Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Because Syria, Ephraim, and the son of Remaliah, have taken evil counsel against thee, saying,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Because Syria H758, Ephraim H669, and the son H1121 of Remaliah H7425, have taken evil H7451 counsel H3289 against thee, saying H559,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
or because Aram, Efrayim and the son of Remalyah have been plotting against you, thinking,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
For Aram, along with Ephraim and the son of Remaliah, has plotted your ruin, saying:
Ask
American Standard Version
Because Syria, Ephraim, and the son of Remaliah, have purposed evil against thee, saying,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Because Syria, Ephraim, and the son of Remaliah, have plotted evil against you, saying,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Because Aram hath taken wicked counsell against thee, and Ephraim, and Remaliahs sonne, saying,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Because that Aram counselled against thee evil, Ephraim and the son of Remaliah, saying:
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 17,788 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Isaiah 7:5 stands as a critical declaration within the unfolding drama of the Syro-Ephraimite War, explicitly revealing the malicious intent and calculated strategy of the northern alliance against the Southern Kingdom of Judah. It names Syria (Aram), Ephraim (the Northern Kingdom of Israel), and King Pekah (referred to as "the son of Remaliah") as the conspirators who have formulated a destructive plan against King Ahaz and Jerusalem. This verse serves as the divine exposition of the enemy's secret counsel, setting the urgent stage for God's subsequent prophetic response through Isaiah, thereby highlighting the gravity of the human threat while simultaneously affirming God's omniscient awareness of even the most hidden schemes.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Isaiah 7:5 is strategically placed at the heart of a pivotal prophetic encounter between the prophet Isaiah and King Ahaz of Judah. The preceding verses, particularly Isaiah 7:1-2, vividly portray the profound fear that gripped Jerusalem upon receiving news of the advancing allied forces of Syria and Ephraim. In response to this widespread panic, God, through Isaiah, immediately intervenes, instructing Ahaz to remain steadfast and not to fear, but rather to trust in the Lord (Isaiah 7:3-4). Verse 5 then explicitly articulates the "evil counsel" of these enemies, providing the specific details of their hostile intentions. This declaration of the enemy's plot is immediately followed by God's powerful and direct rebuttal in Isaiah 7:6-7, where He emphatically states that their scheme "shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass." Thus, Isaiah 7:5 functions as the precise articulation of the human threat, against which God's sovereign and immutable word is then powerfully contrasted, underscoring the divine response to human conspiracy.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: This verse is deeply embedded in the historical context of the Syro-Ephraimite War, which raged around 734-732 BC. During this tumultuous period, the formidable Assyrian Empire was rapidly expanding its dominance, casting a long shadow over the smaller kingdoms of the Levant. In response to this existential threat, King Rezin of Syria (Aram) and King Pekah of Ephraim (the Northern Kingdom of Israel) forged an anti-Assyrian coalition. Their objective was to compel Judah to join their alliance. When King Ahaz of Judah steadfastly refused to participate, they launched a military invasion with the explicit aim of deposing him and installing a more compliant puppet king, specifically "the son of Tabeal" (Isaiah 7:6). This was not merely a geopolitical maneuver but a direct assault on the divinely established Davidic dynasty and Judah's sovereignty, threatening the very promises God had made to King David regarding an enduring kingdom. The broader cultural context includes the common practice of forming regional alliances, often under duress, and the constant geopolitical maneuvering and military coercion employed by larger imperial powers or defensive coalitions.
  • Key Themes: Isaiah 7:5 makes a profound contribution to several overarching themes found throughout the book of Isaiah and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it starkly highlights the theme of human conspiracy and rebellion against God's purposes. The "evil counsel" described is not merely a tactical military strategy but a plan that fundamentally opposes God's covenant with David, which guaranteed an enduring royal line and kingdom (2 Samuel 7:12-16). Secondly, the verse underscores the vulnerability of God's people when their trust is misplaced in human strength, alliances, or political maneuvering rather than in divine protection, thereby setting the stage for Ahaz's tragic failure to trust God's explicit assurance. Thirdly, and perhaps most significantly, Isaiah 7:5 powerfully emphasizes God's absolute sovereignty and omniscience over all human affairs. Even before the enemy's plot could be executed, God reveals its precise details to Isaiah, demonstrating unequivocally that no human scheme, however formidable or clandestine, can ever thwart His ultimate will. This divine awareness and foreknowledge then pave the way for the profound prophecies of Immanuel and the ultimate triumph of God's redemptive plan, as powerfully articulated in Isaiah 7:14.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • son (Hebrew, bên', H1121): Derived from a root meaning "to build," this term broadly refers to a son in the widest sense, encompassing both literal and figurative relationships, including descendants, subjects, or even qualities. In this context, "the son of Remaliah" specifically identifies Pekah, the king of Israel, by his patronymic rather than his royal title. This usage might subtly convey a dismissive or derogatory tone, highlighting his non-Davidic and perhaps illegitimate claim to kingship in contrast to Ahaz's divinely ordained Davidic lineage, thereby undermining his authority in the eyes of the Judahite audience.
  • evil (Hebrew, raʻ', H7451): This word denotes something inherently bad, morally corrupt, or causing significant distress and harm. When applied to "counsel" here, it describes the malevolent, destructive, and ethically reprehensible nature of the plan concocted by the allied kings. It implies a strategy designed not merely for military gain but for severe detriment, intended to displease God, disrupt His covenant purposes for Judah, and inflict profound suffering upon His people. The "evil" is thus both moral and practical in its destructive intent.
  • counsel (Hebrew, yâʻats', H3289): From a primitive root meaning "to advise," this term, when used reflexively, signifies to deliberate or resolve. In Isaiah 7:5, it refers to a deliberate, premeditated, and carefully formulated plan or strategy devised by the allied kings. It speaks to the intentionality, calculation, and concerted effort behind their hostile plot to overthrow King Ahaz and impose a puppet ruler. This "counsel" is therefore a well-thought-out scheme, not a spontaneous act, underscoring the gravity of their unified aggression.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Because Syria, Ephraim, and the son of Remaliah,": This initial clause precisely identifies the three principal antagonists forming the formidable alliance against Judah. "Syria" refers to the kingdom of Aram-Damascus, under the leadership of King Rezin. "Ephraim" serves as a metonymy for the Northern Kingdom of Israel, whose capital was Samaria, and whose reigning monarch was Pekah. The phrase "the son of Remaliah" specifically and somewhat contemptuously names King Pekah, emphasizing his personal responsibility for the conspiracy and perhaps subtly diminishing his royal status by referring to him by his father's name rather than his kingly title, contrasting him with the legitimate Davidic king, Ahaz. This tripartite identification clearly delineates the formidable nature of the hostile coalition.
  • "have taken evil counsel against thee,": This is the central declaration and revelation of the verse, exposing the core of the enemy's intentions. It states that these three entities have collectively and deliberately formed an "evil counsel," signifying a malicious and destructive plan. The term "evil" (Hebrew raʻ) underscores the malevolent intent behind their strategy, which was not merely a geopolitical maneuver but an act of hostility aimed at severely harming Judah and its divinely appointed Davidic king. The direct address "against thee" targets King Ahaz personally, and by extension, the entire kingdom of Judah, emphasizing the direct and personal nature of the threat.
  • "saying,": This concluding word functions as a crucial transitional element, signaling that the subsequent verses (specifically Isaiah 7:6) will immediately proceed to reveal the precise content and detailed objectives of this "evil counsel." It effectively builds anticipation for the full exposition of the enemies' destructive intentions, moving from the fact of their conspiracy to its specific aims.

Literary Devices

Isaiah 7:5 masterfully employs several literary devices to heighten the dramatic tension and convey its profound message. The explicit naming of the adversarial nations—Syria and Ephraim—alongside the specific, almost dismissive, patronymic "the son of Remaliah," effectively personifies these political entities, presenting them as unified, malevolent agents driven by a singular, hostile will. This creates a clear and immediate sense of an external, formidable threat. The phrase "evil counsel" functions as a pivotal statement, precisely defining the nature of the enemy's intentions and setting the dramatic stage for God's counter-declaration of His absolute sovereignty in the subsequent verses. It also serves as potent foreshadowing, hinting at the deeper theological conflict at play: not merely a geopolitical struggle for power, but a profound clash between human rebellious schemes and God's unshakeable, eternal divine plan. Furthermore, the very revelation of this "evil counsel" by God through His prophet Isaiah demonstrates a profound irony: the enemies believe their plot is secret and executable, yet it is fully known to the omniscient Lord, who will ultimately and decisively frustrate it, turning their wisdom into foolishness.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Isaiah 7:5, by exposing the "evil counsel" of Judah's formidable enemies, profoundly illustrates the timeless biblical truth of God's absolute sovereignty over all human affairs, even the most clandestine and malevolent plots. It serves as a powerful reminder that while nations may rage, conspire, and devise schemes against His people or His purposes, their plans are ultimately subject to the divine will and can never ultimately thwart God's ultimate design. This verse highlights the inherent tension between human autonomy and divine control, setting the stage for God's magnificent demonstration of His power to nullify the schemes of the wicked and protect His covenant promises. It particularly underscores the enduring nature of God's covenant with the Davidic line, which this "evil counsel" brazenly sought to dismantle. The Lord's immediate and decisive response to this grave threat, providing a sign and unwavering assurance, powerfully demonstrates His active involvement in the history of His people, faithfully protecting His purposes despite formidable human opposition.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Isaiah 7:5, while rooted in an ancient geopolitical crisis, offers profound and timeless lessons that resonate deeply with believers today. It serves as a poignant reminder that throughout salvation history, God's people have consistently faced adversaries who conspire with "evil counsel" against them, whether these manifestations are overt persecutions, subtle deceptions, systemic injustices, or personal attacks. In such moments of perceived threat, the natural human response is often overwhelming fear, crippling anxiety, or a frantic, often misguided, search for purely human solutions and alliances. However, this passage powerfully calls us to a much deeper, unwavering trust in God's omniscience and omnipotence. Just as God was intimately aware of the precise details of Syria and Ephraim's destructive plot against Judah, He is likewise intimately aware of every challenge, every scheme, and every opposition we face in our lives. Our ultimate comfort and enduring strength do not originate from the absence of threats, but rather from the unwavering presence and sovereign control of a God who unequivocally declares, "It shall not stand." Therefore, when confronted with seemingly overwhelming odds or malicious intent, we are profoundly invited to rest in the steadfast assurance that God's purposes for us, and for the advancement of His eternal kingdom, will ultimately prevail, regardless of the "counsel" or machinations of men.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "evil counsel" or opposing forces do I perceive to be arrayed against me, my family, or God's purposes in my life or community today?
  • How does knowing that God is fully aware of these plans, even before they fully unfold, profoundly impact my sense of fear, anxiety, or helplessness?
  • In what specific ways might I be tempted to rely on human strategies, worldly alliances, or my own limited strength rather than fully trusting in God's sovereign protection and ultimate victory, similar to King Ahaz's initial inclination?

FAQ

Who are "Syria, Ephraim, and the son of Remaliah" in this verse?

Answer: "Syria" refers to the powerful Aramean kingdom of Damascus, which was led by King Rezin at this time. "Ephraim" is a poetic or prophetic designation for the Northern Kingdom of Israel, whose capital was Samaria. "The son of Remaliah" is a specific, and somewhat dismissive, reference to King Pekah, who was the reigning monarch of Israel. These three entities formed a formidable anti-Assyrian alliance during the Syro-Ephraimite War (c. 734-732 BC) with the explicit aim of attacking and subjugating the Southern Kingdom of Judah.

What was the "evil counsel" they took against Judah?

Answer: As further revealed in Isaiah 7:6, their "evil counsel" was a detailed and aggressive plan to invade Judah, besiege the capital city of Jerusalem, and depose King Ahaz. Their ultimate and audacious goal was to install a puppet ruler, specifically "the son of Tabeal," who would then compel Judah to join their anti-Assyrian coalition. This was a direct and severe threat to the divinely established Davidic dynasty and Judah's national independence.

Why is this verse important in the broader context of Isaiah 7?

Answer: Isaiah 7:5 is profoundly crucial because it explicitly articulates the formidable human threat that King Ahaz and the kingdom of Judah faced, thereby setting the urgent stage for God's powerful, comforting, and sovereign response. By revealing the enemy's specific "evil counsel" and their precise intentions, the verse highlights the gravity and immediacy of the situation, making God's subsequent declaration—that their plan "shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass" (Isaiah 7:7)—all the more profound and impactful. It powerfully underscores God's omniscience and absolute sovereignty, demonstrating that He is fully aware of all human schemes and possesses the ultimate power to thwart them, leading directly into the famous and foundational prophecy of Immanuel (Isaiah 7:14).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Isaiah 7:5, with its stark depiction of an "evil counsel" arrayed against God's chosen king and kingdom, finds its ultimate fulfillment and profound echoes in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. Just as Syria and Ephraim conspired with malevolent intent against King Ahaz, the Davidic king of Judah, so too did the powers of this world—both human and spiritual—conspire against the true and ultimate Davidic King, Jesus. The Gospels vividly record the "evil counsel" of the religious leaders, who meticulously plotted to seize and kill Jesus (Matthew 26:3-4), alongside the intricate political machinations of figures like Pilate and Herod (Luke 23:6-12). Yet, just as God declared that the counsel against Ahaz would not stand, so too did the Father sovereignly oversee the crucifixion of Jesus, miraculously turning what appeared to be the ultimate triumph of "evil counsel" into the very means of humanity's salvation. The conspiracy against Christ, though seemingly successful in His death on the cross, was ultimately and decisively frustrated by His glorious resurrection, proving beyond doubt that no human or demonic plan can ever thwart God's eternal redemptive purpose (Acts 2:23-24). Jesus, the promised Immanuel, "God with us" (Matthew 1:23), is the one against whom the nations rage and the peoples plot in utter futility (Psalm 2:1-2). His eternal kingdom, unlike Ahaz's temporal one, is unshakeable and everlasting, ultimately established through His decisive triumph over all "evil counsel" and every opposing power, culminating in the declaration that "The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Messiah, and he will reign for ever and ever" (Revelation 11:15).

Copy as

Commentary on Isaiah 7 verses 1–9

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

The prophet Isaiah had his commission renewed in the year that king Uzziah died, Isa 6:1. Jotham his son reigned, and reigned well, sixteen years. All that time, no doubt, Isaiah prophesied as he was commanded, and yet we have not in this book any of his prophecies dated in the reign of Jotham; but this, which is put first, was in the days of Ahaz the son of Jotham. Many excellent useful sermons he preached which were not published and left upon record; for, if all that was memorable had been written, the world could not have contained the books, Joh 21:25. Perhaps in the reign of Ahaz, a wicked king, he had not opportunity to preach so much at court as in Jotham's time, and therefore then he wrote the more, for a testimony against them. Here is,

I. A very formidable design laid against Jerusalem by Rezin king of Syria and Pekah king of Israel, two neighbouring potentates, who had of late made descents upon Judah severally. At the end of the reign of Jotham, the Lord began to send against Judah Rezin and Pekah, Kg2 15:37. But now, in the second or third year of the reign of Ahaz, encouraged by their former successes, they entered into an alliance against Judah. Because Ahaz, though he found the sword over his head, began his reign with idolatry, God delivered him into the hand of the king of Syria and of the king of Israel (Ch2 28:5), and a great slaughter they made in his kingdom, Isa 7:6, Isa 7:7. Flushed with this victory, they went up towards Jerusalem, the royal city, to war against it, to besiege it, and make themselves masters of it; but it proved in the issue that they could not gain their point. Note, The sin of a land brings foreign invasions upon it and betrays the most advantageous posts and passes to the enemy; and God sometimes makes one wicked nation a scourge to another; but judgment, ordinarily, begins at the house of God.

II. The great distress that Ahaz and his court were in when they received advice of this design: It was told the house of David that Syria and Ephraim had signed a league against Judah, Isa 7:2. This degenerate royal family is called the house of David, to put us in mind of that article of God's covenant with David (Psa 89:30-33), If his children forsake my law, I will chasten their transgression with the rod; but my loving-kindness will I not utterly take away, which is remarkably fulfilled in this chapter. News being brought that the two armies of Syria and Israel were joined, and had taken the field, the court, the city, and the country, were thrown into consternation; The heart of Ahaz was moved with fear, and then no wonder that the heart of his people was so, as the trees of the wood are moved with the wind. They were tossed and shaken, and put into a great disorder and confusion, were wavering and uncertain in their counsels, hurried hither and thither, and could not fix in any steady resolution. They yielded to the storm, and gave up all for gone, concluding it in vain to make any resistance. Now that which caused this fright was the sense of guilt and the weakness of their faith. They had made God their enemy, and knew not how to make him their friend, and therefore their fears tyrannised over them; while those whose consciences are kept void of offence, and whose hearts are fixed, trusting in God, need not be afraid of evil tidings; though the earth be removed, yet will not they fear; but the wicked flee at the shaking of a leaf, Lev 26:36.

III. The orders and directions given to Isaiah to go and encourage Ahaz in his distress; not for his own sake (he deserved to hear nothing from God but words of terror, which might add affliction to his grief), but because he was a son of David and king of Judah. God had kindness for him for his father's sake, who must not be forgotten, and for his people's sake, who must not be abandoned, but would be encouraged if Ahaz were. Observe,

1.God appointed the prophet to meet Ahaz, though he did not send to the prophet to speak with him, nor desire him to enquire of the Lord for him (Isa 7:3): Go to meet Ahaz. Note, God is often found of those who seek him not, much more will he be found of those who seek him diligently. He speaks comfort to many who not only are not worthy of it, but do not so much as enquire after it.

3.He ordered him to take his little son with him, because he carried a sermon in his name, Shear-jashub - A remnant shall return. The prophets sometimes recorded what they preached in the significant names of their children (as Hos 1:4, Hos 1:6, Hos 1:9); therefore Isaiah's children are said to be for signs, Isa 8:18. This son was so called for the encouragement of those of God's people who were carried captive, assuring them that they should return, at least a remnant of them, which was more than they could pretend to merit; yet at this time God was better than his word; for he took care not only that a remnant should return, but the whole number of those whom the confederate forces of Syria and Israel had taken prisoners, Ch2 28:15.

3.He directed him where he should find Ahaz. He was to meet with him not in the temple, or the synagogue, or royal chapel, but at the end of the conduit of the upper pool, where he was, probably with many of his servants about him, contriving how to order the water-works, so as to secure them to the city, or deprive the enemy of the benefits of them (Isa 22:9-11; Ch2 32:3, Ch2 32:4), or giving some necessary directions for the fortifying of the city as well as they could; and perhaps finding every thing in a bad posture or defence, the conduit out of repair, as well as other things gone to decay, his fears increased, and he was now in greater perplexity than ever; therefore, Go, meet him there. Note, God sometimes sends comforts to his people very seasonably, and, what time they are most afraid, encourages them to trust in him.

4.He put words in his mouth, else the prophet would not have known how to bring a message of good to such a bad man, a sinner in Zion, that ought to be afraid; but God intended it for the support of faithful Israelites.

(1.)The prophet must rebuke their fears, and advise them by no means to yield to them, but keep their temper, and preserve the possession of their own souls (Isa 7:4): Take heed, and be quiet. Note, In order to comfort there is need of caution; that we may be quiet, it is necessary that we take heed and watch against those things that threaten to disquiet us. "Fear not with this amazement, this fear, that weakens, and has torment; neither let thy heart be tender, so as to melt and fail within thee; but pluck up thy spirits, have a good heart on it, and be courageous; let not fear betray the succours which reason and religion offer for thy support." Note, Those who expect God should help them must help themselves, Psa 27:14.

(2.)He must teach them to despise their enemies, not in pride, or security, or incogitancy (nothing more dangerous than so to despise an enemy), but in faith and dependence upon God. Ahaz's fear called them two powerful politic princes, for either of whom he was an unequal match, but, if united, he durst not look them in the face, nor make head against them. "No," says the prophet, "they are two tails of smoking firebrands; they are angry, they are fierce, they are furious, as firebrands, as fireballs; and they make one another worse by being in a confederacy, as sticks of fire put together burn the more violently. But they are only smoking firebrands: and where there is smoke there is some fire, but it may be not so much as was feared. Their threatenings will vanish into smoke. Pharaoh king of Egypt is but a noise (Jer 46:17), and Rezin king of Syria but a smoke; and such are all the enemies of God's church, smoking flax, that will soon be quenched. Nay, they are but tails of smoking firebrands, in a manner burnt out already; their force is spent; they have consumed themselves with the heat of their own anger; you may put your foot on them, and tread them out." The two kingdoms of Syria and Israel were now near expiring. Note, The more we have an eye to God as a consuming fire the less reason we shall have to fear men, though they are ever so furious, nay, we shall be able to despise them as smoking firebrands.

(3.)He must assure them that the present design of these high allies (so they thought themselves) against Jerusalem should certainly be defeated and come to nothing, Isa 7:5-7. [1.] That very thing which Ahaz thought most formidable is made the ground of their defeat - and that was the depth of their designs and the height of their hopes: "Therefore they shall be baffled and sent back with shame, because they have taken evil counsel against thee, which is an offence to God. These firebrands are a smoke in his nose (Isa 65:5), and therefore must be extinguished." First, They are very spiteful and malicious, and, therefore they shall not prosper. Judah had done them no wrong; they had no pretence to quarrel with Ahaz; but, without any reason, they said, Let us go up against Judah, and vex it. Note, Those that are vexatious cannot expect to be prosperous, those that love to do mischief cannot expect to do well. Secondly, They are very secure, and confident of success. They will vex Judah by going up against it; yet that is not all: they do not doubt but to make a breach in the wall of Jerusalem wide enough for them to march their army in at; or they count upon dissecting or dividing the kingdom into two parts, one for the king of Israel, the other for the king of Syria, who had agreed in one viceroy - a king to be set in the midst of it, even the son of Tabeal, some obscure person, it is uncertain whether a Syrian or an Israelite. So sure were they of gaining their point that they divided the prey before they had caught it. Note, Those that are most scornful are commonly least successful, for surely God scorns the scorners. [2.] God himself gives them his word that the attempt should not take effect (Isa 7:7): "Thus saith the Lord God, the sovereign Lord of all, who brings the counsel of the heathen to naught (Psa 33:10), It shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass; their measures shall all be broken, and they shall not be able to bring to pass their enterprise." Note, Whatever stands against God, or thinks to stand without him, cannot stand long. Man purposes, but God disposes; and who is he that saith and it cometh to pass if the Lord commands it not or countermands it? Lam 3:37. See Pro 19:21.

(4.)He must give them a prospect of the destruction of these enemies, at last, that were now such a terror to them. [1.] They should neither of them enlarge their dominions, nor push their conquests any further; The head city of Syria is Damascus, and the head man of Damascus is Rezin; this he glories in, and this let him be content with, Isa 7:8. The head city of Ephraim has long been Samaria, and the head man in Samaria is now Pekah the son of Remaliah. These shall be made to know their own, their bounds are fixed, and they shall not pass them, to make themselves masters of the cities of Judah, much less to make Jerusalem their prey. Note, As God has appointed men the bounds of their habitation (Act 17:26), so he has appointed princes the bounds of their dominion, within which they ought to confine themselves, and not encroach upon their neighbours' rights. [2.] Ephraim, which perhaps was the more malicious and forward enemy of the two, should shortly be quite rooted out, and should be so far from seizing other people's lands that they should not be able to hold their own. Interpreters are much at a loss how to compute the sixty-five years within which Ephraim shall cease to be a people; for the captivity of the ten tribes was but eleven years after this: and some make it a mistake of the transcriber, and think it should be read within six and five years, just eleven. But it is hard to allow that. Others make it to be sixty-five years from the time that the prophet Amos first foretold the ruin of the kingdom of the ten tribes; and some late interpreters make it to look as far forward as the last desolation of that country by Esarhaddon, which was about sixty-five years after this; then Ephraim was so broken that it was no more a people. Now it was the greatest folly in the world for those to be ruining their neighbours who were themselves marked for ruin, and so near to it. See what a prophet told them at this time, when they were triumphing over Judah, Ch2 28:10. Are there not with you, even with you, sins against the Lord your God?

(5.)He must urge them to mix faith with those assurances which he had given them (Isa 7:9): "If you will not believe what is said to you, surely you shall not be established; your shaken and disordered state shall not be established, your unquiet unsettled spirit shall not; though the things told you are very encouraging, yet they will not be so to you, unless you believe them, and be willing to take God's word." Note, The grace of faith is absolutely necessary to the quieting and composing of the mind in the midst of all the tosses of this present time, Ch2 20:20.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–9. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Isaiah
(Verse 3, 4 and following) And the Lord said to Isaiah: Go out to meet Ahaz, you and your son Shear-Jashub, at the end of the conduit of the upper pool on the highway to the Fuller's Field. And say to him: Take heed, be quiet, do not fear, and do not let your heart be faint because of these two smoldering stumps of firebrands, at the fierce anger of Rezin and Syria, and the son of Remaliah. Because Syria, Ephraim, and the son of Remaliah have plotted evil against you, saying: Let us go up against Judah and trouble it, and let us make a gap in its wall for ourselves, and set a king over it, the son of Tabeel. Thus says the Lord God, this will not stand, and this will not be, but the head of Syria is Damascus and the head of Damascus is Rezin, and yet sixty-five years, and Ephraim will cease to be a people. And the head of Ephraim is Samaria, and the head of Samaria is the son of Romelia. If you do not believe, you will not endure. Jasub, the son of Isaiah, who is interpreted as the remnant and turning back, in the likeness of the people of Judah, who was to be saved from the hands of the two kings, is commanded to go out with his parent and meet Ahaz, the king of Judah, by the upper pool of the aqueduct, on the road of the fuller's field, where later we will read, in the time of King Hezekiah, Rabshakeh stood to blaspheme the people of God by order of Sennacherib, the king of Assyria. The place they went out to was the one where the leaders of the city, sent by Hezekiah, were mentioned in the book of Kings. And it is commanded to Ahaz (2 Kings 18), even though he is a wicked king, by the mercy of the Lord, to be silent and not be terrified or afraid in his heart, thinking that he will suffer similar things that he had suffered before. However, he calls the two tails of burning wood, that is, the smoke towers, Rezin the king of Syria and Pekah the son of Remaliah king of Samaria, because the kingdom of Syria, that is, Damascus, and the kingdom of Samaria, that is, the ten tribes, which were called Ephraim by another name, end in them. For it is written (2 Kings 16) that Theglathphalassar, king of the Assyrians, ascended to Damascus under King Ahaz and laid it waste, and carried away its inhabitants to Cyrene, and killed Rasin, and that he plotted against Pekah son of Remaliah, and killed him, and reigned in Israel for nine years in his place, and that Salmanasar, king of Assyria, came and besieged Samaria, which is now called Sebaste, for three years, and in the ninth year of the reign of Hoshea he captured it, and he imprisoned Hoshea and carried Israel away to the Assyrians, and placed them in Halah and in Habor by the River Gozan and in the cities of Media, or as the Septuagint translated, in the mountains of Media (2 Kings 17). For although the wicked kings have devised a plan today to ascend to Judah, whose region is situated in the mountains, and to rouse him from his rest, and in a way, to subdue him to their authority; and to set over him the son of Tabeel, who is interpreted as 'good God', in order to show either a man with this name, or an idol. Nevertheless, thus says the Lord God: This plan shall not stand, but for the time being the head of Syria's cities shall be Damascus, and in that very metropolis, Rasin shall reign. Furthermore, in Ephraim because of Jeroboam the son of Nabath, who was the first ruler of Ephraim, there will be the head of Samaria, that is, the royal house in the city of Samaria, and the head of Samaria will be the son of Romelia, that is, Phacee: however, the kingdom of the ten tribes, that is, the people of Ephraim, will cease to exist after sixty-five years. If we do not pay closer attention, it will not be able to stand. For in the twelfth year of Achaz the son of Joatham in the tribe of Judah, Hoshia ruled over Samaria, and in the ninth year, he was captured by the Assyrian empire (2 Kings 17). However, Achaz reigned over Judah for sixteen years (2 Kings 16), after whose death in the seventh year of his reign, Hoshea was captured and Samaria was destroyed, and the entire people were transported to Media. Thus, if we were to add sixteen years for Achaz and seven for Hoshea, there would be a total of twenty-three years, or at most, twenty-four. So where are the sixty-five years in which the kingdom of Israel is said to be ended? Therefore, the Hebrews explained this passage as follows: Amos, who began prophesying during the reign of Uzziah, also known as Azariah, and Isaiah, who began his prophecy, was the first to prophesy against Israel, saying: But Israel shall be taken captive out of his own land (Amos 7:11, 17). The title of his prophecy against Samaria is: And he began to prophesy in the days of Uzziah, king of Judah, two years before the earthquake, which is said to have occurred at the time when Uzziah entered the temple of God and usurped the priesthood for himself, and the earth shook, and the ashes of the altar were poured out, and the king himself was struck with leprosy (II Chronicles 26). But Ozias wanted there to be twenty-five years when these things happened, of which there remain twenty-seven more years. For Ozias reigned for fifty-two years (2 Kings 15), after him his son Joatham reigned for sixteen years, and his son Achaz for another sixteen years. After him reigned Ezechias, and in the sixth year of his reign, Samaria was captured, making a total of sixty-five years (2 Kings 16). This, the Lord predicting through the prophet, Achaz and the people did not believe the future. Hence it is added: If you do not believe, you will not remain, as Symmachus translated, that is, you will not remain in your kingdom, but you will be led into captivity, enduring the punishment of those whose faithlessness you imitated. Or certainly according to the Septuagint, you will not understand. And the meaning is: because you do not believe what the Lord says will happen, you will not have understanding. These things we have spoken according to history. However, according to the intended symbolism, it should be considered that the prophet Isaiah is commanded to meet the impious king, going out from his place, not at the beginning of the aqueduct, but at the farthest ends of the upper pool, which was in the field of the clothiers, where impurities and stains were cleansed. Although Ahaz reigned over Judah, because he was impious, he dwelled at the farthest ends of the upper pool. Therefore, God does not have such pity on a king whom he regarded as unworthy of salvation as he has for his own people. However, the two tails of smoking torches, as we have previously mentioned, are called secular wisdom and heretical discourse, the end of which is destruction. Those who foolishly devised a plan to rise up against Judah, in order to capture him as if he were careless and asleep, and to associate him with their own errors, and to place the son of Tabeel, that is, a false god, on him. For both adversaries consider the truth to be with themselves, and they estimate that their own doctrine is the best. In the end, the heretic Marcion believes that Christ is the son of the good God, that is, of another, and not of the just one whose prophets he is. He calls him bloody, cruel, and a judge. While they are saying these things, the Lord threatens that their plan will not stand, but for the time being, as long as this world stands, and as long as the things of this world rule in their boundaries and cities. But when the time of the consummation comes, that is, sixty-five years, and both the things of the world that were made in six days, and all that pertains to the five senses, come to an end, then everything will be dissolved, which the gentiles and heretics do not believe will happen, and because of their disbelief, they do not understand what is being said.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Isaiah 7:5 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.