Skip to content

John 2:7

“The Wedding at Cana”· John 2:1–11Read in context
King James Version
Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim.
KJV (with Strong's)
Jesus G2424 saith G3004 unto them G846, Fill G1072 the waterpots G5201 with water G5204. And G2532 they filled G1072 them G846 up G1072 to G2193 the brim G507.
Complete Jewish Bible
Yeshua told them, “Fill the jars with water,” and they filled them to the brim.
Berean Standard Bible
Jesus told the servants, “Fill the jars with water.” So they filled them to the brim.
American Standard Version
Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim.
World English Bible Messianic
Yeshua said to them, “Fill the water pots with water.” They filled them up to the brim.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Iesus sayde vnto them, Fill the waterpots with water. Then they filled them vp to the brim.
Young's Literal Translation
Jesus saith to them, `Fill the water-jugs with water;' and they filled them--unto the brim;
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
All John Sites (Jerusalem)
All John Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Jesus' First Journey from Galilee to Jerusalem
Jesus' First Journey from Galilee to Jerusalem View full PDF
John 2:1-11
John 2:1-11 View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 26,103 of 31,102 · 83.9%

Study this verse

Summary

John 2:7 records Jesus' pivotal command to the servants at the wedding in Cana to fill six large stone waterpots with water, an instruction they carried out with complete obedience by filling the vessels to their very brim. This seemingly ordinary act of filling served as the crucial preparatory step for Jesus' first public miracle, transforming a potential social embarrassment into a profound demonstration of His divine power and the inauguration of His public ministry, revealing His glory and foreshadowing the abundant new life found in Him.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is an integral part of the narrative detailing Jesus' first public miracle at the wedding in Cana of Galilee. The event unfolds after the wine runs out, a potentially embarrassing and shameful situation for the hosts in ancient Near Eastern culture. Jesus' mother, Mary, informs Him of the predicament, and subsequently instructs the servants, "Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it" (John 2:5). This instruction from Mary highlights the theme of obedience that is central to the miracle. John 2:7 records Jesus' direct command to these servants, initiating the process that would lead to the miraculous transformation of water into wine, setting the stage for the steward's later astonishment in John 2:9-10.

Historical & Cultural Context

The six stone waterpots mentioned were large vessels, each capable of holding twenty to thirty gallons, typically used for Jewish purification rituals (John 2:6). These rituals involved ceremonial washing of hands, feet, and vessels, essential for maintaining ritual purity according to Mosaic law and rabbinic tradition. The running out of wine at a wedding feast was not merely an inconvenience but a grave social disgrace that would bring shame upon the host family. Weddings were multi-day celebrations, and hospitality was a paramount virtue. Jesus' intervention, therefore, was not just a display of power but an act of compassion that averted a significant social catastrophe for the newly married couple and their families, demonstrating His concern for human needs and relationships within a specific cultural framework.

Key Themes

The immediate and complete obedience of the servants to Jesus' seemingly mundane instruction is a pivotal theme in this passage. Their willingness to fill the waterpots completely, without knowing Jesus' ultimate purpose, demonstrates a profound trust that sets the stage for the miracle. This highlights simple obedience as a prerequisite for divine intervention. Furthermore, Jesus' command reveals His inherent divine authority and power; He doesn't perform a magical incantation but simply gives an instruction, and the subsequent transformation underscores His power over creation. The act of filling the waterpots with water was a necessary preparation for transformation, illustrating how God often uses our humble, obedient efforts as a foundation for His extraordinary works. The detail "filled them up to the brim" emphasizes the abundance and sufficiency of what was provided, foreshadowing the overflowing grace and provision found in Christ, which far exceeds human expectation or need, as later evidenced by the quality and quantity of the wine (John 2:10).

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Fill gemízō G1072

This verb signifies to "fill entirely" or "make full." In the context of John 2:7, it emphasizes the completeness of the action Jesus commanded. The servants were not merely to put some water in, but to fill the waterpots to their full capacity, leaving no room for doubt about the initial contents of the vessels. This thoroughness is crucial for the integrity of the miracle that follows.

Waterpots hydría G5201

Derived from the word for "water" (hýdōr), this term specifically refers to a "water-jar" or "receptacle for family supply." John 2:6 specifies these were "six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews," indicating their customary use in ritual cleansing. Their large capacity (20-30 gallons each) underscores the sheer volume of water involved in the miracle, highlighting the lavishness of Jesus' provision.

Brim ánō G507

This adverb means "upward" or "on the top," indicating the highest point or limit. When combined with "up to" (Greek, héōs), it forms the phrase "up to the brim," emphasizing that the waterpots were filled to their absolute maximum capacity. This detail is crucial for the narrative's integrity, ensuring that no one could claim wine was already present or that the miracle was anything less than a complete transformation of water that occupied the entire vessel.

Verse Breakdown

"Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water."

This is a direct, authoritative command from Jesus. It is simple, clear, and seemingly mundane. The command to "fill" is active and requires human effort, yet it also sets the stage for a divine act. The specific instruction to use "water" highlights the raw material for the miracle, emphasizing that the transformation would be from a common, ordinary substance.

"And they filled them up to the brim."

This clause highlights the immediate and complete obedience of the servants. The phrase "up to the brim" is a crucial detail, underscoring their thoroughness and leaving no ambiguity about the quantity or nature of the liquid initially placed in the jars. This full measure of obedience provides the undeniable evidence for the miracle that follows, demonstrating that the vessels contained nothing but water before Jesus' transformative power was exercised.

Literary Devices

John 2:7 is rich with Symbolism. The water itself, used for Jewish purification rites, symbolizes the Old Covenant's emphasis on external cleansing and ritual law. The subsequent transformation of this water into wine symbolizes the New Covenant, inaugurated by Christ, which brings internal transformation, joy, and abundance, surpassing the old. The Emphasis on filling the waterpots "up to the brim" highlights the completeness of the servants' obedience and, more importantly, the lavish and overflowing nature of Jesus' provision. This detail leaves no room for doubt about the miracle's authenticity. Furthermore, the entire episode serves as Foreshadowing, pointing to Jesus' identity as the Messiah who brings a new, superior reality, fulfilling and superseding the old traditions, and providing spiritual abundance that satisfies deeply.

Theological and Thematic Connections

John 2:7 serves as a powerful testament to the principle that divine power often works through human obedience, even when the instructions seem ordinary or the outcome is unclear. The servants' simple act of filling the jars with water, a task they could understand and execute, became the necessary conduit for an extraordinary miracle. This highlights a foundational theological truth: God invites our participation in His work, not as the source of power, but as willing vessels. The abundance of the transformed wine also foreshadows the overflowing grace and new life that Jesus brings, far exceeding the limitations of the Old Covenant's rituals. This miracle, initiated by a command and completed by obedience, underscores Jesus' authority as the Lord of creation, capable of transforming the mundane into the miraculous.

Luke 5:5"And Simon answering said unto him, Master, we have toiled all the night, and have taken nothing: nevertheless at thy word I will let down the net."
Philippians 2:8"And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross."
Romans 12:2"And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God."

Reflection and Application

John 2:7 offers a timeless lesson on the profound power of simple obedience to God's word. Often, God's instructions may not immediately make logical sense to us, or they might seem insignificant in the grand scheme of our problems. However, this verse teaches that our role is to obey faithfully and completely, just as the servants did. Their willingness to act on Christ's commands, even when the ultimate purpose was unknown, provided the necessary "vessels" for Him to work His transformative power. In our own lives, there may be "waterpots" – mundane tasks, seemingly small acts of service, or difficult commands – that God asks us to fill. Our diligent and complete obedience, even in the ordinary, creates the space for God to do the extraordinary, turning our "water" into "wine" and manifesting His glory in our circumstances. It encourages us to trust that when we do our part with diligence, God will do His, transforming the ordinary into the extraordinary and revealing His magnificent power.

Questions for Reflection

  1. What "waterpots" or mundane tasks is Jesus asking you to "fill" with simple obedience in your life today?
  2. How does the servants' complete obedience ("up to the brim") challenge your own willingness to obey God fully, even when you don't understand the outcome?
  3. In what areas of your life are you waiting for a miracle, and what small, obedient steps might God be calling you to take as preparation?

FAQ

Why did Jesus ask the servants to fill the waterpots with water, rather than simply creating wine out of nothing?

Jesus' instruction to fill the waterpots with water was crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it established an undeniable context for the miracle. By having the servants, who were witnesses, fill the jars to the brim with plain water, there could be no doubt that the subsequent wine was a miraculous creation and not simply a pre-existing supply or a trick. This act of filling provided tangible evidence that the transformation was real. Secondly, it demonstrated the principle of divine power working through human participation. While Jesus could have created wine ex nihilo, He chose to involve the servants in a simple act of obedience, highlighting that God often uses our available resources and our willingness to obey as the foundation for His extraordinary works. This also served to manifest His glory to those who witnessed the miracle, as noted in John 2:11.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The miracle at Cana, initiated by Jesus' command in John 2:7, profoundly points to Christ's identity and the nature of His saving work. The transformation of water, used for ceremonial purification under the Old Covenant, into an abundance of the finest wine symbolizes the transition from the old order to the new covenant established through Jesus. The water of ritual cleansing, which could only temporarily address external impurity, is superseded by the wine of the New Covenant, representing the joy, abundance, and inner transformation that Jesus brings. This "good wine" (John 2:10), superior to what was served before, signifies the surpassing grace and truth that came through Jesus Christ, as opposed to the law given through Moses (John 1:17). Jesus is the ultimate source of true satisfaction and spiritual abundance, offering living water that quenches eternal thirst (John 4:14) and life more abundantly than we could ever imagine (John 10:10). The wedding feast itself foreshadows the great messianic banquet, where Christ, the true Bridegroom, provides ultimate joy and communion for His people, demonstrating His power to transform not just water, but human lives and the very nature of our relationship with God.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers John 2:1–11. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 11 verses
Passage under commentJohn 2:1–11
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

We have here the story of Christ's miraculous conversion of water into wine at a marriage in Cana of Galilee. There were some few so well disposed as to believe in Christ, and to follow him, when he did no miracle; yet it was not likely that many should be wrought upon till he had something wherewith to answer those that asked, What sign showest thou? He could have wrought miracles before, could have made them the common actions of his life and the common entertainments of his friends; but, miracles being designed for the sacred and solemn seals of his doctrine, he began not to work any till he began to preach his doctrine. Now observe,

I.The occasion of this miracle.

Maimonides observes it to be to the honour of Moses that all the signs he did in the wilderness he did upon necessity; we needed food, he brought us manna, and so did Christ. Observe,

1.The time: the third day after he came into Galilee. The evangelist keeps a journal of occurrences, for no day passed without something extraordinary done or said. Our Master filled up his time better than his servants do, and never lay down at night complaining, as the Roman emperor did, that he had lost a day.

2.The place: it was at Cana in Galilee, in the tribe of Asher (Jos 19:28), of which, before, it was said that he shall yield royal dainties, Gen 49:20. Christ began to work miracles in an obscure corner of the country, remote from Jerusalem, which was the public scene of action, to show that he sought not honour from men (Joh 5:41), but would put honour upon the lowly. His doctrine and miracles would not be so much opposed by the plain and honest Galileans as they would be by the proud and prejudiced rabbies, politicians, and grandees, at Jerusalem.

3.The occasion itself was a marriage; probably one or both of the parties were akin to our Lord Jesus. The mother of Jesus is said to be there, and not to be called, as Jesus and his disciples were, which intimates that she was there as one at home. Observe the honour which Christ hereby put upon the ordinance of marriage, that he graced the solemnity of it, not only with his presence, but with his first miracle; because it was instituted and blessed in innocency, because by it he would still seek a godly seed, because it resembles the mystical union between him and his church, and because he foresaw that in the papal kingdom, while the marriage ceremony would be unduly dignified and advanced into a sacrament, the married state would be unduly vilified, as inconsistent with any sacred function. There was a marriage - gamos, a marriage-feast, to grace the solemnity. Marriages were usually celebrated with festivals (Gen 29:22; Jdg 14:10), in token of joy and friendly respect, and for the confirming of love.

4.Christ and his mother and disciples were principal guests at this entertainment. The mother of Jesus (that was her most honourable title) was there; no mention being made of Joseph, we conclude him dead before this. Jesus was called, and he came, accepted the invitation, and feasted with them, to teach us to be respectful to our relations, and sociable with them, though they be mean. Christ was to come in a way different from that of John Baptist, who came neither eating nor drinking, Mat 11:18, Mat 11:19. It is the wisdom of the prudent to study how to improve conversation rather than how to decline it.

(1.)There was a marriage, and Jesus was called. Note,

[1.]It is very desirable, when there is a marriage, to have Jesus Christ present at it; to have his spiritual gracious presence, to have the marriage owned and blessed by him: the marriage is then honourable indeed; and they that marry in the Lord (Co1 7:39) do not marry without him.

[2.]They that would have Christ with them at their marriage must invite him by prayer; that is the messenger that must be sent to heaven for him; and he will come: Thou shalt call, and I will answer. And he will turn the water into wine.

(2.)The disciples also were invited, those five whom he had called (ch. 1), for as yet he had no more; they were his family, and were invited with him. They had thrown themselves upon his care, and they soon found that, though he had no wealth, he had good friends. Note,

[1.]Those that follow Christ shall feast with him, they shall fare as he fares, so he has bespoken for them (Joh 12:26): Where I am, there shall my servant be also.

[2.]Love to Christ is testified by a love to those that are his, for his sake; our goodness extendeth not to him, but to the saints. Calvin observes how generous the maker of the feast was, though he seems to have been but of small substance, to invite four or five strangers more than he thought of, because they were followers of Christ, which shows, saith he, that there is more of freedom, and liberality, and true friendship, in the conversation of some meaner persons than among many of higher rank.

II.The miracle itself. In which observe,

1.They wanted wine, Joh 2:3.

(1.)There was want at a feast; though much was provided, yet all was spent. While we are in this world we sometimes find ourselves in straits, even then when we think ourselves in the fulness of our sufficiency. If always spending, perhaps all is spent ere we are aware.

(2.)There was want at a marriage feast. Note, They who, being married, are come to care for the things of the world must expect trouble in the flesh, and count upon disappointment.

(3.)It should seem, Christ and his disciples were the occasion of this want, because there was more company than was expected when the provision was made; but they who straiten themselves for Christ shall not lose by him.

2.The mother of Jesus solicited him to assist her friends in this strait. We are told (Joh 2:3-5) what passed between Christ and his mother upon this occasion.

(1.)She acquaints him with the difficulty they were in (Joh 2:3): She saith unto him, They have no wine. Some think that she did not expect from him any miraculous supply (he having as yet wrought no miracle), but that she would have him make some decent excuse to the company, and make the best of it, to save the bridegroom's reputation, and keep him in countenance; or (as Calvin suggests) would have him make up the want of wine with some holy profitable discourse. But, most probably, she looked for a miracle; for she knew he was now appearing as the great prophet, like unto Moses, who so often seasonably supplied the wants of Israel; and, though this was his first public miracle, perhaps he had sometimes relieved her and her husband in their low estate. The bridegroom might have sent out for more wine, but she was for going to the fountain-head. Note,

[1.]We ought to be concerned for the wants and straits of our friends, and not seek our own things only.

[2.]In our own and our friends' straits it is our wisdom and duty to apply ourselves to Christ by prayer.

[3.]In our addresses to Christ, we must not prescribe to him, but humbly spread our case before him, and then refer ourselves to him to do as he pleases.

(2.)He gave her a reprimand for it, for he saw more amiss in it than we do, else he had not treated it thus. - Here is,

[1.]The rebuke itself: Woman, what have I to do with thee? As many as Christ loves, he rebukes and chastens. He calls her woman, not mother. When we begin to be assuming, we should be reminded what we are, men and women, frail, foolish, and corrupt. The question, ti emoi kai soi, might be read, What is that to me and thee? What is it to us if they do want? But it is always as we render it, What have I to do with thee? as Jdg 11:12; Sa2 16:10; Ezr 4:3; Mat 8:29. It therefore bespeaks a resentment, yet not at all inconsistent with the reverence and subjection which he paid to his mother, according to the fifth commandment (Luk 2:51); for there was a time when it was Levi's praise that he said to his father, I have not known him, Deu 33:9. Now this was intended to be, First, A check to his mother for interposing in a matter which was the act of his Godhead, which had no dependence on her, and which she was not the mother of. Though, as man, he was David's Son and hers; yet, as God, he was David's Lord and hers, and he would have her know it. The greatest advancements must not make us forget ourselves and our place, nor the familiarity to which the covenant of grace admits us breed contempt. irreverence, or any kind or degree of presumption. Secondly, It was an instruction to others of his relations (many of whom were present here) that they must never expect him to have any regard to his kindred according to the flesh, in his working miracles, or that therein he should gratify them, who in this matter were no more to him than other people. In the things of God we must not know faces. Thirdly, It is a standing testimony against that idolatry which he foresaw his church would in after-ages sink into, in giving undue honours to the virgin Mary, a crime which the Roman catholics, as they call themselves, are notoriously guilty of, when they call her the queen of heaven, the salvation of the world, their mediatrix, their life and hope; not only depending upon her merit and intercession, but beseeching her to command her Son to do them good: Monstra te esse matrem - Show that thou art his mother. Jussu matris impera salvatori - Lay thy maternal commands on the Saviour. Does he not here expressly say, when a miracle was to be wrought, even in the days of his humiliation, and his mother did but tacitly hint an intercession, Woman, what have I to do with thee? This was plainly designed either to prevent or aggravate such gross idolatry, such horrid blasphemy. The Son of God is appointed our Advocate with the Father; but the mother of our Lord was never designed to be our advocate with the Son.

[2.]The reason of this rebuke: Mine hour is not yet come. For every thing Christ did, and that was done to him, he had his hour, the fixed time and the fittest time, which was punctually observed. First, "Mine hour for working miracles is not yet come." Yet afterwards he wrought this, before the hour, because he foresaw it would confirm the faith of his infant disciples (Joh 2:11), which was the end of all his miracles: so that this was an earnest of the many miracles he would work when his hour was come. Secondly, "Mine hour of working miracles openly is not yet come; therefore do not talk of it thus publicly." Thirdly, "It not the hour of my exemption from thy authority yet come, now that I have begun to act as a prophet?" So Gregory Nyssen. Fourthly, "Mine hour for working this miracle is not yet come." His mother moved him to help them when the wine began to fail (so it may be read, Joh 2:3), but his hour was not yet come till it was quite spent, and there was a total want; not only to prevent any suspicion of mixing some of the wine that was left with the water, but to teach us that man's extremity is God's opportunity to appear for the help and relief of his people. Then his hour is come when we are reduced to the utmost strait, and know not what to do. This encouraged those that waited for him to believe that though his hour was not yet come it would come. Note, The delays of mercy are not to be construed the denials of prayer. At the end it shall speak.

(3.)Notwithstanding this, she encouraged herself with expectations that he would help her friends in this strait, for she bade the servants observe his orders, Joh 2:5.

[1.]She took the reproof very submissively, and did not reply to it. It is best not to deserve reproof from Christ, but next best to be meek and quiet under it, and to count it a kindness, Psa 141:5.

[2.]She kept her hope in Christ's mercy, that he would yet grant her desire. When we come to God in Christ for any mercy, two things discourage us: - First, Sense of our own follies and infirmities "Surely such imperfect prayers as ours cannot speed." Secondly, Sense of our Lord's frowns and rebukes. Afflictions are continued, deliverances delayed, and God seems angry at our prayers. This was the case of the mother of our Lord here, and yet she encourages herself with hope that he will at length give in an answer of peace, to teach us to wrestle with God by faith and fervency in prayer, even when he seems in his providence to walk contrary to us. We must against hope believe in hope, Rom 4:18.

[3.]She directed the servants to have an eye to him immediately, and not to make their applications to her, as it is probable they had done. She quits all pretensions to an influence upon him, or intercession with him; let their souls wait only on him, Psa 62:5.

[4.]She directed them punctually to observe his orders, without disputing, or asking questions. Being conscious to herself of a fault in prescribing to him, she cautions the servants to take heed of the same fault, and to attend both his time and his way for supply: "Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it, though you may think it ever so improper. If he saith, Give the guests water, when they call for wine, do it. If he saith, Pour out from the bottoms of the vessels that are spent, do it. He can make a few drops of wine multiply to so many draughts." Note, Those that expect Christ's favours must with an implicit obedience observe his orders. The way of duty is the way to mercy; and Christ's methods must not be objected against.

(4.)Christ did at length miraculously supply them; for he is often better than his word, but never worse.

[1.]The miracle itself was turning water into wine; the substance of water acquiring a new form, and having all the accidents and qualities of wine. Such a transformation is a miracle; but the popish transubstantiation, the substance changed, the accidents remaining the same, is a monster. By this Christ showed himself to be the God of nature, who maketh the earth to bring forth wine, Psa 109:14, Psa 109:15. The extracting of the blood of the grape every year from the moisture of the earth is no less a work of power, though, being according to the common law of nature, it is not such a work of wonder, as this. The beginning of Moses's miracles was turning water into blood (Exo 4:9; Exo 7:20), the beginning of Christ's miracles was turning water into wine; which intimates the difference between the law of Moses and the gospel of Christ. The curse of the law turns water into blood, common comforts into bitterness and terror; the blessing of the gospel turns water into wine. Christ hereby showed that his errand into the world was to heighten and improve creature-comforts to all believers, and make them comforts indeed. Shiloh is said to wash his garments in wine (Gen 49:11), the water for washing being turned into wine. And the gospel call is, Come ye to the waters, and buy wine, Isa 55:1.

[2.]The circumstances of it magnified it and freed it from all suspicion of cheat or collusion; for,

First, It was done in water-pots (Joh 2:6): There were set there six water-pots of stone. Observe, 1. For what use these water-pots were intended: for the legal purifications from ceremonial pollutions enjoined by the law of God, and many more by the tradition of the elders. The Jews eat not, except they wash often (Mar 7:3), and they used much water in their washing, for which reason here were six large water-pots provided. It was a saying among them, Qui mult utitur aqu in lavando, multas consequetur in hoc mundo divitias - He who uses much water in washing will gain much wealth in this world. 2. To what use Christ put them, quite different from what they were intended for; to be the receptacles of the miraculous wine. Thus Christ came to bring in the grace of the gospel, which is as wine, that cheereth God and man (Jdg 9:13), instead of the shadows of the law, which were as water, weak and beggarly elements. These were water-pots, that had never been used to have wine in them; and of stone, which is not apt to retain the scent of former liquors, if ever they had had wine in them. They contained two or three firkins apiece; two or three measures, baths, or ephahs; the quantity is uncertain, but very considerable. We may be sure that it was not intended to be all drank at this feast, but for a further kindness to the new-married couple, as the multiplied oil was to the poor widow, out of which she might pay her debt, and live of the rest, Kg2 4:7. Christ gives like himself, gives abundantly, according to his riches in glory. It is the penman's language to say, They contained two or three firkins, for the Holy Spirit could have ascertained just how much; thus (as Joh 6:19) teaching us to speak cautiously, and not confidently, of those things of which we have not good assurance.

Secondly, The water-pots were filled up to the brim by the servants at Christ's word, Joh 2:7. As Moses, the servant of the Lord, when God bade him, went to the rock, to draw water; so these servants, when Christ bade them, went to the water, to fetch wine. Note, Since no difficulties can be opposed to the arm of God's power, no improbabilities are to be objected against the word of his command.

Thirdly, The miracle was wrought suddenly, and in such a manner as greatly magnified it.

a.As soon as they had filled the water-pots, presently he said, Draw out now (Joh 2:8), and it was done, (a.) Without any ceremony, in the eye of the spectators. One would have thought, as Naaman, he should have come out, and stood, and called on the name of God, Kg2 5:11. No, he sits still in his place, says not a word, but wills the thing, and so works it. Note, Christ does great things and marvellous without noise, works manifest changes in a hidden way. Sometimes Christ, in working miracles, used words and signs, but it was for their sakes that stood by, Joh 11:42. (b.) Without any hesitation or uncertainty in his own breast. He did not say, Draw out now, and let me taste it, questioning whether the thing were done as he willed it or no; but with the greatest assurance imaginable, though it was his first miracle, he recommends it to the master of the feast first. As he knew what he would do, so he knew what he could do, and made no essay in his work; but all was good, very good, even in the beginning.

b.Our Lord Jesus directed the servants, (a.) To draw it out; not to let it alone in the vessel, to be admired, but to draw it out, to be drank. Note, [a.] Christ's works are all for use; he gives no man a talent to be buried, but to be traded with. Has he turned thy water into wine, given thee knowledge and grace? It is to profit withal; and therefore draw out now. [b.] Those that would know Christ must make trial of him, must attend upon him in the use of ordinary means, and then may expect extraordinary influence. That which is laid up for all that fear God is wrought for those that trust in him (Psa 31:19), that by the exercise of faith draw out what is laid up. (b.) To present it to the governor of the feast. Some think that this governor of the feast was only the chief guest, that sat at the upper end of the table; but, if so, surely our Lord Jesus should have had that place, for he was, upon all accounts, the principal guest; but it seems another had the uppermost room, probably one that loved it (Mat 23:6), and chose it, Luk 14:7. And Christ, according to his own rule, sat down in the lowest room; but, though he was not treated as the Master of the feast, he kindly approved himself a friend to the feast, and, if not its founder, yet its best benefactor. Others think that this governor was the inspector and monitor of the feast: the same with Plutarch's symposiarcha, whose office it was to see that each had enough, and none did exceed, and that there were no indecencies or disorders. Note, Feasts have need of governors, because too many, when they are at feasts, have not the government of themselves. Some think that this governor was the chaplain, some priest or Levite that craved a blessing and gave thanks, and Christ would have the cup brought to him, that he might bless it, and bless God for it; for the extraordinary tokens of Christ's presence and power were not to supersede, or jostle out, the ordinary rules and methods of piety and devotion.

Fourthly, The wine which was thus miraculously provided was of the best and richest kind, which was acknowledged by the governor of the feast; and that it was really so, and not his fancy, is certain, because he knew not whence it was, Joh 2:9, Joh 2:10. 1. It was certain that this was wine. The governor knew this when he drank it, though he knew not whence it was; the servants knew whence it was, but had not yet tasted it. if the taster had seen the drawing of it, or the drawers had had the tasting of it, something might have been imputed to fancy; but now no room is left for suspicion. 2. That it was the best wine. Note, Christ's works commend themselves even to those that know not their author. The products of miracles were always the best in their kind. This wine had a stronger body, and better flavour, than ordinary. This the governor of the feast takes notice of to the bridegroom, with an air of pleasantness, as uncommon. (1.) The common method was otherwise. Good wine is brought out to the best advantage at the beginning of a feast, when the guests have their heads clear and their appetites fresh, and can relish it, and will commend it; but when they have well drank, when their heads are confused, and their appetites palled, good wine is but thrown away upon them, worse will serve then. See the vanity of all the pleasures of sense; they soon surfeit, but never satisfy; the longer they are enjoyed, the less pleasant they grow. (2.) This bridegroom obliged his friends with a reserve of the best wine for the grace-cup: Thou hast kept the good wine until now; not knowing to whom they were indebted for this good wine, he returns the thanks of the table to the bridegroom. She did not know that I gave her corn and wine, Hos 2:8. Now, [1.] Christ, in providing thus plentifully for the guests, though he hereby allows a sober cheerful use of wine, especially in times of rejoicing (Neh 8:10), yet he does not invalidate his own caution, nor invade it, in the least, which is, that our hearts be not at any time, no not at a marriage feast, overcharged with surfeiting and drunkenness, Luk 21:34. When Christ provided so much good wine for them that had well drunk, he intended to try their sobriety, and to teach them how to abound, as well as how to want. Temperance per force is a thankless virtue; but if divine providence gives us abundance of the delights of sense, and divine grace enables us to use them moderately, this is self-denial that is praiseworthy. He also intended that some should be left for the confirmation of the truth of the miracle to the faith of others. And we have reason to think that the guests at this table were so well taught, or at least were now so well awed by the presence of Christ, that none of them abused this wine to excess. Theses two considerations, drawn from this story, may be sufficient at any time to fortify us against temptations to intemperance: First, That our meat and drink are the gifts of God's bounty to us, and we owe our liberty to use them, and our comfort in the use of them, to the mediation of Christ; it is therefore ungrateful and impious to abuse them. Secondly, That, wherever we are, Christ has his eye upon us; we should eat bread before God (Exo 18:12), and then we should not feed ourselves without fear. [2.] He has given us a specimen of the method he takes in dealing with those that deal with him, which is, to reserve the best for the last, and therefore they must deal upon trust. The recompence of their services and sufferings is reserved for the other world; it is a glory to be revealed. The pleasures of sin give their colour in the cup, but at the last bite; but the pleasures of religion will be pleasures for evermore.

III.In the conclusion of this story (Joh 2:11) we are told,

1.That this was the beginning of miracles which Jesus did. Many miracles had been wrought concerning him at his birth and baptism, and he himself was the greatest miracle of all; but this was the first that was wrought by him. He could have wrought miracles when he disputed with the doctors, but his hour was not come. He had power, but there was a time of the hiding of his power.

2.That herein he manifested his glory; hereby he proved himself to be the Son of God, and his glory to be that of the only-begotten of the Father. He also discovered the nature and end of his office; the power of a God, and the grace of a Saviour, appearing in all his miracles, and particularly in this, manifested the glory of the long-expected Messiah.

3.That his disciples believed on him. Those whom he had called (ch. 1), who had seen no miracle, and yet followed him, now saw this, shared in it, and had their faith strengthened by it. Note,

(1.)Even the faith that is true is at first but weak. The strongest men were once babes, so were the strongest Christians.

(2.)The manifesting of the glory of Christ is the great confirmation of the faith of Christians.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Seventeen Centuries of Reception

11 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

11 quotes · AD 311–1963
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
30040050060070080090010001100120013001400150016001700180019002000

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 373Ephrem the SyrianPost-NiceneSourceHYMNS ON VIRGINITY 33.1-2
Let Cana thank you for gladdening her banquet!
The bridegroom’s crown exalted you for exalting it,
And the bride’s crown belonged to your victory.
In her mirror allegories are expounded and traced,
For you portrayed your church in the bride,
And in her guests, yours are traced,
And in her magnificence she portrays your advent.
Let the feast thank him, for in multiplying his wine
Six miracles were beheld there:
The six wine jugs set aside for water
Into which they invited the King to pour his wine.
AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. xxii. [al. xxi.] 1.) Although He had said, Mine hour is not yet come, He afterwards did what His mother told Him, in order to show plainly, that He was not under subjection to the hour. For if He was, how could He have done this miracle before the hour appointed for it? In the next place, He wished to show honour to His mother, and mate it appear that He did not go counter to her eventually. He would not put her to shame in the presence of so many; especially as she had sent the servants to Him, that the petition might come from a number, and not from herself only; His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever He saith unto you, do it.

(Hom. xxii. [al. xxi.] 2.) Palestine being a dry country, with few fountains or wells, they used to fill waterpots with water, to prevent the necessity of going to the river, if they were unclean, and to have materials for washing at hand. To prevent any unbeliever from suspecting that a very thin wine was made by the dregs having been left in the vessels, and water poured in upon them, He says expressly, According to the manner of the purifying of the Jews: which shows that those vessels were never used to hold wine.

(Hom. xxii. 2) But why did He not work the miracle before they had filled the waterpots, which would have been much more wonderful; inasmuch as it is one thing to change the quality of some existing substance, another to make it that substance out of nothing? The latter miracle would be the more wonderful, but the former would be the more easy of belief. And this principle often acts as a check, to moderate the greatness of our Lord's miracles: He wishes to make them more credible, therefore He makes them less marvellous; a refutation this of the perverse doctrine of some, that He was a different Being from the Maker of the world. For we see He performs most of His miracles upon subject-matter already existing, whereas were He contrary to the Creator of the world, He would not use a material thus alien, to demonstrate His own power. He did not draw out the water Himself which He made wine, but ordered the servants to do so. This was for the sake of having witnesses of the miracle; And He saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast.
"But why," says one, "did not He Himself produce the water which He afterwards showed to be wine, instead of bidding the servants bring it?" For the very same reason; and also, that He might have those who drew it out to witness that what had been effected was no delusion since if any had been inclined to be shameless, those who ministered might have said to them, "We drew the water, we filled the vessels." And besides what we have mentioned, He thus overthrows those doctrines which spring up against the Church. For since there are some who say that the Creator of the world is another, and that the things which are seen are not His works, but those of a certain other opposing god, to curb these men's madness He doth most of His miracles on matter found at hand. Because, had the creator of these been opposed to Him, He would not have used what was another's to set forth His own power. But now to show that it is He who transmutes water in the vine plants, and who converts the rain by its passage through the root into wine, He effected that in a moment at the wedding which in the plant is long in doing.
"And why was it, that He did not the miracle before they filled them, which would have been more marvelous by far? for it is one thing to change given matter to a different quality, and another to create matter out of nothing." The latter would indeed have been more wonderful, but would not have seemed so credible to the many. And therefore He often purposely lessens the greatness of His miracles, that it may be the more readily received.
AD 430Augustine of Hippoas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Tr. ix. c. 7) A firkin is a certain measure; as urn, amphora, and the like. Metron is the Greek for measure: whence metretae. Two or three, is not to be taken to mean some holding two, others three, but the same vessels holding two or three.
Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim.
In the ancient times there was prophecy, and no times were left without the dispensation of prophecy. But the prophecy, since Christ was not understood therein, was water. For in water wine is in some manner latent. The apostle tells us what we are to understand by this water: "Even unto this day," saith he, "whilst Moses is read, that same veil is upon their heart; that it is not unveiled because it is done away in Christ. And when thou shalt have passed over," saith he, "to the Lord, the veil shall be taken away." By the veil he means the covering over of prophecy, so that it was not understood. When thou hast passed over to the Lord, the veil is taken away; so likewise is tastelessness taken away when thou hast passed over to the Lord; and what was water now becomes wine to thee. Read all the prophetic books; and if Christ be not understood therein, what canst thou find so insipid and silly? Understand Christ in them, and what thou readest not only has a taste, but even inebriates thee; transporting the mind from the body, so that forgetting the things that are past, thou reachest forth to the things that are before.

Wherefore, prophecy from ancient times, even from the time when the series of human births began to run onwards, was not silent concerning Christ; but the import of the prophecy was concealed therein, for as yet it was water.

When these words of the Gospel are understood, and they are certainly clear, all the mysteries which are latent in this miracle of the Lord will be laid open. Observe what He says, that it behoved the things to be fulfilled in Christ that were written of Him. Where were they written? "In the law," saith He, "and in the prophets, and in the Psalms." He omitted no part of the Old Scriptures. These were water; and hence the disciples were called irrational by the Lord, because as yet they tasted to them as water, not as wine. And how did He make of the water wine? When He opened their understanding, and expounded to them the Scriptures, beginning from Moses, through all the prophets; with which being now inebriated, they said, "Did not our hearts burn within us in the way, when He opened to us the Scriptures?" For they understood Christ in those books in which they knew Him not before. Thus our Lord Jesus Christ changed the water into wine, and that has now taste which before had not, that now inebriates which before did not. For if He had commanded the water to be poured out of the water-pots, and so Himself had put in the wine from the secret repositories of the creature, whence He made bread when He satisfied so many thousands; for five loaves were not in themselves sufficient to satisfy five thousand men, nor even to fill twelve baskets, but the omnipotence of the Lord was, as it were, a fountain of bread; so likewise He might, on the water being poured out, have poured in wine: but had He done this, He would appear to have rejected the Old Scriptures. When, however, He turns the water itself into wine, He shows us that the Old Scripture also is from Himself, for at His own command were the water-pots filled. It is from the Lord, indeed, that the Old Scripture also is; but it has no taste unless Christ is understood therein.
The ministers accomplish what is commanded, and by unspeakable might was the water changed into wine. For what is hard to Him Who can do all things? He that calleth into being things which are not, how will He weary, trans-ordering into what He will things already made? They marvel at the thing, as strange; for such are Christ's works to look upon. But the governor of the feast charges the bridegroom with expending what was better on the latter end of the feast, not unfitly, as appears to me, according to the narration of the story.
AD 465Maximus of TurinPost-NiceneSourceSERMON 23
Addressing the expectant servants, he said, “Fill the jars with water.” The servants promptly obeyed, and suddenly in a marvelous way the water began to acquire potency, take on color, emit fragrance and gain flavor—all at once it changed its nature completely! Now this transformation of the water from its own substance into another testified to the powerful presence of the Creator. Only he who had made it out of nothing could change water into something whose use was quite different. Dearly beloved, have no doubt that he who changed water into wine is the same as he who from the beginning has thickened it into snow and hardened it into ice. It is he who changed it into blood for the Egyptians and bade it flow from the dry rock for the thirsty Hebrews—the rock that, newly transformed into a spring, was like a mother’s breast refreshing with its gentle flow a countless multitude of people.
AD 804Alcuin of Yorkas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
The servants are the doctors of the New Testament, who interpret the holy Scripture to others spiritually; the ruler of the feast is some lawyer, as Nicodemus, Gamaliel, or Saul. When to the former then is committed the word of the Gospel, hid under the letter of the law, it is the water made wine, being set before the ruler of the feast. And the three rows of guests at table in the house of the marriage are properly mentioned; the Church consisting of three orders of believers, the married, the continent, and the doctors. Christ has kept the good wine until now, i. e. He has deferred the Gospel till this, the sixth age.
There is an activity of God displayed throughout creation, a wholesale activity let us say which men refuse to recognize. The miracles done by God incarnate, living as a man in Palestine, perform the very same things as this wholesale activity, but at a different speed and on a smaller scale. One of their chief purposes is that men, having seen a thing done by personal power on the small scale, may recognize, when they see the same thing done on the large scale, that the power behind it is also personal – is indeed the very same person who lived among us two thousand years ago. The miracles in fact are a retelling in small letters of the very same story which is written across the whole world in letters too large for some of us to see...

God creates the vine and teaches it to draw up water by its roots and, with the aid of the sun, to turn water into a juice which will ferment and take on certain qualities. Thus every year, from Noah’s time till ours, God turns water into wine. That, men fail to see. Either like the Pagans they refer the process to some finite spirit, Bacchus or Dionysus: or else, like the moderns, they attribute real and ultimate causality to the chemical and other material phenomena which are all that our senses can discover in it. But when Christ at Cana makes water into wine, the mask is off. The miracle has only half its effect if it only convinces us that Christ is God: it will have its full effect if whenever we see a vineyard or drink a glass of wine we remember that here works He who sat at a wedding party in Cana.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying John 2:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8