Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And he released unto them him that for sedition and murder was cast into prison, whom they had desired; but he delivered Jesus to their will.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 he released G630 unto them G846 him that for G1223 sedition G4714 and G2532 murder G5408 was cast G906 into G1519 prison G5438, whom G3739 they had desired G154; but G1161 he delivered G3860 Jesus G2424 to their G846 will G2307.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
he released the man who had been thrown in prison for insurrection and murder, the one they had asked for; and Yeshua he surrendered to their will.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
As they had requested, he released the one imprisoned for insurrection and murder, and handed Jesus over to their will.
Ask
American Standard Version
And he released him that for insurrection and murder had been cast into prison, whom they asked for; but Jesus he delivered up to their will.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He released him who had been thrown into prison for insurrection and murder, for whom they asked, but he delivered Yeshua up to their will.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And he let loose vnto them him that for insurrection and murder was cast into prison, whome they desired, and deliuered Iesus to doe with him what they would.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and he released him who because of sedition and murder hath been cast into the prison, whom they were asking, and Jesus he gave up to their will.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Levant)
All Luke Sites (Levant) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 25,961 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Luke 23:25 powerfully narrates the pivotal moment when Pontius Pilate, succumbing to the relentless demands of the crowd and the Jewish religious leaders, released Barabbas—a man imprisoned for sedition and murder—while simultaneously delivering the innocent Jesus to be crucified according to their will. This verse encapsulates a profound miscarriage of justice, highlighting human depravity, political expediency, and the sovereign unfolding of God's redemptive plan through the substitutionary sacrifice of His Son.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse serves as the tragic climax of Pilate's repeated attempts to exonerate Jesus and release Him. Preceding Luke 23:25, Pilate had declared Jesus innocent three times (Luke 23:4, Luke 23:14, Luke 23:22), even proposing a lesser punishment. He offered the crowd a choice between Jesus and Barabbas, hoping they would choose Jesus in accordance with the Passover custom. However, the chief priests and scribes incited the crowd to demand Barabbas's release and Jesus' crucifixion (Luke 23:18-23). This verse marks Pilate's ultimate capitulation, directly leading to Jesus' journey to Golgotha and His crucifixion, which is detailed immediately afterward in Luke 23:26-33.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Luke 23 unfold during the Passover festival in Jerusalem, a time of heightened religious and political tension. It was a customary practice for the Roman governor to release a prisoner at Passover, a tradition likely initiated by the Romans to appease the Jewish populace and maintain peace. Pontius Pilate, the Roman prefect of Judea (26-36 AD), was known for his harsh rule and political insecurity. He was wary of any disturbance that might lead to a report to Caesar, which could jeopardize his position (John 19:12). The Jewish religious leaders, driven by envy and a perceived threat to their authority, skillfully manipulated the crowd, leveraging the volatile atmosphere of the festival to achieve their desired outcome. Barabbas, described as a rebel and murderer, represented a type of nationalistic hero to some, having engaged in insurrection against Roman rule—a stark contrast to Jesus, who preached a spiritual kingdom.
  • Key Themes: Luke 23:25 is saturated with several profound themes. First, it underscores profound injustice and human depravity, as an innocent man is condemned while a violent criminal is set free, revealing the corrupting power of mob rule and political expediency. Second, it highlights human rejection of God's Messiah, demonstrating humanity's preference for an earthly, violent deliverer over the spiritual King who offered true salvation (John 1:11). Third, it exposes Pilate's moral cowardice and failure of leadership, as he prioritizes political stability over justice, despite his repeated declarations of Jesus' innocence. Finally, and most significantly, this event, while a testament to human sin, simultaneously illustrates divine sovereignty and the fulfillment of prophecy, as God orchestrates these events to bring about the atoning sacrifice of Christ, perfectly aligning with His eternal plan for redemption (Acts 2:23).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • released (Greek, apolýō', G630): This verb signifies "to free fully," "to dismiss," or "to pardon." In this context, it describes Pilate's act of setting Barabbas completely at liberty. The choice of this word emphasizes the stark contrast between Barabbas's full liberation and Jesus' subsequent condemnation, highlighting the judicial decision to acquit one and condemn the other.
  • sedition (Greek, stásis', G4714): This term denotes "a standing" or "uprising," specifically referring to a popular insurrection, rebellion, or controversy. It clearly identifies Barabbas as a political insurgent involved in an organized revolt against the Roman authorities. This detail underscores the gravity of Barabbas's crimes and contrasts sharply with Jesus' peaceful, non-political claims of kingship.
  • delivered (Greek, paradídōmi', G3860): This powerful verb means "to surrender," "to yield up," "to entrust," or "to betray." It is a significant term in the New Testament, often used for Judas's betrayal of Jesus. Here, it describes Pilate's act of handing Jesus over to the will of the crowd, abandoning his judicial responsibility and effectively surrendering Jesus to His enemies for execution. It conveys a sense of abandonment and betrayal, even from a figure of authority.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And he released unto them him that for sedition and murder was cast into prison, whom they had desired": This clause details Pilate's first action: the release of Barabbas. It specifies Barabbas's egregious crimes—"sedition and murder"—indicating he was a dangerous criminal involved in political rebellion and bloodshed. The phrase "whom they had desired" underscores the crowd's active and fervent choice, highlighting their preference for a violent rebel over the innocent Messiah, a choice driven by the incitement of the religious leaders.
  • "but he delivered Jesus to their will": This second clause presents the tragic counterpoint to Barabbas's release. The conjunction "but" emphasizes the stark contrast. Pilate, despite his previous declarations of Jesus' innocence, capitulates to the crowd's demands. To "deliver Jesus to their will" means Pilate surrendered Jesus to their malicious intent and desire for His crucifixion, effectively washing his hands of responsibility and allowing the crowd's unrighteous will to prevail over justice and truth.

Literary Devices

Luke 23:25 masterfully employs several literary devices to heighten the dramatic and theological impact of the scene. Irony is profoundly evident, as the innocent Son of God is condemned while a notorious criminal, guilty of serious offenses, is set free. This reversal of justice is a central ironic twist. Contrast is also a dominant feature, starkly juxtaposing Jesus, the peaceful and innocent claimant to a spiritual kingdom, with Barabbas, the violent rebel and murderer. This contrast highlights the crowd's misguided values and Pilate's moral compromise. Furthermore, the narrative uses Foreshadowing and Typology, where Barabbas's release in place of Jesus serves as a powerful prefigurement of the substitutionary atonement. Jesus, the sinless one, takes the place of the guilty, illustrating the core principle of vicarious sacrifice for sin. The concise and direct language also contributes to the pathos of the moment, conveying the immense tragedy and injustice.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Luke 23:25 stands as a profound theological statement on God's sovereign plan amidst human sin and injustice. The release of Barabbas and the condemnation of Jesus, though a horrific act of human depravity and political cowardice, was paradoxically part of God's predetermined will for the salvation of humanity. This moment vividly illustrates the principle of substitutionary atonement: the innocent taking the place of the guilty. Barabbas, representing humanity in its rebellion and sin, is set free because Jesus, the sinless Lamb of God, is delivered up to suffer the penalty for all. This divine exchange underscores the depth of God's love and His commitment to redeem a fallen world, even through the ultimate act of injustice against His Son. It reveals that even the darkest moments of human history are woven into the tapestry of God's overarching redemptive purpose.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Luke 23:25 serves as a poignant mirror for contemporary believers, challenging us to examine our own values and choices in a world often swayed by popular opinion and political expediency. It compels us to consider whether we, like the crowd, might be tempted to choose worldly solutions or popular narratives over the truth of God's Word and the path of Christ. This verse reminds us that true justice often runs counter to the prevailing currents of society, and standing for what is right may require courage in the face of immense pressure. It also offers profound comfort, demonstrating that even in the most egregious acts of injustice, God's sovereign plan for redemption is at work. Our faith is not in human systems or leaders, but in a God whose purposes prevail even through suffering. We are called to embody Christ's spirit of self-sacrifice and to champion justice, while simultaneously trusting in the ultimate triumph of God's will.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might we, consciously or unconsciously, choose "Barabbas" (worldly solutions, popular opinion, self-interest) over "Jesus" (God's truth, sacrificial love) in our daily lives?
  • How does Pilate's moral cowardice challenge us to stand firm for truth and justice, even when it is unpopular or costly?
  • What comfort and assurance can we draw from the fact that even this profound injustice was part of God's sovereign plan for salvation?

FAQ

Who was Barabbas and why was he chosen over Jesus?

Answer: Barabbas was a notorious prisoner, described in the Gospels as a rebel involved in an insurrection (sedition) and murder. He was likely a figure associated with violent resistance against Roman occupation, which might have made him a hero to some segments of the Jewish populace. During the Passover festival, it was customary for the Roman governor to release a prisoner chosen by the crowd. Pilate, hoping to release Jesus whom he found innocent, presented the crowd with a choice between Jesus and Barabbas. However, incited by the chief priests and elders (Matthew 27:20), the crowd vehemently demanded Barabbas's release, preferring a revolutionary who fought against Roman rule over Jesus, whose kingdom was not of this world (John 18:36).

What does 'delivered Jesus to their will' imply about Pilate's actions?

Answer: The phrase "delivered Jesus to their will" (Greek: paradídōmi Jesus to their thélēma) signifies Pilate's ultimate capitulation and abandonment of his judicial responsibility. Despite repeatedly declaring Jesus innocent (Luke 23:4, 14, 22), Pilate succumbed to the immense pressure from the crowd and the Jewish leaders, fearing a riot or a report to Caesar that could jeopardize his political standing (John 19:12). By "delivering" Jesus, Pilate effectively surrendered Him into the hands of those who sought His death, allowing their malicious desire to override justice and truth. This act highlights Pilate's moral cowardice and his failure to uphold the law, making him complicit in the unjust condemnation of Christ.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Luke 23:25, though depicting a moment of profound human injustice, stands as a powerful testament to the Christ-centered fulfillment of God's redemptive plan. The release of Barabbas, a guilty rebel and murderer, in exchange for Jesus, the innocent Son of God, is a vivid, tangible illustration of the substitutionary atonement that is at the heart of the Gospel. Barabbas, condemned by the law, is set free because Jesus, the sinless Lamb of God, willingly takes his place. This dramatic exchange foreshadows the ultimate sacrifice of Christ on the cross, where He, "who knew no sin, became sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him" (2 Corinthians 5:21). Jesus, the true King, was "delivered up for our trespasses and raised for our justification" (Romans 4:25), bearing the penalty that humanity justly deserved. His unjust condemnation by earthly powers was, in God's sovereign plan, the means by which humanity could be justly acquitted and reconciled to God, demonstrating that "God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us" (Romans 5:8). Thus, the release of Barabbas serves as a poignant type, pointing directly to the greater reality of Christ's vicarious suffering and His triumphant work on the cross, securing eternal freedom for all who believe.

Copy as

Commentary on Luke 23 verses 13–25

We have here the blessed Jesus run down by the mob, and hurried to the cross in the storm of a popular noise and tumult, raised by the malice and artifice of the chief priests, as agents for the prince of the power of the air.

I. Pilate solemnly protests that he believes he has done nothing worthy of death or of bonds. And, if he did believe so, he ought immediately to have discharged him, and not only so, but to have protected him from the fury of the priests and rabble, and to have bound his prosecutors to their good behaviour for their insolent conduct. But, being himself a bad man, he had no kindness for Christ, and, having made himself otherwise obnoxious, was afraid of displeasing either the emperor or the people; and therefore, for want of integrity, he called together the chief priests, and rulers, and people (whom he should have dispersed, as a riotous and seditious assembly, and forbid them to come near him), and will hear what they have to say, to whom he should have turned a deaf ear, for he plainly saw what spirit actuated them (Luk 23:14): "You have brought," saith he, "this man to me, and, because I have a respect for you, I have examined him before you, and have heard all you have to allege against him, and I can make nothing of it: I find no fault in him; you cannot prove the things whereof you accuse him."

II. He appeals to Herod concerning him (Luk 23:15): "I sent you to him, who is supposed to have known more of him than I have done, and he has sent him back, not convicted of any thing, nor under any mark of his displeasure; in his opinion, his crimes are not capital. He has laughed at him as a weak man, but has not stigmatized him as a dangerous man." He thought Bedlam a fitter place for him than Tyburn.

III. He proposes to release him, if they will but consent to it. He ought to have done it without asking leave of them, Fiat justitia, ruat coelum - Let justice have its course, though the heavens should be desolated. But the fear of man brings many into this snare, that, whereas justice should take place, though heaven and earth come together, they will do an unjust thing, against their consciences, rather than pull an old house about their ears. Pilate declares him innocent, and therefore has a mind to release him; yet, to please the people, 1. He will release him under the notion of a malefactor, because of necessity he must release one (Luk 23:17); so that whereas he ought to have been released by an act of justice, and thanks to nobody, he would have him released by an act of grace, and not be beholden to the people for it. 2. He will chastise him, and release him. If no fault be to be found in him, why should he be chastised? There is as much injustice in scourging as in crucifying an innocent man; nor would it be justified by pretending that this would satisfy the clamours of the people, and make him the object of their pity who was not to be the object of their envy. We must not do evil that good may come.

IV. The people choose rather to have Barabbas released, a wretched fellow, that had nothing to recommend him to their favour but the daringness of his crimes. He was imprisoned for a sedition made in the city, and for murder (of all crimes among men the least pardonable), yet this was the criminal that was preferred before Christ: Away with this man, and release unto us Barabbas, Luk 23:18, Luk 23:19. And no wonder that such a man is the favourite and darling of such a mob, he that was really seditious, rather than he that was really loyal and falsely accused of sedition.

V. When Pilate urged the second time that Christ should be released, they cried out, Crucify him, crucify him, Luk 23:20, Luk 23:21. They not only will have him die, but will have him die so great a death; nothing less will serve but he must be crucified: Crucify him, crucify him.

VI. When Pilate the third time reasoned with them, to show them the unreasonableness and injustice of it, they were the more peremptory and outrageous (Luk 23:22): "Why? What evil hath he done? Name his crime. I have found no cause of death, and you cannot say what cause of death you have found in him; and therefore, if you will but speak the word, I will chastise him and let him go." But popular fury, the more it is complimented, the more furious it grows; they were instant with loud voices, with great noises or outcries, not requesting, but requiring, that he might be crucified; as if they had as much right, at the feast, to demand the crucifying of one that was innocent as the release of one that was guilty.

VII. Pilate's yielding, at length, to their importunity. The voice of the people and of the chief priests prevailed, and were too hard for Pilate, and overruled him to go contrary to his convictions and inclinations. He had not courage to go against so strong a stream, but gave sentence that it should be as they required, Luk 23:24. Here is judgment turned away backward, and justice standing afar off, for fear of popular fury. Truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter, Isa 59:14. Judgment was looked for, but behold oppression; righteousness, but behold a cry, Isa 5:7. This is repeated in Luk 23:25, with the aggravating circumstance of the release of Barabbas: He released unto them him that for sedition and murder was cast into prison, who hereby would be hardened in his wickedness, and do the more mischief, because him they had desired, being altogether such a one as themselves; but he delivered Jesus to their will, and he could not deal more barbarously with him than to deliver him to their will, who hated him with a perfect hatred, and whose tender mercies were cruelty.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 13–25. Public domain.
Copy as
TertullianAD 220
Against Marcion Book IV
Then Barabbas, the most abandoned criminal, is released, as if he were the innocent man; while the most righteous Christ is delivered to be put to death, as if he were the murderer. Moreover two malefactors are crucified around Him, in order that He might be reckoned amongst the transgressors.
Origen of AlexandriaAD 253
HOMILIES ON LEVITICUS 10.2.2
The word of the Lord is rich, and according to the opinion of Solomon, "it must be written on the heart" not once but also twice and "three times." Let us to the best of our ability also now attempt to add something to what was said long ago. Let us show how "as a type of things to come" this one male goat was sacrificed to the Lord as an offering and the other one was sent away "living." Hear in the Gospels what Pilate said to the priests and the Jewish people: "Which of these two do you want me to send out to you: Jesus, who is called the Christ, or Barabbas?" Then all the people cried out to release Barabbas and to hand Jesus over to be killed. Look, you have a male goat who was sent "living into the wilderness." He carried with him the sins of the people who cried out and said, "Crucify, crucify!" The first is a male goat sent "living into the wilderness." The second is the male goat that was offered to God as an offering to atone for sins. Christ made a true atonement for those who believe in him.
Origen of AlexandriaAD 253
AGAINST CELSUS 8.42
Celsus goes on to say that "those who killed Jesus suffered nothing for a long a time afterwards." We must inform him and all who are prone to learn the truth. The Jewish people called for the crucifixion of Jesus with shouts of "Crucify him, crucify him!" They preferred to set free the robber who had been thrown into prison for sedition and murder. They wanted Jesus, who had been delivered through envy, to be crucified. The city where all these things happened was attacked shortly after this. After a long siege, it was totally overthrown and destroyed. God judged the inhabitants of that place unworthy of living the life of citizens together. Although it may seem incredible to say, God spared this people in delivering them to their enemies. He saw that they were incurably against any improvement and were daily sinking deeper and deeper into evil. All this happened to them because the blood of Jesus was shed at their instigation and on their land. The land was no longer able to bear those who were guilty of so fearful a crime against Jesus.
Cyril of JerusalemAD 386
Catechetical Lecture 13:3
Many have been crucified throughout the world, but the demons are not afraid of any of these. These people died because of their own sins, but Christ died for the sin of others. He “did not sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth.” It was not Peter, who could be suspected of partiality, who said this, but Isaiah, who, although not present in the flesh, in spirit foresaw the Lord’s coming in the flesh. Why do I bring only the prophet as a witness? Take the witness of Pilate himself. He passed judgment on him, by saying, “I find no guilt in this man.” When he delivered him over and washed his hands, he said, “I am innocent of the blood of this just man.” The robber is another witness to Jesus’ innocence. He is the first man to enter paradise. He rebuked his friend and said, “We are receiving what our deeds deserved, but this man has done nothing wrong, because you and I were present at his judgment.”
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Here Pilate, who as a judge acquits Christ, is made the minister of His crucifixion. He is sent to Herod, sent back to Pilate, as it follows, Nor yet Herod, for I sent you to him, and behold nothing worthy of death is done unto him. They both refuse to pronounce Him guilty, yet for fear's sake, Pilate gratifies the cruel desires of the Jews.

Not unreasonably do they seek the pardon of a murderer, who were themselves demanding the death of the innocent. Such are the laws of iniquity, that what innocence hates, guilt loves. And here the interpretation of the name affords a figurative resemblance, for Barabbas is in Latin, the son of a father. Those then to whom it is said, Ye are of your father the Devil, are represented as about to prefer to the true Son of God the son of their father, that is, Antichrist.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
EXPOSITION OF THE GOSPEL OF LUKE 10.101-2
Similarly, I think that this is a prototype of all judgments that they would condemn those whom they believed to be innocent. However, it is evident that the Gentiles are more tolerant than the Jews, as Pilate's association with them demonstrates, and they are more persuaded by divine works. But what about those who crucified the Lord of majesty? It is not without reason that murderers seek absolution, as they sought the destruction of the innocent. Such unjust laws have the quality of hating innocence and loving crime. However, in the interpretation of the name, it gives the appearance of a figure; for Barabbas is translated to mean 'son of the father' in Latin: therefore, those to whom it is said, 'You are of your father the devil,' are shown to prefer the son of their father, Antichrist, over the true Son of God.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
EXPOSITION OF THE GOSPEL OF LUKE 10.100
He is sent to Herod, sent back to Pilate. And although neither of them pronounce him guilty, they still comply with the desires of someone else's cruelty. Indeed, Pilate washed his hands, but he did not wash away his deeds; for a judge ought not to yield to envy or fear, so as to deliver the blood of an innocent person. His wife warned him: grace shone in the darkness; divinity was evident; yet she did not temper the sacrilegious sentence in this way.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
For they thought they could add this, namely, that Jesus was worse than a robber, and so wicked, that neither for mercy's sake, or by the privilege of the feast, ought He to be let free.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 152
They brought the holy and just One to Pilate. They spoke violent and unrestrained words against him and poured out falsely invented accusations. They persisted in the ferocity with which they accused him. Pilate then ruled that it should be as they desired, although he had publicly said, “I find no wickedness in this man.” It says, “They cried out, ‘Away with him, crucify him!’ ” The Lord had rebuked this unmerciful and unlawful cry by the voice of the prophet Isaiah. It is written, “The vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah are his pleasant planting; and he looked for justice, but behold, bloodshed; for righteousness, but behold, a cry!” In another place, he said of them, “Woe to them, for they have strayed from me! Destruction to them, for they have rebelled against me! I would redeem them, but they speak lies against me.” It is written again, “Their princes shall fall by the sword, because of the rudeness of their tongue.”
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Perish then those writings, which, composed so long a time after Christ, convict not the accused of magical arts against Pilate, but the writers themselves of treachery and lying against Christ.

As if he said, I will subject Him to all the scourgings and mockings you desire, but do not thirst after the innocent blood. It follows, For of necessity he must release one unto them, &c. an obligation not imposed by a decree of the imperial law, but binding by the annual custom of the nation, whom in such things he was glad to please.

Even to this day their request still clings to the Jews. For since when they had the choice given to them, they chose a robber for Jesus, a murderer for a Saviour; rightly lost they both life and salvation, and became subject to such robberies and seditions among themselves as to forfeit both their country and kingdom.

With the worst kind of death, that is, crucifixion, they long to murder the innocent. For they who hung on the cross, with their hands and feet fixed by nails to the wood, suffered a prolonged death, that their agony might not quickly cease; but the death of the cross was chosen by our Lord, as that which having overcome the Devil, He was about to place as a trophy on the brows of the faithful.

This chastisement wherewith Pilate sought to satisfy the people, lest their rage should go even so far as to crucify Jesus, John's words bear testimony that he not only threatened but performed together with mockings and scourgings. But when they saw all their charges which they brought against the Lord baffled by Pilate's diligent questioning, they resort at last to prayers only; entreating that He might be crucified.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Wherefore by the testimony of two men, Jesus is declared innocent, but the Jews His accusers brought forward no witness whom they could believe. See then how truth triumphs. Jesus is silent, and His enemies witness for Him; the Jews make loud cries, and not one of them corroborates their clamour.

Pilate therefore lenient and easy, yet wanting in firmness for the truth, because afraid of being accused, adds, I will therefore chastise him and release him.

For the Romans permitted the Jews to live according to their own laws and customs. And it was a natural custom of the Jews to seek pardon of the prince for those who were condemned, as they asked Jonathan of Saul. And hence it is now added, with respect to their petition, And they cried all at once, Away with this man, and release unto us Barabbas, &c. (1 Sam. 14:45.)

Thus it came to pass, the once holy nation rages to slay, the Gentile Pilate forbids slaughter; as it follows, Pilate therefore spoke again unto them, but they cried out, Crucify, &c.

Three times did Pilate acquit Christ, for it follows, And he said unto them the third time, Why, what evil hath he done? I will chastise him, and let him go.

They cry out the third time against Christ, that by this third voice, they may approve the murder to be their own, which by their entreaties they extorted; for it follows, And Pilate gave sentence that it should be as they required. And he released him that for sedition and murder was cast into prison, but delivered Jesus to their will.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Luke 23:25 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.