Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And they were filled with madness; and communed one with another what they might do to Jesus.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 they G846 were filled G4130 with madness G454; and G2532 communed G1255 one with another G4314 G240 what G5101 G302 they might do G4160 to Jesus G2424.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
But the others were filled with fury and began discussing with each other what they could do to Yeshua.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But the scribes and Pharisees were filled with rage and began to discuss with one another what they might do to Jesus.
Ask
American Standard Version
But they were filled with madness; and communed one with another what they might do to Jesus.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
But they were filled with rage, and talked with one another about what they might do to Yeshua.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then they were filled full of madnes, and communed one with another, what they might doe to Iesus.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and they were filled with madness, and were speaking with one another what they might do to Jesus.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Levant)
All Luke Sites (Levant) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 25,158 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Luke 6:11 captures the escalating hostility of the religious leaders towards Jesus following His compassionate healing of a man with a withered hand on the Sabbath. Their inability to refute His actions or arguments, coupled with His undeniable authority and challenge to their legalistic traditions, ignited a furious rage within them. This verse marks a pivotal moment where their opposition transitioned from mere observation and questioning to active, malevolent plotting against His life.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse immediately follows a confrontational Sabbath encounter in the synagogue where Jesus healed a man with a withered hand. The preceding verses (Luke 6:6-10) detail how the scribes and Pharisees were intently watching Jesus, seeking an accusation against Him for healing on the Sabbath. Jesus, aware of their thoughts, challenged them with a question designed to expose their hypocrisy: "Is it lawful on the sabbath to do good, or to do evil? to save life, or to destroy it?" Luke 6:9. When they remained silent, He healed the man, demonstrating His authority and compassion. Luke 6:11 then describes the religious leaders' furious reaction to this act, which directly contradicted their rigid interpretations of the Sabbath law and exposed their lack of genuine concern for human suffering. This incident is paralleled in Matthew 12:9-14 and Mark 3:1-6.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Sabbath was a foundational pillar of Jewish life, commemorating God's rest after creation Genesis 2:2-3 and Israel's deliverance from slavery Deuteronomy 5:12-15. By Jesus' time, however, rabbinic traditions had developed an intricate system of prohibitions and regulations surrounding the Sabbath, often overshadowing its original intent of rest and worship. The Pharisees, a prominent Jewish sect, were zealous in their adherence to these oral traditions, viewing any perceived violation as a grave offense. Healing was generally considered "work" unless life was in immediate danger. Jesus' healing of a non-life-threatening condition on the Sabbath, therefore, was seen by them as a deliberate transgression of their established legal framework, challenging their authority and interpretation of the Mosaic Law. Their "madness" reflects not just anger, but a deep-seated fear of losing control and influence over the people.
  • Key Themes: This passage powerfully illustrates several key themes prevalent throughout Luke's Gospel and the broader narrative of Jesus' ministry. It highlights the stark conflict between divine compassion and human legalism, where Jesus consistently prioritizes human need and God's merciful intent over rigid adherence to man-made rules. The Pharisees' reaction underscores the escalating opposition to Jesus, revealing how His truth and authority threatened the established religious order, foreshadowing the ultimate plot against His life Luke 22:1-6. Furthermore, it emphasizes the nature of true righteousness, contrasting the Pharisees' outward observance with Jesus' inward righteousness that flows from love and seeks to give life, rather than to preserve tradition at the expense of human flourishing, a theme explored in passages like Luke 11:37-54.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • filled (Greek, plḗthō', G4130): This verb signifies being "filled" or "accomplished," often used in the New Testament to describe being filled with the Holy Spirit or fulfilling a prophecy. Here, it describes the complete saturation of the religious leaders with "madness." It's not a fleeting emotion but a consuming state, indicating that this rage has taken full possession of them.
  • madness (Greek, ánoia', G454): Derived from a negative particle and the word for "mind" (nous), ánoia literally means "no mind" or "lack of understanding." It denotes stupidity, senselessness, or folly. By implication, it can also refer to rage or fury that stems from such irrationality. In this context, it describes an irrational, unthinking fury that has consumed the religious leaders, blinding them to reason, compassion, and the divine power at work.
  • communed (Greek, dialaléō', G1255): This word means "to talk throughout a company," "to converse," or "to publish." Here, it describes the act of the religious leaders conferring with one another. It suggests a serious, perhaps conspiratorial, discussion among them, indicating that their "madness" was not merely an internal feeling but immediately led to collaborative plotting.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And they were filled with madness": This clause describes the profound emotional state of the scribes and Pharisees. The healing of the man with the withered hand, performed by Jesus on the Sabbath, provoked an intense, irrational fury within them. This "madness" (ánoia) suggests not just anger, but a loss of rational thought, indicating that their rage was so overwhelming it clouded their judgment and led them to a state of senseless hostility.
  • "and communed one with another what they might do to Jesus": This second clause reveals the direct consequence of their fury. Instead of repenting or acknowledging Jesus' divine authority, their overwhelming rage immediately propelled them into a conspiratorial discussion. They began to plot, seeking a course of action—any action—to neutralize or eliminate Jesus, demonstrating the depth of their animosity and their determination to oppose Him.

Literary Devices

Luke 6:11 employs several powerful literary devices. Irony is evident in the fact that those who meticulously upheld religious law were consumed by a "madness" that led them to plot evil against a man who had just performed an act of pure compassion and healing. Their legalistic zeal ironically blinded them to the very essence of God's law, which is love and mercy. The verse also uses Foreshadowing, as this initial "communing" about what they might do to Jesus sets the stage for the escalating opposition that will eventually lead to His arrest, trial, and crucifixion. This verse marks a significant turning point, indicating that the conflict has moved beyond theological debate to a direct threat against Jesus' life. Finally, there is a strong Contrast between Jesus' life-giving, compassionate action and the religious leaders' murderous, life-threatening reaction, highlighting the fundamental difference between true righteousness and hypocritical legalism.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Luke 6:11 serves as a stark reminder of the profound spiritual blindness that can result from rigid adherence to human traditions over divine truth and compassion. The religious leaders, ostensibly guardians of God's law, were so consumed by their own interpretations and perceived authority that they became enraged by an act of pure good. Their "madness" was not merely personal pique but a profound spiritual illness, leading them to actively oppose the very Son of God. This passage underscores the danger of legalism, which prioritizes external rules over the internal transformation of the heart, and how it can lead to a distorted view of God and a violent rejection of His redemptive work. It highlights the eternal conflict between the Spirit of life and the letter of the law that kills.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The "madness" of the Pharisees in Luke 6:11 offers a sobering reflection for believers today. It reveals how deeply ingrained human traditions and self-righteousness can blind individuals to the clear demonstration of God's love and power. When our understanding of faith becomes more about rules and appearances than about genuine compassion and the Spirit's leading, we risk falling into a similar trap of spiritual pride and opposition to God's work. This verse challenges us to examine our hearts: Are we open to God's transformative work, even when it challenges our comfort zones or preconceived notions? Do we prioritize love, mercy, and the well-being of others above rigid adherence to non-essential doctrines or traditions? The ultimate goal of our faith should be to reflect Christ's character, which is marked by grace and truth, not by a judgmental spirit that condemns acts of goodness.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life or faith might I be prioritizing tradition or personal comfort over God's call to compassion and radical love?
  • How do I react when God's truth challenges my established beliefs or practices? Do I respond with humility or resistance?
  • What are the "madnesses" (irrational rages or blind spots) that might prevent me from seeing God at work in unexpected ways today?

FAQ

Why were the religious leaders so enraged by Jesus' healing on the Sabbath, even to the point of plotting against Him?

Answer: The religious leaders, particularly the Pharisees, had developed an elaborate system of oral traditions and interpretations around the Sabbath law, which often superseded the original intent of God's command. They viewed any healing on the Sabbath that was not a matter of immediate life or death as a violation of these traditions, considering it "work." Jesus' act of healing the man with the withered hand, which was not a life-threatening emergency, was seen as a deliberate challenge to their authority and their interpretation of the law. His compassion exposed their legalism and hypocrisy, as they valued their rules more than human suffering. This public defiance, coupled with His undeniable divine authority, threatened their power and influence, provoking an irrational fury (madness) that led them to conspire against Him, as seen in Luke 6:7 and Luke 6:9.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Luke 6:11, detailing the religious leaders' "madness" and plotting against Jesus, profoundly points to Christ's ultimate fulfillment of redemptive prophecy. This verse is a poignant early indication of the world's rejection of its Savior, foreshadowing the very reason for His incarnation. Jesus, the embodiment of God's perfect compassion and law-keeping, intentionally broke human traditions to reveal the true heart of God's law: love and mercy. The "madness" of His accusers, driven by spiritual blindness and self-righteousness, ultimately served God's sovereign plan. Their plotting to "do to Jesus" what they might, culminated not in His defeat, but in His atoning sacrifice on the cross, the very act by which salvation was secured. The rejection and suffering Jesus endured, beginning with these early conspiracies, were necessary steps for Him to become the "Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world" John 1:29. His willingness to face this opposition, even unto death, demonstrates His perfect obedience to the Father and His boundless love for humanity, fulfilling prophecies of a suffering servant who would be despised and rejected Isaiah 53:3-5. Thus, the "madness" of humanity against Christ paradoxically became the means of our redemption, showcasing God's ability to use even the darkest human intentions for His glorious purposes Acts 2:23.

Copy as

Commentary on Luke 6 verses 1–11

These two passages of story we had both in Matthew and Mark, and they were there laid together (Mat 12:1; Mar 2:23; Mar 3:1), because, though happening at some distance of time from each other, both were designed to rectify the mistakes of the scribes and Pharisees concerning the sabbath day, on the bodily rest of which they laid greater stress and required greater strictness than the Law-giver intended. Here,

I. Christ justifies his disciples in a work of necessity for themselves on that day, and that was plucking the ears of corn, when they were hungry on that day. This story here has a date, which we had not in the other evangelists; it was on the second sabbath after the first (Luk 6:1), that is, as Dr. Whitby thinks is pretty clear, the first sabbath after the second day of unleavened bread, from which day they reckoned the seven weeks to the feast of pentecost; the first of which they called Sabbaton deuteroprōton, the second deuterodeuteron, and so on. Blessed be God we need not be critical in this matter. Whether this circumstance be mentioned to intimate that this sabbath was thought to have some peculiar honour upon it, which aggravated the offence of the disciples, or only to intimate that, being the first sabbath after the offering of the first fruits, it was the time of the year when the corn was nearly ripe, is not material. We may observe, 1. Christ's disciples ought not to be nice and curious in their diet, at any time, especially on sabbath days, but take up with what is easiest got, and be thankful. These disciples plucked the ears of corn, and did eat (Luk 6:1); a little served them, and that which had no delicacy in it. 2. Many that are themselves guilty of the greatest crimes are forward to censure others for the most innocent and inoffensive actions, Luk 6:2. The Pharisees quarrelled with them as doing that which it was not lawful to do on the sabbath days, when it was their own practice to feed deliciously on sabbath days, more than on all other days. 3. Jesus Christ will justify his disciples when they are unjustly censured, and will own and accept of them in many a thing which men tell them it is not lawful for them to do. How well is it for us that men are not to be our judges, and that Christ will be our Advocate! 4. Ceremonial appointments may be dispensed with, in cases of necessity; as the appropriating of the showbread to the priests was dispensed with, when David was by Providence brought into such a strait that he must have either that or none, Luk 6:3, Luk 6:4. And, if God's own appointments might be thus set aside for a greater good, much more may the traditions of men. 5. Works of necessity are particularly allowable on the sabbath day; but we must take heed that we turn not this liberty into licentiousness, and abuse God's favourable concessions and condescensions to the prejudice of the work of the day. 6. Jesus Christ, though he allowed works of necessity on the sabbath day, will notwithstanding have us to know and remember that it is his day, and therefore is to be spent in his service and to his honour (Luk 6:5): The Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath. In the kingdom of the Redeemer, the sabbath day is to be turned into a Lord's day; the property of it is, in some respects, to be altered, and it is to be observed chiefly in honour of the Redeemer, as it had been before in honour of the Creator, Jer 16:14, Jer 16:15. In token of this, it shall not only have a new name, the Lord's day (yet not forgetting the old, for it is a sabbath of rest still) but shall be transferred to a new day, the first day of the week.

II. He justifies himself in doing works of mercy for others on the sabbath day. Observe in this, 1. Christ on the sabbath day entered into the synagogue. Note, It is our duty, as we have opportunity, to sanctify sabbaths in religious assemblies. On the sabbath there ought to be a holy convocation; and our place must not be empty without very good reason. 2. In the synagogue, on the sabbath day, he taught. Giving and receiving instruction from Christ is very proper work for a sabbath day, and for a synagogue. Christ took all opportunities to teach, not only his disciples, but the multitude. 3. Christ's patient was one of his hearers. A man whose right hand was withered came to learn from Christ. Whether he had any expectation to be healed by him does not appear. But those that would be cured by the grace of Christ must be willing to learn the doctrine of Christ. 4. Among those who were the hearers of Christ's excellent doctrine, and the eye-witnesses of his glorious miracles, there were some who came with no other design than to pick quarrels with him, Luk 6:7. The scribes and Pharisees would not, as became generous adversaries, give him fair warning that, if he did heal on the sabbath day, they would construe it into a violation of the fourth commandment, which they ought in honour and justice to have done, because it was a case without precedent (none having ever cured as he did), but they basely watched him, as the lion does his prey, whether he would heal on the sabbath day, that they might find an accusation against him, and surprise him with a prosecution. 5. Jesus Christ was neither ashamed nor afraid to own the purposes of his grace, in the face of those who, he knew, confronted them, Luk 6:8. He knew their faults, and what they designed, and he bade the man rise, and stand forth, hereby to try the patient's faith and boldness. 6. He appealed to his adversaries themselves, and to the convictions of natural conscience, whether it was the design of the fourth commandment to restrain men from doing good on the sabbath day, that good which their hand finds to do, which they have an opportunity for, and which cannot so well be put off to another time (Luk 6:9): Is it lawful to do good, or evil, on the sabbath days? No wicked men are such absurd and unreasonable men as persecutors are, who study to do evil to men for doing good. 7. He healed the poor man, and restored him to the present use of his right hand, with a word's speaking, though he knew that his enemies would not only take offence at it, but take advantage against him for it, Luk 6:10. Let not us be drawn off, either from our duty or usefulness, by the oppression we meet with in it. 8. His adversaries were hereby enraged so much the more against him, Luk 6:11. Instead of being convinced by this miracle, as they ought to have been, that he was a teacher come from God, - instead of being brought to be in love with him as a benefactor to mankind, - they were filled with madness, vexed that they could not frighten him from doing good, or hinder the growth of his interest in the affections of the people. They were mad at Christ, mad at the people, mad at themselves. Anger is a short madness, malice is a long one; impotent malice, especially disappointed malice; such was theirs. When they could not prevent his working this miracle, they communed one with another what they might do to Jesus, what other way they might take to run him down. We may well stand amazed at it that the sons of men should be so wicked as to do thus, and that the Son of God should be so patient as to suffer it.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–11. Public domain.
Copy as
Titus of Bostra (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 378
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
When the eyes of all were, as it were, riveted together, and their minds also fixed upon the consideration of the matter, he said to the man, Stretch forth thy hand; I command thee, Who created man. But he who had the withered hand hears, and is made whole, as it follows, And he stretched it, and it was restored. But they who should have been astonished at the miracle, increased in malice; as it follows, But they were filled with madness; and communed one with another what they should do to Jesus.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
Commentary on Luke
Then you heard the words of the Lord, saying, “Stretch forth your hand.” That is the common and universal remedy. You who think that you have a healthy hand beware lest it is withered by greed or by sacrilege. Hold it out often. Hold it out to the poor person who begs you. Hold it out to help your neighbor, to give protection to a widow, to snatch from harm one whom you see subjected to unjust insult. Hold it out to God for your sins. The hand is stretched forth; then it is healed. Jeroboam’s hand withered when he sacrificed to idols; then it stretched out when he entreated God.
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Now the Jews thought this unlawful on the Sabbath, but Christ by the gift of new grace represented hereby the rest of the law, the work of grace. Wonderfully has He called it the second-first sabbath, not the first-second, because that was loosed from the law which was first, and this is made first which was ordained second. It is therefore called the second sabbath according to number, the first according to the grace of the work. For that sabbath is better where there is no penalty, than that where there is a penalty prescribed. Or this perhaps was first in the foreknowledge of wisdom, and second in the sanction of the ordinance. Now in David escaping with his companions, there was a foreshadowing of Christ in the law, who with His Apostles escaped the prince of the world. But how was it that the Observer and Defender of the law Himself both eat the bread, and gave it to those that were with Him, which no one was allowed to eat but the priests, except that He might show by that figure that the priests' bread was to come over to the use of the people, or that we ought to imitate the priests' life, or that all the children of the Church are priests, for we are anointed into a holy priesthood, offering ourselves a spiritual sacrifice to God. (1 Pet. 2:5.) But if the sabbath was made for men, and the benefit of men required that a man when hungry (having been long without the fruits of the earth) should forsake the abstinence of the old fast, the law is surely not broken but fulfilled.

The Lord now proceeds to another work. For He who had determined to make the whole man safe, was able to cure each member. Hence it is said, And it came to pass also on another sabbath, that he entered into the synagogue and taught.

But the law by things present prefigured the form of things future, among which surely the days of rest to come are to be not from good works but from evil. For although secular works may be given up, yet it is no idle act of a good work to rest in the praise of God.

You have heard then the words of Him who says, Stretch forth thy hand. That is a frequent and common cure, and thou that thinkest thy hand is whole, beware lest it be contracted by avarice or sacrilege. Stretch it forth oftener to help thy neighbour, to protect the widow, to save from injury him whom you see the victim of unjust attack; stretch it forth to the poor man who beseeches thee; stretch it forth to the Lord, to ask pardon of thy sins; as the hand is stretched forth so is it healed. (1 Kings 13:5, 6.)
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
Commentary on Luke
“Are you angry at me because I have healed the whole man on the sabbath day?” In this place he revivified with the salutary strength of good works the hand which Adam stretched out to pluck the fruit of the forbidden tree. The hand which had withered through a crime was healed by good deeds. Christ thereby rebuked the Jews who violated the precepts of the law with evil interpretations. They thought that they should rest even from good works on the sabbath, since the law prefigured in the present the form of the future in which indeed the days of rest from evils, not from blessings, would come.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. in Matt. 40.) And as Matthew relates, they go out to take counsel, that they should kill him.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 23
The miracle sometimes converts to faith those who had disbelieved the word, but the Pharisees watched him to see if he would heal on the sabbath. The nature of an envious person is such that he makes the praises of others food for his own disease and is wickedly maddened by their reputation. Once more he spoke to this; “he reveals deep and mysterious things; he knows what is in the darkness, and the light dwells with him.” And why did he do this? Perhaps it might be to move the cruel and unpitying Pharisee to compassion. The man’s malady [his withered hand] perhaps might shame them and persuade them to dispel the flames of their envy.This question is most wise indeed and a most suitable statement to meet their folly. If it is lawful to do good on the sabbath and nothing prevents the sick being pitied by God, cease picking up opportunities for fault-finding against Christ and bringing down on your own head the sentence which the Father has decreed against those who dishonor the Son. You have heard the Father where he says of the Son by the voice of David, “I will crush his foes before him and strike down those who hate him.” But if it is not lawful to do good on the sabbath and the law forbids the saving of life, you have made yourself an accuser of the law.
Cyril of Alexandria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 444
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
But He taught things far beyond their comprehension, and opened to his hearers the way to future salvation by Him; and then after having first taught them, He suddenly showed His divine power, as it follows, and there was a man there whose right hand was withered.

For this is the way of the envious man, he feeds in himself his pang of grief with the praises of others. But the Lord knew all things, and searches the hearts; as it follows, But he knew their thoughts, and said to the man who had the withered hand, Rise up, and stand. And he arose, and stood forth, that perchance he might stir up the cruel Pharisees to pity, and allay the flames of their passion.

This is a very useful question, for if it is lawful to do good on the sabbath, and there is no reason why those who work should not obtain mercy from God, cease to gather up accusation against Christ. But if it be not lawful to do good on the sabbath, and the law prohibits the safety of life, thou art become the accuser of the law. For if we examine the very institution of the sabbath, we shall find it was introduced for an object of mercy, for God commanded to keep holy the sabbath, that may rest thy man servant and thy maid servant, and all thy cattle. (Exod. 20:23.) But he who has mercy on his ox, and the rest of his cattle, how much rather will he not have mercy on man troubled with a severe disease?

Thou perceivest, O Pharisee, a divine Worker, and Him Who delivers the sick by His heavenly power, and out of envy thou breathest forth death.
BedeAD 735
On the Gospel of Luke
But they themselves were filled with foolishness and conversed among themselves about what they might do to Jesus. Great foolishness indeed, consorting about the death of the Savior, when they themselves were in great need of salvation. Their devotion to wickedness is shown when they consider it a crime that a person restored his withered hand at His word. As though not each of them committed greater tasks on the Sabbath, by carrying food, extending a cup, and performing other necessary acts for sustenance. For neither could He who spoke and they were made be proven to have labored on the Sabbath.
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
He chiefly heals and teaches on the sabbaths, not only to convey the meaning of a spiritual sabbath, but because of the more numerous assembly of the people.

But since the Master had excused by an undeniable example the breach of the sabbath, with which they charged His disciples, their object is now by watching to bring a false accusation against the Master Himself. As it follows, And the Scribes and Pharisees watched him, if he would heal on the sabbath, that if He did not, they might accuse Him of cruelty or impotence; if He did, of violation of the sabbath. Hence it follows, that they might find an accusation against him.

But the Lord anticipating the false charge which they were preparing against Him, reproves those who by wrongly interpreting the law thought that they must rest on the sabbath-day even from good works; whereas the law commands us to abstain from servile works, i. e. from evil, on the sabbath. Hence it follows, Then said Jesus unto them, I ask you, Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath, &c.

The man represents the human race, withered by the unfruitfulness of good works, because of the hand in our first parent stretched forth to take the apple, which was healed by the innocent hand stretched forth on the cross. And rightly was the withered hand in the synagogue, because where there is the greater gift of knowledge, there the transgressor lies under the greater blame.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Luke 6:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.