TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Daniel 8:1–14. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. The date of this vision, Dan 8:1. It was in the third year of the reign of Belshazzar, which proved to be his last year, as many reckon; so that this chapter also should be, in order of time, before the fifth. That Daniel might not be surprised at the destruction of Babylon, now at hand, God gives him a foresight of the destruction of other kingdoms hereafter, which in their day had been as potent as that of Babylon. Could we foresee the changes that shall be hereafter, when we are gone, we should the less admire, and be less affected with, the changes in our own day; for that which is done is that which shall be done, Ecc 1:9. Then it was that a vision appeared to me, even to me, Daniel. Here he solemnly attests the truth of it: it was to him, even to him, that the vision was shown; he was the eye-witness of it. And this vision puts him in mind of a former vision which appeared to him at the first, in the first year of this reign, which he makes mention of because this vision was an explication and confirmation of that, and points at many of the same events. That seems to have been a dream, a vision in his sleep; this seems to have been when he was awake.
II.The scene of this vision.
The place where that was laid was in Shushan the palace, one of the royal seats of the kings of Persia, situated on the banks of the river Ulai, which surrounded the city; it was in the province of Elam, that part of Persia which lay next to Babylon. Daniel was not there in person, for he was now in Babylon, a captive, in some employment under Belshazzar, and might not go to such a distant country, especially being now an enemy's country. But he was there in vision; as Ezekiel, when a captive in Babylon, was often brought, in the spirit, to the land of Israel. Note, The soul may be a liberty when the body is in captivity; for, when we are bound, the Spirit of the Lord is not bound. The vision related to that country, and therefore there he was made to fancy himself to be as strongly as if he had really been there.
III.The vision itself and the process of it.
1.He saw a ram with two horns, Dan 8:3. This was the second monarchy, of which the kingdoms of Media and Persia were the two horns. The horns were very high; but that which came up last was the higher, and got the start of the former. So the last shall be first, and the first last. The kingdom of Persia, which rose last, in Cyrus, became more eminent than that of the Medes.
2.He saw this ram pushing all about him with his horns (Dan 8:4), westward (towards Babylon, Syria, Greece, and Asia the less), northward (towards the Lydians, Armenians, and Scythians), and southward (towards Arabia, Ethiopia, and Egypt), for all these nations did the Persian empire, one time or other, make attempts upon for the enlarging of their dominion. And at last he became so powerful that no beasts might stand before him. This ram, though of a species of animal often preyed upon, became formidable even to the beasts of prey themselves, so that there was no standing before him, no escaping him, none that could deliver out of his hand, but all must yield to him: the kings of Persia did according to their will, prospered in all their ways abroad, had an uncontrollable power at home, and became great. He thought himself great because he did what he would; but to do good is that which makes men truly great.
3.He saw this ram overcome by a he-goat. He was considering the ram (wondering that so weak an animal should come to be so prevalent) and thinking what would be the issue; and, behold, a he-goat came, Dan 8:5. This was Alexander the Great, the son of Philip king of Macedonia. He came from the west, from Greece, which lay west from Persia. He fetched a great compass with his army: he came upon the face of the whole earth; he did in effect conquer the world, and then sat down and wept because there was not another world to be conquered. Unus Pellaeo juveni non sufficit orbis - One world was too little for the youth of Pellae. This he-goat (a creature famed for comeliness in going, Pro 30:31) went on with incredible swiftness, so that he touched not the ground, so lightly did he move; he rather seemed to fly above the ground than to go upon the ground; or none touched him in the earth, that is, he met with little or no opposition. This he-goat, or buck, had a notable horn between his eyes, like a unicorn. He had strength, and knew his own strength; he saw himself a match for all his neighbours. Alexander pushed his conquests on so fast, and with so much fury, that none of the kingdoms he attacked had courage to make a stand, or give check to the progress of his victorious arms. In six years he made himself master of the greatest part of the then known world. Well might he be called a notable horn, for his name still lives in history as the name of one of the most celebrated commanders in war that ever the world knew. Alexander's victories and achievements are still the entertainment of the ingenious. This he-goat came to the ram that had two horns, Dan 8:6. Alexander with his victorious army attacked the kingdom of Persia, an army consisting of no more than 30,000 foot and 5000 horse. He ran unto him, to surprise him ere he could get intelligence of his motions, in the fury of his power. He came close to the ram. Alexander with his army came up with Darius Codomannus, then emperor of Persia, being moved with choler against him, Dan 8:7. It was with the greatest violence that Alexander pushed on his war against Darius, who, though he brought vast numbers into the field, yet, for want of skill, was an unequal match for him, so that Alexander was too hard for him whenever he engaged him, smote him, cast him down to the ground, and stamped upon him, which three expressions, some think, refer to the three famous victories that Alexander obtained over Darius, at Granicus, at Issus, and at Arbela, by which he was at length totally routed, having, in the last battle, had 600,000 men killed, so that Alexander became absolute master of all the Persian empire, broke his two horns, the kingdoms of Media and Persia. The ram that had destroyed all before him (Dan 8:4) now is himself destroyed; Darius has no power to stand before Alexander, not has he any friends or allies to help to deliver him out of his hand. Note, Those kingdoms which, when they had power, abused it, and, because none could oppose them, withheld not themselves from the doing of any wrong, may expect to have their power at length taken from them, and to be served in their own kind, Isa 33:1.
4.He saw the he-goat made hereby very considerable; but the great horn, that had done all this execution, was broken, Dan 8:8. Alexander was about twenty years old when he began his wars. When he was about twenty-six he conquered Darius, and became master of the whole Persian empire; but when he was about thirty-two or thirty-three years of age, when he was strong, in his full strength, he was broken. He was not killed in war, in the bed of honour, but died of a drunken surfeit, or, as some suspect, by poison and left no child living behind him to enjoy that which he had endlessly laboured for, but left a lasting monument of the vanity of worldly pomp and power, and their insufficiency to make a man happy.
5.He saw this kingdom divided into four parts, and that instead of that one great horn there came up four notable ones, Alexander's four captains, to whom he bequeathed his conquests; and he had so much that, when it was divided among four, they had each of them enough for any one man. These four notable horns were towards the four winds of heaven, the same with the four heads of the leopard (Dan 7:6), the kingdoms of Syria and Egypt, Asia and Greece - Syria lying to the east, Greece to the west, Asia Minor to the north, and Egypt to the south. Note, Those that heap up riches know not who shall gather them, nor whose all those things shall be which they have provided.
6.He saw a little horn which became a great persecutor of the church and people of God; and this was the principal thing that was intended to be shown to him in this vision, as afterwards, Dan 11:30, etc. All agree that this was Antiochus Epiphanes (so he called himself) - the illustrious, but others called him Antiochus Epimanes - Antiochus the furious. He is called here (as before, Dan 7:8), a little horn, because he was in his original contemptible; there were others between him and the kingdom, and he was of a base servile disposition, had nothing in him of princely qualities, and had been for some time a hostage and prisoner at Rome, whence he made his escape, and, though, the youngest brother, and his elder living, got the kingdom. He waxed exceedingly great towards the south, for he seized upon Egypt, and towards the east, for he invaded Persia and Armenia. But that which is here especially taken notice of is the mischief that he did to the people of the Jews. They are not expressly named, or prophecies must not be too plain; but they are here so described that it would be easy for those who understood scripture-language to know who were meant; and the Jews, having notice of this before, might be awakened to prepare themselves and their children beforehand for these suffering trying times.
(1.)He set himself against the pleasant land, the land of Israel, so called because it was the glory of all lands, for fruitfulness and all the delights of human life, but especially for the tokens of God's presence in it, and its being blessed with divine revelations and institutions; it was Mount Zion that was beautiful for situation, the joy of the whole earth, Psa 48:2. The pleasantness of that land was that there the Messiah was to be born, who would be both the consolation and the glory of his people Israel. Note, We have reason to reckon that a pleasant place which is a holy place, in which God dwells, and where we may have opportunity of communing with him. Surely, It is good to be here.
(2.)He fought against the host of heaven, that is, the people of God, the church, which is the kingdom of heaven, the church-militant here on earth. The saints, being born from above, and citizens of heaven, and doing the will of God, by his grace, in some measure, as the angels of heaven do it, may be well called a heavenly host. Or the priests and Levites, who were employed in the service of the tabernacle, and there warred a good warfare, were this host of heaven. These Antiochus set himself against; he waxed great to the host of heaven, in opposition to them and in defiance of them.
(3.)He cast down some of the host (that is, of the stars, for they are called the host of heaven) to the ground, and stamped upon them. Some of those that were most eminent both in church and state, that were burning and shining lights in their generation, he either forced to comply with his idolatries or put them to death; he got them into his hands, and then trampled upon them and triumphed over them; as good old Eleazar, and the seven brethren, whom he put to death with cruel tortures, because they would not eat swine's flesh, 2 Macc. 6:7. He gloried in it that herein he insulted Heaven itself and exalted his throne above the stars of God, Isa 14:13.
(4.)He magnified himself even to the prince of the host. He set himself against the high priest, Onias, whom he deprived of his dignity, or rather against God himself, who was Israel's King of old, who reigns for ever Zion's King, who himself heads his own host that fight his battles. Against him Antiochus magnified himself; as Pharaoh, when he said, Who is the Lord? Note, Those who persecute the people of God persecute God himself.
(5.)He took away the daily sacrifice. The morning and evening lamb, which God appointed to be offered every day upon his altar to his honour, Antiochus forbade and restrained the offering of. No doubt he took away all other sacrifices, but only the daily sacrifice is mentioned, because that was the greatest loss of all, for in that they kept up their constant communion with God, which they preferred before that which is only occasional. God's people reckon their daily sacrifices, their morning and evening exercises of devotion, the most needful of their daily business and the most delightful of their daily comforts, and would not for all the world part with them.
(6.)He cast down the place of his sanctuary. He did not burn and demolish the temple, but he cast it down, when he profaned it, made it the temple of Jupiter Olympius, and set up his image in it. He also cast down the truth to the ground, trampled upon the book of the law, that word of truth, tore it, and burnt it, and did what he could to destroy it quite, that it might be lost and forgotten for ever. These were the projects of that wicked prince. In these he practised. And (would you think it?) in these he prospered. He carried the matter very far, seemed to have gained his point, and went near to extirpate that holy religion which God's right hand had planted. But lest he or any other should triumph, as if herein he had prevailed against God himself and been too hard for him, the matter is here explained and set in a true light.
[1.]He could not have done this if God had not permitted him to do it, could have had no power against Israel unless it had been given him from above. God put this power into his hand, and gave him a host against the daily sacrifice. God's providence put that sword into his hand by which he was enabled thus to bear down all before him. Note, We ought to eye and own the hand of God in all the enterprises and all the successes of the church's enemies against the church. They are but the rod in God's hand.
[2.]God would not have permitted it if his people had not provoked him to do so. It is by reason of transgression, the transgression of Israel, to correct them for that, that Antiochus is employed to give them all this trouble. Note, When the pleasant land and all its pleasant things are laid waste, it must be acknowledged that sin is the procuring cause of all the desolation. Who gave Jacob to the spoil? Did not the Lord, he against whom we have sinned? Isa 42:24. The great transgression of the Jews after the captivity (when they were cured of idolatry) was a contempt and profanation of the holy things, snuffing at the service of God, bringing the torn and the lame for sacrifice, as if the table of the Lord were a contemptible thing (so we find Mal 1:7, Mal 1:8, etc., and that the priests were guilty of this Mal 2:1, Mal 2:8), and therefore God sent Antiochus to take away the daily sacrifice and cast down the place of his sanctuary. Note, It is just with God to deprive those of the privileges of his house who despise and profane them, and to make those know the worth of ordinances by the want of them who would not know it by the enjoyment of them.
7.He heard the time of this calamity limited and determined, not the time when it should come (that is not here fixed, because God would have his people always prepared for it), but how long it should last, that, when they had no more any prophets to tell them how long (Psa 74:9, which psalm seems to have been calculated for this dark and doleful day), they might have this prophecy to give them a prospect of deliverance in due time. Now concerning this we have here,
(1.)The question asked concerning it, Dan 8:13. Observe [1.] By whom the question was put: I heard one saint speaking to this purport, and then another saint seconded him. "O that we knew how long this trouble will last!" The angels here are called saints, for they are holy ones (Dan 4:13), the holy myriads, Jde 1:14. The angels concern themselves in the affairs of the church, and enquire concerning them, if, as here, concerning its temporal salvations, much more do they desire to look into the great salvation, Pe1 1:12. One saint spoke of the thing, and another enquired concerning it. Thus John, who lay in Christ's bosom, was beckoned to by Peter to ask Christ a question, Joh 13:23, Joh 13:24. [2.] To whom the question was put. He said unto Palmoni that spoke. Some make this certain saint to be a superior angel who understood more than the rest, to whom therefore they came with their enquiries. Others make it to be the eternal Word, the Son of God. He is the unknown One. Palmoni seems to be compounded of Peloni Almoni, which is used (Rut 4:1) for Ho, such a one, and (Kg2 6:8) for such a place. Christ was yet the nameless One. Wherefore asked thou after my name, seeing it is secret? Jdg 13:18. He is the numberer of secrets (as some translate it), for from him there is nothing hidden - the wonderful numberer, so others; his name is called Wonderful. Note, If we would know the mind of God, we must apply to Jesus Christ, who lay in the bosom of the Father, and in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge, not hidden from us, but hidden for us. [3.] The question itself that was asked: "How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice? How long shall the prohibition of it continue? How long shall the pleasant land be made unpleasant by that severe interdict? How long shall the transgression of desolation (the image of Jupiter), that great transgression which makes all our sacred things desolate, how long shall that stand in the temple? How long shall the sanctuary and the host, the holy place and the holy persons that minister in it, be trodden under foot by the oppressor?" Note, Angels are concerned for the prosperity of the church on earth and desirous to see an end of its desolations. The angels asked, for the satisfaction of Daniel, not doubting but he was desirous to know, how long these calamities should last? The question takes it for granted that they should not last always. The rod of the wicked shall not rest upon the lot of the righteous, though it may come upon their lot. Christ comforted himself in his sufferings with this, The things concerning me have an end (Luk 22:37), and so may the church in hers. But it is desirable to know how long they shall last, that we may provide accordingly.
(2.)The answer given to this question, Dan 8:14. Christ gives instruction to the holy angels, for they are our fellow-servants; but here the answer was given to Daniel, because for his sake the question was asked: He said unto me. God sometimes gives in great favours to his people, in answer to the enquiries and requests of their friends for them. Now,
[1.]Christ assures him that the trouble shall end; it shall continue 2300 days and no longer, so many evenings and mornings (so the word is), so many nuchthēmerai, so many natural days, reckoned, as in the beginning of Genesis, by the evenings and mornings, because it was the evening and the morning sacrifice that they most lamented the loss of, and thought the time passed very slowly while they were deprived of them. Some make the morning and the evening, in this number, to stand for two, and then 2300 evenings and as many mornings will make but 1150 days; and about so many days it was that the daily sacrifice was interrupted: and this comes nearer to the computation (Dan 7:25) of a time, times, and the dividing of a time. But it is less forced to understand them of so many natural days; 2300 days make six years and three months, and about eighteen days; and just so long they reckon from the defection of the people, procured by Menelaus the high priest in the 142nd year of the kingdom of the Seleucidae, the sixth month of that year, and the 6th day of the month (so Josephus dates it), to the cleansing of the sanctuary, and the reestablishment of religion among them, which was in the 148th year, the 9th month, and the 25th day of the month, 1 Macc. 4:52. God reckons the time of his people's afflictions he is afflicted. Rev 2:10, Thou shalt have tribulation ten days.
[2.]He assures him that they shall see better days afterwards: Then shall the sanctuary be cleansed. Note, The cleansing of the sanctuary is a happy token for good to any people; when they begin to be reformed they will soon be relieved. Though the righteous God may, for the correction of his people, suffer his sanctuary to be profaned for a while, yet the jealous God will, for his own glory, see to the cleansing of it in due time. Christ died to cleanse his church, and he will so cleanse it as at length to present it blameless to himself.
Historical interpretation
Four Centuries of Reception
3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Verse 13. "And I heard one of the saints speaking, and one saint said to another saint (I do not know which one), who was conversing with him." Instead of "another one which one I do not know" - the rendering of Symmachus (tini pote) which I too have followed - Aquila and Theodotion, and the Septuagint as well, have simply put the Hebrew word (p-l-m-n-y) phelmoni itself. Without specifying the angel's name, I should say that the author indicated some one of the angels or other in a general way.
"'How long shall be the vision concerning the continual sacrifice and the sin of the desolation that is made, and the sanctuary and the strength be trodden under foot?'" One angel asks another angel for how long a period the Temple is by the judgment of God to be desolated under the rule of Antiochus, King of Syria, and how long the image of Jupiter is to stand in God's Temple (according to his additional statement: "...and the sanctuary and the strength be trodden under foot?").
The word phelmouni means “a person” in Greek; Syriac, which is close to Hebrew, also confirms this. So blessed Daniel is saying, I heard one holy one asking another holy one. Clearly he is witnessing angels conversing and wanting to learn how long is the period of the offenses of impiety and lawlessness, the devastation of the temple, the illicit and loathsome sacrifice and the oppression of the people.
Plūmni: interior. This name is given to the angel on the basis of his actions and the place that he occupies; it indicates the one who is in the inside and close to the Judge and who knows the secrets and the events that are about to happen. It is a Hebrew term.
Continue studying Daniel 8:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Daniel 8:13 captures a pivotal moment within Daniel's vision, as two angelic beings engage in a profound dialogue concerning the duration of a period of intense tribulation. One "saint" asks another how long the vision pertaining to the cessation of the daily sacrifice, the "transgression of desolation," and the subsequent trampling of both the sanctuary and God's people will endure. This urgent inquiry encapsulates a deep heavenly concern over the desecration of sacred space and the severe suffering inflicted upon the covenant community, highlighting a divinely appointed limit to such profound oppression and a yearning for its pre-ordained end.
Context
Literary Context
Daniel 8:13 is situated within the second major vision of the book of Daniel, following the vision of the four beasts in Daniel 7. Chapter 8 presents a symbolic vision of a ram with two horns, representing the Medo-Persian Empire, and a male goat with a prominent horn, symbolizing the Greek Empire under Alexander the Great. This goat's horn is broken, and four notable horns emerge, followed by the rise of a "little horn" from one of them (Daniel 8:9). This "little horn" is depicted as growing exceedingly great, even challenging the "host of heaven," casting down some of the stars, and magnifying itself against the Prince of the host. Crucially, it takes away the "daily sacrifice" and casts down the place of the sanctuary, leading to the "transgression of desolation" (Daniel 8:11-12). Verse 13 then serves as a direct, urgent inquiry from one angelic being to another, seeking clarification on the duration of this described desolation, indicating that the vision's immediate impact and future implications are of great concern in the heavenly realm, setting the stage for the revelation of God's precise timing.
Historical & Cultural Context
The "little horn" of Daniel 8 is widely interpreted by scholars as Antiochus IV Epiphanes, a Seleucid king who reigned from 175-164 BC. Historically, Antiochus launched a brutal persecution against the Jews, attempting to Hellenize them by force. In 167 BC, he notoriously desecrated the Jerusalem Temple, halting the regular "daily sacrifice" (tamid) and erecting an altar to Zeus (or a pagan idol) within the Temple precincts. This act is known as the "abomination of desolation." The "sanctuary" refers to the Jerusalem Temple, the spiritual heart of Jewish worship and national identity, where God's presence was believed to dwell. The "host" (Hebrew: tsaba) in this context most likely refers to the "army" or "people" of God, the Jewish community, who were subjected to severe oppression, torture, and death under Antiochus's tyrannical rule. The question "How long?" reflects the deep anguish and theological crisis faced by a people whose central place of worship was defiled and whose very existence was threatened, a situation that profoundly challenged their understanding of God's covenant faithfulness and provoked a desperate longing for divine intervention.
Key Themes
Daniel 8:13 contributes significantly to several key themes within the book of Daniel and biblical prophecy. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Divine Sovereignty over history, demonstrating that even the most tyrannical earthly powers operate within a divinely ordained timeline. The fact that angelic beings are discussing the duration implies a pre-determined end to the tribulation, assuring that God is in control. Secondly, it highlights the Nature of Evil and Transgression, specifically the audacious sin of desecrating sacred space and persecuting God's people. The "transgression of desolation" points to an act of rebellion that brings about utter spiritual and physical ruin, a profound affront to God's holiness. Thirdly, the verse expresses the Suffering of God's People and their longing for deliverance, a recurring motif in apocalyptic literature. The "how long" lament resonates throughout the Psalms (Psalm 13:1) and prophetic books, reflecting a universal cry for justice and restoration. Finally, Daniel 8:13 sets the stage for the revelation of Divine Timing in Daniel 8:14, where the precise duration of the desolation is revealed, offering a glimmer of hope amidst the despair and reinforcing the certainty of God's ultimate vindication and restoration of His people and His sanctuary.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term, derived from a root meaning "to be sacred," refers to holy ones. In this context, it specifically denotes angelic beings, emphasizing their sacred nature, divine appointment, and proximity to God's presence. Their involvement in this conversation underscores the heavenly concern and awareness regarding earthly events, particularly those affecting God's people and His sanctuary.
From the root meaning "to see," châzôwn signifies a sight (mentally), i.e., a dream, revelation, or oracle. Here, it refers to the entire prophetic revelation Daniel received in Chapter 8, encompassing the symbolic beasts and the actions of the "little horn." The question "How long shall be the vision?" thus inquires about the duration of the events depicted in the vision, highlighting their future, unfolding nature and the period of suffering they represent.
This word denotes a revolt, rebellion, sin, or trespass. It implies a deliberate act of defiance against God or His covenant. When paired with "desolation," as in "transgression of desolation," it describes a specific, egregious act of rebellion that results in utter ruin, devastation, and spiritual barrenness, particularly in relation to the defilement of the sanctuary and the cessation of proper worship.
Verse Breakdown
"Then I heard one saint speaking, and another saint said unto that certain [saint] which spake,"
This opening clause establishes the scene as a divine colloquy. Daniel, the recipient of the vision, overhears a conversation between two angelic beings. The use of "saint" (qâdôwsh) for these heavenly figures emphasizes their holy nature and their role as messengers or participants in divine counsel. The phrase "that certain [saint]" (palmôwnîy) implies a specific, though unnamed, individual, adding a sense of authenticity and directness to the overheard dialogue and highlighting the profound importance of the subject matter.
"How long [shall be] the vision [concerning] the daily [sacrifice],"
This is the core question, expressing an urgent plea for understanding the duration of the suffering and desolation. "How long" is a common lament in biblical literature, signifying a period of prolonged distress and a yearning for divine intervention and the restoration of justice. The "daily sacrifice" (tâmîyd) refers to the regular, prescribed burnt offerings in the Jerusalem Temple, which were central to Israelite worship and atonement. Its cessation signifies a profound disruption of covenant worship and a spiritual crisis for the people of God.
"and the transgression of desolation,"
This phrase specifies the nature of the crisis. The "transgression" (peshaʻ) is an act of rebellion or apostasy, while "desolation" (shâmêm) implies utter ruin or devastation. Together, "the transgression of desolation" refers to the specific sacrilegious act that causes the Temple's defilement and the subsequent spiritual and physical ruin, historically linked to Antiochus IV Epiphanes' actions. It is an act so egregious it brings about utter devastation.
"to give both the sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot?"
This final clause describes the consequences of the transgression. "To give" (nâthan) here means to hand over or allow. The "sanctuary" (qôdesh) is the holy Temple, the sacred dwelling place of God, and the "host" (tsâbâʼ) refers to God's people, the Jewish community, who are likened to an army or multitude. "Trodden under foot" (mirmâç) is a powerful metaphor for extreme subjugation, disrespect, and humiliation, signifying conquest, oppression, and defilement. The question thus asks about the total duration of this period of sacrilege, intense oppression, and profound suffering for both God's holy place and His chosen people.
Literary Devices
Daniel 8:13 employs several potent literary devices that amplify its theological and emotional impact. The primary device is Dialogue, as the verse presents a direct conversation between two angelic beings. This allows for the urgent question "How long?" to be posed, reflecting not only Daniel's unstated concern but also the deep concern within the heavenly realm regarding the unfolding events. This dialogue also serves to build Suspense, as the answer to this critical question is withheld until the subsequent verse (Daniel 8:14), compelling the reader to anticipate the divine revelation. While not explicitly in verse 13, the terms "daily sacrifice," "sanctuary," and "host" are laden with rich Symbolism, representing the core of Israelite worship, their sacred space, and their identity as God's covenant people. The phrase "trodden under foot" is a vivid Metaphor for extreme oppression, humiliation, and desecration, commonly used in prophetic literature to describe the subjugation of a conquered people or a defiled holy place. Finally, the entire verse functions as a Rhetorical Question that underscores the magnitude of the suffering and the longing for divine intervention, setting up the subsequent divine revelation of the precise timeline for the end of the desolation.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Daniel 8:13 stands as a profound theological statement, affirming that even in the darkest hours of human history, God's heavenly court is fully aware and deeply concerned with the suffering of His people and the desecration of His holy name and dwelling place. The "how long" question echoes the cries of the righteous throughout scripture who yearn for divine justice and the end of oppression, demonstrating that suffering is not limitless but operates within a divinely appointed timeframe. This verse highlights the enduring conflict between good and evil, particularly the audacious nature of sin that seeks to defile what is sacred and oppress God's chosen. It also foreshadows a pattern of "abomination of desolation" that recurs in biblical prophecy, pointing to ultimate end-time events. The question implicitly trusts in God's ultimate sovereignty and His commitment to restore justice and purity, even when the means and timing are initially hidden, thereby offering a foundational hope amidst despair.
Reflection and Application
Daniel 8:13 offers profound spiritual nourishment for believers navigating times of distress and uncertainty. The angelic "how long" resonates with our own questions when we witness injustice, spiritual decline, or personal hardship that seems to stretch endlessly. This verse reminds us that our struggles are not unnoticed in the heavenly realms; indeed, the very angels of God are concerned with the duration of suffering and the desecration of truth and holiness. It calls us to cultivate a steadfast hope, knowing that even the most formidable evil has a divinely appointed limit. We are encouraged to persevere in faith, even when the "sanctuary" of our spiritual lives or the "host" of the church seems to be "trodden under foot" by worldly pressures or spiritual attacks. Just as an answer was given to Daniel, we can trust that God has a timeline for all things, and His ultimate plan for redemption and restoration will prevail. Our role is to remain faithful, to pray for justice, and to stand firm against any "transgression of desolation" that seeks to defile what is holy or oppress the people of God, always remembering that God's ultimate victory is assured.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Who are the "saints" mentioned in Daniel 8:13?
In this context, the "saints" (Hebrew: qâdôwsh) refer to holy ones, specifically angelic beings. The book of Daniel frequently depicts angelic interaction and revelation, and these "saints" are part of the heavenly host, privy to God's divine plans and actively involved in the unfolding of prophetic events. Their conversation underscores the divine awareness and concern regarding the earthly events described in the vision, particularly those affecting God's people and His holy sanctuary.
What is the "transgression of desolation" and its significance?
The "transgression of desolation" (Hebrew: peshaʻ shâmêm) refers to a specific, egregious act of rebellion or sin that results in utter ruin, devastation, and spiritual barrenness. In the immediate historical context of Daniel 8, it primarily points to the actions of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, who desecrated the Jerusalem Temple by halting the daily sacrifices and erecting a pagan idol or altar within its sacred precincts in 167 BC. This act was a profound spiritual and physical defilement, causing immense suffering and marking a period of intense oppression for the Jewish people. Theologically, it represents the ultimate affront to God's holiness and covenant. This event also serves as a prophetic type, foreshadowing future "abominations of desolation" mentioned by Jesus in Matthew 24:15 and by Paul in 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4, pointing to climactic end-time events that will precede the return of Christ.
Does Daniel 8:13 have any relevance beyond its historical fulfillment in Antiochus Epiphanes?
Absolutely. While Daniel 8 has a clear historical fulfillment in Antiochus IV Epiphanes, biblical prophecy often operates on multiple levels of fulfillment. Many scholars view Antiochus as a "type" or foreshadowing of a greater, future "abomination of desolation" that will occur at the end of the age. Jesus Himself references the "abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel the prophet" in Matthew 24:15, connecting it to events preceding His second coming. This suggests that the themes of desecration, the cessation of true worship, the persecution of God's people, and a divinely appointed limit to evil are enduring prophetic patterns that will culminate in a final, climactic fulfillment before Christ's return. Thus, Daniel 8:13 serves as a warning, a source of hope, and a call to vigilance for all generations, reminding us that God's ultimate plan will prevail.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Daniel 8:13, with its anguished question concerning the duration of desecration and suffering, finds its ultimate answer and profound fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The "daily sacrifice" that was halted and defiled pointed forward to the true and final sacrifice—Jesus Himself—whose perfect, once-for-all offering on the cross forever superseded the need for animal sacrifices (Hebrews 10:10-14). His body became the ultimate "sanctuary," which was indeed "trodden under foot" through His crucifixion and death, yet raised in three days, demonstrating His decisive victory over sin and death (John 2:19-21). The "transgression of desolation" represents the epitome of human rebellion and evil; Christ, through His atoning work, conquered this very transgression, disarming the powers of darkness that seek to desolate humanity and God's creation (Colossians 2:15). Furthermore, the "host" being trodden under foot finds its ultimate reversal in Christ's establishment of His Church, His new "host," which, though it experiences persecution, is ultimately triumphant through Him, as the gates of Hades will not prevail against it (Matthew 16:18). The "how long" lament is answered by the certainty of Christ's return, when all desolation will cease, and He will establish His eternal kingdom where there will be no need for a physical temple, for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple (Revelation 21:22). Thus, Daniel 8:13, though rooted in historical oppression, powerfully foreshadows the redemptive work of Christ, who is the end of all desolation and the source of eternal restoration and true worship.