Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And he begat of Hodesh his wife, Jobab, and Zibia, and Mesha, and Malcham,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And he begat H3205 of Hodesh H2321 his wife H802, Jobab H3103, and Zibia H6644, and Mesha H4331, and Malcham H4445,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
it was through his wife Hodesh that he fathered: Yovav, Tzivya, Mesha, Malkam,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
His sons by his wife Hodesh:
Ask
American Standard Version
And he begat of Hodesh his wife, Jobab, and Zibia, and Mesha, and Malcam,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He became the father of Hodesh his wife, Jobab, and Zibia, and Mesha, and Malcam,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
He begate, I say, of Hodesh his wife, Iobab and Zibia, and Mesha, and Malcham,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And he begetteth of Hodesh his wife, Jobab, and Zibia, and Mesha, and Malcham,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,585 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 8:9 is a specific entry within the extensive genealogical records of the tribe of Benjamin, meticulously detailing four sons—Jobab, Zibia, Mesha, and Malcham—born to Shaharaim by his wife Hodesh. This verse, like the broader genealogical sections of 1 Chronicles, serves to meticulously trace the lineage and family structures of ancient Israel, thereby reaffirming the identity, heritage, and continuity of God's covenant people in the post-exilic period and underscoring His faithfulness in preserving His chosen line.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 8:9 is situated within the lengthy genealogical section of 1 Chronicles (chapters 1-9), which meticulously traces the lineage of Israel from Adam through the various tribes, culminating in a detailed focus on Judah and Benjamin. Chapter 8 specifically enumerates the descendants of Benjamin, a tribe of significant historical importance, being the tribe of Israel's first king, Saul, and later, many returning exiles. The immediate context of 1 Chronicles 8:8-10 details the complex family of Shaharaim, a Benjaminite, who had children by multiple wives, including Hodesh. These lists are not merely dry records but serve as foundational information for the Chronicler's audience, establishing tribal identity, land rights, and the continuity of God's people after the Babylonian exile. They provide a vital bridge between the past and the present for a community seeking to re-establish itself.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was likely composed after the Babylonian exile (around 450-400 BC), during a period when the returning Jewish community in Judah was striving to rebuild their national and religious identity. For these exiles, understanding their tribal affiliations, ancestral land rights, and priestly lineages was paramount for re-establishing order and continuity in the land. Genealogies served as legal and social documents, affirming who belonged to the covenant community and their place within it. The mention of Shaharaim's multiple wives (as seen in the broader passage of 1 Chronicles 8:8-10) reflects the cultural practice of polygamy prevalent in ancient Israel, which, while permitted under Mosaic Law, often led to complex family dynamics and required careful record-keeping for inheritance and tribal purity.
  • Key Themes: This verse, and the genealogies it belongs to, underscores several critical themes central to the Chronicler's message. Firstly, Genealogy and Lineage is paramount, demonstrating the careful preservation of family lines as a testament to identity, inheritance, and the fulfillment of God's promises through specific families. This meticulous record-keeping is consistent throughout Scripture, from the early patriarchal narratives in Genesis 5 to the lineage of Christ in the New Testament. Secondly, Continuity and Preservation highlights God's faithfulness in maintaining His covenant people despite periods of upheaval, such as the Babylonian exile. The very act of recording these names assures the post-exilic community that God's plan endures through successive generations. Lastly, the genealogies serve as a vital Historical Record, providing invaluable data for understanding the social, familial, and demographic structures of ancient Israel, including naming conventions and familial succession, all of which contribute to the larger narrative of God's redemptive work.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • begat (Hebrew, yâlad, H3205): This fundamental Hebrew verb, frequently translated as "begat" or "fathered," is central to biblical genealogies. It denotes not merely biological procreation but the act of establishing a lineage, continuing a family line, and passing on heritage. The root implies the bringing forth of young, but in this context, it signifies the act of a male parent siring offspring. In the context of 1 Chronicles, its repeated use emphasizes the unbroken chain of generations, underscoring the continuity of God's covenant people despite historical disruptions like the exile. It signifies the divine orchestration of human history through specific family lines.
  • Hodesh (Hebrew, Chôdesh, H2321): The name Hodesh literally means "new moon" or "month." As the specific wife of Shaharaim mentioned in this verse, her inclusion, along with the names of her sons, reinforces the meticulous detail with which the Chronicler records the Benjaminite families. While the text does not elaborate on the significance of her name in relation to her character or the birth of her sons, names in ancient Israel often carried symbolic meaning, reflecting circumstances of birth, hopes of parents, or even a divine connection. Her designation as "his wife" (Hebrew, ʼishshâh H802) further clarifies her marital status and the legitimacy of her offspring within the genealogical record.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And he begat of Hodesh his wife": This clause identifies Shaharaim as the father and Hodesh as the mother of the children listed. The phrase "of Hodesh his wife" clarifies the specific maternal lineage, distinguishing these sons from those born to Shaharaim by his other wives mentioned in the preceding verses (e.g., Hushim and Baara in 1 Chronicles 8:8). This precision is characteristic of genealogical records, ensuring clarity regarding familial relationships, tribal affiliations, and inheritance rights within the complex family structures of ancient Israel.
  • "Jobab, and Zibia, and Mesha, and Malcham": This is a simple enumeration of four sons born to Shaharaim and Hodesh. The listing of names without further elaboration is typical of genealogical passages, where the primary purpose is to establish lineage rather than provide biographical details. Each name represents an individual who contributed to the unfolding history of the tribe of Benjamin, and by extension, the nation of Israel. While the meanings of these specific names (e.g., Jobab meaning "howler" or Mesha meaning "departure") are not explicitly stated in the text, their inclusion underscores the Chronicler's commitment to preserving the full record of the post-exilic community's ancestry, ensuring no link in the chain was lost.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 8:9, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of the book, is Genealogy itself. This is not merely a list but a structured literary form designed to establish lineage, affirm identity, validate claims (e.g., to land or priestly office), and demonstrate historical continuity. The Chronicler employs Enumeration by systematically listing names, which serves to provide a comprehensive record of the Benjaminite clan. The repetitive use of the verb "begat" (or similar procreative terms) throughout the genealogies is a form of Repetition, which reinforces the theme of generational succession and the unbroken chain of God's covenant people. While seemingly dry, these lists are a powerful theological statement, asserting God's faithfulness in preserving His chosen line through the ebb and flow of human history, and assuring the post-exilic community of their legitimate place within that divine narrative.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The meticulous recording of names and lineages, as seen in 1 Chronicles 8:9, profoundly illustrates God's sovereign involvement in human history and His unwavering commitment to His covenant promises. These genealogies are not just historical documents; they are theological statements affirming that God's plan unfolds through specific individuals and families across generations. They demonstrate His meticulous attention to detail, valuing every person and every family line as part of His grand redemptive narrative. For the post-exilic community, these lists provided a tangible link to their past, assuring them of their continued identity as God's people and the enduring nature of His covenant, even after national catastrophe. They serve as a testament to the fact that God never loses track of His people, and His purposes will ultimately be fulfilled through the very human families He has chosen, culminating in the promised Messiah.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While a list of names like those in 1 Chronicles 8:9 might initially seem distant from contemporary life, it offers profound insights for reflection and application. This verse, nestled within God's divinely inspired Word, reminds us of God's intricate involvement in the lives of individuals and families throughout history. Every person, every generation, plays a part in His overarching plan, no matter how seemingly small or insignificant. Just as the returning exiles found identity and purpose in understanding their heritage, we too can find a sense of belonging and continuity by recognizing our place within God's ongoing story—a story that encompasses both our physical and spiritual lineage. It calls us to appreciate the faithfulness of God, who preserves His people and His purposes across millennia, inviting us to trust in His long-term vision for our own lives and for the Church. This passage encourages us to consider the legacy we are building, not just for our immediate families, but for the generations that will follow, understanding that even the seemingly mundane details of our lives are woven into God's eternal tapestry.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does God's meticulous attention to detail in preserving genealogies, as seen in this verse, impact your understanding of His care for your own life and family?
  • In what ways does your personal or spiritual heritage (e.g., family history, church tradition, theological lineage) shape your identity and faith today?
  • What does this seemingly simple verse, within its broader context, teach us about God's enduring faithfulness across generations, even through periods of difficulty or exile?

FAQ

Why are there so many genealogies in the Bible, especially in 1 Chronicles?

Answer: Genealogies in the Bible serve multiple crucial purposes beyond mere historical record. In 1 Chronicles, written for the post-exilic community, they were vital for re-establishing identity, confirming tribal affiliations for land claims, validating priestly and Levitical service, and demonstrating the continuity of God's covenant with Israel. They assured the returning exiles that they were indeed the rightful heirs to God's promises and land, providing a sense of stability and belonging after a period of displacement. Ultimately, they also serve a theological purpose, tracing the lines through which God's redemptive plan would unfold, culminating in the Messiah. For example, the lists in Ezra 2 and Nehemiah 7 were critical for identifying who truly belonged to the returning community and for organizing their society.

What is the significance of Shaharaim having multiple wives in this context?

Answer: The mention of Shaharaim having multiple wives (Hushim, Baara, and Hodesh, as seen in 1 Chronicles 8:8-9) reflects the cultural reality of polygamy in ancient Israel. While not God's original design for marriage (as established in Genesis 2:24), it was a practice permitted and regulated under the Mosaic Law. The Chronicler's purpose here is not to endorse or condemn polygamy, but simply to accurately record the familial relationships and the full extent of Shaharaim's descendants, as these were crucial for establishing tribal identity and lineage within the Benjaminite clan. It is a descriptive account of the social structures of the time, highlighting the complexities of family lines that the genealogies sought to clarify.

Are these genealogies historically accurate?

Answer: Biblical genealogies are generally considered historically reliable for their intended purpose, which is primarily theological and to establish continuity. While they may not always adhere to modern standards of exhaustive historical record-keeping (e.g., they might be selective, summarized, or use different methods of counting generations, sometimes omitting less significant individuals or consolidating lines), their accuracy in establishing lineage and tribal connections for the ancient audience is widely accepted by scholars. They served as vital legal and social documents for the Israelites, ensuring proper inheritance, land distribution, and the continuity of the priesthood. Their preservation underscores their importance in the biblical narrative as a testament to God's faithfulness in guiding His people through history.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Even a seemingly minor genealogical entry like 1 Chronicles 8:9 finds its ultimate significance and fulfillment in the person of Jesus Christ. The meticulous preservation of these ancient lineages, including those of Benjamin, underscores God's sovereign hand in guiding human history towards a singular, redemptive climax. Every name, every family, and every tribe, no matter how obscure, contributed to the grand tapestry that ultimately produced the Messiah. The Old Testament genealogies, culminating in the detailed accounts in Matthew 1 and Luke 3, demonstrate that Jesus is the true heir to all the promises made to Abraham, David, and indeed, all of Israel. He is the ultimate "begat," the one through whom God's family is truly established, not merely by physical descent but by spiritual new birth, as articulated in John 1:12-13. In Christ, the fragmented tribal identities are unified into one new people, the Church, whose identity and heritage are found not in earthly lineages but in their union with the Son of God. He is the fulfillment of all the hopes and promises that these ancient records implicitly pointed towards, bringing true and eternal belonging to all who believe and making them part of a spiritual lineage that transcends time and earthly boundaries, as described in Galatians 3:28-29.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 8 verses 1–32

There is little or nothing of history in all these verses; we have not therefore much to observe. 1. As to the difficulties that occur in this and the foregoing genealogies we need not perplex ourselves. I presume Ezra took them as he found them in the books of the kings of Israel and Judah (Ezr 9:1), according as they were given in by the several tribes, each observing what method they thought fit. Hence some ascend, others desecnd; some have numbers affixed, others places; some have historical remarks intermixed, others have not; some are shorter, others longer; some agree with other records, others differ; some, it is likely, were torn, erased, and blotted, others more legible. Those of Dan and Reuben were entirely lost. This holy man wrote as he was moved by the Holy Ghost; but there was no necessity for the making up of the defects, no, nor for the rectifying of the mistakes, of these genealogies by inspiration. It was sufficient that he copied them out as they came into his hand, or so much of them as was requisite to the present purpose, which was the directing of the returned captives to settle as nearly as they could with those of their own family, and in the places of their former residence. We may suppose that many things in these genealogies which to us seem intricate, abrupt, and perplexed, were plain and easy to them then (who knew how to fill up the deficiencies) and abundantly answered the intention of the publishing of them. 2. Many great and mighty nations there were now in being upon earth, and many illustrious men in them, whose names are buried in perpetual oblivion, while the names of multitudes of the Israel of God are here carefully preserved in everlasting remembrance. They are Jasher, Jeshurun - just ones, and the memory of the just is blessed. Many of these we have reason to fear, came short of everlasting honour (for even the wicked kings of Judah come into the genealogy), yet the perpetuating of their names here was a figure of the writing of the names of all God's spiritual Israel in the Lamb's book of life. 3. This tribe of Benjamin was once brought to a very low ebb, in the time of the judges, upon the occasion of the iniquity of Gibeah, when only 600 men escaped the sword of justice; and yet, in these genealogies, it makes as good a figure as almost any of the tribes: for it is the honour of God to help the weakest and raise up those that are most diminished and abased. 4. Here is mention of one Ehud (Ch1 8:6), in the preceding verse of one Gera (Ch1 8:5) and (Ch1 8:8) of one that descended from him, that begat children in the country of Moab, which inclines me to think it was that Ehud who was the second of the judges of Israel; for he is said to be the son of Gera and a Benjamite (Jdg 3:15), and he delivered Israel from the oppression of the Moabites by killing the king of Moab, which might give him a greater sway in the country of Moab than we find evidence of in his history and might occasion some of his posterity to settle there. 5. Here is mention of some of the Benjamites that drove away the inhabitants of Gath (Ch1 8:13), perhaps those that had slain the Ephraimites (Ch1 7:21) or their posterity, by way of reprisal: and one of those that did this piece of justice was named Beriah too, that name in which the memorial of that injury was preserved. 6. Particular notice is taken of those that dwelt in Jerusalem (Ch1 8:28 and again Ch1 8:32), that those whose ancestors had had their residence there might thereby be induced, at their return from captivity, to settle there too, which, for aught that appears, few were willing to do, because it was the post of danger: and therefore we find (Neh 11:2) the people blessed those that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem, the greater part being inclined to prefer the cities of Judah. Those whose godly parents had their conversation in the new Jerusalem should thereby be engaged to set their faces thitherward and pursue the way thither, whatever it cost them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–32. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 8:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.