TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Kings 20:22–30. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here an account of another successful campaign which Ahab, by divine aid, made against the Syrians, in which he gave them a greater defeat than in the former. Strange! Ahab idolatrous and yet victorious, a persecutor and yet a conqueror! God has wise and holy ends in suffering wicked men to prosper, and glorifies his own name thereby.
I.Ahab is admonished by a prophet to prepare for another war, Kg1 20:22.
It should seem, he was now secure, and looked but a little way before him. Those that are careless of their souls are often as careless of their outwards affairs; but the prophet (to whom God made known the following counsels of the Syrians) told him they would renew their attempt at the return of the year, hoping to retrieve the honour they had lost and be avenged for the blow they had received. He therefore bade him strengthen himself, put himself into a posture of defence, and be ready to give them a warm reception. God had decreed the end, but Ahab must use the means, else he tempts God: "Help thyself, strengthen thyself, and God will help and strengthen thee." The enemies of God's Israel are restless in their malice, and, though they may take some breathing-time for themselves, yet they are still breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the church. It concerns us always to expect assaults from our spiritual enemies, and therefore to mark and see what we do.
II.Ben-hadad is advised by those about him concerning the operations of the next campaign.
1.They advised him to change his ground, Kg1 20:23. They took it for granted that it was not Israel, but Israel's gods, that beat them (so great a regard was then universally had to invisible powers); but they speak very ignorantly of Jehovah - that he was many, whereas he is one and his name one, - that he was their God only, a local deity, peculiar to that nation, whereas he is the Creator and ruler of all the world, - and that he was a God of the hills only, because David their great prophet had said, I will lift up my eyes to the hills whence cometh my help (Psa 121:1), and that his foundation was in the holy mountain (Psa 87:1; Psa 78:54), and much was said of his holy hill (Psa 15:1; Psa 24:3); supposing him altogether such a one as their imaginary deities, they fancied he was confined to his hills, and could not or would not come down from them, and therefore an army in the valley would be below his cognizance and from under his protection. Thus vain were the Gentiles in their imaginations concerning God, so wretchedly were their foolish hearts darkened, and, professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.
2.They advised him to change his officers (Kg1 20:24, Kg1 20:25), not to employ the kings, who were commanders by birth, but captains rather, who were commanders by merit, who were inured to war, would not affect to make a show like the kings, but would go through with business. Let every man be employed in that which he is brought up to and used to, and preferred to that which he is fit for. Syria, it seems, was rich and populous, when it could furnish recruits sufficient, after so great a defeat, horse for horse, chariot for chariot.
III.Both armies take the field.
Ben-hadad, with his Syrians, encamps near Aphek, in the tribe of Asher. It is probable that Asher was a city in his own possession, one of those which his father had won (Kg1 20:34), and the country about it was flat and level, and fit for his purpose, Kg1 20:26. Ahab, with his forces, posted himself at some distance over against them, Kg1 20:27. The disproportion of numbers was very remarkable. The children of Israel, who were cantoned in two battalions, looked like two little flocks of kids, their numbers small, their equipage mean, and the figure they made contemptible; but the Syrians filled the country with their numbers, their noise, their chariots, their carriages, and their baggage.
IV.Ahab is encouraged to fight the Syrians, notwithstanding their advantages and confidence.
A man of God is sent to him, to tell him that this numerous army shall all be delivered into his hand (Kg1 20:28), but not for his sake; be it known to him, he is utterly unworthy for whom God will do this. God would not do it because Ahab had praised God or prayed to him (we do not read that he did either), but because the Syrians had blasphemed God, and had said, He is the God of the hills and not of the valleys; therefore God will do it in his own vindication, and to preserve the honour of his own name. If the Syrians had said, "Ahab and his people have forgotten their God, and so put themselves out of his protection, and therefore we may venture to attack them," God would probably have delivered Israel into their hands; but when they go upon a presumption so very injurious to the divine omnipotence, and the honour of him who is Lord of all hosts, not only in hills and valleys, but in heaven and earth, which they are willingly ignorant of, they shall be undeceived, at the expense of that vast army which is so much their pride and confidence.
V.After the armies had faced one another seven days (the Syrians, it is likely, boasting, and the Israelites trembling), they engaged, and the Syrians were totally routed, 100,000 men slain by the sword of Israel in the field of battle (Kg1 20:29), and 27,000 men, that thought themselves safe under the walls of Aphek, a fortified city (from the walls of which the shooters might annoy the enemy if they pursued them, Sa2 11:24), found their bane where they hoped for protection: the wall fell upon them, probably overthrown by an earthquake, and, the cities of Canaan being walled up to heaven, it reached a great way, and they were all killed, or hurt, or overwhelmed with dismay. Ben-hadad, who thought his city Aphek would hold out against the conquerors, finding it thus unwalled, and the remnant of his forces dispirited and dispersed, had nothing but secresy to rely upon for safety, and therefore hid himself in a chamber within a chamber, lest the pursuers should seize him. See how the greatest confidence often ends in the greatest cowardice. "Now is the God of Israel the God of the valleys or no?" He shall know now that he is forced into an inner chamber to hide himself, see Kg1 22:25.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Here the Scripture relates the two battles of the king of Israel against the Arameans, at which we have already hinted, and the twin slaughters of the Arameans, of which the second caused the death of 127, men, as God took his revenge on the impious voice of the Arameans, who said about the true God worshiped by the Israelites, “The Lord is a god of the hills, but he is not a god of the valleys.”
Thus the saints go up to the Lord, the wicked go down to sin; the saints are on the mountains, the guilty in the valleys. “For he is the God of the mountains and not the God of the valleys.” Those who dwelt in the houses of the plain where God does not dwell could not have the house of God within them, for this is the house that God sought from them so that they might build up themselves and rear within themselves the temple of God from living stones of faith. He did not want buildings made with earthen walls or wooden roofs, for the hand of an enemy would have been able to overthrow them. He wanted that temple that is built in human hearts, to whom it might be said, “You are the temple of God,” in which the Lord Jesus might dwell and from there set out to redeem all humankind. There also could be prepared a sacred chamber in the womb of the Virgin where the King of heaven might live and a human body become the temple of God, which, though it was destroyed, might yet be restored to life on the third day.
Did not the Lord wish Ben-hadad, king of Syria, whom besides countless thousands of his own people, thirty-two kings and armies of the same number of kings served, to be conquered by a few foot soldiers of the princes in order that he who was the author of such victory would be acknowledged?
Continue studying 1 Kings 20:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
First Kings 20:26 powerfully narrates the resurgence of King Ben-Hadad of Aram (Syria) for a second, meticulously planned military campaign against Israel. This verse marks the commencement of renewed hostilities following his previous, divinely orchestrated defeat, highlighting Ben-Hadad's unyielding determination, his comprehensive military mobilization, and his strategic choice of Aphek as the staging ground, thereby setting the stage for a significant and consequential confrontation with King Ahab and the kingdom of Israel.
Context
Literary Context
This verse serves as a crucial narrative pivot, immediately following the surprising and decisive victory God granted Israel over Ben-Hadad in the first engagement (1 Kings 20:1-25). The broader narrative of 1 Kings 20 is meticulously structured around two distinct military encounters between Aram and Israel, both initiated by the Aramean king. The initial battle saw Israel, despite being numerically inferior, triumph through direct divine intervention and prophetic guidance, culminating in a controversial peace treaty brokered by King Ahab. Verse 26 signals the abrupt breaking of this uneasy peace and Ben-Hadad's renewed aggression, likely fueled by a desire for revenge, to reclaim lost honor, and to reassert regional dominance. It masterfully sets the stage for the second battle, which will further illuminate God's sovereignty over nations and reveal the spiritual state of Israel under Ahab's leadership.
Historical & Cultural Context
The phrase "at the return of the year" (Hebrew: li'tshuvath ha'shanah) is a well-established idiom in the ancient Near East, referring to the springtime, which was the customary and most opportune season for military campaigns. Following the winter rains, rivers would subside, ground would dry, and agricultural activities would be less demanding, making conditions ideal for troop movement, foraging, and large-scale battles. Kings like Ben-Hadad would routinely mobilize their armies during this period. Aram (Syria) was a formidable kingdom situated to Israel's north, and conflicts between the two nations were frequent, driven by geopolitical ambitions, control of trade routes, and territorial disputes characteristic of the 9th century BCE. Ben-Hadad's act of "numbering the Syrians" signifies a thorough military census and mobilization, a common and essential practice for assessing military strength, organizing forces, and preparing for a major war. Aphek, likely the one in the Sharon plain, was a highly strategic location, offering open terrain suitable for massed armies and providing access to key routes, making it an ideal staging ground for an invasion of Israel.
Key Themes
This verse significantly contributes to several overarching themes within the book of 1 Kings and the broader Deuteronomistic History. It underscores the persistence of opposition, demonstrating that even after a clear divine victory, adversaries may regroup and return, highlighting the ongoing nature of spiritual and physical conflict for God's people. It also vividly illustrates the cycles of conflict prevalent in the ancient world, often driven by pride, territorial ambition, and vengeance, as seen in Ben-Hadad's unyielding aggression. Furthermore, Ben-Hadad's meticulous preparation by "numbering the Syrians" emphasizes the theme of strategic human planning, which, though seemingly effective and rational, will ultimately be shown to be subservient to divine will. God continues to work out His purposes through and despite human actions, as powerfully demonstrated in 1 Kings 20:28. The strategic choice of Aphek also highlights the critical importance of geographical locations in ancient warfare, a recurring motif throughout the biblical narrative, echoing similar strategic considerations seen in passages like 2 Samuel 11:1.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This idiomatic phrase, li'tshuvath ha'shanah (לִתְשׁוּבַת הַשָּׁנָה), literally translates to "at the recurrence of the year" or "at the turning of the year." The noun tᵉšûwbâh (H8666) signifies a "return" or "recurrence," while shâneh (H8141) denotes "a year" as a revolution of time. It is a common biblical idiom referring to the springtime, specifically the customary season when kings would typically go out to war (2 Samuel 11:1). This period, following the winter rains, offered favorable weather conditions for military campaigns, with dry ground for troop movement and less demand on agricultural labor. Its use here immediately signals the predictable and inevitable resumption of hostilities.
The verb pâqaḏ (פָקַד) is a primitive root with a broad semantic range, meaning "to visit (with friendly or hostile intent)," "to oversee," "to muster," "to charge," or "to count." In this specific context, it denotes a military census or a mustering of troops. Ben-Hadad's act of "numbering the Syrians" implies a deliberate, thorough, and organized mobilization of his forces. This suggests a more cautious and calculated approach than his previous, perhaps overconfident, campaign, indicating a comprehensive assessment of his military strength aimed at ensuring a decisive victory.
The name ʾĂphêq (אֲפֵק) is derived from a root meaning "strength" or "fortress." While there were several places called Aphek in ancient Israel, the one referred to here is most likely the city in the Sharon plain, east of Joppa, near the modern city of Rosh Ha'ayin. This location was strategically significant, as it commanded important trade routes and offered open terrain suitable for large-scale military engagements. It served as a natural staging ground for an invasion of Israel from the north or northeast, providing a tactical advantage for Ben-Hadad's forces.
Verse Breakdown
"And it came to pass at the return of the year"
This opening phrase immediately establishes the temporal setting for the renewed conflict. It signifies the arrival of the traditional campaigning season, indicating that the respite from war was over and that military action was expected. This timing underscores the cyclical nature of warfare in the ancient world and sets a tone of inevitability for the coming confrontation, demonstrating Ben-Hadad's relentless determination.
"that Benhadad numbered the Syrians"
This clause reveals Ben-Hadad's proactive and meticulous preparation. Unlike his previous, perhaps overconfident, advance, he now undertakes a thorough military census and mobilization of his forces (H758, ʼĂrâm, referring to the inhabitants of Aram or Syria). This action demonstrates his unwavering determination to avenge his earlier defeat and his commitment to a full-scale, organized assault, suggesting a learning from past mistakes and a desire to bring overwhelming force against Israel (H3478, Yisrâʼêl).
"and went up to Aphek, to fight against Israel"
This final clause specifies the destination and ultimate purpose of Ben-Hadad's mobilized army. The verb "went up" (H5927, ʻâlâh) implies an ascent, either literally to a higher elevation or figuratively as an advance into enemy territory. Aphek (H663), as a strategic stronghold, was chosen as the staging ground, indicating Ben-Hadad's tactical planning. The explicit declaration "to fight" (H4421, milchâmâh, meaning battle or war) "against Israel" leaves no doubt about his hostile intent and the impending confrontation.
Literary Devices
The verse masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its message with depth and impact. Foreshadowing is prominently featured, as Ben-Hadad's meticulous preparation "at the return of the year" clearly signals the inevitable renewal of hostilities, building palpable tension for the reader who is aware of the previous conflict's outcome. The phrase "return of the year" itself functions as a potent Chronological Marker, anchoring the narrative in a specific, culturally understood time for warfare and emphasizing the cyclical nature of conflict. There is also an element of Repetition in the pattern of Ben-Hadad's aggression, reinforcing the persistent opposition that Israel faces. The naming of "Aphek" serves as Strategic Imagery, immediately evoking a sense of military planning and a specific, known battleground, thereby making the narrative more vivid and concrete. The entire verse functions as a concise yet powerful Narrative Transition, smoothly shifting the focus from the aftermath of the first battle to the initiation of the second, maintaining the pace and continuity of the overarching story of Ahab's reign and Israel's complex relationship with God.
Theological and Thematic Connections
This verse, while seemingly a straightforward historical account of military preparation, carries profound theological weight. It highlights the persistent nature of opposition, both physical and spiritual, against God's people. Ben-Hadad's unwavering determination to fight again, despite a clear divine intervention in the previous battle, underscores the reality that evil and hostile forces do not easily concede defeat. This persistence serves as a crucial backdrop against which God's continued sovereignty and faithfulness to His covenant people will be demonstrated, even when His people are disobedient. It also implicitly raises questions about human pride and the futility of relying solely on military might or numerical superiority, as Ben-Hadad's meticulous numbering of his troops will ultimately prove insufficient against the Lord's purposes. The verse sets the stage for another divine demonstration that "the battle is the Lord's" and that human strength is ultimately vain when pitted against God's will.
Reflection and Application
The return of Ben-Hadad "at the return of the year" serves as a profound reminder that challenges, temptations, and opposition in life are often cyclical and persistent. Just as Ben-Hadad, undeterred by a previous defeat, meticulously regrouped and prepared for another assault, so too must believers recognize that spiritual battles and life's difficulties do not always vanish after a single victory. This verse calls us to move beyond complacency, especially after seasons of success, rest, or divine intervention. It underscores the critical importance of ongoing vigilance, strategic preparedness, and unwavering reliance on God's strength, rather than our own. We are reminded that our adversary, like Ben-Hadad, is relentless and seeks every opportune moment to attack. Therefore, we are called to remain spiritually alert, to continually put on the full armor of God, and to seek His guidance in every season, understanding that true and lasting victory comes not from our strength or numbers, but from the Lord who fights for us and empowers us to stand firm.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What is the significance of "at the return of the year" in this context?
The phrase "at the return of the year" is a common biblical idiom referring to the springtime, typically after the winter rains. This was the customary season for military campaigns in the ancient Near East, as the weather conditions became favorable for troop movements, and agricultural demands were lower, allowing for the mobilization of armies. Its significance here is to mark the predictable resumption of hostilities, signaling that the period of peace after the first battle was merely a temporary lull. Ben-Hadad was returning to war at the earliest opportune moment, emphasizing the cyclical nature of conflict and his relentless determination, as also seen in 2 Samuel 11:1.
Why did Ben-Hadad "number the Syrians" if he had just been defeated?
Ben-Hadad's act of "numbering the Syrians" (a military census or mustering) indicates a deliberate and thorough preparation, contrasting with his previous, perhaps overconfident, approach. Despite his recent defeat, he was determined to regain his honor and territory. This action suggests he was learning from his mistakes, aiming to ensure overwhelming numerical superiority and better organization for the upcoming battle. It reflects a strategic recalculation and a commitment to a full-scale, decisive war, rather than a haphazard attack, highlighting his pride and refusal to acknowledge God's hand in the previous defeat (1 Kings 20:23).
What was the strategic importance of Aphek?
Aphek was a strategically significant city in ancient Israel, likely the one located in the Sharon plain (modern Rosh Ha'ayin). Its importance lay in its geographical position, commanding key trade routes and offering open terrain suitable for large armies to maneuver. For an invading force like the Arameans, Aphek served as an ideal staging ground or a fortified base from which to launch an attack into Israelite territory. Its selection by Ben-Hadad underscores his tactical planning and his intent to engage Israel in a decisive battle on ground he believed would be favorable, a common military strategy in the ancient world.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While 1 Kings 20:26 details a historical military conflict, it prophetically points to the persistent nature of spiritual opposition that ultimately finds its decisive defeat and eternal conquest in Christ. Ben-Hadad's relentless return "at the return of the year" foreshadows the enduring reality of spiritual warfare, where the enemy, though defeated at the cross, continually seeks to regroup and attack God's people (1 Peter 5:8). However, unlike the earthly kings who number their armies in vain, Christ is the true Commander who has already secured the ultimate victory. His "numbering" is not of troops for battle, but of His redeemed, whose names are eternally written in the Lamb's Book of Life. The strategic location of Aphek, where earthly battles were fought, contrasts sharply with the cosmic battle won on the cross, where Christ disarmed the principalities and powers, triumphing over them decisively (Colossians 2:15). Just as God intervened to grant Israel victory despite their weakness, Christ, through His finished work, provides believers with an eternal triumph over sin, death, and the devil. His resurrection is the ultimate "return of the year," ushering in a new season of victory and life for all who trust in Him, ensuring that though spiritual battles may persist, the war is already won, and the ultimate kingdom belongs to Him alone (Revelation 11:15).