Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the rest of the acts of Azariah, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the rest H3499 of the acts H1697 of Azariah H5838, and all that he did H6213, are they not written H3789 in the book H5612 of the chronicles H1697 H3117 of the kings H4428 of Judah H3063?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Other activities of 'Azaryah and all his accomplishments are recorded in the Annals of the Kings of Y'hudah.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
As for the rest of the acts of Azariah, along with all his accomplishments, are they not written in the Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah?
Ask
American Standard Version
Now the rest of the acts of Azariah, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Now the rest of the acts of Azariah, and all that he did, aren’t they written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah?
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Concerning the rest of the actes of Azariah, and all that he did, are they not written in the booke of the Chronicles of the Kings of Iudah?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And the rest of the matters of Azariah, and all that he did, are they not written on the book of the Chronicles of the kings of Judah?
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 9,932 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Second Kings 15:6 functions as a standard historiographical formula, concluding the biblical account of King Azariah's (Uzziah's) lengthy and impactful reign over Judah. This verse directs the reader to external, non-biblical royal annals for a more exhaustive record of his deeds, thereby highlighting the selective, theologically purposeful nature of the biblical narrative, which prioritizes divine judgment, covenant faithfulness, and God's sovereign hand in history over comprehensive chronological detail.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse immediately follows the summary of King Azariah's (also known as Uzziah) extensive 52-year reign over Judah, specifically noting his affliction with leprosy until his death, which forced him to live in a separate house while his son Jotham governed the palace 2 Kings 15:5. This divine judgment, detailed more fully in 2 Chronicles 26:16-21, was a direct consequence of his prideful attempt to burn incense in the Temple, a sacred duty reserved exclusively for the Aaronic priests. Therefore, 2 Kings 15:6 serves as a conventional concluding formula, a recurring literary device throughout the Books of Kings, signaling the end of the inspired author's focused narrative on Azariah and directing the audience to external, non-canonical historical records for further details of his extensive rule. It effectively transitions the narrative to the subsequent account of his son and successor, Jotham.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: King Azariah (Uzziah) reigned over the southern Kingdom of Judah during the mid-8th century BCE, a period characterized by significant economic prosperity, military strength, and complex geopolitical interactions with rising regional powers, particularly the Assyrian Empire. In the ancient Near East, it was a widespread and established cultural practice for monarchies to meticulously maintain official state annals or royal chronicles. These records served as comprehensive historical archives, documenting the deeds, military campaigns, building projects, and significant events of their kings' reigns. The phrase "the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah" in this verse refers precisely to these non-biblical, official court records, which were distinct from the inspired biblical texts. Furthermore, the mention of Azariah's leprosy in 2 Kings 15:5 underscores the severe social, religious, and political implications of this disease in ancient Israel, leading to ritual impurity, social isolation, and exclusion from public life, as prescribed by Mosaic Law (e.g., Leviticus 13).
  • Key Themes: This verse encapsulates several core themes prevalent throughout the Books of Kings. Firstly, it exemplifies the historiographical formula consistently employed by the biblical author, which summarizes a king's reign and points to external sources for a fuller account. This formula underscores that the biblical narrative is not an exhaustive historical record but a theologically driven one, selectively presenting events to convey spiritual lessons, highlight covenant faithfulness or disobedience, and demonstrate God's sovereign interaction with His people. Secondly, the reference to these external chronicles subtly hints at divine record-keeping beyond Scripture itself, suggesting God's overarching interest and oversight in the full sweep of human history, even if only select portions are included in His inspired Word for specific redemptive purposes. Finally, by acknowledging "the rest of the acts of Azariah," the verse hints at Azariah's complex legacy, a reign that, despite its initial prosperity and military success (as seen in 2 Chronicles 26), ultimately concluded with divine judgment due to his pride and transgression, as detailed in 2 Kings 15:5).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • rest (Hebrew, yether', H3499): Properly, an overhanging, i.e. (by implication) an excess, superiority, remainder; also a small rope (as hanging free). In this context, it refers to the remaining or unrecorded portion of Azariah's reign, emphasizing that the biblical narrative provides only a summary.
  • acts (Hebrew, dâbâr', H1697): A word; by implication, a matter (as spoken of) or thing; adverbially, a cause. Here, it signifies the totality of a king's public life, encompassing his policies, military campaigns, building projects, and significant events. It implies a detailed record of his administration and impact, extending beyond simple actions.
  • written (Hebrew, kâthab', H3789): A primitive root; to grave, by implication, to write (describe, inscribe, prescribe, subscribe). This term confirms the existence of formal, inscribed records, indicating that the comprehensive details of Azariah's reign were indeed documented in official, authoritative archives.
  • book (Hebrew, çêpher', H5612): Properly, writing (the art or a document); by implication, a book. This refers to a formal, compiled written document, typically a scroll in ancient times, confirming the existence of extensive, authoritative historical archives maintained by the Judahite monarchy.
  • chronicles (Hebrew, yôwm', H3117): From an unused root meaning to be hot; a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term). In the phrase "book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah," "chronicles" translates "the days," referring to a historical record or annals, a recounting of events as they unfolded day by day or year by year. It specifically points to the official, continuous record maintained by the royal scribes.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the rest of the acts of Azariah": This introductory phrase serves as a transitional marker, indicating that the preceding narrative in 2 Kings has offered only a selective summary or highlights of King Azariah's reign. "The rest of the acts" explicitly implies that a vast array of other significant events, policies, and accomplishments from his rule are not detailed within the biblical text, pointing to a larger historical reality beyond the scope of the inspired narrative.
  • "and all that he did": This expansive phrase further underscores the comprehensive nature of Azariah's lengthy 52-year reign. It suggests that his activities were extensive and multifaceted, encompassing every aspect of his rule, both positive and negative, which the biblical author chooses not to elaborate upon in this divinely curated account.
  • "[are] they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah?": This rhetorical question is a standard, declarative formula used consistently throughout the Books of Kings. It functions as an authoritative pointer to external, non-biblical historical records—the official state annals maintained by the Judahite monarchy. By posing it as a question, the author affirms the undeniable existence and accessibility of these comprehensive records, thereby validating the selective nature of the biblical account and reassuring the reader that a fuller historical picture was available elsewhere, even if not deemed essential for the theological purposes of Kings.

Literary Devices

The verse primarily employs Formulaic Language, a recurring literary device throughout the Books of Kings. This standardized concluding statement, repeated for nearly every monarch, provides structural consistency and signals the end of the biblical author's focused narrative on a particular king. It creates a sense of continuity and predictability for the reader. Furthermore, the phrase "[are] they not written..." functions as a Rhetorical Question, which, rather than seeking information, serves to affirm the undeniable existence and accessibility of the "book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah." This rhetorical device lends authority to the biblical text by implicitly stating that its account is not exhaustive but is supported by verifiable external records. Finally, the verse utilizes Ellipsis or Conciseness, implying a vast amount of unstated historical detail about Azariah's reign, thereby highlighting the selective nature of the biblical narrative, which prioritizes theological and spiritual lessons over comprehensive historical documentation.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This seemingly administrative verse carries significant theological weight, serving as a profound statement about the nature and purpose of biblical revelation. It underscores the distinct aim of the biblical narrative, particularly the Books of Kings: unlike a secular historical chronicle that strives for exhaustive detail, the Bible is a divinely inspired, theologically selective account. Its primary goal is not merely to record "all that he did" but to reveal God's character, His unwavering covenant faithfulness, the inevitable consequences of obedience and disobedience, and His sovereign hand in the rise and fall of nations and kings. The existence of external records, to which the biblical author points, paradoxically highlights the sufficiency of what God has chosen to reveal in Scripture for His redemptive purposes, while simultaneously affirming His omniscience and overarching knowledge of all human history.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

In an age saturated with information, 2 Kings 15:6 offers a profound lesson on the nature of truth and divine revelation. It reminds us that while human history is vast and complex, God, in His infinite wisdom, has chosen to reveal to us precisely what is necessary for our salvation, spiritual growth, and understanding of His redemptive plan. The Bible is not a mere textbook of facts but a living Word designed to transform hearts and minds. This verse encourages us to trust in the sufficiency of Scripture, recognizing that what God has chosen to include—and what He has chosen to omit, pointing to other records—is purposeful. It challenges us to look beyond superficial historical details to grasp the deeper theological truths and the overarching narrative of God's interaction with humanity, learning from the selective accounts of kings like Azariah about the enduring principles of obedience, judgment, and grace. It prompts us to ask not merely "What happened?" but "What is God revealing about Himself through what happened?"

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the Bible's selective approach to history, as exemplified by this verse, shape our understanding of its primary purpose and authority?
  • If "all that we did" is known to God and recorded in His divine ledger, even if not in Scripture, how does this truth impact our daily lives and choices?
  • What enduring lessons can we draw from Azariah's complex legacy, where prosperity was followed by divine judgment due to pride, even when only a summary is provided in the biblical narrative?

FAQ

Is "the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah" the same as the biblical books of 1 & 2 Chronicles?

Answer: No, they are distinct. The phrase "the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah" (or Israel), found consistently throughout the Books of Kings, refers to the official, non-biblical royal annals or state records meticulously maintained by the scribes of the Judahite monarchy. These were comprehensive historical archives of royal activities and national events. While the biblical books of 1 & 2 Chronicles, written much later (likely during or after the Babylonian exile), may have drawn upon such historical sources, they are theological works with a distinct purpose—to recount Israel's history from a priestly and Davidic perspective, emphasizing worship, the temple, and the Davidic covenant. The content, focus, and theological agenda of the inspired biblical Books of Chronicles differ significantly from the secular "book of the chronicles" referenced in Kings, which were primarily administrative historical documents.

Why does the Bible often refer to external sources instead of providing all the historical details itself?

Answer: The biblical authors, particularly of the Books of Kings, were not writing exhaustive historical encyclopedias but rather divinely inspired, theologically driven narratives. Their primary purpose was to interpret history through the lens of God's covenant with Israel, highlighting the consequences of obedience and disobedience, the nature of kingship under God's sovereignty, and the unfolding of His redemptive plan. By referring to external chronicles, the authors implicitly affirm the historical reality of the events while simultaneously signaling that their own account is selective and purposeful. They include only the details essential for conveying their spiritual and theological message, trusting that more comprehensive historical data was available in the official state records for those who sought it. This approach underscores the Bible's unique role as a revelation of God's truth and His redemptive plan, not merely a secular history book. It emphasizes that the Bible's authority comes from its divine inspiration and theological focus, rather than its historical exhaustiveness.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 2 Kings 15:6 appears to be a simple historical footnote, its underlying theological principles find profound Christ-centered fulfillment. The very concept of "the rest of the acts" being recorded points to a divine meticulousness over history, a grand narrative orchestrated by God. This meticulous divine record-keeping culminates in the ultimate "act" of God: the incarnation, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. He is the central figure around whom all history revolves, the one whose "acts" are not merely recorded in human annals but are eternally significant and salvific. The selective nature of the Old Testament narratives, which point to fuller accounts elsewhere, foreshadows the ultimate and complete revelation of God in Christ, who is the "fullness of the Godhead bodily" (Colossians 2:9). Just as the Old Testament points beyond itself to a more complete story, so too does all history point to the coming of the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. In Christ, we find not just a summary of deeds, but the very embodiment of God's redemptive purpose, the One in whom "all things hold together" (Colossians 1:17), and whose story is the definitive chronicle of salvation for all eternity. The "book of life" (Revelation 20:12) is the ultimate chronicle, where those whose names are written in Christ are found, fulfilling God's sovereign plan throughout all the "days."

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Kings 15 verses 1–7

This is a short account of the reign of Azariah. 1. Most of it is general, and the same that has been given of others; he began young and reigned long (Kg2 15:2), did, for the most part, that which was right, Kg2 15:3 (it was happy for the kingdom that a good reign was a long one), only he had not zeal and courage enough to take away the high places, Kg2 15:4. 2. That which is peculiar, Kg2 15:5 (that God smote him with a leprosy) is more largely related, with the occasion of it, Ch2 26:16, etc., where we have also a fuller account of the glories of the former part of his reign, as well as of the disgraces of the latter part of it. He did that which was right, as Amaziah had done; like him, he began well, but failed before he finished. Here we are told, (1.) That he was a leper. The greatest of men are not only subject to the common calamities, but also to the common infirmities, of human nature; and, if they be guilty of any heinous sin, they lie as open as the meanest to the most grievous strokes of divine vengeance. (2.) God smote him with this leprosy, to chastise him for his presumptuous invasion of the priests' office. If great men be proud men, some way or other God will humble them, and make them know he is both above them and against them, for he resisteth the proud. (3.) That he was a leper to the day of his death. Though we have reason to think he repented and the sin was pardoned, yet, for warning to others, he was continued under this mark of God's displeasure as long as he lived, and perhaps it was for the good of his soul that he was so. (4.) That he dwelt in a separate house, as being made ceremonially unclean by the law, to the discipline of which, though a king, he must submit. He that presumptuously intruded into God's temple, and pretended to be a priest, was justly shut out from his own palace, and shut up as a prisoner or recluse, ever after. We suppose that his separate house was made as convenient and agreeable as might be. Some translate it a free house, where he had liberty to take his pleasure. However, it was a great mortification to one that had been so much a man of honour, and a man of business, as he had been, to be cut off from society and dwell always in a separate house: it would almost make life itself a burden, even to kings, though they have never any to converse with but their inferiors; the most contemplative men would soon be weary of it. (5.) That his son was his viceroy in the affairs both of his court (for he was over the house) and of his kingdom (for he was judging the people of the land); and it was both a comfort to him and a blessing to his kingdom that he had such a son to fill up his room.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–7. Public domain.
Copy as
Ishodad of MervAD 850
BOOKS OF SESSIONS 2 KINGS 15:3
In the book of Chronicles [it is written]: Uzziah “did what was right in the sight of the Lord, just as his father David, and God made him prosper.” “He built” fortresses “and palaces and high towers which were reinforced with iron bolts.” “But when he had become strong, he grew proud; he became an infidel to the Lord his God and entered the temple of the Lord to make the censer-bearers of perfumes smoke. But the priest Azariah went in after him and said to him, ‘It is not for you, king, [to make offerings].’ And the king was angered with the priests and ordered them to be driven out of the sanctuary. But at the same time a leprous disease broke out of the holy place on his forehead.” And when he died, “they did not bury him in the burial field that belonged to the kings, for they said, ‘He is leprous.’ ”He was struck with leprosy because, besides kingship, he dared arrogate priesthood, without remembering what had happened to the people of Dathan and Korah and what had happened to Jeroboam. That is why he received a punishment on a part of his body that was conspicuous. And since no prophet had reproached him, except for the priest Azariah, the gift of prophecy was withheld from [all prophets] until the death of Uzziah. And the bronze bull which they worshiped bellowed and produced a tremendous noise, while blood, ravaging and plagues reigned among the people. And the prophet Zechariah referred to these events when he said, “And you shall flee as you fled from the earthquake in the days of King Uzziah of Judah.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Kings 15:6 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.