- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
See on the biblical-era map



Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers John 10:39–42. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here the issue of the conference with the Jews. One would have thought it would have convinced and melted them, but their hearts were hardened. Here we are told,
I.How they attacked him by force. Therefore they sought again to take him, Joh 10:39. Therefore,
1.Because he had fully answered their charge of blasphemy, and wiped off that imputation, so that they could not for shame go on with their attempts to stone him, therefore they contrived to seize him, and prosecute him as an offender against the state. When they were constrained to drop their attempt by a popular tumult, they would try what they could do under colour of a legal process. See Rev 12:13. Or,
2.Because he persevered in the same testimony concerning himself, they persisted in their malice against him. What he had said before he did in effect say again, for the faithful witness never departs from what he has once said; and therefore, having the same provocation, they express the same resentment, and justify their attempt to stone him by another attempt to take him. Such is the temper of a persecuting spirit, and such its policy, mal facta mal factis tegere ne perpluant - to cover one set of bad deeds with another, lest the former should fall through.
II.How he avoided them by flight; not an inglorious retreat, in which there was any thing of human infirmity, but a glorious retirement, in which there was much of a divine power. He escaped out of their hands, not by the interposal of any friend that helped him, but by his own wisdom he got clear of them; he drew a veil over himself, or cast a mist before their eyes, or tied the hands of those whose hearts he did not turn. Note, No weapon formed against our Lord Jesus shall prosper, Psa 2:4. He escaped, not because he was afraid to suffer, but because his hour was not come. And he who knew how to deliver himself no doubt knows how to deliver the godly out of temptation, and to make a way for them to escape.
III.How he disposed of himself in his retirement:
He went away again beyond Jordan, Joh 10:40. The bishop of our souls came not to be fixed in one see, but to go about from place to place, doing good. This great benefactor was never out of his way, for wherever he came there was work to be done. Though Jerusalem was the royal city, yet he made many a kind visit to the country, not only to his own country Galilee, but to other parts, even those that lay most remote beyond Jordan. Now observe,
1.What shelter he found there. He went into a private part of the country, and there he abode; there he found some rest and quietness, when in Jerusalem he could find none. Note, Though persecutors may drive Christ and his gospel out of their own city or country, they cannot drive him or it out of the world. Though Jerusalem was not gathered, nor would be, yet Christ was glorious, and would be. Christ's going now beyond Jordan was a figure of the taking of the kingdom of God from the Jews, and bringing it to the Gentiles. Christ and his gospel have often found better entertainment among the plain country-people than among the wise, the mighty, the noble, Co1 1:26, Co1 1:27.
2.What success he found there. He did not go thither merely for his own security, but to do good there; and he chose to go thither, where John at first baptized (Joh 1:28), because there could not but remain some impressions of John's ministry and baptism thereabouts, which would dispose them to receive Christ and his doctrine; for it was not three years since John was baptizing, and Christ was himself baptized here at Bethabara. Christ came hither now to see what fruit there was of all the pains John Baptist had taken among them, and what they retained of the things they then heard and received. The event in some measure answered expectation; for we are told,
(1.)That they flocked after him (Joh 10:41): Many resorted to him. The return of the means of grace to a place, after they have been for some time intermitted, commonly occasions a great stirring of affections. Some think Christ chose to abide at Bethabara, the house of passage, where the ferry-boats lay by which they crossed the river Jordan, that the confluence of people thither might give an opportunity of teaching many who would come to hear him when it lay in their way, but who would scarcely go a step out of the road for an opportunity of attending on his word.
(2.)That they reasoned in his favour, and sought arguments to induce them to close with him as much as those at Jerusalem sought objections against him. They said very judiciously, John did no miracle, but all things that John spoke of this man were true. Two things they considered, upon recollecting what they had seen and heard from John, and comparing it with Christ's ministry.
[1.]That Christ far exceeded John Baptist's power, for John did no miracle, but Jesus does many; whence it is easy to infer that Jesus is greater than John. And, if John was so great a prophet, how great then is this Jesus! Christ is best known and acknowledged by such a comparison with others as sets him superlatively above others. Though John came in the spirit and power of Elias, yet he did not work miracles, as Elias did, lest the minds of people should be made to hesitate between him and Jesus; therefore the honour of working miracles was reserved for Jesus as a flower of his crown, that there might be a sensible demonstration, and undeniable one, that though he came after John, yet he was preferred far before him.
[2.]That Christ exactly answered John Baptist's testimony. John not only did no miracle to divert people from Christ, but he said a great deal to direct them to Christ, and to turn them over as apprentices to him, and this came to their minds now: all things that John said of this man were true, that he should be the Lamb of God, should baptize with Holy Ghost and with fire. Great things John had said of him, which raised their expectations; so that though they had not zeal enough to carry them into his country to enquire after him, yet, when he came into theirs, and brought his gospel to their doors, they acknowledged him as great as John had said he would be. When we get acquainted with Christ, and come to know him experimentally, we find all things that the scripture saith of him to be true; nay, and that the reality exceeds the report, Kg1 10:6, Kg1 10:7. John Baptist was now dead and gone, and yet his hearers profited by what they had heard formerly, and, by comparing what they heard then with what they saw now, they gained a double advantage; for, First, They were confirmed in their belief that John was a prophet, who foretold such things, and spoke of the eminency to which this Jesus would arrive, though his beginning was so small. Secondly, They were prepared to believe that Jesus was the Christ, in whom they saw those things accomplished which John foretold. By this we see that the success and efficacy of the word preached are not confined to the life of the preacher, nor do they expire with his breath, but that which seemed as water spilt upon the ground may afterwards be gathered up again. See Zac 1:5, Zac 1:6.
(3.)That many believed on him there. Believing that he who wrought such miracles, and in whom John's predictions were fulfilled, was what he declared himself to be, the Son of God, they gave up themselves to him as his disciples, Joh 10:42. An emphasis is here to be laid,
[1.]Upon the persons that believed on him; they were many. While those that received and embraced his doctrine at Jerusalem were but as the grape-gleanings of the vintage, those that believed on him in the country, beyond the Jordan, were a full harvest gathered in to him.
[2.]Upon the place where this was; it was where John had been preaching and baptizing and had had great success; there many believed on the Lord Jesus. Where the preaching of the doctrine of repentance has had success, as desired, there the preaching of the doctrine of reconciliation and gospel grace is most likely to be prosperous. Where John has been acceptable, Jesus will not be unacceptable. The jubilee-trumpet sounds sweetest in the ears of those who in the day of atonement have afflicted their souls for sin.
Historical interpretation
Three Centuries of Reception
4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
"Therefore they sought again to take Him, but He escaped out of their hands, and went away again beyond Jordan, into the place where John at first baptized. And many resorted unto Him, and said, John did no miracle, but all things that John spake of this man were true."
When He hath uttered anything great and sublime, He quickly retireth, giving way to their anger, so that the passion may abate and cease through His absence. And thus He acted at that time. But wherefore doth the Evangelist mention the place? That thou mayest learn that He went there to remind them of the things there done and said by John, and of his testimony; at least when they came there, they straightway remembered John. Wherefore also they said, "John indeed did no miracle," since how did it follow that they should add this, unless the place had brought the Baptist to their memory, and they had come to remember his testimony. And observe how they form incontrovertible syllogisms. "John indeed did no miracle," "but this man doth," saith some one; "hence therefore his superiority is shown. If therefore men believed him who did no miracles, much more must they believe this man." Then, since it was John who bore the witness, lest his having done no miracle might seem to prove him unworthy of being a witness, they added, "Yet if he did no miracle, still he spake all things truly concerning this man"; no longer proving Christ to be trustworthy by means of John, but John to be so by what Christ had done.
"Many therefore believed on Him." There were many things that attracted them. They remembered the words which John had spoken, calling Christ "mightier than himself," and "light," and "life," and "truth," and all the rest. They remembered the Voice which came down from heaven, and the Spirit which appeared in the shape of a dove, and pointed Him out to all; and with this they recollected the demonstration afforded by the miracles, looking to which they were for the future established. "For," saith some one, "if it was right that we should believe John, much more ought we to believe this man; if him without miracles, much more this man, who besides the testimony of John, hath also the proof from miracles." Seest thou how much the abiding in this place, and the being freed from the presence of evil men, profited them? wherefore Jesus continually leadeth and draweth them away from the company of those persons; as also He seemeth to have done under the old Covenant, forming and ordering the Jews in all points, in the desert, at a distance from the Egyptians.
(Hom. lxi. 3) Christ, after discoursing on some high truth, commonly retires immediately, to give time to the fury of people to abate, during His absence. Thus He did now: He went away again beyond Jordan, into the place where John at first baptized. He went there that He might recall to people's minds, what had gone on there; John's preaching and testimony to Himself.
(Hom. lxi. 3) Mark their reasoning, John did no miracle, but this Man did; wherefore He is the superior. But lest the absence of miracles should lessen the weight of John's testimony, they add, But all things that John spake of this Man were true. Though he did no miracle, yet every thing he said of Christ was true, whence they conclude, if John was to be believed, much more this Man, who has the evidence of miracles. Thus it follows, And many believed on Him.
(Tract. xlviii. 11) To lay hold of Him, not by faith and the understanding, but with bloodthirsty violence. Do thou so lay hold of Him, that thou mayest have sure hold; they would fain have laid hold on Him, but they could not: for it follows, But He escaped out of their hand. They did lay hold of Him with the hand of faith. It was no great matter for the Word to rescue His flesh from the hands of flesh.
The Jews still persist in their madness; Therefore they sought again to take Him.
Continue studying John 10:39 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
records a pivotal moment in Jesus' public ministry, where the escalating hostility from the Jewish religious leaders culminates in yet another attempt to seize Him. Enraged by His profound claims of divine unity with the Father, they sought to arrest Him, but Jesus, demonstrating His sovereign control over His own destiny, miraculously eluded their grasp. This incident underscores the persistent rejection of Jesus' identity by those in authority while simultaneously affirming His divine power and the unfolding of God's perfect timing for His ultimate redemptive mission.
Context
Literary Context
This verse immediately follows Jesus' bold and unequivocal declaration of His divine identity during the Feast of Dedication (Hanukkah) in Jerusalem. In John 10:30, Jesus states, "I and my Father are one," a claim that the Jewish leaders instantly recognized as an assertion of equality with God. Their immediate response, recorded in John 10:31, was to pick up stones to stone Him for perceived blasphemy. When Jesus challenged their intent, further asserting that He is the one "whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world" in John 10:36, their fury intensified. The attempt "to take him" in John 10:39 signifies a shift from a spontaneous mob stoning to a more deliberate attempt at arrest, likely with the intention of bringing Him to a formal trial. This event is part of a recurring pattern of opposition and attempts to seize Jesus, as seen earlier in John 7:30 and John 8:59.
Historical & Cultural Context
The setting is Jerusalem during the Feast of Dedication, or Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple after its desecration by Antiochus IV Epiphanes. This feast celebrated God's miraculous deliverance and light, ironically becoming the backdrop for the rejection of the true Light of the World. The Jewish leaders' accusation of blasphemy (John 10:33) was based on their understanding of Mosaic Law, which prescribed death by stoning for those who blasphemed God's name or claimed divine prerogatives (Leviticus 24:16). While the Jewish authorities had limited judicial autonomy under Roman rule and could not carry out capital punishment without Roman consent (a point that becomes crucial later in Jesus' trial), mob actions like stoning were not uncommon. The shift from stoning to attempting to "take him" suggests a desire for a more "legal" process to condemn Jesus, reflecting the increasing desperation and hardening of hearts among the religious elite who perceived Jesus as a threat to their authority and interpretation of the Law.
Key Themes
John 10:39 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the Gospel of John and broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it highlights Divine Sovereignty and Timing. Jesus' repeated escapes from capture (e.g., John 7:30, John 8:59) are not mere coincidences or clever evasions but demonstrations that His "hour"—the divinely appointed time for His crucifixion—had not yet come. This underscores God's meticulous control over the unfolding of His redemptive plan, independent of human malice or intent. Secondly, the verse emphasizes the persistent Rejection of Christ by the religious authorities. Despite Jesus' clear teachings, miraculous signs, and self-attestations, their unbelief hardened into active opposition, culminating in repeated attempts to silence or eliminate Him rather than acknowledge His divine claims. Finally, Jesus' effortless escape points to His Miraculous Power and Authority. The manner of His departure, simply "He escaped out of their hand," suggests a supernatural intervention, affirming His inherent power and control over His own life and destiny, which He would later voluntarily lay down (John 10:18).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb signifies a deliberate, earnest, and often persistent effort to find or obtain something. In this context, it implies a determined and repeated attempt by the Jewish leaders to apprehend Jesus, not merely a casual search. It conveys their resolve and the intensity of their opposition, indicating a plot or scheme against His life or freedom.
Literally meaning "to come out" or "to go forth," this word, when used in the context of escaping from a grasp or a dangerous situation, suggests a departure that is often effortless or supernatural. It does not imply a physical struggle or a clever evasion on Jesus' part, but rather a miraculous, unhindered exit from their attempted seizure, emphasizing divine intervention.
While literally referring to the physical hand, in this context, "hand" is used idiomatically to represent power, authority, control, or grasp. Thus, Jesus escaping "out of their hand" means He escaped from their power, their control, and their ability to apprehend Him, highlighting His sovereignty over their attempts to seize Him.
Verse Breakdown
"Therefore they sought again to take him"
The adverb "Therefore" (G3767, oûn) directly links this renewed attempt to the preceding discourse, specifically Jesus' claims of unity with the Father and His divine sonship, which the Jewish leaders deemed blasphemous. The phrase "sought again" (G3825, pálin with G2212, zētéō) emphasizes the persistence and repeated nature of their efforts, demonstrating their unwavering resolve to apprehend Jesus. "To take him" (G4084, piázō) indicates an intent to seize or arrest Him, likely for formal legal proceedings rather than another spontaneous stoning.
"but he escaped out of their hand"
The conjunction "but" (G2532, kaí) introduces a stark contrast to their determined efforts. "He escaped" (G1831, exérchomai) signifies a miraculous and effortless departure, not a physical struggle or a clever trick. The phrase "out of their hand" (G1537, ek with G5495, cheír) underscores that He slipped beyond their power, control, and physical grasp, highlighting His divine authority and the fact that His life was not subject to human will or timing.
Literary Devices
The passage employs several literary devices to convey its profound theological message. There is a strong element of Irony, as the very people who claim to uphold God's law are attempting to seize and condemn the Son of God Himself, who embodies that law. The repeated attempts to seize Jesus, followed by His effortless escapes, create a pattern of Repetition that underscores the futility of human opposition against divine will. The manner of Jesus' escape, described simply as "he escaped out of their hand," suggests a Divine Passive or Miraculous Intervention, implying that God's power was actively at work in His deliverance, rather than Jesus employing a human strategy. This also serves as Foreshadowing, hinting at Jesus' ultimate control over His own destiny, including His eventual voluntary surrender to death at the appointed time, rather than being forcibly taken against His will. The stark Contrast between the intense human malice and the serene divine power is powerfully conveyed.
Theological and Thematic Connections
John 10:39 is a powerful testament to the sovereignty of God and the unique nature of Jesus Christ. It underscores that Jesus' life, ministry, and ultimate sacrifice were not subject to human machinations or timing, but were unfolding according to a divine plan. The inability of the Jewish leaders to seize Jesus when they desired highlights that His "hour" had not yet come, a recurring theme in John's Gospel. This divine control over His life demonstrates His inherent deity and authority, affirming that He would lay down His life voluntarily, not as a helpless victim. This passage thus reinforces the truth that God's purposes cannot be thwarted by human opposition, no matter how intense or determined.
Reflection and Application
John 10:39 offers profound spiritual nourishment and practical application for believers today. Jesus' miraculous escape reminds us that God's ultimate plan and timing are sovereign, even amidst fierce opposition and seemingly insurmountable challenges. Just as Jesus' life was not subject to the whims of His enemies but to the perfect will of the Father, so too are the lives of His followers held securely in God's hands. This instills a deep sense of trust and peace, knowing that our ultimate protection and purpose are divinely ordained. It encourages us to persevere in speaking truth and living faithfully, even when it evokes hostility, because God is ultimately in control. We are called to rest in His sovereignty, confident that no human power can thwart His purposes for our lives or for the advancement of His kingdom. This passage strengthens our faith in Jesus' divine power and His unwavering commitment to fulfilling His Father's will.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did they want to "take him" rather than stone him again?
The shift from picking up stones (John 10:31) to seeking to "take him" in John 10:39 indicates a desire for a more formal and "legal" process. Stoning was often a spontaneous mob action, driven by immediate outrage. To "take him" (Greek piázō) implies an arrest, with the intent of bringing Jesus before a religious court (like the Sanhedrin) for a formal trial and condemnation. This would lend a veneer of legitimacy to their actions and potentially allow them to involve Roman authorities for capital punishment, which they themselves could not directly administer. It reflects an escalating and more calculated strategy to eliminate Jesus.
How did Jesus "escape"? Was it a physical feat or something else?
The text states "he escaped out of their hand" (Greek: exēlthen ek tēs cheirós autōn), which literally means "he went out from their hand." This phrasing, coupled with other instances of Jesus eluding capture (John 8:59; Luke 4:30), strongly suggests a supernatural or miraculous departure rather than a mere physical struggle, clever evasion, or stealthy retreat. It implies that Jesus simply passed through them, became invisible, or was supernaturally enabled to leave their grasp without their ability to prevent it. This highlights His divine power and His sovereign control over His own life and the timing of His eventual surrender.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The escape of Jesus in John 10:39 is a profound demonstration of His divine sovereignty and foreshadows the ultimate, voluntary nature of His sacrifice. While His enemies sought to seize Him by force, Jesus repeatedly proved that His life was not subject to their will, but to the Father's perfect timing. This temporary escape highlights His inherent power, a power He would later choose to lay down. The true Christ-centered fulfillment is not in His ability to escape death, but in His willingness to embrace it for the redemption of humanity. This passage sets the stage for the climactic moment when Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, would voluntarily surrender Himself to the cross, as He Himself declared, "No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again." His escape here is a powerful affirmation that His death would not be an accident or a forced event, but the sovereign act of a divine King, fulfilling the eternal plan of salvation (Acts 2:23). Thus, His temporary escape ultimately points to His purposeful and redemptive surrender, securing eternal life for all who believe (John 3:16).