Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And they began to be sorrowful, and to say unto him one by one, Is it I? and another said, Is it I?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 they began G756 to be sorrowful G3076, and to G2532 say G3004 unto him G846 one by one G1527,G3385 Is it I G1473? and G2532 another G243 said,G3385 Is it I G1473?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
They became upset and began asking him, one after the other, "You don't mean me, do you?"
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
They began to be grieved and to ask Him one after another, “Surely not I?”
Ask
American Standard Version
They began to be sorrowful, and to say unto him one by one, Is it I?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
They began to be sorrowful, and to ask him one by one, “Surely not I?” And another said, “Surely not I?”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then they began to be sorowful and to say to him one by one, Is it I? And another, Is it I?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And they began to be sorrowful, and to say to him, one by one, `Is it I?' and another, `Is it I?'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Mark Sites (Jerusalem)
All Mark Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Mark Sites (Levant)
All Mark Sites (Levant) View full PDF
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table)
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 24,774 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Mark 14:19 captures a deeply poignant moment during the Last Supper, immediately following Jesus' declaration that one of His own disciples would betray Him. This verse vividly portrays the disciples' collective sorrow and individual introspection, as each, in turn, asks Jesus with profound apprehension, "Is it I?", revealing their genuine distress and the unsettling realization that such a heinous act could potentially stem from within their intimate circle.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within the solemn and highly charged narrative of the Last Supper, a pivotal event in Mark's Gospel that transitions from Jesus' public ministry to His passion. Preceding this verse, Jesus has just observed the Passover meal with His disciples and made the shocking pronouncement in Mark 14:18 that one of them, who was eating with Him, would betray Him. This declaration shatters the communal peace of the meal, immediately plunging the disciples into a state of profound distress and self-doubt. The subsequent verses (Mark 14:20-21) continue this dramatic tension, with Jesus subtly identifying the betrayer, setting the stage for the imminent arrest and crucifixion.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The setting is a private room in Jerusalem, where Jesus and His disciples are observing the Passover, a central Jewish festival commemorating Israel's liberation from slavery in Egypt. The Passover meal itself was a highly symbolic and communal event, emphasizing themes of deliverance, covenant, and shared identity. For a betrayal to occur during such a sacred meal, by one who shared bread with the host, was considered a profound violation of hospitality and trust, carrying immense cultural weight. The disciples' reaction reflects the societal expectation of loyalty within a close-knit group, especially a rabbinic circle, where the bond between master and disciple was sacred. This betrayal also fulfills ancient prophecies, such as Psalm 41:9, which speaks of a trusted friend lifting his heel against the psalmist.
  • Key Themes: Mark 14:19 contributes significantly to several overarching themes in Mark's Gospel. Firstly, it highlights the human fallibility and vulnerability of even those closest to Jesus; despite their devotion, the disciples are forced to confront their own capacity for failure. Secondly, it underscores the pain and reality of betrayal, a theme central to Jesus' suffering, as He is betrayed not by an enemy, but by one of His chosen twelve. This moment intensifies the dramatic irony that permeates the passion narrative, as the audience knows Judas's identity, while the disciples remain tragically unaware, emphasizing the profound isolation Jesus would soon experience. Finally, it sets the stage for the unfolding Messianic suffering, demonstrating that the path to redemption would involve profound personal anguish and treachery, as prophesied in passages like Isaiah 53.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • sorrowful (Greek, lypéō', G3076): Derived from lypē (grief, pain), this verb signifies to distress, cause grief, or to be sad. In this context, it describes the disciples' immediate and profound emotional reaction—a deep sorrow or grief that goes beyond mere sadness, indicative of their shock and the personal pain caused by the prospect of betrayal from within their intimate circle. It suggests a heavy heart, burdened by the gravity of Jesus' announcement.
  • one by one (Greek, heîs_ kath' _heîs', G1527): This phrase, literally "one according to one," emphasizes the individual and sequential nature of the disciples' questioning. It highlights that their response was not a chaotic outcry, but a deliberate, personal, and introspective inquiry from each disciple. This detail underscores the personal impact of Jesus' words on every individual and their immediate self-examination.
  • Is it I? (Greek, mḗti_ _egṓ', G3385): This interrogative particle mḗti (from and tis) introduces a question that anticipates a negative answer, often implying a sense of apprehension or a fearful hope that the answer is "no." Coupled with egō ("I"), the question is not a confident denial ("Surely it's not me!"), but rather a humble, anxious, "It's not me, is it?" or "Surely it's not I?" This nuance reveals their profound uncertainty, their recognition of their own human weakness, and a genuine fear that they might unknowingly be capable of such a terrible act.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And they began to be sorrowful": This clause immediately establishes the emotional atmosphere. The verb "began" (árchomai) indicates the onset of a new state, suggesting a sudden shift from the solemn but perhaps peaceful Passover meal to one of profound grief and distress. This sorrow is not merely sadness but a deep, internal anguish provoked by the shocking revelation of betrayal from within their trusted ranks.
  • "and to say unto him one by one": This phrase describes the disciples' collective yet individualized response. The direct address "unto him" signifies their immediate turning to Jesus for clarification and reassurance. The emphasis on "one by one" underscores the personal nature of the inquiry, indicating that each disciple felt the weight of the accusation and was compelled to examine their own heart before the Lord, rather than engaging in mutual suspicion or accusation.
  • "Is it I? and another said, Is it I?": This repeated question is the heart of the verse. As explored in the key word analysis, the Greek phrasing suggests a fearful, self-doubting inquiry rather than a confident denial. The repetition emphasizes the pervasive fear and introspection among the disciples. It highlights their humility, their awareness of their own fallibility, and their genuine concern that they might, in some unknown way, be the one capable of such a heinous act against their beloved Master. It is a moment of profound vulnerability and self-assessment.

Literary Devices

Mark 14:19 effectively employs several literary devices to heighten its dramatic and theological impact. The most prominent is Repetition, with the phrase "Is it I?" being reiterated by multiple disciples. This not only emphasizes the widespread distress and individual introspection among the twelve but also creates a rhythmic, almost desperate chorus of self-examination. Furthermore, the scene is imbued with Dramatic Iron irony, as the audience, having read or heard the Gospels, is aware that Judas Iscariot is the betrayer, while the disciples remain tragically ignorant, each suspecting themselves. This irony amplifies the pathos of the moment and underscores the profound isolation Jesus experiences as He faces betrayal from within His inner circle. The disciples' sorrow and questioning also serve as Foreshadowing, hinting at the profound suffering Jesus is about to endure, not only from His enemies but also from the treachery of a friend, and preparing the reader for the subsequent events of the passion narrative.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Mark 14:19 serves as a profound theological statement on human fallibility and the nature of true discipleship. The disciples' immediate response of self-examination, rather than accusation, reveals a commendable humility and a recognition of their own potential for failure, even in their intimate walk with Christ. This scene underscores the painful reality that betrayal often comes from within the closest circles, highlighting the depth of Jesus' suffering. The question "Is it I?" resonates through the ages as a call to constant spiritual introspection, reminding believers that vigilance against sin and self-deception is a perpetual necessity, and that genuine faithfulness requires a humble acknowledgment of one's own capacity for compromise and sin.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The disciples' response in Mark 14:19 offers a timeless and powerful lesson for every believer. When confronted with the possibility of sin, failure, or even betrayal within a community, our first impulse should not be to point fingers or assume moral superiority, but rather to humbly and honestly examine our own hearts. The question "Is it I?" embodies a posture of spiritual humility and self-awareness, acknowledging our inherent human weakness and our susceptibility to temptation. This scene challenges us to cultivate a spirit of introspection, to regularly assess our motives, actions, and faithfulness before God, and to remain vigilant against the subtle ways sin can creep into our lives, even when we believe ourselves to be most secure. It reminds us that true discipleship involves a continuous process of self-assessment and dependence on divine grace to remain steadfast.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do I typically react when sin or failure is exposed within my community or church? Do I first look inward or outward?
  • In what areas of my life might I be unknowingly susceptible to compromising my faith or betraying Christ's trust?
  • What does the disciples' question "Is it I?" teach me about humility and self-awareness in my walk with God?
  • How can I cultivate a more consistent practice of honest self-examination and reliance on God's grace to overcome my own weaknesses?

FAQ

Why did the disciples ask "Is it I?" instead of accusing one another?

Answer: The disciples' collective question, "Is it I?", rather than an immediate accusation of one another, reveals several profound aspects of their character and their relationship with Jesus. Firstly, it demonstrates a remarkable degree of humility and self-awareness. They recognized their own human fallibility and the potential for sin, even within their close relationship with the Master. The Greek phrasing of the question, using mēti, implies a fearful "Surely it's not I?" rather than a confident denial, underscoring their genuine apprehension. Secondly, it reflects the deep respect and love they had for Jesus; their primary concern was the gravity of the betrayal itself and its impact on Him, not merely their own innocence. Finally, it highlights the intimate bond they shared as a group, where mutual suspicion was not their immediate reaction, but rather a shared sense of dread and introspection. This response sets a powerful example for believers today, emphasizing the importance of personal accountability and humility in the face of potential sin.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Mark 14:19, with its raw depiction of human fallibility and the pain of impending betrayal, finds its ultimate fulfillment and deepest meaning in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While the disciples grapple with their own potential for failure, Jesus, the very object of their sorrow and the victim of the coming treachery, stands as the perfectly faithful one. His willingness to endure betrayal, even from one He had chosen and loved, underscores the depth of His commitment to His redemptive mission. The sorrow of the disciples foreshadows the immense grief and suffering Jesus would experience, not only physically but emotionally and spiritually, as He bore the weight of human sin, including the sin of betrayal. Ultimately, Jesus' response to their questions, and His subsequent journey to the cross, reveals Him as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, the one who, though betrayed, offers forgiveness and new life. His suffering, culminating in His death and resurrection, is the divine answer to the very human capacity for sin and betrayal depicted in this verse, offering reconciliation and restoration to all who, like the disciples, humbly ask, "Is it I?", and turn to Him for grace and mercy, as highlighted in passages like Romans 5:8.

Copy as

Commentary on Mark 14 verses 12–31

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

In these verses we have,

I. Christ's eating the passover with his disciples, the night before he died, with the joys and comforts of which ordinance he prepared himself for his approaching sorrows, the full prospect of which did not indispose him for that solemnity. Note, No apprehension of trouble, come or coming, should put us by, or put us out of frame for, our attendance on holy ordinances, as we have opportunity for it.

1.Christ ate the passover at the usual time when the other Jews did, as Dr. Whitby had fully made out, and not, as Dr. Hammond would have it, the night before. It was on the first day of that feast, which (taking in all the eight days of the feast) was called, The feast of unleavened bread, even that day when they killed the passover, Mar 14:12.

2.He directed his disciples how to find the place where he intended to eat the passover; and hereby gave such another proof of his infallible knowledge of things distant and future (which to us seem altogether contingent), as he had given when he sent them for the ass on which he rode in triumph (Mar 11:6); "Go into the city (for the passover must be eaten in Jerusalem), and there shall meet you a man bearing a pitcher of water (a servant sent for water to clean the rooms in his master's house); follow him, go in where he goes, enquire for his master, the good man of the house (Mar 14:14), and desire him to show you a room." No doubt, the inhabitants of Jerusalem had rooms fitted up to be let out, for this occasion, to those that came out of the country to keep the passover, and one of those Christ made use of; not any friend's house, nor any house he had formerly frequented, for then he would have said, "Go to such a friend," or, "You know where we used to be, go thither and prepare." Probably he went where he was not known, that he might be undisturbed with his disciples. Perhaps he notified it by a sign, to conceal it from Judas, that he might not know till he came to the place; and by such a sign to intimate that he will dwell in the clean heart, that is, washed as with pure water. Where he designs to come, a pitcher of water must go before him; see Isa 1:16-18.

3.He ate the passover in an upper room furnished, estrōmenon - laid with carpets (so Dr. Hammond); it would seem to have been a very handsome dining-room. Christ was far from affecting any thing that looked stately in eating his common meals; on the contrary, he chose that which was homely, sat down on the grass: but, when he was to keep a sacred feast, in honour of that he would be at the expense of as good a room as he could get. God looks not at outward pomp, but he looks at the tokens and expressions of inward reverence for a divine institution, which, it is to be feared, those want, who, to save charges, deny themselves decencies in the worship of God.

4.He ate it with the twelve, who were his family, to teach those who have the charge of families, not only families of children, but families of servants, or families of scholars, or pupils, to keep up religion among them, and worship God with them. If Christ came with the twelve, then Judas was with them, though he was at this time contriving to betray his Master; and it is plain by what follows (Mar 14:20), that he was there: he did not absent himself, lest he could have been suspected; had his seat been empty at this feast, they would have said, as Saul of David, He is not clean, surely he is not clean, Sa1 20:26. Hypocrites, though they know it is at their peril, yet crowd into special ordinances, to keep up their repute, and palliate their secret wickedness. Christ did not exclude him from the feast, though he knew his wickedness, for it was not as yet become public and scandalous. Christ, designing to put the keys of the kingdom of heaven into the hands of men, who can judge only according to outward appearance, would hereby both direct and encourage them in their admissions to his table, to be satisfied with a justifiable profession, because they cannot discern the root of bitterness till it springs up.

II. Christ's discourse with his disciples, as they were eating the passover. It is probable that they had discourse, according to the custom of the feast, of the deliverance of Israel out of Egypt, and the preservation of the first-born, and were as pleasant as they used to be together on this occasion, till Christ told them that which would mix trembling with their joys.

1.They were pleasing themselves with the society of their Master; but he tells them that they must now presently lose him; The Son of man is betrayed; and they knew, for he had often told them, what followed - If he be betrayed, the next news you will hear of him, is, that he is crucified and slain; God hath determined it concerning him, and he agrees to it; The Son of man goes, as it is written of him, Mar 14:21. It was written in the counsels of God, and written in the prophecies of the Old Testament, not one jot or tittle of either of which can fall to the ground.

2.They were pleasing themselves with the society one of another, but Christ casts a damp upon the joy of that, by telling them, One of you that eateth with me shall betray me, Mar 14:18. Christ said this, if it might be, to startle the conscience of Judas, and to awaken him to repent of his wickedness, and to draw back (for it was not too late) from the brink of the pit. But for aught that appears, he who was most concerned in the warning, was least concerned at it. All the rest were affected with it. (1.) They began to be sorrowful. As the remembrance of our former falls into sin, so the fear of the like again, doth often much embitter the comfort of our spiritual feasts, and damp our joy. Here were the bitter herbs, with which this passover-feast was taken. (2.) They began to be suspicious of themselves; they said one by one, Is it I? And another said, Is it I? They are to be commended for their charity, that they were more jealous of themselves than of one another. It is the law of charity, to hope the best (Co1 13:5-7), because we assuredly know, therefore we may justly suspect, more evil by ourselves than by our brethren. They are also to be commended for their acquiescence in what Christ said; they trusted more to his words than to their own hearts; and therefore do not say, "I am sure it is not I," but, "Lord, is it I? see if there be such a way of wickedness in us, such a root of bitterness, and discover it to us, that we may pluck up that root, and stop up that way."

Now, in answer to their enquiry, Christ saith that, [1.] Which would make them easy; "It is not you, or you; it is this that now dips with me in the dish; the adversary and enemy is this wicked Judas." [2.] Which, one would think, should make Judas very uneasy. If he go on in his undertaking, it is upon the sword's point, for woe to that many by whom the Son of man is betrayed; he is undone, for every undone; his sin will soon find him out; and it were better for him that he had never been born, and had never had a being than such a miserable one as he must have. It is very probable that Judas encouraged himself in it with this thought, that his Master had often said he must be betrayed; "And if it must be done, surely God will not find fault with him that doth it, for who hath resisted his will?" As that objector argues, Rom 9:19. But Christ tells him that this will be no shelter or excuse to him; The Son of man indeed goes; as it is written of him, as a lamb to the slaughter; but woe to that man by whom he is betrayed. God's decree to permit the sins of men, and bring glory to himself out of them, do neither necessitate their sins, nor determine to them, nor will they be any excuse of the sin, or mitigation of the punishment. Christ was delivered indeed by the determinate counsel and fore-knowledge of God; but, notwithstanding that, it is with wicked hands that he is crucified and slain, Act 2:23.

III. The institution of the Lord's supper.

1.It was instituted in the close of a supper, when they were sufficiently fed with the paschal lamb, to show that in the Lord's supper there is no bodily repast intended; to preface it with such a thing, is to revive Moses again. But it is food for the soul only, and therefore a very little of that which is for the body, as much as will serve for a sign, is enough. It was at the close of the passover-supper, which by this was evangelized, and then superseded and set aside. Much of the doctrine and duty of the eucharist is illustrated to us by the law of the passover (Ex. 12); for the Old Testament institutions, though they do not bind us, yet instruct us, by the help of a gospel-key to them. And these two ordinances lying here so near together, it may be good to compare them, and observe how much shorter and plainer the institution of the Lord's supper is, than that of the passover was. Christ's yoke is easy in comparison with that of the ceremonial law, and his ordinances are more spiritual.

2.It was instituted by the example of Christ himself; not with the ceremony and solemnity of a law, as the ordinance of baptism was, after Christ's resurrection (Mat 28:19), with, Be it enacted by the authority aforesaid, by a power given to Christ in heaven and on earth (Mat 28:18); but by the practice of our Master himself, because intended for those who are already his disciples, and taken into covenant with him: but it has the obligation of the law, and was intended to remain in full force, power, and virtue, till his second coming.

3.It was instituted with blessing and giving of thanks; the gifts of common providence are to be so received (Ti1 4:4, Ti1 4:5), much more than the gifts of special grace. He blessed (Mar 14:22), and gave thanks, Mar 14:23. At his other meals, he was wont to bless, and give thanks (Mar 6:41; Mar 8:7) so remarkably, that he was known by it, Luk 24:30, Luk 24:31. And he did the same at this meal.

4.It was instituted to be a memorial of his death; and therefore he broke the bread, to show how it pleased the Lord to bruise him; and he called the wine, which is the blood of the grape, the blood of the New Testament. The death Christ died was a bloody death, and frequent mention is made of the blood, the precious blood, as the pride of our redemption; for the blood is the life, and made atonement for the soul, Lev 17:11-14. The pouring out of the blood was the most sensible indication of the pouring out of his soul, Isa 53:12. Blood has a voice (Gen 4:10); and therefore blood is so often mentioned, because it was to speak, Heb 12:24. It is called the blood of the New Testament; for the covenant of grace became a testament, and of force by the death of Christ, the testator, Heb 9:16. It is said to be shed for many, to justify many (Isa 53:11), to bring many sons to glory, Heb 2:10. It was sufficient for many, being of infinite value; it has been of use to many; we read of a great multitude which no man could number, that had all washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb (Rev 7:9-14); and still it is a fountain opened. How comfortable is this to poor repenting sinners, that the blood of Christ is shed for many! And if for many, why not for me? If for sinners, sinners of the Gentiles, the chief of sinners, then why not for me?

5.It was instituted to be a ratification of the covenant made with us in him, and a sign of the conveyance of those benefits to us, which were purchased for us by his death; and therefore he broke the bread to them (Mar 14:22), and said, Take, eat of it: he gave the cup to them, and ordered them to drink of it, Mar 14:23. Apply the doctrine of Christ crucified to yourselves, and let it be meat and drink to your souls, strengthening, nourishing, and refreshing, to you, and the support and comfort of your spiritual life.

6.It was instituted with an eye to the happiness of heaven, and to be an earnest and fore-taste of that, and thereby to put our mouths out of taste for all the pleasures and delights of sense (Mar 14:25); I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine, as it is a bodily refreshment. I have done with it. No one, having tasted spiritual delights, straightway desires sensitive ones, for he saith, The spiritual is better (Luk 5:39); but every one that hath tasted spiritual delights, straightway desires eternal ones, for he saith, Those are better still; and therefore let me drink no more of the fruit of the vine, it is dead and flat to those that have been made to drink of the river of God's pleasures; but, Lord, hasten the day, when I shall drink it new and fresh in the kingdom of God, where it shall be for ever new, and in perfection.

7.It was closed with a hymn, Mar 14:26. Though Christ was in the midst of his enemies, yet he did not, for fear of them, omit this sweet duty of singing psalms. Paul and Silas sang, when the prisoners heard them. This was an evangelical song, and gospel times are often spoken of in the Old Testament, as times of rejoicing, and praise is expressed by singing. This was Christ's swan-like song, which he sung just before he entered upon his agony; probably, that which is usually sung, Psa 113:1-9 to 118.

IV. Christ's discourse with his disciples, as they were returning to Bethany by moonlight. When the had sung the hymn, presently they went out. It was now near bedtime, but our Lord Jesus had his heart so much upon his suffering, that he would not come into the tabernacle of his house, norgo up into his bed, nor give sleep to his eyes, when that work was to be done, Psa 132:3, Psa 132:4. The Israelites were forbidden to go out of their houses the night that they ate the passover, for fear of the sword of the destroying angel, Exo 12:22, Exo 12:23. But because Christ, the great shepherd, was to be smitten, he went out purposely to expose himself to the sword, as a champion; they evaded the destroyer, but Christ conquered him, and brought destructions to a perpetual end.

1.Christ here foretels that in his sufferings he should be deserted by all his disciples; "You will all be offended because of me, this night. I know you will (Mar 14:27), and what I tell you now, is no other than what the scripture has told you before; I will smite the shepherd, and then the sheep will be scattered." Christ knew this before, and yet welcomed them at his table; he sees the falls and miscarriages of his disciples, and yet doth not refuse them. Nor should we be discouraged from coming to the Lord's supper, by the fear of relapsing into sin afterward; but, the greater of our danger is, the more need we have to fortify ourselves by the diligent conscientious use of holy ordinances. Christ tells them that they would be offended in him, would begin to question whether he were the Messiah or no, when they saw him overpowered by his enemies. Hitherto, they had continued with him in his temptations; though they had sometimes offended him, yet they had not been offended in him, nor turned the back upon him; but now the storm would be so great, that they would all slip their anchors, and be in danger of shipwreck. Some trials are more particular (as Rev 2:10, The devil shall cast some of you into prison); but others are more general, an hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, Rev 3:10. The smiting of the shepherd is often the scattering of the sheep: magistrates, ministers, masters of families, if these are, as they should be, shepherds to those under their charge, when any thing comes amiss to them, the whole flock suffers for it, and is endangered by it.

But Christ encourages them with a promise that they shall rally again, shall return both to their duty and to their comfort (Mar 14:28); "After I am risen, I will gather you in from all the places wither you are scattered, Eze 34:12. I will go before you into Galilee, will see our friends, and enjoy one another there."

2.He foretels that he should be denied particularly by Peter. When they went out to go to the mount of Olives, we may suppose that they dropped Judas (he stole away from them), whereupon the rest began to think highly of themselves, that they stuck to their Master, when Judas quitted him. But Christ tells them, that though they should be kept by his grace from Judas's apostasy, yet they would have no reason to boast of their constancy. Note, Though God keeps us from being as bad as the worst, yet we may well be ashamed to think that we are not better than we are.

(1.)Peter is confident that he should not do so ill as the rest of his disciples (Mar 14:29); Though all should be offended, all his brethren here present, yet will not I. He supposes himself not only stronger than others, but so much stronger, as to be able to receive the shock of a temptation, and bear up against it, all alone; to stand, though nobody stood by him. It is bred in the bone with us, to think well of ourselves, and trust to our own hearts.

(2.)Christ tells him that he will do worse than any of them. They will all desert him, but he will deny him; not once, but thrice; and that presently; "This day, even this night before the cock crow twice, thou wilt deny that ever thou hadst any knowledge of me, or acquaintance with me, as one ashamed and afraid to own me."

(3.)He stands to his promise; "If I should die with thee, I will not deny thee; I will adhere to thee, though it cost me my life:" and, no doubt, he thought as he said. Judas said nothing like this, when Christ told him he would betray him. He sinned by contrivance, Peter by surprise; he devised the wickedness (Mic 2:1), Peter was overtaken in this fault, Gal 6:1. It was ill done of Peter, to contradict his Master. If he had said, with fear and trembling, "Lord, give me grace to keep me from denying thee, lead me not into this temptation, deliver me from this evil," it might have been prevented: but they were all thus confident; they who said, Lord, is it I? now said, It shall never be me. Being acquitted from their fear of betraying Christ, they were now secure. But he that thinks he stands, must learn to take heed lest he fall; and he that girdeth on the harness, not boast as though he had put it off.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 12–31. Public domain.
Copy as
Pseudo-Jerome (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
The evening of the day points out the evening of the world; for the last, who are the first to receive the penny of eternal life, come about the eleventh hour. All the disciples then are touched by the Lord; so that there is amongst them the harmony of the harp, all the well attuned strings answer with accordant tone; for it goes on: And they began to be sorrowful, and to say unto him one by one, Is it I? One of them however, unstrung, and steeped in the love of money, said, Is it I, Lord? as Matthew testifies.

Again, He says, One out of the twelve, as it were separate from them, for the wolf carries away from the flock the sheep which he has taken, and the sheep which quits the fold lies open to the bite of the wolf. But Judas does not withdraw his foot from his traitorous design though once and again pointed at, wherefore his punishment is foretold, that the death denounced upon him might correct him, whom shame could not overcome; wherefore it goes on: The Son of man indeed goeth, as it is written of him.

But because many do good, in the way that Judas did, without its profiting them, there follows: Woe to that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! good were it for that man if he had never been born.

That is, hidden in his mother's inmost womb, for it is better for a man not to exist than to exist for torments.
Origen of AlexandriaAD 253
COMMENTARY ON MATTHEW 50
If the eleven apostles were of good conscience, having not in any way betrayed their teacher, why were they grieved, as though it might have been that he was speaking of one of them? I think that each of them knew from Jesus’ teaching that human freedom is infinitely changeable and may easily be turned toward evil. It may happen, in the struggle against principalities and powers and rulers of this world of darkness, that one may fall quite unexpectedly into evil, either being deceived or overcome by demonic powers. Thus, each disciple feared lest it might be he who was foreknown as betrayer.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(ubi sup.) Where it is evident that He did not proclaim him openly to all, lest He should make him the more shameless; at the same time He did not altogether keep it silent, lest thinking that he was not discovered, he should boldly hasten to betray Him.
BedeAD 735
On the Gospel of Mark
But they began to be sorrowful, and to say to him one by one, "Is it I?" And surely the eleven apostles knew that they were not contemplating anything like this against the Lord, but they trusted the teacher more than themselves; and fearing their own weakness, they sorrowfully inquired about a sin of which they had no consciousness.
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(ubi sup.) The Lord who had foretold His Passion, prophesied also of the traitor, in order to give him room for repentance, that understanding that his thoughts were known, he might repent. Wherefore it is said, And in the evening he cometh with the twelve. And as they sat and did eat, Jesus said, Verily I say unto you, One of you which eateth with me shall betray me.

(ubi sup.) That is, Judas, who when the others were sad and held back their hands, puts forth his hand with his Master into the dish. And because He had before said, One of you shall betray me, and yet the traitor perseveres in his evil, He accuses him more openly, without however pointing out his name.

(ubi sup.) Woe too to that man, to-day and for ever, who comes to the Lord's table with an evil intent. For he, after the example of Judas, betrays the Lord, not indeed to Jewish sinners, but to his own sinning members. It goes on: Good were it for that man if he had never been born.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
But how could they eat reclining, when the law ordered that standing and upright they should eat the Passover? It is probable that they had first fulfilled the legal Passover, and had reclined, when He began to give them His own Passover.

But the other disciples began to be saddened on account of the word of the Lord; for although they were free from this passion, yet they trust Him who knows all hearts, rather than themselves. It goes on: And he answered and said unto them, It is one of the twelve, that dippeth with me in the dish.

The word here used, goeth, shows that the death of Christ was not forced but voluntary.

For as respects the end for which he was designed, it would have been better for him to have been born, if he had not been the betrayer, for God created him for good works; but after he had fallen into such dreadful wickedness, it would have been better for him never to have been born.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Mark 14:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.