Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Then the city was broken up, and all the men of war fled, and went forth out of the city by night by the way of the gate between the two walls, which was by the king's garden; (now the Chaldeans were by the city round about:) and they went by the way of the plain.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Then the city H5892 was broken up H1234, and all the men H582 of war H4421 fled H1272, and went forth H3318 out of the city H5892 by night H3915 by the way H1870 of the gate H8179 between the two walls H2346, which was by the king's H4428 garden H1588;(now the Chaldeans H3778 were by the city H5892 round about H5439:) and they went H3212 by the way H1870 of the plain H6160.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
they broke through into the city. All the soldiers fled and left the city by night through the gate between the two walls, near the king's garden. Because the Kasdim were surrounding the city, they took the route through the 'Aravah.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then the city was breached; and though the Chaldeans had surrounded the city, all the men of war fled the city by night by way of the gate between the two walls near the king’s garden. They headed toward the Arabah,
Ask
American Standard Version
Then a breach was made in the city, and all the men of war fled, and went forth out of the city by night by the way of the gate between the two walls, which was by the king’s garden (now the Chaldeans were against the city round about); and they went toward the Arabah.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Then a breach was made in the city, and all the men of war fled, and went out of the city by night by the way of the gate between the two walls, which was by the king’s garden; (now the Kasdim were against the city all around;) and they went toward the Arabah.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then the citie was broken vp and all the men of warre fled, and went out of the citie by night, by the way of the gate betweene the two walles, which was by the kings garden: (now the Caldeans were by the citie round about) and they went by the way of the wildernes.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
then is the city broken up, and all the men of war flee, and go forth from the city by night, the way of the gate between the two walls, that is by the king's garden--and the Chaldeans are by the city round about--and they go the way of the plain.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
The Fall of Jerusalem and Zedekiah's Capture
The Fall of Jerusalem and Zedekiah's Capture View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 20,284 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 52:7 vividly captures the climactic and tragic moment of Jerusalem's fall to the Babylonian forces, detailing the desperate, clandestine escape attempt of King Zedekiah and his military personnel. As the city walls were violently breached, the king and his men, completely surrounded by the Chaldean army, sought to flee under the cover of night through a specific, hidden route leading towards the Jordan plain – a futile and ultimately failed effort to evade the inevitable divine judgment that had decisively befallen Judah.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Jeremiah 52 functions as a historical appendix to the prophetic book of Jeremiah, largely reiterating and occasionally expanding upon the accounts found in Jeremiah 39 and 2 Kings 25. This chapter provides a detailed, factual account of Jerusalem's final siege, its destruction, and the subsequent exile of its inhabitants, thereby serving to validate the dire prophecies of judgment delivered throughout the preceding chapters. Verse 7 specifically describes the breaching of the city's formidable defenses and the immediate, desperate flight of King Zedekiah and his soldiers. This dramatic scene sets the stage for his swift capture and the definitive end of the Judean monarchy, as meticulously detailed in the verses immediately following, such as Jeremiah 52:8-11.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Jeremiah 52:7 transpired during the final, brutal stages of the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem, which had commenced in the ninth year of King Zedekiah's reign and endured for approximately two and a half years, as noted in Jeremiah 52:4-5. The Chaldeans (Babylonians), under the formidable King Nebuchadnezzar, had meticulously surrounded the city, effectively cutting off all supplies and avenues of escape. Jerusalem, a heavily fortified city designed to withstand prolonged sieges, ultimately found its defenses insufficient against the relentless Babylonian assault, further exacerbated by severe famine and internal strife. The specific mention of "the gate between the two walls" and "the king's garden" points to recognizable topographical features of ancient Jerusalem, likely indicating a postern gate or a concealed exit used for emergencies or private royal access to a garden outside the main defenses. This detail underscores the king's desperate and secretive attempt to use a less obvious route to escape the overwhelming encircling enemy.

  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully encapsulates several overarching themes central to the book of Jeremiah and the broader prophetic narrative. Firstly, it starkly underscores the inevitability of divine judgment against Judah's persistent idolatry, covenant unfaithfulness, and disobedience, thereby fulfilling Jeremiah's dire warnings that the city would fall and its king would be captured, as forcefully prophesied in passages like Jeremiah 32:28-29. Secondly, it vividly portrays the futility of human resistance and escape when confronted with God's determined and sovereign judgment. The "men of war," whose duty was to defend the city, were instead seen fleeing, symbolizing the complete collapse of Judah's political and military strength. Finally, the scene marks the definitive end of the independent Kingdom of Judah and the Davidic monarchy in Jerusalem, ushering in the painful and transformative era of the Babylonian Exile, a period of profound theological reflection and reorientation for the covenant people.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • broken up (Hebrew, bâqaʻ', H1234): This primitive root signifies a violent cleaving, rending, or tearing open. In the context of the city, it emphasizes the forceful and destructive penetration of Jerusalem's formidable defenses by the Babylonian army. It conveys a sense of the walls being not merely breached, but violently ripped apart, highlighting the overwhelming power of the invaders and the utter collapse of the city's security. This word can also mean to "break forth" or "burst," suggesting the sudden and overwhelming nature of the breakthrough.
  • fled (Hebrew, bârach', H1272): This word denotes a sudden, swift bolting or fleeing away, often implying a desperate, hurried escape. It captures the panic and urgency of the king and his soldiers as they realized the city's defenses had failed, emphasizing their immediate and frantic attempt to evade capture rather than engage in further resistance. The term also carries a sense of being "chased away" or "put to flight," underscoring the relentless pursuit by the enemy.
  • Chaldeans (Hebrew, Kasdîy', H3778): This term refers to the inhabitants of Chaldea, specifically the Neo-Babylonian Empire, which was the dominant superpower of the ancient Near East at this time. Their presence "round about" the city underscores the complete encirclement and overwhelming military advantage they held, making any escape attempt exceedingly perilous and ultimately futile. The term can also refer to astrologers, highlighting the perceived wisdom and power of this people group in the ancient world.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Then the city was broken up": This clause marks the critical turning point of the siege. After a prolonged period of endurance, the Babylonian forces finally succeeded in breaching Jerusalem's walls, signifying the catastrophic collapse of its defenses and the imminent fall of the city. This was the moment of no return for the inhabitants, sealing their fate.
  • "and all the men of war fled, and went forth out of the city by night": Upon the breach, the military forces, including King Zedekiah, abandoned their defensive positions. Their flight "by night" indicates a desperate attempt to use the cover of darkness for concealment, hoping to slip past the besieging army unnoticed. This act highlights their desperation, the complete loss of morale, and the strategic disadvantage they faced.
  • "by the way of the gate between the two walls, which [was] by the king's garden": This highly specific detail describes the clandestine escape route. The "gate between the two walls" suggests a concealed or less-guarded passage, possibly a postern gate, designed for emergency exits or private access. Its location "by the king's garden" further implies a route known only to the royal household or inner circle, underscoring the secretive and desperate nature of the flight, a last-ditch effort for survival.
  • "(now the Chaldeans [were] by the city round about:)": This parenthetical statement serves as a crucial contextual interjection, emphasizing the overwhelming odds against the escapees. It clarifies that despite their efforts to flee secretly, the Chaldean army had completely encircled Jerusalem, making their escape attempt virtually impossible from the outset. This highlights the futility of their actions and the inescapable nature of their predicament.
  • "and they went by the way of the plain.": The final clause indicates the direction of their flight – towards the 'Arabah, or the Jordan plain. This was likely an attempt to reach the Jordan River and cross into Transjordan, hoping to find refuge or escape further into the desert. However, as subsequent verses reveal, this path led directly into the hands of their relentless pursuers, confirming the futility of their plan.

Literary Devices

Jeremiah 52:7 employs several powerful literary devices to convey the gravity and pathos of Jerusalem's fall. Irony is strikingly evident in the "men of war" fleeing rather than fighting, highlighting the utter collapse of Judah's military might and the futility of their resistance. The detailed description of the escape route—"the gate between the two walls, which was by the king's garden"—serves as vivid Imagery, painting a precise picture of the clandestine and desperate nature of the flight, grounding the narrative in specific, recognizable geographical features of ancient Jerusalem. The parenthetical remark, "(now the Chaldeans [were] by the city round about:)", functions as potent Foreshadowing and Dramatic Irony, immediately informing the reader of the inevitable failure of the escape attempt, even as the king and his men embark on it. This creates a profound sense of tragic inevitability, emphasizing that divine judgment, once fully unleashed, cannot be circumvented by human ingenuity or desperate measures.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah 52:7 stands as a stark testament to the principle that divine judgment, when fully enacted, is inescapable and comprehensive. It illustrates the tragic consequences of persistent disobedience and the absolute futility of human attempts to circumvent God's sovereign will. The fall of Jerusalem and the desperate flight of its king signify not merely a military defeat but the culmination of centuries of covenant unfaithfulness, demonstrating that God's patience, though vast, is not without limits. This devastating event served as a profound object lesson for Israel, reminding them of the serious implications of their covenant relationship with Yahweh and the absolute necessity of repentance and obedience to His commands.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Jeremiah 52:7 offers profound lessons for contemporary believers, serving as a solemn reminder of the gravity of unheeded warnings and the inevitability of consequences for persistent disobedience. Just as Judah's leaders and people ignored prophetic calls to repentance, we too can become complacent or rebellious, believing we can escape the natural or spiritual repercussions of our choices. This verse challenges us to cultivate a posture of humility and responsiveness to God's word, whether it comes through the direct declarations of Scripture, the wise counsel of spiritual mentors, or the gentle promptings of the Holy Spirit. It underscores the futility of attempting to outrun or outmaneuver the consequences of our actions, especially when they stem from a pattern of rebellion against divine truth and righteousness. Instead, it calls us to proactive and sincere repentance, seeking reconciliation with God and aligning our lives with His righteous standards before desperate measures become our only perceived option. The narrative also reminds us that even in moments of profound failure and devastating loss, God's overarching plan of redemption and restoration, though often painful in its unfolding, remains steadfast and ultimately triumphs.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life might I be ignoring God's warnings or subtly resisting His guidance?
  • How does the futile escape of Zedekiah's forces challenge my own tendencies to avoid responsibility or try to circumvent difficult consequences?
  • What does this passage teach me about the importance of immediate and sincere repentance when confronted with my sin?
  • How can I cultivate a greater sensitivity to God's voice and a quicker obedience to His commands in my daily life?

FAQ

What was "the gate between the two walls" and "the king's garden" referring to?

Answer: "The gate between the two walls" likely refers to a specific, perhaps concealed or less-used, exit point within Jerusalem's complex defensive system. Ancient cities often had multiple layers of walls, and a gate "between two walls" could indicate a hidden passage or a postern gate designed for emergency egress or for the king's private use. "The king's garden" was a known geographical feature located outside the main city walls, probably in the Kidron Valley or near the Gihon Spring. This specific mention suggests that King Zedekiah and his men attempted to escape through a route known only to a select few, hoping to avoid the main gates which would have been heavily guarded by the encircling Chaldean forces. This detail underscores the desperate and clandestine nature of their flight, highlighting the last-ditch effort to evade capture.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Jeremiah 52:7 vividly portrays the tragic end of a disobedient monarchy and the devastating judgment upon Jerusalem, it also, by profound contrast, points to the ultimate King and the true fulfillment of God's redemptive plan in Jesus Christ. Zedekiah's desperate flight through a hidden gate into the plain, only to be captured and suffer severe punishment, represents the futility of human attempts to escape divine judgment through self-effort or cunning. In stark contrast, Jesus, the true King of Israel and the Son of God, did not flee from judgment but willingly embraced it. He entered Jerusalem, not to escape, but to confront sin and death head-on, purposefully fulfilling the prophecies of a suffering servant (Isaiah 53:7). His "way" was not one of desperate escape, but of purposeful submission to the Father's will, leading Him to the cross, where He became the ultimate sacrifice for the sins of the world (John 1:29). Unlike Zedekiah, who was captured and blinded, Jesus willingly laid down His life and then rose again, conquering death and offering true escape – not from earthly enemies, but from the spiritual bondage of sin and its eternal consequences (Romans 6:23). His "garden" was Gethsemane, where He prayed in agony, submitting to the Father's will, rather than seeking an escape route (Matthew 26:36-46). Thus, Zedekiah's failed flight serves as a dark backdrop against which the glorious, redemptive mission of Christ shines even brighter, offering a path to salvation that is secure and eternal, unlike the fleeting and futile escape attempts of human kings.

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 52 verses 1–11

This narrative begins no higher than the beginning of the reign of Zedekiah, though there were two captivities before, one in the fourth year of Jehoiakim, the other in the first of Jeconiah; but probably it was drawn up by some of those that were carried away with Zedekiah, as a reproach to themselves for imagining that they should not go into captivity after their brethren, with which hopes they had long flattered themselves. We have here, 1. God's just displeasure against Judah and Jerusalem for their sin, Jer 52:3. His anger was against them to such a degree that he determined to cast them out from his presence, his favourable gracious presence, as a father, when he is extremely angry with an undutiful son, bids him get out of his presence, he expelled them from that good land that had such tokens of his presence in providential bounty and that holy city and temple that had such tokens of his presence in covenant-grace and love. Note, Those that are banished from God's ordinances have reason to complain that they are in some degree cast out of his presence; yet none are cast out from God's gracious presence but those that by sin have first thrown themselves out of it. This fruit of sin we should therefore deprecate above any thing, as David (Psa 51:11), Cast me not away from thy presence. 2. Zedekiah's bad conduct and management, to which God left him, in displeasure against the people, and for which God punished him, in displeasure against him. Zedekiah had arrived at years of discretion when he came to the throne; he was twenty-one years old (Jer 52:1); he was none of the worst of the kings (we never read of his idolatries), yet his character is that he did evil in the eyes of the Lord, for he did not do the good he should have done. But that evil deed of his which did in a special manner hasten this destruction was his rebelling against the king of Babylon, which was both his sin and his folly, and brought ruin upon his people, not only meritoriously, but efficiently. God was greatly displeased with him for his perfidious dealing with the king of Babylon (as we find, Eze 17:15, etc.); and, because he was angry at Judah and Jerusalem, he put him into the hand of his own counsels, to do that foolish thing which proved fatal to him and his kingdom. 3. The possession which the Chaldeans at length gained of Jerusalem, after eighteen months' siege. They sat down before it, and blocked it up, in the ninth year of Zedekiah's reign, in the tenth month (Jer 52:4), and made themselves masters of it in the eleventh year in the fourth month, Jer 52:6. In remembrance of these two steps towards their ruin, while they were in captivity, they kept a fast in the fourth month, and a fast in the tenth (Zac 8:19): that in the fifth month was in remembrance of the burning of the temple, and that in the seventh of the murder of Gedaliah. We may easily imagine, or rather cannot imagine, what a sad time it was with Jerusalem, during this year and half that it was besieged, when all provisions were cut off from coming to them and they were ever and anon alarmed by the attacks of the enemy, and, being obstinately resolved to hold out to the last extremity, nothing remained but a certain fearful looking for of judgment. That which disabled them to hold out, and yet could not prevail with them to capitulate, was the famine in the city (Jer 52:6); there was no bread for the people of the land, so that the soldiers could not make good their posts, but were rendered wholly unserviceable; and then no wonder that the city was broken up, Jer 52:7. Walls, in such a case, will not hold out long without men, any more than men without walls; nor will both together stand people in any stead without God and his protection. 4. The inglorious retreat of the king and his mighty men. They got out of the city by night (Jer 52:7) and made the best of their way, I know not whither, nor perhaps they themselves; but the king was overtaken by the pursuers in the plains of Jericho, his guards were dispersed, and all his army was scattered from him, Jer 52:8. His fright was not causeless, for there is no escaping the judgments of God; they will come upon the sinner, and will overtake him, let him flee where he will (Deu 28:15), and these judgments particularly that are here executed were there threatened, Jer 51:52, Jer 51:53, etc. 5. The sad doom passed upon Zedekiah by the king of Babylon, and immediately put in execution. he treated him as a rebel, gave judgment upon him, Jer 51:9. One cannot think of it without the utmost vexation and regret that a king, a king of Judah, a king of the house of David, should be arraigned as a criminal at the bar of this heathen king. But he humbled not himself before Jeremiah the prophet; therefore God thus humbled him. Pursuant to the sentence passed upon him by the haughty conqueror, his sons were slain before his eyes, and all the princes of Judah (Jer 52:10); then his eyes were put out, and he was bound in chains, carried in triumph to Babylon; perhaps they made sport with him, as they did with Samson when his eyes were put out; however, he was condemned to perpetual imprisonment, wearing out the remainder of his life (I cannot say his days, for he saw day no more) in darkness and misery. He was kept in prison till the day of his death, but had some honour done him at his funeral, Jer 34:5. Jeremiah had often told him what it would come to, but he would not take warning when he might have prevented it.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–11. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 52:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.