Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the sons of Mishma; Hamuel his son, Zacchur his son, Shimei his son.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the sons H1121 of Mishma H4927; Hamuel H2536 his son H1121, Zacchur H2139 his son H1121, Shimei H8096 his son H1121.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The descendants of Mishma: his son Hamu'el, his son Zakur, his son Shim'i.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The sons of Mishma: Hammuel, Zaccur, and Shimei.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Mishma: Hammuel his son, Zaccur his son, Shimei his son.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Mishma: Hammuel his son, Zaccur his son, Shimei his son.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the sonnes of Mishma, Hamuel was his sonne, Zacchur his sonne, and Shimei his sonne.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And sons of Mishma: Hammuel his son, Zacchur his son, Shimei his son.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,412 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 4:26 meticulously records a specific segment of the genealogical lineage within the tribe of Simeon, identifying Hamuel, Zacchur, and Shimei as direct descendants of Mishma. This concise verse, embedded within the extensive opening genealogies of 1 Chronicles, serves to establish and preserve the historical continuity and tribal identity of Israel, underscoring God's faithfulness in maintaining His covenant people through successive generations.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within the expansive genealogical records that comprise the first nine chapters of 1 Chronicles, tracing Israel's lineage from Adam through the patriarchs and then focusing on the twelve tribes. Specifically, 1 Chronicles 4 details the descendants of Judah (verses 1-23) and Simeon (verses 24-43). Verse 26 is part of the enumeration of Simeon's tribal families, following the initial listing of Simeon's sons and preceding further details about their settlements and expansion within the territory of Judah. The chronicler's meticulous attention to these names emphasizes the continuity of the Israelite people and their tribal identities, providing a foundational historical and legal framework for the post-exilic community to whom the book was primarily addressed. This section, though seemingly dry, is crucial for understanding the social, religious, and land-ownership structures of ancient Israel, demonstrating the divine preservation of the covenant line.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was likely composed in the post-exilic period (c. 450-400 BC), after the return of the Jewish people from Babylonian captivity. For this community, establishing their identity, re-affirming their tribal affiliations, and re-claiming ancestral lands were paramount. Genealogies served as vital legal and historical documents, validating claims to land, priestly service, and tribal membership. The detailed record of Simeon's descendants, even a seemingly minor branch like Mishma's, reinforced the legitimacy and continuity of the returned exiles as the true Israel. The tribe of Simeon, notably, had its inheritance within the territory of Judah, as detailed in Joshua 19:1-9, and later appears to have been largely absorbed into Judah, making the preservation of its distinct lineage particularly significant for the chronicler's audience.
  • Key Themes: The inclusion of 1 Chronicles 4:26 contributes to several overarching themes in the book. First, it highlights Historical Record and Continuity, demonstrating God's meticulous preservation of the lineage of His people, thereby affirming the unbroken chain of generations and the faithfulness of His covenant promises. Second, it underscores the importance of Tribal Identity within ancient Israel; each name contributes to the larger mosaic of tribal relationships and responsibilities, crucial for national cohesion and adherence to the Mosaic Law. The precise naming reinforces the distinctiveness and heritage of each family unit. Finally, the very presence of such detailed, seemingly minor information reflects God's Meticulousness and Sovereignty over history. It suggests that every individual and every generation, no matter how seemingly obscure, is known and accounted for in God's grand design, indicating His active involvement in the specific lives and histories of His people, a theme richly developed in passages like Psalm 139:1-6.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • son (Hebrew, bên, H1121): This ubiquitous Hebrew term (H1121) is central to genealogical records, denoting a male offspring and, by extension, a builder of the family name. Its repeated use in 1 Chronicles 4:26 ("Hamuel his son, Zacchur his son, Shimei his son") emphasizes the direct, patrilineal succession crucial for establishing tribal identity, inheritance, and the continuity of the covenant line. The term signifies not just biological descent but also the perpetuation of a family's legacy and place within the larger Israelite community.
  • Mishma (Hebrew, Mishmâʻ, H4927): The name Mishma (H4927) serves as the foundational patriarch for this specific branch of Simeon's lineage recorded in the verse. While the Strong's data notes its similarity to a name meaning "hearing" or "report," in this context, it primarily functions as a proper noun, a named individual whose descendants are now being meticulously listed. Its inclusion highlights the chronicler's commitment to tracing specific family units within the broader tribal structure.
  • Hamuel (Hebrew, Chammûwʼêl, H2536): This name (H2536) means "anger of God." As the first listed son of Mishma, Hamuel represents the immediate next generation in this particular line. While the theological implications of the name's meaning are not explicitly explored in the text, its presence, like all names in these genealogies, signifies a real individual known and recorded by God, contributing to the unfolding history of His people. The inclusion of "El" (God) within the name is a common feature of Hebrew names, subtly pointing to the divine context of their lives.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the sons of Mishma;": This opening clause establishes the direct lineage being traced, immediately identifying Mishma as the patriarch from whom the subsequent names descend. This formulaic introduction is typical of biblical genealogies, ensuring clarity in the generational progression and placing the following individuals within a specific family unit and tribal branch.
  • "Hamuel his son,": This identifies the first direct male descendant of Mishma. The phrase "his son" explicitly states the paternal relationship, reinforcing the direct line of descent. This meticulous naming is crucial for establishing the legal and historical validity of the lineage, particularly for claims to land and tribal identity in ancient Israel.
  • "Zacchur his son,": This continues the direct line of descent, identifying Zacchur as the son of Hamuel. The repetition of "his son" emphasizes the unbroken chain of male succession, which was vital for tribal identity, inheritance, and the preservation of the covenant promises. The chronicler's precision underscores the importance of each link in the generational chain.
  • "Shimei his son.": This concludes the specific sequence of descendants listed in this verse, identifying Shimei as the son of Zacchur. The final "his son" brings this particular genealogical segment to a close, providing a precise record of three generations stemming from Mishma, with each link in the chain carefully noted for historical and theological purposes.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 4:26, and indeed throughout the genealogical sections of 1 Chronicles, is Enumeration. The verse is a straightforward list of names, systematically counting and identifying individuals within a family line. This precise listing serves a documentary purpose, creating a historical record that establishes identity and validates claims. Closely related is Repetition, specifically of the phrase "his son," which appears three times. This repetitive structure reinforces the direct, generational succession and emphasizes the unbroken chain of descent, which was paramount for establishing tribal and familial claims in ancient Israel. Furthermore, the entire section functions as a Genealogy, which itself is a distinct literary form in ancient Near Eastern literature, designed to establish identity, legitimacy, and continuity, often with a profound theological underpinning that connects human history to divine purpose and covenant faithfulness.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

While 1 Chronicles 4:26 may appear to be a mere list of names, its theological significance lies in its contribution to the overarching narrative of God's faithfulness to His covenant people. The meticulous preservation of these lineages, even those of seemingly minor figures within the tribe of Simeon, demonstrates God's sovereign hand in history and His unwavering commitment to His promises. It underscores the truth that every individual, every generation, and every family unit is known and valued by God, playing a part in His grand redemptive plan. This attention to detail reflects the divine care that extends beyond the famous figures to the ordinary members of His people, affirming their identity and place within the unfolding story of salvation. The chronicler's emphasis on these genealogies served to remind the post-exilic community of their roots, their divine election, and their continuity as the people of God, despite the disruptions of exile, assuring them of God's enduring covenant love.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

In a world that often values fame, power, and outward achievement, 1 Chronicles 4:26 offers a profound, if subtle, reminder of the divine perspective on human life. These names, seemingly obscure to a modern reader, were vital links in a chain that God meticulously preserved. This verse encourages us to consider that our lives, even in their quietest moments and seemingly ordinary contributions, are known and valued by God. It affirms that we are part of a larger, unfolding narrative—God's story of redemption—and that our existence has purpose within His sovereign plan. Just as God kept track of every generation leading to the fulfillment of His promises, so too does He orchestrate the details of our lives, ensuring that we are never forgotten or insignificant in His eyes. This should inspire a deeper trust in His meticulous care and a recognition of our unique place within His eternal purposes, knowing that our "small" stories are woven into His grand design.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the Bible's meticulous recording of genealogies, even seemingly "minor" ones, challenge our modern tendency to value only what is famous or outwardly significant?
  • What does God's attention to individual names and lineages in Scripture teach us about His care for each person's life and story today?
  • In what ways can understanding our own "roots"—whether familial, cultural, or spiritual—provide a deeper sense of identity and purpose in light of God's grand narrative?

FAQ

Why are there so many genealogies in the Bible, especially in 1 Chronicles?

Answer: The extensive genealogies in 1 Chronicles, including 1 Chronicles 4:26, serve multiple crucial purposes, particularly for the post-exilic community for whom the book was written. First, they established identity and continuity for a people returning from exile, reminding them of their heritage as God's chosen nation, tracing their lineage back to Adam and the patriarchs. Second, they were vital for legal and social validation, confirming tribal affiliations, land rights, and eligibility for priestly or royal service (e.g., the lineage of Judah leading to David, or Levi for the priesthood). Third, they provided a historical framework, connecting the present community to their past and demonstrating God's faithfulness in preserving His covenant people through generations, even through periods of judgment and exile. This meticulous record-keeping underscores the historical reliability of the biblical narrative and God's sovereign hand in human history, leading ultimately to the promised Messiah, whose lineage is also carefully recorded in the New Testament, such as in Matthew 1:1-17.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 4:26, with its list of names, does not directly prophesy Christ, it finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment by contributing to the meticulous preservation of the lineage through which the Messiah would ultimately come. The chronicler's painstaking effort to record every generation, particularly those within the tribe of Judah (which precedes and follows the Simeon account in 1 Chronicles 4), underscores God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises, especially the promise of a coming King from the line of David. Every name, every "his son," in these genealogies, no matter how obscure, represents a link in the unbroken chain that God sovereignly maintained, ensuring the physical and legal lineage of Jesus Christ. The very existence of such detailed records in the Old Testament provides the historical bedrock for the New Testament claims of Jesus' messianic identity, as seen in the genealogies presented in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38. Thus, 1 Chronicles 4:26, though seemingly mundane, is a testament to the divine orchestrator of history, who meticulously prepares the way for the arrival of the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, demonstrating that even the "dry" lists of Scripture point to the living hope found in Christ Jesus.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 4 verses 24–43

We have here some of the genealogies of the tribe of Simeon (though it was not a tribe of great note), especially the princes of that tribe, Ch1 4:38. Of this tribe it is said that they increased greatly, but not like the children of Judah, Ch1 4:27. Those whom God increases ought to be thankful, though they see others that are more increased. Here observe, 1. The cities allotted them (Ch1 4:28), of which see Jos 19:1, etc. When it is said that they were theirs unto the reign of David (Ch1 4:31) intimation is given that when the ten tribes revolted from the house of David many of the Simeonites quitted these cities, because they lay within Judah, and seated themselves elsewhere. 2. The ground they got elsewhere. When those of this tribe that revolted from the house of David were carried captive with the rest into Assyria those that adhered to Judah were remarkably owned of God and prospered in their endeavours to enlarge their coasts. It was in the days of Hezekiah that a generation of Simeonites, whose tribe had long crouched and truckled, was animated to make these bold efforts. (1.) Some of them attacked a place in Arabia, as it should seem, called the entrance of Gedor, inhabited by the posterity of accursed Ham (Ch1 4:40), made themselves masters of it, and dwelt there. This adds to the glory of Hezekiah's pious reign, that, as his kingdom in general prospered, so did particular families. It is said that they found fat pastures, and yet the land was quiet; even when the kings of Assyria were giving disturbance to all their neighbours this land escaped their alarms. The inhabitants being shepherds, who molested none, were not themselves molested, till the Simeonites came and drove them out and succeeded them, not only in the plenty, but in the peace, of their land. Those who dwell (as we do) in a fruitful country, and whose land is wide, and quiet, and peaceable, have reason to own themselves indebted to that God who appoints the bounds of our habitation. (2.) Others of them, to the number of 500, under the command of four brethren here named, made a descent upon Mount Seir, and smote the remainder of the devoted Amalekites, and took possession of their country, Ch1 4:42, Ch1 4:43. Now the curses on Ham and Amalek had a further accomplishment, when they seemed dormant, if not dead; as had also the curse on Simeon, that he should be divided and scattered (Gen 49:7): yet to him it was turned into a blessing, for the families of Simeon, which thus transplanted themselves into those distant countries, are said to dwell there unto this day (Ch1 4:43), by which it should seem they escaped the calamities of the captivity. Providence sometimes sends those out of trouble that are designed for preservation.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 24–43. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 4:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.