TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Job 34:31–37. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
In these verses,
I.Elihu instructs Job what he should say under his affliction, Job 34:31, Job 34:32.
Having reproved him for his peevish passionate words, he here puts better words into his mouth. When we reprove for what is amiss we must direct to what is good, that our reproofs may be the reproofs of instruction, Pro 6:23. He does not impose it upon Job to use these words, but recommends it to him, as that which was meet to be said. In general, he would have him repent of his misconduct, and indecent expressions, under his affliction. Job's other friends would have had him own himself a wicked man, and by overdoing they undid. Elihu will oblige him only to own that he had, in the management of this controversy, spoken unadvisedly with his lips. Let us remember this, in giving reproofs, and not make the matter worse than it is; for the stretching of the crime may defeat the prosecution. Elihu drives the right nail, and speeds accordingly. He directs Job,
1.To humble himself before God for his sins, and to accept the punishment of them: "I have borne chastisement. What I suffer comes justly upon me, and therefore I will bear it, and not only justify God in it, but acknowledge his goodness." Many are chastised that do not bear chastisement, do not bear it well, and so, in effect, do not bear it at all. Penitents, if sincere, will take all well that God does, and will bear chastisement as a medicinal operation intended for good.
2.To pray to God to discover his sins to him (Job 34:32): "That which I see not teach thou me. Lord, upon the review, I find much amiss in me and much done amiss by me, but I have reason to fear there is much more that I am not aware of, greater abominations, which through ignorance, mistake, and partiality to myself, I do not yet see; Lord, give me to see it, awaken by conscience to do its office faithfully." A good man is willing to know the worst of himself, and particularly, under affliction, desires to be told wherefore God contends with him and what God designs in correcting him.
3.To promise reformation (Job 34:31): I will not offend any more. "If I have done iniquity (or seeing that I have), I will do so no more; whatever thou shalt discover to me to have been amiss, by thy grace I will amend it for the future." This implies a confession that we have offended, true remorse and godly sorrow for the offence, and a humble compliance with God's design in afflicting us, which is to separate between us and our sins. The penitent here completes his repentance; for it is not enough to be sorry for our sins, but we must go and sin no more, and, as here, bind ourselves with the bond of a fixed resolution never more to return to folly. This is meet to be said in a stedfast purpose, and meet to be said to God in a solemn promise and vow.
II.He reasons with him concerning his discontent and uneasiness under his affliction, Job 34:23.
We are ready to think every thing that concerns us should be just as we would have it; but Elihu here shows,
1.That it is absurd and unreasonable to expect this: "Should it be according to thy mind? No, what reason for that?" Elihu here speaks with a great deference to the divine will and wisdom, and a satisfaction therein: it is highly fit that every thing should be according to God's mind. He speaks also with a just disdain of the pretensions of those that are proud, and would be their own carvers: Should it be according to thy mind? Should we always have the good we have a mind to enjoy? We should then wrongfully encroach upon others and foolishly ensnare ourselves. Must we never be afflicted, because we have no mind to it? Is it fit that sinners should feel no smart, that scholars should be under no discipline? Or, if we must be afflicted, is it fit that we should choose what rod we will be beaten with? No; it is fit that every thing should be according to God's mind, and not ours; for he is the Creator, and we are creatures. He is infinitely wise and knowing; we are foolish and short-sighted. He is in one mind; we are in many.
2.That it is in vain, and to no purpose, to expect it: "He will recompense it whether thou refuse or whether thou choose. God will take his own way, fulfil his own counsel, and recompense according to the sentence of his own justice, whether thou art pleased or displeased; he will neither ask thy leave nor ask thy advice, but, what he pleases, that will he do. It is therefore thy wisdom to be easy, and make a virtue of necessity; make the best of that which is, because it is out of thy power to make it otherwise. If thou pretend to choose and refuse," that is, "to prescribe to God and except against what he does, so will not I - I will acquiesce in all he does; and therefore speak what thou knowest; say what thou wilt do, whether thou wilt oppose or submit. The matter lies plainly before thee; be at a point; thou art in God's hand, not in mine."
III.He appeals to all intelligent indifferent persons whether there was not a great deal of sin and folly in that which Job said.
1. He would have the matter thoroughly examined, and brought to an issue (Job 34:36): "My desire is that Job may be tried unto the end. If any will undertake to justify what he has said, let them do it; if not, let us all agree to bear our testimony against it." Many understand it of his trial by afflictions: "Let his troubles be continued till he be thoroughly humbled, and his proud spirit brought down, till he be made to see his error and to retract what he has so presumptuously said against God and his providence. Let the trial be continued till the end be obtained." 2. He appeals both to God and man, and desires the judgment of both upon it. (1.) Some read v. 36 as an appeal to God: O, my Father! let Job be tried. So the margin of our Bibles, for the same word signifies my desire and my father; and some suppose that he lifted up his eyes when he said this, meaning, "O my Father who art in heaven! let Job be tried till he be subdued." When we are praying for the benefit of afflictions either to ourselves or others we must eye God as a Father, because they are fatherly corrections and a part of our filial education, Heb 12:7. (2.) He appeals to the by-standers (Job 34:34): "Let men of understanding tell me whether they can put any more favourable construction upon Job's words than I have put, and whether he has not spoken very ill and ought not to cry, Peccavi - I have done wrong." In what Job had said he thought it appeared, [1.] That he did not rightly understand himself, but had talked foolishly, Job 34:35. He cannot say that Job is without knowledge and wisdom; but, in this matter, he has spoken without knowledge, and, whatever his heart is, his words were without prudence. What he said to his wife may be retorted upon himself (He speaks as one of the foolish men speak) and for the same reason, Shall we not receive evil as well as good at God's hand? Job 2:10. Sometimes we need and deserve those reproofs ourselves which we have given to others. Those that reproach God's wisdom really reproach their own. [2.] That he had not a due regard to God, but had talked wickedly. If what he had said be tried to the end, that is, if one put it to the utmost stretch and make the worst of it, it will be found, First, That he has taken part with God's enemies: His answers have been for wicked men; that is, what he had said tended to strengthen the hands and harden the hearts of wicked people in their wickedness, he having carried the matter of their prosperity much further than he needed. Let wicked men, like Baal, plead for themselves if they will, but far be it from us that we should answer for them, or say any thing in favour of them. Secondly, That he has insulted God's friends, and hectored over them: "He clappeth his hands among us; and, if he be not thoroughly tried and humbled, will grow yet more insolent and imperious, as if he had gotten the day and silenced us all." To speak ill is bad enough, but to clap our hands and triumph in it when we have done, as if error and passion had won the victory, is much worse. Thirdly, That he has spoken against God himself, and, by standing to what he had said, added rebellion to his sin. To speak, though but one word, against God, by whom we speak and for whom we ought to speak, is a great sin; what is it then to multiply words against him, as if we would out-talk him? What is it to repeat them, instead of unsaying them? Those that have sinned, and, when they are called to repent, thus go on frowardly, add rebellion to their sin and make it exceedingly sinful. Errare possum, Haereticus esse nolo - I may fall into error, but I will not plunge into heresy.
Historical interpretation
Two Centuries of Reception
2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
He did not say, in an iniquitous and impious manner, but “for a long time,” showing that we must not argue with God for a long time. If, when we are in the presence of a king, we do not dare argue with him for a long time, even more so we must behave before God.
6. Lo! how he lifts up even in words of cursing, that which he had before conceived of the swellings of arrogance. But he would perhaps wish for the force of a merciful probation, if he had believed that he had stood firm in probation. In order then that the malice of his cruelty may openly appear, he prays, that he may still be tried by scourges, who he complains had already fallen during his scourges. He first stated what he thought, in order that what he wished might be more plainly understood. He requires him to be still smitten, whom he accuses of having sinned already under the hand of the Smiter. These are wishes peculiar to the haughty, to pray that the lives of those who are suffering may be more severely examined, because the more just they are in their own eyes, the more hardened are they in others’ sufferings. For they know not how to take to them the feeling of the other’s infirmity, and to feel pity for their neighbour’s weakness, as they do for their own. For since they think highly of themselves, they do not at all condescend to the humble. Eliu believed that blessed Job had been smitten for his sin, and therefore believed that no bowels of compassion were to be shown to him, even in the midst of so many sorrows. But when men, who are truly holy, behold any one smitten, even for his faults, though they reprove some of his inordinate doings, yet they sympathize with some of his sufferings; and they are so skilled in keeping down swellings, as yet to know how to relieve wounds, in order that when their hardnesses are softened, their infirmities may be strengthened. But because, on the other hand, haughty men have no bowels of love, they not only do not sympathize with the righteous when suffering, but moreover afflict them, under pretence of proper reproof, and they either exaggerate trifling faults, if there are any in them, or pervert by wrong construction those points which are really good.
7. Although even holy teachers are frequently wont to exaggerate the vices of offenders, and from some outward signs to dive into secret faults, in order from the smallest defects to discover greater. Whence it is said to Ezekiel, Son of man, dig in the wall. Where he presently subjoined, And when I had digged in the wall, there appeared a door; and He said unto me, Go in, and see the most wicked abominations that they do here. And I went in and saw, and behold every likeness of creeping things, and the abominations of animals, and all the idols of the house of Israel, were painted on the wall. [Ez. 8, 8-10] For by Ezekiel is represented the person of rulers; by the wall the hardness of subjects. And what is the digging into the wall, except laying bare hardness of heart by sharp reproofs? For when he had dug into it, there appeared a door; because when hardness of heart is opened by sharp reproofs, a kind of door appears, through which all the secret thoughts of the person, who is reproved, can be seen. Whence it also well follows in that place, And He said to me, Go in, and see the most wicked abominations which they do here. A person enters as it were to behold abominations, who on examining certain signs which appear outwardly, so penetrates the hearts of those under him, that all their unlawful thoughts are made plain to him. Whence he added, And I went in and saw; and behold every likeness of creeping things, and the abomination of animals. By reptiles are especially understood worldly thoughts: but by animals, those which rise a little above the earth, but still seek for the rewards of an earthly recompense. For reptiles cling to the earth with the whole of their body, but though animals are in their belly suspended from the earth, yet they are by the appetite of gluttony ever bending to the earth. Reptiles therefore are within the wall, when thoughts which are never elevated from worldly desires, are revolved in the mind. Animals also are within the wall, when if any just and becoming thoughts are conceived, they subserve the pursuit of worldly gains and honours, and of themselves indeed they are already suspended, as it were, from the earth, but by their ambition, they still bring themselves down to the basest objects, as by gluttonous desire. Whence it is also well subjoined, And all the idols of the house of Israel were painted on the wall. For it is written, And covetousness which is idolatry. [Col. 3, 5] After the animals, therefore, the idols are properly described, because, though they arise themselves, as it were, from the earth by becoming conduct, yet they bring themselves down to the earth again by dishonourable ambition. But it is well said, Were painted; because while the appearances of outward objects are drawn inward, whatever is thought in imagination is painted, as it were, on the heart.
8. We must therefore observe, that first a hole, and afterwards a door, is seen in the wall: and that then at last the secret abomination is laid open: because, doubtless, the signs of every sin are first observed without, next the door of detected iniquity is laid open; and then at last all the evil is disclosed, which is lurking within. Therefore even holy teachers are wont to examine severely into minute points, in order to arrive at greater hidden faults, from outer faults at the very surface. They utter words of sharp reproof, in order to root out the thorns of deadly thought, and when they act thus, they rage with the love of charity, and are not puffed up with the swelling of pride. For they are ready to die for those, whom they afflict as if raging even to the death. In their thoughts they retain this affection, while they assume persecution in appearance. They insinuate sound truths in their preaching, they announce and warn against evils, and do not as Eliu pray for, and desire them. They are sometimes so prompt in reproof against those committed to their care, as though they had nothing of calmness: but are so tranquil in affection, as though no warmth could kindle them. For they greatly fear, that if they should cease to reprove the wicked, they would be punished themselves for their damnation. And when warmed into words of reproof, they unwillingly have recourse to them, but yet prepare them, as a defence for themselves, before their strict Judge.
9. Whence it is said again also to the same Ezekiel, Son of man, take thee a brick, and thou shall place it before thee, and thou shall describe on it the city Jerusalem, and thou shalt build munitions, and heap up a mound, and set a camp against it, and place battering rams around it. And take thou an iron pan, and thou shalt place it as an iron wall between thee and the city. [Ezek. 4, 1-3] For whom does Ezekiel represent, but rulers? And to him it is said, Take thee a brick, and thou shall place it before thee, and thou shalt describe on it the city Jerusalem. For holy teachers take to themselves a brick, when they lay hold of the earthly heart of hearers, in order to instruct it. And they place this brick before them, because they guard it with the entire attention of their anxiety. And they are ordered also to describe the city Jerusalem thereon, because they earnestly endeavour in their preaching to show to earthly hearts, how great is the vision of heavenly peace. And it is well said to him also, And thou shalt set in array the siege against it, and thou shall build munitions. For holy teachers set the siege in array against the brick, on which the city Jerusalem is described, when they show to an earthly mind, now seeking after its heavenly country, what an opposition of sins assails it in the season of this life. For when it is pointed out, how each separate sin lays ambush against the mind, the siege is set, as it were, against Jerusalem by the voice of the preacher. But because they suggest not only how sins lay wait and assault the mind, but also how virtues, when guarded, strengthen it, it is rightly subjoined, And thou shall build munitions. For a holy preacher builds munitions, when he ceases not to teach what virtues oppose what vices. And because the contests of temptation frequently become stronger as virtues increase, it is still rightly added, And thou shalt heap up a mound, and set a camp against it, and place battering rams around it. For every preacher raises up a mound, when he points out the mass of increasing temptation. And he raises a camp against Jerusalem, when he points out to the right disposition of his hearers the circumventions of the crafty enemy, as snares which are beyond their understanding. And he places battering rams around, when he makes known the stings of temptations which surround us on every side in this life, and pierce through the wall of virtues.
10. Where it is well added, And take thee an iron pan, and thou shalt place it as an iron wall between thee and the city. For, by the pan is set forth parching, and by the iron, strength. But what so parches and tortures the mind of a ruler and teacher as zeal for the Lord? Whence also Paul was burned by the parching of this pan, when saying, Who is weak, and I am not weak? who is offended, and I burn not? [2 Cor. 11, 29] And because whoever is kindled with a zeal for God against sinners, is constantly protected by a strong guard within, in order that he may not be condemned for neglecting his charge of preaching and ruling, it is well said, Thou shall place it as an iron wall between thee and the city. For the iron pan is placed as an iron wall between the Prophet and the city, because when teachers now display a resolute zeal, they hold afterwards the same zeal, as a strong bulwark, between themselves and their hearers; that they may not then be given up to punishment, if they have been now negligent in reproof. The same Prophet heard that he was to hold this pan between himself and his hearers, when the voice of God addressed him before, saying, If thou hast announced to the wicked, and he have turned not from his wickedness, and from his evil way, he himself shall die in his wickedness, but thou hast delivered thy soul. [Ez. 3, 19] Paul had placed this pan, as a wall between himself and his disciples, when saying, I am pure from the blood of all of you: for I have not shunned to declare unto you the whole counsel of God. It is, therefore, necessary that teachers should seek to be burned up now with ardent zeal, that they may not be compelled to suffer torments in the fire of hell for the sloth of negligence.
11. But we owe one duty to those who are unrighteous and subject to us, and another to those who are righteous and not subject to us. For fear should enkindle us to reprove those, and to take good care of the accounts we have to render. But the thought of equity should incline us to reverence these. But haughty men, because they know not this kind of discretion, exhibit the same conduct to those who are righteous, and not subject to them, as they see good preachers display towards those who are unrighteous, and subject to them. And when they unjustly launch out into warmth of invective, they venture even on words of malediction. For, because they do not love their neighbours as themselves, they cease not to wish for their neighbours that, which they are afraid of befalling themselves. Whence Eliu, venting his secret hatred in open malediction, exclaims, O my Father, let Job be tried even to the end, cease not from the man of iniquity. He calls him a man of iniquity, whom God, by a testimony from on high, pronounces righteous above all men. And because many things are still subjoined, from this want of discrimination, I think that they must be run through briefly. For sayings, which are wanting in weight, do not require any careful exposition.
Continue studying Job 34:36 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Job 34:36 captures Elihu's fervent declaration that Job's profound suffering should persist "unto the end." As the youngest and most assertive of Job's counselors, Elihu perceives Job's responses to his trials as defiant and impious, aligning him with those who question God's justice and sovereignty. Elihu believes this necessitates further divine scrutiny and discipline to expose and purge Job's perceived iniquity, viewing the prolonged affliction as a necessary crucible for revelation and rectification.
Context
Literary Context
Elihu's extensive discourse, commencing in Job 32, marks a significant turning point in the Book of Job. Frustrated by the stalemate between Job and his three older friends, Elihu presents himself as a divinely inspired arbiter, offering a fresh, albeit ultimately flawed, perspective on suffering. He vehemently defends God's righteousness and omnipotence, arguing that God is too just to act capriciously and that affliction often serves as a pedagogical or refining process. Chapter 34 continues this theological defense, with Elihu systematically refuting Job's perceived accusations against God's justice. Job 34:36 serves as a climactic and severe pronouncement within Elihu's argument, expressing his conviction that Job's trial must continue until Job's character is fully exposed and rectified in Elihu's eyes, thereby justifying God's actions and setting the stage for Elihu's subsequent pronouncements on divine majesty.
Historical & Cultural Context
The Book of Job is a profound exploration of the problem of suffering within the framework of ancient Near Eastern wisdom literature. In this cultural milieu, a prevailing theological paradigm, often termed retribution theology, posited a direct and causal link between one's moral conduct and their material well-being: righteousness led to prosperity, while wickedness resulted in suffering. Job's friends, including Elihu, largely operate within this interpretive framework, struggling to reconcile Job's apparent innocence with his immense calamity. While Elihu introduces nuances, emphasizing suffering as discipline rather than solely punishment, he still adheres to the core tenet that such intense affliction must be linked to sin, whether overt or hidden. The cultural expectation was that a person enduring such trials must confess their transgression to alleviate their suffering. Elihu's desire for Job to be "tried unto the end" reflects this deep-seated belief in divine judgment and the conviction that prolonged, intense suffering could serve as a crucible for purification or the revelation of concealed iniquity.
Key Themes
Job 34:36 significantly contributes to several overarching themes in the Book of Job. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Divine Justice and Sovereignty, as Elihu passionately defends God's absolute righteousness and omnipotence, asserting that God cannot act unjustly. Elihu's argument, though misapplied to Job, reflects a deep conviction in God's perfect governance, a theme powerfully affirmed in God's speeches from the whirlwind in Job 38-41. Secondly, the verse highlights Suffering as Discipline and Refinement. Elihu views Job's continued affliction not as random, but as a necessary process to expose and purge his perceived self-righteousness and defiance, aligning with a biblical concept of suffering as a means of spiritual growth and purification (e.g., Hebrews 12:5-11). Finally, the phrase "answers for wicked men" emphasizes The Danger of Ungodly Speech. Elihu strongly condemns Job's complaints and self-defense, equating them with the words of those who rebel against God, thereby underscoring the profound biblical emphasis on the power and responsibility of our words before God, a theme prevalent throughout wisdom literature (e.g., Proverbs 18:21).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb (H974, בָּחַן) signifies to test, prove, examine, or scrutinize. It is frequently used in the context of assaying metals, implying a rigorous process of purification or determining genuineness by fire. In Elihu's mouth, it denotes a thorough, perhaps painful, investigation designed to expose Job's true character and, in Elihu's estimation, his hidden iniquity or self-righteousness. It suggests a process that will continue until the desired outcome, whether Job's confession or purification, is achieved.
This term (H5331, נֵצַח) carries the meaning of a goal, a distant point, or perpetually. Adverbially, as used here, it means "continually," "always," or "to the most distant point of view." Elihu's use of this word intensifies his desire for the testing to be exhaustive and complete, implying that Job's trial should not cease until its full purpose (as Elihu perceives it) has been realized, leaving no doubt about Job's character or God's justice.
This phrase combines ʼâven (H205, אָוֶן), meaning "nothingness," "trouble," "vanity," or "wickedness" (often implying iniquity or idolatry), with ʼĕnôwsh (H582, אֱנוֹשׁ), meaning "man" (often emphasizing man's mortality or frailty). Together, anshei aven (men of iniquity/wickedness) is a highly condemnatory designation. Elihu is accusing Job not merely of speaking foolishly, but of speaking in a manner characteristic of those who practice evil or rebellion against God, thereby justifying the continuation of his severe trials.
Verse Breakdown
"My desire [is that] Job may be tried unto the end"
Elihu expresses a strong, personal conviction or wish. He believes that Job's prolonged and intense suffering should not cease but rather continue to its full conclusion. The purpose of this continued "trying" (testing or examining) is, in Elihu's mind, to thoroughly expose Job's character, particularly what Elihu perceives as Job's hidden flaws, self-righteousness, or rebellious spirit. It implies a process of purification or revelation, much like a refiner's fire, that must run its complete course.
"because of [his] answers for wicked men"
This clause provides Elihu's justification for his desire for Job's prolonged testing. He attributes Job's need for further scrutiny directly to Job's verbal responses to his suffering and his friends' accusations. Elihu views Job's words—his complaints, his assertions of innocence, and his challenges to God's justice—as being akin to the speech of impious or rebellious individuals. He sees Job's verbal defense as evidence of a wicked heart, deserving of continued divine scrutiny and discipline.
Literary Devices
Elihu's statement in Job 34:36 employs several potent literary devices. There is clear Accusation, as Elihu directly charges Job with speaking like "wicked men," a severe indictment that aims to discredit Job's claims of innocence. This accusation also contains elements of Hyperbole, as Elihu exaggerates the nature of Job's complaints, perhaps to underscore the gravity of questioning divine justice from his perspective. The concept of being "tried unto the end" functions as a Metaphor for a refining process, where suffering is the crucible intended to purify or reveal true character, a common image in biblical wisdom literature. Furthermore, from the broader narrative perspective of the Book of Job, Elihu's certainty and desire for Job's continued suffering introduces a profound layer of Dramatic Irony. The reader knows, and God later confirms, that Job is righteous, and his suffering is not a direct result of personal sin. Elihu's confident pronouncements, therefore, stand in stark contrast to the divine reality, highlighting the limitations of human wisdom in discerning God's complex and often mysterious purposes.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Elihu's assertion in Job 34:36, while ultimately a flawed human judgment of Job's specific situation, nonetheless touches upon profound biblical themes concerning God's sovereignty, the nature of testing, and the significance of our words. The idea that God "tries" or tests His people for a purpose is a consistent thread throughout Scripture, often for purification, strengthening faith, or revealing true character, even if not always as a direct punishment for sin. Elihu's error lies in his rigid application of retribution theology to Job's unique case and his presumption to fully understand God's motives. However, his strong emphasis on God's justice and the seriousness of human speech resonates with the broader biblical witness that God is righteous in all His ways and that our words carry significant weight before Him. The verse thus invites reflection on how we respond to trials and the kind of language we employ when wrestling with divine providence.
Reflection and Application
Elihu's desire for Job to be "tried unto the end" serves as a potent, albeit misdirected, reminder that our responses to suffering are critically important. While God's purposes in allowing trials are multifaceted and often beyond our full comprehension, our attitudes and words during such times reveal much about our faith and trust in Him. Do we, like Elihu accused Job, align ourselves with those who complain bitterly against God, or do we seek to understand His hand, even when it is heavy? This verse challenges us to examine our own hearts when affliction strikes, considering whether our words reflect humility, patience, and continued trust in God's goodness, or if they betray a spirit of accusation, self-pity, or rebellion. It also prompts us to be cautious and humble in judging others' suffering, recognizing that human wisdom, even well-intentioned, often falls short of divine understanding and can even inflict further pain. Ultimately, our aim should be to emerge from trials with a purer faith and a deeper reliance on God, not a hardened heart, trusting that God's ultimate purpose is always our good and His glory.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Is Elihu's assessment of Job in Job 34:36 accurate from God's perspective?
No, not entirely. While Elihu correctly defends God's absolute justice and the principle that suffering can serve as discipline or a test, his specific application to Job is flawed. God Himself declares Job to be "blameless and upright" (e.g., Job 1:8). Elihu, like the other friends, operates under the assumption that Job's suffering must be a direct consequence of his sin or a necessary refining process due to his "wicked" words. However, the book's prologue reveals that Job's suffering was a test of his integrity, initiated by Satan and permitted by God, not a punishment for specific iniquity. God's later vindication of Job in Job 42:7-8 explicitly rebukes the friends, including Elihu by implication, for not speaking "what is right" about Him, highlighting the limitations of their human theological framework.
What does it mean for Job to be "tried unto the end"?
From Elihu's perspective, "tried unto the end" (Hebrew: bachan netsach) implies a thorough and complete process of testing, examination, or purification. It suggests that Job's suffering should continue until his true character is fully revealed, his perceived self-righteousness is broken, and he acknowledges his supposed sin. Elihu believes this intense scrutiny is necessary because Job's responses have been defiant and akin to those of "wicked men." It's a desire for the trial to run its full course, achieving its intended (in Elihu's mind) purpose of exposing and correcting Job's spiritual state. While Elihu's specific judgment of Job is incorrect, the broader biblical concept of God testing His people to refine their faith is a valid one (e.g., Deuteronomy 8:2).
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While Elihu's counsel to Job is ultimately incomplete and misapplied, the concept of being "tried unto the end" finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in Jesus Christ. Unlike Job, who was righteous but still a sinner, Jesus was perfectly righteous and without sin, yet He was "tried unto the end" in a way no human could ever endure. He faced the ultimate test of obedience and suffering, enduring the cross not for His own sin, but as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. His "answers" were never for wicked men, but always in perfect submission to the Father's will, even unto death (Philippians 2:8). Christ's suffering was the ultimate trial that fully exposed His perfect love and obedience, securing salvation for all who believe. Through His complete endurance of the trial, He became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey Him. Thus, while Elihu wished for Job's suffering to continue to expose perceived sin, Christ's suffering "unto the end" was the means by which sin was atoned for, allowing us, though once wicked, to be declared righteous in Him (Romans 5:19) and to find true rest from our own trials in His finished work (Matthew 11:28-30).