Lamentations 4:11
“God's Judgment Accomplished”Lamentations 4:11–16
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- כִּלָּהki·Lahhe has completedH3615V-Piel-Perf-3msVerb Piel Perfect 3rd Singular Masculine
- יְהוָהYah·wehYahwehH3068N-properNoun Proper Title
- אֶת'et[obj.]H853DirObjMParticle Object Indicator
- חֲמָתוֹcha·ma·Tohis rageH2534N-fsc ¦ 3msNoun Singular Feminine Construct with suffixחֲמָתrageוֹhis
- שָׁפַךְsha·Fakhhe has poured outH8210V-Qal-Perf-3msVerb Qal Perfect 3rd Singular Masculine
- חֲרוֹןcha·Ron[the] burning ofH2740N-mscNoun Singular Masculine Construct
- אַפּוֹ'a·Pohis angerH639N-msc ¦ 3msNoun Singular Masculine Construct with suffixאַפּangerוֹhis
- וַיַּצֶּתvai·ya·tzetand he has kindledH3341Conj-w ¦ V-Hiphil-ConsecImperf-3msVerb Hiphil Consecutive Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculineוַandיַּצֶּתhe has kindled
- אֵשׁ'esha fireH784N-csNoun Singular common gender Absolute
- בְּצִיּוֹןbe·tzi·Yonin ZionH6726Prep-b ¦ N-properNoun Proper LocationבְּinצִיּוֹןZion
- וַתֹּאכַלva·To·khaland it has consumedH398Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-ConsecImperf-3fsVerb Qal Consecutive Imperfect 3rd Singular Feminineוַandתֹּאכַלit has consumed
- יְסוֹדֹתֶיהָye·so·do·Tei·haits foundationsH3247N-fpc ¦ 3fsNoun Plural Feminine Construct with suffixיְסוֹדֹתֶיfoundationsהָits
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Lamentations 4:1–12. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
The elegy in this chapter begins with a lamentation of the very sad and doleful change which the judgments of God had made in Jerusalem. The city that was formerly as gold, as the most fine gold, so rich and splendid, the perfection of beauty and the joy of the whole earth, has become dim, and is changed, has lost its lustre, lost its value, is not what it was; it has become dross. Alas! what an alteration is here!
I.The temple was laid waste, which was the glory of Jerusalem and its protection.
it is given up into the hands of the enemy. And some understand the gold spoken of (Lamentations 4:1) to be the gold of the temple, the fine gold with which it was overlaid (1 Kings 6:22); when the temple was burned the gold of it was smoked and sullied, as if it had been of little value. it was thrown among the rubbish; it was changed, converted to common uses and made nothing of. The stones of the sanctuary, which were curiously wrought, were thrown down by the Chaldeans, when they demolished it, or were brought down by the force of the fire, and were poured out, and thrown about in the top of every street; they lay mingled without distinction among the common ruins. When the God of the sanctuary was by sin provoked to withdraw no wonder that the stones of the sanctuary were thus profaned.
II.The princes and priests, who were in a special manner the sons of Zion, were trampled upon and abused, Lamentations 4:2.
Both the house of God and the house of David were in Zion. The sons of both those houses were upon this account precious, that they were heirs to the privileges of those two covenants of priesthood and royalty. They were comparable to fine gold. Israel was more rich in them than in treasures of gold and silver. But now they are esteemed as earthen pitchers; they are broken as earthen pitchers, thrown by as vessels in which there is no pleasure. They have grown poor, and are brought into captivity, and thereby are rendered mean and despicable, and every one treads upon them and insults over them. Note, The contempt put upon God's people ought to be matter of lamentation to us.
III.Little children were starved for want of bread and water, Lamentations 4:3, Lamentations 4:4.
The nursing-mothers, having no meat for themselves, had no milk for the babes at their breast, so that, though in disposition they were really compassionate, yet in fact they seemed to be cruel, like the ostriches in the wilderness, that leave their eggs in the dust (Job 39:14, Job 39:15); having no food for their children, they were forced to neglect them and do what they could to forget them, because it was a pain to them to think of them when they had nothing for them; in this they were worse than the seals, or sea-monsters, or whales (as some render it), for they drew out the breast, and gave suck to their young, which the daughter of my people will not do. Children cannot shift for themselves as grown people can; and therefore it was the more painful to see the tongue of the sucking-child cleave to the roof of his mouth for thirst, because there was not a drop of water to moisten it; and to hear the young children, that could but just speak, ask bread of their parents, who had none to give them, no, nor any friend that could supply them. As doleful as our thoughts are of this case, so thankful should our thoughts be of the great plenty we enjoy, and the food convenient we have for ourselves and for our children, and for those of our own house.
IV.Persons of good rank were reduced to extreme poverty, Lamentations 4:5.
Those who were well-born and well bred, and had been accustomed to the best, both for food and clothing, who had fed delicately, had every thing that was curious and nice (they call it eating well, whereas those only eat well who eat to the glory of God), and fared sumptuously every day; they had not only been advanced to the scarlet, but from their beginning were brought up in scarlet, and were never acquainted with any thing mean or ordinary. They were brought up upon scarlet (so the word is); their foot-cloths, and the carpets they walked on, were scarlet, yet these, being stripped of all by the war, are desolate in the streets, have not a house to put their head in, nor a bed to lie on, nor clothes to cover them, nor fire to warm them. They embrace dunghills; on them they were glad to lie to get a little rest, and perhaps raked in the dunghills for something to eat, as the prodigal son who would fain have filled his belly with the husks. Note, Those who live in the greatest pomp and plenty know not what straits they may be reduced to before they die; as sometimes the needy are raised out of the dunghill. Those who were full have hired out themselves for bread, 1 Samuel 2:5. It is therefore the wisdom of those who have abundance not to use themselves too nicely, for then hardships, when they come, will be doubly hard, Deuteronomy 28:56.
V.Persons who were eminent for dignity, nay, perhaps for sanctity, shared with others in the common calamity, Lamentations 4:7, Lamentations 4:8.
Her Nazarites are extremely charged. Some understand it only of her honourable ones, the young gentlemen, who were very clean, and neat, and well-dressed, washed and perfumed; but I see not why we may not understand it of those devout people among them who separated themselves to the Lord by the Nazarites' vow, Num. 6. 2. That there were such among them in the most degenerate times appears from Amos 2:11, I raised up of your young men for Nazarites. These Nazarites, though they were not to cut their hair, yet by reason of their temperate diet, their frequent washings, and especially the pleasure they had in devoting themselves to God and conversing with him, which made their faces to shine as Moses's, were purer than snow and whiter than milk; drinking no wine nor strong drink, they had a more healthful complexion and cheerful countenance than those who regaled themselves daily with the blood of the grape, as Daniel and his fellows with pulse and water. Or it may denote the great respect and veneration which all good people had for them; though perhaps to the eye they had no form nor comeliness, yet, being separated to the Lord, they were valued as if they had been more ruddy than rubies and their polishing had been of sapphire. But now their visage is marred (as is said of Christ, Isaiah 52:14); it is blacker than a coal; they look miserably, partly through hunger and partly through grief and perplexity. They are not known in the streets; those who respected them now take no notice of them, and those who had been intimately acquainted with them now scarcely knew them, their countenance was so altered by the miseries that attended the long siege. Their skin cleaves to their bones, their flesh being quite consumed and wasted away; it is withered; it has become like a stick, as dry and hard as a piece of wood. Note, It is a thing to be much lamented that even those who are separated to God are yet, when desolating judgments are abroad, often involved with others in the common calamity.
VI.Jerusalem came down slowly, and died a lingering death; for the famine contributed more to her destruction than any other judgment whatsoever. Upon this account the destruction of Jerusalem was greater than that of Sodom (Lamentations 4:6), for that was overthrown in a moment; one shower of fire and brimstone dispatched it; no hand staid on her; she did not endure any long siege, as Jerusalem has done; she fell immediately into the hands of the Lord, who strikes home at a blow, and did not fall into the hands of man, who, being weak, is long in doing execution, Judges 8:21. Jerusalem is kept many months upon the rack, in pain and misery, and dies by inches, dies so as to feel herself die. And, when the iniquity of Jerusalem is more aggravated than that of Sodom, no wonder that the punishment of it is so. Sodom never had the means of grace the Jerusalem had, the oracles of God and his prophets, and therefore the condemnation of Jerusalem will be more intolerable than that of Sodom, Matthew 11:23, Matthew 11:24. The extremity of the famine is here set forth by two frightful instances of it: - 1. The tedious deaths that it was the cause of (Lamentations 4:9); many were slain with hunger, were famished to death, their stores being spent, and the public stores so nearly spent that they could not have any relief out of them. They were stricken through, for want of the fruits of the field; those who were starved were as sure to die as if they had been stabbed and stricken through; only their case was much more miserable. Those who are slain with the sword are soon put out of their pain; in a moment they go down to the grave, Job 21:13. They have not the terror of seeing death make its advances towards them, and scarcely feel it when the blow is given; it is but one sharp struggle, and the work is done. And, if we be ready for another world, we need not be afraid of a short passage to it; the quicker the better. But those who die by famine pine away; hunger preys upon their spirits and wastes them gradually; nay, and it frets their spirits, and fills them with vexation, and is as great a torture to the mind as to the body. There are bands in their death, Psalm 73:4. 2. The barbarous murders that it was the occasion of (Lamentations 4:10): The hands of the pitiful women have first slain and then sodden their own children. This was lamented before (Lamentations 2:20); and it was a thing to be greatly lamented that any should be so wicked as to do it and that they should be brought to such extremities as to be tempted to it. But this horrid effect of long sieges had been threatened in general (Leviticus 26:29, Deuteronomy 28:53), and particularly against Jerusalem in the siege of the Chaldeans, Jeremiah 19:9; Ezekiel 5:10. The case was sad enough that they had not wherewithal to feed their children and make meat for them (Lamentations 4:4), but much worse that they could find in their hearts to feed upon their children and make meat of them. I know not whether to make it an instance of the power of necessity or of the power of iniquity; but, as the Gentile idolaters were justly given up to vile affections (Romans 1:26), so these Jewish idolaters, and the women particularly, who had made cakes to the queen of heaven and taught their children to do so too, were stripped of natural affection and that to their own children. Being thus left to dishonour their own nature was a righteous judgment upon them for the dishonour they had done to God.
VII.Jerusalem comes down utterly and wonderfully.
1.The destruction of Jerusalem is a complete destruction (Lamentations 4:11): The Lord has accomplished his fury; he has made thorough work of it, has executed all that he purposed in wrath against Jerusalem, and has remitted no part of the sentence. He has poured out the full vials of his fierce anger, poured them out to the bottom, even the dregs of them. He has kindled a fire in Zion, which has not only consumed the houses, and levelled them with the ground, but, beyond what other fires do, has devoured the foundations thereof, as if they were to be no more built upon.
2.It is an amazing destruction, Lamentations 4:12. It was a surprise to the kings of the earth, who are acquainted with, and inquisitive about, the state of their neighbours; nay, it was so to all the inhabitants of the world who knew Jerusalem, or had ever heard or read of it; they could not have believed that the adversary and enemy would ever enter into the gates of Jerusalem; for,
(1.)They knew that Jerusalem was strongly fortified, not only by walls and bulwarks, but by the numbers and strength of its inhabitants; the strong hold of Zion was thought to be impregnable.
(2.)They knew that it was the city of the great King, where the Lord of the whole earth had in a more peculiar manner his residence; it was the holy city, and therefore they thought that it was so much under the divine protection that it would be in vain for any of its enemies to make an attack upon it.
(3.)They knew that many an attempt made upon it had been baffled, witness that of Sennacherib. They were therefore amazed when they heard of the Chaldeans making themselves masters of it, and concluded that it was certainly by an immediate hand of God that Jerusalem was given up to them; it was by a commission from him that the enemy broke through and entered the gates of Jerusalem.
Historical interpretation
Historical reception
1 surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
Here is bewailed the captivity, and destruction of the city, (Jerusalem). So, first is considered the destruction itself, second,'the wonder from this fact. As said in Verse 12: "The kings of the earth did not believe, or any of the inhabitants of the world, that foe or enemy could enter the gates of Jerusalem."
Thirdly, is assigned the reason for such destruction. As said in Verse 13: "This was for the sins of her prophets and the iniquities of her priests, who shed in the midst of her the blood of the righteous." That is, leading toward the punishment: "the Lord gave full vent to his wrath." (Verse 11). And: "he poured out his hot anger", due to a determination for a punishment. For, the city, (Jerusalem) was "burnt" in fire which consumed its foundations." That is, evensoever by force, or even up to the very foundations each house was destroyed. As said in Deuteronomy 32:22: "For a fire is kindled by my anger, and it burns to the depths of Sheol."
Continue studying Lamentations 4:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The LORD himself brought his fury to its end on Jerusalem, pouring out his fierce anger and lighting a fire in Zion that ate the city down to its foundations.
“The LORD hath accomplished his fury;”
The covenant name stands first. The fury (chêmâh, heat or rage) has been brought to its end (kâlâh), and the fall is the LORD’s act through Babylon.
“he hath poured out his fierce anger,”
Anger pictured as a liquid poured out (shâphak), with chârôwn, a burning of anger, joined to ʼaph, the nostril and so anger.
“and hath kindled a fire in Zion,”
The LORD sets the fire (yâtsath, ʼêsh) on the holy hill of Tsîyôwn, where the temple stood.
“and it hath devoured the foundations thereof.”
The fire eats (ʼâkal) even the base (yᵉçôwd) of the city, a picture of complete ruin.
Passage studyLamentations 4:11–16
The LORD Pours Out His Fury on Zion
Summary
Lamentations 4 mourns Jerusalem after the Babylonian siege, setting the city’s former glory beside its starving children and humbled nobles. In these six verses the poet names who did this and why. The LORD himself has brought his fury to its end, poured out his fierce anger and lit a fire in Zion that has eaten the city’s foundations. Kings and peoples everywhere had held Jerusalem to be beyond capture, and they could hardly believe an enemy had come in at its gates. The reason lay inside the walls. The prophets and priests had shed the blood of the righteous, and now those same leaders stumble through the streets like blind men, so stained with blood that people shout at them, “Depart ye; it is unclean,” and the nations give them nowhere to stay. The LORD’s anger has scattered them. The passage shows a holy God who keeps his word in judgment as surely as in blessing, and the book around it shows that the same God is faithful and merciful to his people.
The LORD has accomplished his fury
Verse 11 gives the whole catastrophe one cause in its first words: “The LORD hath accomplished his fury.” The army of Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon took and destroyed the city and its temple in 586 BC, and the poet calls that army’s work the LORD’s own act. The name used is Yᵉhôvâh, the personal covenant name of God. So the judgment comes from the God who had bound himself to Israel, falling on a people who had broken that covenant, and it fulfils the curses he had set before them for disobedience in Deuteronomy 28.
The verse gathers one word for anger after another. “Fury” is chêmâh, heat or rage, a word that elsewhere can also mean poison. “Hath accomplished” is kâlâh, to end, finish or complete, so his fury has run on to its end. “He hath poured out” is shâphak, to pour out, spill or shed, and it pictures his anger poured over the city like a liquid. “His fierce anger” joins two words. Chârôwn is a burning of anger, anger kindled like a fire, and ʼaph is properly the nose or nostril, which came to mean anger from the hard breathing of someone who is angry.
God’s anger here is his just answer to long rebellion. For generations Judah had worshipped idols, oppressed the weak and broken faith with the covenant, while prophets like Jeremiah warned them again and again. Many had come to count Zion safe whatever they did, because God had promised David a lasting house and the temple stood on its hill. That confidence burned with the city. God’s holiness is unchanged under the new covenant, and the letter to the Hebrews says to the church, “For our God is a consuming fire” (Hebrews 12:29).
The fire that devoured the foundations
“And hath kindled a fire in Zion” uses yâtsath, to kindle or set on fire, and the one who sets the fire is the LORD. Fire, ʼêsh, often stands in Scripture for God’s judgment. Zion, Tsîyôwn, was the hill where the temple stood and where God’s presence dwelt among his people, and that very place is where his fire falls. Jeremiah records the actual burning of the temple and the city by the Babylonians (Jeremiah 52:13).
“It hath devoured the foundations thereof.” The verb ʼâkal is the ordinary word for eating, used figuratively for fire that devours or consumes. Foundations, yᵉçôwd, are the base a building stands on, and in that world a city’s foundations stood for its stability and permanence. A fire that eats even the foundations is a picture of ruin reaching the bottom of everything, and the poet uses it to say that the judgment was complete.
A fall the world thought impossible
Jerusalem stood on its hills behind strong walls, and it had been rescued before, most famously when the Assyrian king Sennacherib besieged it and the city was delivered (2 Kings 19). As the city where God’s temple stood, it was widely held to be under his protection and beyond the reach of any army. So verse 12 says that “the kings of the earth, and all the inhabitants of the world, would not have believed” that an enemy could come in at its gates. “All the inhabitants of the world” is a deliberate overstatement, and it shows how far and wide the shock was felt.
The verb behind “believed” is ʼâman. Its root sense is to support or foster, and Hebrew uses it for trusting something as firm and sure. The nations had been sure of the opposite. “The adversary” is tsar, from a root meaning to cramp or make narrow. It most often means an adversary, one who presses in on others, and it can also mean distress. Set beside “the enemy”, it stresses how hostile the invaders were, and here both words mean the Babylonian forces.
The gates of a city were its defence and the centre of its trade and public life. When an enemy came in at the gates, the city’s strength was broken and it had lost the right to rule itself. Jerusalem, Yᵉrûwshâlaim, was the city of David and the place of the temple, and its name is commonly explained as “founded peaceful”. The Hebrew form is a dual, which is explained as an allusion to the city’s two main hills.
Jeremiah had foretold that Babylon would come and the land would be laid waste (Jeremiah 25:8–11). Centuries later Jesus wept over the same city as he foresaw its ruin (Luke 19:41–44).
Did God fail to protect Jerusalem?
Verse 12 tells how the fall looked from the human side, and verse 11 has already said what it was from God’s side, his righteous judgment. The prophets had warned Jerusalem many times that its sin and idolatry would bring destruction, and God’s protection of the city was tied to his people’s faithfulness. The fall carried out the covenant curses he had spoken (Deuteronomy 28:15–68), and he ruled over the Babylonian army that he used. God kept his word, and it was his people who had broken theirs.
The sins of her prophets and priests
Verse 13 opens with “For”, and gives the reason for everything before it. The KJV ends the verse with a comma, because the sentence runs on into verse 14.
The two words for wrongdoing are set side by side. “Sins” is chaṭṭâʼâh, an offence, and the same word is used for the sin offering that dealt with it. “Iniquities” is ʻâvôn, perversity or moral evil, and it can also mean the guilt and punishment that follow. Pairing “the sins of her prophets” with “the iniquities of her priests” lays the guilt on both groups of spiritual leaders together. The prophets had promised peace when God had spoken of sword and famine (Jeremiah 14:13–14), and the priests had broken God’s law and profaned his holy things (Ezekiel 22:26). Jeremiah says that both prophet and priest were profane (Jeremiah 23:11) and pronounces woe on the shepherds who scattered God’s flock (Jeremiah 23:1–2).
The worst charge comes last: they “have shed the blood of the just in the midst of her”. “Shed” is the same verb, shâphak, that verse 11 uses for the LORD pouring out his anger. The leaders poured out righteous blood, and the LORD poured out his anger on the city. Blood, dâm, is blood as that which causes death when it is shed, and in the plural it means bloodshed and bloodguilt. The victims are tsaddîyq, the just or righteous. The law forbade the shedding of innocent blood (Deuteronomy 19:10), among the things the LORD hates are “hands that shed innocent blood” (Proverbs 6:17), and Ezekiel charged Jerusalem with the bloodshed and injustice done inside it (Ezekiel 22:6–9). “In the midst of her” means this was done openly, in the heart of the city where God’s house stood.
Who were the just?
They were people who stayed faithful to God, spoke his truth and stood against the corruption of those in power. Jeremiah himself was let down into a muddy cistern to die (Jeremiah 38:6), and the prophet Uriah was persecuted for prophesying as Jeremiah did (Jeremiah 26:20–23). The men charged with guarding righteousness had turned on the righteous.
Blind men polluted with blood
Verse 14 goes on with the same leaders. “They have wandered as blind men in the streets.” The verb nûwaʻ means to waver or wander, moving without a steady course, and it comes back in verse 15 when the leaders flee. The streets, chûwts, are the outside places beyond the houses, so their stumbling was seen by everyone. The men who should have guided the nation could see neither their own sin nor the judgment coming. Isaiah calls Israel’s watchmen blind (Isaiah 56:10) and pictures the people groping for the wall like the blind (Isaiah 59:10), and Jesus calls the religious leaders of his day “blind guides” (Matthew 23:24).
“They have polluted themselves with blood.” The verb gâʼal means to soil, stain, defile or desecrate. The blood is the dâm of verse 13, the blood of the people they had wronged, and it marks them with the guilt of violence and injustice. Isaiah told Jerusalem, “your hands are full of blood” (Isaiah 1:15), Jeremiah charged Judah with the blood of the innocent poor (Jeremiah 2:34), and the law says that blood defiles the land (Numbers 35:33).
“So that men could not touch their garments.” Under the law of Moses, touching something unclean made a person unclean too (Leviticus 11:24–25, Leviticus 15:5). These men had become so defiled that people kept clear of even their clothes. The priests who were meant to keep the people clean were now the uncleanness everyone avoided, cut off from the community and from God.
Depart, it is unclean
Verse 15 gives the cry raised against them: “Depart ye; it is unclean; depart, depart, touch not.” The word “depart” stands three times in this verse, and the repetition makes the command urgent and final. The verb is çûwr, also spelled çûyr, meaning to turn aside, remove or withdraw. “Touch” is the same verb as in verse 14, so the cry puts into words what the people were already doing.
“Unclean” is ṭâmêʼ, foul in a religious sense, defiled. Under the law a person could become unclean through contact with a dead body, certain skin diseases or bodily discharges, and had to stay apart from the community and the sanctuary until purified. A leper had to cry “Unclean, unclean” as he went (Leviticus 13:45–46). Here others shout the leper’s cry at the city’s priests and prophets. The word that belonged to ritual impurity now names a moral defilement that made them abhorrent to God and to their own people.
Who cried “Depart”?
Verse 15 leaves the speakers unnamed. They are most likely the people left in Jerusalem, and possibly the foreign conquerors. The ones driven away are most likely the corrupt prophets, priests and leaders of verses 13 and 14, whose sins had brought the city down.
“They shall no more sojourn there”
“When they fled away and wandered, they said among the heathen, They shall no more sojourn there.” The heathen, gôwyim, are the foreign nations around Judah and among whom its people were exiled. “Sojourn” is gûwr, to turn aside from the road for a lodging, and so to stay somewhere as a guest. “No more” is yâçaph, to add or continue, used here as “any more”. The saying among the nations may mean that the fugitives could find no place even to stay as guests, or that they would never again settle in their own land. On either reading they had become a people without a home, as the covenant had warned when it spoke of Israel scattered among the nations and finding no rest (Deuteronomy 28:64–65). Isaiah had said that their iniquities had separated them from their God (Isaiah 59:2), and Ezekiel says that Israel defiled the land by its ways (Ezekiel 36:17–18).
The anger of the LORD has divided them
Verse 16 brings the passage back to the LORD. Under “the anger of the LORD” stands pânîym, the word for face, so the Hebrew speaks of the LORD’s face as turned against them. “Hath divided” is châlaq, to divide, share out or allot, and it also has a second sense, to be smooth. Here it describes a people broken apart, split up and scattered among the nations, and a society that had come apart from within. God’s anger is righteous and deliberate, for “The LORD is slow to anger, and great in power, and will not at all acquit the wicked” (Nahum 1:3).
“He will no more regard them.” The verb nâbaṭ means to look or gaze, and from that to have regard for someone with favour and care. Joined with yâçaph, “no more”, it says that the LORD has stopped looking on them with that kindly care.
“They respected not the persons of the priests, they favoured not the elders.” To respect persons is literally to lift up the face, and the same word for face stands under “persons” as under “anger” earlier in the verse. “Favoured” is chânan, to bend or stoop in kindness to someone lower, to show favour. The priests led the nation’s worship and taught the law, and the elders were its community leaders, judges and counsellors. When neither was given honour, contempt had spread through spiritual and civil life alike, and the order God had given for the people’s good had broken down.
Does God abandon his people?
“He will no more regard them” describes a severe withdrawal of God’s favour and protection, a judgment under the covenant that came because of Judah’s long sin. It felt like abandonment to those who lived through it. God’s faithfulness to his promises carried his people through it, and the exile was a discipline meant to bring them to repentance and restoration. Through Jeremiah he promised that after seventy years in Babylon he would visit them, hear them when they sought him with all their heart, and bring them home (Jeremiah 29:10–14).
Christ and the judgment on Zion
The anger poured out on Jerusalem points to the cross, where God’s wrath against sin fell on his own Son. Jesus is the “Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), and Isaiah says that the LORD laid on his servant the iniquity of us all (Isaiah 53:4–6). Since we are justified by his blood, we “shall be saved from wrath through him” (Romans 5:9). John the Baptist promised that the one coming after him would baptize with the Holy Ghost and with fire (Matthew 3:11). The foundations of Zion burned, and God has laid another foundation that no fire can devour, for “other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 3:11).
Jerusalem’s gates were broken through, and Jesus says, “I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved” (John 10:9). Nothing can separate those who enter by him from the love of God (Romans 8:38–39). The world could hardly believe that Jerusalem would fall, and many later stumbled at the message of Christ crucified, which is the power and wisdom of God (1 Corinthians 1:23–25). The gates of the New Jerusalem are never shut (Revelation 21:25).
The religious leaders of Jesus’ own day shed the blood of the Just One in Jerusalem (Acts 3:14). His blood, “as of a lamb without blemish and without spot” (1 Peter 1:19), was poured out for sin and shed “for many for the remission of sins” (Matthew 26:28), and “without shedding of blood is no remission” (Hebrews 9:22). He is the Prophet who has made the Father known (John 1:18), the great High Priest who offered himself (Hebrews 4:14–16), the chief Shepherd (1 Peter 5:4) and the head over all things to the church (Ephesians 1:22–23).
Jesus warned of blind leaders of the blind (Matthew 15:14), and he came to give sight to the blind (John 9:39–41). Those who were stained with guilt are cleansed by his blood from all sin (1 John 1:7), because God “made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin” (2 Corinthians 5:21). The leaders of Zion were driven out as unclean, and Jesus “suffered without the gate” so that he might sanctify the people with his own blood (Hebrews 13:12). The exiles found nowhere to stay, and the Son of Man had nowhere to lay his head (Matthew 8:20), yet he makes those who trust him children of God and heirs with him (Romans 8:17). His promise to his people is, “lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world” (Matthew 28:20).
Judgment and mercy from the same God
These verses show who God is when his people persist in sin. He is holy, his warnings are true, and he holds his people, and their leaders most of all, to account. Neither a famous city, nor a temple, nor past blessing protected Jerusalem when its prophets and priests shed righteous blood. The passage also shows how far the ruin of a people can begin with the corruption of those who teach it.
Yet the book that holds this chapter also holds the confession, “It is of the LORD’s mercies that we are not consumed, because his compassions fail not. They are new every morning: great is thy faithfulness” (Lamentations 3:22–23). The God who judged Zion is the same God who promised to bring his people home, and who in Christ bore his own fierce anger so that all who trust in his Son are spared it. That is why we can read even this hard passage with hope.
Lamentations 4:11 This verse
“The LORD hath accomplished his fury;”
The covenant name stands first. The fury (chêmâh, heat or rage) has been brought to its end (kâlâh), and the fall is the LORD’s act through Babylon.
“he hath poured out his fierce anger,”
Anger pictured as a liquid poured out (shâphak), with chârôwn, a burning of anger, joined to ʼaph, the nostril and so anger.
“and hath kindled a fire in Zion,”
The LORD sets the fire (yâtsath, ʼêsh) on the holy hill of Tsîyôwn, where the temple stood.
“and it hath devoured the foundations thereof.”
The fire eats (ʼâkal) even the base (yᵉçôwd) of the city, a picture of complete ruin.
Lamentations 4:12
“The kings of the earth, and all the inhabitants of the world,”
Near neighbours and distant rulers alike, an overstatement that shows how widely Jerusalem was thought safe.
“would not have believed”
ʼâman, to hold something as firm and sure. They had been sure Jerusalem would stand.
“that the adversary and the enemy”
Two words for the Babylonian invaders. Tsar most often means an adversary, one who hems others in.
“should have entered into the gates of Jerusalem.”
Entering the gates means the city is taken. Yᵉrûwshâlaim, the city of David and of the temple, had been delivered in Sennacherib’s day.
Lamentations 4:13
“For the sins of her prophets,”
“For” gives the reason. Chaṭṭâʼâh is an offence, and the same word names the sin offering. The prophets promised peace that God had never spoken of.
“and the iniquities of her priests,”
ʻâvôn is perversity, along with its guilt and punishment. The priests broke God’s law and profaned his holy things.
“that have shed the blood of the just”
The leaders poured out (shâphak) the blood (dâm) of the righteous (tsaddîyq), people like Jeremiah and Uriah who spoke God’s truth.
“in the midst of her,”
Openly, in the heart of the holy city. The sentence runs on into verse 14.
Lamentations 4:14
“They have wandered as blind men in the streets,”
The leaders of verse 13 stumble about (nûwaʻ) in the public places (chûwts), unable to see their sin or the judgment.
“they have polluted themselves with blood,”
Gâʼal means to stain or defile. The guilt of the blood they shed clings to them.
“so that men could not touch their garments.”
By the law, touching the unclean made a person unclean, so people kept away from even their clothes.
Lamentations 4:15
“They cried unto them, Depart ye; it is unclean;”
The leper’s cry of “unclean” (ṭâmêʼ) is shouted at the priests and prophets, most likely by the people left in the city.
“depart, depart, touch not:”
Çûwr repeated, an urgent order to get away, with the same verb for touching as in verse 14.
“when they fled away and wandered,”
The same verb for wandering as in verse 14. The blind wanderers of the streets become fugitives.
“they said among the heathen, They shall no more sojourn there.”
Among the nations (gôwyim) it was said that they would stay as guests (gûwr) no longer (yâçaph), whether in those lands or back in their own.
Lamentations 4:16
“The anger of the LORD hath divided them;”
Literally the LORD’s face. Châlaq is to divide or allot, and here the people are split up and scattered.
“he will no more regard them:”
Nâbaṭ is to look, and so to regard with favour and care, and the LORD has withdrawn that kindly look.
“they respected not the persons of the priests,”
To respect persons is to lift up the face. The priests, who led worship and taught the law, were given no honour.
“they favoured not the elders.”
Chânan is to stoop in kindness. The elders, the community’s leaders and judges, were shown none.
Last revised