Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ And he discovered the covering of Judah, and thou didst look in that day to the armour of the house of the forest.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And he discovered H1540 the covering H4539 of Judah H3063, and thou didst look H5027 in that day H3117 to the armour H5402 of the house H1004 of the forest H3293.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
thus is Y'hudah's protection removed. That day you looked for the armor in the House of the Forest.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
He has uncovered the defenses of Judah. On that day you looked to the weapons in the House of the Forest.
Ask
American Standard Version
And he took away the covering of Judah; and thou didst look in that day to the armor in the house of the forest.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He took away the covering of Judah; and you looked in that day to the armor in the house of the forest.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And hee discouered the couering of Iudah: and thou didest looke in that day to the armour of the house of the forest.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And one removeth the covering of Judah, And thou lookest in that day Unto the armour of the house of the forest,
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Isaiah 22:8 powerfully encapsulates Judah's spiritual crisis during a moment of profound national vulnerability, likely the Assyrian siege of Jerusalem. The prophet reveals that God, in an act of sovereign judgment, has "discovered" or removed the protective "covering" from Judah, exposing their inherent weakness. Instead of humbly seeking the Lord for deliverance in this dire situation, the people of Judah frantically turn their attention and hope toward their military defenses, specifically "the armour of the house of the forest," symbolizing their misplaced trust in human strength, strategic preparations, and material resources rather than in divine intervention and protection. This verse serves as a stark prophetic indictment, underscoring the critical theological principle that true security and deliverance are found exclusively in God's sovereign power, not in human might or earthly provisions.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Isaiah 22:8 is an integral part of a larger prophetic oracle (Isaiah 22:1-14) specifically directed at Jerusalem, referred to as "the valley of vision." This section immediately follows divine pronouncements against other nations, positioning Jerusalem's impending judgment within a broader framework of God's sovereign reckoning. The preceding verses (Isaiah 22:1-7) vividly describe the initial chaos, lament, and panic that will grip the city, contrasting sharply with the superficial revelry and lack of repentance condemned later in the chapter. Importantly, verses 9-11 directly elaborate on Judah's frantic human preparations—including repairing the city walls, collecting water, and fortifying defenses—all undertaken without "looking to the Maker" or "having respect unto him that fashioned it long ago" (Isaiah 22:11). This direct indictment in verse 11 reinforces and expands upon the misplaced trust highlighted in verse 8. The oracle culminates in a severe and irreversible divine judgment due to their unrepentant pursuit of earthly pleasures and self-reliance (Isaiah 22:14).

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The most widely accepted historical backdrop for Isaiah 22 is the Assyrian siege of Jerusalem in 701 BC, during the reign of King Hezekiah. This period was characterized by immense geopolitical pressure as the formidable Assyrian Empire, under Sennacherib, systematically conquered cities throughout Judah. While Jerusalem miraculously survived this particular siege, it faced an existential threat, prompting desperate measures. Culturally, the "house of the forest" (Hebrew: Bêth Yaʻar) was a prominent and well-known royal building in Jerusalem, constructed by King Solomon (1 Kings 7:2). It was named for its numerous cedar pillars, which resembled a dense forest, and served as a royal armory and treasury. Thus, it was a potent symbol of Judah's military might, accumulated wealth, and human strategic capabilities. The act of "looking to the armour" was a natural human response for a nation under siege, turning to its most formidable defenses; however, prophetically, it was condemned for being a misplaced reliance instead of trusting in God alone.

  • Key Themes: Isaiah 22:8 powerfully contributes to several key themes pervasive throughout the book of Isaiah and broader prophetic literature. Firstly, it highlights the theme of Divine Judgment and Exposure. God's act of "discovering the covering" signifies His sovereign removal of Judah's perceived security, allowing their inherent vulnerability and spiritual nakedness to be revealed. This is a recurring motif where God exposes the futility of human efforts when they presumptuously replace divine reliance (e.g., Hosea 2:10). Secondly, the verse underscores the profound theme of Misplaced Trust. Judah's turning to the "armour of the house of the forest" rather than to the Lord exemplifies a critical spiritual failure—a reliance on human strength, military prowess, and material resources over divine provision and protection. This stands in stark contrast to the consistent biblical call to trust in the Lord alone, as seen in passages like Psalm 20:7 or Psalm 33:16-17. Finally, it touches on the theme of Spiritual Blindness and Unrepentance, as the people's frantic preparations are undertaken without genuine repentance or seeking the Lord, leading to the prophet's lament over their spiritual apathy in the face of impending doom (Isaiah 22:12-13).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • discovered (Hebrew, gâlâh', H1540): A primitive root meaning "to denude (especially in a disgraceful sense); by implication, to exile (captives being usually stripped); figuratively, to reveal." In this context, it signifies God's sovereign act of uncovering or removing Judah's protective veil, exposing their weakness and vulnerability. It implies a divine passive, where God allows or orchestrates the revelation of their true, unprotected state, often as a consequence of their spiritual rebellion.
  • armour (Hebrew, nesheq', H5402): Meaning "military equipment, i.e. (collectively) arms (offensive or defensive), or (concretely) an arsenal." This word specifically refers to the weapons, defensive gear, and military implements stored in the armory. It highlights the tangible objects of Judah's misplaced trust, representing their reliance on physical might and strategic defense as their primary source of security.
  • house of the forest (Hebrew, _bayith _yaʻar'__, H1004): (bayith, "house") and H3293 (yaʻar, "forest"). This phrase refers to a specific, grand royal building in Jerusalem, Solomon's House of the Forest of Lebanon (1 Kings 7:2), so named for its numerous cedar pillars. It served as a royal armory and treasury, making it a prominent symbol of human military might, accumulated wealth, and self-reliance, which Judah mistakenly looked to for salvation.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And he discovered the covering of Judah": This clause describes a decisive divine action or allowance. The implicit "he" is God, who removes or exposes Judah's protective "covering" (Hebrew: mâçâk, a veil or curtain). This signifies the sovereign withdrawal of divine protection, revealing Judah's naked vulnerability to external threats. It's a powerful and intentional image of God lifting the veil of security, making their precarious and unprotected situation undeniably clear as a consequence of their unfaithfulness.
  • "and thou didst look in that day to the armour of the house of the forest.": This clause shifts focus to Judah's immediate and misguided response to their exposed state. Instead of turning to God in repentance and dependence, "thou" (Judah, personified) fixated their gaze ("didst look," Hebrew: nâbaṭ, to look intently, to regard with pleasure or care) on their military arsenal. The "armour of the house of the forest" represents their human-made defenses, strategic preparations, and accumulated wealth, symbolizing a profound reliance on physical strength and material resources rather than seeking divine help or spiritual repentance. The phrase "in that day" emphasizes the critical moment of crisis when this misplaced trust became glaringly evident and condemned.

Literary Devices

Isaiah 22:8 masterfully employs several potent Literary Devices to convey its profound message. Personification is evident as "Judah" is depicted as actively "looking" to its armory, attributing human agency and a misguided focus to the entire nation. This makes the nation's misplaced trust more immediate and relatable. Symbolism is central to the verse's impact; "the covering of Judah" symbolizes divine protection or a false sense of security, and its "discovery" signifies God's judgment or the exposure of vulnerability. Conversely, "the armour of the house of the forest" serves as a powerful symbol of human self-reliance, military might, and material wealth, standing in stark contrast to the spiritual reliance God desires. The sharp contrast between God's action ("he discovered") and Judah's reaction ("thou didst look") creates a stark Juxtaposition, highlighting the spiritual disconnect and the ultimate futility of their human efforts in the face of divine judgment. This rich use of imagery and symbolic language amplifies the prophetic warning against trusting in anything other than the sovereign God.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Isaiah 22:8 profoundly illustrates the theological tension between human self-reliance and divine sovereignty. It reveals God's prerogative to expose the futility of human defenses when a people refuse to acknowledge Him as their ultimate protector and instead place their confidence in earthly provisions. The "uncovering" of Judah's defenses is a divine act of judgment, allowing the nation to face the natural consequences of its misplaced trust. This passage underscores the consistent prophetic message that true security is not found in military might, strategic planning, or accumulated material wealth, but in a humble and repentant turning to the Lord. When humanity elevates its own strength, wisdom, or possessions above God's omnipotence and provision, it invariably finds itself exposed, vulnerable, and ultimately disappointed, highlighting the theological truth that reliance on anything other than the Creator leads to ultimate spiritual barrenness and judgment.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Isaiah 22:8 serves as a timeless and convicting mirror for individuals and nations alike, prompting us to deeply examine where our ultimate trust and hope truly lie, especially during times of crisis and uncertainty. In a world that often instinctively prioritizes self-sufficiency, financial security, political power, or technological advancement, this verse challenges us to consider if these "coverings" have subtly become our idols, diverting our gaze from the true and only source of lasting security. When faced with personal struggles, economic downturns, societal upheavals, or global pandemics, do we frantically "look to the armour of the house of the forest"—our own resources, connections, strategic plans, or accumulated wealth—or do we first and foremost turn to the Lord, acknowledging His supreme sovereignty and seeking His divine provision and protection? This passage calls for a profound re-evaluation of our deepest priorities and allegiances, urging us to cultivate a heart that trusts implicitly in God, even when all human coverings are stripped away and our vulnerabilities are exposed. It reminds us that true peace, enduring security, and ultimate deliverance are found not in what we can amass or control, but in humble, unwavering dependence on the One who "discovers" all false securities to reveal His own unfailing faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "coverings" or sources of security do I tend to rely on most in my life, particularly during times of crisis or perceived threat?
  • How does my initial reaction to difficulty or fear reveal where my ultimate trust truly lies—in human effort and resources, or in divine provision and sovereignty?
  • In what specific ways might I be "looking to the armour of the house of the forest" in my own life instead of diligently seeking God's guidance and strength?
  • What practical steps can I take to cultivate a deeper, more consistent reliance on God in all circumstances, moving from self-sufficiency to divine dependence?

FAQ

What is the significance of "the covering of Judah" being discovered?

Answer: The "covering of Judah" (Hebrew: mâçâk) symbolizes Judah's perceived security, whether it be their physical defenses, their alliances, or a false sense of divine protection. Its "discovery" (Hebrew: gâlâh, to uncover, reveal, or expose) signifies God's sovereign act of removing this protection, thereby exposing Judah's vulnerability and spiritual nakedness. It indicates that God is allowing or orchestrating the revelation of their true, unprotected state, often as a form of judgment for their spiritual unfaithfulness and misplaced trust. This act highlights that their security was never inherent or self-generated, but contingent upon their obedient relationship with God, and when that relationship was broken by idolatry and self-reliance, the covering was removed.

What was the "house of the forest" and why is it mentioned?

Answer: The "house of the forest" (Hebrew: Bêth Yaʻar) refers to a specific, grand royal building in Jerusalem, known as the House of the Forest of Lebanon, built by King Solomon (1 Kings 7:2). It was named for its numerous cedar pillars, which resembled a dense forest. This prominent structure served as a royal armory and treasury, storing weapons, military equipment, and valuable resources. Its mention in Isaiah 22:8 is highly symbolic: it represents Judah's reliance on its military might, accumulated wealth, and human strategic defenses. By "looking to the armour of the house of the forest," the people demonstrated their profound and misplaced trust in human strength and material provisions rather than in God during a time of existential crisis.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Isaiah 22:8, with its poignant depiction of Judah's exposed vulnerability and their tragic misplaced trust in human defenses, finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and redemptive work of Jesus. Judah's failure to "look to their Maker" in their hour of dire need foreshadows humanity's inherent inability to secure itself by its own strength, wisdom, or accumulated resources. The "covering" that was removed from Judah points to the veil of sin that separates humanity from God and the false securities we desperately construct in our fallen state. Jesus, however, is the true and perfect "covering" for His people, the One in whom we find ultimate and eternal security, protection, and righteousness. Unlike Judah, who tragically looked to earthly armor and a physical armory, believers in Christ are called to put on the "whole armour of God" (Ephesians 6:11), which is spiritual, divine, and invincible against the schemes of the enemy. Furthermore, Judah's reliance on a physical armory contrasts sharply with Christ's perfect and unwavering trust in His Father, even unto the ignominious death on the cross, where He disarmed the powers and authorities of darkness, triumphing over them (Colossians 2:15). He is the true "strong tower" to whom the righteous run and are safe (Proverbs 18:10). In Christ, our ultimate defense is not in human might, military prowess, or material possessions, but in His atoning sacrifice, His victorious resurrection power, and His imputed righteousness, providing a perfect and eternal covering that no earthly threat or divine judgment can "discover" or remove (Romans 8:31-39).

Copy as

Commentary on Isaiah 22 verses 8–14

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

What is meant by the covering of Judah, which in the beginning of this paragraph is said to be discovered, is not agreed. The fenced cities of Judah were a covering to the country; but these, being taken by the army of the Assyrians, ceased to be a shelter, so that the whole country lay exposed to be plundered. The weakness of Judah, its nakedness, and inability to keep itself, now appeared more than ever; and thus the covering of Judah was discovered. Its magazines and stores, which had been locked up, were now laid open for the public use. Dr. Lightfoot gives another sense of it, that by this distress into which Judah should be brought God would discover their covering (that is, uncloak their hypocrisy), would show all that was in their heart, as is said of Hezekiah upon another occasion, Ch2 32:31. Thus, by one means or other, the iniquity of Ephraim will be discovered and the sin of Samaria, Hos 7:1.

They were now in a great fright, and in this fright they manifested two things much amiss: -

I. A great contempt of God's goodness, and his power to help them. They made use of all the means they could think of for their own preservation; and it is not for doing this that they are blamed, but, in doing this, they did not acknowledge God. Observe,

1.How careful they were to improve all advantages that might contribute to their safety. When Sennacherib had made himself master of all the defenced cities of Judah, and Jerusalem was left as a cottage in a vineyard, they thought it was time to look about them. A council was immediately called, a council of war; and it was resolved to stand upon their defence, and not tamely to surrender. Pursuant to this resolve, they took all the prudent measures they could for their own security. We tempt God if, in times of danger, we do not the best we can for ourselves. (1.) They inspected the magazines and stores, to see if they were well stocked with arms and ammunition: They looked to the armour of the house of the forest, which Solomon built in Jerusalem for an armoury (Kg1 10:17), and thence they delivered out what they had occasion for. It is the wisdom of princes, in time of peace, to provide for war, that they may not have arms to seek when they should use them, and perhaps upon a sudden emergency. (2.) They viewed the fortifications, the breaches of the city of David; they walked round the walls, and observed where they had gone to decay for want of seasonable repairs, or were broken by some former attempts made upon them. These breaches were many; the more shame for the house of David that they suffered the city of David to lie neglected. They had probably often seen those breaches; but now they saw them to consider what course to take about them. This good we should get by public distresses, we should be awakened by them to repair our breaches, and amend what is amiss. (3.) They made sure of water for the city, and did what they could to deprive the besiegers of it: You gathered together the water of the lower pool, of which there was probably no great store, and of which therefore they were the more concerned to be good husbands. See what a mercy it is that, as nothing is more necessary to the support of human life than water, so nothing is more cheap and common; but it is bad indeed when that, as here, is a scarce commodity. (4.) They numbered the houses of Jerusalem, that every house might send in its quota of men for the public service, or contribute in money to it, which they raised by a poll, so much a head or so much a house. (5.) Because private property ought to give way to the public safety, those houses that stood in their way, when the wall was to be fortified, were broken down, which, in such a case of necessity, is no more an injury to the owner than blowing up houses in case of fire. (6.) They made a ditch between the outer and inner wall, for the greater security of the city; and they contrived to draw the water of the old pool to it, that they might have plenty of water themselves and might deprive the besiegers of it; for it seems that was the project, lest the Assyrian army should come and find much water (Ch2 32:4) and so should be the better able to prolong the siege. If it be lawful to destroy the forage of a country, much more to divert the streams of its waters, for the straitening and starving of an enemy.

2.How regardless they were of God in all these preparations: But you have not looked unto the Maker thereof (that is, of Jerusalem, the city you are so solicitous for the defence of) and of all the advantages which nature has furnished it with for its defence - the mountains round about it (Psa 125:2), and the rivers, which were such as the inhabitants might turn which way soever they pleased for their convenience. Note, (1.) It is God that made his Jerusalem, and fashioned it long ago, in his counsels. The Jewish writers, upon this place, say, There were seven things which God made before the world (meaning which he had in his eye when he made the world): the garden of Eden, the law, the just ones, Israel, the throne of glory, Jerusalem, and Messiah the Prince. The gospel church has God for its Maker. (2.) Whatever service we do, or endeavour to do, at any time to God's Jerusalem, must be done with an eye to him as the Maker of it; and he takes it ill if it be done otherwise. It is here charged upon them that they did not look to God. [1.] They did not design his glory in what they did. They fortified Jerusalem because it was a rich city and their own houses were in it, not because it was the holy city and God's house was in it. In all our cares for the defence of the church we must look more at God's interest in it than at our own. [2.] They did not depend upon him for a blessing upon their endeavours, saw no need of it, and therefore sought not to him for it, but thought their own powers and policies sufficient for them. Of Hezekiah himself it is said that he trusted in God (Kg2 18:5), and particularly upon this occasion (Ch2 32:8); but there were those about him, it seems, who were great statesmen and soldiers, but had little religion in them. [3.] They did not give him thanks for the advantages they had, in fortifying their city, from the waters of the old pool, which were fashioned long ago, as Kishon is called an ancient river, Jdg 5:21. Whatever in nature is at any time serviceable to us, we must therein acknowledge the goodness of the God of nature, who, when he fashioned it long ago, fitted it to be so, and according to whose ordinance it continues to this day. Every creature is that to us which God makes it to be; and therefore, whatever use it is of to us, we must look at him that fashioned it, bless him for it, and use it for him.

II. A great contempt of God's wrath and justice in contending with them, Isa 22:12-14. Here observe,

1.What was God's design in bringing this calamity upon them: it was to humble them, bring them to repentance, and make them serious. In that day of trouble, and treading down, and perplexity, the Lord did thereby call to weeping and mourning, and all the expressions of sorrow, even to baldness and girding with sackcloth; and all this to lament their sins (by which they had brought those judgments upon their land), to enforce their prayers (by which they might hope to avert the judgments that were breaking in), and to dispose themselves to a reformation of their lives by a holy seriousness and a tenderness of heart under the word of God. To this God called them by his prophet's explaining his providences, and by his providences awakening them to regard what his prophets said. Note, When God threatens us with his judgments he expects and requires that we humble ourselves under his mighty hand, that we tremble when the lion roars, and in a day of adversity consider.

2.How contrary they walked to this design of God (Isa 22:13): Behold, joy and gladness, mirth and feasting, all the gaiety and all the jollity imaginable. They were as secure and cheerful as they used to be, as if they had had no enemy in their borders or were in no danger of falling into his hands. When they had taken the necessary precautions for their security, then they set all deaths and dangers at defiance, and resolved to be merry, let come on them what would. Those that should have been among the mourners were among the wine-bibbers, the riotous eaters of flesh; and observe what they said, Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die. This may refer either to the particular danger they were now in, and the fair warning which the prophet gave them of it, or to the general shortness and uncertainty of human life, and the nearness of death at all times. This was the language of the profane scoffers who mocked the messengers of the Lord and misused his prophets. (1.) They made a jest of dying. "The prophet tells us we must die shortly, perhaps tomorrow, and therefore we should mourn and repent today; no, rather let us eat and drink, that we may be fattened for the slaughter, and may be in good heart to meet our doom; if we must have a short life, let it be a merry one." (2.) They ridiculed the doctrine of a future state on the other side death; for, if there were no such state, the apostle grants there would be something of reason in what they said, Co1 15:32. If, when we die, there were an end of us, it were good to make ourselves as easy and merry as we could while we live; but, if for all these things God shall bring us into judgment, it is at our peril if we walk in the way of our heart and the sight of our eyes, Ecc 11:9. Note, A practical disbelief of another life after this is at the bottom of the carnal security and brutish sensuality which are the sin, and shame, and ruin of so great a part of mankind, as of the old world, who were eating and drinking till the flood came.

3.How much God was displeased at it. He signified his resentment of it to the prophet, revealed it in his ears, to be by him proclaimed upon the house-top: Surely this iniquity shall not be purged from you till you die, Isa 22:14. It shall never be expiated with sacrifice and offering, any more than the iniquity of the house of Eli, Sa1 3:14. It is a sin against the remedy, a baffling of the utmost means of conviction and rendering them ineffectual; and therefore it is not likely they should ever repent of it or have it pardoned. The Chaldee reads it, It shall not be forgiven you till you die the second death. Those that walk contrary to them; with the froward he will show himself froward.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 8–14. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Isaiah
(Verses 7-9.) And your chosen valleys will be full of chariots, and the horsemen will set their seats at the gate. And the covering of Judah will be revealed, and on that day you will see the arsenal of the house of the forest, and the breaches of the city of David, for they have multiplied. It clearly describes the captivity that occurred in the eleventh year of King Zedekiah, of which Jeremiah also speaks: Behold, I will summon all the kingdoms of the north, says the Lord, and they will come and each one will set their throne at the entrance of the gates of Jerusalem, and on all its surrounding walls (Jeremiah 1:15). So that what was predicted in word and not fulfilled in deed, Jeremiah also says the same: In the eleventh year of Zedekiah, in the fourth month, on the ninth day of the month, the city was opened, and all the officials of the king of Babylon entered and sat in the middle gate (Jer. 39:2). Therefore, in the surrounding area of the city of Jerusalem, an innumerable army was spread out, and the Holy of Holies and the armory, which had been planted with groves, were opened due to hostile plundering, and the enemy entered through all parts of the city, divided by walls.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Isaiah
(Verses 7-9.) And he took Elam, the quiver, the chariot of a man, and the shield uncovered the wall. And your chosen valleys will be full of chariots, and horsemen will set their seats at the gate. And the covering of Judah will be revealed, and on that day you will see the arsenal of the house of the forest. And you will see the breaches of the city of David, for they are multiplied. LXX: But the Elamites took quivers, climbers, men upon horses, and a gathering of fighters. And your chosen valleys will be filled with chariots, and horsemen will crowd your gates. And they will reveal the gates of Judah, and on that day they will look upon the chosen houses of the city. And they will reveal the hidden things of the houses of the stronghold of David, and they will see that there are many. Aelam, which is interpreted as their ascent, or the Elamites, as the LXX translated it, whom we turn into despisers, have taken up the quiver, to drive the upright in obscurity, who are the horsemen in the chariot of men, to expose the wall of Zion and the foundations of the Church with their shield and attack. 'But', he says, 'your chosen valleys will be,' and humble teachings, oh valley of Zion, full of chariots, which the Lord submerged with Pharaoh, and their horsemen and climbers will place their thrones at your gates, so that they do not allow the besieged and confined to go out from you. Then Almighty God will reveal the coverings of the Jews through the ecclesiastical men; and all their secrets, who are established in the confession of faith, will be revealed. And then, O Valley of Zion, you will see on that day, and in the clear light of truth, all the armor of the Apostle, and the house of the jump, in which the multitude of the nations stands. Just as it is sung in Psalm 131: Behold, we have heard of it in Ephrata: we have found it in the fields of the forest. But when the veil of the Jews and their secret, which was previously concealed due to mystery, has been revealed, and you see the armor of the Church; then you will understand the divisions of the city of David, which you have multiplied, in order to gather deceived peoples to yourself. These Elamites, according to the edition of the Septuagint, do not have a single quiver, but many; and they are mounted on men who ride on souls; and there is a great multitude preparing for battle against the Church, so that all its valleys are filled; and the horsemen hinder their senses, and by their conflict provoke the Ecclesiastical man, who is called Judas, to contend; so that, as he presents testimonies of the Scriptures and refutes all lies, the heretics will see the houses of the city of David, and know all the previously secret things, how in the stronghold of David, which means the strong hand, that is, of Christ, all the dogmas of truth exist. These are obscure places, not only according to history, but also according to reasoning. Therefore, those who are displeased with ours should present their own, so that we may agree with their explanation if it is true.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Isaiah 22:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.