Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the Pharisees went forth, and straightway took counsel with the Herodians against him, how they might destroy him.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 the Pharisees G5330 went forth G1831, and straightway G2112 took G4160 counsel G4824 with G3326 the Herodians G2265 against G2596 him G846, how G3704 they might destroy G622 him G846.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The P'rushim went out and immediately began plotting with some members of Herod's party how to do away with him.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
At this, the Pharisees went out and began plotting with the Herodians how they might kill Jesus.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the Pharisees went out, and straightway with the Herodians took counsel against him, how they might destroy him.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The Pharisees went out, and immediately conspired with the Herodians against him, how they might destroy him.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the Pharises departed, and straightway gathered a councill with the Herodians against him, that they might destroy him.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and the Pharisees having gone forth, immediately, with the Herodians, were taking counsel against him how they might destroy him.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 24,295 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Mark 3:6 records a chilling escalation in the opposition to Jesus's ministry, revealing that immediately after Jesus healed a man on the Sabbath, the religious Pharisees, in an unprecedented move, allied with the political Herodians to conspire against Him, seeking a way to put Him to death. This verse marks a critical turning point where the conflict shifts from theological debate to a deadly plot, highlighting the profound threat Jesus posed to the established religious and political order.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse immediately follows Jesus's deliberate act of healing a man with a withered hand in the synagogue on the Sabbath, as detailed in Mark 3:1-5. Jesus had entered the synagogue, observed the man, and, knowing He was being watched by the Pharisees, challenged their rigid interpretation of Sabbath law by asking if it was lawful to do good or evil, to save life or to kill, on the Sabbath. Their stony silence and hardened hearts prompted Jesus's deep grief and anger, after which He commanded the man to stretch out his hand and healed him. Mark 3:6 is the immediate, visceral reaction of the religious establishment to this powerful demonstration of divine authority and compassion that directly contradicted their legalistic traditions.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Pharisees were a prominent Jewish religious sect known for their strict adherence to the Mosaic Law and their extensive oral traditions, which they considered equally binding. They emphasized ritual purity, tithing, and Sabbath observance, often to the point of legalism. The Herodians, on the other hand, were a political faction loyal to the Herodian dynasty, particularly Herod Antipas, the tetrarch of Galilee and Perea. They were generally pro-Roman and held significant political influence, often clashing with the more nationalistic and religiously conservative Pharisees. The alliance between these two groups was highly unusual and politically expedient, signifying the extreme level of perceived threat Jesus represented to both their religious authority and political stability. Their shared animosity towards Jesus transcended their deep-seated ideological differences.
  • Key Themes: Mark 3:6 powerfully contributes to several key themes within Mark's Gospel. Firstly, it underscores the escalating opposition to Jesus, moving from mere questioning and criticism (e.g., Mark 2:1-12, Mark 2:18-22, Mark 2:23-28) to outright conspiracy and murderous intent. Secondly, it highlights the unlikely alliances that form against God's purposes, demonstrating how disparate groups can unite against a common perceived enemy, in this case, the embodiment of divine truth and grace. Thirdly, it exposes the profound spiritual blindness and hypocrisy of religious leaders who, under the guise of upholding God's law, were willing to plot murder on the very day they claimed to honor as holy. This verse sets a dark tone, foreshadowing the ultimate rejection and crucifixion of Jesus, a central theme in Mark's narrative of the suffering Messiah (e.g., Mark 8:31).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • straightway (Greek, euthéōs, G2112): This adverb emphasizes the immediacy and urgency of the Pharisees' reaction. It signifies that their decision to conspire against Jesus was not a delayed or carefully considered one, but an instantaneous response born of intense anger and fear following Jesus's Sabbath healing. Mark frequently uses this term to convey the rapid pace and decisive nature of events in Jesus's ministry.
  • Herodians (Greek, Hērōdianoí, G2265): This term refers to the political partisans of the Herodian dynasty. Their inclusion in this conspiracy is highly significant because they were typically at odds with the religiously zealous Pharisees. Their alliance underscores the profound and multifaceted threat Jesus posed, uniting even disparate factions in their opposition to Him, indicating a political as well as religious concern.
  • destroy (Greek, apóllymi, G622): This verb means "to destroy fully," "to perish," or "to lose." In this context, it unequivocally signifies their intent to kill Jesus. It reveals the ultimate goal of their counsel: not merely to silence or discredit Him, but to utterly eliminate Him. This word choice highlights the severity and murderous intent behind their plotting.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the Pharisees went forth,": This indicates that the Pharisees, having been present in the synagogue and witnessing Jesus's healing on the Sabbath, immediately departed from that setting. Their "going forth" suggests a deliberate and purposeful exit, likely to a private place where they could discuss and plan without interruption. It marks their transition from passive observation and silent judgment to active plotting.
  • "and straightway took counsel with the Herodians against him,": The term "straightway" (euthéōs) emphasizes the swiftness of their action, indicating their intense anger and alarm. The act of "taking counsel" (symboúlion poiéō) signifies a formal deliberation or conspiracy. The shocking element here is their alliance with the Herodians, a political group with whom they had little in common and often opposed. This unprecedented collaboration underscores the extreme nature of their animosity towards Jesus, as He was perceived as a threat to both religious authority and political stability. The phrase "against him" explicitly states the target of their malicious plotting.
  • "how they might destroy him.": This clause reveals the sinister purpose of their counsel. The verb "destroy" (apóllymi) in this context means to kill or utterly ruin. It leaves no doubt about their murderous intent. This marks a significant escalation in the opposition to Jesus, moving beyond mere theological disputes or challenges to His authority, to a direct plot against His life. It foreshadows the ultimate outcome of their escalating hostility.

Literary Devices

Mark 3:6 effectively employs several literary devices to convey the gravity of the situation. Juxtaposition is evident in the stark contrast between Jesus's compassionate act of healing on the Sabbath and the immediate, murderous intent of the religious leaders. This highlights their spiritual blindness and hardened hearts. The verse also utilizes Foreshadowing, as this early conspiracy to "destroy him" clearly anticipates the eventual plot that leads to Jesus's crucifixion, setting a tone of escalating conflict throughout the Gospel. Furthermore, there is profound Irony in the fact that the very individuals who meticulously observed the Sabbath law, ostensibly to honor God, were willing to violate the sanctity of life by plotting murder on that same holy day. This exposes the hypocrisy of their legalism.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Mark 3:6 is a pivotal moment that highlights the inherent conflict between the Kingdom of God, as embodied by Jesus, and the established human systems, particularly those rooted in legalism and self-preservation. It reveals the depth of human sin and resistance to divine truth, even when manifested through compassion and miraculous power. The alliance between the Pharisees and Herodians, despite their profound differences, underscores how opposition to Christ can unite disparate forces, demonstrating a spiritual battle against the light. This verse serves as a stark reminder that genuine righteousness and divine authority often provoke hostility from those who prioritize tradition, power, or human systems over God's revealed will and the well-being of humanity.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Mark 3:6 serves as a sobering reminder that living faithfully for Christ and embodying His compassion can provoke intense opposition, even from unexpected sources. It challenges believers to examine their own hearts for any legalistic tendencies or self-righteousness that might blind them to God's true heart and purpose. Just as Jesus's actions exposed the spiritual blindness of the religious leaders, our commitment to truth and love may expose the darkness in the world around us. This verse calls us to courage and discernment, recognizing that spiritual battles are real and that God's purposes will ultimately prevail, even through the darkest conspiracies. We are reminded that true faith is not about rigid adherence to human traditions, but about a living relationship with God that manifests in compassion, justice, and obedience to His Spirit.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the swift and severe reaction of the Pharisees and Herodians challenge my assumptions about religious devotion and political power?
  • In what ways might my own traditions or comfort zones prevent me from embracing radical compassion or divine truth?
  • What lessons can I draw from Jesus's steadfastness in the face of such intense and immediate opposition?
  • How can I ensure that my faith is centered on God's heart of love and mercy, rather than on rigid rules or self-serving agendas?

FAQ

Why did the Pharisees and Herodians, who were typically enemies, unite against Jesus?

Answer: The alliance between the Pharisees and the Herodians was indeed highly unusual, as they represented opposing religious and political ideologies. The Pharisees were strict religious conservatives focused on Jewish law and tradition, while the Herodians were a political party loyal to the Roman-backed Herodian dynasty. Their unity against Jesus in Mark 3:6 highlights the profound and multifaceted threat Jesus posed to both their spheres of influence. For the Pharisees, Jesus's disregard for their oral traditions (especially regarding the Sabbath, as seen in Mark 3:1-5) and His growing popularity undermined their religious authority. For the Herodians, Jesus's burgeoning movement and claims of a new kingdom (even if spiritual) could be perceived as a potential political uprising that might destabilize their rule or provoke Roman intervention. Thus, their shared fear and desire to maintain their respective power structures created an "enemy of my enemy is my friend" scenario, uniting them in their common goal to eliminate Jesus.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Mark 3:6, with its chilling depiction of the Pharisees and Herodians conspiring to destroy Jesus, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate fulfillment of God's redemptive plan through the crucifixion. While their intent was malicious, their actions unwittingly served the sovereign purposes of God. The plotting to "destroy him" points directly to the Lamb of God, who was "led as a sheep to the slaughter" (Isaiah 53:7), whose life would be given as a ransom for many (Mark 10:45). The very opposition Jesus faced, culminating in His death, was not a defeat but the means by which He would secure victory over sin and death, establishing His eternal kingdom. The conspiracy in this verse, therefore, is a dark but necessary step towards the glorious truth that "God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life" (John 3:16). Jesus's steadfastness in the face of this early plot demonstrates His unwavering commitment to His mission, knowing that His suffering was integral to His role as the Messiah who would ultimately conquer through sacrifice, fulfilling the ancient prophecies concerning the suffering servant and the triumphant King.

Copy as

Commentary on Mark 3 verses 1–12

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here, as before, we have our Lord Jesus busy at work in the synagogue first, and then by the sea side; to teach us that his presence should not be confined either to the one or to the other, but, wherever any are gathered together in his name, whether in the synagogue or any where else, there is he in the midst of them. In every place where he records his name, he will meet his people, and bless them; it is his will that men pray every where. Now here we have some account of what he did.

I. When he entered again into the synagogue, he improved the opportunity he had there, of doing good, and having, no doubt, preached a sermon there, he wrought a miracle for the confirmation of it, or at least for the confirmation of this truth - that it is lawful to do good on the sabbath day. We had the narrative, Mat 12:9.

1.The patient's case was piteous; he had a withered hand, by which he was disabled to work for his living; and those that are so, are the most proper objects of charity; let those be helped that cannot help themselves.

2.The spectators were very unkind, both to the patient and to the Physician; instead of interceding for a poor neighbour, they did what they could to hinder his cure: for they intimated that if Christ cured him now on the sabbath day, they would accuse him as a Sabbath breaker. It had been very unreasonable, if they should have opposed a physician or surgeon in helping any poor body in misery, by ordinary methods; but much more absurd was it to oppose him that cured without any labour, but by a word's speaking.

3.Christ dealt very fairly with the spectators, and dealt with them first, if possible to prevent the offence.

(1.)He laboured to convince their judgment. He bade the man stand forth (Mar 3:3), that by the sight of him they might be moved with compassion toward him, and might not, for shame, account his cure a crime. And then he appeals to their own consciences; though the thing speaks itself, yet he is pleased to speak it; "Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath days, as I design to do, or to do evil, as you design to do? Whether is better, to save life or to kill?" What fairer question could be put? And yet, because they saw it would turn against them, they held their peace. Note, Those are obstinate indeed in their infidelity, who, when they can say nothing against a truth, will say nothing to it; and, when they cannot resist, yet will not yield.

(2.)When they rebelled against the light, he lamented their stubbornness (Mar 3:5); He looked round about on them with anger, being grieved for the hardness of their hearts. The sin he had an eye to, was, the hardness of their hearts, their insensibleness of the evidence of his miracles, and their inflexible resolution to persist in unbelief. We hear what is said amiss, and see what is done amiss; but Christ looks at the root of bitterness in the heart, the blindness and hardness of that. Observe, [1.] How he was provoked by the sin; he looked round upon them; for they were so many, and had so placed themselves, that they surrounded him: and he looked with anger; his anger, it is probable, appeared in his countenance; his anger was, like God's, without the least perturbation to himself, but not without great provocation from us. Note, The sin of sinners is very displeasing to Jesus Christ; and the way to be angry, and not to sin, is it be angry, as Christ was, at nothing but sin. Let hard-hearted sinners tremble to think of the anger with which he will look round upon them shortly, when the great day of his wrath comes. [2.] How he pitied the sinners; he was grieved for the hardness of their hearts; as God was grieved forty years for the hardness of the hearts of their fathers in the wilderness. Note, It is a great grief to our Lord Jesus, to see sinners bent upon their own ruin, and obstinately set against the methods of their conviction and recovery, for he would not that any should perish. This is a good reason why the hardness of our own hearts and of the hearts of others, should be a grief to us.

4.Christ dealt very kindly with the patient; he bade him stretch forth his hand, and it was immediately restored. Now, (1.) Christ has hereby taught us to go on with resolution in the way of our duty, how violent soever the opposition is, that we meet with in it. We must deny ourselves sometimes in our ease, pleasure, and convenience, rather than give offence even to those who causelessly take it; but we must not deny ourselves the satisfaction of serving God, and doing good, though offence may unjustly be taken at it. None could be more tender of giving offence than Christ; yet, rather than send this poor man away uncured, he would venture offending all the scribes and Pharisees that compassed him about. (2.) He hath hereby given us a specimen of the cures wrought by his grace upon poor souls; our hands are spiritually withered, the powers of our souls weakened by sin, and disabled for that which is good. The great healing day is the sabbath, and the healing place the synagogue; the healing power is that of Christ. The gospel command is like this recorded here; and the command is rational and just; though our hands are withered, and we cannot of ourselves stretch them forth, we must attempt it, must, as well as we can, lift them up to God in prayer, lay hold on Christ and eternal life, and employ them in good works; and if we do our endeavour, power goes along with the word of Christ, he effects the cure. Though our hands be withered, yet, if we will not offer to stretch them out, it is our own fault that we are not healed; but if we do, and are healed, Christ and his power and grace must have all the glory.

5.The enemies of Christ dealt very barbarously with him. Such a work of mercy should have engaged their love to him, and such a work of wonder their faith in him. But, instead of that, the Pharisees, who pretended to be oracles in the church, and the Herodians, who pretended to be the supporters of the state, though of opposite interests one to another, took counsel together against him, how they might destroy him. Note, They that suffer for doing good, do but suffer as their Master did.

II. When he withdrew to the sea, he did good there. While his enemies sought to destroy him, he quitted the place; to teach us in troublous times to shift for our own safety; but see here,

1.How he was followed into his retirement. When some had such an enmity to him, that they drove him out of their country, others had such a value for him, that they followed him wherever he went; and the enmity of their leaders to Christ did not cool their respect to him. Great multitudes followed him from all parts of the nation; as far north, as from Galilee; as far south, as from Judea and Jerusalem; nay, and from Idumea; as far east, as from beyond Jordan; and west, as from about Tyre and Sidon, Mar 3:7, Mar 3:8. Observe, (1.) What induced them to follow him; it was the report they heard of the great things he did for all that applied themselves to him; some wished to see one that had done such great things, and others hoped he would do great things for them. Note, The consideration of the great things Christ has done, should engage us to come to him. (2.) What they followed him for (Mar 3:10); They pressed upon him, to touch him, as many as had plagues. Diseases are here called plagues, mastigas - corrections, chastisements; so they are designed to be, to make us smart for our sins, that thereby we may be made sorry for them, and may be warned not to return to them. Those that were under these scourgings came to Jesus; this is the errand on which sickness is sent, to quicken us to enquire after Christ, and apply ourselves to him as our Physician. They pressed upon him, each striving which should get nearest to him, and which should be first served. They fell down before him (so Dr. Hammond), as petitioners for his favour; they desired leave but to touch him, having faith to be healed, not only by his touching them, but by their touching him; which no doubt they had many instances of. (3.) What provision he made to be ready to attend them (Mar 3:9); He spoke to his disciples, who were fishermen, and had fisher-boats at command, that a small ship should constantly wait on him, to carry him from place to place on the same coast; that, when he had despatched the necessary business he had to do in one place, he might easily remove to another, where his presence was requisite, without pressing through the crowds of people that followed him for curiosity. Wise men, as much as they can, decline a crowd.

2.What abundance of good he did in his retirement. He did not withdraw to be idle, nor did he send back those who rudely crowded after him when he withdrew, but took it kindly, and gave them what they came for; for he never said to any that sought him diligently, Seek ye me in vain. (1.) Diseases were effectually cured; He healed many; divers sorts of patients, ill of divers sorts of diseases; though numerous, though various, he healed them. (2.) Devils were effectually conquered; those whom unclean spirits had got possession of, when they saw him, trembled at his presence, and they also fell down before him, not to supplicate his favour, but to deprecate his wrath, and by their own terrors were compelled to own that he was the Son of God, Mar 3:11. It is sad that this great truth should be denied by any of the children of men, who may have the benefit of it, when a confession of it has so often been extorted from devils, who are excluded from having benefit by it. (3.) Christ sought not applause to himself in doing those great things, for he strictly charged those for whom he did them, that they should not make him known (Mar 3:12); that they should not be industrious to spread the notice of his cures, as it were by advertisements in the newspapers, but let them leave his own works to praise him, and let the report of them diffuse itself, and make its own way. Let not those that are cured, be forward to divulge it, lest it should feed their pride who are so highly favoured; but let the standers-by carry away the intelligence of it. When we do that which is praiseworthy, and yet covet not to be praised of men for it, then the same mind is in us, which was in Christ Jesus.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–12. Public domain.
Copy as
BedeAD 735
On the Gospel of Mark
But the Pharisees went out and immediately took counsel with the Herodians against him, how to destroy him. He refers to the Herodians as the ministers of Herod the tetrarch, who, on account of the enmity which their lord exercised against John, also plotted against and hated the Savior whom John preached. However, it was of great foolishness for those who greatly needed salvation to take counsel about the death of the Savior. Their zeal for wickedness is shown when they even consider it a crime that he stretched out the hand of the one who was sick to heal it at his word, as if none of them had ever done greater works on the Sabbath, such as carrying food, offering a cup, and performing other necessary tasks for sustenance. For indeed, he who said "Let there be," and it was made, could not be convicted of working on the Sabbath.
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(in Marc. i. 15) The Pharisees, thinking it a crime that at the word of the Lord the hand which was diseased was restored to a sound state, agreed to make a pretext of the words spoken by our Saviour; wherefore it is said, And the Pharisees went forth, and straightway took counsel with the Herodians against him, how they might destroy him. As if every one amongst them did not greater things on the sabbath day, carrying food, reaching forth a cup, and whatever else is necessary for meals. Neither could He, Who said and it was done, be convicted of toiling on the sabbath day.

(ubi sup.) Or else he calls Herodians the servants of Herod the Tetrarch, who on account of the hatred which their lord had for John, pursued with treachery and hate the Saviour also, Whom John preached. It goes on, But Jesus withdrew himself with his disciples to the sea; He fled from their treachery, because the hour of His passion had not yet come, and no place away from Jerusalem was proper for His Passion. By which also He gave an example to His disciples, when they suffer persecution in one city, to flee to another.

(ubi sup.) For the strangers followed Him, because they saw the works of His powers, and in order to hear the words or His teaching. But the Jews, induced solely by their opinion of His powers, in a vast multitude come to hear Him, and to beg for His aiding health; wherefore there follows, And he spake to his disciples, that they should wait, &c.

(ubi sup.) Both therefore fell down before the Lord, those who had the plagues of bodily diseases, and those who were vexed by unclean spirits. The sick did this simply with the intention of obtaining health, but the demoniacs, or rather the devils within them, because under the mastery of a fear of God they were compelled not only to fall down before Him, but also to praise His majesty; wherefore it goes on, And they cried out, saying, Thou art the Son of God. And here we must wonder at the blindness of the Arians, who, after the glory of His resurrection, deny the Son of God, Whom the devils confess to be the Son of God, though still clothed with human flesh. There follows, And he straitly charged them, that they should not make him known. (Ps. 50:16) For God said to the sinner, Why dost thou preach my laws? A sinner is forbidden to preach the Lord, lest any one listening to his preaching should follow him in his error, for the devil is an evil master, who always mingles false things with true, that the semblance of truth may cover the witness of fraud. But not only devils, but persons healed by Christ, and even Apostles, are ordered to be silent concerning Him before the Passion, lest by the preaching of the majesty of His Divinity, the economy of His Passion should be retarded. But allegorically, in the Lord's coming out of the synagogue, and then retiring to the sea, He prefigured the salvation of the Gentiles, to whom He deigned to come through their faith, having quitted the Jews on account of their perfidy. For the nations, driven about in divers by-paths of error, are fitly compared to the unstable sea. (v. Cyprian. Ep. lxiii. Aug. de Civ. Dei, 20, 16.) Again, a great crowd from various provinces followed Him, because He has received with kindness many nations, who came to Him through the preaching of the Apostles. But the ship waiting upon the Lord in the sea is the Church, collected from amongst the nations; and He goes into it lest the crowd should throng Him, because flying from the troubled minds of carnal persons, He delights to come to those who despise the glory of this world, and to dwell within them. Further, there is a difference between thronging the Lord, and touching Him; for they throng Him, when by carnal thoughts and deeds they trouble peace, in which truth dwells; but he touches Him, who by faith and love has received Him into his heart; wherefore those who touched Him are said to have been saved.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
But the soldiers of Herod the king are called Herodians, because a certain new heresy had sprung up, which asserted that Herod was the Christ. For the prophecy of Jacob intimated, that when the princes of Judah failed, then Christ should come; because therefore in the time of Herod none of the Jewish princes remained, and he, an alien, was the sole ruler, some thought that he was the Christ, and set on foot this heresy. These, therefore, were with the Pharisees trying to kill Christ.

At the same time again, He goes away, that by quitting the ungrateful He might do good to more, for many followed him, and he healed them. For there follows, And a great multitude from Galilee, &c. Syrians and Sidonians, being foreigners, receive benefit from Christ; but His kindred the Jews persecute Him: thus there is no profit in relationship, if there be not a similarity in goodness.

Consider then how He hid His glory, for He begs for a little ship, lest the crowd should hurt Him, so that entering into it, He might remain unharmed. It follows, As many as had scourges, &c. But he means by scourges, diseases, for God scourges us, as a father does His children.

Morally again, the Herodians, that is, persons who love the lusts of the flesh, wish to slay Christ. For the meaning of Herod is, 'of skin.' (pelliceus. v. Hier. de Nom. Hebr) But those who quit their country, that is, a carnal mode of living, follow Christ, and their plagues are healed, that is, the sins which wound their conscience. But Jesus in us is our reason, which commands that our vessel, that is, our body, should serve Him, lest the troubles of worldly affairs should press upon our reason.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Mark 3:6 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.