Skip to content

John 5:16

“Controversy Over the Sabbath”· John 5:10–16Read in context
King James Version
And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and sought to slay him, because he had done these things on the sabbath day.
KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 therefore G1223 G5124 did G1377 the Jews G2453 persecute G1377 Jesus G2424, and G2532 sought G2212 to slay G615 him G846, because G3754 he had done G4160 these things G5023 on G1722 the sabbath day G4521.
Complete Jewish Bible
and on account of this, the Judeans began harassing Yeshua because he did these things on Shabbat.
Berean Standard Bible
Now because Jesus was doing these things on the Sabbath, the Jews began to persecute Him.
American Standard Version
And for this cause the Jews persecuted Jesus, because he did these things on the sabbath.
World English Bible Messianic
For this cause the Judeans persecuted Yeshua, and sought to kill him, because he did these things on the Sabbath.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And therefore the Iewes did persecute Iesus, and sought to slay him, because he had done these things on the Sabbath day.
Young's Literal Translation
and because of this were the Jews persecuting Jesus, and seeking to kill him, because these things he was doing on a sabbath.
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
All John Sites (Jerusalem)
All John Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Jesus' Second Journey from Galilee to Jerusalem
Jesus' Second Journey from Galilee to Jerusalem View full PDF
All John Sites (Levant)
All John Sites (Levant) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 26,227 of 31,102 · 84.3%

Study this verse

Summary

John 5:16 marks a critical turning point in the Gospel narrative, revealing the escalating hostility of the Jewish religious authorities towards Jesus. Following His miraculous healing of an invalid man at the Pool of Bethesda on the Sabbath, this verse explicitly states that "the Jews" began to actively persecute Jesus and sought to kill Him, precisely because His actions on the sacred day were perceived as a direct violation of their meticulously interpreted Sabbath laws. This incident underscores the deep chasm between Jesus' compassionate, life-giving ministry and the rigid legalism of His opponents, setting the stage for profound theological conflicts regarding His identity and authority.

Context

Literary Context

John 5:16 immediately follows Jesus' healing of a man who had been an invalid for thirty-eight years at the Pool of Bethesda (John 5:1-9). Jesus not only healed the man but also instructed him to pick up his mat and walk, an act explicitly forbidden by the rabbinic interpretations of Sabbath law, which considered carrying a burden "work" (John 5:10). The man's subsequent testimony to the Jewish leaders that "It was Jesus who made me well" (John 5:15) directly implicates Jesus, shifting the focus from the healed man's perceived transgression to Jesus' authority. This verse, therefore, serves as a direct consequence of Jesus' actions and the man's disclosure, initiating the overt persecution that would intensify throughout John's Gospel. It also sets the stage for Jesus' profound defense of His actions and His divine Sonship in the subsequent verses (John 5:17-47).

Historical & Cultural Context

The Sabbath was a foundational institution in ancient Israel, established by God as a day of rest and worship, commemorating His rest after creation (Exodus 20:8-11) and serving as a sign of the covenant (Ezekiel 20:12). Over centuries, particularly during the Second Temple period, rabbinic traditions and oral laws (later codified in the Mishnah) developed an intricate system of prohibitions and permissions regarding Sabbath observance. These traditions, while intended to safeguard the divine command, often became burdensome and legalistic, defining 39 categories of forbidden "work" (melakhah) with numerous sub-categories. Healing, unless life-threatening, was generally prohibited by these traditions. Jesus' act of healing and instructing the man to carry his mat was thus a direct challenge not to the divine law of the Sabbath itself, but to the authoritative, man-made interpretations that governed its observance. The Jewish leaders' reaction stems from their zeal to uphold these traditions, which they viewed as equally binding as the written Torah.

Key Themes

This verse is pivotal in highlighting several recurring themes within John's Gospel and the broader New Testament. Firstly, it underscores the Sabbath Controversy, a recurring point of contention between Jesus and the religious authorities (Matthew 12:1-14). Jesus consistently demonstrated that the Sabbath was intended for humanity's benefit and that acts of mercy and compassion were always permissible, asserting His authority as "Lord of the Sabbath" (Mark 2:27-28). Secondly, it marks a significant escalation in the Opposition to Jesus, moving from mere questioning or theological debate to active "persecution" and a declared intent to "slay him." This foreshadows the ultimate conflict that will lead to Jesus' crucifixion. Thirdly, it starkly contrasts Religious Legalism with Divine Compassion. The leaders' rigid adherence to their traditions blinded them to the profound miracle and the compassionate act of healing a man who had suffered for nearly four decades. Their zeal for the law, as they understood it, overshadowed the very purpose of God's law—to bring life and blessing. Finally, the incident implicitly raises questions about Jesus' Authority and Identity. Their anger was not solely about the Sabbath "violation" but also about the implicit claim of authority Jesus exercised, an authority that allowed Him to seemingly transgress their interpretations of the law. This challenge to their established authority and understanding of God's law would lead to Jesus' profound claims of equality with God in the verses immediately following (John 5:17-18).

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

persecute diṓkō' G1377

This word means "to pursue (literally or figuratively); by implication, to persecute." It suggests an active, hostile pursuit, harassment, or oppression, not merely passive disapproval. In this context, it indicates that the Jewish leaders were not simply disagreeing with Jesus but were actively seeking to harm or oppress Him, initiating a campaign against Him.

sought zētéō' G2212

Meaning "to seek (literally or figuratively); specially, (by Hebraism) to worship (God), or (in a bad sense) to plot (against life)." Here, it is used in the bad sense, indicating a deliberate and active plotting or scheming against Jesus' life. It highlights their determined and malicious intent.

slay apokteínō' G615

Meaning "to kill outright; figuratively, to destroy." This word unequivocally states their ultimate goal: to put Jesus to death. Coupled with "sought," it emphasizes the gravity and murderous intent of their opposition, moving beyond mere theological disagreement to a desire for His physical elimination.

sabbath day sábbaton' G4521

Meaning "the Sabbath (i.e. Shabbath), or day of weekly repose from secular avocations (also the observance or institution itself)." This word identifies the specific context and the perceived transgression. It is the very institution meant for rest and worship that becomes the flashpoint for persecution, revealing the extent to which human traditions had distorted divine intent.

Verse Breakdown

"And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus,"

This clause establishes the direct causal link between Jesus' actions (healing on the Sabbath) and the response of "the Jews" (referring here specifically to the religious authorities in Jerusalem, particularly those opposing Jesus). The persecution was not a random act but a deliberate, active campaign of harassment and opposition, initiated by His perceived violation of their Sabbath regulations.

"and sought to slay him,"

This phrase reveals the extreme and murderous intent behind their persecution. Their goal was not merely to silence Jesus or discredit Him, but to terminate His life. This signifies a dangerous escalation, indicating that their opposition had moved beyond legal or theological debate to a desire for His physical elimination. The seeking implies a deliberate plotting and planning.

"because he had done these things on the sabbath day."

This final clause provides the explicit reason for their deadly animosity. The "things" refer to the healing of the invalid man and the instruction to carry his mat, both considered breaches of their Sabbath laws. This highlights the profound irony: they sought to kill the Giver of Life for an act of life-giving mercy, all in the name of upholding a law intended to promote life and holiness. Their rigid adherence to tradition blinded them to the divine authority and compassionate nature of Jesus' actions.

Literary Devices

John 5:16 employs several significant literary devices. Irony is prominent, as the religious leaders, who are ostensibly devout and upholders of God's law, seek to kill the Son of God for an act of mercy performed on the very day meant for rest and blessing. Their zeal for the law, as they interpreted it, leads them to commit a grave injustice. This verse also utilizes Foreshadowing, as the expressed desire to "slay him" clearly points towards the ultimate crucifixion of Jesus. It signals the beginning of the end, where the conflict between Jesus and the authorities will inevitably lead to His death. Furthermore, the verse establishes a clear Conflict or Antagonism between Jesus and "the Jews" (the religious establishment), which is a recurring motif throughout John's Gospel. This conflict is not just theological but existential, culminating in a struggle for authority and truth.

Theological and Thematic Connections

John 5:16 profoundly illustrates the clash between genuine divine authority and human legalism, a central theme in the Gospels. Jesus' actions on the Sabbath consistently demonstrated that the law was given for humanity's benefit, not as an oppressive burden, and that acts of compassion and life-giving mercy always supersede rigid interpretations of rules. The Jewish leaders' response reveals the spiritual blindness that can result from prioritizing human traditions over God's heart, leading them to reject the very Messiah they claimed to await. This verse, therefore, serves as a stark reminder that true righteousness is found not in external adherence to rules, but in a heart aligned with God's love and compassion, as perfectly embodied by Jesus.

Matthew 12:8"For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day."
Mark 3:6"And the Pharisees went forth, and straightway took counsel with the Herodians against him, how they might destroy him."
John 7:1"After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him."

Reflection and Application

John 5:16 offers a sobering reflection on the dangers of religious legalism and the importance of prioritizing God's heart of compassion. It challenges us to examine our own faith practices: are we so focused on external rules and traditions that we miss opportunities for genuine love and mercy? Are we quick to judge others based on our interpretations, rather than seeking to understand God's broader purposes? This verse reminds us that true worship and obedience are not about rigid adherence to a checklist, but about embodying the spirit of God's law—which is love. Just as Jesus faced persecution for doing good, believers may also encounter opposition when their actions, guided by compassion and truth, challenge established norms or comfortable traditions. This should not deter us but rather reaffirm our commitment to follow Jesus, the Lord of the Sabbath, who consistently valued life and mercy above all else.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what areas of my life might I be prioritizing human traditions or rigid rules over God's compassion and mercy?
  2. How can I cultivate a heart that seeks to bring healing and life, even if it means challenging established norms or facing criticism?
  3. What does Jesus' example in this passage teach me about responding to opposition or persecution when I am seeking to do good?

FAQ

Why was healing on the Sabbath so controversial for the Jewish leaders?

While the Old Testament law prohibited "work" on the Sabbath (Exodus 20:10), it did not explicitly define all forms of work. Over centuries, rabbinic traditions developed an extensive body of oral law, meticulously detailing 39 categories of forbidden activities, with numerous sub-categories. These traditions considered healing, unless it was a life-threatening emergency, to be a form of "work" and therefore prohibited on the Sabbath. Jesus' act of healing the invalid man and instructing him to carry his mat directly violated these man-made interpretations, though not the foundational divine law itself. For the Jewish leaders, upholding these traditions was paramount to their understanding of piety and obedience to God.

Who are "the Jews" mentioned in this verse?

In John's Gospel, the phrase "the Jews" (οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι, hoi Ioudaioi) often refers not to the entire Jewish people, but specifically to the religious and political leaders in Jerusalem who opposed Jesus. This includes groups like the Pharisees, Sadducees, and members of the Sanhedrin. It distinguishes them from the general populace, many of whom followed or believed in Jesus. In this context, it signifies the official, institutional opposition to Jesus' ministry and claims.

What "things" had Jesus done on the Sabbath that provoked such a severe reaction?

The "things" Jesus had done refer specifically to two actions described in the preceding verses of John 5: first, His miraculous healing of the invalid man at the Pool of Bethesda (John 5:8); and second, His instruction to the healed man to "Take up thy bed, and walk" (John 5:8). The act of carrying a mat was considered a form of "bearing a burden" and was explicitly forbidden on the Sabbath according to rabbinic interpretations of the law (Jeremiah 17:21-22). These two actions, performed on the Sabbath, were seen as direct challenges to the religious authorities' interpretation and enforcement of the law.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

John 5:16, though describing the initial escalation of persecution against Jesus, profoundly points to His Christ-centered fulfillment. The very reason for the Jewish leaders' animosity—Jesus' actions on the Sabbath—underscores His divine authority as the "Lord of the Sabbath" (Matthew 12:8). He did not abolish the Sabbath but revealed its true purpose: to bring rest, healing, and life, demonstrating that acts of mercy are always in line with God's will. The fact that they "sought to slay him" for doing good foreshadows His ultimate mission as the Suffering Servant, prophesied in Isaiah 53. Jesus, the innocent Lamb of God, would indeed be persecuted and slain, not for His own sin, but as the atoning sacrifice for the sins of humanity (John 1:29). His willingness to face this escalating hostility, culminating in the cross, demonstrates His unwavering commitment to fulfilling the Father's will and bringing salvation to a broken world. Thus, the persecution described in John 5:16 is not merely a historical event, but a vital step in the divine plan for Christ's redemptive work, leading to His glorious resurrection and the offer of eternal life to all who believe.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers John 5:1–16. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 16 verses
Passage under commentJohn 5:1–16
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

This miraculous cure is not recorded by any other of the evangelists, who confine themselves mostly to the miracles wrought in Galilee, but John relates those wrought at Jerusalem. Concerning this observe,

I.The time when this cure was wrought:

it was at a feast of the Jews, that is, the passover, for that was the most celebrated feast. Christ, though residing in Galilee, yet went up to Jerusalem at the feast, Joh 5:1.

1.Because it was an ordinance of God, which, as a subject, he would observe, being made under the law; though as a Son he might have pleaded an exemption. Thus he would teach us to attend religious assemblies. Heb 10:25.

2.Because it was an opportunity of good; for, (1.) there were great numbers gathered together there at that time; it was a general rendezvous, at least of all serious thinking people, from all parts of the country, besides proselytes from other nations: and Wisdom must cry in the places of concourse, Pro 1:21. (2.) It was to be hoped that they were in a good frame, for they came together to worship God and to spend their time in religious exercises. Now a mind inclined to devotion, and sequestering itself to the exercises of piety, lies very open to the further discoveries of divine light and love, and to it Christ will be acceptable.

II.The place where this cure was wrought:

at the pool of Bethesda, which had a miraculous healing virtue in it, and is here particularly described, Joh 5:2-4.

1.Where it was situated: At Jerusalem, by the sheep-market; epi tē probatikē. It might as well be rendered the sheep-cote, where the sheep were kept, or the sheep-gate, which we read of, Neh 3:1, through which the sheep were brought, as the sheep-market, where they were sold. Some think it was near the temple, and, if so, it yielded a melancholy but profitable spectacle to those that went up to the temple to pray.

2.How it was called: It was a pool (a pond or bath), which is called in Hebrew, Bethesda - the house of mercy; for therein appeared much of the mercy of God to the sick and diseased. In a world of so much misery as this is, it is well that there are some Bethesdas - houses of mercy (remedies against those maladies), that the scene is not all melancholy. An alms-house, so Dr. Hammond. Dr. Lightfoot's conjecture is that this was the upper pool (Isa 7:3), and the old pool, Isa 22:11; that it had been used for washing from ceremonial pollutions, for convenience of which the porches were built to dress and undress in, but it was lately become medicinal.

3.How it was fitted up: It had five porches, cloisters, piazzas, or roofed walks, in which the sick lay. Thus the charity of men concurred with the mercy of God for the relief of the distressed. Nature has provided remedies, but men must provide hospitals.

4.How it was frequented with sick and cripples (Joh 5:3): In these lay a great multitude of impotent folks. How many are the afflictions of the afflicted in this world! How full of complaints are all places, and what multitudes of impotent folks! It may do us good to visit the hospitals sometimes, that we may take occasion, from the calamities of others, to thank God for our comforts. The evangelist specifies three sorts of diseased people that lay here, blind, halt, and withered or sinew - shrunk, either in one particular part, as the man with the withered hand, or all over paralytic. These are mentioned because, being least able to help themselves into the water, they lay longest waiting in the porches. Those that were sick of these bodily diseases took the pains to come far and had the patience to wait long for a cure; any of us would have done the same, and we ought to do so: but O that men were as wise for their souls, and as solicitous to get their spiritual diseases healed! We are all by nature impotent folks in spiritual things, blind, halt, and withered; but effectual provision is made for our cure if we will but observe orders.

5.What virtue it had for the cure of these impotent folks (Joh 5:4). An angel went down, and troubled the water; and whoso first stepped in was made whole. That this strange virtue in the pool was natural, or artificial rather, and was the effect of the washing of the sacrifices, which impregnated the water with I know not what healing virtue even for blind people, and that the angel was a messenger, a common person, sent down to stir the water, is altogether groundless; there was a room in the temple on purpose to wash the sacrifices in. Expositors generally agree that the virtue this pool had was supernatural. It is true the Jewish writers, who are not sparing in recounting the praises of Jerusalem, do none of them make the least mention of this healing pool, of which silence in this matter perhaps this is the reason, that it was taken for a presage of the near approach of the Messiah, and therefore those who denied him to be come industriously concealed such an indication of his coming; so that this is all the account we have of it. Observe,

(1.)The preparation of the medicine by an angel, who went down into the pool, and stirred the water. Angels are God's servants, and friends to mankind; and perhaps are more active in the removing of diseases (as evil angels in the inflicting of them) than we are aware of. Raphael, the apocryphal name of an angel, signifies medicina Dei - God's physic, or physician rather. See what mean offices the holy angels condescend to, for the good of men. If we would do the will of God as the angels do it, we must think nothing below us but sin. The troubling of the water was the signal given of the descent of the angel, as the going upon the tops of the mulberry trees was to David, and then they must bestir themselves. The waters of the sanctuary are then healing when they are put in motion. Ministers must stir up the gift that is in them. When they are cold and dull in their ministrations, the waters settle, and are not apt to heal. The angel descended, to stir the water, not daily, perhaps not frequently, but at a certain season; some think, at the three solemn feasts, to grace those solemnities; or, now and then, as Infinite Wisdom saw fit. God is a free agent in dispensing his favours.

(2.)The operation of the medicine: Whoever first stepped in was made whole. here is, [1.] miraculous extent of the virtue as to the diseases cured; what disease soever it was, this water cured it. Natural and artificial baths are as hurtful in some cases as they are useful in others, but this was a remedy for every malady, even for those that came from contrary causes. The power of miracles succeeds where the power of nature succumbs. [2.] A miraculous limitation of the virtue as to the persons cured: He that first stepped in had the benefit; that is, he or they that stepped in immediately were cured, not those that lingered and came in afterwards. This teaches us to observe and improve our opportunities, and to look about us, that we slip not a season which may never return. The angel stirred the waters, but left the diseased to themselves to get in. God has put virtue into the scriptures and ordinances, for he would have healed us; but, if we do not make a due improvement of them, it is our own fault, we would not be healed.

Now this is all the account we have of this standing miracle; it is uncertain when it began and when it ceased. Some conjecture it began when Eliashib the high priest began the building of the wall about Jerusalem, and sanctified it with prayer; and that God testified his acceptance by putting this virtue into the adjoining pool. Some think it began now lately at Christ's birth; nay, others at his baptism. Dr. Lightfoot, finding in Josephus, Antiq. 15.121-122, mention of a great earthquake in the seventh year of Herod, thirty years before Christ's birth, supposed, since there used to be earthquakes at the descent of angels, that then the angel first descended to stir this water. Some think it ceased with this miracle, others at Christ's death; however, it is certain it had a gracious signification. First, it was a token of God's good will to that people, and an indication that, though they had been long without prophets and miracles, yet God had not cast them off; though they were now an oppressed despised people, and many were ready to say, Where are all the wonders that our fathers told us of? God did hereby let them know that he had still a kindness for the city of their solemnities. We may hence take occasion to acknowledge with thankfulness God's power and goodness in the mineral waters, that contribute so much to the health of mankind; for God made the fountains of water, Rev 14:7. Secondly, It was a type of the Messiah, who is the fountain opened; and was intended to raise people's expectations of him who is the Sun of righteousness, that arises with healing under his wings. These waters had formerly been used for purifying, now for healing, to signify both the cleansing and curing virtue of the blood of Christ, that incomparable bath, which heals all our diseases. The waters of Siloam, which filled this pool, signified the kingdom of David, and of Christ the Son of David (Isa 8:6); fitly therefore have they now this sovereign virtue put into them. The laver of regeneration is to us as Bethesda's pool, healing our spiritual diseases; not at certain seasons, but at all times. Whoever will, let him come.

III.The patient on whom this cure was wrought (Joh 5:5): one that had been infirm thirty-eight years.

1.His disease was grievous: He had an infirmity, a weakness; he had lost the use of his limbs, at least on one side, as is usual in palsies. It is sad to have the body so disabled that, instead of being the soul's instrument, it is become, even in the affairs of this life, its burden. What reason have we to thank God for bodily strength, to use it for him, and to pity those who are his prisoners!

2.The duration of it was tedious: Thirty-eight years. He was lame longer than most live. Many are so long disabled for the offices of life that, as the psalmist complains, they seem to be made in vain; for suffering, not for service; born to be always dying. Shall we complain of one wearisome night, or one fit of illness, who perhaps for many years have scarcely known what it has been to be a day sick, when many others, better than we, have scarcely known what it has been to be a day well? Mr. Baxter's note on this passage is very affecting: "How great a mercy was it to live thirty-eight years under God's wholesome discipline! O my God," saith he, "I thank thee for the like discipline of fifty-eight years; how safe a life is this, in comparison of full prosperity and pleasure!"

IV.The cure and the circumstances of it briefly related, Joh 5:6-9.

1.Jesus saw him lie. Observe, When Christ came up to Jerusalem he visited not the palaces, but the hospitals, which is an instance of his humility, and condescension, and tender compassion, and an indication of his great design in coming into the world, which was to seek and save the sick and wounded. There was a great multitude of poor cripples here at Bethesda, but Christ fastened his eye upon this one, and singled him out from the rest, because he was senior of the house, and in a more deplorable condition than any of the rest; and Christ delights to help the helpless, and hath mercy on whom he will have mercy. Perhaps his companions in tribulation insulted over him, because he had often been disappointed of a cure; therefore Christ took him for his patient: it is his honour to side with the weakest, and bear up those whom he sees run down.

2.He knew and considered how long he had lain in this condition. Those that have been long in affliction may comfort themselves with this, that God keeps account how long, and knows our frame.

3.He asked him, Wilt thou be made whole? A strange question to be asked one that had been so long ill. Some indeed would not be made whole, because their sores serve them to beg by and serve them for an excuse for idleness; but this poor man was as unable to go a begging as to work, yet Christ put it to him, (1.) To express his own pity and concern for him. Christ is tenderly inquisitive concerning the desires of those that are in affliction, and is willing to know what is their petition: "What shall I do for you?" (2.) To try him whether he would be beholden for a cure to him against whom the great people were so prejudiced and sought to prejudice others. (3.) To teach him to value the mercy, and to excite in him desires after it. In spiritual cases, people are not willing to be cured of their sins, are loth to part with them. If this point therefore were but gained, if people were willing to be made whole, the work were half done, for Christ is willing to heal, if we be but willing to be healed, Mat 8:3.

4.The poor impotent man takes this opportunity to renew his complaint, and to set forth the misery of his case, which makes his cure the more illustrious: Sir, I have no man to put me into the pool, Joh 5:7. He seems to take Christ's question as an imputation of carelessness and neglect: "If thou hadst had a mind to be healed, thou wouldest have looked better to thy hits, and have got into the healing waters long before now." "No, Master," saith the poor man, "It is not for want of a good will, but of a good friend, that I am unhealed. I have done what I could to help myself, but in vain, for no one else will help me." (1.) He does not think of any other way of being cured than by these waters, and desires no other friendship than to be helped into them; therefore, when Christ cured him, his imagination or expectation could not contribute to it, for he thought of no such thing. (2.) He complains for want of friends to help him in: "I have no man, no friend to do me that kindness." One would think that some of those who had been themselves healed should have lent him a hand; but it is common for the poor to be destitute of friends; no man careth for their soul. To the sick and impotent it is as true a piece of charity to work for them as to relieve them; and thus the poor are capable of being charitable to one another, and ought to be so, though we seldom find that they are so; I speak it to their shame. (3.) He bewails his infelicity, that very often when he was coming another stepped in before him. But a step between him and a cure, and yet he continues impotent. None had the charity to say, "Your case is worse than mine, do you go in now, and I will stay till the next time;" for there is no getting over the old maxim, Every one for himself. Having been so often disappointed, he begins to despair, and now is Christ's time to come to his relief; he delights to help in desperate cases. Observe, How mildly this man speaks of the unkindness of those about him, without any peevish reflections. As we should be thankful for the least kindness, so we should be patient under the greatest contempts; and, let our resentments be ever so just, yet our expressions should ever be calm. And observe further, to his praise, that, though he had waited so long in vain, yet still he continued lying by the pool side, hoping that some time or other help would come, Hab 2:3.

5.Our Lord Jesus hereupon cures him with a word speaking, though he neither asked it nor thought of it. Here is,

(1.)The word he said: Rise, take up thy bed, Joh 5:8.

[1.]He is bidden to rise and walk; a strange command to be given to an impotent man, that had been long disabled; but this divine word was to be the vehicle of a divine power; it was a command to the disease to be gone, to nature to be strong, but it is expressed as a command to him to bestir himself. He must rise and walk, that is, attempt to do it, and in the essay he should receive strength to do it. The conversion of a sinner is the cure of a chronic disease; this is ordinarily done by the word, a word of command: Arise, and walk; turn, and live; make ye a new heart; which no more supposes a power in us to do it, without the grace of God, distinguishing grace, than this supposed such a power in the impotent man. But, if he had not attempted to help himself, he had not been cured, and he must have borne the blame; yet it does not therefore follow that, when he did rise and walk, it was by his own strength; no, it was by the power of Christ, and he must have all the glory. Observe, Christ did not bid him rise and go into the waters, but rise and walk. Christ did that for us which the law could not do, and set that aside.

[2.]He is bidden to take up his bed. First, To make it to appear that it was a perfect cure, and purely miraculous; for he did not recover strength by degrees, but from the extremity of weakness and impotency he suddenly stepped into the highest degree of bodily strength; so that he was able to carry as great a load as any porter that had been as long used to it as he had been disused. He, who this minute was not able to turn himself in his bed, the next minute was able to carry his bed. The man sick of the palsy (Mat 9:6) was bidden to go to his house, but probably this man had no house to go to, the hospital was his home; therefore he is bidden to rise and walk. Secondly, It was to proclaim the cure, and make it public; for, being the sabbath day, whoever carried a burden through the streets made himself very remarkable, and every one would enquire what was the meaning of it; thereby notice of the miracle would spread, to the honour of God. Thirdly, Christ would thus witness against the tradition of the elders, which had stretched the law of the sabbath beyond its intention; and would likewise show that he was Lord of the sabbath, and had power to make what alterations he pleased about it, and to over-rule the law. Joshua, and the host of Israel, marched about Jericho on the sabbath day, when God commanded them, so did this man carry his bed, in obedience to a command. The case may be such that it may become a work of necessity, or mercy, to carry a bed on the sabbath day; but here it was more, it was a work of piety, being designed purely for the glory of God. Fourthly, He would hereby try the faith and obedience of his patient. By carrying his bed publicly, he exposed himself to the censure of the ecclesiastical court, and was liable, at least, to be scourged in the synagogue. Now, will he run the hazard of this, in obedience to Christ? Yes, he will. Those that have been healed by Christ's word should be ruled by his word, whatever it cost them.

(2.)The efficacy of this word (Joh 5:9): a divine power went alone with it, and immediately he was made whole, took up his bed, and walked.

[1.]He felt the power of Christ's word healing him: Immediately he was made whole. What a joyful surprise was this to the poor cripple, to find himself all of a sudden so easy, so strong, so able to help himself! What a new world was he in, in an instant! Nothing is too hard for Christ to do.

[2.]He obeyed the power of Christ's word commanding him. He took up his bed and walked, and did not care who blamed him or threatened him for it. The proof of our spiritual cure is our rising and walking. Hath Christ healed our spiritual diseases? Let us go whithersoever he sends us, and take up whatever he is pleased to lay upon us, and walk before him.

V.What became of the poor man after he was cured. We are here told,

1.What passed between him and the Jews who saw him carry his bed on the sabbath day; for on that day this cure was wrought, and it was the sabbath that fell within the passover week, and therefore a high day, Joh 19:31. Christ's work was such that he needed not make any difference between sabbath days and other days, for he was always about his Father's business; but he wrought many remarkable cures on that day, perhaps to encourage his church to expect those spiritual favours from him, in their observance of the Christian sabbath, which were typified by his miraculous cures. Now here,

(1.)The Jews quarrelled with the man for carrying his bed on the sabbath day, telling him that it was not lawful, Joh 19:10. It does not appear whether they were magistrates, who had power to punish him, or common people, who could only inform against him; but thus far was commendable, that, while they knew not by what authority he did it, they were jealous for the honour of the sabbath, and could not unconcernedly see it profaned; like Nehemiah. Neh 13:17.

(2.)The man justified himself in what he did by a warrant that would bear him out, Joh 5:11. "I do not do it in contempt of the law and the sabbath, but in obedience to one who, by making me whole, has given me an undeniable proof that he is greater than either. He that could work such a miracle as to make me whole no doubt might give me such a command as to carry my bed; he that could overrule the powers of nature no doubt might overrule a positive law, especially in an instance not of the essence of the law. He that was so kind as to make me whole would not be so unkind as to bid me do what is sinful." Christ, by curing another paralytic, proved his power to forgive sin, here to give law; if his pardons are valid, his edicts are so, and his miracles prove both.

(3.)The Jews enquired further who it was that gave him this warrant (Joh 5:12): What man is that? Observe, How industriously they overlooked that which might be a ground of their faith in Christ. They enquire not, no, not for curiosity, "Who is it that made thee whole?" While they industriously caught at that which might be a ground of reflection upon Christ (What man is it who said unto thee, Take up thy bed?) they would fain subpoena the patient to be witness against his physician, and to be his betrayer. In their question, observe,

[1.]They resolve to look upon Christ as a mere man: What man is that? For, though he gave ever such convincing proofs of it, they were resolved that they would never own him to be the Son of God.

[2.]They resolve to look upon him as a bad man, and take it for granted that he who bade this man carry his bed, whatever divine commission he might produce, was certainly a delinquent, and as such they resolve to prosecute him. What man is that who durst give such orders?

(4.)The poor man was unable to give them any account of him: He wist not who he was, Joh 5:13.

[1.]Christ was unknown to him when he healed him. Probably he had heard of the name of Jesus, but had never seen him, and therefore could not tell that this was he. Note, Christ does many a good turn for those that know him not, Isa 45:4, Isa 45:5. He enlightens, strengthens, quickens, comforts us, and we wist not who he is; nor are aware how much we receive daily by his mediation. This man, being unacquainted with Christ, could not actually believe in him for a cure; but Christ knew the dispositions of his soul, and suited his favours to them, as to the blind man in a like case, Joh 9:36. Our covenant and communion with God take rise, not so much from our knowledge of him, as from his knowledge of us. We know God, or, rather, are known of him, Gal 4:9.

[2.]For the present he kept himself unknown; for as soon as he had wrought the cure he conveyed himself away, he made himself unknown (so some read it), a multitude being in that place. This is mentioned to show, either, First, How Christ conveyed himself away - by retiring into the crowd, so as not to be distinguished from a common person. He that was the chief of ten thousand often made himself one of the throng. It is sometimes the lot of those who have by their services signalized themselves to be levelled with the multitude, and overlooked. Or Secondly, Why he conveyed himself away, because there was a multitude there, and he industriously avoided both the applause of those who would admire the miracle and cry that up, and the censure of those who would censure him as a sabbath-breaker, and run him down. Those that are active for God in their generation must expect to pass through evil report and good report; and it is wisdom as much as may be to keep out of the hearing of both; lest by the one we be exalted, and by the other depressed, above measure. Christ left the miracle to commend itself, and the man on whom it was wrought to justify it.

2.What passed between him and our Lord Jesus at their next interview, Joh 5:14. Observe here,

(1.)Where Christ found him: in the temple, the place of public worship. In our attendance on public worship we may expect to meet with Christ, and improve our acquaintance with him. Observe,

[1.]Christ went to the temple. Though he had many enemies, yet he appeared in public, because there he bore his testimony to divine institutions, and had opportunity of doing good.

[2.]The man that was cured went to the temple. There Christ found him the same day, as it should seem, that he was healed; thither he straightway went, First, Because he had, by his infirmity, been so long detained thence. Perhaps he had not been there for thirty-eight years, and therefore, as soon as ever the embargo is taken off, his first visit shall be to the temple, as Hezekiah intimates his shall be (Isa 38:22): What is the sign that I shall go up to the house of the Lord? Secondly, Because he had by his recovery a good errand thither; he went up to the temple to return thanks to God for his recovery. When God has at any time restored us our health we ought to attend him with solemn praises (Psa 116:18, Psa 116:19), and the sooner the better, while the sense of the mercy is fresh. Thirdly, Because he had, by carrying his bed, seemed to put a contempt on the sabbath, he would thus show that he had an honour for it, and made conscience of sabbath-sanctification, in that on which the chief stress of it is laid, which is the public worship of God. Works of necessity and mercy are allowed; but when they are over we must go to the temple.

(2.)What he said to him. When Christ has cured us, he has not done with us; he now applies himself to the healing of his soul, and this by the word too.

[1.]He gives him a memento of his cure: Behold thou art made whole. He found himself made whole, yet Christ calls his attention to it. Behold, consider it seriously, how sudden, how strange, how cheap, how easy, the cure was: admire it; behold, and wonder: Remember it; let the impressions of it abide, and never be lost, Isa 38:9.

[2.]He gives him a caution against sin, in consideration hereof, Being made whole, sin no more. This implies that his disease was the punishment of sin; whether of some remarkably flagrant sin, or only of sin in general, we cannot tell, but we know that sin is the procuring cause of sickness, Psa 107:17, Psa 107:18. Some observe that Christ did not make mention of sin to any of his patients, except to this impotent man, and another who was in like manner diseased, Mar 2:5. While those chronical diseases lasted, they prevented the outward acts of many sins, and therefore watchfulness was the more necessary when the disability was removed. Christ intimates that those who are made whole, who are eased of the present sensible punishment of sin, are in danger of returning to sin when the terror and restraint are over, unless divine grace dry up the fountain. When the trouble which only dammed up the current is over, the waters will return to their old course; and therefore there is great need of watchfulness, lest after healing mercy we return again to folly. The misery we were made whole from warns us to sin no more, having felt the smart of sin; the mercy we were made whole by is an engagement upon us not to offend him who healed us. This is the voice of every providence, Go and sin no more. This man began his new life very hopefully in the temple, yet Christ saw it necessary to give him this caution; for it is common for people, when they are sick, to promise much, when newly recovered to perform something, but after awhile to forget all.

[3.]He gives him warning of his danger, in case he should return to his former sinful course: Lest a worse thing come to thee. Christ, who knows all men's hearts, knew that he was one of those that must be frightened from sin. Thirty-eight years' lameness, one would think, was a thing bad enough; yet there is something worse that will come to him if he relapse into sin after God has given him such a deliverance as this, Ezr 9:13, Ezr 9:14. The hospital where he lay was a melancholy place, but hell is much more so: the doom of apostates is a worse thing than thirty-eight years' lameness.

VI.Now, after this interview between Christ and his patient, observe in the two following verses,

1.The notice which the poor simple man gave to the Jews concerning Christ, Joh 5:15. He told them it was Jesus that had made him whole. We have reason to think that he intended this for the honour of Christ and the benefit of the Jews, little thinking that he who had so much power and goodness could have any enemies; but those who wish well to Christ's kingdom must have the wisdom of the serpent, lest they do more hurt than good with their zeal, and must not cast pearls before swine.

2.The rage and enmity of the Jews against him: Therefore did the rulers of the Jews persecute Jesus. See,

(1.)How absurd and unreasonable their enmity to Christ was. Therefore, because he had made a poor sick man well, and so eased the public charge, upon which, it is likely, he had subsisted; therefore they persecuted him, because he did good in Israel.

(2.)How bloody and cruel it was: They sought to slay him; nothing less than his blood, his life, would satisfy them.

(3.)How it was varnished over with a colour of zeal for the honour of the sabbath; for this was the pretended crime, Because he had done these things on the sabbath day, as if that circumstance were enough to vitiate the best and most divine actions, and to render him obnoxious whose deeds were otherwise most meritorious. Thus hypocrites often cover their real enmity against the power of godliness with a pretended zeal for the form of it.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

5 quotes · AD 202–444
Ante-NicenePost-Nicene
200300400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 202IrenaeusAnte-NiceneSourceAGAINST HERESIES 4.12.1
The Jewish elders were unwilling to be subject to the law of God, which was to prepare them for the coming of Christ. But they even blamed the Lord for healing on the Sabbath days, which the law did not prohibit. For they did themselves, in one sense, perform acts of healing upon the Sabbath day, when they circumcised a man [on that day]. But they did not blame themselves for transgressing the command of God through tradition and the previously mentioned pharisaical law. Nor did they condemn themselves for not keeping the commandment of the law, which is the love of God.
The Jews persecuted the Lord Jesus because He did these things on the Sabbath-day. Let us hear what answer the Lord now made to the Jews. I have told you how He is wont to answer concerning the healing of men on the Sabbath-day, that they used not on the Sabbath-day to slight their cattle, either in delivering or in feeding them. What does He answer concerning the carrying of the bed? A manifest corporal work was done before the eyes of the Jews; not a healing of the body, but a bodily work, which appeared not so necessary as the healing. Let the Lord, then, openly declare that the sacrament of the Sabbath, even the sign of keeping one day, was given to the Jews for a time, but that the fulfillment of the sacrament had come in Himself.
AD 430Augustine of Hippoas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Tr. xvii. c. 13) This announcement enraged them, And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, because He had done these things on the sabbath day. A plain bodily work had been done before their eyes, distinct from the healing of the man's body, and which could not have been necessary, even if healing was; viz. the carrying of the bed. Wherefore our Lord openly says, that the sacrament of the Sabbath, the sign of observing one day out of seven, was only a temporary institution, which had attained its fulfilment in Him: But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work: as if He said, Do not suppose that My Father rested on the Sabbath in such a sense, as that from that time forth, He has ceased from working; for He worketh up to this time, though without labour, and so work I. God's resting means only that He made no other creature, after the creation. The Scripture calls it rest, to remind us of the rest we shall enjoy after a life of good works here. And as God only when He had made man in His own image and similitude, and finished all His works, and seen that they were very good, rested on the seventh day: so do thou expect no rest, except thou return to the likeness in which thou wert made, but which thou hast lost by sin; i. e. unless thou doest good works.

(iv. Super Gen. ad litteram [c. xi.]) It may be said then, that the observance of the sabbath was imposed on the Jews, as the shadow of something to come; viz. that spiritual rest, which God, by the figure of His own rest promised to all who should perform good works.

There will be a sabbath of the world, when the six ages, i. e. the six days, as it were, of the world, have passed: then will come that rest which is promised to the saints.

(iv. Gen. ad lit. c. xi.) The mystery of which rest the Lord Jesus Himself scaled by His burial: for He rested in His sepulchre on the sabbath, having on the sixth day finished all His work, inasmuch as He said, It is finished. (c. 19) What wonder then that God, to prefigure the day on which Christ was to rest in the grave, rested one day from His works, afterwards to carry on the work of governing the world. We may consider too that God, when He rested, rested from the work of creation simply, i. e. made no more new kinds of creatures: but that from that time till now, He has been carrying on the government of those creatures. For His power, as respects the government of heaven and earth, and all the things that He had made, did not cease on the seventh day: they would have perished immediately, without His government: because the power of the Creator is that on which the existence of every creature depends. If it ceased to govern, every species of creation would cease to exist: and all nature would go to nothing. For the world is not like a building, which stands after the architect has left it; it could not stand the twinkling of an eye, if God withdrew His governing hand. Therefore when our Lord says, My Father worketh hitherto, he means the continuation of the work; the holding together, and governing of the creation. It might have been different, had He said, Worketh even now. This would not have conveyed the sense of continuing. As it is we find it, Until now; i. e. from the time of the creation downwards.

(Tr. xvii. s. 15) He says then, as it were, to the Jews, Why think ye that I should not work on the sabbath? The sabbath day was instituted as a typed of Me. Ye observe the works of God: by Me all things were made. The Father made light, but He spoke, that it might be made. If He spoke, then He made it by the Word; and I am His Word. My Father worked when He made the world, and He worketh until now, governing the world: and as He made the world by Me, when He made it, so He governs it, by Me, now He governs it.

(Tr. xvii. s. 16) i. e. not in the secondary sense in which it is true of all of us, but as implying equality. For we all of us say to God, Our Father, Which art in heaven. (Matt. 6) And the Jews say, Thou art our Father. (Isaiah 63:16) They were not angry then because He called God His Father, but because He called Him so in a sense different from men.

(de Con. Ev. l. iv. c. x) The words, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work, suppose Him to be equal to the Father. This being understood, it followed from the Father's working, that the Son worked: inasmuch as the Father cloth nothing without the Son.

(Tr. xvii. s. 16) So, the Jews understood what the Arians do not. For the Arians say that the Son is not equal to the Father, and hence sprang up that heresy which afflicts the Church.

(Tr. xvii. s. 16) The Jews however did not understand from our Lord that He was the Son of God, but only that He was equal with God; though Christ gave this as the result of His being the Son of God. It is from not seeing this, while they saw at the same time that equality was asserted, that they charged Him with making Himself equal with God: the truth being, that He did not make Himself equal, but the Father had begotten Him equal.
The narrative does not herein contain the simple relation of the madness of the Jews: for the Evangelist does not show only that they persecute Him, but why they blush not to do this, saying most emphatically, Because He was doing these things on the sabbath day. For they persecute Him foolishly and blasphemously, as though the law forbad to do good on the sabbath day, as though it were not lawful to pity and compassionate the sick, as though it behoved to put off the law of love, the praise of brotherly kindness, the grace of gentleness: and what of good things may one not show that the Jews did in manifold ways spurn, not knowing the aim of the Lawgiver respecting the Sabbath, and making the observance of it most empty? For as Christ Himself somewhere said, each one of them taketh his ox, or his sheep, and leadeth them away to watering, and that a man on the sabbath day receiveth circumcision, that the law of Moses be not broken: and then they are angry, because He made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day, by reason of the exceeding stubbornness alike and undisciplinedness of their habits, not even to brutes preferring him that is made in the Divine Image, but thinking that one ought to pity a sheep on the sabbath day, and unblamed to free it from famine and thirst, yet that they are open to the charge of transgressing the law to the last degree, who are gentle and good to their neighbour on the sabbath?

But that we may see that they were beyond measure senseless, and therefore with justice deserve to hear, Ye do err, not knowing the Scriptures; come let us taking somewhat from the Divine Scriptures too show clearly, that Jesus was long ago foredepicted as in a type taking no account of the sabbath. The all-wise Moses then, having at a great age (as it is written) departed from things of men and been removed to the mansions above, by the judgment and decree of God That ruleth all, Joshua the son of Nun obtained and inherited the command over Israel. When he therefore, having set in array heavy armed soldiers ten thousand strong round about Jericho, was devising to take at length and overthrow it, he arranged with the Levites to take the ark round about for six whole days, but on the seventh day, that is, the Sabbath, he commanded the innumerable multitude of the host to shout along with the trumpets, and thus the wall was thrown down, and they rushing in, took the city, not observing the unseasonable rest of the Sabbath, nor refusing their victory thereon, by reason of the law restraining them, nor yet did they then withstand the generalship of Joshua, but wholly free from reproach did they keep the command of the man. And herein is the type: but when the Truth came, that is Christ, Who destroyed and overcame the corruption set up against man's nature by the devil, and is seen doing this on the Sabbath, as in preface and commencement of action, in the case of the paralytic, they foolishly take it ill, and condemn the obedience of their fathers, not suffering nature to conquer on the sabbath day the despite done it by sickness, to such extent as to be zealous in persecuting Jesus Who was working good on the sabbath day.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying John 5:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8