TRV
- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
See on the biblical-era map
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 2 Kings 23:25–30. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Upon the reading of these verses we must say, Lord, though thy righteousness be as the great mountains - evident, conspicuous, and past dispute, yet thy judgments are a great deep, unfathomable and past finding out, Psa 36:6. What shall we say to this?
I.It is here owned that Josiah was one of the best kings that ever sat upon the throne of David, Kg2 23:25.
As Hezekiah was a non-such for faith and dependence upon God in straits (Kg2 18:5), so Josiah was a non-such for sincerity and zeal in carrying on a work of reformation. For this there was none like him,
1.That he turned to the Lord from whom his fathers had revolted. It is true religion to turn to God as one we have chosen and love. He did what he could to turn his kingdom also to the Lord.
2.That he did this with his heart and soul; his affections and aims were right in what he did. Those make nothing of their religion that do not make heart-work of it.
3.That he did it with all his heart, and all his soul, and all his might - with vigour, and courage, and resolution: he could not otherwise have broken through the difficulties he had to grapple with. What great things may we bring to pass in the service of God if we be but lively and hearty in it!
4.That he did this according to all the law of Moses, in an exact observance of that law and with an actual regard to it. His zeal did not transport him into any irregularities, but, in all he did, he walked by rule.
II.Notwithstanding this he was cut off by a violent death in the midst of his days, and his kingdom was ruined within a few years after.
Consequent upon such a reformation as this, one would have expected nothing but the prosperity and glory both of king and kingdom; but, quite contrary, we find both under a cloud.
1.Even the reformed kingdom continues marked for ruin. For all this (Kg2 23:26) the Lord turned not from the fierceness of his great wrath. That is certainly true, which God spoke by the prophet (Jer 18:7, Jer 18:8), that if a nation, doomed to destruction, turn from the evil of sin, God will repent of the evil of punishment; and therefore we must conclude that Josiah's people, though they submitted to Josiah's power, did not heartily imbibe Josiah's principles. They were turned by force, and did not voluntarily turn from their evil way, but still continued their affection for their idols; and therefore he that knows men's hearts would not recall the sentence, which was, That Judah should be removed, as Israel had been, and Jerusalem itself cast off, Kg2 23:27. Yet even this destruction was intended to be their effectual reformation; so that we must say, not only that the criminals had filled their measure and were ripe for ruin, but also that the disease had come to a crisis, and was ready for a cure; and this shall be all the fruit, even the taking away of sin.
2.As an evidence of this, even the reforming king is cut off in the midst of his usefulness - in mercy to him, that he might not see the evil which was coming upon his kingdom, but in wrath to his people, for his death was an inlet to their desolations. The king of Egypt waged war, it seems, with the king of Assyria: so the king of Babylon is now called. Josiah's kingdom lay between them. He therefore thought himself concerned to oppose the king of Egypt, and check the growing, threatening, greatness of his power; for though, at this time, he protested that he had no design against Josiah, yet, if he should prevail to unite the river of Egypt and the river Euphrates, the land of Judah would soon be overflowed between them. Therefore Josiah went against him, and was killed in the first engagement, Kg2 23:29, Kg2 23:30. Here,
(1.)We cannot justify Josiah's conduct. He had no clear call to engage in this war, nor do we find that he asked counsel of God by urim or prophets concerning it. What had he to do to appear and act as a friend and ally to the king of Assyria? Should he help the ungodly and love those that hate the Lord? If the kings of Egypt and Assyria quarrelled, he had reason to think God would bring good out of it to him and his people, by making them instrumental to weaken one another. Some understand the promise made to him that he should come to his grave in peace in a sense in which it was not performed because, by his miscarriage in this matter, he forfeited the benefit of it. God has promised to keep us in all our ways; but, if we go out of our way, we throw ourselves out of his protection. I understand the promise so as that I believe it was fulfilled, for he died in peace with God and his own conscience, and saw not, nor had any immediate prospect of, the destruction of Judah and Jerusalem by the Chaldeans; yet I understand the providence to be a rebuke to him for his rashness.
(2.)We must adore God's righteousness in taking away such a jewel from an unthankful people that knew not how to value it. They greatly lamented his death (Ch2 35:25), urged to it by Jeremiah, who told them the meaning of it, and what a threatening omen it was; but they had not made a due improvement of the mercies they enjoyed by his life, of which God taught them the worth by the want.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
Nobody must think that anything was detracted to the celerity of death because of one’s merits. Enoch was kidnapped, lest malice might spoil his heart, and Josiah, who celebrated the Passover of the Lord in the eighteenth year of his reign in such a manner that he overcame in piousness all the previous kings, did not survive longer through the merits of his faith. No, rather, because grievous destruction threatened the Jewish people, the just king was taken away beforehand. I fear that you, too, were snatched away from us because of some offense on our part, so that, as a just person, you might escape in the eighteenth year of your reign the bitterness of impending evil.
Continue studying 2 Kings 23:27 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
The Lord's declaration in 2 Kings 23:27 serves as a profound and somber divine verdict against the Southern Kingdom of Judah. Despite King Josiah's extensive and genuine religious reforms, God unequivocally states His decision to remove Judah from His presence, mirroring the earlier exile of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. This decree extends to the rejection of Jerusalem, the city He had specifically chosen, and the Temple, the sacred house where His name was said to reside, underscoring the severe and irreversible consequences of generations of deep-seated national apostasy, idolatry, and covenant unfaithfulness.
Context
Literary Context
This pronouncement from the LORD arrives as a climactic and devastating statement following the detailed account of King Josiah's sweeping spiritual revival and reforms, meticulously recorded in 2 Kings 22 and 2 Kings 23. Josiah's zealous efforts led to the thorough purging of idolatry throughout Judah and Jerusalem, including the destruction of pagan altars, the defilement of high places, and the re-establishment of the Passover celebration. However, the preceding verse, 2 Kings 23:26, explicitly states that despite Josiah's righteous endeavors, the LORD did not turn from the fierceness of His great wrath, which had been kindled against Judah primarily because of the egregious provocations of King Manasseh. Thus, 2 Kings 23:27 functions as the divine, unyielding verdict, confirming that even the most righteous king's personal piety and national reforms could not fully avert the collective consequences of generations of systemic sin and deep-rooted apostasy, thereby setting the inexorable stage for the impending Babylonian exile.
Historical & Cultural Context
King Josiah's reign (640-609 BC) was situated historically after the exceptionally long and wicked reign of his grandfather, Manasseh (697-642 BC). Manasseh had not only reintroduced widespread idolatry—including Baal worship, Asherah poles, astral worship, and even the horrific practice of child sacrifice—but had also desecrated the very precincts of the Temple in Jerusalem with these abominations (2 Kings 21:1-9). Consequently, Judah had become deeply and pervasively entrenched in these pagan practices. Culturally, Jerusalem and its magnificent Temple were considered the absolute center of Israelite identity, worship, and national security. There was a widespread, albeit false, belief that Jerusalem and the Temple were inviolable due to God's specific choice and promises, as articulated in Solomon's dedication prayer (1 Kings 8:29). The declaration in 2 Kings 23:27 shatters this dangerous presumption, powerfully demonstrating that God's presence and favor were always conditional upon covenant faithfulness, not merely on the existence of a sacred city or an impressive building. The broader historical backdrop also includes the significant decline of the once-dominant Assyrian Empire and the formidable rise of Babylon, which would soon emerge as God's chosen instrument of judgment against Judah.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully articulates several crucial and interconnected theological themes. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Divine Judgment and the Inevitable Consequences of Sin, illustrating with stark clarity that God's patience, while vast, has definitive limits, and that persistent, unrepentant disobedience—particularly in the forms of idolatry and covenant unfaithfulness—inevitably leads to severe and national-level consequences. Secondly, it highlights God's Absolute Holiness and Uncompromising Justice, demonstrating that His immutable character cannot tolerate unrepentant sin and that His justice demands that profound covenant violations be met with appropriate judgment, thereby affirming His consistency in both blessing and curse, as outlined in the Mosaic Covenant (Deuteronomy 28:15-68). Thirdly, the explicit mention of "this city Jerusalem which I have chosen" and "the house of which I said, My name shall be there" emphasizes The Fall of Jerusalem and the Temple, signaling not a permanent abandonment, but a temporary withdrawal of God's manifest presence from these central symbols of His covenant relationship due to their profound defilement by the people's sins. This serves as a stark reminder that physical structures or past divine favor do not grant immunity from divine wrath. Finally, the poignant phrase "as I have removed Israel" draws a clear and ominous Parallel to Israel's Exile, indicating that Judah, despite its unique covenant status, would suffer a similar national catastrophe to the Northern Kingdom, which had been exiled by Assyria over a century earlier due to their own idolatry and unfaithfulness (2 Kings 17:23).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb (H5493) signifies a definitive turning off, a departure, or a forceful removal. In this context, it conveys God's intentional and decisive act to displace Judah from its privileged position within His sight and protection. It implies a complete cessation of His visible presence and blessing among them in their land, leading to their expulsion.
The verb (H3988) means to spurn, abhor, despise, or reject. It emphasizes a complete and decisive withdrawal of God's protective hand and a severing of the relationship, at least for a period. This is not a temporary turning away but a profound act of abandonment due to severe and persistent unfaithfulness, particularly poignant when applied to the chosen city and the Temple, which were meant to be the locus of His presence.
This verb (H977) denotes God's sovereign act of selection or election, indicating something or someone specifically picked out for a purpose. The profound irony and tragedy of God "casting off" what He Himself had "chosen" highlights the conditional nature of His covenant relationship and the severity of Judah's apostasy. It underscores that divine election does not preclude divine judgment when covenant responsibilities are continually violated.
Verse Breakdown
"And the LORD said, I will remove Judah also out of my sight"
This opening clause establishes the divine origin and authoritative nature of the pronouncement, emphasizing that this is a direct word from Yahweh (H3068, Yᵉhôvâh'). "Out of my sight" (H6440, pânîym') is an anthropomorphism, indicating a profound withdrawal of God's favor, intimate presence, and protective oversight from the Southern Kingdom of Judah (H3063, Yᵉhûwdâh'). It signifies a spiritual and physical expulsion from the land God had given them.
"as I have removed Israel"
This phrase draws a direct and ominous parallel to the fate of the Northern Kingdom of Israel (H3478, Yisrâʼêl'), which had been exiled by the Assyrians in 722 BC due to their pervasive idolatry and covenant unfaithfulness. It serves as a stark warning and a confirmation that Judah's persistent sin would lead to a similar, though distinct, national catastrophe, demonstrating God's consistent justice across both kingdoms.
"and will cast off this city Jerusalem which I have chosen"
This is a particularly devastating declaration. Jerusalem (H3389, Yᵉrûwshâlaim'), the capital and spiritual heart of Judah, was the city God had specifically chosen (H977, bâchar') to place His name. To "cast off" (H3988, mâʼaç') Jerusalem implies a rejection of its status as a holy city and a withdrawal of God's special protection, making it vulnerable to destruction and desecration.
"and the house of which I said, My name shall be there"
This refers to the Temple (H1004, bayith'), built by Solomon, which was considered the dwelling place of God's manifest presence on earth and where His "name" (H8034, shêm') was said to reside. The declaration that God would "cast off" this house signifies a temporary abandonment of His dwelling place due to its defilement by the people's idolatry and sin, culminating in its destruction and the cessation of sacrificial worship, a profound act of divine judgment.
Literary Devices
The verse employs several powerful literary devices to convey its message with profound impact. Parallelism is strikingly evident in the phrase "I will remove Judah also out of my sight, as I have removed Israel," which starkly compares Judah's impending fate to that of the Northern Kingdom. This comparison emphasizes the consistency of God's judgment against covenant unfaithfulness and underscores that Judah's special status did not grant immunity from the consequences of sin. Anthropomorphism is utilized with the phrase "out of my sight," attributing human-like vision and a sense of profound withdrawal to God, making His rejection more relatable and impactful to the human audience. There is a deep and tragic irony in God "casting off" the very city He had "chosen" and the "house of which I said, My name shall be there." These were the preeminent symbols of His special favor, presence, and covenant relationship, now paradoxically subject to His wrath due to the people's persistent and egregious actions. The entire verse functions as a divine fiat or decree, characterized by the authoritative and declarative "I will," which underscores God's absolute sovereignty and the unchangeable, irreversible nature of His judgment once it has been pronounced.
Theological and Thematic Connections
This verse profoundly illustrates the principle of divine justice and the ultimate consequences of covenant unfaithfulness. Despite God's enduring patience and His specific, sovereign choice of Judah, Jerusalem, and the Temple as the locus of His presence, persistent and pervasive sin, especially idolatry, ultimately provokes His righteous wrath. It teaches that God's promises, while rooted in His faithfulness, are often conditional upon human obedience and that even a history of profound divine favor does not grant immunity from judgment when His holiness is continually affronted. The "removal" of Judah, Jerusalem, and the Temple from God's "sight" signifies a temporary, yet severe, withdrawal of His manifest presence and protection, leading to the discipline of exile. This judgment, though devastating, is not an act of arbitrary cruelty but a just and necessary response to generations of rebellion, designed to purify a people who had strayed far from His covenant ways and to uphold the integrity of His holy character.
Reflection and Application
2 Kings 23:27 serves as a powerful and profoundly sobering reminder that God's justice is unwavering and that His absolute holiness demands accountability from His people. While God is indeed infinitely merciful, gracious, and slow to anger, He is also perfectly righteous and just, and His patience has definitive limits. For believers today, this verse emphasizes the critical importance of genuine, heart-level repentance and consistent, wholehearted obedience, rather than merely outward religious observance, superficial reforms, or a reliance on inherited spiritual status. It teaches us that presuming upon God's grace, past blessings, or a "chosen" identity without true, ongoing faithfulness and a turning from sin is a perilous and ultimately destructive path. Our faith must be lived out in active, daily devotion and obedience, recognizing that God's presence is not tied to physical structures, historical traditions, or inherited privilege, but to a people who truly seek Him in spirit and truth. This passage challenges us to deeply examine our own lives and our faith communities for any areas of compromise, spiritual apathy, or subtle idolatry, urging us to pursue holiness and wholehearted devotion to the Lord, lest we, too, experience the painful consequences of spiritual drift and unfaithfulness.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did God still judge Judah despite Josiah's reforms?
Josiah's reforms were indeed sweeping and genuine, representing a significant return to the Law of the Lord and a remarkable effort to purge idolatry from the land. However, the judgment pronounced in 2 Kings 23:27 was not primarily a response to Josiah's personal piety or his reforms, but rather to the deep-seated, systemic apostasy that had permeated Judah for generations, particularly under the prolonged and exceedingly wicked reign of King Manasseh. 2 Kings 23:26 explicitly states that the LORD did not turn from the fierceness of His great wrath because of all the provocations of Manasseh. The people's hearts, by and large, had not genuinely turned back to God; their participation in the reforms was often superficial or forced by the king, not a deep, national spiritual conviction. Thus, while Josiah's righteous efforts delayed the inevitable judgment, they could not fully avert the consequences for a nation whose heart was hardened and whose cup of iniquity was full.
Does this mean God abandoned His people or His promises forever?
No, this declaration of judgment and removal was a severe, yet temporary, act of divine discipline, not a permanent abandonment of God's eternal covenant promises to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and David. While Judah was indeed exiled to Babylon, God always intended for a remnant to return and for His overarching redemptive plan to continue. Prophets like Jeremiah spoke of a future restoration after seventy years (Jeremiah 29:10-14), and the exile itself served as a crucible designed to purge the nation of its deep-seated idolatry and prepare it for a renewed, more faithful relationship with God. God's ultimate faithfulness to His covenant is powerfully seen in His preservation of a faithful remnant, the eventual return from exile, and, most supremely, in the coming of the Messiah, Jesus Christ, through whom all His promises find their definitive "Yes" and "Amen" (2 Corinthians 1:20).
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The profound judgment pronounced in 2 Kings 23:27—the casting off of Jerusalem and the Temple, once the chosen locus of God's name—finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in the monumental transition from the old covenant to the new. The physical Temple, with its sacrificial system, was always a shadow, pointing forward to the true and ultimate dwelling place of God. Jesus Christ Himself is the ultimate Temple, the very embodiment of God's presence among humanity (John 2:19-21). His crucifixion, which occurred outside the gates of Jerusalem, and His glorious resurrection, marked the definitive end of the old sacrificial system and rendered the physical Temple ultimately obsolete as the primary locus of God's presence. The subsequent destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in AD 70, precisely as prophesied by Jesus Himself (Matthew 24:1-2), powerfully echoed the earlier judgment on Judah, demonstrating that God's presence is no longer confined to a building made with hands or a specific geographical city, but is now universally accessible to all who believe, through Christ. Through His perfect, atoning sacrifice, Jesus takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), providing the ultimate and complete solution for the very idolatry and unfaithfulness that led to Judah's devastating exile. Moreover, in the new covenant, God's Holy Spirit indwells every believer, making them living temples (1 Corinthians 6:19), thereby fulfilling the ancient promise that God's name would be there, not in a physical structure, but in the hearts and lives of His redeemed people, forming a spiritual house for His glory (1 Peter 2:5).