Judges 18:17

Translation
King James Version
And the five men that went to spy out the land went up, and came in thither, and took the graven image, and the ephod, and the teraphim, and the molten image: and the priest stood in the entering of the gate with the six hundred men that were appointed with weapons of war.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the five H2568 men H582 that went H1980 to spy out H7270 the land H776 went up H5927, and came in H935 thither, and took H3947 the graven image H6459, and the ephod H646, and the teraphim H8655, and the molten image H4541: and the priest H3548 stood H5324 in the entering H6607 of the gate H8179 with the six H8337 hundred H3967 men H376 that were appointed H2296 with weapons H3627 of war H4421.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
while the five who had spied out the land went in and took the idol overlaid with silver, the vest and the household gods. The cohen had stayed with the 600 soldiers by the gate.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And the five men who had gone to spy out the land went inside and took the graven image, the ephod, the household idols, and the molten idol, while the priest stood at the entrance of the gate with the six hundred armed men.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the five men that went to spy out the land went up, and came in thither, and took the graven image, and the ephod, and the teraphim, and the molten image: and the priest stood by the entrance of the gate with the six hundred men girt with weapons of war.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The five men who went to spy out the land went up, and came in there, and took the engraved image, and the ephod, and the teraphim, and the molten image: and the priest stood by the entrance of the gate with the six hundred men girt with weapons of war.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then the fiue men that went to spie out the land, went in thither, and tooke the grauen image and the Ephod, and the Teraphim, and the molten image: and the Priest stoode in the entring of the gate with the sixe hundreth men, that were appointed with weapons of warre,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
yea, the five men, those going to traverse the land, go up--they have come in thither--they have taken the graven image, and the ephod, and the teraphim, and the molten image--and the priest is standing at the opening of the gate, and the six hundred men who are girded with weapons of war--
Ask
See also
Judges 18:14Judges 17:4Judges 17:5Judges 18:21 Samuel 6:21 Samuel 6:92 Kings 19:18
See on the biblical-era map
Micah
Micah View full PDF
Judges and Enemies Overview
Judges and Enemies Overview View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 7,011 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Judges 18:17 encapsulates a moment of profound spiritual and moral decay within ancient Israel, depicting the Danite tribe's audacious and pre-meditated theft of illicit cultic objects from Micah's private shrine. This act, undertaken with overwhelming force, signifies not only a blatant disregard for God's law against idolatry but also a pragmatic, self-serving approach to religion characteristic of the chaotic period of the Judges, where might often superseded divine command.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Judges 18:17 is a pivotal scene within the larger narrative of the Danite migration, which commences in Judges 18:1. The tribe of Dan, having failed to fully dispossess the Amorites from their divinely allotted inheritance in the south (Judges 1:34), dispatches five spies to scout new territory. Their journey leads them to the Ephraimite hills, where they encounter a Levite priest serving in the syncretistic household shrine of Micah (Judges 17:5). The spies, recognizing the priest from a previous encounter (Judges 18:3-5), return to their tribe with a report of the fertile land of Laish and a recommendation to seize Micah's religious artifacts. This verse marks their return, not to worship or seek divine guidance, but to execute a pre-meditated theft of Micah's religious artifacts, intending to establish their own religious center in their new territory. The formidable presence of the 600 armed Danite men outside (Judges 18:11-12) underscores the overwhelming force backing this act of coercion, ensuring no resistance from Micah or his household. The subsequent verses detail the Danites' successful theft and their persuasion of the Levite priest to join them (Judges 18:18-20).
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of Judges consistently portrays a period of profound instability, moral relativism, and spiritual apostasy in Israel, famously summarized by the refrain, "In those days there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25). This verse vividly illustrates that societal breakdown. Without a central religious or political authority to enforce the Mosaic Law, individual tribes and families often resorted to self-serving actions, even when those actions directly violated God's commands. The presence of a private shrine with a Levite priest, complete with forbidden images and legitimate cultic items, reflects the widespread syncretism where Yahweh worship was blended with pagan practices. The Danites' actions—theft, kidnapping, and the establishment of a new idolatrous cult—were not isolated incidents but symptomatic of a broader cultural malaise where "might made right," and divine commands were disregarded for pragmatic gain. The geographical setting, moving from the south to the far north (Laish/Dan), also highlights the fragmentation of Israel and the absence of national unity, further exacerbating the spiritual decline.
  • Key Themes: Judges 18:17 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Judges. Firstly, it exemplifies Rampant Idolatry and Syncretism. The explicit listing of the "graven image," "ephod," and "teraphim" reveals a blend of forbidden pagan practices and misused elements of legitimate Israelite worship, demonstrating how deeply idolatry had permeated Israelite society, even among those who claimed to serve Yahweh. The Danites, rather than destroying these idols as commanded by God (Deuteronomy 12:2-4), simply appropriate them for their own use, highlighting a profound Moral and Spiritual Decline. This act of theft and the subsequent kidnapping of the priest (Judges 18:19) vividly portrays the "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" mentality (Judges 21:25), where God's law was ignored. Finally, the Danites' actions reveal a Self-Serving and Pragmatic Religion. They desired a priest and religious artifacts not out of genuine devotion to Yahweh, but to legitimize their new settlement and ensure divine favor for their conquest, regardless of the objects' illicit origins, demonstrating a transactional rather than transformative faith.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • took (Hebrew, lâqach', H3947): This primitive root signifies "to take" in a wide variety of applications, including to seize, acquire, or carry away. In this context, it highlights the forceful and deliberate act of confiscation by the Danite spies. The use of this verb underscores the active, aggressive nature of their appropriation of Micah's cultic objects, rather than a passive or accidental acquisition.
  • graven image (Hebrew, peçel', H6459): Derived from a root meaning "to carve," this term refers specifically to a carved idol, typically made of wood or stone, often overlaid with metal. Its presence here signifies a direct violation of the second commandment, which explicitly prohibits the making of any carved image for worship (Exodus 20:4). The Danites' appropriation of such an object underscores their disregard for God's explicit prohibitions against idolatry.
  • teraphim (Hebrew, tᵉrâphîym', H8655): This plural noun refers to household idols, often small figurines, used for divination, protection, or as symbols of family ownership or inheritance rights (cf. Rachel stealing Laban's teraphim in Genesis 31:19). Their inclusion in Micah's shrine further highlights the pervasive syncretistic blend of pagan folk religion with corrupted Yahweh worship, demonstrating how deeply idolatry had permeated Israelite homes and religious practices.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the five men that went to spy out the land went up, [and] came in thither": This clause emphasizes the deliberate and premeditated nature of the Danites' action. These are the same spies who had previously evaluated the land and assessed Micah's shrine. Their "going up" and "coming in" signifies a forceful, uninvited entry, backed by the knowledge of their superior numbers. It highlights their audacious confidence in their ability to take what they desired, reflecting a complete disregard for Micah's property rights or the illicit nature of the objects themselves.
  • "[and] took the graven image, and the ephod, and the teraphim, and the molten image": This is the central action of the verse: the forceful seizure of the cultic objects. The explicit listing of each item underscores the comprehensive nature of the theft and the specific spiritual compromises present in Micah's shrine. The Danites are not destroying these idols, as commanded by the Law, but appropriating them for their own use, demonstrating their pragmatic, self-serving approach to religion rather than a commitment to pure Yahweh worship. This act directly contravenes God's commands regarding the destruction of idolatrous objects (Deuteronomy 7:5).
  • "and the priest stood in the entering of the gate with the six hundred men [that were] appointed with weapons of war": This final clause provides the crucial context of intimidation and overwhelming force. The priest's passive stance "in the entering of the gate" indicates his helplessness and the futility of resistance against the large, armed Danite contingent. The "six hundred men appointed with weapons of war" serve as a visible deterrent, ensuring the spies can complete their plundering unimpeded. It underscores the "might makes right" ethos prevalent in the Judges period, where physical power superseded divine law or moral rectitude, and even a "priest" was powerless against armed might.

Literary Devices

Judges 18:17 is rich with literary techniques that amplify its message of spiritual and moral decay. The most prominent is Irony: the Danites, a tribe of Israel, God's chosen people, are depicted not as conquering enemies of idolatry, but as thieves who steal idols to establish their own idolatrous worship. They are seeking a new home, but their foundation is built on theft and spiritual compromise, a stark contrast to the divine mandate for purity. The detailed enumeration of the cultic objects ("graven image," "ephod," "teraphim," "molten image") serves as powerful Symbolism, representing the pervasive syncretism and spiritual corruption that plagued Israel. These objects are not merely items but embody the nation's departure from exclusive devotion to Yahweh. The scene also employs Foreshadowing, as this act of establishing an idolatrous cult at Dan (Judges 18:30-31) sets the stage for the later apostasy of the northern kingdom, where Dan becomes a center of calf worship under Jeroboam (1 Kings 12:29-30), illustrating the long-term, devastating consequences of spiritual compromise.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Judges 18:17 serves as a chilling indictment of Israel's spiritual condition during the Judges period, illustrating the devastating consequences of abandoning God's covenant. The Danites' actions—theft and the appropriation of forbidden idols—are a direct affront to the Mosaic Law, particularly the foundational commandments against idolatry (Exodus 20:4-5) and the command to utterly destroy all pagan objects and places of worship (Deuteronomy 12:2-4). This passage highlights the danger of a self-serving, pragmatic religion that seeks to manipulate divine favor through illicit means rather than pursuing genuine obedience and exclusive devotion to Yahweh. It underscores the cyclical pattern of apostasy, oppression, and deliverance that defines the book of Judges, where the absence of a king and the prevalence of "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25) led to moral anarchy and profound spiritual decay, setting the stage for future national failures.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Judges 18:17 offers profound warnings for contemporary believers, confronting us with the insidious nature of spiritual compromise and the dangers of a faith that is more pragmatic than pious. The Danites sought religious objects not out of a heart for God, but as a means to legitimize their own agenda and secure their future, regardless of the objects' illicit origins. This warns against instrumentalizing faith—using God or spiritual practices for personal gain, comfort, or perceived success, rather than out of genuine reverence and obedience. Furthermore, the syncretism evident in Micah's shrine and embraced by the Danites serves as a stark reminder against mixing genuine faith with worldly values or forbidden practices. True worship demands exclusive devotion to God alone, free from the idols of culture, materialism, or self-interest. In a world where personal truth often supersedes objective truth, the "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" mentality of Judges is a powerful caution against moral relativism. God's unchanging standards, revealed in His Word, provide the only stable foundation for life and faith, calling us to reject all forms of idolatry and pursue sincere obedience to His commands, recognizing that true blessing flows from faithful adherence to His covenant.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life might I be tempted to instrumentalize my faith, seeking personal gain or comfort rather than genuine obedience to God?
  • What "graven images" or "molten images"—whether literal or metaphorical (e.g., career, possessions, reputation)—might subtly compete for my ultimate devotion to God?
  • How does the Danites' disregard for God's law challenge my own willingness to compromise biblical principles for convenience or perceived success?
  • In what ways might syncretism manifest in my own spiritual practices or beliefs, blending Christian truth with unbiblical ideas from the world?

FAQ

Why did the Danites take these specific cultic items, and what was their significance?

Answer: The Danites took a "graven image," an "ephod," "teraphim," and a "molten image" because these were the objects that constituted Micah's private shrine and were believed to confer religious authority and divine favor. The "graven" and "molten" images were direct violations of the second commandment (Exodus 20:4), representing forbidden idols. The "ephod," while a legitimate priestly garment in its proper context (Exodus 28:6), had become an object of illicit worship or divination in this corrupt setting, similar to Gideon's ephod (Judges 8:27). "Teraphim" were household idols, often used for divination or as symbols of family status. By taking this collection, the Danites aimed to establish a comprehensive religious center in their new territory, believing these items, along with the Levite priest, would legitimize their settlement and ensure divine blessing for their endeavors, despite the illicit and syncretistic nature of the objects themselves. They were seeking a form of religious validation, albeit a corrupted one, for their new community, demonstrating a profound misunderstanding of God's nature and His requirements for worship.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Judges 18:17, with its stark portrayal of self-serving religion and rampant idolatry, powerfully underscores humanity's desperate need for a true and faithful High Priest and a pure way of worship, found only in Jesus Christ. The Danites' attempt to establish a religious system based on stolen idols and a mercenary priest reveals the spiritual barrenness of a people "doing what was right in their own eyes," creating gods in their own image. In contrast, Jesus Christ is the ultimate reality to which all true worship points. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, making obsolete the need for any physical image or object to mediate between God and humanity. Unlike the corrupted ephod used for illicit divination, Christ is our Great High Priest who perfectly intercedes for us, having entered the true heavenly sanctuary once for all (Hebrews 9:11-14). The New Testament consistently warns against idolatry, whether of carved images or the idols of the heart (Colossians 3:5; 1 John 5:21), pointing believers to worship God "in spirit and truth" (John 4:23-24), a worship centered entirely on Christ and His finished work, not on man-made objects or self-serving rituals. He is the "something greater than the temple" (Matthew 12:6), embodying the presence of God that the idols could never provide, and offering a relationship built on grace and truth, not theft and compromise.

Copy as

Commentary on Judges 18 verses 14–26

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

The Danites had sent out their spies to find out a country for them, and they sped well in their search; but here, now that they came to the place (for till this brought it to their mind it does not appear that they had mentioned it to their brethren), they oblige them with a further discovery - they can tell them where there are gods: "Here, in these houses, there are an ephod, and teraphim, and a great many fine things for devotion, such as we have not the like in our country; now therefore consider what you have to do, Jdg 18:14. We consulted them, and had a good answer from them; they are worth having, nay, they are worth stealing (that is, having upon the worst terms), and, if we can but make ourselves masters of these gods, we may the better hope to prosper, and make ourselves masters of Laish." So far they were in the right, that it was desirable to have God's presence with them, but wretchedly mistaken when they took these images (which were fitter to be used in a puppet-play than in acts of devotion) for tokens of God's presence. They thought an oracle would be pretty company for them in their enterprise, and instead of a council of war to consult upon every emergency; and, the place they were going to settle in being so far from Shiloh, they thought they had more need of a house of gods among themselves than Micah had that lived so near to it. They might have made as good an ephod and teraphim themselves as these were, and such as would have served their purpose every whit as well; but the reputation which they found them in possession of (though they had had that reputation but a while) amused them into a strange veneration for this house of gods, which they would soon have dropped if they had had so much sense as to enquire into its origin, and examine whether there were any thing divine in its institution. Being determined to take these gods along with them, we are here told how they stole the images, cajoled the priest, and frightened Micah from attempting to rescue them.

I. The five men that knew the house and the avenues to it, and particularly the chapel, went in and fetched out the images, with the ephod, and teraphim, and all the appurtenances, while the 600 kept the priest in talk at the gate, Jdg 18:16-18. See what little care this sorry priest took of his gods; while he was sauntering at the gate, and gazing at the strangers, his treasure (such as it was) was gone. See how impotent these sorry gods were, that could not keep themselves from being stolen. It is mentioned as the reproach of idols that they themselves had gone into captivity, Isa 46:2. O the sottishness of these Danites! How could they imagine those gods should protect them that could not keep themselves from being stolen? Yet because they went by the name of gods, as if it were not enough that they had with them the presence of the invisible God, nor that they stood in relation to the tabernacle, where there were even visible tokens of his presence, nothing will serve them but they must have gods to go before them, not of their own making indeed, but, which was as bad, of their own stealing. Their idolatry began in theft, a proper prologue for such an opera. In order to the breaking of the second commandment, they begin with the eighth, and take their neighbour's goods to make them their gods. The holy God hates robbery for burnt-offerings, but the devil loves it. Had these Danites seized the images to deface and abolish them, and the priest to punish him, they would have done like Israelites indeed, and would have appeared jealous for their God as their fathers had done (Jos 22:16); but to take them for their own use was such a complicated crime as showed that they neither feared God nor regarded man, but were perfectly lost both to godliness and honesty.

II. They set upon the priest, and flattered him into a good humour, not only to let the gods go, but to go himself along with them; for without him they knew not well how to make use of the gods. Observe, 1. How they tempted him, Jdg 18:19. They assured him of better preferment with them than what he now had. It would be more honour and profit to be chaplain to a regiment (for they were no more, though they called themselves a tribe) than to be only a domestic chaplain to a private gentleman. Let him go with them, and he shall have more dependants on him, more sacrifices brought to his altar, and more fees for consulting his teraphim, than he had here. 2. How they won him. A little persuasion served: His heart was glad, Jdg 18:20. The proposal took well enough with his rambling fancy, which would never let him stay long at a place, and gratified his covetousness and ambition. He had no reason to say but that he was well off where he was; Micah had not deceived him, nor changed his wages. He was not moved with any remorse of conscience for attending on a graven image: had he gone away to Shiloh to minister to the Lord's priests, according to the duty of a Levite, he might have been welcome there (Deu 18:6), and his removal would have been commendable; but, instead of this, he takes the images with him, and carries the infection of the idolatry into a whole city. It would have been very unjust and ungrateful to Micah if he had only gone away himself, but it was much more so to take the images along with him, which he knew the heart of Micah was set upon. Yet better could not be expected from a treacherous Levite. What house can be sure of him who has forsaken the house of the Lord? Or what friend will he be true to that has been false to his God? He could not pretend that he was under compulsive force, for he was glad in his heart to go. If ten shekels won him (as bishop Hall expresses it), eleven would lose him; for what can hold those that have made shipwreck of a good conscience? The hireling flees because he is a hireling. The priest and his gods went in the midst of the people. There they placed him, that they might secure him either from going back himself, if his mind should change, or from being fetched back by Micah; or perhaps this post was assigned to him in imitation of the order of Israel's march through the wilderness, in which the ark and the priests went in the midst of their camp.

III. They frightened Micah back when he pursued them to recover his gods. As soon as ever he perceived that his chapel was plundered, and his chaplain had run away from him, he mustered all the forces he could and pursued the robbers, Jdg 18:22. His neighbours, and perhaps tenants, that used to join with him in his devotions, were forward to help him on this occasion; they got together, and pursued the robbers, who, having their children and cattle before them (Jdg 18:21), could make no great haste, so that they soon overtook them, hoping by strength of reason to recover what was stolen, for the disproportion of their numbers was such that they could not hope to do it by strength of arm. The pursuers called after them, desiring to speak a word with them; those in the rear (where it is probable they posted the fiercest and strongest of their company, expecting there to be attacked) turned about and asked Micah what ailed him that he was so much concerned, and what he would have, Jdg 18:23. He argues with them, and pleads his right, which he thought should prevail; but they, in answer, plead their might, which, it proved, did prevail; for it is common that might overcomes right.

1.He insists upon the wrong they had certainly done him (Jdg 18:24): "You have taken away my gods, my images of God, which I have an incontestable title to, for I made them myself, and which I have such an affection for that I am undone if I lose them; for what have I more that will do me any good if these be lost?" Now, (1.) This discovers to us the folly of idolaters, and the power that Satan has over them. What a folly was it for him to call those his gods which he had made, when he only that made us is to be worshipped by us as a God! Folly indeed to set his heart upon such silly idle things, and to look upon himself as undone when he had lost them! (2.) This may discover to us our spiritual idolatry. That creature which we place our happiness in, which we set our affections inordinately upon, and which we can by no means find in our hearts to part with, of which we say, "What have we more?" that we make an idol of. That is put in God's place, and is a usurper, which we are concerned about as if our life and comfort, our hope and happiness, and our all, were bound up in it. But, (3.) If all people will thus walk in the name of their god, shall we not be in like manner affected towards our God, the true God? Let us reckon the having of an interest in God and communion with him incomparably the richest portion, and the loss of God the sorest loss. Woe unto us if he depart, for what have we more? Deserted souls that are lamenting after the Lord may well wonder, as Micah did, that you should ask what ails them; for the tokens of God's favour are suspended, his comforts are withdrawn, and what have they more?

2.They insist upon the mischief they would certainly do him if he prosecuted his demand. They would not hear reason, nor do justice, nor so much as offer to pay him the prime cost he had been at upon those images, nor promise to make restitution of what they had taken when they had served their present purpose with them in this expedition and had time to copy them and make others like them for themselves: much less had they any compassion for a loss he so bitterly lamented. They would not so much as give him good words, but resolved to justify their robbery with murder if he did not immediately let fall his claims, Jdg 18:25. "Take heed lest angry fellows run upon thee, and thou lose thy life, and that is worse than losing thy gods." Wicked and unreasonable men reckon it a great provocation to be asked to do justice, and support themselves by their power against right and reason. Micah's crime is asking his own, yet, for this, he is in danger of losing his life and the lives of his household. Micah has not courage enough to venture his life for the rescue of his gods, so little opinion has he of their being able to protect him and bear him out, and therefore tamely gives them up (Jdg 18:26): He turned and went back to his house; and if the loss of his idols did but convince him (as, one would think, it should) of their vanity and impotency, and his own folly in setting his heart upon them, and send him back to the true God from whom he had revolted, he that lost them had a much better bargain than those that by force of arms carried them off. If the loss of our idols cure us of the love of them, and make us say, What have we to do any more with idols? the loss will be unspeakable gain. See Isa 2:20; Isa 30:22.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 14–26. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Judges 18:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.