Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And he said unto his servant, Come, and let us draw near to one of these places to lodge all night, in Gibeah, or in Ramah.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And he said H559 unto his servant H5288, Come H3212, and let us draw near H7126 to one H259 of these places H4725 to lodge all night H3885, in Gibeah H1390, or in Ramah H7414.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
He said to his servant, "Let's go, and we'll get to one of those places; we'll stay in Giv'ah or Ramah."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
He continued, “Come, let us try to reach one of these towns to spend the night in Gibeah or Ramah.”
Ask
American Standard Version
And he said unto his servant, Come and let us draw near to one of these places; and we will lodge in Gibeah, or in Ramah.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He said to his servant, “Come and let us draw near to one of these places; and we will lodge in Gibeah, or in Ramah.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And he said vnto his seruant, Come, and let vs drawe neere to one of these places, that wee may lodge in Gibeah or in Ramah.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And he saith to his young man, `Come, and we draw near to one of the places, and have lodged in Gibeah, or in Ramah.'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Sins of the Benjaminites
Sins of the Benjaminites View full PDF
Judges and Enemies Overview
Judges and Enemies Overview View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 7,038 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Judges 19:13 marks a seemingly routine decision by a traveling Levite, accompanied by his concubine and servant, to seek overnight lodging, yet this choice tragically becomes the catalyst for one of the most horrifying and morally depraved narratives in the biblical canon. This verse, depicting the deliberation between Gibeah and Ramah as potential resting places after their journey from Bethlehem, unknowingly sets the stage for an abyss of societal breakdown, unspeakable violence, and the subsequent eruption of a devastating civil war that nearly annihilates an entire tribe of Israel.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Judges 19:13 is deeply embedded within the final, climactic narrative arc of the book of Judges (chapters 19-21), a section widely regarded as the darkest and most disturbing in the Old Testament. Following the Levite's journey from Bethlehem of Judah, where he had retrieved his concubine who had previously deserted him, this verse captures the immediate practical concern of finding overnight shelter. The preceding verses detail the Levite's prolonged stay with his father-in-law, highlighting a period of relative calm before the impending catastrophe. This seemingly ordinary quest for lodging serves as the dramatic hinge upon which the subsequent horrors of Gibeah and the ensuing tribal war against Benjamin will turn, underscoring how mundane choices can have catastrophic consequences within a morally bankrupt society.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The narrative unfolds in the turbulent era of the Judges, a period characterized by political decentralization and profound moral anarchy, famously summarized by the refrain, "in those days there was no king in Israel; every man did what was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25). Ancient Near Eastern culture placed immense value on hospitality, viewing the provision of shelter and sustenance to travelers as a sacred duty and a fundamental sign of communal well-being. The Levite's need for lodging after a day's journey from Bethlehem to the territory of Benjamin was a common predicament for travelers. Both Gibeah and Ramah were significant Benjaminite towns, strategically located along the main north-south route. The expectation would have been for any Israelite town to offer sanctuary, making the subsequent failure of Gibeah to uphold this fundamental societal and religious norm all the more shocking and indicative of profound moral decay.
  • Key Themes:
    • The Breakdown of Hospitality and Societal Norms: This verse immediately foregrounds the critical theme of hospitality, a cornerstone of ancient Israelite society and a recurring motif throughout the Old Testament. The Levite's search for a place to "lodge all night" highlights the vulnerability of travelers and the moral obligation of communities to provide safe haven. The tragic events that follow in Gibeah reveal a catastrophic failure of this sacred duty, exposing a society where basic human decency and divine commands regarding the care of strangers have been utterly abandoned, leading to unimaginable depravity, echoing the wickedness seen in Genesis 19.
    • Foreshadowing of Darkness and Depravity: Judges 19:13, with its seemingly innocuous choice of lodging, functions as a chilling foreshadowing device. The decision to enter Gibeah, rather than bypass it for Ramah, is presented as a practical consideration, yet it unknowingly seals the fate of the travelers and precipitates one of the most gruesome accounts in biblical literature. This verse is the calm before the storm, subtly hinting at the profound moral corruption that pervades this particular Benjaminite town, setting the stage for the horrific gang rape and murder of the concubine and the subsequent civil war that nearly annihilates the tribe of Benjamin in Judges 20.
    • Geographic and Tribal Significance: The mention of Gibeah and Ramah is geographically precise and thematically significant. Both were towns within the territory of Benjamin, a tribe that would later produce Israel's first king, Saul, whose own capital would be Gibeah (1 Samuel 10:26). The narrative in Judges 19 thus provides a grim and disturbing backdrop to the future history of this tribe, suggesting a deep-seated moral failing that predates the monarchy and perhaps even influences the later character of its leadership. This specific geographic choice underscores the pervasive nature of Israel's spiritual and moral decline during the period of the Judges.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • draw near (Hebrew, qârab', H7126): This verb signifies a deliberate approach or drawing close, often with the intent of interaction or engagement. It's not a casual passing by but a purposeful movement toward a destination for a specific purpose – in this case, seeking shelter. The Levite's command to his servant to "draw near" emphasizes the intentionality of their decision to seek refuge within one of these towns, highlighting their vulnerability and dependence on the hospitality of the inhabitants.
  • lodge (Hebrew, lûwn', H3885): Meaning "to stop (usually over night)," "to stay permanently," or "to abide." This term underscores the practical necessity of finding safe harbor for the duration of the darkness. In ancient times, traveling after sunset was perilous due to robbers, wild animals, and the lack of visibility. The urgency implied by "lodge all night" reflects the common concern for security and rest after a long day's journey, setting up the dramatic tension when this basic need for safety is tragically violated.
  • Gibeah (Hebrew, Gibʻâh', H1390): Meaning "the hill." While seemingly innocuous, the specific mention of Gibeah here is laden with profound ironic foreshadowing. This town, located in the territory of Benjamin, would later become the capital of King Saul (1 Samuel 10:26) and is often referred to as "Gibeah of Saul." In this narrative, however, it is presented as a place of extreme moral depravity, a stark contrast to the expected norms of Israelite society. Its name, "hill," ironically becomes a "hill of shame" due to the atrocities committed within its walls, symbolizing the depths of Israel's spiritual decline.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And he said unto his servant, Come, and let us draw near to one of these places": This opening phrase establishes the Levite's authority and initiative in the decision-making process. The imperative "Come" signals a direct command, indicating the urgency of their situation. The phrase "draw near to one of these places" signifies a deliberate, intentional approach to a specific settlement, highlighting the travelers' active search for shelter rather than a passive encounter, setting the stage for their fateful choice.
  • "to lodge all night,": This clause clarifies the immediate objective of their approach: to secure safe overnight accommodation. In the ancient world, night travel was fraught with dangers, making the need for secure lodging paramount. This simple statement of purpose underscores the basic human need for rest and safety, which, in the unfolding narrative, will be tragically and brutally denied, exposing the profound breakdown of societal norms and hospitality in Gibeah.
  • "in Gibeah, or in Ramah.": This final clause presents the two specific options for lodging, both towns within the tribal territory of Benjamin. The choice between Gibeah and Ramah, though seemingly arbitrary and practical at this moment, carries immense dramatic irony and foreshadowing. While Ramah is presented as an alternative, the Levite's ultimate decision to enter Gibeah proves to be a catastrophic one, as this town is revealed to be a hotbed of moral corruption and violence, leading directly to the horrific events that define Judges 19 and ignite a civil war.

Literary Devices

Judges 19:13 is rich with literary devices that amplify its dramatic impact and theological significance. The most prominent is Foreshadowing. The seemingly innocent choice between Gibeah and Ramah subtly hints at the impending horror, as the narrative immediately proceeds to depict the extreme depravity found in Gibeah. This mundane decision becomes a chilling precursor to the unspeakable violence that will unfold. Closely related is Irony. The Levite's decision to seek lodging in an Israelite town, expecting the customary hospitality, is met with an appalling lack of welcome and ultimately, horrific violence, making the very idea of "safety" in Gibeah deeply ironic. Furthermore, there is profound Geographic Symbolism. Gibeah, a town whose name means "hill," ironically becomes a symbol of the depths of Israel's moral and spiritual decline, a "hill of shame." Its later association with King Saul, Israel's first monarch, further imbues this location with symbolic weight, suggesting a foundational corruption within the very tribe from which Israel's initial leadership would emerge.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Judges 19:13, though brief, serves as a theological gateway into profound themes concerning human responsibility, societal decay, and the devastating consequences of moral abandonment. The Levite's seemingly simple decision to seek lodging underscores the ancient Israelite covenantal expectation of hospitality, a foundational virtue reflecting God's own welcoming nature towards His people and strangers alike. The subsequent narrative, triggered by this choice, tragically illustrates the complete breakdown of this divine command, revealing a society where the absence of a righteous king has led to a pervasive "every man did what was right in his own eyes" mentality. This verse thus highlights the critical importance of communal moral integrity and the dire spiritual and social repercussions when a people forsake God's laws and embrace self-serving depravity, ultimately pointing to humanity's inherent need for divine order and redemption.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Judges 19:13 serves as a sobering reminder that seemingly insignificant decisions can unleash unforeseen and devastating consequences. The Levite's choice of lodging, while practical, ultimately led to unimaginable horror, prompting us to consider the moral implications of our own daily choices and the environments we choose to inhabit or tolerate. This verse also compels us to reflect on the vital role of communal responsibility and the profound societal decay that occurs when basic standards of human decency, compassion, and divine law are abandoned. It challenges us to cultivate discernment, not merely to avoid physical danger, but to recognize and resist the spiritual and moral rot that can permeate communities and individual lives when God's truth is disregarded. We are called to be agents of light and hospitality in a world that often mirrors the darkness of Gibeah, actively upholding righteousness and extending genuine care to those around us, remembering that our actions, however small, contribute to the moral fabric of our society.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do seemingly small decisions in our lives often carry significant, unforeseen consequences, both positive and negative?
  • In what ways does our current society reflect the "every man did what was right in his own eyes" mentality seen in the book of Judges, and what are the potential dangers of such a mindset?
  • How can believers actively cultivate a spirit of genuine hospitality and moral integrity in their communities, counteracting the societal decay exemplified by Gibeah?

FAQ

Why did the Levite choose Gibeah over Jebus (Jerusalem)?

Answer: The narrative in Judges 19:11-12 explicitly states that the Levite chose not to lodge in Jebus (the pre-Israelite name for Jerusalem), even though it was a major city. His reasoning was that it was a city of "strangers" (Jebusites), not Israelites. This decision highlights a tribal and ethnic preference for lodging among his own people, even though the Jebusites might have offered hospitality. Ironically, his choice to seek refuge among fellow Israelites in Gibeah, a Benjaminite town, proved far more perilous than staying with the "strangers" in Jebus, underscoring the profound moral corruption within Israel itself during this period.

What is the significance of the choice between Gibeah and Ramah?

Answer: The choice between Gibeah and Ramah in Judges 19:13 is fraught with dramatic irony and symbolic weight. Both were Benjaminite towns, but the Levite's decision to enter Gibeah proved catastrophic. Ramah, meaning "height," was a priestly city and a place of prophetic activity (e.g., 1 Samuel 7:17). While it's not explicitly stated that Ramah would have been safer, the narrative's focus on Gibeah's depravity makes the choice a pivotal turning point. Gibeah, meaning "hill," later became the capital of Israel's first king, Saul, a Benjaminite (1 Samuel 10:26). The horrors committed in Gibeah in Judges 19 thus cast a long, dark shadow over the future of the Benjaminite tribe and its royal lineage, suggesting a deep-seated moral rot that would plague Israel's early monarchy.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The grim narrative initiated by Judges 19:13, with its shocking portrayal of human depravity and the complete breakdown of societal order, powerfully underscores Israel's desperate need for a righteous king. The repeated refrain, "in those days there was no king in Israel," finds its ultimate answer in Jesus Christ, the true and eternal King who perfectly embodies the justice, mercy, and order that Israel so desperately lacked. Unlike the failed hospitality of Gibeah, Christ offers ultimate refuge and genuine welcome to all who come to Him, declaring, "Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest" (Matthew 11:28). The shocking violence and moral anarchy of Judges 19 highlight the depth of human sin and the need for divine intervention, pointing forward to the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. Through His atoning sacrifice, Christ not only redeems humanity from its inherent depravity but also establishes a new community, the Church, where true hospitality, love, and righteousness are to be practiced, fulfilling the very virtues so tragically absent in Gibeah. He is the ultimate safe harbor, the King who brings order to chaos, and the One who transforms hearts of stone into hearts of flesh, offering a spiritual home far superior to any earthly lodging, a fulfillment of God's promise to dwell among His people (Revelation 21:3).

Copy as

Commentary on Judges 19 verses 1–15

The domestic affairs of this Levite would not have been related thus largely but to make way for the following story of the injuries done him, in which the whole nation interested themselves. Bishop Hall's first remark upon this story is, That there is no complain of a public ordered state but there is a Levite at one end of it, either as an agent or as a patient. In Micah's idolatry a Levite was active; in the wickedness of Gibeah a Levite was passive; no tribe shall sooner feel the want of government than that of Levi; and, in all the book of Judges, no mention is made of any of that tribe, but of these two. This Levite was of Mount Ephraim, Jdg 19:1. He married a wife of Bethlehem-Judah. She is called his concubine, because she was not endowed, for perhaps he had nothing to endow her with, being himself a sojourner and not settled; but it does not appear that he had any other wife, and the margin calls her a wife, a concubine, Jdg 19:1. She came from the same city that Micah's Levite came from, as if Bethlehem-Judah owed a double ill turn to Mount Ephraim, for she was as bad for a Levite's wife as the other for a Levite.

I. This Levite's concubine played the whore and eloped from her husband, Jdg 19:2. The Chaldee reads it only that she carried herself insolently to him, or despised him, and, he being displeased at it, she went away from him, and (which was not fair) was received and entertained at her father's house. Had her husband turned her out of doors unjustly, her father ought to have pitied her affliction; but, when she treacherously departed from her husband to embrace the bosom of a stranger, her father ought not to have countenanced her sin. Perhaps she would not have violated her duty to her husband if she had not known too well where she should be kindly received. Children's ruin is often owing very much to parents' indulgence.

II. The Levite went himself to court her return. It was a sign there was no king, no judge, in Israel, else she would have been prosecuted and put to death as an adulteress; but, instead of that, she is addressed in the kindest manner by her injured husband, who takes a long journey on purpose to beseech her to be reconciled, Jdg 19:3. If he had put her away, it would have been a crime in him to return to her again, Jer 3:1. But, she having gone away, it was a virtue in him to forgive the offence, and, though the party wronged, to make the first motion to her to be friends again. It is part of the character of the wisdom from above that it is gentle and easy to be entreated. He spoke friendly to her, or comfortably (for so the Hebrew phrase of speaking to the heart commonly signifies), which intimates that she was in sorrow, penitent fore what she had done amiss, which probably he heard of when he came to fetch her back. Thus God promises concerning adulterous Israel (Hos 2:14), I will bring her into the wilderness, and speak comfortably to her.

III. Her father made him very welcome, and, by his extraordinary kindness to him, endeavoured to atone for the countenance he had given his daughter in withdrawing from him, and to confirm him in his disposition to be reconciled to her. 1. He entertains him kindly, rejoices to see him (Jer 3:3), treats him generously for three days, Jdg 19:4. And the Levite, to show that he was perfectly reconciled, accepted his kindness, and we do not find that he upbraided him or his daughter with what had been amiss, but was as easy and as pleasant as at his first wedding-feast. It becomes all, but especially Levites, to forgive as God does. Every thing among them gave a hopeful prospect of their living comfortably together for the future; but, could they have foreseen what befel them within one day or two, how would all their mirth have been embittered and turned into mourning! When the affairs of our families are in the best posture we ought to rejoice with trembling, because we know not what troubles one day may bring forth. We cannot foresee what evil is near us, but we ought to consider what may be, that we may not be secure, as if tomorrow must needs be as this day and much more abundant, Isa 56:12. 2. He is very earnest for his stay, as a further demonstration of his hearty welcome. The affection he had for him, and the pleasure he took in his company, proceeded, (1.) From a civil regard to him as his son-in-law and an ingrafted branch of his own house. Note, Love and duty are due to those to whom we are related by marriage as well as to those who are bone of our bone: and those that show kindness as this Levite did may expect to receive kindness as he did. And, (2.) From a pious respect to him as a Levite, a servant of God's house; if he was such a Levite as he should be (and nothing appears to the contrary) he is to be commended for courting his stay, finding his conversation profitable, and having opportunity to learn from him the good knowledge of the Lord, hoping also that the Lord will do him good because he has a Levite to be his son-in-law, and will bless him for his sake. [1.] He forces him to stay the fourth day, and this was kind; not knowing when they might be together again, he engages him to stay as long as he possibly could. The Levite, though nobly treated, was very urgent to be gone. A good man's heart is where his business is; for as a bird that wanders from her nest so is the man that wanders form his place. It is a sign a man has either little to do at home, or little heart to do what he has to do, when he can take pleasure in being long abroad where he has nothing to do. It is especially good to see a Levite willing to go home to his few sheep in the wilderness. Yet this Levite was overcome by importunity and kind persuasion to stay longer than he intended, Jdg 19:5-7. We ought to avoid the extreme of an over-easy yielding, to the neglect of our duty on the one hand, and that of moroseness and wilfulness, to the neglect of our friends and their kindness on the other hand. Our Saviour, after his resurrection, was prevailed upon to stay with his friends longer than he at first intimated to be his purpose, Luk 24:28, Luk 24:29. [2.] He forces him to stay till the afternoon of the fifth day, and this, as it proved, was unkind, Jdg 19:8, Jdg 19:9. He would by no means let him go before dinner, promises him he shall have dinner early, designing thereby, as he had done the day before, to detain him another night; but the Levite was intent on the house of the Lord at Shiloh (Jdg 19:18), and, being impatient to get thither, would stay no longer. Had they set out early, they might have reached some better lodging-place than that which they were now constrained to take up with, nay, they might have got to Shiloh. Note, Our friends' designed kindnesses often prove, in the event, real injuries; what is meant for our welfare becomes a trap. Who knows what is good for a man in this life? The Levite was unwise in setting out so late; he might have got home better if he had staid a night longer and taken the day before him.

IV. In his return home he was forced to lodge at Gibeah, a city in the tribe of Benjamin, afterwards called Gibeah of Saul, which lay on his road towards Shiloh and Mount Ephraim. When it drew towards night, and the shadows of the evening were stretched out, they began to think (as it behoves us to do when we observe the day of our life hastening towards a period) where they must lodge. When night came they could not pursue their journey. He that walketh in darkness knoweth not whither he goes. They could not but desire rest, for which the night was intended, as the day for labour. 1. The servant proposed that they should lodge in Jebus, afterwards Jerusalem, but as yet in the possession of Jebusites. "Come," said the servant, "let us lodge in this city of the Jebusites," Jdg 19:11. And, if they had done so, it is probable they would have had much better usage than they met with in Gibeah of Benjamin. Debauched and profligate Israelites are worse and much more dangerous than Canaanites themselves. But the master, as became one of God's tribe, would by no means quarter, no, not one night, in a city of strangers (Jdg 19:12), not because he questioned his safety among them, but he was not willing, if he could possibly avoid it, to have so much intimacy and familiarity with them as a night's lodging came to, nor to be so much beholden to them. By shunning this place he would witness against the wickedness of those that contracted friendship and familiarity with these devoted nations. Let Israelites, Levites especially, associate with Israelites, and not with the sons of the stranger. 2. Having passed by Jebus, which was about five or six miles from Bethlehem (the place whence they came), and not having daylight to bring them to Ramah, they stopped at Gibeah (Jdg 19:13-15); there they sat down in the street, nobody offering them a lodging. In these countries, at that time, there were no inns, or public-houses, in which, as with us, travellers might have entertainment for their money, but they carried entertainment along with them, as this Levite did (Jdg 19:19), and depended upon the courtesy and hospitality of the inhabitants for a lodging. Let us take occasion hence, when we are in journeys, to thank God for this, among other conveniences of travelling, that there are inns to entertain strangers, and in which they may be welcome and well accommodated for their money. Surely there is no country in the world wherein one may stay at home with more satisfaction, or go abroad with more comfort, than in our own nation. This traveller, though a Levite (and to those of that tribe God had particularly commanded his people to be kind upon all occasions), met with very cold entertainment at Gibeah: No man took them into his house. If they had any reason to think he was a Levite perhaps that made those ill-disposed people the more shy of him. There are those who will have this laid to their charge at the great day, I was a stranger and you took me not in.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–15. Public domain.
Copy as
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
On the Duties of the Clergy 3.19.113
When some little progress was made, though night was threatening to come on, and they were close by the town of the Jebusites, on the slave’s request that his lord should turn aside there, he refused, because it was not a city of the children of Israel. He meant to get as far as Gibeah, which was inhabited by the people of the tribe of Benjamin. But when they arrived there was no one to receive them with hospitality, except a stranger of advanced age—when he had looked upon them he asked the Levite, “Where are you going and from where have you come?” On his answering that he was traveling and was making for Mount Ephraim and that there was no one to take him in, the old man offered him hospitality and prepared a meal.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
LETTER 33
He set out on his journey in happy spirits because he had recovered his dearly beloved wife. One servant was with him, and as day was already declining they sped on their way with swift steps. The woman rode on an ass; her husband felt no weariness, taking joy in his desire and lightening his journey with talk at times with the woman, at times with the slave. When at length they neared Jerusalem, about thirty stades away, a place inhabited then by Jebusites, the servant boy suggested that they turn into the city, especially since night makes even safe places suspect and one must guard against the uncertainties of darkness, and particularly since the inhabitants of this locality were not of the children of Israel. They should beware lest treachery be done with hostile design, for the night’s darkness is opportune enough for any tricksters to perpetrate evil. But his master did not care for the servant’s idea of seeking lodging among foreigners, since Gaba [Gibeah] and Rama, cities of Benjamin, were not far distant. His strong will overrode the servant’s suggestion, as though advice takes its value from one’s condition [of birth] rather than that through advice a lowly condition may be raised. The sun was now setting and he agreed reluctantly to go into the city [Gibeah], for he was overtaken by evening. The Gabanites lived there, unfriendly, harsh, unbearable people, who could stand anything but to receive people hospitably. Indeed, it would have been much more suitable had the Levite not sought hospitality in Gaba [Gibeah]. That his treatment be utterly offensive, he found on entering the city that there was no inn. And when he sat on the road imploring the mercy of these strangers, an old man from the fields happened to stumble on him, for evening had compelled him to leave his work in the fields at night. Seeing him, he asked where he was from and where he was going. He answered, “I came from Bethlehem of Judah, I am going to Mount Ephrem, and my wife is here with me. But I have learned that there is no one here to give hospitality and provide us a chance to rest.” He needed no food or drink for himself nor food for his flock, but they had been refused the hospitality of shelter. They had everything; only a bare lodging was needed. To this the old man kindly and calmly said, “Peace to you! Come in as my guest and fellow citizen, for I am also from the region of Mount Ephrem, and here is a lodging place; someone who lived here a long time laid its foundations.” Having received them into his home, he attentively and carefully provided for his guests and entertained them.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Judges 19:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.