TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on Mark 11 verses 27–33
We have here Christ examined by the great Sanhedrim concerning his authority; for they claimed a power to call prophets to an account concerning their mission. They came to him when he was walking in the temple, not for his diversion, but teaching the people, first one company and then another. The Peripatetic philosophers were so called from the custom they had of walking when they taught. The cloisters, or piazzas, in the courts of the temple, were fitted for this purpose. The great men were vexed to see him followed and heard with attention, and therefore came to him with some solemnity, and did as it were arraign him at the bar with this question, By what authority doest thou these things? Mar 11:28. Now observe,
I. How they designed hereby to run him aground, and embarrass him. If they could make it out before the people, that he had not a legal mission, that he was not duly ordained, though he was ever so well qualified, and preached ever so profitably and well, they would tell the people that they ought not to hear him. This they made the last refuge of an obstinate unbelief; because they were resolved not to receive his doctrine, they were resolved to find some flaw or other in his commission, and will conclude it invalid, if it be not produced and ratified in their court. Thus the Papists resolve their controversy with us very much into the mission of our ministers, and if they have but any pretence to overthrow that, they think they have gained their point, though we have the scripture ever so much on our side. But this is indeed a question, which all that act either as magistrates or ministers, ought to be furnished with a good answer to, and often put to themselves, By what authority do I these things? For how can men preach except they be sent? Or how can they act with comfort, or confidence, or hope of success, except they be authorized? Jer 23:32.
II. How he effectually ran them aground, and embarrassed them, with this question, "What are your thoughts concerning the baptism of John? Was it from heaven, or of men? By what authority did John preach, and baptize, and gather disciples? Answer me, Mar 11:30. Deal fairly and ingenuously, and give a categorical answer, one way or the other." By this resolve of their question into this, our Saviour intimates how near akin his doctrine and baptism were to John's; they had the same original, and the same design and tendency - to introduce the gospel kingdom. Christ might with the better grace put this question to them, because they had sent a committee of their own house to examine John, Joh 1:19. "Now," saith Christ, "what was the result of your enquiries concerning him?"
They knew what they thought of this question; they could not but think that John Baptist was a man sent of God. But the difficulty was, what they should say to it now. Men that oblige not themselves to speak as they think (which is a certain rule) cannot avoid perplexing themselves thus.
1.If they own the baptism of John to be from heaven, as really it was, they shame themselves; for Christ will presently turn it upon them, Why did ye not then believe him, and receive his baptism? They could not bear that Christ should say this, but they could bear it that their own consciences should say so, because they had an art of stifling and silencing them, and because what conscience said, though it might gall and grate them a little, would not shame them; and then they would do well enough, who looked no further than Saul's care, when he was convicted, Honour me now before this people, Sa1 15:30.
2.If they say, "It is of men, he was not sent of God, but his doctrine and baptism were inventions of his own," they expose themselves, the people will be ready to do them a mischief, or a least clamour upon them; for all men counted John that he was a prophet indeed, and therefore they could not bear that he should be reflected on. Note, There is a carnal slavish fear, which not only wicked subjects but wicked rulers likewise are liable to, which God makes use of as a means to keep the world in some order, and to suppress violence, that it shall not always grow up into a rod of wickedness. Now by this dilemma to which Christ brought them, (1.) They were confounded and baffled, and forced to make a dishonourable retreat; to pretend ignorance - We cannot tell (and that was mortification enough to those proud men), but really to discover the greatest malice and wilfulness. What Christ did by his wisdom, we must labour to do by our well doing - put to silence the ignorance of foolish men, Pe1 2:15. (2.) Christ came off with honour, and justified himself in refusing to give them an answer to their imperious demand; Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things. They did not deserve to be told; for it was plain that they contended not for truth, but victory; nor did he need to tell them, for the works which he did, told them plainly that he had authority from God to do what he did; since no man could do those miracles which he did unless God were with him. Let them wait but three or four days, and his resurrection shall tell them who gave him his authority, for by that he will be declared to be the Son of God with power, as by their rejecting of him, notwithstanding, they will be declared to be the enemies of God.
They envied the Lamp, and were in the dark, wherefore it is said, I have ordained a lamp for mine anointed; his enemies will I clothe with shame. (Ps. 132:17, 18) There follows: And Jesus answering saith unto them, Neither do I tell you by what authority I do these things.
(ubi sup.) And indeed, when they say, By what authority doest thou these things, they doubt its being the power of God, and wish it to be understood that what He did was the devil's work. When they add also, Who gave thee this authority, they evidently deny that He is the Son of God, since they believe that He works miracles, not by His own but by another's power.
(ubi sup.) The Lord might indeed have confuted the cavils of his tempters by a direct answer, but prudently puts them a question, that they might be condemned either by their silence or their speaking, which is evident from what is added, And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say, Why then did ye not believe him? As if He had said, He whom you confess to have had his prophecy from heaven bore testimony of Me, and ye have heard from him, by what authority I do these things. It goes on: But if we shall say, Of men; they feared the people. They saw then that whatever they answered, they should fall into a snare; fearing to be stoned, they feared still more the confession of the truth. Wherefore it goes on: And they answered and said unto Jesus, We cannot tell.
(ubi sup.) As if He had said, I will not tell you what I know, since ye will not confess what ye know. Further, we must observe that knowledge is hidden from those who seek it, principally for two reasons, namely, when he who seeks for it either has not sufficient capacity to understand what he seeks for, or when through contempt for the truth, or some other reason, he is unworthy of having that for which he seeks opened to him.
And answering, they say to Jesus: We do not know. And Jesus, responding, said to them: Neither do I tell you by what authority I do these things. I do not tell you what I know, because you do not want to admit what you know. Most justly rejected, they indeed went away confused. And it was fulfilled what in the psalm the Father God says through the prophet: I have prepared a lamp for my Christ, that is, John himself. I will clothe his enemies with shame (Psalm 131). It should be noted, moreover, that the knowledge of the truth is to be hidden from those who seek it for two main reasons. Namely, when he who asks is either less capable of understanding what he seeks, or is unworthy because of hatred or contempt of the truth itself, to whom it ought to be revealed what he seeks. For one of these reasons, the Lord said: I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. For the other reason, he commanded the disciples: Do not give what is holy to dogs, nor throw your pearls before swine.
They were angry with the Lord, for having cast out of the temple those who had made it a place of merchandize, and therefore they come up to Him, to question and tempt Him. Wherefore it is said: And they come again to Jerusalem: and as he was walking in the temple, there come to him the Chief Priests, and the Scribes, and the elders, and say unto him, By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee authority to do these things? As if they had said, Who art thou that doest these things? Dost thou make thyself a doctor, and ordain thyself Chief Priest?
Further, they said this, thinking to bring Him to judgment, so that if He said, by mine own power, they might lay hold upon Him; but if He said, by the power of another, they might make the people leave Him, for they believed Him to be God. But the Lord asks them concerning John, not without a reason, nor in a sophistical way, but because John had borne witness of Him. Wherefore there follows: And Jesus answered and said unto them, I will also ask of you one question, and answer me, and I will tell you by what authority I do these things. The baptism of John, was it from heaven, or of men? answer me.
Continue studying Mark 11:33 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Mark 11:33 concludes a profound exchange between Jesus and the chief priests, scribes, and elders in Jerusalem, revealing the religious leaders' spiritual blindness and strategic evasion. Confronted about the source of His authority after cleansing the Temple, Jesus masterfully deflects their manipulative question by posing His own regarding John the Baptist's authority. Their feigned ignorance, expressed as "We cannot tell," prompts Jesus' equally strategic refusal to disclose the source of His power, thereby protecting divine truth from insincere scrutiny and underscoring the unchallengeable nature of His commission.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Mark 11:33 is rich in Irony, as the religious leaders, who are supposed to be the custodians of truth, resort to a blatant lie ("We cannot tell") to avoid accountability. This is further amplified by Jesus' Strategic Silence, where His refusal to answer directly serves as a more potent response than any verbal explanation could be, exposing their insincerity. The entire exchange functions as a Rhetorical Trap, initiated by Jesus' counter-question, which forces the leaders into an impossible position, revealing their true motives. The leaders themselves act as a Foil to Jesus, highlighting His unwavering integrity and divine wisdom against their cowardice and manipulative tactics.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
This passage powerfully illustrates the clash between divine truth and human deception, and the inherent authority of God's Son versus the self-serving authority of religious institutions. Jesus' refusal to answer is not an admission of lacking authority, but a demonstration that divine truth is not to be cast before those who are unwilling or unable to receive it sincerely. It highlights the principle that genuine inquiry is a prerequisite for revelation, and that God does not owe an explanation to those whose hearts are hardened and whose questions are designed to trap rather than to learn. This encounter foreshadows the broader rejection of Jesus by the religious establishment, rooted in their fear of losing control and their spiritual blindness to God's work among them.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Mark 11:33 offers profound lessons for navigating interactions where truth is not genuinely sought, but rather used as a weapon or a trap. It challenges us to cultivate discernment, recognizing when questions are asked out of sincere inquiry versus manipulative intent. In a world often characterized by skepticism and hostility towards faith, Jesus' example teaches us the wisdom of strategic silence or indirect answers when direct engagement would be futile or compromise sacred truths. We are called to uphold the absolute authority of God's Word and the person of Christ, understanding that their validity does not depend on human validation or approval. This passage encourages us to prioritize spiritual integrity over the need to always "win" an argument, trusting that God's truth will ultimately prevail, even when met with evasion.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why didn't Jesus just tell them by what authority He acted?
Answer: Jesus did not directly answer the religious leaders' question because their inquiry was not a genuine search for truth, but a trap designed to discredit Him and His ministry. They had already demonstrated their unwillingness to acknowledge clear divine revelation, as evidenced by their refusal to affirm John the Baptist's authority, which they knew to be from God (Mark 11:32). To explain His divine authority to those who had already rejected lesser truths would have been akin to "casting pearls before swine" (Matthew 7:6), a futile exercise that would have subjected sacred truth to their scorn. Jesus' refusal was a strategic act of wisdom, protecting His mission and implicitly condemning their spiritual blindness and hypocrisy.
What was the significance of John the Baptist's authority in this exchange?
Answer: John the Baptist's authority was crucial because he was God's chosen forerunner to the Messiah, preparing the way for Jesus (Mark 1:2-3). His ministry and baptism were widely accepted by the people as being from God (Mark 11:32). By asking about John's authority, Jesus forced the religious leaders into a dilemma. If they acknowledged John's divine authority, they would implicitly condemn themselves for not having believed him, and consequently, for not recognizing Jesus, whom John proclaimed. If they denied John's divine authority, they would face the wrath of the people. Their inability to answer revealed their spiritual cowardice and their rejection of God's clear revelation through John, which directly paralleled their rejection of Jesus' authority.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Mark 11:33, though seemingly a moment of impasse, profoundly reinforces the Christ-centered narrative of the Gospels. Jesus' unchallengeable authority, which the religious leaders sought to undermine, is a core attribute of His divine nature. His actions in the Temple, and indeed His entire ministry, were not by human commission but by the inherent authority of the Son of God, sent by the Father (John 5:19-23). This encounter prefigures the ultimate display of His authority in His death and resurrection, where He would declare, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me" (Matthew 28:18). The leaders' rejection of Jesus' authority, rooted in their fear and unbelief, tragically fulfills Old Testament prophecies of the Messiah being rejected by His own people (Isaiah 53:3). Yet, it is through this very rejection that Christ's ultimate redemptive authority is established, as He becomes the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), exercising His power to forgive sins and grant eternal life (Mark 2:10). Thus, this strategic silence in Mark 11:33 serves to highlight the sovereign and unassailable authority of Christ, whose power is not dependent on human recognition but is foundational to the very fabric of salvation history.