Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Only unto the land of the children of Ammon thou camest not, nor unto any place of the river Jabbok, nor unto the cities in the mountains, nor unto whatsoever the LORD our God forbad us.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Only unto the land H776 of the children H1121 of Ammon H5983 thou camest H7126 not, nor unto any place H3027 of the river H5158 Jabbok H2999, nor unto the cities H5892 in the mountains H2022, nor unto whatsoever the LORD H3068 our God H430 forbad H6680 us.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The only land you didn't approach was that of the descendants of 'Amon - the region around the Yabok River, the cities in the hills and wherever else ADONAI our God forbade us to go.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But you did not go near the land of the Ammonites, or the land along the banks of the Jabbok River, or the cities of the hill country, or any place that the LORD our God had forbidden.
Ask
American Standard Version
only to the land of the children of Ammon thou camest not near; all the side of the river Jabbok, and the cities of the hill-country, and wheresoever Jehovah our God forbade us.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Only to the land of the children of Ammon you didn’t come near; all the side of the river Jabbok, and the cities of the hill country, and wherever the LORD our God forbade us.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Onely vnto the land of the children of Ammon thou camest not, nor vnto any place of the riuer Iabbok, nor vnto the cities in the mountaines, nor vnto whatsoeuer the Lord our God forbade vs.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`Only, unto the land of the sons of Ammon thou hast not drawn near, any part of the brook Jabbok, and cities of the hill-country, and anything which Jehovah our God hath not commanded.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Wandering in the Wilderness
Wandering in the Wilderness View full PDF
The Defeat of Sihon and Og
The Defeat of Sihon and Og View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 4,976 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Deuteronomy 2:37 serves as a crucial concluding statement in Moses' historical review, affirming Israel's meticulous obedience to God's specific commands regarding the territories they were forbidden to conquer or enter during their wilderness journey. Following accounts of their successful passage through Edom and Moab, and their subsequent victories over Sihon and Og, this verse specifically highlights their restraint concerning the land of the Ammonites, including the region of the Jabbok River and its mountainous cities. It powerfully underscores the profound importance of divine directives, emphasizing that Israel's movements and conquests were not driven by human ambition or strategic advantage but meticulously guided by the sovereign will and precise boundaries established by the LORD their God.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse provides a climactic summary within Moses' extensive historical review, delivered to the new generation of Israelites on the plains of Moab, poised to enter the Promised Land. It immediately follows the detailed recounting of Israel's divinely sanctioned victories over Sihon, king of Heshbon, and Og, king of Bashan, whose lands God explicitly granted to Israel as a possession. Prior to these conquests, Moses recounted Israel's peaceful, albeit circuitous, passage through the territories of Edom and Moab, nations God commanded Israel not to provoke or dispossess due to their kinship with Israel through Esau and Lot. Deuteronomy 2:37 functions as a capstone, affirming that Israel's obedience was comprehensive, extending not only to conquering what God commanded but also to meticulously avoiding what He forbade. This reinforces the overarching theme of covenant faithfulness and the absolute necessity of adherence to divine guidance that permeates the entire book of Deuteronomy.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Ammonites, like the Moabites, were descendants of Lot, Abraham's nephew, as detailed in Genesis 19:38. God's command in Deuteronomy 2:19 not to "distress" or "meddle with" them stemmed from His sovereign decision to grant them their land as a possession, just as He had done for Edom and Moab. This demonstrates God's broader providential care and justice for all nations, even those outside the direct covenant with Israel. The Jabbok River (modern Zarqa River) served as a significant geographical boundary, flowing into the Jordan River and historically marking the northern border of Ammonite territory. This river also held ancient significance as the site of Jacob's wrestling with God in Genesis 32:22-32, adding a layer of historical resonance to the region. Israel's strict adherence to this boundary, even amidst their military successes, highlights a cultural understanding of divinely ordained territorial rights and the sanctity of God's commands.
  • Key Themes: Deuteronomy 2:37 powerfully contributes to several foundational themes within Deuteronomy and the broader Pentateuch. Firstly, it underscores Divine Sovereignty and Guidance, demonstrating unequivocally that God, not Israel's military might or strategic planning, dictated the precise boundaries of their conquests and movements. He had a master plan for the entire region and its inhabitants, guiding Israel's every step. Secondly, it highlights the paramount importance of Obedience to God's Specific Commands. Israel's adherence to the command to avoid the Ammonites is presented as a crucial aspect of their faithfulness. Their success was not solely in conquering what God gave them, but equally in refraining from what He forbade, emphasizing that true obedience encompasses both action and restraint, echoing the call for complete obedience found in Joshua 1:7. Lastly, it illustrates Respect for God-ordained Boundaries. Even in a period of conquest and expansion, God established clear limits. These limits were not arbitrary but rooted in His broader covenant purposes and His just governance over all peoples and territories.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Children (Hebrew, bên', H1121): bên refers to a son, but in a wider sense, it denotes a descendant, offspring, or even a member of a group or nation. In "children of Ammon," it signifies the direct descendants and collective people of Ammon, emphasizing their lineage from Lot and their distinct national identity. This term underscores the familial relationship that God acknowledged and respected, leading to the command for Israel to avoid their territory.
  • Land (Hebrew, ʼerets', H776): ʼerets refers to the earth at large or, more specifically, a particular land or country. In this context, "the land of the children of Ammon" refers to the specific geographical territory that God had allotted to the Ammonites as their possession. The use of this word emphasizes the tangible, defined nature of the prohibited area, highlighting God's precise and sovereign allocation of territories to different peoples.
  • Forbad (Hebrew, tsâvâh', H6680): tsâvâh (in the Niphal or Piel stem) means "to constitute," "enjoin," "appoint," or "command." In the phrase "whatsoever the LORD our God forbad us," it conveys a strong, active prohibition or restraint imposed by God. It implies that God Himself actively held Israel back or prevented them from entering these territories, rather than merely issuing a passive command. This emphasizes God's direct involvement and sovereign control over Israel's movements, reinforcing that their journey and conquests were entirely under His divine leading and not merely human strategy or discretion.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Only unto the land of the children of Ammon thou camest not,": This opening clause establishes the specific exception to Israel's otherwise successful military campaigns and territorial acquisitions. It directly states that Israel did not enter the territory belonging to the Ammonites, emphasizing their strict adherence to God's prior command given in Deuteronomy 2:19. This highlights Israel's obedience and God's sovereign protection over the Ammonites' land.
  • "[nor] unto any place of the river Jabbok,": This phrase specifies a key geographical marker within or bordering Ammonite territory. The Jabbok River served as a natural boundary, and its inclusion underscores the precision of God's prohibition. Israel's avoidance of this significant landmark further confirms their meticulous adherence to the divine command, respecting the God-ordained limits.
  • "nor unto the cities in the mountains,": This expands the scope of the prohibited territory to include the urban centers located in the mountainous regions of Ammon. It indicates that the prohibition was comprehensive, covering not just the open land or river boundaries but also the populated areas, leaving no ambiguity about the extent of the restricted zone.
  • "nor unto whatsoever the LORD our God forbad us.": This concluding, summarizing phrase serves as a powerful theological statement. It generalizes the specific prohibitions concerning Ammon, the Jabbok, and the mountain cities to encompass "whatsoever" God had forbidden. This emphasizes the principle of complete and unwavering obedience to all divine commands, whether explicitly stated or implicitly understood, reinforcing God's absolute authority and Israel's faithful submission to His will in every aspect of their journey and conquest.

Literary Devices

Deuteronomy 2:37 employs several literary devices to convey its message effectively. The most prominent is anaphora, specifically through the repeated use of "nor unto" ("neither...nor...nor..."). This rhetorical device creates a cumulative effect, emphasizing the comprehensive nature of Israel's obedience and the full extent of the prohibited territories. It builds a sense of thoroughness and meticulous adherence to God's commands, underscoring that no part of the forbidden zone was entered. The verse also utilizes geographic specificity by naming "the land of the children of Ammon," "the river Jabbok," and "the cities in the mountains," which grounds the theological principle of obedience in concrete, verifiable historical actions. This specificity lends credibility to Moses' recounting and underscores the reality of God's precise instructions. Finally, the concluding phrase, "nor unto whatsoever the LORD our God forbad us," functions as a powerful summary statement and generalization. It elevates the specific examples of Ammonite territory into a broader principle of complete obedience to God's every prohibition, reinforcing the theme of divine sovereignty and Israel's covenant responsibility.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Deuteronomy 2:37 profoundly illustrates the principle of divine sovereignty over all nations and the necessity of absolute obedience for God's covenant people. It reveals that God's plan extends beyond the immediate concerns of Israel; He has established boundaries and purposes for other nations as well, even those outside the direct covenant line. Israel's restraint, despite their military strength and divine backing for conquest elsewhere, showcases a mature faith that trusts God's "no" as much as His "go." This obedience is not merely a matter of following rules but a deep recognition that God's wisdom is supreme, and His commands, even when seemingly counter-intuitive, are always for the greater good and part of His perfect, overarching plan for history and humanity. It reminds us that true faithfulness involves discerning and submitting to God's will in its entirety, including the paths He forbids us to take.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Deuteronomy 2:37 offers a profound lesson for believers today: true obedience to God involves not only actively pursuing what He commands but also faithfully refraining from what He forbids. In a world that often encourages boundless ambition and the pursuit of every perceived opportunity, this verse calls us to discern God's "no" with as much diligence as we seek His "yes." It reminds us that divine boundaries are not arbitrary restrictions but expressions of God's perfect wisdom, protection, and broader purposes, which often extend beyond our immediate understanding. Trusting God's wisdom means acknowledging that He has a comprehensive plan, not just for our individual lives, but for the entire world, and that His prohibitions are integral to His righteous governance. Our willingness to walk away from opportunities or desires that God has clearly marked as off-limits demonstrates a deep trust in His sovereign goodness and a recognition that His path, even when it involves restraint, is always the path of life and blessing, leading to true flourishing and alignment with His divine will.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life might God be calling me to exercise restraint or to avoid certain paths, even if they seem appealing or beneficial from a worldly perspective?
  • How does my willingness to accept God's "no" reflect my trust in His sovereign wisdom and His comprehensive plan for my life and the world?
  • What are the practical implications of understanding that God has boundaries and purposes for all people and nations, not just for His covenant community, and how does this shape my worldview?

FAQ

Why did God forbid Israel from entering the land of the Ammonites, especially after allowing them to conquer other nations?

Answer: God's command for Israel to avoid the Ammonite (and Moabite) territory, as stated in Deuteronomy 2:19 and confirmed in Deuteronomy 2:37, was rooted in His sovereign plan and justice for all nations. The Ammonites and Moabites were descendants of Lot, Abraham's nephew (Genesis 19:37-38), establishing a kinship tie with Israel. Unlike the Amorites (Sihon and Og's kingdoms), whose "iniquity was not yet complete" (Genesis 15:16), but eventually reached a point where divine judgment was due, God had already granted the Ammonites their land as a permanent possession. This demonstrates that God's justice is not arbitrary; He has specific times and reasons for the rise and fall of nations. His command to Israel was not a sign of weakness but an expression of His righteous governance over all the earth, respecting the established boundaries and purposes He had for these peoples, even as He fulfilled His covenant promises to Israel by giving them the land of Canaan. It highlights that Israel's conquests were not driven by imperialistic ambition but by divine commission, operating strictly within God's revealed will and boundaries.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Deuteronomy 2:37, with its emphasis on Israel's meticulous obedience to God's divinely ordained boundaries and prohibitions, finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment. Jesus Christ is the ultimate embodiment of perfect obedience, perfectly living out the Father's will in every aspect of His life and ministry, fulfilling "whatsoever the LORD our God forbad us" not by mere avoidance, but by perfectly keeping the law and submitting to the Father's plan. Unlike Israel, who often struggled with obedience and transgressed divine boundaries, Christ perfectly submitted to the Father's will, even to the point of death on a cross (Philippians 2:8). He did not come to abolish the Law but to fulfill it (Matthew 5:17), demonstrating the perfect righteousness required by God. Furthermore, just as God set physical boundaries for Israel's earthly inheritance, Christ establishes spiritual boundaries for His new covenant people, the church. His kingdom is "not of this world" (John 18:36), and His followers are called to live by a new law—the law of Christ—which emphasizes love, grace, and obedience to His commands (John 13:34). The ultimate "Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world" (John 1:29) perfectly navigated the Father's will, establishing a spiritual inheritance far greater than any earthly land, inviting all who believe to enter His eternal rest and kingdom, which transcends all geographical and national boundaries (Hebrews 4:9-10).

Copy as

Commentary on Deuteronomy 2 verses 24–37

God having tried the self-denial of his people in forbidding them to meddle with the Moabites and Ammonites, and they having quietly passed by those rich countries, and, though superior in number, not made any attack upon them, here he recompenses them for their obedience by giving them possession of the country of Sihon king of the Amorites. If we forbear what God forbids, we shall receive what he promises, and shall be no losers at last by our obedience, though it may seem for the present to be to our loss. Wrong not others, and God shall right thee.

I. God gives them commission to seize upon the country of Sihon king of Heshbon, Deu 2:24, Deu 2:25. This was then God's way of disposing of kingdoms, but such particular grants are not now either to be expected or pretended. In this commission observe, 1. Though God assured them that the land should be their own, yet they must bestir themselves, and contend in battle with the enemy. What God gives we must endeavour to get. 2. God promises that when they fight he will fight for them. Do you begin to possess it, and I will begin to put the dread of you upon them. God would dispirit the enemy and so destroy them, would magnify Israel and so terrify all those against whom they were commissioned. See Exo 15:14.

II. Moses sends to Sihon a message of peace, and only begs a passage through his land, with a promise to give his country no disturbance, but the advantage of trading for ready money with so great a body, Deu 2:26-29. Moses herein did neither disobey God, who bade him contend with Sihon, nor dissemble with Sihon; but doubtless it was by divine direction that he did it, that Sihon might be left inexcusable, though God hardened his heart. This may illustrate the method of God's dealing with those to whom he gives his gospel, but does not give grace to believe it.

III. Sihon began the war (Deu 2:32), God having made his heart obstinate, and hidden from his eyes the thing that belonged to his peace (Deu 2:30), that he might deliver him into the hand of Israel. Those that meddle with the people of God meddle to their own hurt; and God sometimes ruins his enemies by their own resolves. See Mic 4:11-13; Rev 16:14.

IV. Israel was victorious. 1. They put all the Amorites to the sword, men, women, and children (Deu 2:33, Deu 2:34); this they did as the executioners of God's wrath; now the measure of the Amorites' iniquity was full (Gen 15:16), and the longer it was in the filling the sorer was the reckoning at last. This was one of the devoted nations. They died, not as Israel's enemies, but as sacrifices to divine justice, in the offering of which sacrifices Israel was employed, as a kingdom of priests. The case being therefore extraordinary, it ought not to be drawn into a precedent for military executions, which make no distinction and give no quarter: those will have judgment without mercy that show no mercy. 2. They took possession of all they had; their cities (Deu 2:34), their goods (Deu 2:35), and their land, Deu 2:36. The wealth of the sinner is laid up for the just. What a new world did Israel now come into! Most of them were born, and had lived all their days, in a vast howling wilderness, where they knew not what either fields or cities were, had no houses to dwell in, and neither sowed nor reaped; and now of a sudden to become masters of a country so well built, so well husbanded, this made them amends for their long waiting, and yet it was but the earnest of a great deal more. Much more joyful will the change be which holy souls will experience when they remove out of the wilderness of this world to the better country, that is, the heavenly, to the city that has foundations.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 24–37. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Deuteronomy 2:37 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.