Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And when the man rose up to depart, he, and his concubine, and his servant, his father in law, the damsel's father, said unto him, Behold, now the day draweth toward evening, I pray you tarry all night: behold, the day groweth to an end, lodge here, that thine heart may be merry; and to morrow get you early on your way, that thou mayest go home.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And when the man H376 rose up H6965 to depart H3212, he, and his concubine H6370, and his servant H5288, his father in law H2859, the damsel's H5291 father H1, said H559 unto him, Behold, now the day H3117 draweth H7503 toward evening H6150, I pray you tarry all night H3885: behold, the day H3117 groweth to an end H2583, lodge H3885 here, that thine heart H3824 may be merry H3190; and to morrow H4279 get you early H7925 on your way H1870, that thou mayest go H1980 home H168.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
When the man got up to leave with his concubine and servant, his father-in-law, the girl's father, said to him, "Look, it's almost evening. Please stay the night - you see that it's getting late. Stay on, enjoy yourself, and tomorrow get going early on your way home."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
When the man got up to depart with his concubine and his servant, his father-in-law, the girl’s father, said to him, “Look, the day is drawing to a close. Please spend the night. See, the day is almost over. Spend the night here, that your heart may be merry. Then you can get up early tomorrow for your journey home.”
Ask
American Standard Version
And when the man rose up to depart, he, and his concubine, and his servant, his father-in-law, the damsel’s father, said unto him, Behold, now the day draweth toward evening, I pray you tarry all night: behold, the day groweth to an end, lodge here, that thy heart may be merry; and to-morrow get you early on your way, that thou mayest go home.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
When the man rose up to depart, he, and his concubine, and his servant, his father-in-law, the young lady’s father, said to him, “Behold, now the day draws toward evening, please stay all night: behold, the day grows to an end, lodge here, that your heart may be merry; and tomorrow go on your way early, that you may go home.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Afterwarde when the man arose to depart with his concubine and his seruant, his father in lawe, the yong womans father said vnto him, Beholde nowe, the day draweth towarde euen: I pray you, tary all night: beholde, the sunne goeth to rest: lodge here, that thine heart may be merie, and to morowe get you earely vpon your way, and goe to thy tent.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And the man riseth to go, he and his concubine, and his young man, and his father-in-law, father of the young woman, saith to him, `Lo, I pray thee, the day hath fallen toward evening, lodge all night, I pray thee; lo, the declining of the day! lodge here, and let thine heart be glad--and ye have risen early to-morrow for your journey, and thou hast gone to thy tent.'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Sins of the Benjaminites
Sins of the Benjaminites View full PDF
Judges and Enemies Overview
Judges and Enemies Overview View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 7,034 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Judges 19:9 captures a pivotal moment of extended hospitality that, with tragic irony, precipitates a descent into profound darkness and depravity. It details the father-in-law's persistent and earnest plea for the Levite, his concubine, and his servant to prolong their stay for yet another night, citing the practical concerns of the approaching evening and the promise of comfort and merriment. This repeated delay, rooted in ancient Near Eastern customs of guest care, inadvertently sets the stage for the horrific events that unfold as the travelers are compelled to arrive in the morally corrupt Benjamite city of Gibeah after nightfall, exposing them to unimaginable evil.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Judges 19:9 serves as a critical hinge within one of the most disturbing and morally bleak narratives in the Old Testament, spanning Judges 19-21. This segment functions as a grim appendix to the book of Judges, powerfully illustrating the depths of Israel's moral and spiritual depravity during a time when "there was no king in Israel" and "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" Judges 17:6; Judges 21:25. The narrative begins with a Levite from Mount Ephraim traveling to Bethlehem in Judah to retrieve his concubine, who had previously left him. Her father had already extended overwhelming, almost excessive, hospitality, persuading them to stay for several days. Judges 19:9 marks the third instance where the Levite attempts to depart, only to be convinced by the father-in-law's earnest insistence, citing the dangers and discomfort of traveling as "the day draweth toward evening." This protracted stay, while appearing benevolent, ironically ensures they travel and arrive in the Benjamite city of Gibeah after dark, exposing them to the severe dangers of a society that had utterly forsaken covenant faithfulness and basic human decency. The narrative's placement at the end of Judges serves as a stark commentary on the consequences of spiritual anarchy, leading directly to a devastating civil war among the tribes of Israel.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period of the Judges (roughly 1400-1050 BC) was characterized by a cyclical pattern of apostasy, oppression, repentance, and deliverance, but also by a pervasive lack of central authority and a gradual erosion of moral standards. Hospitality in the ancient Near East was not merely a social custom but a sacred duty, offering protection and provision to travelers. To refuse hospitality, or to harm a guest, was considered a grave offense, often punishable by death. The father-in-law's actions in Judges 19:9 reflect this deep-seated cultural value, as he repeatedly urges his son-in-law to stay for comfort and safety. However, this well-intentioned, albeit excessive, hospitality stands in stark contrast to the shocking and egregious violation of hospitality that the Levite and his concubine later encounter in Gibeah Judges 19:15-28. The narrative highlights the breakdown of societal norms and the tribal system, particularly within the tribe of Benjamin, whose actions in Gibeah demonstrate a profound moral corruption that even other Israelite tribes found intolerable, ultimately leading to a brutal inter-tribal war Judges 20.

  • Key Themes: This verse, and the broader narrative it introduces, contributes to several significant themes within the book of Judges and the Old Testament. First, it powerfully illustrates the Perversion of Hospitality, contrasting the father-in-law's excessive but well-meaning care with the horrific abuse of the Levite and his concubine in Gibeah. This contrast underscores the deep moral decay in Israel, where even a foundational societal virtue could be utterly violated. Second, the repeated emphasis on the "day draweth toward evening" functions as Foreshadowing of Spiritual and Moral Darkness. The setting sun is not merely a temporal marker but symbolizes the deepening spiritual night that has fallen upon Israel due to their abandonment of God's law. The delay, intended for comfort, ironically leads them into a night of profound peril, highlighting how seemingly small decisions can have catastrophic consequences when discernment is lacking. Finally, the entire episode serves as a stark commentary on the Moral Decline and Anarchy of Israel. The events in Gibeah, culminating in civil war, are presented as a tragic outcome of a time when "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" Judges 21:25, a phrase repeated to emphasize the absence of divine authority and the resulting societal chaos. The father-in-law's excessive hospitality, while not inherently evil, inadvertently contributes to the circumstances that reveal the deep depravity present in the land, underscoring the dangers of human autonomy apart from God's guiding hand.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Depart (Hebrew, yâlak', H3212): This primitive root means "to walk" or "to go," and in this context, specifically "to depart" or "to set out on a journey." The Levite's repeated attempts to "rise up to depart" (vv. 8, 9, 10) highlight his intention to resume his journey homeward, emphasizing the tension between his desire to leave and the father-in-law's persistent pleas for him to stay. This word underscores the active decision to move on, which is repeatedly thwarted.
  • Tarry (Hebrew, lûwn', H3885): This root means "to stop (usually over night)," or "to lodge." Its repeated use by the father-in-law (vv. 9, 10) underscores his persistent desire for the Levite and his entourage to remain for the night. It is not merely a suggestion but a strong plea for them to halt their journey and find rest, emphasizing comfort and safety. This word becomes tragically ironic given the outcome of their delayed departure and the terror that awaits them.
  • Merry (Hebrew, yâṭab', H3190): This root means "to be (causative) make well," and figuratively, "to be (make) happy" or "successful." In the idiom "that thine heart may be merry" (literally, "that your heart may be good"), it describes enjoying oneself, often in the context of feasting, drinking, and fellowship. Its inclusion here reveals the father-in-law's genuine desire for his guest's comfort and enjoyment, even to the point of delaying their necessary journey. It paints a picture of convivial hospitality, which starkly contrasts with the terror that awaits the travelers.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And when the man rose up to depart, he, and his concubine, and his servant,": This clause establishes the Levite's clear intention to leave, marking the third attempt to depart from the father-in-law's house. It indicates a decision made by the Levite and his small entourage to resume their journey homeward, setting up the immediate conflict with the father-in-law's wishes and highlighting the Levite's agency in the decision-making process, even if he ultimately capitulates.
  • "his father in law, the damsel's father, said unto him,": This identifies the speaker as the father-in-law, who has already demonstrated excessive hospitality. His identity as "the damsel's father" reminds the reader of the familial connection and the context of the concubine's return, adding a layer of personal appeal and emotional leverage to his words.
  • "Behold, now the day draweth toward evening, I pray you tarry all night:": The father-in-law's first argument is based on the practical concern of the approaching darkness, which made travel dangerous and uncomfortable in ancient times. His plea to "tarry all night" is a direct invitation to delay their journey for safety and rest, framed as a request rather than a command, yet carrying significant persuasive weight due to the cultural expectations of hospitality.
  • "behold, the day groweth to an end, lodge here, that thine heart may be merry;": This reiterates the lateness of the hour, emphasizing the finality of the day's light and the increasing peril of travel. The added phrase "that thine heart may be merry" reveals his desire for the Levite's continued enjoyment and comfort, suggesting more feasting and fellowship. This highlights the father-in-law's focus on immediate pleasure and comfort over the urgency of the journey, subtly underscoring a lack of foresight regarding the potential dangers of delay.
  • "and to morrow get you early on your way, that thou mayest go home.": This is the father-in-law's promise and justification for the delay. He assures the Levite that an early start the next day will ensure a safe and timely arrival home. This promise, however, becomes tragically ironic, as the delay leads directly to their arrival in Gibeah at the worst possible time, preventing them from reaching their true "home" safely and setting in motion the horrific events that follow.

Literary Devices

Judges 19:9 is rich with Foreshadowing, subtly hinting at the impending doom. The repeated emphasis on "the day draweth toward evening" and "the day groweth to an end" is not merely a temporal marker but symbolizes the deepening moral and spiritual darkness that is about to engulf the travelers and the nation of Israel. The father-in-law's insistence on delaying the journey, intended for comfort and merriment, creates a profound sense of Irony. What appears to be an act of benevolent hospitality ultimately leads them into a situation of extreme danger and depravity, highlighting how well-meaning human intentions can inadvertently pave the way for disaster when not tempered with divine wisdom. Furthermore, the Repetition of the Levite's attempts to depart (vv. 8, 9, 10) juxtaposed with the father-in-law's persistent pleas to stay, builds narrative tension. This structural repetition underscores the father-in-law's stubbornness and the Levite's eventual capitulation, which proves to be a fatal decision. The entire scene operates as a microcosm of the book's larger message: a nation doing what is right in its own eyes, leading to a descent into chaos and moral decay.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Judges 19:9, within its larger narrative, serves as a stark reminder of the complex interplay between human decisions, divine providence, and the consequences of moral decline. While the father-in-law's hospitality was culturally appropriate and seemingly well-intentioned, the repeated delay it caused had catastrophic consequences, illustrating that even good intentions, when lacking discernment or when overriding a sense of urgency, can lead to dire outcomes. The passage underscores the biblical principle that "There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death" Proverbs 14:12. It highlights the dangers of complacency and the critical need for spiritual discernment in navigating a world where moral boundaries are blurred. The narrative's emphasis on the encroaching darkness, both literal and metaphorical, points to the pervasive spiritual blindness of Israel during the Judges period, where the absence of a righteous king led to widespread moral anarchy. This serves as a powerful theological commentary on the human condition apart from divine guidance and the tragic results when individuals and societies prioritize personal comfort or convenience over adherence to God's standards.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Judges 19:9, though a seemingly minor detail in a horrific narrative, offers profound lessons for contemporary believers. It challenges us to consider the potential consequences of our decisions, particularly when we are tempted to prioritize immediate comfort or social politeness over wisdom and discernment. The father-in-law's well-meaning but ultimately disastrous insistence on delay serves as a cautionary tale: even actions rooted in good intentions can have unforeseen and tragic ripple effects, especially when entering morally compromised environments or periods of spiritual vulnerability. This passage urges us to cultivate spiritual discernment, to be sensitive to the "drawing toward evening" in our own lives—those moments when delays or compromises might expose us or others to spiritual peril. It calls us to resist the temptation to "lodge here" for merriment when God's call or wisdom dictates that we "get you early on your way" towards righteousness and safety. Ultimately, the broader context of Judges 19-21, initiated by this delay, compels us to examine our own moral compass and commitment to God's unchanging standards, resisting the pervasive cultural pressure to simply do "what is right in our own eyes" when societal norms deviate from biblical truth.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life might I be delaying a necessary "journey" or decision out of a desire for comfort or avoidance of perceived difficulty?
  • How can I cultivate greater spiritual discernment to recognize the "drawing toward evening" in my own circumstances, and avoid situations that could lead to spiritual compromise?
  • What societal norms or personal habits, though seemingly harmless, might be inadvertently setting the stage for moral or spiritual vulnerability in my life or community?
  • How does the contrast between the father-in-law's hospitality and the lack thereof in Gibeah challenge my understanding and practice of Christian hospitality today?

FAQ

Was the father-in-law responsible for the horrific events that followed the delay?

Answer: While the father-in-law's persistent hospitality and insistence on delay directly contributed to the Levite and his concubine arriving in Gibeah after dark, making them vulnerable, he is not directly responsible for the subsequent atrocities. The responsibility for the horrific acts lies squarely with the wicked men of Gibeah and, by extension, the moral depravity of the Benjamite tribe and the broader societal breakdown in Israel. The father-in-law's actions, though well-intentioned, highlight how even seemingly benign decisions can have unforeseen and tragic consequences, especially when one is about to enter a morally corrupt environment. The narrative's primary focus is on the extreme wickedness of Gibeah and the resulting civil war, illustrating the depths of Israel's depravity when "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" Judges 21:25.

What does this passage teach us about the concept of hospitality in the Bible?

Answer: Judges 19:9, read in conjunction with the subsequent events, offers a complex lesson on hospitality. The father-in-law's actions exemplify the ancient Near Eastern cultural ideal of hospitality, which was a sacred duty to protect and provide for guests. His repeated pleas to "tarry all night" reflect genuine concern for their safety and comfort. However, this initial, well-intentioned hospitality stands in stark contrast to the shocking lack of hospitality and extreme violence the Levite and his concubine later face in Gibeah Judges 19:15-28. This contrast underscores the moral decay of Israel during the period of the Judges. Biblically, true hospitality is a virtue commanded by God Romans 12:13; Hebrews 13:2, but this passage cautions that even good intentions can have unintended negative consequences if not tempered with discernment and wisdom, especially when navigating a morally compromised world.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The dark narrative initiated by Judges 19:9, with its themes of moral decay, perverted hospitality, and the absence of a righteous king, powerfully underscores humanity's desperate need for a Savior. The chaos and anarchy described, where "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" Judges 21:25, perfectly sets the stage for the coming of Christ, the true King who brings order out of chaos and establishes perfect righteousness. The literal "drawing toward evening" in the verse foreshadows the spiritual darkness that enveloped humanity due to sin, from which only Jesus, the "light of the world" John 8:12, can deliver us. While the father-in-law's hospitality, however excessive, was meant to protect, it ultimately failed to shield his guests from depravity. In stark contrast, Christ offers ultimate refuge and protection, inviting all who are weary and burdened to find rest in Him Matthew 11:28. The horrific abuse of the concubine, a victim of human depravity, points to the ultimate sacrifice of the innocent Lamb of God, Jesus Christ, who willingly laid down His life to atone for the sins of a fallen world John 1:29; Philippians 2:8. Judges 19:9, therefore, is a poignant reminder of the brokenness of a world without its true King, amplifying the glory and necessity of Christ's redemptive work.

Copy as

Commentary on Judges 19 verses 1–15

The domestic affairs of this Levite would not have been related thus largely but to make way for the following story of the injuries done him, in which the whole nation interested themselves. Bishop Hall's first remark upon this story is, That there is no complain of a public ordered state but there is a Levite at one end of it, either as an agent or as a patient. In Micah's idolatry a Levite was active; in the wickedness of Gibeah a Levite was passive; no tribe shall sooner feel the want of government than that of Levi; and, in all the book of Judges, no mention is made of any of that tribe, but of these two. This Levite was of Mount Ephraim, Jdg 19:1. He married a wife of Bethlehem-Judah. She is called his concubine, because she was not endowed, for perhaps he had nothing to endow her with, being himself a sojourner and not settled; but it does not appear that he had any other wife, and the margin calls her a wife, a concubine, Jdg 19:1. She came from the same city that Micah's Levite came from, as if Bethlehem-Judah owed a double ill turn to Mount Ephraim, for she was as bad for a Levite's wife as the other for a Levite.

I. This Levite's concubine played the whore and eloped from her husband, Jdg 19:2. The Chaldee reads it only that she carried herself insolently to him, or despised him, and, he being displeased at it, she went away from him, and (which was not fair) was received and entertained at her father's house. Had her husband turned her out of doors unjustly, her father ought to have pitied her affliction; but, when she treacherously departed from her husband to embrace the bosom of a stranger, her father ought not to have countenanced her sin. Perhaps she would not have violated her duty to her husband if she had not known too well where she should be kindly received. Children's ruin is often owing very much to parents' indulgence.

II. The Levite went himself to court her return. It was a sign there was no king, no judge, in Israel, else she would have been prosecuted and put to death as an adulteress; but, instead of that, she is addressed in the kindest manner by her injured husband, who takes a long journey on purpose to beseech her to be reconciled, Jdg 19:3. If he had put her away, it would have been a crime in him to return to her again, Jer 3:1. But, she having gone away, it was a virtue in him to forgive the offence, and, though the party wronged, to make the first motion to her to be friends again. It is part of the character of the wisdom from above that it is gentle and easy to be entreated. He spoke friendly to her, or comfortably (for so the Hebrew phrase of speaking to the heart commonly signifies), which intimates that she was in sorrow, penitent fore what she had done amiss, which probably he heard of when he came to fetch her back. Thus God promises concerning adulterous Israel (Hos 2:14), I will bring her into the wilderness, and speak comfortably to her.

III. Her father made him very welcome, and, by his extraordinary kindness to him, endeavoured to atone for the countenance he had given his daughter in withdrawing from him, and to confirm him in his disposition to be reconciled to her. 1. He entertains him kindly, rejoices to see him (Jer 3:3), treats him generously for three days, Jdg 19:4. And the Levite, to show that he was perfectly reconciled, accepted his kindness, and we do not find that he upbraided him or his daughter with what had been amiss, but was as easy and as pleasant as at his first wedding-feast. It becomes all, but especially Levites, to forgive as God does. Every thing among them gave a hopeful prospect of their living comfortably together for the future; but, could they have foreseen what befel them within one day or two, how would all their mirth have been embittered and turned into mourning! When the affairs of our families are in the best posture we ought to rejoice with trembling, because we know not what troubles one day may bring forth. We cannot foresee what evil is near us, but we ought to consider what may be, that we may not be secure, as if tomorrow must needs be as this day and much more abundant, Isa 56:12. 2. He is very earnest for his stay, as a further demonstration of his hearty welcome. The affection he had for him, and the pleasure he took in his company, proceeded, (1.) From a civil regard to him as his son-in-law and an ingrafted branch of his own house. Note, Love and duty are due to those to whom we are related by marriage as well as to those who are bone of our bone: and those that show kindness as this Levite did may expect to receive kindness as he did. And, (2.) From a pious respect to him as a Levite, a servant of God's house; if he was such a Levite as he should be (and nothing appears to the contrary) he is to be commended for courting his stay, finding his conversation profitable, and having opportunity to learn from him the good knowledge of the Lord, hoping also that the Lord will do him good because he has a Levite to be his son-in-law, and will bless him for his sake. [1.] He forces him to stay the fourth day, and this was kind; not knowing when they might be together again, he engages him to stay as long as he possibly could. The Levite, though nobly treated, was very urgent to be gone. A good man's heart is where his business is; for as a bird that wanders from her nest so is the man that wanders form his place. It is a sign a man has either little to do at home, or little heart to do what he has to do, when he can take pleasure in being long abroad where he has nothing to do. It is especially good to see a Levite willing to go home to his few sheep in the wilderness. Yet this Levite was overcome by importunity and kind persuasion to stay longer than he intended, Jdg 19:5-7. We ought to avoid the extreme of an over-easy yielding, to the neglect of our duty on the one hand, and that of moroseness and wilfulness, to the neglect of our friends and their kindness on the other hand. Our Saviour, after his resurrection, was prevailed upon to stay with his friends longer than he at first intimated to be his purpose, Luk 24:28, Luk 24:29. [2.] He forces him to stay till the afternoon of the fifth day, and this, as it proved, was unkind, Jdg 19:8, Jdg 19:9. He would by no means let him go before dinner, promises him he shall have dinner early, designing thereby, as he had done the day before, to detain him another night; but the Levite was intent on the house of the Lord at Shiloh (Jdg 19:18), and, being impatient to get thither, would stay no longer. Had they set out early, they might have reached some better lodging-place than that which they were now constrained to take up with, nay, they might have got to Shiloh. Note, Our friends' designed kindnesses often prove, in the event, real injuries; what is meant for our welfare becomes a trap. Who knows what is good for a man in this life? The Levite was unwise in setting out so late; he might have got home better if he had staid a night longer and taken the day before him.

IV. In his return home he was forced to lodge at Gibeah, a city in the tribe of Benjamin, afterwards called Gibeah of Saul, which lay on his road towards Shiloh and Mount Ephraim. When it drew towards night, and the shadows of the evening were stretched out, they began to think (as it behoves us to do when we observe the day of our life hastening towards a period) where they must lodge. When night came they could not pursue their journey. He that walketh in darkness knoweth not whither he goes. They could not but desire rest, for which the night was intended, as the day for labour. 1. The servant proposed that they should lodge in Jebus, afterwards Jerusalem, but as yet in the possession of Jebusites. "Come," said the servant, "let us lodge in this city of the Jebusites," Jdg 19:11. And, if they had done so, it is probable they would have had much better usage than they met with in Gibeah of Benjamin. Debauched and profligate Israelites are worse and much more dangerous than Canaanites themselves. But the master, as became one of God's tribe, would by no means quarter, no, not one night, in a city of strangers (Jdg 19:12), not because he questioned his safety among them, but he was not willing, if he could possibly avoid it, to have so much intimacy and familiarity with them as a night's lodging came to, nor to be so much beholden to them. By shunning this place he would witness against the wickedness of those that contracted friendship and familiarity with these devoted nations. Let Israelites, Levites especially, associate with Israelites, and not with the sons of the stranger. 2. Having passed by Jebus, which was about five or six miles from Bethlehem (the place whence they came), and not having daylight to bring them to Ramah, they stopped at Gibeah (Jdg 19:13-15); there they sat down in the street, nobody offering them a lodging. In these countries, at that time, there were no inns, or public-houses, in which, as with us, travellers might have entertainment for their money, but they carried entertainment along with them, as this Levite did (Jdg 19:19), and depended upon the courtesy and hospitality of the inhabitants for a lodging. Let us take occasion hence, when we are in journeys, to thank God for this, among other conveniences of travelling, that there are inns to entertain strangers, and in which they may be welcome and well accommodated for their money. Surely there is no country in the world wherein one may stay at home with more satisfaction, or go abroad with more comfort, than in our own nation. This traveller, though a Levite (and to those of that tribe God had particularly commanded his people to be kind upon all occasions), met with very cold entertainment at Gibeah: No man took them into his house. If they had any reason to think he was a Levite perhaps that made those ill-disposed people the more shy of him. There are those who will have this laid to their charge at the great day, I was a stranger and you took me not in.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–15. Public domain.
Copy as
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
On the Duties of the Clergy 3.19.111-12
How full of pitiful traits is this story! A man, it says, a Levite, had taken to himself a wife, who I suppose was called a concubine from the word concubitus. She some time afterwards, as is likely to happen, offended at certain things, returned to her father and was with him four months. Then her husband arose and went to the house of his father-in-law to reconcile himself with his wife, to win her back and take her home again. The woman ran to meet him and brought her husband into her father’s house.The maiden’s father rejoiced and went to meet him, and the man stayed with him three days, and they ate and rested. On the next day the Levite arose at daybreak but was detained by his father-in-law, that he might not so quickly lose the pleasure of his company. Again on the next and the third day the maiden’s father did not allow his son-in-law to start [his journey], until their joy and mutual regard was complete. But on the seventh day, when it was already drawing to a close, after a pleasant meal, having urged the approach of the coming night, so as to make him think he ought to sleep among friends rather than strangers, he was unable to keep him, and so let him go together with his daughter.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
LETTER 33
A Levite, more courageous than wealthy, lived in the region of Mount Ephrem, for his tribe was allotted a landed possession far removed in place of the right of inheritance. He took a wife from the tribe of Bethlehem of Judah. While they felt the first attraction of their love deeply and equally, he continued to burn with unbounded desire for his wife. Yet her ways were different. His passion for her intensified until he inwardly seethed with desire. Yet, because there was a difference in their ages, and because he felt—either because she seemed to love him less or due to the violence of his pain—that she didn’t consider him her equal, he used to criticize her. Frequently quarreling followed, and the offended wife gave back the keys of the house and went home.After the fourth month slipped by her husband, who was overwhelmed with love and had nothing else to hope for, went to her, trusting that the young girl’s heart would be softened on the advice of her parents. His father-in-law met him at the door and brought him into the house. He reconciled his daughter and, in order that he might send them away more joyous, kept them three days while he prepared a sort of nuptial banquet. Although the man wanted to depart, he kept him a fourth day, offering him excuses of civility, devising delays. In his desire to add a fifth day as well, he found new reasons for delaying them, while the husband, unwilling to thwart the father’s affection of its desire to keep his daughter, though he was at last promised an opportunity for setting forth, postponed it to midday so that they would start out well fortified with food. Even after dinner, the father wished to find some delay, saying that evening was now approaching. At last he acquiesced, though reluctantly, to the entreaties of his son-in-law.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Judges 19:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.