Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And they turned thitherward, and came to the house of the young man the Levite, even unto the house of Micah, and saluted him.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And they turned H5493 thitherward, and came H935 to the house H1004 of the young man H5288 the Levite H3881, even unto the house H1004 of Micah H4318, and saluted H7592 H7965 him.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
They turned off the road and went to the house of the young Levi, that is, to Mikhah's house, and asked how he was doing.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So they turned aside there and went to the home of the young Levite, the house of Micah, and greeted him.
Ask
American Standard Version
And they turned aside thither, and came to the house of the young man the Levite, even unto the house of Micah, and asked him of his welfare.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
They turned aside there, and came to the house of the young man the Levite, even to the house of Micah, and asked him of his welfare.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And they turned thitherward and came to the house of the yong man the Leuite, euen vnto the house of Michah, and saluted him peaceably.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And they turn aside thither, and come in unto the house of the young man the Levite, the house of Micah, and ask of him of welfare, --
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 7,009 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Judges 18:15 marks a pivotal moment in the Danites' calculated quest for new territory, detailing the deliberate arrival of their 600-man expeditionary force at Micah's house in Ephraim. Having previously scouted the area, the Danites intentionally approach the residence where they know the young Levite, serving as Micah's personal priest for his idolatrous shrine, resides. Their seemingly polite "salutation" to the Levite and Micah is a thinly veiled act of deception, masking a sinister, premeditated intent to appropriate both the religious artifacts and the spiritual authority for their own tribal purposes, thereby setting the stage for a profound act of theft and spiritual usurpation that powerfully epitomizes the moral and spiritual decline of the era of the Judges.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Judges 18:15 is situated within the disturbing narrative of Judges 17-18, which serves as a vivid illustration of Israel's spiritual and moral decline during the period of the Judges. The preceding chapter, Judges 17, introduces Micah, an Ephraimite who establishes a private idolatrous shrine, complete with a molten image, a graven image, and ephod and teraphim. He then hires a wandering Levite, a descendant of Moses, to serve as his personal priest, a clear deviation from Mosaic law. Chapter 18 opens with the tribe of Dan seeking new territory, as they had not fully dispossessed the Philistines from their allotted inheritance. Five Danite spies, dispatched to scout the land, previously encountered this Levite at Micah's house in Judges 18:3 and consulted him regarding their journey, receiving a favorable, though self-serving, oracle. Upon their return, they reported finding the vulnerable, undefended city of Laish, ripe for conquest. Verse 15 details the arrival of the main Danite expeditionary force, not merely passing by, but intentionally coming to Micah's house, fully aware of the idolatrous setup and the Levite's presence, with a clear, pre-meditated intention based on the spies' prior knowledge. This arrival sets the stage for the brazen theft and coercion that follows.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period of the Judges (approximately 1400-1050 BC) was characterized by a decentralized tribal system in Israel, marked by intermittent foreign oppression and cycles of apostasy, judgment, repentance, and deliverance through divinely appointed judges. Crucially, as the book repeatedly states, "in those days there was no king in Israel" (Judges 17:6; Judges 21:25). This absence of a central, righteous authority led to widespread moral relativism and spiritual chaos, where "every man did that which was right in his own eyes." The narrative of Micah and the Danites exemplifies this breakdown. The Levite's willingness to serve a private idolatrous shrine, rather than the Tabernacle, underscores the severe spiritual corruption and disregard for the Mosaic Law concerning worship and the role of the priesthood. The Danites' actions, including their disregard for tribal boundaries and their violent seizure of land and religious artifacts, reflect a society where covenant obligations were largely ignored in favor of self-interest and expediency.
  • Key Themes: The events surrounding Judges 18:15 contribute significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Judges. Foremost is the theme of Spiritual Apostasy and Idolatry, vividly portraying the widespread compromise and departure from Yahweh worship. A Levite, consecrated for service to God, is found facilitating a private, unauthorized, and idolatrous cult, highlighting the deep corruption within the religious sphere itself. This narrative also powerfully illustrates the Lack of Central Authority and Moral Relativism, where the absence of a righteous king leads to a society where individuals and tribes act according to their own perceived "rightness," rather than God's revealed will. The Danites' actions, from their initial scouting to their calculated deception and subsequent theft, underscore a chilling Opportunism and Self-Interest that overrides any sense of covenant fidelity or brotherly concern. Their "salutation" in this verse, outwardly cordial but inwardly deceitful, foreshadows the brazen Usurpation of Sacred Things as they prepare to steal Micah's idols and coerce his priest, demonstrating a profound disregard for the sanctity of worship and the divine order. The entire episode serves as a stark warning about the dangers of spiritual decline when God's law is abandoned.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • turned (Hebrew, çûwr', H5493): This word (H5493) signifies a deliberate deviation or turning aside. In the context of Judges 18:15, it emphasizes that the Danites' arrival at Micah's house was not accidental but a calculated, intentional act. Their "turning thitherward" was a purposeful diversion from their primary journey to Laish, driven by the intelligence gathered by their spies. This highlights the premeditated nature of their subsequent actions, indicating a focused objective rather than a casual stop.
  • house (Hebrew, bayith', H1004): The term "house" (H1004) here refers not merely to a physical dwelling but, by implication, to Micah's household and the private religious establishment within it. This "house" had become a center for idolatrous worship, housing the molten image, graven image, ephod, and teraphim. The Danites' intentional approach to this specific "house" underscores their target: not just a place, but a spiritual entity they intended to appropriate, representing a perversion of the traditional Israelite home as a place of Yahweh worship.
  • saluted (Hebrew, shâʼal' and shâlôwm', H7592): The KJV translates this as "saluted him," but the Hebrew idiom combines the verb shâʼal (H7592, to ask, inquire) with the noun shâlôwm (H7965, peace, well-being), meaning literally "they inquired of his well-being" or "they asked him concerning peace." This is more than a casual greeting; it's a formal inquiry often used to assess a situation or initiate conversation with a specific purpose. In this context, it carries a veneer of politeness that thinly veils the Danites' true, sinister intentions, serving as a deceptive overture before their act of theft and coercion.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And they turned thitherward": This clause highlights the intentionality of the Danites' actions. Having received the report from their spies about Micah's household and the Levite, the main expeditionary force deliberately diverted their path. This was not a chance encounter but a pre-planned stop, indicating that Micah's religious setup was a known factor in their strategic calculations for their new settlement.
  • "and came to the house of the young man the Levite, [even] unto the house of Micah": This specifies their destination, emphasizing the dual identity of the dwelling. It was the Levite's residence because he lived there as Micah's hired priest, but it was fundamentally Micah's house, where the idolatrous shrine was established. This detail underscores the Danites' precise knowledge of the location and its inhabitants, gained from their earlier reconnaissance, and pinpoints the target of their spiritual appropriation.
  • "and saluted him": This final phrase describes their initial interaction. As discussed in the Key Word Analysis, "saluted him" implies a formal inquiry of peace or well-being. On the surface, it appears courteous, but given the context of the Danites' subsequent actions, it serves as a deceptive overture. It allowed them to assess the situation, perhaps distract Micah and the Levite, and set the stage for their planned appropriation of the idols and the priest for their own tribal cult. This "salutation" is a chilling example of how outward politeness can mask profound ill intent.

Literary Devices

The narrative in Judges 18:15 employs several literary devices to enhance its impact. The use of Foreshadowing is prominent, as the seemingly innocuous act of "saluting" the Levite and Micah subtly hints at the darker intentions of the Danites, preparing the reader for the subsequent theft and coercion. There is a strong element of Irony, particularly Dramatic Irony, where the reader understands the Danites' true motives while Micah and the Levite are seemingly unaware of the impending betrayal masked by the polite greeting. The phrase "turned thitherward" also functions as Emphasis, drawing attention to the deliberate and calculated nature of the Danites' diversion, highlighting their opportunistic and ungodly agenda. Furthermore, the detailed description of their arrival at "the house of the young man the Levite, [even] unto the house of Micah" provides Specific Detail that grounds the narrative, making the subsequent events more immediate and impactful, while also underscoring the precise target of their premeditated actions.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Judges 18:15, though a single verse, powerfully encapsulates the theological and moral decay prevalent in Israel during the Judges period. It underscores the profound dangers of spiritual syncretism and the abandonment of God's covenant. The Danites' calculated approach to Micah's idolatrous household, culminating in a deceptive "salutation," reveals a society where spiritual authority is commodified, and divine law is disregarded for tribal expediency. This scene is a microcosm of the book's overarching message: when there is no righteous king and every man does what is right in his own eyes, the result is not freedom but chaos, moral compromise, and the perversion of sacred things. It highlights how quickly a people can drift from God's commands when central spiritual leadership is absent and personal gain overshadows covenant faithfulness. The Danites' actions here are not merely a tribal land grab but a spiritual usurpation, demonstrating how far Israel had fallen from its calling to be a holy nation.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The narrative of Judges 18:15, while ancient, provides profound lessons for contemporary believers. It serves as a stark warning against the insidious nature of spiritual compromise and the dangers of allowing personal or communal expediency to supersede divine truth. Just as the Danites opportunistically seized upon Micah's idolatrous setup, we must guard against the temptation to adopt "convenient" spiritual practices or beliefs that are not rooted in God's Word. This verse challenges us to examine our own lives and communities: Are we truly seeking God's will, or are we, like the Danites, operating under a veneer of politeness or religious activity while pursuing our own agendas? The Levite's willingness to serve a private, unauthorized shrine reminds us of the importance of discerning true spiritual authority and remaining vigilant against those who would exploit faith for personal gain or tribal advantage. Ultimately, Judges 18:15 calls us to an uncompromising commitment to biblical truth, a rejection of moral relativism, and a steadfast pursuit of genuine, God-honoring worship, even when it is counter-cultural or inconvenient. It compels us to ask if our "salutations" to the world are truly sincere or merely a disguise for compromise.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life might I be tempted to compromise biblical truth for personal convenience or societal acceptance?
  • How do I discern authentic spiritual leadership from those who might exploit faith for their own ends?
  • What "idols" or self-made spiritual systems might I be unknowingly "saluting" or accommodating in my own life or community?
  • How does the absence of a "king" (i.e., absolute adherence to God's authority) manifest in modern moral relativism, and how can I counter it?

FAQ

Why is the Levite's presence at Micah's house so significant and problematic?

Answer: The Levite's presence is profoundly problematic because it represents a severe perversion of his divinely appointed role. Levites were consecrated to serve Yahweh at the central sanctuary (initially the Tabernacle, later the Temple), teaching God's law and mediating proper worship (Deuteronomy 33:10). For a Levite to abandon this sacred duty and instead serve a private citizen's idolatrous shrine, complete with molten and graven images, signifies a complete breakdown of covenant fidelity and spiritual order. It highlights the widespread apostasy and moral decay in Israel, where even those entrusted with upholding God's law were compromised, doing "what was right in their own eyes" (Judges 17:6). His willingness to be hired for such a purpose underscores the commodification of spiritual authority and the deep corruption of the era.

What does the Danites' "salutation" reveal about their character?

Answer: The Danites' "salutation" (Hebrew: wayyišʾălû lō šālôm, "they inquired of his well-being") reveals a chilling blend of calculated deception and opportunism. On the surface, it appears as a polite, customary greeting, but it masks their true, sinister intentions. They were not genuinely concerned for the well-being of Micah or the Levite; rather, they were assessing the situation, perhaps distracting their hosts, before executing their premeditated plan to steal Micah's idols and coerce the Levite into serving their own tribal cult. This act of feigned cordiality demonstrates their moral depravity and their willingness to use any means, including hypocrisy, to achieve their self-serving goals. It underscores the theme of moral relativism prevalent in the book, where outward appearances belie corrupt internal motives, as seen throughout the narrative of Judges 18.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Judges 18:15, situated within a narrative of profound spiritual decline, highlights Israel's desperate need for a true King and a faithful High Priest—a need ultimately fulfilled in Jesus Christ. The Levite in this passage, a descendant of Moses, represents the failure of the Old Covenant priesthood to maintain fidelity and spiritual order, serving an idolatrous cult for personal gain rather than pointing to the one true God. This stands in stark contrast to Jesus, our great High Priest, who is "holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens" (Hebrews 7:26). Unlike the opportunistic Danites who sought to appropriate spiritual symbols for their own tribal advantage, Christ did not come to seize earthly power or to establish a kingdom based on human expediency. Instead, He came to lay down His life as the perfect sacrifice for the sins of the world, fulfilling the true purpose of the Levitical system which merely foreshadowed His ultimate atonement. The chaos and moral relativism of Judges, where "every man did what was right in his own eyes," underscore the necessity of God's righteous rule, which is perfectly embodied in Christ, the King of kings and Lord of lords. He alone provides the true spiritual authority, the unwavering moral standard, and the pathway to genuine peace that the people of Judges so desperately lacked, inviting all to follow Him, the way, the truth, and the life, rather than pursuing self-made religion or opportunistic gain.

Copy as

Commentary on Judges 18 verses 14–26

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

The Danites had sent out their spies to find out a country for them, and they sped well in their search; but here, now that they came to the place (for till this brought it to their mind it does not appear that they had mentioned it to their brethren), they oblige them with a further discovery - they can tell them where there are gods: "Here, in these houses, there are an ephod, and teraphim, and a great many fine things for devotion, such as we have not the like in our country; now therefore consider what you have to do, Jdg 18:14. We consulted them, and had a good answer from them; they are worth having, nay, they are worth stealing (that is, having upon the worst terms), and, if we can but make ourselves masters of these gods, we may the better hope to prosper, and make ourselves masters of Laish." So far they were in the right, that it was desirable to have God's presence with them, but wretchedly mistaken when they took these images (which were fitter to be used in a puppet-play than in acts of devotion) for tokens of God's presence. They thought an oracle would be pretty company for them in their enterprise, and instead of a council of war to consult upon every emergency; and, the place they were going to settle in being so far from Shiloh, they thought they had more need of a house of gods among themselves than Micah had that lived so near to it. They might have made as good an ephod and teraphim themselves as these were, and such as would have served their purpose every whit as well; but the reputation which they found them in possession of (though they had had that reputation but a while) amused them into a strange veneration for this house of gods, which they would soon have dropped if they had had so much sense as to enquire into its origin, and examine whether there were any thing divine in its institution. Being determined to take these gods along with them, we are here told how they stole the images, cajoled the priest, and frightened Micah from attempting to rescue them.

I. The five men that knew the house and the avenues to it, and particularly the chapel, went in and fetched out the images, with the ephod, and teraphim, and all the appurtenances, while the 600 kept the priest in talk at the gate, Jdg 18:16-18. See what little care this sorry priest took of his gods; while he was sauntering at the gate, and gazing at the strangers, his treasure (such as it was) was gone. See how impotent these sorry gods were, that could not keep themselves from being stolen. It is mentioned as the reproach of idols that they themselves had gone into captivity, Isa 46:2. O the sottishness of these Danites! How could they imagine those gods should protect them that could not keep themselves from being stolen? Yet because they went by the name of gods, as if it were not enough that they had with them the presence of the invisible God, nor that they stood in relation to the tabernacle, where there were even visible tokens of his presence, nothing will serve them but they must have gods to go before them, not of their own making indeed, but, which was as bad, of their own stealing. Their idolatry began in theft, a proper prologue for such an opera. In order to the breaking of the second commandment, they begin with the eighth, and take their neighbour's goods to make them their gods. The holy God hates robbery for burnt-offerings, but the devil loves it. Had these Danites seized the images to deface and abolish them, and the priest to punish him, they would have done like Israelites indeed, and would have appeared jealous for their God as their fathers had done (Jos 22:16); but to take them for their own use was such a complicated crime as showed that they neither feared God nor regarded man, but were perfectly lost both to godliness and honesty.

II. They set upon the priest, and flattered him into a good humour, not only to let the gods go, but to go himself along with them; for without him they knew not well how to make use of the gods. Observe, 1. How they tempted him, Jdg 18:19. They assured him of better preferment with them than what he now had. It would be more honour and profit to be chaplain to a regiment (for they were no more, though they called themselves a tribe) than to be only a domestic chaplain to a private gentleman. Let him go with them, and he shall have more dependants on him, more sacrifices brought to his altar, and more fees for consulting his teraphim, than he had here. 2. How they won him. A little persuasion served: His heart was glad, Jdg 18:20. The proposal took well enough with his rambling fancy, which would never let him stay long at a place, and gratified his covetousness and ambition. He had no reason to say but that he was well off where he was; Micah had not deceived him, nor changed his wages. He was not moved with any remorse of conscience for attending on a graven image: had he gone away to Shiloh to minister to the Lord's priests, according to the duty of a Levite, he might have been welcome there (Deu 18:6), and his removal would have been commendable; but, instead of this, he takes the images with him, and carries the infection of the idolatry into a whole city. It would have been very unjust and ungrateful to Micah if he had only gone away himself, but it was much more so to take the images along with him, which he knew the heart of Micah was set upon. Yet better could not be expected from a treacherous Levite. What house can be sure of him who has forsaken the house of the Lord? Or what friend will he be true to that has been false to his God? He could not pretend that he was under compulsive force, for he was glad in his heart to go. If ten shekels won him (as bishop Hall expresses it), eleven would lose him; for what can hold those that have made shipwreck of a good conscience? The hireling flees because he is a hireling. The priest and his gods went in the midst of the people. There they placed him, that they might secure him either from going back himself, if his mind should change, or from being fetched back by Micah; or perhaps this post was assigned to him in imitation of the order of Israel's march through the wilderness, in which the ark and the priests went in the midst of their camp.

III. They frightened Micah back when he pursued them to recover his gods. As soon as ever he perceived that his chapel was plundered, and his chaplain had run away from him, he mustered all the forces he could and pursued the robbers, Jdg 18:22. His neighbours, and perhaps tenants, that used to join with him in his devotions, were forward to help him on this occasion; they got together, and pursued the robbers, who, having their children and cattle before them (Jdg 18:21), could make no great haste, so that they soon overtook them, hoping by strength of reason to recover what was stolen, for the disproportion of their numbers was such that they could not hope to do it by strength of arm. The pursuers called after them, desiring to speak a word with them; those in the rear (where it is probable they posted the fiercest and strongest of their company, expecting there to be attacked) turned about and asked Micah what ailed him that he was so much concerned, and what he would have, Jdg 18:23. He argues with them, and pleads his right, which he thought should prevail; but they, in answer, plead their might, which, it proved, did prevail; for it is common that might overcomes right.

1.He insists upon the wrong they had certainly done him (Jdg 18:24): "You have taken away my gods, my images of God, which I have an incontestable title to, for I made them myself, and which I have such an affection for that I am undone if I lose them; for what have I more that will do me any good if these be lost?" Now, (1.) This discovers to us the folly of idolaters, and the power that Satan has over them. What a folly was it for him to call those his gods which he had made, when he only that made us is to be worshipped by us as a God! Folly indeed to set his heart upon such silly idle things, and to look upon himself as undone when he had lost them! (2.) This may discover to us our spiritual idolatry. That creature which we place our happiness in, which we set our affections inordinately upon, and which we can by no means find in our hearts to part with, of which we say, "What have we more?" that we make an idol of. That is put in God's place, and is a usurper, which we are concerned about as if our life and comfort, our hope and happiness, and our all, were bound up in it. But, (3.) If all people will thus walk in the name of their god, shall we not be in like manner affected towards our God, the true God? Let us reckon the having of an interest in God and communion with him incomparably the richest portion, and the loss of God the sorest loss. Woe unto us if he depart, for what have we more? Deserted souls that are lamenting after the Lord may well wonder, as Micah did, that you should ask what ails them; for the tokens of God's favour are suspended, his comforts are withdrawn, and what have they more?

2.They insist upon the mischief they would certainly do him if he prosecuted his demand. They would not hear reason, nor do justice, nor so much as offer to pay him the prime cost he had been at upon those images, nor promise to make restitution of what they had taken when they had served their present purpose with them in this expedition and had time to copy them and make others like them for themselves: much less had they any compassion for a loss he so bitterly lamented. They would not so much as give him good words, but resolved to justify their robbery with murder if he did not immediately let fall his claims, Jdg 18:25. "Take heed lest angry fellows run upon thee, and thou lose thy life, and that is worse than losing thy gods." Wicked and unreasonable men reckon it a great provocation to be asked to do justice, and support themselves by their power against right and reason. Micah's crime is asking his own, yet, for this, he is in danger of losing his life and the lives of his household. Micah has not courage enough to venture his life for the rescue of his gods, so little opinion has he of their being able to protect him and bear him out, and therefore tamely gives them up (Jdg 18:26): He turned and went back to his house; and if the loss of his idols did but convince him (as, one would think, it should) of their vanity and impotency, and his own folly in setting his heart upon them, and send him back to the true God from whom he had revolted, he that lost them had a much better bargain than those that by force of arms carried them off. If the loss of our idols cure us of the love of them, and make us say, What have we to do any more with idols? the loss will be unspeakable gain. See Isa 2:20; Isa 30:22.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 14–26. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Judges 18:15 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.