TRV
Translation
King James Version
And when Haman saw that Mordecai bowed not, nor did him reverence, then was Haman full of wrath.
Complete Jewish Bible
Haman was furious when he saw that Mordekhai was not kneeling and bowing down to him.
Berean Standard Bible
When Haman saw that Mordecai would not bow down or pay him homage, he was filled with rage.
American Standard Version
And when Haman saw that Mordecai bowed not down, nor did him reverence, then was Haman full of wrath.
World English Bible Messianic
When Haman saw that Mordecai didn’t bow down, nor pay him homage, Haman was full of wrath.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when Haman sawe that Mordecai bowed not the knee vnto him, nor did reuerence vnto him, then Haman was full of wrath.
Young's Literal Translation
And Haman seeth that Mordecai is not bowing and doing obeisance to him, and Haman is full of fury,
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 12,753 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on Esther 3 verses 1–6
1 ¶ After these things did king Ahasuerus promote Haman the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, and advanced him, and set his seat above all the princes that were with him.
2 And all the king's servants, that were in the king's gate, bowed, and reverenced Haman: for the king had so commanded concerning him. But Mordecai bowed not, nor did him reverence.
3 Then the king's servants, which were in the king's gate, said unto Mordecai, Why transgressest thou the king's commandment?
4 Now it came to pass, when they spake daily unto him, and he hearkened not unto them, that they told Haman, to see whether Mordecai's matters would stand: for he had told them that he was a Jew.
5 And when Haman saw that Mordecai bowed not, nor did him reverence, then was Haman full of wrath.
6 And he thought scorn to lay hands on Mordecai alone; for they had shewed him the people of Mordecai: wherefore Haman sought to destroy all the Jews that were throughout the whole kingdom of Ahasuerus, even the people of Mordecai.
Here we have,
I. Haman advanced by the prince, and adored thereupon by the people. Ahasuerus had lately laid Esther in his bosom, but she had no such interest in him as to get her friends preferred, or to prevent the preferring of one who she knew was an enemy to her people. When those that are good become great they still find that they cannot do good, nor prevent mischief, as they would. This Haman was an Agagite (an Amalekite, says Josephus), probably of the descendants of Agag, a common name of the princes of Amalek, as appears, Num 24:7. Some think that he was by birth a prince, as Jehoiakim was, whose seat was set above the rest of the captive kings (Kg2 25:28), as Haman's here was, Est 3:1. The king took a fancy to him (princes are not bound to give reasons for their favours), made him his favourite, his confidant, his prime-minister of state. Such a commanding influence the court then had that (contrary to the proverb) those whom it blessed the country blessed too; for all men adored this rising sun, and the king's servants were particularly commanded to bow before him and to do him reverence (Est 3:2), and they did so. I wonder what the king saw in Haman that was commendable or meritorious; it is plain that he was not a man of honour or justice, of any true courage or steady conduct, but proud, and passionate, and revengeful; yet was he promoted, and caressed, and there was none so great as he. Princes' darlings are not always worthies.
II. Mordecai adhering to his principles with a bold and daring resolution, and therefore refusing to reverence Haman as the rest of the king's servants did, Est 3:2. He was urged to it by his friends, who reminded him of the king's commandment, and consequently of the danger he incurred if he refused to comply with it; it was as much as his life was worth, especially considering Haman's insolence, Est 3:3. They spoke daily to him (Est 3:4), to persuade him to conform, but all in vain: he hearkened not to them, but told them plainly that he was a Jew, and could not in conscience do it. Doubtless his refusal, when it came to be taken notice of and made the subject of discourse, was commonly attributed to pride and envy, that he would not pay respect to Haman because, on the score of his alliance to Esther, he was not himself as much promoted, or to a factious seditious spirit and a disaffection to the king and his government; those that would make the best of it looked upon it as his weakness, or his want of breeding, called it a humour, and a piece of affected singularity. It does not appear that any one scrupled at conforming to it except Mordecai; and yet his refusal was pious, conscientious, and pleasing to God, for the religion of a Jew forbade him, 1. To give such extravagant honours as were required to any mortal man, especially so wicked a man as Haman was. In the apocryphal chapters of this book (ch. 13:12-14) Mordecai is brought in thus appealing to God in this matter: Thou knowest, Lord, that it was neither in contempt nor pride, nor for any desire of glory, that I did not bow down to proud Haman, for I could have been content with good will, for the salvation of Israel, to kiss the soles of his feet; but I did this that I might not prefer the glory of man above the glory of God, neither will I worship any but thee. 2. He especially thought it a piece of injustice to his nation to give such honour to an Amalekite, one of that devoted nation with which God had sworn that he would have perpetual war (Exo 17:16) and concerning which he had given that solemn charge (Deu 25:17), Remember what Amalek did. Though religion does by no means destroy good manners, but teaches us to render honour to whom honour is due, yet it is the character of a citizen of Zion that not only in his heart, but in his eyes, such a vile person as Haman was is contemned, Psa 15:4. Let those who are governed by principles of conscience be steady and resolute, however censured or threatened, as Mordecai was.
III. Haman meditating revenge. Some that hoped thereby to curry favour with Haman took notice to him of Mordecai's rudeness, waiting to see whether he would bend or break, Est 3:4. Haman then observed it himself, and was full of wrath, Est 3:5. A meek and humble man would have slighted the affront, and have said, "Let him have his humour; what am I the worse for it?" But it makes Haman's proud spirit rage, and fret, and boil, within him, so that he becomes uneasy to himself and all about him. It is soon resolved that Mordecai must die. The head must come off that will not bow to Haman; if he cannot have his honours, he will have his blood. It is as penal in this court not to worship Haman as it was in Nebuchadnezzar's not to worship the golden image which he had set up. Mordecai is a person of quality, in a post of honour, and own cousin to the queen; and yet Haman thinks his life nothing towards a satisfaction for the affront: thousands of innocent and valuable lives must be sacrificed to his indignation; and therefore he vows the destruction of all the people of Mordecai, for his sake, because his being a Jew was the reason he gave why he did not reverence Haman. Herein appear Haman's intolerable pride, insatiable cruelty, and the ancient antipathy of an Amalekite to the Israel of God. Saul the son of Kish, a Benjamite, spared Agag, but Mordecai the son of Kish, a Benjamite (Est 2:5), shall find no mercy with this Agagite, whose design is to destroy all the Jews throughout the whole kingdom of Ahasuerus (Est 3:6), which, I suppose, would include those that had returned to their own land, for that was now a province of his kingdom. Come and let us cut them off from being a nation, Psa 83:4. Nero's barbarous wish is his, that they had all but one neck.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–6. Public domain.
Copy as
Rabanus MaurusAD 856
EXPLANATION ON THE BOOK OF ESTHER 6
Nothing else is symbolized by the arrogant Haman than the opulence of the powerful of this world who take advantage of the benefits conceded to them by divine mercy. They despise allowing their neighbors, who are given to them as companions by nature, to have as sharers of such grace. Therefore they are guilty of striving to transfer to themselves the honor and reverence that are rightly due to God alone. And so they pursue with hatred all those who do not want to act according to such behavior or comply with it. They persecute them with afflictions and endeavor to put them to death. But the heavenly judge, “who regards the lowly, and perceives the haughty from far away, who knows the deceiver and he, who is deceived, makes the pain return upon the heads of the sinful, and their iniquity descends on their head. The sinful are caught in their own traps: the righteous will be freed from their anguish, the impious will be handed over in their stead.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Esther 3:5 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Esther 3:5 marks a pivotal moment in the narrative, portraying Haman's intense fury upon personally observing Mordecai's steadfast refusal to bow and show him reverence. This verse serves as the immediate and direct catalyst for Haman's subsequent genocidal plot against the Jewish people, transforming a personal slight into a national crisis and setting the stage for the unfolding drama of divine providence and deliverance.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed as the climax of an escalating tension between Haman and Mordecai. It immediately follows the king's decree elevating Haman to a position of supreme authority, demanding universal obeisance from all royal servants, as detailed in Esther 3:1-2. Mordecai's consistent defiance of this command, despite the repeated questioning and reporting by other royal officials, is highlighted in Esther 3:3-4. Esther 3:5 is the dramatic turning point where Haman's awareness of Mordecai's insubordination shifts from hearsay to direct observation, igniting his personal wrath. This explosion of fury directly precipitates Haman's vengeful and sweeping plan to annihilate all Jews in the kingdom, as immediately unfolded in Esther 3:6. Thus, this verse is the critical hinge from simmering conflict to overt, destructive action.
Historical & Cultural Context: In the vast Persian Empire, the act of bowing or prostrating oneself before a monarch or a highly esteemed official like Haman was a deeply ingrained cultural practice, signifying respect, submission, and recognition of authority. Such gestures were not merely polite formalities but often carried significant political and social weight, reflecting the established power hierarchy. Haman, as the newly appointed vizier, would have expected and demanded absolute and universal obeisance as a testament to his elevated status and the king's favor. Mordecai's refusal, therefore, was not a minor social gaffe but a profound act of defiance against a royal decree and a direct challenge to Haman's authority and inflated ego. While the text does not explicitly state Mordecai's motivation, Jewish tradition and theological understanding strongly suggest it stemmed from his identity as a Jew, who would reserve such profound reverence or prostration, particularly if it bordered on worship, for God alone. Furthermore, the narrative implicitly draws on a deep-seated historical animosity: Haman is identified as an Agagite, a descendant of King Agag of the Amalekites, a people group with whom Israel had a long-standing, divinely ordained conflict, dating back to the Exodus (Exodus 17:16) and culminating in King Saul's incomplete destruction of them (1 Samuel 15:8). This historical backdrop adds a layer of ancient, tribal antagonism to the personal slight.
Key Themes: Esther 3:5 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Esther. Foremost is the theme of Pride vs. Humility, vividly contrasting Haman's insatiable arrogance and demand for absolute submission with Mordecai's steadfast refusal, likely rooted in a deeper conviction and faithfulness to God. This verse also serves as the undeniable Catalyst for Conflict, transforming a localized, personal affront into a kingdom-wide genocidal threat against the Jewish people, thereby setting in motion the central dramatic tension of the book. Furthermore, it subtly introduces the theme of Divine Providence, demonstrating how a seemingly small act of individual defiance, fueled by conviction, becomes the very spark that God uses to orchestrate the deliverance of His chosen people, ultimately leading to the dramatic reversal of fortunes and Haman's downfall, as seen in Esther 7.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The verse employs several potent literary devices to heighten its dramatic impact. Foreshadowing is prominent, as Haman's immediate and extreme "wrath" hints at the disproportionate and destructive actions he will soon take against the entire Jewish population, far exceeding a mere personal vendetta. The direct Antagonism between Haman and Mordecai is starkly established, setting up the central conflict of the narrative and defining the primary opposing forces. There is also a strong sense of Juxtaposition between Mordecai's quiet, steadfast defiance and Haman's explosive, over-the-top rage, highlighting their contrasting characters, motivations, and moral stances. Finally, the phrase "full of wrath" can be seen as a form of Hyperbole, emphasizing the overwhelming intensity and consuming nature of Haman's fury, which goes beyond mere irritation to a deep-seated, destructive passion that will drive the plot forward.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Esther 3:5 serves as a powerful illustration of the destructive nature of unchecked pride and the profound impact of individual conviction in the face of tyranny. Haman's demand for absolute reverence, born of his inflated ego and insatiable desire for honor, clashes directly with Mordecai's refusal, which is implicitly rooted in a deep-seated faithfulness to God that prohibits bowing in a manner that might compromise divine sovereignty or acknowledge a human as worthy of ultimate veneration. This confrontation highlights how human pride, when left unchecked, can escalate into irrational hatred and genocidal intent. Conversely, Mordecai's quiet yet firm act of faithfulness, even in seemingly small or defiant gestures, becomes the pivot point for God's redemptive plan. The narrative implicitly affirms God's providential care for His people, demonstrating that He works through the choices and actions of individuals, even those seemingly insignificant or perilous, to accomplish His sovereign purposes and ensure the preservation of His covenant people.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Haman's explosive wrath in response to a perceived slight serves as a stark warning about the insidious dangers of unchecked pride and the destructive power of personal offense. When our sense of self-importance is so inflated that any challenge to our authority, dignity, or expectations elicits disproportionate rage, we become vulnerable to malice, vengeful thoughts, and destructive intentions. This narrative calls us to a profound self-examination of our own reactions to defiance, disrespect, or even minor inconveniences. Do we respond with humility, grace, and a willingness to understand, or do we allow pride to ignite a consuming anger that seeks to control, punish, or harm others? Conversely, Mordecai's quiet but firm refusal to bow, likely rooted in deep conviction, challenges us to consider what principles and truths we hold so dear that we would stand firm, even in the face of immense pressure, social ostracism, or personal danger. His example reminds us that faithfulness to deeply held beliefs, even when unpopular or costly, can be a powerful force, and that God can use our steadfastness in unexpected ways to bring about His greater purposes in the world.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Mordecai refuse to bow to Haman?
Answer: The book of Esther does not explicitly state Mordecai's reason, but the most widely accepted and biblically consistent interpretation is that his refusal was rooted in his Jewish identity and religious conviction. As a Jew, Mordecai would have reserved the deepest forms of reverence and prostration for God alone, as seen in various biblical accounts where true worship is directed solely to the Almighty. Bowing to Haman, especially given Haman's elevated status and the king's command for all to "reverence" him, could have been perceived as an act that bordered on idolatry or compromised his loyalty to God. Furthermore, Haman was identified as an Agagite, a descendant of the Amalekites, who were perpetual and divinely cursed enemies of Israel (Exodus 17:16). Mordecai, a Benjaminite (from the tribe of Saul, who was commanded to destroy the Amalekites in 1 Samuel 15), would have been acutely aware of this profound historical and theological animosity. His defiance was therefore likely a principled stand, a refusal to honor a sworn enemy of his people and, more importantly, an act of faithfulness to his God.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Esther 3:5, while not directly prophetic, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate conflict between the kingdom of God and the forces of evil, culminating in Christ's triumphant work. Haman's immense pride and consuming wrath, triggered by Mordecai's refusal to bow, mirrors the spiritual arrogance of Satan, who demanded worship from Christ Himself (Matthew 4:9) and relentlessly seeks to destroy God's people. Just as Haman's plot was aimed at the extermination of the Jews, through whom the Messiah would come, so too does spiritual evil constantly seek to thwart God's redemptive plan for humanity. Mordecai's steadfast refusal to bow, a quiet act of conviction and obedience to a higher principle, prefigures Christ's perfect obedience and unwavering steadfastness unto death, even when faced with the ultimate temptation to compromise His divine mission and avoid suffering (Philippians 2:8). Haman's rage, though seemingly triumphant for a time, ultimately leads to his own downfall on the very gallows he prepared for Mordecai, a powerful echo of the cross. At the cross, the apparent victory of evil over Christ was, in fact, the decisive defeat of sin, death, and the powers of darkness (Colossians 2:15). The miraculous deliverance of the Jews, orchestrated through Mordecai's faithfulness and Esther's courage, points to the greater salvation wrought by Christ, who, as the true Lamb of God, takes away the sin of the world and delivers His people from eternal wrath and condemnation (John 1:29). Thus, this verse, with its themes of pride, wrath, and steadfastness in the face of existential threat, ultimately points to the grander narrative of redemption found in Jesus Christ, whose victory ensures that no plot of evil can ultimately prevail against God's chosen people (Romans 8:31).