a temptation, and bear up against it, all alone; to stand, though nobody stood by him. It is bred in the bone with us, to think well of ourselves, and trust to our own hearts.
(2.)Christ tells him that he will do worse than any of them. They will all desert him, but he will deny him; not once, but thrice; and that presently; "This day, even this night before the cock crow twice, thou wilt deny that ever thou hadst any knowledge of me, or acquaintance with me, as one ashamed and afraid to own me."
(3.)He stands to his promise; "If I should die with thee, I will not deny thee; I will adhere to thee, though it cost me my life:" and, no doubt, he thought as he said. Judas said nothing like this, when Christ told him he would betray him. He sinned by contrivance, Peter by surprise; he devised the wickedness (Mic 2:1), Peter was overtaken in this fault, Gal 6:1. It was ill done of Peter, to contradict his Master. If he had said, with fear and trembling, "Lord, give me grace to keep me from denying thee, lead me not into this temptation, deliver me from this evil," it might have been prevented: but they were all thus confident; they who said, Lord, is it I? now said, It shall never be me. Being acquitted from their fear of betraying Christ, they were now secure. But he that thinks he stands, must learn to take heed lest he fall; and he that girdeth on the harness, not boast as though he had put it off.
Historical interpretation
Nine Centuries of Reception
6 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
The evening of the day points out the evening of the world; for the last, who are the first to receive the penny of eternal life, come about the eleventh hour. All the disciples then are touched by the Lord; so that there is amongst them the harmony of the harp, all the well attuned strings answer with accordant tone; for it goes on: And they began to be sorrowful, and to say unto him one by one, Is it I? One of them however, unstrung, and steeped in the love of money, said, Is it I, Lord? as Matthew testifies.
Again, He says, One out of the twelve, as it were separate from them, for the wolf carries away from the flock the sheep which he has taken, and the sheep which quits the fold lies open to the bite of the wolf. But Judas does not withdraw his foot from his traitorous design though once and again pointed at, wherefore his punishment is foretold, that the death denounced upon him might correct him, whom shame could not overcome; wherefore it goes on: The Son of man indeed goeth, as it is written of him.
But because many do good, in the way that Judas did, without its profiting them, there follows: Woe to that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! good were it for that man if he had never been born.
That is, hidden in his mother's inmost womb, for it is better for a man not to exist than to exist for torments.
Seeing that the disciples were disturbed, Jesus called the betrayer to accountability by poignantly recalling the prophetic words of the psalmist: “Even my bosom friend in whom I trusted, who ate of my bread, has lifted up his heel against me.” This corresponds to the Evangelist’s report of him saying: “It is one of the twelve, one who is dipping bread into the dish with me.” Judas the betrayer was thrusting his hand into the very same dish along with Jesus as they were eating the passover meal. This highlighted Judas’ shamelessness. The very one who was being generously received to a common table betrayed Jesus who had embraced him with such great affection. He betrayed the bestower of these good gifts for the promise of thirty pieces of silver. Isn’t this especially characteristic of extremely malevolent persons—to plot against those with whom they have shared bread and salt, who would in no way injure them?
(ubi sup.) Where it is evident that He did not proclaim him openly to all, lest He should make him the more shameless; at the same time He did not altogether keep it silent, lest thinking that he was not discovered, he should boldly hasten to betray Him.
He said to them, "One of the twelve, who is dipping his hand with me in the dish." Oh marvelous power of the Lord! First he had said, "One of you will betray me," the betrayer persists in evil, he is more clearly accused, and yet his name is not specifically designated. Judas, while the others were saddened and withdrawing their hands and forbidding food to their mouths, with the rashness and impudence by which he was about to betray the master, even puts his hand with the master into the dish, so that his audacity could falsely claim a good conscience.
(ubi sup.) The Lord who had foretold His Passion, prophesied also of the traitor, in order to give him room for repentance, that understanding that his thoughts were known, he might repent. Wherefore it is said, And in the evening he cometh with the twelve. And as they sat and did eat, Jesus said, Verily I say unto you, One of you which eateth with me shall betray me.
(ubi sup.) That is, Judas, who when the others were sad and held back their hands, puts forth his hand with his Master into the dish. And because He had before said, One of you shall betray me, and yet the traitor perseveres in his evil, He accuses him more openly, without however pointing out his name.
(ubi sup.) Woe too to that man, to-day and for ever, who comes to the Lord's table with an evil intent. For he, after the example of Judas, betrays the Lord, not indeed to Jewish sinners, but to his own sinning members. It goes on: Good were it for that man if he had never been born.
But how could they eat reclining, when the law ordered that standing and upright they should eat the Passover? It is probable that they had first fulfilled the legal Passover, and had reclined, when He began to give them His own Passover.
But the other disciples began to be saddened on account of the word of the Lord; for although they were free from this passion, yet they trust Him who knows all hearts, rather than themselves. It goes on: And he answered and said unto them, It is one of the twelve, that dippeth with me in the dish.
The word here used, goeth, shows that the death of Christ was not forced but voluntary.
For as respects the end for which he was designed, it would have been better for him to have been born, if he had not been the betrayer, for God created him for good works; but after he had fallen into such dreadful wickedness, it would have been better for him never to have been born.
Continue studying Mark 14:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
In Mark 14:20, Jesus responds to His disciples' anguished query about who among them would betray Him, revealing that the betrayer is "one of the twelve, that dippeth with me in the dish." This statement, delivered during the solemn Last Supper, subtly yet pointedly identifies Judas Iscariot not as an external enemy, but as an intimate companion, highlighting the profound irony and tragedy of betrayal from within the closest circle of fellowship.
Context
Literary Context
Mark 14:20 is situated within the intensely dramatic narrative of Jesus' final hours before His crucifixion, specifically during the Passover meal with His disciples. The preceding verses (Mark 14:17-19) describe Jesus' shocking announcement that "one of you which eateth with me shall betray me," leading to the disciples' distressed and individual questioning, "Is it I?" Jesus' response in verse 20 serves as a more specific, though still veiled, identification, narrowing the field from any disciple to one who shares a particular intimate act with Him. This moment sets the stage for the subsequent events of Judas's departure, Jesus' institution of the Lord's Supper, the Olivet Discourse, and ultimately, the betrayal in Gethsemane. The narrative meticulously builds the tension around the impending betrayal, emphasizing its internal origin.
Historical & Cultural Context
The setting is a Passover Seder, a highly significant annual Jewish feast commemorating the Exodus from Egypt. Meals in ancient Near Eastern culture, particularly communal ones like the Passover, were deeply symbolic of covenant, fellowship, and peace. Sharing food from a common dish, as implied by "dippeth with me in the dish," was an act of profound intimacy and trust, signifying a shared life and loyalty. This practice would have been commonplace, and for Jesus to identify the betrayer through such an intimate act underscores the heinous nature of Judas's treachery. The meal would have taken place in an "upper room" in Jerusalem, a city brimming with religious and political tension during the Passover festival, making the impending events even more volatile.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Mark's Gospel and biblical theology. Foremost is the theme of Betrayal from Within, emphasizing that the greatest wounds often come from those closest to us, echoing themes found in Psalm 41:9. It also highlights Divine Foreknowledge and Sovereignty, as Jesus demonstrates His awareness of the precise circumstances of His betrayal, indicating that these events, though tragic, were not outside of God's predetermined plan for salvation, as seen in Luke 22:22. Furthermore, the verse underscores the Paradox of Intimacy and Treachery, where the very act symbolizing deep fellowship becomes the marker for the ultimate act of disloyalty, a stark contrast to the true communion Jesus desires with His followers, as depicted in John 15:13-15.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This primary numeral signifies singularity, indicating that the betrayer is a specific individual among the group. In this context, it emphasizes the shocking reality that out of the chosen twelve, only one would commit such an act of treachery. It points to a distinct person, not a group, making the identification personal and precise.
Meaning "to whelm on" or "wet by contact with a fluid," this verb describes the act of dipping something (like bread or herbs) into a communal dish. It implies shared participation in a meal, a common practice symbolizing close fellowship and hospitality in ancient Jewish culture. The present participle form ("that dippeth") indicates an ongoing or characteristic action, further emphasizing the intimate relationship shared between Jesus and the betrayer.
Referring to a shallow bowl or platter. This object is central to the imagery, as it is the communal vessel from which participants would eat. The presence of a shared dish reinforces the idea of a shared meal and, by extension, shared life and trust. The betrayer is not an outsider but one who literally shares from the same source of sustenance and fellowship as Jesus.
Verse Breakdown
"And he answered and said unto them,"
This introductory clause establishes Jesus' response to the disciples' anxious questioning ("Is it I?"). It highlights Jesus' calm and authoritative demeanor even in the face of impending betrayal, demonstrating His divine knowledge and control over the unfolding events. His answer is deliberate and intentional, not a surprised reaction.
"It is one of the twelve,"
This phrase immediately narrows the scope of the betrayer's identity. It confirms that the traitor is not an external enemy or a random individual, but someone from Jesus' inner circle, one of the specifically chosen apostles. This revelation would have been particularly shocking and painful for the disciples, as it indicated a deep breach of trust within their most intimate community.
"that dippeth with me in the dish."
This final clause provides the specific, albeit still indirect, identifier. The act of dipping from a communal dish was a sign of close fellowship and shared intimacy, particularly during a sacred meal like the Passover. By pointing to this shared action, Jesus reveals that the betrayer is not merely "one of the twelve," but one who shares a profound bond of trust and communion with Him, making the betrayal all the more poignant and tragic.
Literary Devices
Mark 14:20 employs several powerful literary devices. Irony is central, as the act of sharing a dish, a symbol of intimacy and trust, becomes the very means of identifying the betrayer. This stark contrast between outward communion and inward treachery amplifies the tragic nature of Judas's actions. The verse also utilizes Foreshadowing, subtly pointing to the betrayer without explicitly naming Judas, building suspense and preparing the audience for the subsequent events of the betrayal. Furthermore, there is an element of Symbolism in the "dish" itself, representing shared life, sustenance, and covenant. The defilement of this symbol by an act of betrayal underscores the spiritual depth of Judas's sin.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Mark 14:20 profoundly illustrates the dark reality of betrayal, especially when it originates from within a circle of trust and intimacy. This incident is not merely a historical event but a theological statement about human depravity and the cost of discipleship. It reveals that even those closest to God can harbor darkness and succumb to temptation, yet it also underscores God's sovereign plan, which incorporates even the most heinous acts of human sin into His redemptive purpose. The foreknowledge of Jesus, coupled with His willingness to endure such betrayal, speaks volumes about His unwavering commitment to His mission and His profound love for humanity, even for His betrayer. This event serves as a stark reminder that true fellowship requires genuine loyalty and that even in the face of treachery, God's ultimate plan will prevail.
Reflection and Application
The scene in Mark 14:20, where Jesus identifies His betrayer through an act of shared intimacy, offers profound lessons for contemporary believers. It confronts us with the sobering reality that betrayal can emerge from the most unexpected places—even from within the church or our closest relationships. This calls for spiritual discernment and a realistic understanding of human nature, which, apart from Christ, is prone to sin and self-interest. More importantly, it serves as a powerful call to self-examination, echoing the disciples' urgent question, "Is it I?" We are challenged to regularly scrutinize our own hearts, motives, and loyalties, ensuring that our commitment to Christ is sincere and unwavering. Are we truly "dipping in the dish" with Jesus in genuine fellowship, or are we harboring a spirit of treachery, even subtly, through compromise, apathy, or unconfessed sin? This passage reminds us that true discipleship demands not just outward association but inward devotion and fidelity to our Lord, even when it is difficult or costly.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why didn't Jesus explicitly name Judas at this moment?
Jesus' indirect identification of Judas as "one of the twelve, that dippeth with me in the dish" serves several purposes. Firstly, it fulfills Old Testament prophecy, such as Psalm 41:9, which speaks of a trusted companion lifting his heel against Him. Secondly, it highlights the profound irony and tragedy of the betrayal – that it came from an intimate associate, not an obvious enemy. Explicitly naming Judas might have provoked an immediate confrontation or even prevented the betrayal, which was part of God's redemptive plan. By using a descriptive phrase, Jesus offers Judas one last opportunity for repentance, while also subtly revealing his identity to the other disciples without causing premature chaos. This veiled revelation emphasizes Jesus' divine foreknowledge and control, even over the darkest human actions.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Mark 14:20, though a moment of profound human betrayal, is ultimately a testament to the Christ-centered fulfillment of God's redemptive plan. Jesus, the Lamb of God, willingly entered into this betrayal, not as a victim caught off guard, but as the sovereign Son of God who knew "what was about to happen to him" (John 18:4). His identification of the betrayer, one with whom He shared the most intimate act of a meal, underscores the depth of His sacrifice. He allowed Himself to be betrayed by a friend, fulfilling prophecies like Psalm 41:9, to ultimately become the atoning sacrifice for all humanity. This act of betrayal, foreseen and permitted by Christ, was a necessary step towards the cross, where He would bear the sin of the world and secure salvation. Thus, even in the shadow of treachery, we see the unwavering resolve of Christ to accomplish His mission, demonstrating that His love is so vast that it embraces even the one who would betray Him, offering a path to redemption for all who believe, as beautifully articulated in Romans 5:8. The "dish" of shared fellowship, defiled by Judas, is ultimately transformed into the cup and bread of the New Covenant, representing Christ's body broken and blood shed for the forgiveness of sins, inviting all to a true and eternal communion with Him (Luke 22:19-20).